i want homa to be rural or to have missiles. well, we definitely mean russian missiles, but this movement of these terrorist organizations fell on israeli cities, and that is why it does not give licenses for certain types of weapons, as if, well, you know, the world is arranged in such a way that somewhere there will be some component of that or of another state for us, of course, which is absolutely so shameful, more precisely for us, and shameful for germany, but we emphasize that, for example, she did not want to supply us with those uh-e armored cars or tanks that they have, they just know how to uh-uh in the open air, she tried to use such a ring system, that is, to transfer to her allies a newer fan. well, what about you? and in the 80s, the beginning of the 90s, the weapons were transferred to us by the soviets. ukrainians know how to use all soviet

russian equipment, so there is no need to relearn. but these are such weak arguments, we showed them even in germany. because there was such interesting information, when ours were training on these german howitzers, even our guys were somewhat modified. software and they showed a high class of using this, that is, this silent opinion that the ukrainians are a little underdeveloped, they have the ability to master this modern technology, it is definitely nonsense, our guys. well, in general, in principle, we know that we are a technical nation. and the crypt, everything is fine . well, in your opinion, according to your feelings, is the flywheel starting to spin now? i do not know the defense forces of different countries that are actually starting to produce what is necessary for us and what is necessary for own states' weapons to protect themselves from potential threats, why are they asking because i

am now referring to the expert opinion of mr. beleskov, he noted that the big problem is actually the same demilitarization of many european countries at least after the second world war . that is how they experienced this trauma, in fact, nevertheless, now it is has a chance to change, because, well, the vision is changing, and in general, the threats on the continent of the defense of european countries, in the same, in the same, i don’t know, in any of the overseas countries, have already started to get a little on the rails for that in order to restore what was actually gradually fading away. during the second half of the 20th century, this process is definitely taking place, but we understand that it is quite slow and really, well, first of all, it should be said not after the second world war, but in the year 91

, and there is such a saying as peaceful this is actually a dividend when the soviet union collapsed. there was no longer such an ideological confrontation, so russia still had nuclear power, so it threatened and now threatens the world with an actual catastrophe, but at least in the 90s it was a beggar country what was the joy of uh, nozhkombusha, and of course they didn't threaten anyone there in particular. that's exactly why the europeans relaxed, the end of history seemed to come there, uh, liberal democracy won. well, all over the world, at least on the european continent , and of course there were certain interesting processes and they are positive in principle - this is the union of the defense and industrial complexes of different countries and what, if we say so, is the general european industry that was created and well, in principle, it is logical not to repeat and not to do the same thing that they are doing others have the same thing, for example eurofighter, there are

a large number of businesses from different countries and participates, so the process of restoring these industrial capacities is really underway. germany itself decided to spend 100 billion euros to strengthen itself specificist germany, which is actually not combat-capable by and large, a powerful european army, but this money has been allocated so far, there are plans, at least final plans regarding, for example, those things that they are going to buy, that is, there are simply so far what is the reasoning and the final plans have not been approved yet? well, it is clear that there is, it is necessary to see whether there are certain competencies left or whether there is a sufficient number of components, since, for example, now there is a problem with the same microchips in the world, not only in russia, which actually got to the good old us of export control

in relation to it. but europeans also have problems with this, and that is precisely why we see, for example, that the americans are going to spend several billion dollars. this is to be spent on restoring the capacity of make chips, that is, they can design them, but most of the production was in china , taking into account the confrontation with china, its more aggressive rhetoric and behavior, we will now see . by the way, this week the reaction to the passage of american military warships through the taiwan strait . the reaction to the visit of the speaker of the house of representatives to taiwan, and then there were several compress delegations, and the governor was there alone, but in fact, all this shows that the world of education is moving in the direction of a possible potential conflict, and therefore the west must arm itself to make itself its

allies and its partners, to which ukraine falls. therefore, this process is underway, but it is definitely slow, because we need weapons now, now we are on fire, now our heroes are dying, the military and there is definitely something wrong with this, and there is a problem with the thinking of such a thing, which means that it is slow not only in washington, although washington is a pioneer in what it provides, and above all in france, germany, by the way, germany itself is among the top five of the largest arms suppliers. that is why there are many unconditional ones, very rightly you noted this matter, instead, there is another story, an unexpected application, there is such a character in russian politics who served whom putin gave to hold the mace, so to speak, for a while it was about medvedev's mission, so he started talking about some new guarantees for russia, security guarantees for russia, it

takes so much, i don’t know, it took centuries to build an empire to now ask for certain guarantees , it’s actually about the ukrainian issue, let’s go now let's briefly listen to this from a war criminal who regularly issues such and such statements so and so and so and try to analyze this matter participation in the north atlantic alliance - this is a necessary but already insufficient condition. which president putin said, that's how only the guarantees will be worked out in the contract with all the necessary parties attached, this will be enough conditions to stop операцию well of course predostizhenii ея целый all our guarantees all our proposals are well known to everyone, i will not repeat them, mr. oleksandr, we are

not, i am not to blame khrestina, you know, we are not, so to speak, a professional, we are psychiatrists, so that is, it will be a separate direction for the analysis of what he said medvedev yes, but there is also a story about some guarantees and new guarantees. how do you see this story ? well, first of all, why did they talk about it like this, and on the other hand, so that some possibly unwritten agreement could be included in this framework, the opinion is rich in 1975 mr. brezhnev wanted to finally secure the borders of the soviet union and agreed to what we call the final acts of the osce and the osce at that time , and the helsinki act, which guaranteed the inviolability of the borders and the use of force in order to change them, and then he swallowed this the so-called third is this third basket of human rights and then

the helsinki process began and, by and large, it ultimately led to the collapse of the evil empire . even if we don't tie this clown up there, it's just that russia really wants to export a report for all territories, there can be no such guarantees, since it has violated the principle of border closure, first of all , since it claims spheres of influence in the post- soviet space, since it claims certain things that are absolutely unacceptable. medvedev said that i will not list those conditions of moscow . europe is the most vulnerable from boredom to possible russian aggression, which remembers several sections of poland, the occupation of the warsaw pact, all these joys

of life, they must remain defenseless in this new e-e guarantee system offered by moscow . nor is training at all not to appear there as much as 100 km from the border of the russian federation. that is, it is not only on the european part, but even there, let's imagine . the black sea has no entrances because it is a privileged russian territory there and they believe that there should be no one except er russia er certainly that they would not like to see on the territory of the european continent american er american nuclear weapons are now there in five countries, well, such outdated atomic bombs, but they are a deterrent factor, including in germany, italy, in the same turkey, of course, they would not like to

see missile defense systems there as the elements of which are in romania and poland, in fact they want europe to be defenseless against a nuclear state that has one and a half thousand nuclear strategic weapons without charges and tens of thousands of different e-e tactical ones without charges, had this horde and there in over a million e military now putin signed a decree on increasing the number of his armed forces. well, definitely with such an aggressive ideology that they have chosen for themselves, especially the last few, that is, they stopped hiding their aggressive goals starting from february 24. and before that, they were just secretly thinking about it, that's why absolutely no one will give such guarantees to russia. and how can there be a guarantee for russia when it violates the principle of

inviolability of borders? to what extent it looks like they feel that they have nowhere to ask, that is, well, the bells will lose to a strategic company, so definitely russia, well , it stands well, unfortunately, we cannot hope for what we dream of, our hopes to invest in our strategy but russia has taken a step towards actual destruction itself and we are accelerating it, this very destruction, but they certainly think a little differently. it seems to me that they can sit through this time because it is an authoritarian state. there are no elections. people definitely do not go to rallies and will not protest against a special military operation, i am not talking about any other things, and the plus is superimposed on this are the crises in europe, and in the world that russia has intensified or created, and this is energy, this is food, this is the

slowdown of the european economy. that is, all these problems, as they think with the kremlin, they will help shake european unity. well, plus there are still useful idiots in certain countries, for example, in germany, leftists who say that we need to negotiate with putin and stop providing defense to ukraine. crazy is not enough i would say that's why they are playing in their imagined distorted and to them it seems that everything is normal . a country to nuclear terrorists because it threatens , of course, with nuclear weapons and our zaporizhzhya nuclear power plant, and just the other day there was a big conference there that has been going on for 5 years about nuclear non-proliferation, the russians did not want to sign the final document because it

mentioned ukraine and the right to actually manage and own it with their nuclear facilities, i mean with power plants. but they said that they were harassing russia, they were making some unfair demands on russia, and that's why they didn't want to to sign an extremely important document that in the 60s. this was a process launched after the practical alexander oleksandr. of defense strategies worked for you dear tv viewers 13th hour 43 minutes shevchenko is the self-proclaimed president of belarus which well, as i understand it, i am holding the whole country hostage and

all his people and declared that ukrainians are not nazis at all, but good people, neighbors of belarus, that is why he considered it necessary to congratulate on independence day . there was an epic greeting, and personally, i developed a very good and good attitude towards ukrainians, or the western e-e-e western tendencies, who are called nothing in there is nothing bad about them, they are not natsiks natsiks are those who are on top, starting with those who smoke, sniff , drink and then whine from tv screens, and good people are our people, so i considered it necessary to congratulate the ukrainian people as always, this is dementia dear god, ihor tyshkevich, an analyst at the ukrainian institute of the future, and pavlo latushko, deputy chairman of the united transitional cabinet of the cabinet of belarus, are in touch with us. greetings, dear igor and pavla, glory to ukraine lives in belarus uga forever, well, accordingly, we wanted you to comment on the current signals that

presented by the belarusian dictator, there have been changes in his rhetoric again. are these the reasons of a psychological plan? as khrystyna yaskiv hints , does he still feel that a great crisis is now approaching for him and his beloved in the kremlin p latushko how do you see the situation well, it seems to me that first of all it is necessary to evaluate eh from the point of view of emotional, this final cynicism is heard from the mouth of a person who gives the territory of the country to launch missile attacks on the neighboring state a-a but this thesis is important understand why he does it and he does it first of all for the internal audience in belarus, not for the external audience or for ukrainians inside belarus, he says that he is a ukrainian for peace and friendship with ukraine he gives citizenship, he accepts ukrainian refugees

. he has always advocated a peaceful solution to this problem , and this is picked up by propaganda . it's ours, but we understand in his understanding, ours, it's ours, and russians and ukrainians, belarusians don't really distinguish between nations, he doesn't distinguish between nationalities, he doesn't distinguish between the right to self-determination of these states if we are talking about the prospects of good-neighborliness, which lukashenko mentions in his greeting, then the neighborhood is possible, definitely and unconditionally, but only without lukashenka. it is impossible for the russian armed forces to launch missile strikes from the airspace into belarus from the territory of belarus. well, lukashenko

began to threaten the kremlin the next day to blackmail europe and the world with nuclear weapons, eh, that is, as if he is already trying to justify his departure in this way in front of his plowman. thank you, mr. tyshkevich. how do you see the reasons for the change in lukashenko's rhetoric, well, this is not the first time here, mr. latushka, it is very difficult, and he noticed that after lukashenko's statements, it seems more peace-loving people are reacting to the kremlin. i want to remind you that after the frontal airstrike, lukashenko went to putin, and before that there were attempts to say that the war is not on time, because the ukrainians are friends, and they are coming right away the simple question is that for lukashenka, the number one point is the preservation of one's own power, he understands that if putin sinks, he will also sink - there is a very good example, let's assume and the same

takayev, there is a good example of aliyev, there is a good example of retehan in these the president cannot in any case be called democratic and lukashenko will try to send signals not so much not only in the domestic field and to a certain extent in the external field because the previous one speaks well of ukraine. i want to remind you that before the conclusion of the so-called grain agreement, and lukashenko had high hopes for the fact that, let's say, sanctions will be lifted from belarusian potash and part of the flows will go through belarus . is an independent partner, this is also what is happening, and now lukashenko will try to send some signals,

thinking that it will not go unnoticed in moscow. limit the field as much as possible to maneuver belarus , regardless of who will be the president, whether it is democratic or whether it is lukashenko, well, the most glaring example is this, let's remember the chick on which we admired that it is a democratic revolution , accordingly, for these exercises, it is important to smear belarus as much as possible, exactly as a brand as the name of the state in its war in order to maximally limit the possibilities of political drift of belarus in any direction except russian. thank you , mr. igor, well, accordingly, the question is for mr. latushka how do you see the reasons for the change in the kremlin's rhetoric ? a couple of minutes ago, we aired a quote from medvedev, who began to babble about the fact that russia will need guarantees, it's not just about the so

-called in quotes, not ukraine's entry into nato, but they will demand guarantees of their own security, i would ask you as a professional, experienced diplomat and acting deputy of the belarusian government in exile to comment on such a story, well, we understand that this rhetoric appears periodically, it arises and disappears, again, that's a guarantee i may not have heard what medvedev said, but what was said earlier in the public about the complete demilitarization of ukraine, a-a, about the fact that it is not joining nato, about the fact that russia actually preserves the territories that it currently occupied, a-a question is this a proposal for negotiations, we definitely understand with you that this cannot be a proposal for negotiations for the ukrainian side, so it can simply be a diplomatic fame game that sells to the west

and a thesis that is beneficial to them, look at russia already even this is ready in 100 negotiations about something. he says that everything is going well with the plowed soil of the european political scene of european society that it is necessary to negotiate with the russian federation in a peaceful way, or to continue the war. hey , igor, what are the reasons why you see this rather strange statement of medvedev? and why is it strange because we agree that he is actually asking for some formal security guarantees for the russian federation, that is, he does not start preaching in his style about a huge threat to the entire civilized russian world from the ukrainians, whom he would like to transfer to concentration camps somewhere beyond the urals. no, he starts talking about security guarantees for russia again, this is the same thing that putin said when he was three

years ago, do you remember the first e-mail contact kurt volker and the russian establishment when russia came up with the idea of ​​the so-called bill of great agreement that let's move to a multipolar world and in fact the influence and in the words of medvedev - this is just a repetition at a new stage because there is such a thing as a certain part of european politicians are tired of the war, they just want to stop what they call a crisis. for us, this is a war on any terms, it is very similar to the 14th year, and even to freeze, and against this background, russia is returning to the same uh, rhetoric that, ok, let's make a big deal with it, but in fact, let's divide the sphere of influence and russia will be a geopolitical player, it's also very simple, in other words, and it's another

matter for the kremlin. that now the situation is much worse because if we take the end of the 21st year and beginning of the 22nd by the way when, including, let's call it, envoys came to ukraine, either from european diplomats or from putin, who said that let's really make some compromises, the 100 as of today is actually the united states of america, there is china, and with various political rhetoric and the second state they expect a weakening of foreign policy positions because in any case it will be a multipolar measure in one form or another, but the question is one and how many poles if at the end of the 21st year they clearly said three or more, then today it is well, two, maybe three, but russia is not on this list , and accordingly, a certain change in rhetoric, certain signals from the kremlin - this is an attempt to jump in again to secure a place for itself, at least not at the great

pole, but in a small way, because if we talk about the region, let's remember the position of turkey, which is not breaks contacts with russia, but it also supports ukraine, and it is quite cynically and soberly rebuilding its testing, a cringe-worthy super-state, and for russia it is also a threat to the issue of iran, and accordingly of course, the kremlin wants again, it was great to return to this multifaceted agreement, let's say so. now i will quote, if dud does not have brains, then the polish military does, and they know

that messing with belarus means immediately receiving a nuclear bomb. this is the story, if you apply it to the statements that the belarusian su-24 tactical bombers could be converted to carry nuclear weapons. i see mr. igor smiling, but first i will ask mr. pavel. tell me, please, mr. pavel. well, we understand that in the event of an escalation of the confrontation , it is unlikely that the russian federation will escalate the nuclear war with its own hands. threat in the world, but hands and mustaches are more cunning, and in principle it is possible to do it, it seems to me and yes unfortunately, we have a connection or not a colleague yes, mr. pavlo, if you heard my question , is everything like this, is belarus, or rather, the regime in belarus now , i would not become a real threat to the nuclear security of the world, after all, if i reduce

the words that lukashenko declares, lukashenko has his own character if he says similar things, he tries to achieve this, or during his 28 years of administration and a certain period, i had to work not far from him. i know that he is a vengeful, vindictive person, and he achieves those negative goals that he sets for himself. he was engaged in political murders. he repressed civil society. year he started the most massive repression and said that he would find all those who opposed him and we can see it and now it is happening before our eyes he said war against ukraine and he joined this war against ukraine so i would not stand here - it is treated simply as his rhetoric, and of course it cannot be realized without the support of russia, of course it is a su-24 rather than a su-25. as experts will judge, i would not rule out that if nuclear weapons are not located somewhere near

belarus either on the territory of belarus or not it means that it will not appear. in the near future, there are any international agreements. they will be indifferent to them, and they have already been violated today in the hands of lukashenko. we see in the face of lukashenko a nuclear blackmailer. this is happening and because europe and the world always allow lukashenko to do what he does and now they allow him to do, including these statements , he does not react to this in any way, being on vacation i don't know nonsense, but this is a strategic mistake of europeans, there is a sufficiently large number of tools for the punisher to force lukashenko even uses the norms of international law, but they don't even use it, not the international trimal, not the responsibility for the seizure of the plane, not the hybrid war, which for five years started against poland , lithuania is here for last week, 200 to 129 people in polish and lithuanian, do not send a

nuclear threat now, i will say that when there will be nuclear weapons, then it will be too late then russia fulfill your strategic task. to finish , to cut off belarus from europe, and unfortunately i don't want to talk to my country, so the balcony in the form of belarus will be a threat to the permanent system, both for ukraine and for latvia, lithuania and poland, and in the european union as a whole. concrete actions, steps, thank you, olena, please . and the first su-24 of the fourth, which lukashenko talked about, will be removed from the armament of the belarusians in 2003. if there is anything left, it is the su-25 scrap near the 20th century, but the question is that the belarusian airplanes, airplanes, they were not modernized, there was no order at the 558th aircraft repair plant in baranovyshchy, they also did not fly to the territory of russia. therefore, it is rather desirable, another matter that, uh,

russia recently, two weeks ago, conducted nuclear blackmail on its own, no one agreed to this well, as a result , he didn't react as the kremlin expected . that's why they added the question of lukashenka, that if it seems that russia is more adequate, then we will give it to this person, but you understand that for lukashenka, he is in the first place of power if he gets nuclear weapons in his hands that is, the issue will be a danger for russia, that is why russia will not give lukashenko nuclear weapons, it will be if it is placed accordingly with russian troops, but such blackmail is again on the one hand, on the other hand, to frighten the same european union pushed to this big agreement to advance the thesis that was fixed in the resolution of the bundestag from e in the fall of 20, just when there were protests in belarus that uh let russia deal with belarus, this means cutting off and fixing its sphere of influence