yes, we will continue. thank you for that. serhiy zgurtsova. serhiy gurskyi, the director of the defense express agency, is the host of the military summaries of the day column. i would like to say a few words about the fact that there is a statement from the head of the international agency on ms. nuclear safety, energy, and threats. he stated what the mission in zaporizhia will do. nuclear power plant, when it will get there, we don't have information about the fact that it has already gotten there yet. he said that the location will last at least several days and, if possible, it can be extended, he told in an interview with the public our mission will last for several days, said the money, if we can establish a permanent presence, it will be longer, but this is our first stop, which will take several days, the official noted, today representatives of the mkt mission arrived in zaporizhzhia and from there they should leave right before the energy donation to the zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant, the russians told them

arranged certain obstacles to overcome the roadblocks and their reference points on the road to the energy supply, thus hinting at what you see. if you listened to us and drove through crimea, in particular, or through the occupied territory, you got to the zapiska nuclear power plant faster, because you wanted to do everything right and in accordance with the laws, you brought them into the territory of ukraine from abroad, well, in particular, from poland or where they came from - i don't know kyiv from the first, then to zaporizhzhia, then you did it wrong, you didn't knock us, that's why you have it and they, um, uh, they are creating various obstacles for them on the road to the zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant, in any case. well, you already understood that the mission will reach the energy donor, it's important just to the results of this work were positive, first of all, for the security

of ukraine and the entire region. was held in the capital of the czech republic in prague, which was said to have been approved. well, not only about this, but also about something else in a moment in the world about ukraine column, the ministers of foreign affairs of the member states of the european union sat down, talked and agreed, at least not about everything and not about what would be better, i would not even say about the main thing today in prague at the meeting of the heads of the foreign affairs departments of the eu member states, there was no consensus as in the end and always. the idea of ​​introducing and terminating the agreement on the simplified visa procedure for russia , that is, now it will be much more difficult and longer for them to

open schengen visas, but unfortunately they did not agree on a unified ban on entry to the territory of the european union, it's a pity, because it would be very, very necessary. well, what was said before the start of this meeting, now i will tell the russians that it is necessary to ban entry into the territory of the member states of the european union, about this today, before the start of the meeting of the european ministers, the head of the foreign policy department said estonia's urvas rein salon, in his opinion, his country, together with other eu members, can do this on its own in accordance with the principle of ensuring its own national security, but mr. reysol did not specify whether it would be apply to all citizens of the russian federation or only to individual citizens by the way, rein salo was supported by his colleagues from latvia, lithuania, poland and finland. well, according to published statistics, from the beginning of the russian

aggression in february 2024 of this year, about 700,000 people entered these five countries russian well, mr. rein said that later those russians almost did not stay in his country, at least, but went somewhere further to europe in order to spend their vacations, so he emphasized that there is no need for such unfortunately , russian aggression in ukraine is completely unacceptable, so president putin must be clearly told about this and done. this can be done by introducing restrictions on the extradition of schengen troops to the citizens of the aggressor-aggressor country. in prague, the head of denmark's foreign policy department, apko, said, in particular, he said, and then the quotes are very unfortunate, but the head of european diplomacy, jozepa borel , either does not fully understand something or is afraid of something today, again before this meeting, he

said that he would do everything possible to prevent international discord between russia and europe. well , in this way, he made it clear to everyone that he does not support the introduction of a unified ban. well, mr. borel added that this issue will be discussed at today's summit, as we can see, it was discussed and nothing came of it, but since this meeting is unofficial, according to the head of the euro diplomat, no practical decisions will be made, there will only be a discussion after which a political decision, well, it really was a political decision, but with this political decision of the ministers, they opened the way for further discussion in the european union and its introduction , once again, unfortunately, western anti-russian sanctions are correct and useful , in an interview with the newspaper magdeburger volkstim told german chancellor olafsholz, while he called the introduction of restrictions an important means

of increasing pressure on russia in order to force it to stop the war that it has been waging for more than six months in the head of the german government also added to ukraine that the introduction of restrictions became europe's only and strong response to russia's aggressive actions in ukraine. they surprised putin very much because, according to olaf schultz, he did not expect this . in relation to russia, the head of the german foreign ministry, anna lena berbuk, said this in prague. according to her, this should be done because the return to those the relations with russia that existed before february 24 this year will no longer exist, at the same time ms. berbuk added that now for the european union, the european union must focus on four main things, namely strengthening its own defense capabilities

, collective brussels must support those russians who oppose putin and his regime. well and in addition, the member countries are obliged to continue to support ukraine. well, and to cooperate with partners around the world for the sake of international law. well, i agree with almost everything, only regarding the support of the russians, i disagree all the same, i believe that all russians are to blame for the fact that putin attacked ukraine and they should all be responsible for it, mr. shochi did not convince me. in the event that russia does dare to hold illegal referendums on the temporarily occupied territories of ukraine, the united states of america will introduce new sanctions this was stated during the briefing by the deputy head of the press service of the us state department, vedant patel. his transcript was published today on the website of the us state department. according to mr. patel, washington has a whole set of restrictions, but due to the fact that the

russian budget is mostly replenished from the sale of oil and gas, therefore, the reduction of such types of income due to sanctions could have a strong impact on the russian economy, and they are on oil. it can range from $40 to $ 60. but in the united states of america they talk about it, but in europe they don’t talk about it, they don’t do it, but the following information, to my great regret, did not surprise me at all about the training of servicemen of the armed forces of ukraine in europe should not take place at the level of the european union. such a statement was made by the minister of foreign affairs of hungary, petr sijarto, again in prague, he did not openly oppose such a mission, but said that the issue of training the ukrainian military should be considered separately by the governments of eu member states. well, according to psiart this should not be done uniformly at the level of the entire european community. well,

lately, somehow hungary and official budapest are against almost everything that they propose to do in order to somehow force russia to finish faster war and withdraw their troops, as they once said in one cartoon, and baba yaga against well and finally, the day before, at the age of 92, the first and last president of the soviet union, mikhail gorbachev, died. the media report that he passed away in one of the moscow hospitals after a long illness, but this morning the leaders of many western countries, unfortunately, sang his praises ahead of time and thanked him for the fact that in the late 80s and early 90s he would have changed the world. well, but very little was written about who he was actually writing for the world, they did not write the truth , but there were those who did write, for example, as on his facebook page, the minister of defense of

lithuania arviddas ašu na anu-shau did it, let's listen lithuanians will not glorify gorbachev we will never forget how his army killed civilians in order to continue the occupation of our country, his soldiers shot at unarmed protesters and crushed them with tanks in our memory. he will remain exactly like that, well, it was the victory of the minister of foreign affairs of lithuania, gabriel salonsbergrus i messed up a little, but now let's listen to what defense minister arvitas anushauskas also said. from the point of view of a democratic state, he was a criminal who ordered the suppression of peaceful protests in vilnius, tbilisi, almaty, baku and other cities and did not repent. these are the memories of him. and although they say what is said about the dead is either good or not at all, but not this time, the only plus is that he signed the capitulation of the soviet union, you see,

while other heads of european states almost praise him, there are those who say that he was a criminal, i don't know what you think. i think the same. well, today everything is getting ready for other episodes in order to tell you more, but you remember that our broadcast is still going on, so don't switch, dear ukraine, you know what's in for us everything will be as we want it together everything will be everywhere everything will work everything will be blue and yellow everything will be and everyone will be at home our ukraine you will bloom and

smile again everything will be equal everything will be independence with a holiday like never before if allergy drug citrine will help to free breathing and get rid of itching in the eyes and tearing - cetrine specifically blocks histamine receptors and usually starts to protect against allergies after 20 minutes. on hotline finance hotline finance insurance of course online so that ukrainians don't think about so that they don't talk about the first place still comes out war war and our victory seven days a week from monday to sunday seven different spheres human activity sports culture politics eight

presenters of express journalists experts opinion leaders in real time about the most relevant events through the prism of war every day author's projects on espresso let's return to the conversation and i will join mykhailo basarab political scientist military serviceman of ukraine mr. mykhailo greets you good evening rady see hear we are so on the military side briefly and clearly and clearly, the first question is that the armed units of the russian opposition are uniting in ukraine, at least this there should be some kind of meeting and discussion about what this means. what are the risks and threats for ukraine? well, it seemed like the unification and rallying of all those who are against putin's regime, but in this case, as far as the so-called russian opposition is concerned, this is a special situation and we must be

extremely careful here be careful, and i will explain why, the point is that lately there have been purposeful actions of the so-called russian so-called liberal opposition aimed at formalizing their opposition movement in ukraine and giving it institutional forms, in particular. now we already see that it is not only about the formation of the political opposition, but also about the unification of armed units. this is a separate conversation about what kind of armed units, in particular, russian nazis are supposedly fighting on the side of ukraine against putin, in which putin is not satisfied with what, for example gave russia over to kadyrov's criminality and builders from central asia. that is, they are outright racists and russian nazis who are

actually fighting here against putin, er, for a white , er, purely racial russia. excuse me, tell me you can't be our allies. i have a very big doubt because we can now, by warming up here in ukraine, those who are against putin , call to ourselves no less chauvinists and imperialists than putin himself, that's why he is there ponomariov or other representatives of the russian opposition honestly, i would like them to form an anti-putin front somewhere in germany, belgium, or the netherlands. ukraine is not a place for the deployment of any political, let alone larger, armed russian movements. the army and general denikin and other chiefs who were against the bolsheviks, they were for imperial russia and they did not need an independent ukraine in the years 17-21 well, i think now

the same story we will continue so now we turn to international politics but again well , with reference to ukraine, i am told that macron is asking iran to become a mediator in the negotiations between russia and ukraine. his last name is not mentioned directly, but sources say that it was macron who took such an initiative in the first place. iran is a country that is under the most powerful sanctions after russia, obviously, and well, it’s very unlikely that it can be a mediator, the president should act as a mediator, it’s early in these days i mean, i have one explanation in this situation : macron is chasing after such a global player, he wants to compete with the example of johnson, he wants to compete with the president of the united states of america, emphasizing the

special role of france and the french president , and in order to be noticed, in order to emphasize his desired status, he comes up with some very eccentric proposals here, for example . in general, the french political elite about the formation of a separate army of the european union, that is, as an alternative to nato. that is, it was a proposal like philip of hemp, and of course, that this would be a stillborn initiative. died but i think it is also stillborn and very strange that the proposal that i am in the negotiations between ukraine and russia, iran, which is an absolutely anti-western, aggressively anti-western state, iran, which, let's say, has certain relations with the kremlin precisely on the basis of this anti-western activity with some miracle should be a mediator in the negotiations between ukraine and russia,

if this initiative really belongs to president mykola, he should be ashamed of it, and two more issues: the distribution of vaccination visas to belarus to the prime minister, the minister of foreign affairs of ukraine, petro kuleba, insists that the sanctions should be extended to belarus as well, since it is also an accomplice of russian aggression, will the european union agree to this or not? and i think that there will be even bigger discussions in belarus because we see that the issue of the introduction of a strict visa regime for russian citizens is not simply advancing, i think that there will be even more discussions regarding belarusians, including even from those countries that are strongly in favor of the introduction sanctions against russia as an example. i do not know what the position of lithuania and poland will be, because we know that lithuania and poland very actively support the

belarusian opposition. despite the crazy politics of lukashenka and the top military-political leadership of belarus, we still cannot say that belarusians are as aggressively disposed against ukrainians as the russians precisely because the belarusians are not ready to fight against ukraine. lukashenko has not yet dared to officially declare war against ukraine because he is afraid of the opposition of his own people, so i don't think that now is the time when it is necessary to punish the citizens of belarus, the russians are definitely out of the question here it could be well, er, because their country is waging a war against ukraine, an officially declared war against ukraine, and they are in order to stop it, but the situation in belarus is somewhat different, and i believe that it is precisely with the belarusians that we need to play more delicately here because the belarusians nevertheless spoke out against the election of lukashenka as president and against his declaration of

himself as the president, yes, the belarusians are the belarusian people, they are our potential ally. i think it is only a matter of time before they rise up again and kick out this scumbag, this scumbag puppet of the kremlin, minister of foreign affairs of hungary peter russian he said that the european union will stop the agreement on simplifying the issuance of visas to russians and it will definitely not prohibit the issuance of visas by russians, but the prime minister of poland we, too, said moravetskyi yes, i don't remember that in 1943 the germans went as tourists to great britain. well, i continue to tell us that the people of russia are also the people of the aggressors, that's why he is for it to be banned, that is, lithuania, poland, other countries for which the russian threat is very real. and they are against russia acquiring visas in general, and here are the rich countries of europe. as they say, the old democracy is the european e-e post and the post empire, that's what they said for the fact that

let's issue at least some visas. this can all be explained by the fact that they want to help do the good russians want to leave or do they just want to make money here, let's understand. in a strong alliance between eastern europe, great britain and the united states of america, it is this triangle that will ensure future prosperity and security in the entire european continent, so we must understand what exactly ukraine, poland, lithuania, latvia, estonia, the balkan states, the scandinavian countries, that is, those who are

on the front lines of the fight against eastern evil in the face of russia, they are the bearers of truth and truth, and it is they who should become this reference point for m other european states, therefore e- i would pay less attention to sorry western european politicians who cannot dare to give a decisive answer and ultimately advise them to focus on this vanguard er, which eastern european vanguard which is here now in the war against russia, in fact, the fact that well, they are guided by business interests, they believe that the war will not come to theirs, they do not want to re -establish relations with russian capital and

russian business, not feeling the danger and not understanding that russia started a war against the west in general, one of them may be there in some lebanese socialist, which means it is still a cloud, and mr. mykhailo is forced to thank you, and i will just confirm your words by saying that today two government officials are high-ranking government officials germany's suspicions of cooperation with the russians with russia that they were spying for the benefit of the russian federation. i think that thanks to such people, this kind of policy is also being implemented in certain countries . thank you very much for joining. thank you for your professional comments. may god protect him and may mikhail protect himself in these not easy times, we wish him all the best, now before introducing the next guest, let's move on to another topic in fact, it’s a topic that somehow won’t be discussed now, but it’s actually very important. because you know such quiet topics, someone

makes money and different points on them very well, and they need to be discussed, so we’ll talk about it now, um, now we’ll talk about it. so, the developer is lobbying instead of the law on bomb shelters signed by president zelensky last friday, the verkhovna rada adopted draft law number 7398 on amendments to some legislative acts of ukraine to ensure civil protection requirements during planning and development of the territory in many in the media, the document was presented as a law on bomb shelters in every apartment building, well, for us, this is urgent , we all understand why, but experts say that there is no rule in the document that would oblige the developer to design and build the bomb shelter itself, the construction documentation may provide for the construction bomb shelters and you may not foresee this, you know, the carpathians may or may not dig the relevant remarks, even the main legal department of the apparatus provided the people's deputies

of the verkhovna rada of ukraine and here again you can shout about treason, but we will not shout, we are engaging specialist anna kyriy, she is the deputy head of the architectural chamber of ukraine ms. anna congratulations, you can hear me good evening glad to see and hear well, the topic is difficult, but i want that you explain to our viewers simply and clearly where there is treason or there is no treason and whether we will eventually and when we will wait for buildings with normal bomb shelters as they should be and not basements parking lots and other things in which they hid and continue to hide ukrainians, please. well, i can comment on the law signed by the president and point out once again that what is written in this law does not provide for the mandatory construction of bomb shelters in every new building, as was reported in all

the media headlines. well, i already wrote in my post that the word storage, in principle, is never mentioned in the text of this law. but what concerns shelters in general, these should be separate projects, this is the norm and it is written in the law only what should be in the project documentation is provided for in the section of the project documentation, engineering and technical measures of civil protection, civil defense at the objects, the consequences of all these two and sisters. these are the objects in which there are more than 50 people, but the situation is that this is the norm and currently active and it does not provide for the construction of bomb shelters and this section of the project documentation may not necessarily provide for the construction of a bomb shelter, separate calculations must be made, separate sections are drawn, there are still some kind of storage is moreover and there are objects of so-called

dual use and it is assumed that existing basements or existing shelters or existing underground structures can be used as objects of repeated use, that is, treason if we speak in such categories, it is because in general the mass media and what the people's deputies say and what was communicated to society does not correspond to the essence and text of this law. and that's why i talk about it in such categories, we may not call it treason, but i perceive it as a deliberate introduction of humaneness into the ukrainian society of the president who signs point is sure that he reads it and is not sure that he should read it yes, but he has a team that is obviously prepared to prepare good documents and if you tell ukrainian society that there will be a bomb shelter in every new building and in fact, this is not in the text of the law at all. well,

it is either a deliberate outright lie or not. let 's say it more mildly, misleading the ukrainian society, and they will say that we are there we will prepare by-laws, explanations to the law, we will write it down, it's just that we haven't written everything down yet, or you didn't understand it so well, those are the people who can talk like that, that is, the people who could lobby for exactly this version of the articles and clauses of this law. who are these people there? was indicated in e well, there are authors, you can understand it is a construction mafia of some kind , or what can you call it, who is it beneficial to? hmm , look, come on, i have to communicate these things, you know, there is a concept that everyone knows about, but no one talks about it because it is scary or another thing is that we have a real estate developer lobbying in the parliament . they have their own deputies, and we have all bills related to construction signed by the head of the party, olena shulyak. do you want to name

what i named the names, i'm not angry. the project was written in order to introduce the legislative field of reuse projects in order to be able to buy one project and develop it throughout ukraine and build us khrushchevs, eh, this is the interests of eh developers who who do not want diverse architecture, who do not want to spend time and money on the development of draft documentation, who do not want to develop the architectural industry in principle in ukraine, to make diversity , to strengthen talented architects, to make sure that they do not go abroad, as it is now massively happening, that is, now we architects perceive similar laws how simple are these, well, you know , films in the face, or how to say it more gently, i don't even know, well, let's go through everything with typical khrushchevs, well, well, how about me criminal things. that is, we go to lugano, we go to beautiful presentations, we everywhere

declare the principle of bilberg beta, and we want to collect money from european institutions for this bilberg, and so on. the bomb shelter is being taken by society about the fact that there will now be a bomb shelter in every new building