and we see you too, look mr. volodymyr, well, these are the last events, when the azerbaijani troops actually occupied the lachinsky or lachinsky, i don’t know, corridor that belonged to armenia. well, it never belonged to armenia, but formally it was under the control of armenia, yes, thank you, that’s exactly what what did you ask or demand from erdogan putin that you will close your eyes mr. putin and then i will introduce troops there and you, who always supported and guaranteed the safety of armenians, will turn away, go out to pee somewhere and then suddenly come back and here once and for all our azerbaijani friends are already standing in this volochy corridor. i will simply say for the citizens that this is a connection between nagorno-karabakh and the mainland itself, well, if it were , mother armenia, and this is the moment when they

could travel here and there, communicate, carry some goods, maybe food, some water, and so on and so forth now this halychyna corridor is gone, there are some neighboring ones, but my question is about the role of erdogan. do i understand this role correctly? the war for karabakh, actually, as far as the settlements are concerned and the two forces. this is for azerbaijan. is it important that the forgotten jesus can congratulate them on the fact that de facto they came under the control of azerbaijan well, but the truth is a little bit. i want to understand such euphoria because the situation is definitely the armed forces of ukraine are moderating the situation around karabakh against the russian federation in favor of azerbaijan, that's what

we have now is that azerbaijan has accelerated the implementation of one of the points of the agreement as a result of the 44-day war, november by the 20th year, i.e. automatically when this road that passes through the specified three settlements passes under the control of azerbaijan, and these settlements without armenians must be said here, it is important that it passes to azerbaijan, that is, in relation to the policy of the peaceful settlement of karabakh, it is fundamentally important for azerbaijan that armenians from these settlements points left why because these are the settlers after 1992 after the occupation in the houses of azerbaijani colleagues new buildings and not only but these are not native residents of the relachin of non-native residents of karabakh in the broadest sense of the word, these are immigrants from lebanon, syria, so it happened as it did, it happened relatively painlessly, that is, most of the

houses remained, there were no such arsons as in the 20th year in the kilibajar district, for example, in vagan district. i want to remind you that according to the results of the fighting, three districts of azerbaijan damskyi and bachynskyi, they practically left without fighting, respectively, well, in fact, the capitulation of the faith and the tripartite agreement that i indicated is what, let's say , is exceptionally positive for azerbaijan and, in principle, positive in relation to the deoccupation of the territory but the other road is an alternative. it leaves the connection between armenia and karabakh. i am talking now about the territory that is de facto under the russian military protectorate in my coordinate system and is still under occupation, so the fundamental situation here has not changed. in this regard, the only thing that is in question is on the perspective of a series of commanding heights that azerbaijan receives with these

settlements and also as a result of, let's say, controlled or correlated e-e battles with the russians in the period of the first third of august this year therefore, the situation is developing prospectively in favor of azerbaijan, but let's say that azerbaijan definitely cut off something, cut off this enclave in fact. this is not true yet. there are difficult negotiations in the triangle between azerbaijan, turkey and the russian federation, which, even while sagging on the ukrainian front, is present and moderates the conflict on of the land, it must be recognized and the problem is that there is revan, physically now he is not a subject in these processes , that is, around karabakh, and this is a problem not only for hyalen. because the russian federation so far manages to kill or shoot down any prospect of a bilateral normal peace settlement

between azerbaijan and armenia, without which there will be no peace in the region well, but if we have already immersed ourselves so professionally in this sphere, a meeting should take place one of these days. as i understand it, between by the leaders of azerbaijan and armenia in bypassing moscow and without moscow and they can agree among themselves whether it is even possible to agree when the armenians are completely dissatisfied with the results of this 44-day war azerbaijanis love their leader vilham aliyev and are quite satisfied. well, in between - this is such an intermediate part of satisfaction, they want to take everything for themselves as it was before 1992, that is, it is possible to throw moscow out of all negotiations and it is possible to reach an agreement between azerbaijan and the armenians in principle, in principle, it is possible now i am

skeptical about the meeting that is supposed to take place at the level of the leaders of the two countries, you know when this next line of meetings is launched, the question always arises where and with whom the meeting is the last one now according to the latest information first on august 30 the representatives of azerbaijan and armenia are supposed to meet in moscow and on the 31st with charles michel aliyev and the kitten it is in my opinion now at this moment it can change but it is a very revealing moment that this is a very low victory will be fixed in brussels, and de facto in a bilateral format, because everyone except moscow can make such a format, either in tbilisi or in brussels, when sit them at the table, pour tea or behind them, or close the door in front of them, even i see such a trend as positive. i will repeat that the problem is that armenia, being a political vassal of any kind, now depends

on moscow. armenia's subjectivity is not like that - in my opinion, this is a problem, although armenia is now following the events of the war of ukraine against russia after its dynamics after february 22, and they understand that its suzerain is sagging and will someday it will sag and they are trying to somehow prepare for it, but in relation to this, look at a very important question, i’m afraid. what is the latest on social media? i am interested in this. i am not convinced that many people in ukraine are interested in this, but the role of turkey is of interest. i think most ukrainians are more interested than armenians . in this design, in this design, it is getting stronger, its influence in the caucasus is getting stronger. the president of

turkey dreams of creating some kind of new empire. friends and here are friends and here are friends and our enemy is russia, by the way, i can definitely imagine that they have an ottoman or pan turanian idea . these axioms are getting stronger at the moment, the only thing now is erdoğan, who lives in his pre-election logic, who has to be re-elected next summer. well, he wants this very much, he is not interested in large-scale escalations, to whom does such a paradox go around karabakh? turkey, if its ek export is exported to azerbaijan, it is decisive for this because it is a banal fuse against the russian federation, it is an allied relationship that turkey

will not provide to anyone else, nor to ukraine, nor to anyone, therefore, in this regard, the position of azerbaijan is powerful in the sense that if there is a large-scale escalation , turkey will stand up for azerbaijan, even unwillingly at the highest political level, all these schemes and algorithms have been worked out, we will watch it and here i will repeat karabakh now strategically moderates the armed forces of ukraine and there are no paradoxes here, one more question very briefly , am i right or wrong, but if the influence of turkey is increasing, does this mean that the influence of russia in the caucasus is weakening, of course, but the problem with russia is that it does not think so, it is trying to play turkey to replace, let's say, the russian-turkish tandem of the settlement of the south caucasus, karabakh, in particular, well, let's say, by displacing other regional players such as

iran and large-scale players such as the european union, france or the united states, but we understand that azerbaijan knows how to wait, turkey is a follower of byzantium or byzantium, it knows how to wait . everyone understands that moscow is hanging not only in the southern caucasus and in cross regions, that is why they are waiting and preparing, carefully watching the ukrainian the front here, the caucasus is not unique here, the whole of it, give for such definitions on the rates, watch it very carefully with binoculars, your last words, i think many ukrainians will like volodymyr kopchak, the head of the caucasian branch of the center study of the army of conversion and disarmament was in touch with us. thank you to mr. volodymyr premik. well , he satisfied my curiosity, but the rest

i don't know. now you have to satisfy someone. for example, today we very often start administratively. thank you to the audience for waking up . on this saturday evening and wrote us a lot of interesting questions so that we but sooner , around september, when we will answer all this, we will start an interactive, but you can write and comment on our evaluation page on facebook espresso.tv or in the youtube chat so, dear mr. mykola, half a year of war, in your opinion, ukraine has already covered half of the way to victory over orkostan , have you not reached it yet? i want to be right here and i have to restrain myself, and when half of ukraine

is being pushed around by zuluz and zelenskyi or zelenskyi, let's counteroffensive in the kherson region, let's do it, let's all want it, but you understand very well. if we don't make mistakes, we'll win the chickens, as they say in russian the federation counts in the fall. i just don’t know if it will be the fall of 22nd year, count in the fall of 22nd or 23rd year, but i just want to say that i have the impression that the military is higher than the military-political or political military leadership of ukraine with gritted teeth. believe me, they are too they want a counter-offensive, i don't believe you. yes, they sit and think. no. we will stand as we are . they also want it, but they definitely know something more than i do. unfortunately, there is no interactive system. if there was , you could have asked a question. they answered. that's why they know something that doesn't allow them to

do it, i mean the counteroffensive and i think they definitely know more than me and all of us and that's why they sit quietly and say let's take our time, let's do something more reliably because it's very important this is reliability a counter-offensive is not just a counter -offensive. and this is a counter-offensive that will not end, which will continue until the kerch bridge, then this is a counter- offensive. and if this is a counter-offensive, kherson was captured . i don't like the counter-offensive, i like those finalists, it's desirable, of course, the urals, the ural mountains, i would define for myself as such an important one, yes , an intermediate one, in principle, vladivostok, we will already have a

ukrainian, japanese friendship there, everything will be fine , but as a more or less sober person i still think that, well, the urals will be fine too, but i don't, i don't want to. i think it's just the russian narrative from which they started quickly, immediately here five five directions to kyiv to kherson to kharkiv all odesa landing all a i think that ukrainians are the opposite have a completely opposite version of behavior on the battlefield, and this version, as far as i understand, is simply designed to make the russian army incapacitated, nervousness, cowardice, throwing weapons, throwing positions, broken headquarters, diluted or

kits, and so on, yes, it is not visible, it is not it is clear that they ran there like that. i don’t know chipayev. it’s napoleon, but maybe it will give a faster effect and this effect will be immediate and final . i would like it, but it is clear. by the way, it is mobilized from the occupied areas of donetsk and luhansk regions which, in relation to the full-scale invasion, were occupied by the so-called pseudo-republics of the dpr and lpr , they are also mobilizing in the markets and from the shops, and all the men are simply being forcibly taken away. and now they have already begun to surrender because they were held there by some donetsk bloggers, who i became defeated by the armed forces ukraine, i don't remember his last name, but he turned to these mobilized people, they say, don't

be cannon fodder, it's better to surrender yourself as a prisoner, they will provide you with security accordingly, and you won't even fight on the side of ukraine, you'll just to live a peaceful life, and there are already such precedents. therefore, these are good positive words for us, one of the ideas of the ukrainian military and military-political command, and i began to feel this back in may, that one of the ideas is that somewhere the front should open somewhere, some area, so that there is not just someone refused to go on the attack, and it doesn't have to be 100 km wide there, but just in some part of it, literally 5-3 km. this already changes the concept, it changes everything on the front. i think that this is one of the ideas of the general staff of ukraine, but i i don't suggest not great as a specialist, much, much worse than being hired, that's why i was thinking so simply

, yes, let's go to the museum. yes, mr. mykolay, do you believe in the revolutionary people's army that operates in russia, or is it a fake? i know very well who told us all about this army. i think there is such a page on the internet, but i was writing there, you know. i want to say this, i will say this. i would like to believe it, because this is the only way, because let the russians get a little clean of what they have done, when it is not la-la-la how everything is progressive the liberal intelligentsia of russia, and when someone starts to risk and for life choose some kind of parole in russia, then they know there was such a fondreskov.

and when there was an attempt on hitler and it became clear because there was a canary from counterintelligence well, i will not go into depth, and it became clear that they were watching by those who are preparing an assassination attempt, well, that is, they are unknown, and then the question arose listen, come on, let's not risk it, why are we going to kill hitler just as simply, i don't know who they will catch and that's all, and then one of those ideologues of the fondresks, he said, you know, the time will come when germany will be cursed in the world and we must give the future generations of germans something to cling to, saying that there were also hitler's enemies, not only friends, not only those who supported us, and we have to even die so that it happens later, but we have to do it at the risk of life so that future generations would have something

to rely on for their completely unjust war against this humanity, then when i was listening to ponomarev and i love it, i was thinking about this, that this is just such an analogy with the year 44. well, they started earlier to prepare and if they do it, the scattered will definitely be washed away. i'm not saying that anyone will forgive them, but there 3 cm on russia's body somewhere here or there will somehow be cleaner than the whole of russia, which now looks very bad like well, my eyes tell me very bad and all these talks about the fact that it is not possible to ban russians from traveling to europe , it is possible to ban russia on the spot and maybe it is necessary so and so on and the like, that is, there are many here, but they are the only ones who can save russians russia - they are

russians if they have enough forces to throw out putin to kill some generals there, i don't know, to start a guerrilla war, to help ukraine in this way, not in this way. i am against war strongly. you helped us, of course. and they have to do this work too, and then something may change, the insertion to them a-a, in addition to this question, there is another one from another viewer, the last hope putler is a traitor or what other trump cards does he have, i do not believe in keeping any face because he will feed the tame anything." i

i think that putin is doomed, how will it be? i can't say. i'm not a great specialist in predicting the future. i can say that the russian tradition is the closest friends. i was just analyzing today , starting with the tsar, emperor paul i, who was actually killed by his son, alexander, and then who succeeded to the throne. and until recent times when someone says we don't know who will take over in the event of a coup in the event we know for sure we don't know who exactly but the fact that it will be closer closer always coups happened with people who stood next to the monarch with next to the general secretary well, there is brezhnev khrushchev brezhnev khrushchev's right-hand man that's why when it is unknown, it is still unknown, stalin was killed, poisoned or not,

who took power next to him, who stood next to him, it always happens like that, everyone, everyone in russia, everyone in russia, coups, that's where palin played in 701, he is one of the organizers are also the right hand of the night, the left, or perhaps the left foot of paul the first, but these are the people of the first circle, well, exactly, there are people near putin who want to see, now there are people near putin who do not want power, they want to save their fortunes when they stole for tens of years, maybe they killed someone, maybe they destroyed somewhere, they finally became billionaires, and then putin comes and says that now everything is yours, it 's not even mine, it's unknown, and whose grandmothers in switzerland and america are no longer your grandmothers. yes, you

already have this big boat there is no and this plane is not there and that is not there or there will be no problem tomorrow and not so that this no, with constant work, as in some soviet movie, accumulates this fortune for himself, so that later one beautiful or terrible moment comes putin said that you have nothing and all this you did, killed, stole, squeezed, and so on. well, here you have such an idea , and you no longer have money, so i think that this is a close, close circle, it's a matter of time, too, how will it start to press and it hasn't started yet pressure in the beautiful month of september begins, this is when the pressure will begin, everyone, only for september, everyone. yes, we have two questions on one very interesting topic, so i will ask two at once. why did the authorities allow

a crowd of several thousand believers of the ukrainian orthodox church of the moscow patriarchate freely passed the procession from kamianets-podilskyi to pochaev during the ban on mass gatherings and the next question why were there stout men with shoulder pads in that march to pochaev if it was sabotage they came such a distance and no one stopped them well we didn't we know who is there with the shoulder pads, maybe they were agents of the sbu or the ministry of internal affairs or ukrainian intelligence, we don't know during the moscow patriarchate well, how, how? their work, secondly, it is called democracy if we lose democracy during the war, and democracy means that in ukraine today there are and tomorrow there will be questions in proportions, but in our

state of war, it does not provide for uh, three times, you are somewhere there, you are not in the head of a person get into this head and you don't know what's going on in this head , and betrayals can happen in this head and so on and so on and so on. the heads of people who are leaving, they are leaving, they decided to get together and go somewhere from point a to point b let's them let's shoot them for are we going to put everyone in prison for this, we still lacked an internal front, we still have few russians open to us, let's get into a fight inside , they don't interfere with anyone, someone likes it, i understand that the majority doesn't like it, but well, it's called democracy, but if in the fight against the russians, we let's start cutting off the democrats, then putin won, then

we have a non-democratic state, and in a democratic state, unfortunately or fortunately, it is possible , and it is possible, and this is democracy, you can't forbid people to say something, but we don't we know what you said there. by the way, we know that a certain number of people from point a go to point b, and does anyone know what slogans there were, what words were spoken, no complaint yet about the fact that they were allowed to just leave. even now, no one is gathering so en masse. it is an interesting question. and who should give permission to whom? well, the leadership, the leadership of what, or the city. i don’t know the legal details . you need to ask for permission. now, not all ukrainians can just go to some meetings and protests because martial law stipulates that the law.

if the people left, well, let's go back again, shoot, there's no flight, why is there still a police force that can arrest and issue a fine for violating the laws of ukraine, and yet the democratic state decided not to use the police, but to give people the opportunity to express what they want to express. by the way, it's really interesting i will ask today after the program what slogans were there , suddenly there were such slogans of the moscow patriarchate, we are for ukraine and against russia, what will we do next? commander-in-chief it seems that it was already after that , if i am not mistaken, and hmm, there was this one, if the editor reminds me, as the head of the moscow patriarchate, onufriy, yes, yes, anusy, well , democracy in the country is what we are fighting for, our soldiers are dying because we are fighting for democracy against the

totalitarian in the russian sense, it can be during the war that a person has the right to express himself, to express himself for cyril, to be glorified, neither to glorify, no one glorified there, but any person has the right to speak, pray, any person in ukraine has the right to speak, as far as i remember the constitution of ukraine, no one but to read prayers and calls for the russians to come and kill ukrainians, no if you haven't heard i have many precedents when one well, after the broadcast, i will show you a lot of news where even priests were arrested before so when it says what it says, what are they arresting, apparently, they didn't say what they say what you, what do you suspect them of, so we arrested them, there is a service,

everything should have been the other way around, the truth is that young european angelica should say, let's go democracy, go sbu, what this kind of thing always has limits, any democracy has limits and all of us have an old man to say oh no, let's order the superiors, we ask if it is possible or not , and it turns out who is young, they attack territorial integrity and sovereignty, they want to destroy our nation and call for this in their prayers it's not about democracy. it's about democracy. it 's about democracy. if there is freedom of speech, it 's about democracy. if there is no sound, there will be a word - it's not about democracy. i know that no one will like my words, but i am always very suspicious. i believe when there is freedom there will be when there are hints to ban freedom of speech even if i don't

like them i am not loyal to the russian patriarchy i have never even been loyal to the russian patriarchy but that's how they came out let 's be first always against democracy very thin such a fight let's it's forbidden here it 's forbidden here it's forbidden here we'll have to do it and then we'll wake up at one o'clock in the morning and we'll say damn it and that's all and what i want not to be forbidden one thing is forbidden we had an interesting discussion about the framework of democracy i think that there is no democracy or fascism or democracy, and everything else is an opinion on this matter, but everyone has the right to their work in the absence of democracy, i will fight for it. and how will we still fight for what is in a democracy