to bet, well, he needed money in order to er, actually, something at home was done by the locals, of course, he describes them all as wild people who took food even from er pots, this showed that they were completely unprepared. at first they said that it was not a looter, but then it turned out that whole trucks had arrived, taking even dirty underwear, even some women's things. well, actually, let's listen to what this military man says about the locals , because he claims when he also claimed that he didn't steal anything, he wasn't a looter, he said that it was all given to a local family. well, everything was given there . the owners left. we went to them and asked for a generator. they still left. a man came up by himself . unhooked the generator. everything speaks and uses everything. we took the generator, then the boys went there to the sauna.

we didn't take anything there. we just took a bottle there. and that's all. well, in the end, this guy who was talking now and then confessed to something completely different, admitted that they were stealing, stealing, stealing some things from the locals and that he shot of local ruslan yaremchuk, journalist kateryna fomina, in principle, she is also behind this video. well, it is obvious that she sympathizes with these soldiers . she feels even more for them. of the military for the fact that he confessed to this zolochev that he will now be persecuted and they say he is almost a hero and why because he confessed in order to save his er his own i don't know the fellow colleagues who stayed behind in ukraine, he thinks that they should be withdrawn,

because the ukrainian russian army is not ready for all this, and he says that he is ready to sacrifice himself for the sake of his brothers, and this is now being carried around all of russia as just an unreal heroic act, and even it already is there is such a person who thinks that he must be saved, it is necessary to collect for legal assistance and almost turn to some foreign institutions because he must be urgently protected, and this journalist, too, even though she constantly emphasizes that she is understands all these crimes, she understands that these military men need some kind of punishment for these military men, but she also says that she does not justify them, she constantly emphasizes this, but in fact it turns out that she justifies it because a all her words boil down to that they are apparently not guilty, but everything is visible. the leadership is now their general line of whitewashing the russian

military, russian war criminals, what they say are young guys, or people who are just like in the army, and they can’t to obey and that's why they were forced to carry out these orders, the journalist says that in a peaceful life in a civilian life it is as if the guy had never done such a thing. of course, if others went to shoot people just on the streets, it would be strange at all. and she emphasizes that all this the situation is unusually complex, that it is multifaceted, and that not everything is so clear-cut, that it is not necessary to reduce everything to a black-and-white picture, and because you know, the human psyche is generally very complicated, the journalist kateryna fimena also says that they were even looking for a psychologist for this military. what are these traumatized people, they are young, they are 20 years old, and even more so, they are from depressed regions, this is danil from rubtsovsk. and this is also a hole, and what

kind of person could grow up in such conditions, they are as much victims as the ukrainian military , let's come to this question again, let's listen to this journalist, he considers himself to be murderers, he reflects on this topic, and the most difficult thing. in conversations with these soldiers, it was precisely that they find an explanation for all their actions they find an explanation for why they stole a moped, why they stole a jeep, why they took potatoes and alcohol from home, and the most terrible thing is that daniel finds an explanation for why he committed this crime, but at that moment, he really believed that that person was the third person killed on march 12, ruslan yaremchuk actually handed over the positions of the russian army, he did not hand them over to the armed forces of ukraine and ukrainian intelligence well, it seems that this military man

then says that even his hands were shaking after he killed killed this civilian but let's listen to how he talks about him, and well , from his intonations, you can understand the conclusion , will he repent of this murder, or will he continue to consider the man he killed a-ah, well, someone who is not very worthy at all who is not worthy to talk to let's listen, we speak tell the truth bitch we тебя сейчас расстреляем he is the same, well, the day before yesterday, he came from kiev, and they asked me to send the coordinates of the columns. the cartridges that you officers use are purely used and everything i tell him to go ahead, he goes ahead and i tell him to kneel and it was just a fuck and i want to tell you based on my experience of the occupation in buchi i

also met with such russian military contractors, also young guys of 22 - 23 years old, who at first also spoke very frankly with the local population because they thought they were liberators, we sincerely congratulate them and are waiting for them , so they spoke frankly about how they killed people already this past week for a week or two, they talked about the fact that we, er, one of them told me that i knocked over a man. after i evacuated literally two hours later, the same guys who seemed to be so polite already passed by me because they also thought that i was a prostitute, because i somehow spoke to them suspiciously, and therefore there was a feeling of some kind of understanding, and i these soldiers are not very clear to us, although, of course, there is some

the number of ukrainians is still tolerant about the russians and their military, so they are also scrutinizing their eyes . the channel of these important stories has, for example , the material of refugees who go to poland, otherwise , these refugees gather there not only from ukraine and russians and how there volunteers who are also from different countries from belarusians volunteers from russia volunteers how they all gather there and what a wonderful time they all have they understand each other because we are brothers, we are brotherly peoples and we will always understand each other. let's listen to an excerpt from this movie

by ukrainians. in belarusian, everything is very only. i understand it perfectly fine, and well, you can find such things at liberal changes in general, very, very often, and uh, there, too, than journalists could not always understand our hatred for the military, even they wonder why we hate them. they are just as much victims as you, and you have compassion. well, now i will remind you that we will talk about the book zov, which was written by the russian paratrooper, pavel filativ , and many ukrainians, too. those who have read this book say that it it is very useful for ukraine that they say it should be used. personally, i do not think so categorically because i have read this book and there are many different zaskhvars, now they want to translate it into some different languages ​​and this can become a big problem for us. and if we do not

to counteract this and now we are talking about another problem, already our internal one, about how gradually i will not be afraid of this phrase, uh, i will not be afraid of this phrase , and ukrainian culture has been collapsing over the past few years. the fact is that ukrainian cultural institutions are gradually disappearing somehow it happens in the beginning, ah, they actually destroyed the ukrainian cultural fund, it is a very young institution, but it was one of the most effective, one of the most transparent institutions, you could come there for a competition and to win a grant for a play for a book for anything artistic and for a film and well actually, everyone was satisfied, but then somehow it happened that this institution is not functioning now, there is

no director competition, it looks like a real circus, the same can be said about the state the film agency is an agency, an institution that not only finances ukrainian films, but in principle determines the policy of cinematographic ukraine, and we remember that around 2014, in particular, thanks to the state cinema in there were a lot of ukrainian films , there was even a boom in ukrainian cinema, now they say that there is no money for cinema, and already in the ukrainian film community there have been conversations about the tight-knit people that our ukrainian cinema will end up at the level of the 90s, if you remember the scandals with contests for e the position of director of the general director of the art arsenal in kyiv, this is one of the largest museums that organizes wonderful exhibitions and is very crowded. this is a very popular place, a very efficient place, and there i even wanted to become a director

mykhailo kulynyak is the minister of culture during azarov's time and, of course, culturally, the community began to oppose this. but again, the question is why are there constant scandals with cultural institutions in the last 2-3 years? and now i want to show you a film that you are wonderful. you know , it's called behind two hares, and in 1961, i think you love it . differently and precisely ivan kozlenko, the deputy general director of the dovzhenka center, told about this original track at the time, and he told this story in general, why was it then positioned as a

russian-language film, let's watch an excerpt, let's remind ourselves, and when a person is a dream , he watches his conditions are behind the clouds and there his mind becomes he will look even higher at the olavisk bell tower when he will look down there at the people a little bit, this is one as if i will fall like a chair a-a this tape the dovzhenka center a-a included his er-e his the rating of the greatest films of ukraine of all times and peoples was asked for this by a huge number of film critics and film connoisseurs, and the trouble and the scandal is that this film we can lose like the other 10,000 ukrainian films, and all because the

state cinema wanted to liquidate the dovzhenka center dovzhenko center, although the state cinema says that it is not about liquidation, it is about er reconstruction, just a change of certain work, but dovzhenko center and almost the entire cultural community claim that no, this is exactly destruction, liquidation is also it's about our favorite cartoons now, too. we can see them, it's all produced by the ukrainian animation studio and cartoons by david cherkassky, there's a doctor, it hurts, and treasure island about captain vrungel - this is cartoons about cossacks, they're all too , well, their fate let's say so under a big question because they want to separate the ukrainian animation studio, which is now also in the context of the dovzhenka center, claiming that they want to urgently develop animation during the war. and what is absolutely strange because, well, now the minister of culture said in general

that there is no money for cinema and here if suddenly we want to develop animated cartoons, which have hardly been paid attention to in recent years. and the question of the state cinema. why do they want to reform - reform the dovzhenka center by creating three at once from one institution because all the archives in dovzhenka of the center is its main function is to store archives. now we can watch an excerpt from this excerpt. so if you go to the youtube channel ukraineira, you will see videos of a film about dovzhenka, which i ... they shot and there is a huge number of these films that are in special archives. so now you will be able to see them. each of these boxes that you will see now contains a film of films that dzygav was playing or oleksandr dovzhenko, that is, all of our enormous possessions are in these boxes and if these boxes, god forbid

they transfer to some other place some other structure of the office. i don't know people who don't know how to do this because specialists keep it, then it will all just die and why did it need to be done because they want to transfer all of this to the scientific center of cinematography of ukraine, this is some kind of institution that almost no one has heard of, it was created in 2011 and has not been functioning since then, and now they say that it needs to be transferred, and all the treasures are the main problem how do we understand that if someone needed some land or some building that stands in a very nice place, maybe the developers want to do something there, maybe they want to do some a-a residential complex or a shopping center . well, that's how it turned out now, because now we can to see what will be possible on the site of the dovzhenka center, which is located near the

holosiivska metro station, we can see now the residential complex called white lines. here it is, and here is the dovzhenka center - this is the building closest to us, low-rise, but a little smaller, this is the dovzhenka center and with it seems that they want to make it just such an annex, part of this residential complex, in which there will be, well , accordingly, some supermarkets, shops, etc. and so on. take care of this whole situation, i want to quote what it says that a former employee of this company, on the condition of anonymity, told lb that as early as the summer of 21, the company knew that they would forget this area of ​​the dovzhenka center and that there was no agreement within the company. that's why we are waiting for the shopping center, by the way, now such a graphic has already appeared on the website of this company, and there is already a

dovzhenka center, we see a completely different one, as the developers say in one of the comments. i found their position that they seem to spend money on to decorate the facade of the dovzhenka center to beautify it , and what, on the contrary, they care about culture, well, in general, we asked the head of the state cinema, maryna kudarchuk, for a comment, but she did not answer us. she gave comments on this national marathon, a joint marathon, and in general, she is famous for some scandalous behavior, scandalous interviews and a scandalous appointment, and she is called a person in the film industry and completely incompetent, because she was really engaged in her appointment to the head of the state cinema with taxes, for example. yes, it's about ecology, she doesn't give us comments, but she gives us a comment. olena honcharuk,

acting director, dovzhenka of the center . now we will talk with her and try to find out what the problem is, because many people really i don't understand olena, i congratulate you. good afternoon, i can't hear you well, but can you tell our viewers everything, why is this concern so deep, and yours and some kind of community in general, the artistic community that is active now? supports what will happen to our favorite films, what else can happen to him to understand and actually the wave of information that rose after our statement, it demonstrates that society is worried and still understands the value of

what is called cultural heritage, actually our reaction was caused by the fact that the main goal of the dovzhenko center's activity is to work with cinematographic heritage, to preserve it, to develop it, to multiply it, to restore it, to talk about it, and the center seems to be successfully for several years, and any threat , especially in the current war conditions for cultural heritage, i am not talking only about cinema, because we are now seeing some losses every day, and if these losses are caused by non-professionals, then it is simply a crime, so we strive to question decided in such a way that the film museum funds

of the dovzhenko center were preserved so that the collection was complete and nothing threatened if legislative levers were needed for this. i think that they should work on this because our legislation unfortunately, they are very imperfect, and the fact that in 28 years the dovzhenko center has not acquired the status of a state film fund endangers not only its activities, but also the funds that we keep, these are films, posters, scripts, illustrations and equipment storyboards, but this generally endangers the entire cultural heritage, so i see a solution in the legislative field first of all, but for this order, see a lot of talk about

here is this developer who said, well, of course, your building in such a place is a sin no to build some kind of shopping center because there is a large flow of people there and it has long been said that what is this building, well, people have been looking at this building for a long time and it seems that everything looks like that you are really deprived of all important functions there, your collection is transferred to another place and then your building can be demolished there, there is nothing. how to deal with this threat, cooperation with any private churchmen, especially if it is married with self-standing ones that belong to the state , is always difficult, and in this sense, there is a lot problems are also laid down in our legislation

, now many points have not been clarified that influenced the decision calmly, or i will remind you that the trigger was still the order that issued the doshkinok on the reorganization of the dovzhenko center, but the community drew attention to the fact that next to the center e-e are being built it's a residential complex and it causes concern among many, the developer, i have to say that i remember this story, plus in the 17th year, when construction began, i wasn't there then, i was the head of the cinema museum then, and he made proposals to make an improvement for the center, in particular, on the tenant, where we still see the usual facade, but in a different decoration and it is recognizable, this was really a compromise option, and which ivan kozlenko insisted on, and we considered this design

together with the team and the developer has always declared respect for the borders of the center and for the centers of the center . last year, why am i talking about the imperfection? the facade and also the improvement of the condition of the shelter, which is on the balance sheet of the center, and this has now become just critically relevant, and we have sent the draft investment agreement to the ministry, it has been considered since the end of the 20th year. at first, the ministry wanted to give permits on its own, then we decided that it was not within its competence and the contract was transferred to the cabinet of ministers because all investment contracts are approved by the cabinet of ministers and to what extent well, as we see, the project was not implemented, time is running out

, unfortunately, we must build to monitor your situation further and i think that our cultural community is, in principle, united quite well now and we defend this institution thank you olena olena goncharuk acting director of the dovzhenka center which i am now trying to liquidate whether it is to reorganize it, each side interprets it in its own way, but now i want to talk about this book zov for the last time, because i consider it very important, because even the ukrainian media are starting to talk about the author of this book as almost a hero e- it is about such a thing paratrooper pavel filatev, who wrote the book " zov", it is written in latin, he was fighting in the kherson region. here he is, and then he went to him, he was wounded, he was wounded, and he decided to

write a book about the whole truth about russia, and i also have a lot of thoughts i heard that the book is very beneficial for us, because the author really writes the incredible truth about the russian army, about its unpreparedness, about its weakness, about the fact that everything heroic is a thing of the past, and about the fact that, actually, it is useless now not capable and if this book is read by people who want to sign a contract with the russian army and fight in ukraine, then there is a chance that they will change their minds, because this is how the author describes the attitude towards the military , that they do not really want to go there. that they do not issue various compensations and so on and so on. however, it is bad for us that the author justifies the russian army, he shifts all the blame to some top leadership and says that he has not seen any such evil soldiers if they

they treated the prisoners of war perfectly and that they treated the civilians perfectly and he did not see or hear of any atrocities. for putin's army, beautiful whores, while we were there not understanding why and why they die, receiving mutilations and enduring what they cannot imagine in a peaceful life, you called us putin's army, we are not putin's army, we are the army of russia and we took an oath to the people of russia, and you are the one who carries the passport of the russian federation and is russia, if you could not collect your eggs in a heap and go with other people to demand from the government that you elected to cancel the war, then all this is bullshit and on your

hands russia is not putin russia people with passports of the russian federation well , in the same way pavel filadyev emphasizes the fact that the russian military are not even civilians, russian military are almost not guilty of anything, they are simply victims of this whole regime themselves, and he is very first of all, the book is quite illiterately written. i have many mistakes in him and he himself admits that he he is not very educated and he is very confused in his statements, on the one hand he says that absolutely no one needs this war, it is necessary to get involved with it , on the other hand, he reproaches his fellow citizens who actually drive with the letters z that they should go to war and he also blames ukraine. ukraine is to blame for fomenting hatred against russians for eight years and saying that they too are beasts, that they are not human, that they attacked about some kind of imaginary

war, and they talked about it in ukraine, and that's why ukraine it is to blame for the fact that it is based on russia, this is the conclusion, i will remind you that the book is going to be translated into some foreign languages, not russian, and also these rules of philatev are being dragged around ukrainian media, youtube channels, er, the youtube channel of the odesa film studio has an interview with him, that's why it's big the question to the ukrainian media is the same, i have all my friends, we will meet you in a week with new cultural betrayals. continue to watch with the press, big creatures, they hunt washing machines. online at hotline finance hotline finance insurance of course online our ukrainian temporarily occupied

cities of heroes ukrainians in occupation are heroically resisting the enemy and waiting for the day of liberation support their people join the flash mob with the hashtag cities of heroes write about occupied cities in social networks and become their geolocation in posts publish a photo with a yellow ribbon is a symbol of support for people in the occupation ukrainians will go to war, support the city of heroes so that ukrainians don't think about it, so that they don't talk in the first place anyway war is coming, war is our victory, seven days a week from monday to sunday, seven different spheres of human activity, sports, culture, politics, eight expresso presenters, journalists, experts, opinion leaders in real time about the most relevant events

through the prism of war, every day, author's projects, the most espresso, more than 150 days without a day off at the front line 103 units of captured enemy equipment tankist yevgeny is getting closer to victory every day and every day he says i am not tired i am not tired defending ukraine i congratulate andriy yanitsky this is espresso tv channel today we have an extraordinary guest interview on the tv channel sir geoffrey nice, he has been practicing law since 1971