bmd-4 engine fire from closed positions well, that is, as such, uh, write down on the artillery, not challenging, support, mr. mykola, if it were possible to distribute according to such a rating in s- ways, the impression of the enemy’s armored vehicles. this is what we considered earlier on tanks, artillery, anti-tank means, guided, unguided er kurdno-caliber machine guns, what about the destruction of armored vehicles, how is this er hierarchy of means of impression distributed according to your estimates, which means that during marches it is still artillery during direct participation in in hostilities, these anti-tank weapons, as well as our armored combat vehicles, those that we have in service, that is, a 30-millimeter cannon, are quite enough to fight with similar systems, including

infantry fighting vehicles. 3 well, we landing combat vehicles , the fourth, that's why there is a two-fold assessment depending on where the enemy uses its armored combat vehicles, you don't even have to forget about the class of armored combat vehicles. we also include multi-purpose light armored tractors, yes they are called mt-lb and mt-lbv mt-lbsh well, the enemy also uses them in mass quantities for their usefulness, and there is armor, no matter what, the frontal sheet of it is only 8 mm for us, the side is only 6 mm for us, one more thing is there in general chickens for a laugh although armored personnel carriers are also only 4 mm tool steel vyacheslav and regarding the use of anti-tank means to destroy

this category about a car in the middle category on mars guided e-e atgms stugnanjavelin unguided rpg ot what is the optimal strategy because when we saw that there javelin is used for light infantry fighting vehicles, sometimes the question arose whether the ratio of cost-effectiveness in such duels is not too much times, many times, and the reactivity of disposable anti-tank grenades, both of domestic soviet production and western, and so on, satellite dipper polymers, let’s patriotic cannon and so on and so on, but at the current stage the problem of this is that the russian bmps simply do not converge with our approaches. there is a

certain situation when they come into contact, but at least in our sector they try to use the means. a universal number of disposable grenade launchers, that is, of each type of that unit, there is an aerial one, the same for a special purpose storm just against others , a huge number of means of short-range movement, certificates to transfer equipment and some contact actions it will end for these, well, they are always with big colors, so they simply don’t get close in the turning dance , and even then, depending on it, they landed at a considerable distance and stayed there to wait for the development of the battle, that is, even 2.5 km to our positions. that’s why they didn’t approach light descriptive means that can destroy

electronic acid er-e in connection with the change of so-and-so russians, they simply do not fit at this distance, and therefore i defeat this technique is really used anti-tank missile systems and er-e, can it be said that they are what we sign a few and it is worth using them , but in fact if, during our time, the russians are going to destroy one of their defense units tomorrow, this will already significantly demotivate the enemy and they can roll back, so it is more rational to use older soviet patriarchy, for example, parrots, or those what was transferred to the western partners, for example, milan, they are capable of destroying any pmp or bmp of the russian army, not to mention apcs or mtbs or e-e wheeled

armored vehicles, there are features of tigers and so on and so on but in connection with the fact that in your specific place there may be a statement and well, it seems to me that there is no point in not shooting at the bmw because when you started to put two bmps, the machines may not go further because they see that there are anti-tank divans, that is, the situation is real for three weeks, unfortunately, the deceased comrade was noticed, he was divided into a russian tank, for others, they simply saw everything, it was the first pansion of a tank attack, they simply ran away without er, they brought him down, and therefore, if there is an opportunity to establish a precedent, then it is not necessary to maintain the number this should be done as for other means, for example artillery, but we can say that the soviet

anti-aircraft guns hold up well enough to artillery fire, again. my experience here is that i see how the bmp-1 received three close hits with 5-7 m 155 mm shells, that is, very close to being but then we left later, that is, even if the conditions are large enough, i will try the armor on it can offend the landing party, which can be a desert , and hit it there, but do not go over, which is a practically important element of a combat vehicle, and it the ability to shoot remains, the impossibility of moving, therefore, artillery is, well, let’s say so, for this purpose, energy self-aiming it or its elements, such as smart 155 on armor 2,000, if we are talking about high-precision ammunition, excaliburka, yes, it is, well , it is very close to falling from an armored unit

, then it is classic artillery, well, let’s say yes, it is not effective enough for the impression of an ermine of morning equipment, even lightly armored as the prefix pp-2 p mykola, knowing you, do you have extensive experience in the use of anti-tank weapons additional details to precisely the use of these systems in the fight against the enemy's bmp apc means that modern anti-tank guided missiles have the ability to attack either with a directed hit or to attack from above. therefore, the use of the same mlav e-e against light armored vehicles is the same mt-lb armored personnel carriers, infantry fighting vehicles, because they allow them to be hit, including due to the high-explosive action of the accumulative warhead,

so those who use mortars against light armored vehicles should always remember and not always attack them from above. is it possible to say that today the saturation of our units with anti-tank means is quite sufficient to withstand the offensive actions of the enemy and any actions that the enemy can implement there on the battlefield, or is the saturation of exactly the guided anti-tank missile systems sufficient controlled, it probably depends on how the command was able to organize the supply of anti-tank guided means directly and how it was able to organize e combat training so that the personnel of the units could learn e-e m-m high-quality use of e-e equipment why because

quite often we had when operators who used certain anti-tank guided vehicles could not hit e-e targets with the first shot , you just need to conduct regular training regularly conduct training and such components as the use of mines for ensuring the crossing of our areas of the f-e f-front using copters in these directions, how sensitive and important are they really for destroying the enemy's equipment, or are they so additional, relatively speaking, what are your assessments vyacheslav, life yesterday, the russians went to my site, they blew up on their minefields , that is, two banks, two bmps blew up on their mines, it demotivated them, and they are growing

up there someday to take it away and literally, i just returned from the operation, we are using a copter with the help of collective-uzhenko documents from the american mk-19 automatic grenade launcher, one tank is planning the pace of all that blew up on the whites, which theoretically the russians could go straight and set fire to one, let's see how serious it is, if it's not serious enough, i'll get to know it tomorrow i.e. such aids are copters they want to look specially chinese toys but early is essential to the chinese toy of the higher second model we fully enter 102 it is you there b3 i did not look at anything the video in detail i.e. the toy for 0 will be 3,000 $, but there for 3 million dollars here this is the result yes, it is not possible to base anti-tank personnel on such means but they are effective enough with

auxiliary means in a significant amount really are effective enough for further practice enough equipment as from our focus on unfortunately, the russian ones were blown up both in our copper fields and in the russian ones, that is, in principle , this is the problem of detonation of own mines. it exists because it happens very often . were pressed plastic, otherwise the equipment blew up on our battlefields, extremely interesting details, now i still wanted to move on to evaluating the samples of enemy equipment that are used on the battlefield and, first of all, whether i would like to start with the most massive machine in the ranks of the

enemy - this is the bmp-2, because actually all the main units there were equipped with this model of bro, and by the way, the largest amount of destroyed equipment there just falls on the bmp-2, mykola, your e -e evaluations of this machine, are there any new things that the russians did with this model of equipment, or is it actually a standard model and nothing special should be singled out, it means that the russians, er, perfectly understand the shortcomings that are in the bmb-2, but this is the first weak protection for of the current period of the development of armored vehicles and the second - it guides the sight of the main one that is in the bmp-2 well, there are only 6 krats in the daytime and 5 krats at night, but for a 30 mm gun, this is not enough because

aimed fire a 30 mm caliber gun can be inserted into an armored building using a similar technique at a range of up to 2 km, and since high-explosive shells can in principle be inserted at a range of up to 3 km, but the sight of the e-e does not allow you to realize all the capabilities of the gun that's why the russians went a bit of modernism to modernize the bmp-1 by installing a turret there btr-82 armored personnel carrier. but the so-called modernized bmp-1 and bmp-2 were already seen on the bmp-2, which

is equal to the busurmans. well, no more than a hundred units of them were modernized, but they managed to light up and in the mountains suffered losses even among the sight of these machines is the best. but again, fortunately for us, there are not two 42 guns. and the 2.72 gun, and the 2.72 gun itself is inferior to the two a42 guns in terms of accuracy and accuracy, that is, it was possible to compensate for the shortcomings of the sight in at the same time, it resulted in a not entirely reasonable decision to the point that the gun has lost its capability - more likely, the weapon has lost the ability it had with the previous version vyacheslav, did you have experience of a collision with the russian bmp-2 p1, or are there any nuances in the design of additional security that

the body is trying to implement in these the most massive machines on the battlefield, let's say, direct contact combat using light anti-tank weapons did not reach this point, because now the russians, well, let's say, do not approach at close range, although there was a situation when on there were russian paratroopers who were there in a situation where they would find anti-tank weapons, one gas rpg was less than their armed ones, but they did not give the entire contact point to several deputies, for some reason, the object of the settlement was choosing positions and they believed that this would be a serious opportunity for a hare and as for the modern application , that is, let’s say, infantry transport that is unloaded at a considerable distance, then here the russians use their weapons for close combat, that is,

in fact, this is an armored vehicle and if we say about our russian bmp-1 and bmp-2, well, in principle , they have a good reservation down there, vyacheslav, the connection is a little we have a little failure there, then p- p- p- too much if we now move further along the line of enemy equipment and move first on the most powerful model in the arsenal of the russian army - this is the bmp-3, they were there, which i understand , 600 machines were made, about 80 machines were captured, if i'm not mistaken, what are your assessments of this model, what is important, what are the vulnerabilities of this machine at the same time, there are again insufficient ones armored protection in order to use the third infantry fighting vehicle when storming our

positions, because if the infantry is going, then either in front of the infantry or in the ranks of the infantry or at a distance of 200-300 well, a maximum of 400 m is the soviet statutes, these are the templates which also exist in the russian army, because the statutes have changed, but the main tactical indicators have remained practically the same or the use of the very serious advantage of the bmp holds a 100 mm 2a 70 gun and if trained crews are capable of firing at maximum range and the maximum range should be semi-direct and indirect fire up to 7 km, if there is such an opportunity, it can be used. well, it all depends on the area where the battles are fought, and

on the tactical situation and whether it is possible to use all the capabilities of confident combat equipment the machine is very serious in terms of firepower. why? because it has both a 30-millimeter automatic cannon and a 100-millimeter cannon, even though it has a low impulse, i.e., projectile flight speed it is not enough to use it as an anti-tank tool. but there are missiles that are called the arkan anti-tank guided missile, which is also launched through the barrel with a trigger and at a range of up to 4.5 km, you can also use this missile and this one there is confirmation that the enemy used the e-e bmp-1 bmp-2p3 with amphibious capabilities crossing the e-e in water obstacles

precisely at the expense of the e-e capabilities of the machine itself, because given the fact that there is an additional booking like cranes, it seems different that's it impression that this component of amphibiousness is not needed at all today. am i wrong? there were intentions and there were attempts to cross the siversky donets, including using amphibiousness and armored personnel carriers and infantry fighting vehicles, and one, two, and three other things that uh, our units tried not to give such an opportunity , but the enemy understood that without the right of heavy equipment , that is, without the crossing of tanks, it is practically impossible to achieve success as a result with artillery or other means, and there were also land mines the pontoon obstacles were destroyed, or rather the crossing, and the

equipment that tried to carry out the e-e due to its amphibiousness, the equipment burned either on one bank or on the other bank. well, that is, the enemy did not succeed, although the amphibious capabilities were used vyacheslav what are your assessments of the bmp3 and how let me explain the riddle that literally a couple of days ago, the leadership of the russian ministry of defense set the task of kurgan in this er kurgan march of the plant, the task is to switch from bmp 3 to the production of bmp-2, so how can such a collision be explained pernatik, i.e. good capabilities of the bmp-3 well, we really have to agree with mr. mykola that the bmp-street is sufficiently weakly armored, that is, let's say this is the russian way of developing the bmp, that is, if

it goes to the west. weapons and indeed in his case bmp-3 and periods 4 protection he brought er already about weapons weapons are really not done in principle but modern autoket machines they are used for a complex of faithful positions, how to do when the infantry, which was small, was fired upon. they said that they had changed there, we started cheating and found 100 -millimeter rifles, you know the ones under the bmp 3, and then it will appear that it is a bmw 4, beat them, then they found them with the help of a

key, that is, as combat orders a car with powerful weapons, which can be, but it is not necessary to take into account that the bmw 3 has a very large pan, and if we are talking about a self-propelled gun, install it there, then yes, as a personal infantry fighting vehicle, we will say yes, definitely, does it have advantages over the bmp-2, because the protection and what's in the mp3 is it in bmw it is not enough, therefore, a certain price, switch to a cheaper mass means of infantry support and transportation, i.e. bmw modern practical conditions when modern public associations of others absolutely end, you can go to them rationally because really the site and what great losses to the planet both

bmw mp3 and bmt-4 and one more moment, both of these combat vehicles are in them and when it is this ball machine is engaged because you are improving the body and filed is no longer subject to relative, that is, if you are already going to do so gasoline bmw 4 state of emergency mp3 so if it is already if it is clogged, then it can only be used in the case of bmw, that is, it is possible that this is another factor why the russians refuse mp3 in favor of bmw, but an interesting explanation is quite logical, as we can see, the enemy understands that it is necessary to look for more such repairable ones samples of equipment in view of the number of stratagems that you do not carry on the battlefield, you have already mentioned the machines there with this combat vehicles

landing 2 3 4 what is the overall assessment of this family of machines on the battlefield strengths and weaknesses in view of the use in combat actions well let's say so the russian paratroopers did not reach me, i.e. we were standing in front of them, there were quite a lot of them. there were also bmd-4 and bmw 2, but they did not dare to attack the national e-e, the neighboring infantry units now have their own experience with simple machines . - this is a fairly low e-e landing capacity, i.e. e-e these machines have a very small amount of nicotine that they can tolerate, please, secondly, this is a very weak transmission

. ignition waves can do 127 * 108, and a find, for example, we have 7x99, these machines have enough brazil even from e-e shooting behavior, that is, if we were talking about a special russian approach - it is a joke to have a reservation to cause some violations of mobility. it is at the highest level i.e., sufficiently powerful armament of the machines that supported their infantry somewhere, a stylus from afar

, they can perform if we are talking about the concept that they are in the same battle formations with by deportation, these machines were brought, so it means that if they will be used again on the day of directly supporting the infantry in the infantry line, because there will also continue to be a significant transport problem, very specific combat vehicles, which in modern conditions here we see, you know, such eh p . mykola, they talked about landing combat vehicles here in the square in kyiv, there is a burned-out bmbda-4 and it is made of aluminum, and our expert went and looked and it turns out that the aluminum armor is not homogeneous there, it is made of four aluminum plates, it is connected into a single one how to explain the design. this is the solution of the russians before the

creation of the kor that bd-4 is the most modern. in their line of dessert machines, this is the solution . 2, they pierce the first layer of armor, they partially change their direction of movement, and when they pass, they are either air or some other material, and then they meet again with the next layer of aluminum armor , here are a few such transitions into aluminum and air or aluminum, some kind of filler, after that again aluminum and again another filler or air, so

er. this is a much more powerful er, anti-armor agent than this was er, there was a monolithic plate with a thickness of about 20-25 mm of aluminum armor. and yes, these 20-25 mm in aluminum armor are spaced at a distance of 65 mm, and this strengthens the armor, the protective ability of such armor, but at the same time, the resignation said that , in principle, bmbde four is vulnerable to both sniper fire and machine gun fire, as far as these methods of destruction this road techniques well, you are used in ukrainian soldiers, so let's take into account what is on the bmw 4m, on the bmw 3m, there are modern

aiming devices - these are sights or sadima or lpd-1, where the dimensions of the head of the sight are in height more than 35 cm, i.e. more than 300 millimeters and about 250 mm in width. there are thermal imaging sights, and the bmd 4m also has a panoramic sight for the commander. and panoramic sights of the authorities at distances of up to 800 m, this is a sacred thing. and if we take into account that the calibers 23 mm and 30 mm pierce the bmw frontal armor of the bmp e-e

three and bmw 4. from a distance of more than 500 m, again, this should be used. take into account the fact that again there are on-board air shutters of the air intakes, er, er, that means the exhaust system, the injection grilles, all of these are quite vulnerable places, if you take into account that er, the gun also wants to be made of steel, but it is enough for the bullet to hit the gun and at least slightly deformed barrel, but this is quite enough for the barrel to swell after the shot is fired or, on the contrary, to break the barrel, that is, the fight with small arms against the fighting masha