unit well, but they are moving there, it is very noticeable literally along the border, is there any possibility that this advance along the border will stop, or do we just have to do it now ? region so the shelling continues there and they come from the territory of russia and they strike just on ukrainian territory on civilian objects and so on. well, you can say that the ukrainian army can gather sufficient forces there and conduct its operation, including entering on the territory of russia if you wish, you can do anything, you can set these tasks, but what will be the consequences , that is, we will actually be involved in a new theater of water operations in the area of ​​hostilities on which we will spend our forces, and significant ones at that, and with the fact that we have a front in fact, there is more than 1,000 km of active do we now need to create new

areas of the active front where the russians with their er , still have superiority in artillery, for example , they can calmly move away for another 20 km and continue shelling er or border areas or those areas of concentration of ukrainian troops, which, for example, we conducted an operation in this direction as well as in the kharkiv direction, so now we can set ourselves the task of completely clearing the territory of the kharkiv region up to the border with russia from russians on the side of on the russian side, there is a concentration of troops there, in principle, in peacetime, russian units were stationed there, and therefore , troops to destroy this infrastructure again

. is this a priority task right now, maybe it would be possible to accomplish this task of clearing this territory, but i think that the command of the armed forces is still more visible in which directions to concentrate forces now without getting involved in too wide fronts of hostilities, because it is possible to stretch yourself for two thousand kilometers, and you can concentrate the execution of tasks on those areas that are considered the most important, because all this is done with a strategic planning, that is, if we carry out this task, then we have the opportunity to complete three more tasks, and if we complete all three other tasks, then we have the opportunity to pay for the tasks and they. begin to concentrate ukrainian troops, we simply do not have such forces, and if we take symmetrical actions

, uh, try to oppose the russian army, we will not succeed, the russian army, no matter what we say, is an order of magnitude larger in all indicators that is, they have a bigger country, they have more resources , they have more money, they have a larger population, and so on, and that's why our tactics are our strategy, i would even say it's an asymmetry, and therefore we can't talk about what we can just take and on the entire front to wipe out the russian troops at once, the idea is clear, now let's switch a little to what is actually happening in the donbass around donetsk, uh, and i, the question will be for viktor tregubov, uh, viktor look well, until recently, it was about what precisely the district this bakhmutavdiivka, well, around there, the slavic

is concentrated, well, the main forces of the russians, well, that is, there was more of a battalion of tactical groups, there was only more of the main artillery, everything was there, as a result of this, we have just there, well, such offensive attempts that are not are they stopping, has this situation changed at least a little now, or can it continue to change, because once again there is this infamous third corps, which is being formed there and not deformed in any way. and where, at first, it was said that it would most likely also be thrown there somewhere to the district eh, bahmutu eh, now it seems that this situation is not at all like you, well, actually, you are evaluating these possibilities. will we have any? well, if there is not a cessation, then at least a cessation of hostilities, that is, in the area of ​​bahmut, or is it vain

to hope? what do you think ? i believe that now the russians still know where they are going to send the three same third corps. there is already certain information that it seems that some of its parts are already in the crimea, which means that they will strengthen either the kherson or zaporizhzhia direction, but so far this is not clear. pysanok is actually yes, they shifted the accents a little, they moved a certain part of the segment to the south, and it is not in kherson region, but in the zaporizhzhia region, which shows that they are probably afraid that ukrainians are actually under kherson. zaporizhzhia, that's why i think that it's possible. that the intensity directly in the donetsk region will decrease a little, although in principle the russians still have enough opportunities to support

. they know where the main blow of the ukrainian troops will come, they most likely expect more problems in the south, therefore, it is in the south that they make certain accents, well, this is logical, because in the south, the swarthy formations in the south are struck at intervals, so it is somehow logical to assume that it is the south will be in the direction of the ukrainian content, although again it can also be a film. well, if we talk a little about the south, it is obvious that we can not talk there. now, i will even explain a little to the audience why we cannot talk about some specific things to talk eh well eh first of all it is dangerous for our troops because when the troops are advancing if we start to tell in detail something happens then our troops came under attack eh first of all secondly we don't have any need

it is also wrong to tell our enemies what the priority goals are and where our troops should go . but nevertheless, i would still ask mr. viktor to say a little about what global the goals we set in the south, that is, what are we trying to achieve there global goal in the south, that the war of its liberation , but if we are talking about the goals of a more, well, lower level, therefore, here, it is quite obvious for us, it is necessary to drink russians, at least from the kherson region, at least from its right-bank part. well, that the goal is quite obvious, so that they cease to threaten the right of the coast in general, as its reason for maritime preservation in such a way. of course, there are goals,

e.e. , release to the ministry of foreign affairs. priority - of course, it is actually kherson and the gas station. thank you. well, the same question is also the same to panas musya. well, that is, how do you see the development of hostilities in the south? well, actually, what can happen there or how can our enemies behave even like that here , the reaction of the russian troops is more interesting here, that is, they are obvious, because if we take a global assessment and i would offer them such a simulation, let's imagine that here now is just a mirror image and in is in such a situation ukrainian troops, they actually hung out on the

dnieper, there are quite large groups there, with various estimates, more than 15,000 troops may be located, but the enemy is constantly cutting off communications, bridges are basically destroyed, that is, you can try to build something there at night, but the river is quite large there , called the dnipro and that's why it's not so easy, and let's imagine what we felt and what tasks we would have set before ourselves, that is, in a normal situation, it is necessary to evacuate all the troops there because well, in fact, i don’t really see the enemy’s military tasks there. well, well, they are there, thanks to the huge expenses, they will hold this bridgehead further. what will it do for the russians to get ukrainian troops so that they do not go further to melitopol or to donbas or to kharkiv oblast, which we just talked about, well, the task is the same, that is,

any kind of stay of troops at some bridgehead in the area should have some goals of expanding this bridgehead, for example, well, it is clear that they set mykolayiv and odesa of transnistria are faced with the task of uniting with the occupied crimea in the occupied crimea, cutting off ukraine from the sea, and then in parallel going to the kryvyi rih dnipro and so on, that is, strategically everything is clear here too, but obviously they no longer have and will not already have enough forces to carry out these tasks, it is just obvious now that the maximum task is somehow to hold the right bank of the dnieper, and this raises the following question , since the troops can hold their own there. well, their obvious task is to extend it until winter, when such stages of a hybrid confrontation will begin, we know that putin wants to freeze europe and obviously

he would like to, that is, global russian generals want to freeze the front line, that is, they can no longer do anything in donbas, in fact, even operationally, maybe they will have some tactical efforts, but i very much doubt that they will gain a foothold after all, on the right bank of the dnieper, because it is obvious that if they lose the right bank, they only said that and this actually changes the strategic picture. a complex energy, economic and political attack on europe plus the freezing of the front in ukraine will give it the opportunity sometime in the spring. it is possible to gather strength and, er, in the background of a seeming decrease in

western aid to ukraine, to conduct another operation of its own, so it is obvious that the main thing for russia now is to hold the right bank in order to not to give ukraine the opportunity to fix the southern front and thus free up part of the forces to carry out an operation in another direction, and this is where, er, there is an immediate understanding of what he wants the ukrainian army once again supports its colleague in a strategic plan, obviously now completely cut off communications close this group and gradually lead it to make a decision to surrender, die or try to escape, well , it will be very difficult to escape there, but with some improvised means, because there is still time in principle because the ukrainian army is acting absolutely correctly, and as they say now, the fashionable word is softening, softening, softening this group from the middle, that is,

penetrating to the entire depth and to the let's say this to everyone dimensions, bit by bit, destroying it from the middle, you can even say this is a group that will obviously not be able to receive reinforcements in the near future and , importantly, will not even be able to receive resources that would allow them to even maneuver to the full extent that their command thank you well, severyn nalyvayku has just now appeared on the phone, he is a fighter of the resistance movement free ukraine. he is located just in the southern direction. i congratulate you all severyns. i congratulate glory to ukraine. glory to the heroes, well, as much as possible. can you tell us about what is happening, your immediate impressions of what is happening in your direction, and actually, well, maybe there are some feelings about what the enemy is doing, the subscriber

is happening, everything is expected for a long time for ukrainians, but how nicely reharchubarov recently said about crimea, but what in in crimea, people behave very differently depending on who is who and exactly the same in all territories, because let's not forget there are hundreds of thousands of people living there, especially in the east and south. there are a lot of uh well, not collaborators yet, but even people who are waiting for the russian peace or are already cooperating with it, and it is clear that due to objective circumstances, they cannot express their opinion , so it seems to us that they do not exist, but in fact there are such people. what about deprivation on the front, it is optimistic for those who may have doubted that they are possible, but in general, optimism is called for by the military, and in general, this is how we see the situation, we must be restrained, this is a feature of war and it is reasonable, that is because war ours is not a sprint, but a herd distance, uh,

you need to use those resources and those traits for which you have trump cards, what strengths you have, different tactics of war, and wolves, for example, can run for a long time behind the herd, not attack, but just wait until the herd will get tired. that's when he becomes easy prey and also now we understand that time is already playing against ukraine and ukrainians have long been characterized by such attempts to share the skin of an unkilled bear, they constantly talk about how many republics russia will disintegrate and so on, i and myself in kyiv have such a map hanging the map of north asia, but finally now these reasons are now becoming meaningless and cease to be er groundless, so i think in the future er, well, after the war, there should definitely be a tribunal and the demilitarization of russia from the control zone and so on, but this is the work of diplomats and special services and regarding our situation, well, at the moment when we can’t

talk about our parts and share our information, it’s clear, you can at least create an impression from the background of what is happening on the other side, and it is comforting for us because it is very there are many of their veterans, not just one girkin, there are various public figures who fought in ukraine or were never here but who promote the war for their population, we look at them carefully and we see that we have grounds for restrained optimism well , i am interested in in this regard, you know, they showed strimiusov, who says that he will never return to ukraine, but he says that he is from zvoronizha, yes, from the veronizhe hotel, that is, what information is there about the behavior of those people who rushed there to run and cooperate with the enemy, how are they now behaving? i think that they

feel very restless and not only rushed into such a lot, well, in particular, it became known about balytskyi, who fled from melitopol to the crimean peninsula , fled to russia in general, and from there tells how he manages here in ukraine e- he hid in the crimea, this is expected because, um, everything is going to the point that we will defeat the frightened russian army . this is very good because, uh, the moral and psychological state is sometimes generally decisive, that is, the blows are very important, which we we cause, i mean, a projectile with projectiles, but a projectile flies into one object, it injures there, destroys the infrastructure, kills people, and it spreads much more panic, and this panic is contagious, and you see that panic will be characteristic not only of military personnel , but also of civilians, because now in the occupied territories e- it can be seen that a lot of damage is caused by the hurricane to us , the non-flights are only a and, and,

various objects are mined and blown up. that is, our resistance movement, our special operations forces are active, and it is precisely our activity here in the south of the movement that surrounds ukraine, too. focused on cooperation with the population, active in one way or another, the front line. thank you, it was severyn nalyvaiko, a fighter, a mobile ukrainian, thank you for his story. there is not much time for mykhailo samus, but actually with regard to the zaporizhzhia npp, well, that is, we understand the general context and their general well, well, there is such blackmail around nuclear facilities, but i am curious to the point if there is uh well, let's say, what role can be about this object in relation to hostilities. how can we wait here, because now they are shelling ours from there, that's one story, but now, during

some hostilities, there are attempts at a counteroffensive or something else, that is, how do we have to relate to this because now there will be a mission there again, well, it's not long, but a few days, what can you wait for? i think that the key thing here is the position of the world community, which should clearly state to russia that... and in connection with the fact that their plan failed well if we imagine what if on february 24, of course, the russians occupied a large part of ukraine there, and now there would be some kind of yanukovych sitting in kyiv. okay, well, the world community would say, well, the ukrainians are dealing with the russians, and let them deal with the nuclear power plants, there would be more than one. but the power plant. we remember that a similar situation was at the chornobyl nuclear power plant in our country in the kyiv region at the first stage of the war, but now when it is

obvious that russia's military operation has already failed and there will be no more offensives, the international community, the world community must clearly state to russia that they must get out of there, there is no point in being in the russian occupation. they have no prospects there, they understand that it is a ukrainian nuclear power plant, there is nothing for them to do there, and that is why i think that now the situation is not must clearly state that if russia will leave its military e-e structures there, then it may be excluded from competing and the entire nuclear e-e business, which includes tens of hundreds of billions of dollars there, which on the international stage performs a dewdrop, he can cover himself with a mine basin and i think that this should play the main role, that is, the presence of those units in the kremlin. someone is playing and trying to demonstrate, as i

understand it. e blackmail which is not actually based on anything, there are no prospects in russia to expand its military presence, which means they need to think about the future, and the future is the loss of the entire nuclear business. well i would act like this, for example, to have this store inspection on the spot and have to come and clearly give an ultimatum to you, you are given a week to simply free the object in full in full preservation and free this territory and leave there for 10 km . you are engaged in your own war. have already lost in fact somewhere in other conditions. and this is an idea that has already been voiced literally. well, yesterday, why should this station be turned off so that it practically did not

work? for some reason moreover, on the eve of the pan-european energy crisis and against the background of the fact that president zelensky said that ukraine can help europe survive this energy crisis during the winter at the expense of the export of ukrainian electricity well, of course, if we shut down several of our nuclear power plants first, we have a deficit , which putin would really like, and of course , the energy balance of europe is even more disturbed. well, of course , this idea plays into the hands of russia. it seems to me that means ukrainian nuclear power plant - this has absolutely no relation, russia is not there and it has no right to be there at all according to the whole e-e canon, except that they are e-e there in an armed way, that is, they, as the occupier, seem to exercise effective control over this object but i think that we need to blackmail russia once again with the loss of their

nuclear contracts just a few days ago they signed a two billion contract with south korea on the construction of nuclear energy facilities well, i think so it's simple it's just some kind of nonsense so russia occupied a nuclear power plant and took over or blackmails someone else's nuclear power plant with a nuclear nuclear disaster and at the same time actually signs contracts with our partners it's kind of simple well i don't know surrealism actually it is necessary to ban any contacts rosatom with the international co- torist until they get involved in the zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant. yes, it would be more. it seems to me that there is really some significant way of influence than telling them that they are wrong now yes yes yes, yes, that’s true. my question is for viktor tregubov. mr. tregubov himself already spoke about the

chances that there might be some freezing of the conflict, and how do you feel about these conversations, that is , where do they come from, and, well, let's put it this way, now we can talk about it, about the fact that there might be some kind of stoppage of the combatants , it was profitable for them now. but the situation now would be for them to recalculate now, as if to fix everything that we are talking about with trees, but in the country, that is why the question is, what is that? hardly really hardly because well we will not stop at the de-occupation of the territory, we will not stop at missile attacks on the russian occupation objects on the territory of ukraine, the ukrainians will not stop in the sense of collaborators, because even if it is for us, well, in order to establish such a freeze

, it is necessary that both want everything parties or that one of the parties should be simply forced to force the other, now neither side can, and at least the ukrainian side simply has no interest in such a freeze. well, it simply will not improve the situation for us she is policing the situation. it is more likely for the russians or we are not interested in it. that is why this will most likely not happen. well, some of them are already saying that. it can be said that now, uh, now there are already some, well, as if the balance of power or even a little began to equalize. in the direction of ukraine, is this true or is there another nuance that we should have in order to be able to say that we at least have an advantage? well, you understand, there is a balance. and

there is, but there are different types of balance. boxing if two boxers have not yet started to fight there is a balance between them, but it is a passive balance, but if they are already there for 11 rounds, they have the same plus-minus points. this is not the same balance, this does not mean that they will stop right now, the science will say, and everyone will say well, well, well, not whose no, it is so it doesn't work, they will fight until the last round and it will be seen there. maybe there will be a count. or maybe someone there will count by points. we have just such a balance now, but it is an unstable balance, it is not a passive balance, it is not a stoppage. on the contrary, it is very tough . in the process of which actually and or the other side will sooner or later surround the other side. well, it may win on points. but it seems to me that you are actually surrounded. that's how ukraine is slowly leveling off. ukraine will get new weapons

. russia, on the other hand, already has a crisis in some directions, and the fact that they, for example, take drones from the same iran is, to put it mildly, of low quality, i only show that they have started to run out of their own reserves. well, i actually think that we will achieve some kind of superiority in our direction when, in addition to artillery, we will have such opportunities so that russian planes do not fly at least over our front line in donetsk, well , near donetsk and luhansk, i will consider such ladies achieved by our troops not are bombarded from the air, this would be very good, unfortunately, we ran out of time.

week well, look at the express in the mykolaiv region, 17-year-old andrii kachanovsky disappeared during the occupation, and it is already known that the russian military was involved in this terrible story. andrii and his older brother were simply taken from home by armed russians, unfortunately, we only have this poor quality photo boy, but their sister svitlana told us about the details of the disappearance of andriy and his brother. every evening i go to bed every night, i pray to god that they come home alive and you close your eyes and just see the picture before your eyes, are they there? are they still alive or not alive, have they eaten or not? andriy kachanovsky lived with his mother and older brother in the village of bogoroditske, 31 km from kherson. the village has been under occupation since april. and on august 3, early in the morning, russian

soldiers came to the house where andriy lived. the handcuffs now twisted them, the handcuffs were thrown into the car like a sack of potatoes , and the minor andriy kachanovsky was taken with his older brother towards kherson, and from that day on, nothing is known about their fate, the russians refused to explain anything, the list was explained by my mother she asked for what reason, why are you taking her away ? they said we'll figure it out and let her go. and although the russians didn't explain anything, ms. svitlana says that they came to the house not at random, but purposefully to take andriy and his brother . they will pick up and say

where your son is, they already know where they are going. by the way, on the same day, the russians also detained the father of andriy kachanovsky, who lives separately but also in the village of bogoroditske, just doing something there that someone in the same on the same day my father was also taken away, they put handcuffs on him, put a towel on his head, wrapped it with tape and took them away. he didn't see anything. well, my father let him go for two days. on the third day, they let him go, but why didn't they let andrii kachanovsky and his brother go, and where they are now is unknown but mrs. svitlana does not lose hope, she appeals to each of you to help with the information that you have provided, maybe you have seen them somewhere. it will be at least a drop in the ocean so that there is some hope that they really are