han and president zelenskyi is already an after-the-fact of what happened in crimea well, it's not a secret for anyone that turkey has such a very own, very subjective vision of what should be in the autonomous republic of crimea and in general when talking about crimea here supports our territorial integrity and close historical ties with the representatives of the crimean tatar people, you know all this actually and without me taking into account the fact that yesterday there was cotton in the crimea and in kerch and in the belbek area, which is not far from sevastopol, a little earlier i had the information was shared in one place, but it was not possible to clarify it, in any case, there was some smoke there of unknown origin, and the institute for the study of war is trying to understand how and at what expense this cotton could have been sold, and who was really the cause and the executor of it, the russians sources reported on the explosions throughout the crimea and were caused by russian air defense by ukrainian

intelligence or by a ukrainian attack at night on august 18, according to the report of analysts. air defense was shot down by ukrainian drones, was there any drone at all in kerch or belbek, but the institute mentions the possible causes of the explosions in sevastopol and kerch. the attack of the armed forces of ukraine is the first action of ukrainian intelligence. the second is the bad behavior of the russians with their equipment. and fifth, the shaken nerves of the russian occupiers, who are probably preparing for attacks in areas that were previously considered unreachable for the ukrainian army, analysts believe that the ukrainian troops are likely to continue a campaign to target russian military facilities in occupied crimea in order to weaken the logistics capabilities of the occupiers and their ability to

support operations on the western bank of the dnieper. well, as for crimea's reaction to this night, the night explosions on the territory of the belbek airport near sevastopol did not come in vain, crimeans the network is reporting massively that entry to sevastopol is currently impossible without passing a special checkpoint, the inspection object has already been called a stop-control point. it works even late at night. well, we take a step further, we return to the analysis of internationally important events, which are now mainly focused on ukraine dmytro shirinkovskyi, an expert on international issues, the vice-rector of the ukrainian catholic university is in touch with us p . vitaliyu, i am glad to welcome you and glory to ukraine, let's try to somehow

summarize the visit of erdoğan and his message to ukraine, the signals that putin may be sending through erdoğan to ukraine. all the turkish president brought in his pocket some wishes from putin or attempts to bring peace to the situation because putin is actually already quite sick of what he started in ukraine and which he absolutely did not expect. so this is against our opposition, meanwhile erdoğan declares a window of diplomatic opportunities. the ukrainian president does not see these opportunities and says that so far we are seeing aggression. let's talk about any negotiations after the russian federation really meets and leaves our land and removes all its weapons, mr. dmytro, how would you summarize this visit, how much it can really be called age-old and how important a link it

is in the chain that can lead us to an ultimately prominent role in the conflict with the russian federation, well, in fact, what happened is specialized very well, that is in any case, we need to talk, but uh, already the carrier, and many of the analysts and i personally did not have a high opinion in order to achieve something, so there are too many different positions, and let's say erdogan's proposal to that that hmm, turkey is ready to act as such a mediator. for talks, it is stable, this is not something completely new. turkey is really ready for this. in that, the immediate interests of autogan are, but again, so far there is nothing to really talk about. his idea is that what can not be completed with the already non-existent agreements regarding

ukrainian grain exports, yes, this is extremely. such a point thing, yes, which is quite difficult to develop into some kind of absolutely painful agreement. but nevertheless, what was important here is that, er, we are looking for such small points where uh where we can cooperate more with turkey and, well, not absolutely convince them to take our side. in my opinion, this is a problematic issue. but nevertheless, add more documents why it is worth cooperating more with ukraine, and you know so , that is, for example, the declared agreement on the restoration of ukraine to where should turkey join, so once again the question of greater control over exports and expansion of grain exports. so these are all such small dots that will take quite long negotiations and will give us such a close position

in cooperation with turkey, once again globally, we can see even from these statements, which were quite friendly both on the part of the ukrainian authorities and, again, on the part of the un secretary, on the part of the turkish authorities. yes, but they put too much of such a breakthrough specifics thanks to vitaliy, just now on the air with olga budnyk, we talked about what role turkey would like to take for itself in the new beautiful world. as they say, she noted that turkey in general emphasizes the need to reform international organizations in particular organizations of the united nations and perhaps m.m. see for themselves in the future exactly the role of a permanent mediator, a coordinator somewhere in something, and a constructive participant as a

third party in any situation. please tell me what you think of yesterday's visit and in the context of erdoğan and in the context of guterres, what he gave us. well, let's start with the role of turkey, how ivan tries himself, it's not just a predecessor, and by and large , turkey controls the world, taking into account its own interests, it's actually the ottoman empire 2:0 has its own interests. well, the so -called region in the far east, accordingly, ukrainian is an instrument of influence of turkey , its neighbors, it decides who together is in north africa. of turkey and it wants to

expand it, the second position is that turkey is building new security into reality after the war with ukraine, russia and ukraine, respectively, it wants to be a mediator and the one who will to act as a mediator not only in the regulation of conflicts, but to be such a patron of this security environment in the black sea, and it is clear that in this game, tools such as the un, the international cross, and humanitarian cases are therefore important the negotiating element in lviv was issues including the exchange of prisoners of war. it is no secret that the grain agreement has a second part of the humanitarian case, which is not public and where the question of the exchange of prisoners, in particular by our defenders, is foreseen. was also the subject of negotiations. therefore, this visit is true. i agree that it was not possible to talk

about any framework agreements on peace or a truce . neither ukraine nor russia is ready for such negotiations. for such framework agreements, there are no prerequisites for conducting negotiations regarding such a council . agreements but with regard to localities related to the solution of humanitarian issues, issues related to ensuring the security of grain corridors, issues related to the intensity of hostilities in zones that carry potential man-made risks for everything of the region, in particular, the zaporizhia nuclear power station is a chemical enterprise, it is a question of energy security, in particular, oil pipelines, gas pipelines that pass through ukraine, ammonia pipelines, the safety of which concerns not only ukraine or russia, but the entire black sea coast, so from this point of view, this visit is indeed a positive phenomenon from him we should not have expected any e-e initiatives of more specific or there formulations

of the so-called framework agreement or cease-fire. and the fact that turkey continues this scientific diplomacy is trying to create conditions for the meeting of the presidents of ukraine and russia and the signing of some elements that could be considered as er or the termination of the hot phase or a ceasefire or some other er formulations really turkey is trying to do this at least three such media outlets had a lot of information on this topic was even thrown into some wording of possible documents that the body brought to kyiv, but they are all on time. and in fact, i would consider the result of this meeting to be a really successful outcome, and not the aggravation of the situation around the zaporizhzhia nuclear plant power plant, i will just remind you that the main intelligence agency warned that today the russian federation can plan there as a provocation, they

argued why exactly this could be, and the president of ukraine, volodymyr zelenskyi, actually asked secretary general guterres to have the un take responsibility for at least the troll, if possible, for e- organization of the mission together with the zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant store. i don't know if mr. guterish took this responsibility, but mr. dmytro, it's zaporizhia nuclear power plant power plant in the context of international politics now, how important is this factor and how much is the world's attention now focused on this distance? that is , we understand these risks and they cannot go as they are . there have been some such reports of non -occurrence, so ecologists, what could some potential explosions mean, however i would not say that it is possible to move something too strongly, because it

depends on russia's position . in fact, even before this meeting in lviv, russia stated that no, it does not want to see god. that it is too risky and all sorts of other nonsense was declared. and here, in essence, the question was that how can we even ensure the promotion of this mission so many are present or review their e actually zaporizhzhia and it is quite true that this very meeting in lviv in particular this question was really considered and one of the questions is that we can propose some kind of policy of small steps in order to be able to convince putin of the permissibility. did we manage to find something well, so far we do not see at least i have not seen such a of information, but it is obvious that there was talk about

the fact that the arc can take on one of these kings in order to convince putin to at least allow the mission to have a regarding the international review of this issue. yes, this is one of the points, but unfortunately it is not such that there captures absolutely all the media. that is, she appears from time to time and makes arguments. but it seems to me that what needs to be done, in your opinion, is it good or bad? i just remember with a cold sweat that chernobyl was captured by the russians, and then, to be honest, somewhere in my the head had such a dilemma. if we cover it very fairly and honorably and emphasize that such a very sensitive object is captured and is under occupation, then on the one hand we will draw the world's attention even more to the specific object and to our problem in general on the

other hand, we can, let's say, cause a backlash when, under the threat of some emergency situation of peaceful atom getting out of control, the whole world will begin to sit us down at the negotiating table with the russian federation and will force us to make concessions, realizing that russia will not do this. what to do with such cases as chernobyl, as with the npp, to us, in particular, to the media, dmytro, to advise you, in my opinion , it is necessary to speak. that is, everyone understands that this can be a very big threat, and so far, despite it, again all the speculations surrounding those issues and fears of some kind of new nuclear war or nuclear winter have not yet brought us to the negotiating table when we would have made concessions, and here are the results of the meeting in lviv clearly show

this. yes that russia will be quite comfortable on this, they speculated that's why, of course, it is necessary to draw attention, thank you, there is actually another informational excuse, we talked here about the prospects of any negotiations between the zelenskyi putin, erdogan has such an idea, i think there is such an ambition, that's all - still gather them together, but it can happen already in november. as far as i understand, it is not what you are talking about, it will be some kind of targeted meeting, but they may well meet on the same platform, because the president of russia, vladimir putin, intends to to personally attend the g20 summit, it will be held on november 15-16, 2022 on the indonesian island of bali, about the fact that putin has agreed to personally attend this summit, the president of indonesia, jokowi dodo, told the bloomberg agency that the

president of ukraine, volodymyr zelenskyi, was also invited there. we have known this for several months now, and here is a question for you. can we expect it in november? well, i don’t know how to talk through the teeth somewhere on the sidelines of two volodymyrs, but from completely different worlds and, in general, understandings of good and evil let's start with the fact that the official statement from the russian foreign ministry about the participation of putin or piskov is not there. the first and second positions are that putin should go to this summit with some new geographical reality that he can sell to the world. this could be the exit of the russians to the administrative borders of donbas it can be the so -called referendums in the south of ukraine and then with this hundred points of view of geopolitical reality can come to the summit and present it as a new reality of some kind the world must agree to or start a

negotiation process with it, that is, in fact, for ukraine, then negotiations do not make any sense on the ball, this is the position with such a negotiating position of the russian federation, on the other hand, i do not see fractures, a fracture, a qualitative fracture in the war, for ukraine to have such a negotiating, such a strong negotiating position, and on the other hand, the russians do not yet have this strong the race for position ago the meeting of the two presidents of ukraine and russia at the ball is now in great doubt, i have little faith in the possibility of such negotiations in november, but the fact that they can take place in the same turkey and completely it is possible, but it is possible already in a sufficiently distant perspective, it will depend to a large extent on the departure of military operations on the fronts, whether the russians will be able to achieve at least their tactical so-called victory in quotation marks, the exit to the admin border, but the universe is similar to the fact that they it will not be possible until

november, not until october, putin's tasks were previously set before his supporters because, accordingly, putin himself will have few enough arguments for a successful political bargain at the ball during the g20, in addition, lavrov's visit to the summit of the ministers of foreign affairs, which precedes the one of the presidents, in donez, showed that they do not want to talk with the russians about matters of principle , moreover, they do not want to talk about any peace agreements or fulfill the ultimatums of the russians, and they did not receive a laurel - a decent discussion, even a tough conversation, if it will be expected of putin, then i just don't see the point in him going there. thank you , mr. dmytro, november, the summit of the g20, two invited uh, the president of ukraine and the russian

federation, so far, uh, only the president of indonesia videodom signals to us that putin will be personally present at this summit, but uh, there are prospects for some face-to-face betting, uh, in your opinion. well, first of all, the question is why putin can participate in such events at all. well, that is, a completely isolated person a completely isolated country, why should he be present there where, in principle, everyone hates him or, well, at least they treat him badly well, another question is whether at least some real rate is possible well, i agree with the fact that the delivery is very good so far we call it that is there any way that the conversation is very little likely uh, on the other hand, there is still a lot of time, and that is, it will depend on how it will

turn out. many have enough of such a neutral position and multi-industry cooperation on a number of issues, but on the other hand , it is necessary again, er, for internal use, so it is necessary to show the russians themselves what they are seeing. we can all impose our own policy. we can press one way or another they may succeed, there are many who do not agree, there are many who have such an anti-western , anti-american position, and we will be friends with them. therefore, it is not completely hopeless, so from such an advertising block for the road, thank you, er, today we learned about the fact that the united states of america can announce a new aid package for us in the amount of approximately 800 million dollars is significant and we are waiting for perhaps some

decipherment of what may be included in this a-a package however, literally a few days more than two dozen rather important diplomats , military personnel, military experts, ex-officials of the u.s. they turned to the administration of joseph biden with a message of arming and ukraine before it was too late, and they actually called to increase the number of shells for us, to increase the range of these shells, yes, this option, yes i would like to add because they realize that it is a fracture , it must be implemented right here and now, but you know, it is a very good appeal, a very open and sincere letter. but at the same time, it was not price who reacted noted that the united states provides assistance every time in accordance with the needs of the armed forces of

ukraine in this period of time. i would not like to breed any treasonous sentiments now, but this can be read . as you know. the grinding of the russian army, so be it, let it be, and as soon as it becomes not enough, we will think about it. and what can we do? maybe even more is possible . i wonder how the situation can change and whether we can turn the tide of the united states' help to us, mr. dmytro, well, first of all , you really need to understand that the united states is so absolutely supportive, and this support is really significant, but it is so partisan. it still comes, and there are several reasons, on the one hand, and

our requests that come in are considered, and then we receive one or another weapon, on the other hand, it is , again, the plans of the biden administration itself, and the third party is general sentiment. population e american and here the situation is quite transferable. recently there was a survey. i remember which harvard university there harvard harris conducted where we had three such that about 50 percent with a penny claimed that more weapons should be sent to ukraine, but only under 50% of the americans believed that that the united states is already doing a lot of this and it is better to concentrate on internal problems and before the actual elections in the european union in november, well, the administration may have to pay attention to this that's why the answer here is very simple, the better we explain and the more success we

will have on the battlefield, the more we will add to the arguments of this side, only with you parties, so help ukraine, who are lobbying for more landings, showing what we can push that is, this is not a hypothetical question, it is quite a practical question, when these weapons can really do this is the turning point. one way or another, the president of a democratic country must listen, but i would also like to note here the historical factor of some kind, but in the wake of this historical back, we will say so, taking into account the recent events in afghanistan, which are quite dramatic, and for joseph, i will go personal because all this in the end, it resulted in a drop in his rating and his support in the united states. he

really needs a victorious story somehow, and ukraine has a chance to become this victorious story, mr. congratulations , what will happen to our weapons from the united states states and will the biden administration already listen even now, despite the fact that lend-lease works only in the near future, to really authoritative leaders who call for arming until it's too late, i would put on rose-colored glasses because the united states after calling themselves or the company, let's be under the stupid criticism of the republicans - trump 's team uses the ukrainian case to maximally discredit biden’s policy in the ukrainian issue there are a lot of conservative publications in the american press about what we trade here, it turns out to be these weapons, so the situation is ambiguous, there is indeed a part of the

american society that would think that it believes that ukraine is already excessively supported, so you should not expect any a noticeable increase in the volume or not, er, some critical transition to long-range missiles, etc., it can be looked at, but not because of pressure or public opinion, but in case of operational er necessity on the fronts, when really a situation arises when these weapons are needed and will be critical and their use ukraine will receive a strategic nomination and this will be the turning point of the entire war in my opinion . there is certain control over the range of e-e

strikes inflicted e-e constantly we hear that washington e-e would not want their equipment to be used for strikes directly on the territory of the russian federation at the border of 1991 , that is, many other things that are unpleasant for us for ukraine, although it is really under the formation of public opinion in the united states under work with various groups of critics, republicans, trumpists, and critics of biden, it would be worth paying attention to work in this direction, and it will depend on how stable the operational support of ukraine in the congress and death rest in peace read well, and finally, dear guests, i will very briefly remind you that in the united states, the president is still hesitating about the decision to recognize the russian federation as a country and sponsor terrorism, and only in the united states, such a

decision has certain legal consequences, as we are aware, and at the same time, the politico state department writes that the state department is afraid that the declaration of the russian federation as a sponsor of terrorism could jeopardize the grain agreement. it took months to reach this agreement, but put the black sea eases the global food freeze a little, but there are no guarantees that russia will continue to fulfill its obligations if, in the end , russia is recognized as a state sponsor of terrorism . officials of the state department conveyed these concerns to the congress in just a few minutes, so they will still be able to recognize russia as a sponsor of terrorism, and then other countries that cooperate with russia will also feel this russian status of mr. dmitry, the country, but its companies. this is the most important this is how companies only trade. that is, it will be a trademark, it will be a complete ban, this is the

most important aspect, eh. i think that this issue will now be considered in the congresses in the lower house, so it will be successful enough or not will biden sign it, or rather when he signs it? yes , i think it will still happen. this is the question. it may be delayed a little, but regarding the argument of the state department, well , look at us. we have no guarantee that not now russia. i am simply without recognition. we will not continue to fire at the status of terrorism, that is, there are no guarantees here. that is, such a weak argument is sufficient. let's put it this way, it seems to me that after all, we ukrainians would like the status to be absolutely recognized, because it will simply launch a huge flywheel and not only in relation to the country but also in relation to business, they have also closed the channels, but we will watch. thank you and sir. congratulations, literally, a minute for you, please. yes, i believe that it is

expected, this decision will be adopted, they really use it as a pressure tool, narcia, that is, for the last few the latest american warnings uh and pushing it to some kind of constructive dialogue but russia is not ready for partition, we see that they are shelling odesa mykolayiv, in fact there is a deadlock with grain, accordingly, they do not fulfill their obligations, disrupt the weather with the countries of north africa, they do not give us the opportunity to trade, plant grain, that is, in fact, by allegedly following the letter, they destroy the agreement itself, and therefore the united states opens its hands to adopt this decision , it will really work, it will be a powerful tool of pressure on russian companies, and where the european ones do not work, the new sanctions that were applied by the united states therefore provide double emotional mode ie without