get rid of everyone who disagrees with them. are you with them agents of the ukrainian special services? well, why don't you want to be an employee with us because you already cooperate with the sbu? and here you are laughing, and they have it like that, well, a very intelligent person will not morally go there to study and work do you understand, this is a special composition of the head. it is absolutely logical. it seems to me that in your opinion in general, is it possible to somehow force russia to go to the zatom station because, well, maybe it will be able to achieve this. who knows, we have been waiting so long for them to come to this station, radbeson too to what extent can he force russia to leave the nuclear power plant, he ca n't do anything about it, the nuclear power plant is such a simple situation that they stay there because they believe that even if the ukrainian troops manage to successfully counterattack there to liberate melitopol or from

other places in zaporizhzhia, that is, all ukrainians will not go to the energy donation precisely because they are afraid of a nuclear accident and disconnection of the hares, because they will hold on to it precisely for this reason, not because they want to disconnect themselves from the energy system of ukraine although this is an obvious fact, and therefore it is also necessary to realize that they may want to use their presence at the station as an argument to stay in this territory. such a golden action in their opinion because, well, how to conduct battles on the territory of the npp is dangerous and they are not there and they are already there, if they see that they cannot stay there or they are in the cauldron, then they will leave. and if they understand that they can maintain their position, then they will still maintain energodar, unfortunately,

it is such a rear for them, of course, and chernobyl there was, i apologize, it was a non-working station, let's talk more about what is happening abroad on the eastern side, uh, quite interesting info ghosts appeared there for discussion, for example, the arrest of one of the opposition members groysman , he was probably open from the very beginning stated that he does not support the russian war in ukraine, but he was first fined there, and then sent to court, the court recognized e that uh, well, the court forbade him to visit public places and use the internet with the word uh-uh that's enough it's a strange story, it's strange to observe it from the side of ukraine, and in your opinion why then, if the russians

saw evgeny, or this roizman, objectionable like that, why didn't they take him to prison earlier, somehow the process is such a rink, he walks the wheel, the size is no longer simple and marginal oh, positioner he is a former america is a big city in this place. he enjoys huge support, he has authority, and not in liben, only in liberal circles. industry and why he carried out measures that, to put it mildly , do not fit into the norms of civilized behavior, but many russians like such actions that he used, the size is an ambiguous figure, that's why they waited there, you know. i think that such people as exchange, they do not really understand the psychology of their own society.

i am used to being an opponent of the government and having a certain security because i have always had a lot of social support, but the issue of war is a completely different issue for russian society. do not accept the government criticize putin talk about the corruption of officials talk about the fact that they do not like the raising of the retirement age, but when it comes to the war of aggression they are always on the side of the government i would even say otherwise the government is always on the side of the people, but we very often say that russians propagandoni television and what they say and say television and i claim that this television speaks with the voice of the russian people i told i think yesterday mykolaiv decided to

tell you that i watched the film andrii loshaka on the foal on the rain tv channel, in which he talks about the breakdown of ties between people who support the news, it is supported by russians, russians, and ukrainians, by russians who already live in europe, and there is an interesting thing that all the supporters of the war say the same thing as the nightingale kiselyov and their relatives say they they will repeat television, but what is interesting is that these people do not support putin at the same time, most of them do not speak in the voice of television when it comes to social and political problems, they speak in their own voice if you believe you believe in propaganda, rightly so, if you don't believe 70% of propaganda, but the 30th verse means that it is not propaganda . and for various reasons, one is that he is not

pluralistic, the other is that he raised the retirement age, and another is that there is no gasification of cities, and it must be said that putin has suffered a fiasco, but these 30% of what is left, the war with ukraine, oddly enough, compensate for all these troubles are like crimea the crimean rating, which has grown above the yeast, means that as long as putin is at war with ukraine, he may not doubt the support of the russian people, and roizman may not doubt that even if the people who support him will agree to his arrest and imprisonment. and this is just such a reality according to which we have to count. the russian empire became the way it became historical precisely because the russian people believe that a war of aggression is the normal state of the state and that for its sake you can tolerate it, you can live badly, you can lose your children.

do you remember that these parents of prisoners of war with whom he was and whether they were killed, with whom our soldiers or journalists talk on the phone, they say how he gave his life for the homeland and we tell them this, the tv said no, it is not the tv when a person's child dies she doesn't think about tv. she thinks about her beliefs. this and all of this is not something that was hammered into people's heads. this is something that worked by itself. with those who hated stalin, there were a lot of them, it was the civil war before and many people were simply intimidated and they would be very happy if a million people joined the army of general vlasov, it is not a joke to separate them. what was the level of hatred for the bolsheviks if a million people voluntarily decided that they can serve the germans when they were captured, these are serious numbers, but

the majority understood, you believed that it was necessary to protect russia. but the most important thing is that they considered it absolutely legitimate what they captured after that another territory that this was never questioned in the soviet union that people even with absolutely democratic views could not understand that the soviet army did not liberate poland or czechoslovakia-hungary and other countries and the baltic countries that it occupied them like hitler that at the time when the soviet troops if you want to cross over even through the dnipro, even this was already an unliberated struggle of the russian people, the occupation and the replacement of one cruel occupation by another cruel occupation. that the russians were not at home in riga, tallinn in

kyiv in warsaw and that they were supposed to leave there, but they didn't, they stayed there until 1991, and the most important thing is that, as we can see, after the war here, they want to return again. they still haven't realized that they were just as vile and cruel invaders like hitler because if a state wants to liberate its territory from the enemy and then take the territory seized by the enemy as a tribute and use its resources and use its people to rob and kill and considers it a disaster when this territory decided to become free, this applies to us and the poles, you czechs , the baltics, then this is an invading state. that's all, and talk to any russian, even one who has democratic views, you will see that he does not understand this at all, you will be talking to an alien, believe me. well, ukraine has never encroached on

russian territory, and we talk about territories that are essentially ethnic, we talk about the first such border - this is the status quo until february 24, friend - this is the liberation of all of ukraine. instead, let's imagine a hypothetical situation that we have reached e-e status quo on february 24, this situation, i know you that it is just this pure story that is only in the head of our president because he became the president on the status code of february 24 because in order for there to be a situation of e-e lines on february 24, they had this is the line there must be somewhere in vladimir's head a way to get to him, but there is no such league in vladimir putin's volovinchyna, i can name them in principle the first line is the line of the administrative borders of the donetsk luhansk oblasts the second line is the line of the administrative borders of the kherson oblast of the zaporizhzhia region, the third line is the line

of administrative borders in kherson , kharkiv, mykolaiv, and odesa regions. this third line was the fourth line - this is the line of the administrative borders of the so-called novorossiya, to fully understand it, you need to refer to vladimir putin's crimea speech of 2014, where he says about the russian regions, it was presented together with odesa, it is the south, the exit to transnistria is what they already said once again , donetsk-luhansk first line, kherson, zaporizhia, second line, kharkiv, mykolayiv odesa's third line is the fourth line of novorossiya, essentially to the dnipro, and the fifth line is the line of all of central ukraine to lviv, ternopil , ivano-frankivsk regions, this is the 5th line, and the sixth

line is all of ukraine. there are 6 lines for you, they are absolutely clear, so this is the aggressor line let's look at our line, if we reach the line on february 24, then we either liberate the entire luhansk and donetsk regions or they launch a counterattack. well, how is it, or they arrive, we take back the border , control over our state border, or we we are looking at some demarcation line with which they will again say that they want to restore territorial integrity, but what has changed in the dnr then , so i believe that there may be a hypothetical situation if we cannot, say, liberate one of the ukrainian regions and they stop at its administrative border if we are if it is possible , for example, to liberate kherson oblast and we consider the option of already attacking crimea, for example, it will be

such a beacon for putin that he cannot hold the government and his rating will fall. no, this there will be no fall of the radish, it will be the end of the regime, and i did not tell you until the end, the russian government is always maintained at the expense of wars of aggression, but always falls when it loses mysterious wars, since 1904, russian students there are freedom-loving, all such enemies of the regime, socialists, socialists, and quits ran to the winter palace and knelt there and sang god the king reigns over us treaty because nicholas ii attacked japan let's show them with a yellow macaque all of russia was all and then it was all when the russian fleet

died, the students made a congratulatory telegram to the japanese military and went out to the winter palace with shouts to leave and everything was bad that they thought about nicholas the second a month before the war, they told him during all these exits that all of russia rose up for days and they did not overthrow him, of course, but this there was the first russian revolution first, and the second was when russia began to suffer the defeat of the first world war, there is nothing terrible. by the way , this did not happen with russia when there was a february revolution and it was in st. petersburg - they brought bread bread they were simply incredibly annoyed that for three years father tsar has not been able to annex the beautiful territory that is being lost as a territory, but when the troops of general brusylov were here in lviv, when the ukrainian language was banned here, when

the metropolitan of the ukrainian greek-catholic church, andriy sheptytsky, was expelled from here into exile, i this well, first of all, it was very good and father was wonderful, may god give us 100 years to live with such father, but as soon as the troops began to retreat seriously , immediately all moods changed. so, if putin will lose crimea, russia will lose putin and all these people who are now on russian television telling you that you must love the president will tell you such things about putin, they will show you photos of their children who hated putin all their lives and died for unknown reasons, they will talk about their social distrust and there won't be a single person in russia who despised putin. dmitri medvedev will tell with tears in his eyes on tv that putin beat him in his own office, but he wanted russia's freedom so much that he endured it even now

endured everything and all of them and none of them will say that they threw him out because he lost in the crimea. there is no other reason for putin, he is in a difficult situation from the point of view of obtaining his power. he has to wage a war, but he cannot immediately to afford luxury is not just to lose it like that. what the russians will put it, he could say that we have achieved our goals if we are conditional conditional, so let's say we captured the entire donetsk and luhansk regions, now there is an independent state, we accept them into russia, cheers hooray for that the first line, which says that we are on the lines, there is a second line, they cannot take over the donetsk region, they say, well, now we cannot send them into active military service, why are the ukrainian nazis, you know the bastards, they are driving the population of russian people out of here, they are taking them to camps in lviv region and khmelnytskyi region and there they are being tortured, forced to

speak this terrible language, to read the poems of the nationalist poet shevchenko oh, and we can’t , the russian military, they are like children they cry and can’t go on the attack and that’s why we are in good will we are demonstrating here, we will stop, we will simply fire at their dump sites, but we will not fight any further, we have done everything, we have demilitarized the entire military arsenal, we have destroyed them, and they will no longer go to mother russia. no, this is still possible, and the russian people will swallow it at this stage but if crimea well, it's very difficult to say after all this propaganda, you know, here we are, we thought so here, it's only extra expenses, well, if you and i now during this program, we could find a recipe for volodymyr volodymyrovych such that he

it's good to say that if he loses crimea, we can imagine that he can hold on, but it's very difficult because he was there and now he's gone, and they focused all their propaganda on this crimea, and the most important thing is not to promote, but to be sincere the faith of the russian people, which existed until the 14th year and until the 91st year, that our crimea and donbass are not the same situation, let's say the loss of the donbass or if belarus suddenly wants to become a member of nato, these are not at all these emotions when ukraine joins nato. well, that is, approximately at the level no russian people there is no sentiment for belarus here, contact us why don't they subjugate belarus for so long, the magazines are in their hands, they really hold lukashenka for famous places, they can do it, but for the average russian, belarus is like a

light bulb, that is, they are nothing. if putin lukashenka , i will sign this year that it is a single state well, they signed it and it’s good. well, it’s okay, but crimea has a different effect on the brain. there are some things that russians consider their own and important to themselves. russians themselves are ordinary russians. this is crimea. it’s a fact, it’s ukraine in itself, not donbas. the donbas are interesting for the last time well, yes, in ukraine there is donbas, there is no donbas well, you know that, who in russia is interested, is there an amur region or, uh, perm region or not well, there is and there is well, we should have regions here in russia too, that is ukraine - this is important. it affects the emotional range. this is the logic of chauvinism. ukraine had enough of every russian officer. he always dreamed that he could stay

in ukraine before retirement, somewhere in the poltava region . because everyone was afraid that if the soviet union remained, it would be transferred from ukraine to vladivostok or, god forbid, to magadan and there the service would end. what kind of work, lord, what a horror. and here, kharkiv, poltava , it’s warm, there’s something to eat. what do you think about the work, there was something to eat? well, here’s the whole story. so, everything is clear here,

just in this context, we have, well, in the context of russia, in our conversation today. to talk about the theater that was arranged by the propagandists this week with the bombing of the car of the propagandist dugin, his daughter dugin was killed there, i will tell our viewers more, this is putin's ideologue, he is called that although i think that in fact he has nothing to do with putin, that they met maybe once in their life and when i was once told that putin accepts the ideas of the arc on odugin, there are no ideas, you are like that and any person who drinks beer would not know. er knitting dugin simply says what he says among non-

statistic russian ordinary people. putin is an average russian in order to know the views of dugin. it is absolutely not interesting to read dugin or putin to know about gent. i would not exaggerate . pay attention to dugin himself here, interesting, interesting, something else, what did the former deputy of the state think, ponomaryev said that he was responsible for this, what do they call it, a terrorist attack or for the murder of his daughter? itself, the so-called national republican army , ah, this is such an insurgent movement. do you think that there really is such a movement in russia and, er, could it be such an organized opposition there? would continue to be spirits, all the existence of which people found out when it was undermined. and

the penultimate thing he did, because it would undermine the arch itself, because the influence of others on social and political life in the russian federation is equal to the number zero, so i have not yet seen any confirmation of ponomaryev's words. maybe he thinks that in this way he is raising some shares in his own. very often there is a situation when people take responsibility for some things. by the way, ponomaryev did not say that he was involved in this. he said that he was just some people. they sent some manifesto which he read that he simply read the manifesto even of people who by default are political you know there was an irish republican army there was also a political wing the shanfei party of northern ireland some leaders read their manifesto, but everyone understood that the representatives of the irish republican party, at least the army, at least share the views of the leaders of the shinfi party, it is not known how they communicate. well, it is clear what happened. what is communicated so that the fighting organizations always communicate with the political party, but it

was a single question, one way or another, in the eyes of the people of ponomariov - this we are not the only value of this organization . this is the russian special services to create an atmosphere of hatred in russia, it may be so but again, they didn't kill the anchors well, what is it like for the average russian on the arc, it's not alla pugacheva, i'm sorry , there's some little-known character, don't take it dishonest, who's running around wasted he speaks banalities with his eyes, a graphomaniac in essence well, he was famous when he was more famous when he was the husband of the main lesbian of the russian federation, ms. debryanska , there was such a time. self-fascist e-e extremist both for and for family

values ​​and why is vodozanska who was the leader of the libohorian party legally illegally demonstratively i mean they declared their e-e their readiness for intimate relations with other women in the 90s this is not 2022 and in russia, in which, uh, most politicians are busy passing and writing laws to fight against gay propaganda or something else. i think that all these people are just ordinary people who are adjusting to the fact that his ex-wife and all these other people who they are surrounded by agents of the special services of dugentsin, the general of the main intelligence department of the general staff, and a very stupid son, he does not even have an education, he studied at some militia technical school and did not finish it, well, that is,

these people could simply get confused in some of their financial relationships. russia is such a country in what kind of person can go outside the store filling a stall for some wrongly spent amount from the budget for something like that there goes on 90 well, they never really ended there by a large account at the level of the elites, and this duhina herself well, yes, she is a propagandist, she grinded a little bit of these sauces , but such there legion, she could have been just an accidental victim of parental disputes, maybe she herself was the object of interest of some competitors, i don’t even think that there is a need to be distracted by that that this in itself has no meaning, what matters is how it is used in russia, not as much as i thought here, ukrainian society was quite surprised by the international reaction to it in particular, the pope of rome said that dugina is an

innocent victim of the war and, instead, we criticized him, they say he was silent when chaplyne olenivka kramatorsk, what do you think today are problems with political views and this is a question of his argentinian past and all this populism that in general, inherent in argentine politics, when you lead the church there for so long, you in fact indulge in this spirit of populism, and on the other hand, he has problems with those around him, because the question really arises, even if he wanted to condemn you and you, from which he was so frightened that he listed her among the victims of the russian-ukrainian war. here in moscow , the car of some expert propagandist

, who makes various statements on television, catches fire. they understood what she does, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, she is a political activist somewhere. it doesn't matter why. to believe that this is generally a consequence of the russian-ukrainian war, why should she live only because russian propaganda says so, that she is trying to tie criminal cases to the possible murder of a person known to few a man and a daughter who were absolutely not an influential marginal figure before the war, so someone talked to the pope so that he was not young in his mind, and for many years he needed a lot of things with france, about the trip to kazakhstan , the pope said that he could not, i thought that the person who is the first priest. where should he go to ukraine anyway? because here he has a congregation that suffers and dies and dies, and not to kazakhstan, which is

a member of the dkb - the eurasian union, and also wants to meet with the patriarch of moscow, who is a common war criminal and he and his this satanic sect that essentially supports the war, i don't know if it can be called the orthodox church . i believe that it is not a church at all, but rather a sect of eaters of life, and i even think that they actually pray for people to be killed so that they are saved, but these are my assumptions so they met, it is known that kirill himself did not go to kazakhstan that he probably someone in moscow said that he did not need to meet with the pope , and since he usually listens to those who tell him something, he wrote it somewhere in some kind of skeet and sits there and does not work out why the pope now meets with the moscow patriarch, it is good that he did not meet, but not of his own free will, why should he go to kazakhstan and not go

here well, that is, a million questions arise and this is a huge problem of this pontificate that is becoming you know, when an article is published on the website of the frankfurt himal with the title of pope putin, pope putin, it is a huge blow to the reputation of the church, which can be compared with the blow that was inflicted on the deputies-catholic church during the second world war world war ii, when the pope at that time also tried to be very careful in relation to berlin and then to the church, thanks to the great popes, on the 23rd, john paul ii managed to take it to a new level of morality. and now it's all starting to sink again, it's tragic. we have to pass on the news that the information service has already prepared for you