violation of such and such an article, everything is bad. whether it’s good or not is for other people to decide. there will simply be a list of violations, and these violations will be referred to certain articles of certain international treaties, and that ’s all. is there, mr. oleksandr, can he appeal to anyone at all? megate, everyone was waiting for her, megate, we will come, mother will come, you say, well, this is just a supervisory function, we have a function, yes, on many issues, we have a lot of expectations of some kind international organizations that do not have such an influence except for some moral one, again, it offers certain protocols on how to work, and this is a place where the country can exchange information to understand what is happening, but this happens

voluntarily. the fact is that even at the level of the european union, there are no uniform rules as for nuclear safety, each country decides independently, and i say each country has its own nuclear safety regulators, they exchange information and prepare some general recommendations how should it work, but in the end it's up to each individual country, first of all, and secondly, it's hard to expect russia to suddenly adhere to some international agreements, and all we see is condescension to everyone, that is, they they do not want to fulfill the agreements, moreover, they are trying to show that the whole of the everyday world is based on these agreements, it is not in

the interests of russia, but in the interests of there. to change tactics. i think it is more important here to deal with it later. for example, one task that ukrainian diplomacy faces is to reduce russia's access and influence on international structures, and well, for example, to exclude russia from the direction of smagoter. but there are employees there who are representatives russia, which has influence, and it would be good to reduce it. thank you oleksiy pasyuk , deputy director of the public organization ecodia , or with us, and olena pareniuk commented on the topic of the nuclear power plant, senior naukova an employee of the institute of safety problems of nuclear power plants, nan ukraine, and we will continue the topic of the zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant and offer to watch a story prepared by our colleagues,

the city of energodar, where the zaporizhzhia npp is located, the largest in europe, was captured by the russians at the beginning of march, during the assault, the racists fired several times at the nuclear plant; put out fires, since then the russians staged real terror at the station, they interrogate and torture employees, at least one person was killed the russian army placed fire positions on the air base as a result of russian shelling. on august 25, for the first time in the history of the station, there was a complete disconnection from the power grid. it was only possible to connect the power units . the next day, however, the fields are threatened with a large-scale disaster that can be compared to the japanese fukushima. they say in energoatom - at the zaporizhzhia station, we are from this first stage of focus is already very, very close, because there is only one line, if it is disconnected, the station will switch to diesel and after that it depends on reliability of the work of these diesel engines and about the abundance

of that word, what are the games for the discipline of the zaporizhia region, you don't count , they suggest to me in the end to disconnect the station from the ukrainian network, connect it to the line coming from the occupied crimea, and in this way, in essence, appropriate it as the plant and the current it produces, nuclear specialists are working on it ukraine demands sanctions against a russian state company and accuses russia of nuclear terrorism russia is the only terrorist in the world who managed to turn a nuclear plant into the battlefield and who are consistently doing everything to make europe watch. and where can the wind suddenly blow this radiation, if god forbid, a disaster will happen on august 23, the situation in the armed forces was considered at a meeting of the un security council due to the nuclear threat, after an almost three-month break, french president macron called putin again, however the kremlin rejects the calls

of the world to withdraw its troops from the station, the only thing that managed to agree on is the visas of the gas station mission of the international organization that monitors the peaceful use of atomic energy among 13 experts there are no americans or britons selected by the general secretary of the mgto. russia forced them to be excluded from the list. there are experts from poland and lithuania who are friendly to ukraine, at the same time there are citizens of serbia and china who are more loyal to the kremlin. we thank our colleagues for the story about the zaporizhia nuclear power plant. studio already has a people's deputy of ukraine, a real one, but we welcome you to synyutka, we are glad to see you. greetings, viewers of express and mr. oleg. industry and they say that the mother is still not

a regulatory body and the maximum that they can do , unfortunately, is to state again that they are worried and alarmed and call on russia to withdraw troops and demilitarize the station, however, how important it is before your answer, we also want to leave your colleague mykhailo tsimbalyuk is in touch, a people's deputy of ukraine and also a retired lieutenant general of the ministry of internal affairs, mr. mykhailo we congratulate you good health, what about mr. oleg, what do you think, then how important is this visit megate and what positive can we take from this well, it is important that the delegation came and it is important that the delegation traveled clearly from kyiv from ukrainian territory because this is diplomatically a very serious and significant step and this is another confirmation that there is no reason to visit zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant is there no worst thing

that can happen to this territory if the mageten delegation concludes that the work of the zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant must be stopped or transferred to the so-called cold mode, this is very, very dangerous, because in the territory zaporizhzhia nuclear plant, two completely parallel attempts by putin to destroy ukraine have just coincided. the first attempt is a military one, their troops, their terrorists , their possibility of a radiation storm for the whole of ukraine exists on the territory of zaporizhzhia nuclear plant, but there is also a second part of zaporizhzhia nuclear plant - this is a very high specific weight of electricity production for the needs of the ukrainian industry and economy and we fully understand that it will not be possible to transfer the money there to crimea or to another territory of russia, our armed forces of ukraine will not allow this to be done but the russians can stop the production of

electricity, let's remember last winter , do you remember the discussions in the parliament when we supported european solidarity and many of us shouted let's not sit on the belarusian needle of nuclear energy because it will cost us, no one bought cheap then, they say that someone's offshore companies are involved there but that's not the case even today. the fact is that the belarusians, the muscovites, who are read as hell, will not give us electricity, and a significant reduction in production at the zaporizhzhia nuclear plant is certainly not good. will affect the economy and the lives of ukrainians in the winter. mykhailo tsimbalyuk is with us, generals. how do you assess the visit itself and how effective it can be in practice? well, i do not believe in

an effective visit. they did not miss a mission for a very long time, moreover, already in the uncontrolled territory of ukraine, they were accompanied by the military of the russian federation, including on the territory of the zaporizhzhia nuclear plant. there are also workers there rosat, because of that, we saw that the mission took place for only a few hours. and what kind of racist opinion was being imposed on its representatives, it is not difficult to guess , moreover, until tomorrow, until the third day, the representatives of the megate remained there - this is a delegation from serbia and china, you can eh, as they say, guess which conclusion they will prepare because of that, here one should use a single but very

decisive element, which is the imposition of sanctions on nuclear power and, in general, russia’s disintegration, by the way, and then it trades fuel oil, i.e., fuel for uh, european nuclear power plants should be banned here. well, this is clearly terrorism - it is the highest level of manifestation of terrorism, and it would be good, maga concluded, addressing the countries of the european union and the world community, who would recognize the way the verkhovna rada did of ukraine at the legislative level, that this is a state of terrorism , which uses, including, the peaceful atom for the purpose of blackmail, it is important that the ukrainian authorities do not limit themselves to statements, but clearly and decisively

demand from our european partners sanctions pressure continues sanctions pressure because the zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant is now under armed aggression under the control of terrorists and we do not know how events can develop every hour, especially tomorrow after the last experts of the iaa will leave the territory of the zaporizhia stage, mr. mykhailo, we wanted to colonize i would like to ask in more detail, as you also represent this political force. moreover, you were also the initiator, so why is this initiative needed now, decolonization, what does it consist of? i am convinced that the solutions which

adopted in 14-19 about decommunization, they were very essential for the formation of a completely new perception of our country by ukrainians, and the fact that today neither kharkiv, dnipro, zaporizhzhia, nor even occupied mariupol, berdyansk, or other cities do not accept muscovites, this is precisely the result of the policy of ukrainization and decommunization of our state, but this is not enough because today it is very important to renounce not only communism, today it is very important to renounce racism and the moscow accumulation on our history on our culture on our consciousness, and therefore we must very clearly return to our origins, starting from the simplest, these are names, these are monuments, these are certain symbols, of which there are still many, many on the territory of ukraine today, and ending with

a fundamental approach to our history, because children can not at school, teach and read again about kievan rus, about the cradle. because when there was civilization here in ukraine, there were frogs croaking among muscovites, and there is no need to be afraid of it and hide, and it is necessary to clearly state that only in the 18th century they stole our name, this is a country without history, without culture, this is a country without its origins, and we must put all this in the rank of law so that not only this is done step by step in the country, so that those who do not want it, and otherwise moscow moles, are responsible for the non-fulfillment of these norms we have a very clear course for the destruction and restoration of what is connected with communism today, officials should, after the adoption of this law, also be responsible for the fact that in our settlements

in public places in our information there were no false references in the space, what is the responsibility, starting with a fine and ending where there is treason, then there should also be responsibility as for treason, there will be bans, e-e, the installation of memorials to russian a-a individuals, natural persons, it is written as it will be determined who can a who can't, which, which , according to which principle, it is very important here that this is not the work of a few officials, it is very important that we involve scientists in this case , and secondly, that we involve public figures well, and of course, the representatives of the authorities, we will not have this repetition of medals when the president signed a decree awarding his friends tam koshovoy and kompashki, if it will

really be determined by people who have moral authority in society, i don't know if it was ideal, but i remember it very well i believe that poroshenko gave the penultimate decision or recommendation on awarding the title of hero of ukraine to an independent commission of moral authorities, and then during this period of time there were no real claims to those to whom the heroes of ukraine were awarded, that is, there were no such options. do you remember how under yanukovych medals were hung up and hung up? not only officials, because sometimes these are random people, they must be truly moral authorities who will never allow any attempts at corruption in this great and necessary matter, you are also

one of the initiators of this draft law. what is your opinion, what exactly is a russian measure, how is it correct to characterize it and why do we need to legislate and define such a concept ? peace is an ideology that dates back to the soviet period, where closed scientific and propaganda institutions worked in order to influence the subconscious of our citizens, because of this bill, the authors, as well as the main author mykola knyazhytskyi, took into account that the decision will be made

regarding the definition of this or that term , the body authorized by the state, if it concerns cultural heritage, then the decision will be delegated for adoption to the ministry of culture, where there are officials who are empowered by glory to exercise certain powers and for failure to fulfill those powers or for exceeding them, there is criminal liability if the language is relevant of specific settlements or territories and their definition is delegated to the ministry of regional policy, where the officials empowered by the state must carry out its powers. the time has come. the debate is still ongoing among the people's deputies, but the time has finally come to put an end to the actions, because after the victory of ukraine in this war against russia, we will have a period of

reconstruction, not only physical reconstruction, but also the reconstruction and restoration of the morality of ukrainianness , so that we all after all, they crossed out what was good and it led everything to such a war, and next we have to get rid of those terrible symbols of the soviet union, which are now permeated starting from textbooks on the history of geography, etc. where is everything imbued with these things, and ending with eh, i'm sorry, how today is the teaching of certain disciplines in higher educational institutions, where and ending with ordinary life, where there are also many soviet symbols that, unfortunately, nowadays turn into eh and have signs of the russian world

, a serious challenge after all will be for the residents of the eastern and er southern regions because the western part of our country is still more progressive and this is how it happened historically people had the opportunity to er leave to european western european countries a large part of people migrated after the first of the second wave and lives across the ocean, this is argentina, the rope and the world, so predict it, well, just look, they were exposed to greater influence, greater colonization, greater occupation, mental for 70 years and, in the end, these 30 years of independence, in fact, and so some regions assimilated themselves, associated themselves there as the russian world unfortunately, but i sincerely hope that the

bags of my relatives, for example, when they saw tanks driving down the street and kharkivska street, it was already clear what the russian measure is, it is tanks that shoot at civilians , it is military that shoots at civilians when you address your children, i would like everyone to remember this in russian, but this is a cultural front. it is very broad, and for a very long time we have had this russian yard stuck in our heads, and there are other points in the law about the media. points to discuss mr. olezhe, the verkhovna rada passed a new law on media in the first reading, but your colleagues, in particular, petrovych, sound the alarm, saying that there is a lot that can roll us back in this cultural de-occupation, the law was prepared long ago, since 2020 and now actually then as far as i understand your faction rather supported him than did not support him, what changed on tuesday it was such a black day of the ukrainian parliament because not only the law on the media, but also three bills on the

dbr, on excise and on the diversion of funds that are actually taken from the military for grand larceny, were adopted and moreover accepted, well , first of all, they were secretly accepted, because we have been trying to get broadcasts on the tv channel for a long time, no one wants to do it, and secondly , two groups voted for it, one group is the pro-government majority is the voice of the people and the second group is the former people of medvedchuk from the psg who have now scattered to different groups and who have now given themselves different names, that is, in essence, the government and the opzh pushed through these draft laws. what is so terrible about the media law? in my opinion, the country needs more. this is really one of the requirements of the european integration of ukraine, and really, when this law was written for a long time and there were several hundred pages,

we thought that this law would regulate absolutely any things and would not allow censorship or corruption in the information space of ukraine, but if the european commission sent its comments yesterday based on the results of this vote, then this is not a european integration law, it is, on the contrary, a draft law that will worsen the situation in the information space of ukraine. officials of the european union, but they will never object to this reduction of quotas for the presence of the ukrainian information space , in fact, the elimination of black lists when there were brought in muscovites who brought the muscovite contagion into the information space, in fact, the restoration of access of muscovites to the information space of ukraine is unacceptable, and it is very strange that on the last day before

the meeting, the profile committee, with a majority of servants of the people, despite the protests from mykola knyazhytskyi, volodya vyatrovych, sofia fedina still voted everything and tried to squeeze it all through the session hall because please tell me if the parliament made a decision a few months ago that the information space ukrainian radio and television should be free from russian-language products, this is the same decision. the decision was made by the majority. why is it not in this bill? why do they want to forget it? someone wants to return svativ again. they will not succeed because it is more than a law on media. it is a law on the security of ukraine, but you know it is so rotten. simply a worthless cherry on this whole cake that was presented in the parliament on tuesday was the decision in the first reading to take money from the military and transfer it to

big thefts that is again looting and they want to return corruption to the parliament, which existed until march 22nd, then in march 22nd, we made a decision, and this decision was unanimous, that the funds allocated to the road fund for the duration of the war should be taken from the road administration and transferred to the military and transferred to return for debt service for them that the war has already ended in a year, the war ended, they take this money from the military because they need to give it to someone in envelopes in the parliament, we must prevent this looting and this is not the business of deputies from of european solidarity of the homeland or from other democratic factions - this is a matter for every ukrainian today . every ukrainian must contact his or her majority representative. you will vote for it. you

will support it. we need a live broadcast here, we need a recorded broadcast of the parliament session, let people see what is really happening behind the scenes and what they want to hide from people, that's why we invite you now we can't watch the meeting of the council mykhailo tsimbalyuk has discovered what you see as a danger in the law about the media, it is necessary to read what is already written about quotas, whether there are any serious dangers for you, brothers, there is a non-euro bill and very well, european colleagues have noticed and prepared their positions. the next thing, in my opinion, is a very risky thing that is going to return to the

state media. and today we see that a single channel is being formed in the state. and this is already risky because a few years ago and the current law still gave preference to non-state mass media , this is a european approach, this is really a real competition, you know, the next risky thing is the return of part of the russian and russian showmen, i am not against the swats, this is family relations for many ukrainian families. and i am against the series matchmaker, which criticizes and primes everything ukrainian and shows that it is possible to have a different position that is close to russia. in addition, this bill and we are currently working on it can to improve it by making changes to the second

reading and this will be the way to ensure that this draft law is still european integration and supports the media; moreover, there is another danger regarding interference in electronic mass information via the internet and the granting of the authority of law enforcement agencies to monitor all of these means providing information, this already smells only of russia, and it is also impossible for belarus to allow this, and we are now activating those changes that can be improved in this bill, and we hope that the second do you remember mr. oleg, in the same way at the end of our conversation, your opponents also appeal to what we passed in the first reading because the european union requires it, and then by the

second reading we will work out what the risks are, why was it adopted in the first reading what will have to be done before the second reading of course we will work from these three weeks given today in order to submit amendments to the second reading, we will insist, but i would very much like our conversation today to attract attention the public of society to the point that the course of ukrainization and european integration, which is supported by the absolute majority of ends today, secretly want to break it and under good slogans under bravado phrases, but in fact such a very dangerous routine work is going on and the trailer for this is very simple, we need more light, more transparency, to see what is supported by the ukrainian world view thank you, what do you want to say about the digital stage? i am

convinced that this will be a real step towards european integration. we were in touch with you. we say goodbye to you, this morning was spent anna valevska ulyana panasiuk thank you for staying with espresso and supporting the ukrainian view of the world, if you have an allergy, the drug cetrin will help you breathe and get rid of itching in the eyes and tearing - cetrin specifically blocks histamine receptors and usually starts to protect against allergies after 20 minutes cetrin acted in the allergy center the goal will be in 25:20 i want to drive this fool out of our earth five three two three fire events the

most important events events that are just happening now and affect our lives, of course, the news feed reports about them, but there is little to know what is happening, you need to understand antin borkovskyi and invitation experts soberly evaluate events, analyze them by modeling our near future that saturdays at 1:00 p.m. with a repeat at 10 p.m. studio event with anton borkovskyi most espresso