assembly pontoon across siversky, where once in a day they burned almost the entire battalion tactical group and in one place, i emphasize in one place, they did sweat five times, which is a violation of common sense in general. not to mention some kind of military skill. but again despite these considerations, i would underestimate the enemy, therefore, they can strike at any point where this point will be, well, it is almost impossible to predict, your logical and correct opinion is around avdiivka, why, after all, the donetsk plan for them should have been more strategic, because they said that they should reach the administrative borders of the donetsk region, will it be possible in my opinion now, no, we ukrainians have seized the strategic initiative not to confuse the fracture with the fracture, and the fracture is still quite far away, and these point strikes will now be the main

philosophy of this war on demarcation line viktor what do you think about the prospects of sub-radiovka and bakhmut well, that's all we said that he, well, look at the russians, in principle, it's still quite noticeable how they move troops, how they are accumulating forces in certain areas, and he will write about this, and you can draw certain conclusions, of course, if they took away a part of the troops from the kharkiv direction or transferred them to donetsk, then this indicates something from the other side. that they are trying to introduce aesthetic reserves in the east of ukraine also indicates something. so now, in my opinion, the main direction in the pressure is the avdiiv direction, so they, after the north donets lysichan agglomeration, understandably want to take kramatorsk from

slavic people, it's a very bad idea, but they didn't give up the idea of ​​taking avdiivka, uh, taking the sand became painful for us psychologically, but for them physically, because there were a lot of them, but less because they actively use in the donetsk region, mobilized from among the actual residents of the occupied territory to them, well, they somehow compensate for it, they somehow we drag it, so yes, now they will wash it on the car, but in principle, the good news is that avdiivka is quite a protected city, well, i was there, i know. i was there in the 16th year therefore, of course, from another point of view, this will mean that they will again try to use their already standard tactics to simply station the artillery here. the question is how much we can counter this, how much our same long arm can provide them with a certain hunger, namely,

shells directly on the demarcation line, i am not sure about this, but i think that avdiivka is an extract. i think that there will be problems with the car, another matter, what a pity, the city is another matter. it was located, it was also significant for us, that's why , unfortunately, we have such a war, uh, such and such are the directions of resistance in us now, now it's the same, it's also a pity the situation in the same energodar, it's also a pity kherson and kharkiv, i.e. look, let's understand that it is difficult to take an audio player there. but if, for example, we lose it, is it really such a strategic point as the russians want it to be, because for them it is, well, 100% for them it is a strategic point. they

are now trying to portray it as some kind of direct i know the battle of stalingrad is another one of them from time to time such a comparison comes up, it’s like that again , is it true viktor, what do you think he really is? no, their goal is not to simply push our people away from donetsk, uh, in principle, they partially started to deal with it, because if pisky was right on the border cities, now they have moved ours a little, of course, avdiivka is even further away from the sad ones, it may be possible to encroach on bakhmut by then, yes, but completely squeeze out the ukrainians from the donetsk region. well, this is still a very distant plan, but any kind of displacement it is from donetsk let's say it expands them both operational capabilities and propaganda capabilities, it allows them not to say that here we have fulfilled our main

strategic political goal, we saved the residents of donbas from kyiv khuta, especially the technical residents of the city whom we completely destroyed, but what will you do? well, i don't think that avdiivka - it is actually such a principled stalingrad if you take just my assessment, but again, it was painful for us, and this is due to their propaganda capabilities. it could be sold how great is the victory of the devil - this is one such point, not the south, now such a point is looming energodar eh, by and large the shelling is a provocation, i.e. what do they want to achieve with this

military plan, i.e. what kind of politics do we all understand, show there that the ukrainians are creating a nuclear threat, this thing has not passed, no one blames the ukrainians, everyone practically all the world blames russia for the fact that there is a threat there. but nevertheless, what military position can be decided? tell me, mr. chernyk. what do you think? well , there is nothing particularly special here, if we consider it a nuclear power plant, then it is an ordinary demarcation line like all 1,140 km front as such , in truth, you very rightly noted that there is nuclear blackmail here and it is really primarily aimed at our western allies, russia is actually collapsing in this military operation. i very correctly and firmly express my point of view, friend the army of the world is not capable of inflicting a military defeat

on the 22nd army of the world. the moscow elites soberly understand that if they lose a classic war, let's say their lieutenant himself will definitely not stay alive. and this state will be on the path of its final collapse, they are very well aware of this, so they are looking for all possible arguments and ways pressure to actually find some points of contact for negotiations with the west, primarily with the united states of america. because in fact, they are still fighting with ukraine, they are fighting with nato, so everything that is happening around energy donation and nuclear power plant is nothing but terrorist blackmail in my opinion, the first round and ukraine and the west won, i.e. signaling the west that if there is a serious radiation leak there, the fifth article of nato will come into effect - this is a pretty serious argument, but in my opinion

a repeat second and that third round is also possible, our opponent is incredibly mean and he can give in to any blackmail. well, if you try to predict now, we still have . literally today, the statement of the minister of defense of ukraine, oleksiy reznikov, in an interview with the snn, where he stated that the worst scenario of a military invasion is already behind us, we are at the stage of stabilization of the entire battlefield or front line with a small movement of units, and we have made many good deterrents there. ukraine is on the threshold of the new stage of the war, the armed forces of ukraine launched a counteroffensive, as he said in another direction.

the next stage of the war, after what we had before this stage, let's go. well, i guess we 'll start with you, mr. trigubov, so that you're smiling like that, so tell me what might happen in the new stage of the war, i ca n't predict it because i can't predict what powers will be used, well seriously, because i would now see in the enemy a completely unconcealed confusion of misunderstanding that, first of all, in the political goals you set before yourself in this conflict. well, if there was a political goal actually to change the ukrainian government to a loyal and sterilization of ukraine, it is absolutely clear that this will not be absolutely the case. in other words, it is not even only on ukraine, it depends on the world whether the political goal is to fix this front line, which is now such a permanent line

of demarcation and, for example, to fix it for a couple of years in order to to gain new strength there for a new offensive, which is not a political goal of its own, it is not fulfilled why because you do not fix it, you are now asking them that i am going to actually maintain the intensity of the conflict, which is currently ongoing it’s been a few years. it’s impossible. do they hope that they will now say that we are all at home and the ukrainians will stop trying to compete? it’s also impossible. do they hope that the ukrainians will be forced to do this and the peace will last and it’s impossible. it’s impossible now to stabilize the line. the front over the e-e along the line of demarcation that exists because we actually still have an active phase of the conflict; moreover, the ukrainian army is also pressing in various directions, the ukrainian army is also improving its capabilities e-e, including

for counterstupa and well, it's still something to hope that in the process of an already active fierce fight on the street when the walkers of the oven have already left, the referee will run over and say bradbury broke up, did i break up at all ? well, they look at everything, you can see that they really hope that a cold winter is an economic problem in ukraine and maybe in europe, they will stop something there, they will stop some determination to help ukraine. well, how do you assess that these expectations are because well, i really don’t see any more expectations from the russians than this one. well, i’m sorry that they will stop, they will stop the supply of weapons to ukraine, which has already been actually allocated, paid for the move, where no, they will stop me like nothing from such an employee of the armed forces of ukraine and they stop

uh they will not stop the attempts of the ukrainians to buy this or that territory, no, no, they will not stop. well, in what way is the cold winter? well, it can technically interfere with me. capabilities well, it will interfere, but russia is interfering with us here now, so i don’t think it’s possible to just take you now and stop and freeze the whole fight like a letter in amber, i’ll rewrite amber the parties are completely exhausted when both parties cannot build up their own potential or believe that they simply need to part ways. and now i am at such a moment, and the russians have no way to provoke such a moment, to force us to say oh well, well, let's part ways. for they should have made a serious

strategic impression on us, as it was during the minsk uh-uh agreements, uh-uh, we need ilovaisk and debaltsevo, they are not able to set it up now, well, at least ok now, in the near future, maybe they can organize something there now, they will mobilize 100 thousand 500 million uh, the cotton workers in ustyud and then they will be able to, but now, as of august 24, 2022, i don’t see such a development of events. maybe there is, but i don’t see it, mr. chernenko, what do you think about the stabilization of the line of uh, the entire front, and well, us i don't really like the stabilization, the truth is we don't need the line to stabilize and all we need is for our advantage to be our advantage at some point. so when this advantage of ours may not be heard you are not heard now buy me you hear me

students in the strategic conclusion we have there is no other goal than to finally and finally knock out the enemy from all our territories, i emphasize with all the screams included, i do not allow at all, i do not believe that there are any diplomatic levers for the settlement of this conflict, nor does this conflict end exclusively with the force of arms is not different, the question is not different, only when and in what way - it will happen here, you really have to be very careful and you cannot underestimate the enemy, i share the opinion of my colleague that they do not have serious resources for major offensives at the moment, but i will remind you of this first country in the world in terms of reserves of artillery working barrels , they currently reach about four and a half thousand. and if you also take into account what they have in warehouses, then there are much more shells for these working barrels, a practical limit, that is, it

almost inexhaustible and to set up large barrages of fire that we will not be able to overcome, this is a completely working scheme, let me remind you that the territory is either liberated or occupied only when the foot of an infantryman has set foot there, it is no different in my opinion. along which it is very difficult for me to say, and a certain operational pause is possible, which can last up to six months, and in fact, the course of the war, purely in the military part, will help us to seriously break the nato aviation, i am an ardent supporter of such aviation e-e as f-16 or let's say f-15 of american production. although the swedish griffin and the french rafal are also quite suitable, you conditionally understand the situation when you talk about aviation, why aviation? explain your

opinion in more detail. in the second world war, what aviation is a modern cavalry, aviation is capable of delivering a wide variety of strikes in the mode of air, surface , and here, the line of weapons in nato in difficult countries is quite large, let's say their most famous missile hey, the ahm65 maverick has tremendous great qualities that can destroy practically everything from concentrations of manpower and equipment to control points, not only artillery, compared to artillery, aviation is much more maneuverable, but it must necessarily be accompanied by electronic warfare in order to qualitatively exclude their and their air defense system plus already a lot has been said about the famous a 10 thunderbolt

, the so-called wart, an incredibly successful machine, an analogue of the su-25, yes, this machine is designed to kill tanks, it has a serious reputation 30-millimeter six-barreled e-e gau8 with enormous speed and a serious ammunition load of up to one and a half thousand with a total bomb load of up to 7 tons , such machines can significantly speed up the destruction of the enemy, in my opinion, lend-lease allows them to be provided and i hope that we will have them by the middle of the end of autumn will appear, and then it will really be possible to cautiously and optimistically talk about more serious counteroffensive actions, in contrast to the fact that i am now still my opinion. that is, you think that the saturation is even greater on the ukrainian side with artillery will not solve this issue, because so far it looks like receiving aviation from our

allies is still enough, well, let's put it this way: so far, they have not expressed readiness to supply it is it likely that we will still receive artillery? is it not possible to solve all the tasks simply with more artillery? but again, we should not fall into the illusion that it is sad that they will give us, i guess that the us army has only 1,000 ss artillery barrels of caliber 155 in service mm well, it won't be like that, the americans will take half of it and give it to ukraine, what won't happen, they put it on the assembly line for the production of new weapons, but it's time, and it's not one, not two, or three months. regarding aviation, i would like to discuss with you a little information about the fact that the congress the usa has allocated 100 million dollars for the training of ukrainian pilots - this is reliable information at which stage this phase is. well, if

our military-political leadership and the americans believe that a certain veil should be lowered over this issue, then let it remain so, however in my opinion yes, i believe that sooner or later the point of providing aviation will come and i would know. i did not adhere to the version that only one type of weapon can break the front. in fact, everything in the complex weighs everything up to the hand grenade, including the more systems of the most diverse class that will arrive to us, the better but we must all soberly understand that human resources are not proportional to the truth, there are 35 million of us, if there are 145 of them, and for them, too, it is existential, they will not give up without a fight, so i would very carefully, you know, talk about the fact that victory here i am not a supporter of the concept of a quick victory. if this happens, god forbid, that is, the phenomenon

of suddenness, no one has ruled them out, the black swan may fly, let's say in the form of a meteorite, to the chernobyl nuclear power plant from the time he flew there, it can also change the entire philosophy of war . happen, however, if we really want to win, we have to keep a cool mind and common sense and prepare for a grueling confrontation, then for sure well, in principle , we need to talk about what, uh, for a long time, and so on. well to be ready for a long time, that's already, well, that's what i would say. well, the general opinion, which is more or less, eh. everyone understands that it will not be one moment. and let 's put it this way, everything does not end with the end of summer. what mr. viktor said about the fact that uh, some unexpected other uh, forces can be introduced. well,

let's fantasize, today we received a very strange greeting from uh, the unrecognized belarusian president lukashenka, who suddenly decided to congratulate ukraine on independence day, tell about the peaceful the sky is about cooperation, which, well, it’s somehow absolutely parallel, he combines it with the raising of two planes, er, with missiles aimed at ukraine. i don’t know such schizophrenia, and he also somehow combines it with the fact that literally all russians say that there is no to be ukraine in general, is there still a possibility of the belarusians joining the war in such a plan, well, an assault on another one from belarus, once it is one direction, another direction, which is constantly being discussed on russian television, what or not involve north korea and north koreans in the war, viktor, what do you say about this, well, there is still

an unlimited resource of the central african republic, i don't know why they don't become it in reality, well, it's real. this is already a series of jokes. will save er, i would, i think that certain logistical problems may arise from the northern correction, and with regard to the involvement of belarus. well, we have already seen the cities from the territory of belarus, because everyone has actually seen them in much more favorable for the russians, as well as the territory of belarus, and that it ended with a very shameful defeat for them, the most shameful historical defeat so far with er many years, why should they repeat this traumatic experience er well, to be honest, i have no idea what they have now in belarus, more troops are accumulated than there were. no, even if

everywhere you are deployed to add to them with dubious combat capability, well, let's assume it is there, do they have the opportunity to do something that would not be a repetition of the actual situation in march of this year? no, february no well, it seems to me that kyiv is now no less protected than then, the ukrainian army is now no less capable of protecting it than then, their capabilities were earlier than then, so why ? scheme a second time so that they believe that they have something fundamentally new there. for example, if they try to storm from somewhere there from the south in order to support this storm by diverting it in another direction, unless it is in a terrible way again, kyiv is it will be impossible to take kyiv in this situation, because kyiv is a

very large city, a very large natural fortress , so you can definitely try to attack the sharks again, this is artillery terror, but it did not work even then, again, i am the most. i do not see what will actually change. well, maybe colleagues know something i don't know what has changed so much. in my opinion, the horse has not become less. let's say that the once-protected army has not become less combat-capable. theoretically, theoretically , on the contrary. it would be possible, relatively speaking, to exert some kind of pressure from the north as a distraction to the ukrainians uh, the troops are in other directions, but practically, once again, they are going to the same unfortunate chernobyl zone to get their x-rays, uh, and their tests. not from the ukrainian troops. well, in my opinion, this is not the worst possible scenario, mr. chernenko. what do you think, well, in the end maybe it's not good , belarus is not there, not on this side, but there is also chernihiv, sumy, uh, it doesn't stop there all the time, they

are trying to fire at something there, there are also some troops there, something else can be transferred there. how likely are these options for such an attempt well, at least a distraction in order to ease one's condition, here in the region of donetsk or the south, in this case, the great chinese military scumbag has a very good saying, i will give it as an example, you should not expect that the enemy will not attack, the enemy will attack without fail, you must do everything it is possible that when he attacks, the price for him will become incredibly high, you know. i have always tried to be a critical realist. one cannot help but evaluate the enemy. none of the methods will attack or not attack belarus. it is very difficult for me to say in land terms component but we have to emphasize that already in the fact of the war from ukraine, heavy missile strikes, primarily on western ukraine, have been carried out by belarus since the first days of the war, this is also a military

participation in the conflict. ukraine this is quite a serious force, it is a full-fledged mechanized division or three mechanized brigades, such a force cannot be taken lightly. i really share the point of view of my colleagues. that kyiv is practically impossible to take, they couldn’t then definitely not they will be able to pull over a fairly significant military group of our ukrainians, they will be able to, moreover, the belarusians should be given their due and this should be said loudly since 1991. the belarusians have quite good progress, let's say such a

reactive system of operation with the chinese, therefore it is really easy to weigh potential strikes, it is not acceptable whether they will become, i don't know, this is guessing at a coffee shop narrower, but prepare for it it is necessary to take a look as a matter of course if this is going to happen, it is more likely that it is still in the operative direction to kyiv, why there are serious natural obstacles from the side of western ukraine, the huge density of forests and the so-called pripyat swamps and only two working roads, how to beat the enemy on roads , we learned at the beginning of this war, not a passenger car, this direction is in principle and in fact thank you thank you so we can still expect some unpleasant surprises or hopes even before the end of the year let's say so from the russian troops because all around i hope ready for this well, these were petro chernyk

, military expert victor tregubov, captain of the armed forces of ukraine, our time has run out, we will meet in a week and everyone on independence day . thank you once again, 16-year-old liza mandych disappeared in the kharkiv region, a girl lived in the village of kivsharivka, which was occupied by the russians at the beginning of the war and it was then that the connection with the girl was cut off all this time without losing nadia, her friend is looking for lisa, it was she who told us the details that i hope will help in the search so, in the first days of the russian invasion liza mandych called her friend and said that she was very scared. well, that's what they said. of course, it's scary because there are planes flying there, and they're very close. well, to russia, if it was the kupyan district , liza's friend's mother also joined the search, and the woman told us what happened. there was contact with lisa only in the

first days of the war, and then it disappeared, there was no contact with her at all, she did not get anywhere, well, she did not get a job on these social networks. and for three whole months, there was no news until suddenly, at the end of may, the girl made herself known and wrote message and then she appeared suddenly on may 27 literally for 5 minutes she sent two such messages that i am in the lpr and going to a vacuum, that is, are they being taken away or are she with her parents? there is no connection with the visa. however, her friend and her mother do not stop searching and say that very important information recently appeared, which really gives hope that everything is fine with lisa, and at the same time, she did not get in touch, but her friend did i wrote her on instagram, and she did

said that liza of kivsharivka is fine with her. well , at the same time, i don't know why my friend was able to get in touch, alizen, lisa's friend also searched for a man on social networks who now lives in the occupied kivsharivka, and he also claims that he saw lisa scratching and went to her home also claims that she opened the door for him and that everything is fine with her, that is, two people have already said that lize is allegedly at home in kivsharivka, but at the moment this information is not confirmed, because at least there is no photo or video on which it would be possible to see lisa, her friend asks the residents of kivsharivka, who may see this program on social networks, to also check whether it is really climbing now in kivsharivka and