will write i will win, but i am sure that he will not be the winner, we just divide it garmash, because with us is a journalist, the president of the center for social prospects of donbass well, and a former representative of donbass in the tripartite contact group, which is now history because there are no negotiating groups anymore, there is a full-scale war which lasts for six months and we are going further, let's talk about our financial system and tax reform, because we still have to somehow survive, even though, more precisely, in parallel with the war. okay, how many states do we have there? our partners pour 3 billion euros into the budget every month. about four to five billion are poured into the budget. but we need to understand how we will continue to survive in war conditions, because this is a colossal burden on the financial system and more. let's talk with the people's deputies of ukraine - it's not a southerner, member of the committee

on finance, tax and customs policy of the council, mrs. nino, i congratulate you good day, good health, olga vasylevska smagliuk, also with us, people's deputy of ukraine, congratulations slava to ukraine and also the representative of the profile committee of this committee. well, let's talk about this tax reform announced by the government and the president's office . in particular, the radical tax reform is about reducing corporate income tax rates on the income of individuals and on value added. that is, all taxes will be equalized to 10%. . that's what you called her 10 10 ms. olga well, let's present this, these changes, these innovations. i can't quite imagine if we reduce taxes so much. and where then? in general, what will you fill to fill the budget with reminds me, do you remember gennadiy balashov was, well, there is, it seems, god bless him, he had a batch of 5-10, it was very simple, he said let's take

10% of the turnover and it will be every time, please let's all have 10 initiators of this raise twice military levy if you remember and still er normalize the fee per share from to the pre-war level and if i'm not mistaken there was also an initiative on er in order to somehow regulate those taxes and increase those that they which they do not offer to lower as far as the situation is concerned with this initiative, it is worth noting that it was not submitted to the committee, and the calculations, by the way, the society requires the calculations of this reform , and it has not yet been provided, so comment on its layout, let its author recommend there are experts, respected mykhailo the cook, andriy tlugach, and here i am i can

say how reasonable it is to do in the current conditions and what it can lead to . also, if i am not mistaken, they still offer a ten percent rate for exchange, then for imported goods also introduce, that is, some we are offered to lower taxes or raise them actually. i believe that such a reform is not right now. in the conditions of martial law, i understand that such experiments must be supported by good calculations and the appropriate position of the ministry of finance. the ministry of finance has not received these calculations at the moment, as i understand it. therefore, we will consider it an initiative of the expert group and one of the deputy heads of the president's office. that is, it is an initiative exclusively of the president's office, this reform is correct, it is an initiative of the expert group which was presented by the deputy head of the president's office,

mr. shurma, and the committee did not receive any calculations on this issue. 120 billion is needed for the army, another 120 billion is needed to finance medical teachers and so on. the national bank of ukraine, because with it we cope with the expenses that have doubled for the maintenance of our military, that is why we should think about how to encourage business, work and pay taxes, but it must be balanced after all history because, for example,

the initiators of this reform are canceled by the eus, how then will the appeal fund e-e receive funds for the payment of pensions social contribution yes e-e there are no calculations yes comment further rostyslav sturma, a well-known economist in our country the head of the president's office. they say that he can even become the prime minister. there was a lot of talk about it this summer. he was a respectable person with significant political experience. he was a deputy of the donetsk regional council in the 14th year from the party of regions, then he headed the zaporizhia regional organization, an opposition bloc, i.e. one person with good experience as a big man, is currently engaged in economic reform and claims to be the head of the government. i think that the opposition should listen to the recommendations, please have a word. well, first of all i need to clarify something, and i will start with the fact that i know rostyslav shawarma, i talk to him

, and it is absolutely obvious that this is how it turned out. some kind of unbalanced situation because, as far as you know, the head, the current head of the committee, and in general the committee, which mainly supports his decision, took a more fiscal position which led to the fact that a number of citizens and businesses are dissatisfied with what is happening in the country and they have not received what they expected from this new government , which promised a lot in the pre-election period time regarding today's day and proposal 10-10 well, unfortunately, i don't think it was necessary to declare it. if an understanding was not found between the president's office and the party, today the head of the party, the servant of the people shulyak, also made a statement

regarding this reform, and even more so the minister of the executive branch of the ministry finances of the prime minister and others because we have the most painful perception of the desire to carry out the reform and then the impossibility of even adopting it at the legislative level. i am not talking about further implementation and it seems to me that we they have already talked many times about drastic changes in the tax policy and have never implemented it to the end. and as for this proposal, for example, i would support it and i am not even interested in the calculations, because i always like the reform that you propose to reduce taxes by the ministry of finance and others will find a large number of questions in the city how to cover this temporary gap in budget revenues and what compensators

can you provide and so on, our goal is not to force people to pay taxes as soon as it happened my colleague said that to make all the conditions so that there are more opportunities and interest to work in ukraine and then they will pay taxes and pay taxes now all within the legislative field if you analyze the tax code, there are at least 10 new changes in it, such conceptual changes to tax benefits and various preferences that have been adopted over the past three years, and before that there were about ten such preferential opportunities in the tax code many years ago, our system of waste is actually distorted itself gives the opportunity to use certain

norms of the law in order to optimize the payment of taxes and that is why i say that this government could achieve much more as long as they had a majority and a monomajority and in the executive power in the legislative power it would be very good to have such an opportunity to do radical changes, but this has not been used until now, because it is necessary to do it now. i would suggest, for example, because i agree with ms. olga that it is necessary to finance a lot of expenses during the war, and by the way, we cannot always to expect the amounts of assistance that are provided to us, they arrive late and we have a huge budget deficit and funds are added every month, moreover, sometimes it is huge, that's why such inflation is rampant today, but you have to understand that now it was necessary to start a

radical reform of the tax authority, i'll tell you such a thing for the first time analyzing this last period of work of the tax service, i am for the fact that you completely liquidate the state tax service, there is the state treasury, there is the ministry of finance, and there is the ministry of economy of these bodies is enough to precisely coordinate the work in terms of tax policy, develop regulatory documents and leave business alone, because no reform to reform the tax authority has been successful. the fact that we want a service service, and it, as it was and remains a repressive body in all respects , therefore nothing terrible would happen if

the work of the tax service was radically changed now after liquidation, no successors are needed, time will tell. and that would be the expansion of taxes. what would happen and it would be the right step, a radical step towards this video. very radical mrs. olya, you would initiate the liquidation of the tax system as such and how do you see the reform? well, you know. you know . that i receive a lot of complaints from citizens about the work of the current tax service. and this also applies to the registration of tax invoices - it also applies to the return of vat and other things that are happening or not happening really now in the relationship between business and the tax service, in my opinion, has deteriorated, so it is necessary to study the initiative no, it is not necessary a-a perhaps it is also necessary to

review the situation of the bureau of economic security since the competition that took place there does not meet the expectations of citizens regarding the management of this road it is necessary to coordinate efforts in order to simplify the relationship between business and the tax fiscal service of the law enforcement service within the authority of the bureau of economic security and it is really possible it was brought a good result even without the tax reform 10-10 well, finishing the topic of this reform about which you mentioned what the leader of your party said, i don't know if you are a member of the party or if you are a member of the faction, only i am definitely a member of the faction or members of the party, i can't tell you the answer for sure as to whether i am a chitanka party, the servant of the people, they did not give me any, i did not understand. how is that so? did you write an application about joining the party or not? yes, i did write an application. yes, you

were accepted at the party meeting on wednesday. i did not know that it was so mysterious . the question is whether i am his a member of the party, well, my part, the leader of the party, the servant of the people, olena shulyak, what did she say about this law, we will not be able to afford planning errors that will lead to a hole in the budget and the sagging of these entire sectors if careful calculations and a strong scientific foundation of the reform are ensured and the draft laws are written with a high quality, taking into account all the necessary changes, i have no doubt that the parliament will quickly pass a decision on the tax reform system at its meeting, but shuliak wrote on facebook that this reform should appear in the parliament as a government bill and not a bill of the deputy head of the president's office together with well- known ukrainian expert economists. well , how did this idea come about? if it is

the government, it has nothing to do with it. i observe such a trend. the ministry of finance adheres to the same fiscal policy of the ministry of economy the second is the office of the president and the prime minister and the third is the verkhovna rada headed by the chairman of our committee, so there is a certain innovation and imbalance in this policy , so i expect certain personnel decisions in order to and the national bank. what is happening now is a swan, a cancer and a pike, and it cannot be like that, in any case, the verkhovna rada should make a decision, but the ideology should still be asked of the cabinet of ministers, which actually

forms and implements the budget that we adopt in the verkhovna rada. so we we don't know who you really are forms it looks again that there are informational reasons that are beautiful and there is nothing behind it and that there are beautiful things in this initiative 10 10 for example, remove all tax benefits i think it is great, we went to the elections with this, we must continue to confess it and remove it after all this story is from our tax sector in general, so i think that there are constructive things about the sub- tax benefit, but also destructive things are to cancel the euv, at the expense of which you will be able to exist the pension fund is not known. that is, we we are now discussing equations with many of them we call on the authors of this reform to go to the committee to present their position, and then the verkhovna rada and our committee will make a decision on this issue. when you talk about swans, cancer and

pike, you are simply speaking as if you were a member of the european solidarity faction or the motherland or the voice of the opposition forces. told the economic policy and we have to solve these issues were against uh nina yuzhanina, please summarize what needs to be done right now in the financial sphere, taking into account all that we have, how much do you know ms. anna surely yehor should clarify that this draft law can be submitted even by the president, it will not be submitted by someone from the president's office because they are not the subject of a legislative initiative, this initiative can come from the president therefore, first of all, secondly, it is absolutely necessary to understand and see the text because such a phrase has just been uttered that can finish it already, er, barely raising people, raising

the economy from its knees, er, the point is, what is the elimination of all benefits, it also means the elimination of 7% vat, where there is medicine and other goods, where they where she established, which means to eliminate benefits, this is to cancel simplified taxation, which is based on four groups of shallow small businesses, this means that without the text, there was no need to start this soap bubble, because good things can turn into evil that will not be perceived , and we need to move towards such of drastic changes indeed yuzhalina olga vasylya smagliuk people's deputies of ukraine on taxing the financial policy of the chechorinda games yana valevska was with you we continue from four o'clock watch this week in the program, judicial control, a call to a friend or how circular bail works in competitions for

judicial authorities, a smart fellow, a talented specialist, how the new composition of the supreme council of justice is formed, we are clans, and they act according to the principles and a master class of the judicial character of a candidate for the supreme council of justice, how to get a lexus and an apartment as a gift congratulations, this judicial control program on ensuring the declarative and real rule of law in ukraine is the foundation for the further development of our country, in particular quality judicial reform depends on it ukraine's chance to join the eu about those who bring this entry closer for us and who, on the contrary, pushes it away let's talk today, but first, the news of the higher anti-corruption court sentenced

poltava judge serhiy kononenko to seven years in prison and confiscation of his property. he was found guilty in 2017, kononenko was also deprived of the military rank of major of justice and banned from holding positions in government bodies for a period of 3 years. to the un court its information on the case of ukraine against the russian federation, it concerns the genocide of the ukrainian people by the russian occupiers. thus, the case of ukraine against russia is already turning into the world against russia , more than 40 countries of the world have expressed their intention to support the accusation of the russian federation in the genocide of the ukrainian people, a congress of scientists and representatives of legal the university elected a new member of the supreme council of justice, he became doctor of law dmytro lukyanov, and we will talk about him in more detail.

lukyanov is the head of the department of the yaroslav the wise national university of law and known as a person who is very empathetic and always ready to support even against professionalism and integrity, for example, as a member of the competitive commission of the constitutional court, he voted for judge oleksandr sybig, who owns a lot of elite property of dubious origin, the value of which does not match official income , and whose daughter lives in moscow in 2017, the higher qualifications commission of judges recognized the election as unscrupulous, but dmytro lukyanov still supports his candidacy and recommends lukyanov to the supreme court of the constitutional court of his time recommended oleksandr petryshyn, a judge of the ksu and the president of the national academy of legal sciences, a very interesting personality in 2004. he headed the department

of theory of law of the national academy of law named after yaroslav mudry, precisely with his conclusion and his signature, the department consecrated the rules of leonid kuchma to run for a third term in the end petryshyn being a certain time the head of the organizing committee of the congress of scientists thanked lukyanov with a position in the supreme council of justice, violating a number of regulatory procedures and creating favorable conditions for his appointment we called oleksandr petryshyn and asked him what hopes he has for the election of his protégé to the supreme council of justice . i congratulate you, mr. oleksandr. my name is olena. i am a journalist of the espresso channel. we have a few questions for you. what are your expectations from the election of your protégé dmytro lukyanov first, it's just decent for a smart young man

to be talented and with his election of a smart and responsible employee, tell me why the congress was moved to poltava, but it didn't call. here is a mogilian woman and lnu, i can't tell you because how only he came out and put himself forward. i did not immediately take such a part in the work of the congress, no matter what , but the mutual assistance of petryshyn and lukyanov shows us how the circular guarantee actually works , the expert of the anti-corruption center halyna chyzhik and several influential groups told our journalists judges, which we call judicial clans and they act according to the principle of the mafia, that is, there are several people who actually control your judicial corps, unfortunately, when just judicial clans get together, agree on names and those who

will become future members of the vrp and vkks and then have their own people. there they control the entire judicial system because, er, in this way you can influence any judge, having your own members in the supreme council of justice, think about it. only a person who supported unscrupulous judges and recommended them to positions without seeing this as a problem, now she has received a seat in the highest body responsible for the professionalism of the entire judicial corps in ukraine. at the same time, the most problematic high council of justice is a collegial body of state power and judicial governance that is responsible for the integrity and transparency of the entire judicial body, the

independence and professionalism of judges and prosecutors. two are the congress of lawyers, two are delegated by the all-ukrainian conference of prosecutors and two more are elected by the congress of scientists and representatives of law schools, the chairman of the supreme court is a member of on the eve of the full-scale invasion of russia, the ethics council has started the first stage of resetting the supreme council of justice, evaluating the members of the council for good conduct, the selection is still ongoing. of legal sciences, mykola moroza, experts claim that such a choice inspires optimism. he is a well-known fighter for a

fair and honest court in ukraine. he has been the last eight years, he worked tirelessly to clean the judicial system of judges who made free decisions during the events of the revolution of dignity. he was able to secure the release of about 60 such judges, the fact that the verkhovna rada elected roman maselko to the supreme council of justice - this is another a very powerful signal, both in the judicial mafia and in this society, that the system is changing, that as it was before, it will not be, meanwhile, the ethical council continues to conduct interviews with other candidates for the position of a member of the supreme council justice last week we spoke with four more applicants. we never cease to be amazed at the desperation of some of them. on august 17, the interview was held by the head of the kharkiv appeals administrative court, hennadiy borshov. in 2017, he already tried to become a judge

of the supreme court, and the higher qualification commission of judges found him dishonest why then, in particular, questions arose regarding the judge's opaque fortune and property of dubious origin, for example , bershoff claimed that a land cruiser worth over a million hryvnias, which he supposedly uses belongs to his mother, who did not have any official income, or even a driver's license, but according to birshov, she worked for 30 years in a harmful industry to afford an expensive car and, according to the declaration, to give her beloved son uah 850,000 in cash, real estate, according to borshov, the family was provided for by the wife, at first she bought an apartment in the center of kharkiv, then an apartment in yalta. the public integrity council emphasizes

that the value of the property indicated in the declaration is understated by at least a third of the market value, which can to testify about intentional manipulations, he has been living in a house for several years, which he does not put into operation, does not officially register it and indicates it only as an unfinished construction in the declarations , starting from 2016, he had an apartment in yalta with an area of ​​52 m², which was purchased in october 2013 he points out that it cost uah 149,000, this is a ridiculous price, not even for yalta, for yalta. moreover , an apartment of such an area in the resort town of gurzuf, and uh, during the interview, he gave such a very funny explanation about the fact that they agreed with the buyer and the seller for such a price, the wife's business, which allowed the purchase of expensive

real estate, is very secret, because even gennadiy borshov himself did not know what she was doing in 2017, we called the candidate for membership in the supreme council of justice to ask if he had already remembered who his wife works for mr. gennadiy's channel, welcome , the judicial control program on the espresso tv channel, we have a few questions for you. how was your interview as a candidate for the vrp, were you asked about your wife's business, but you remembered how your wife is engaged in business, you know, i really want our journalism to be simpler. well, i will say this when i was talking to journalists, but the question and therefore i cannot comment. thank

you very much. and he did not become one, but as we can see, the judge is persistent and does not give up hope of becoming a member of the supreme council of justice. gennadiy bershav hopes for collective amnesia, the decision of the ethics council regarding him is currently unknown, but we we will keep an eye on them and will definitely tell you about his fate. this was a judicial control program. if you want to report corrupt or unscrupulous judges or illegal decisions, write to me on facebook or to this e-mail address. see you in exactly a week. shelling of the chaplyne station in the dnipropetrovsk region,

two children were among the dead, called the attack an atrocity. zelenskyi at a meeting of the un security council