it is possible to stop and stimulate such a process . i think you know it. there are many ways and tools to help this. therefore, mr. volodymyr, for this inclusion, i will remind you of volodymyr hryshko, diplomat, minister of foreign affairs of ukraine from 7-9 years old. and the extremely plenipotentiary ambassador of ukraine. well, we are moving on. well , i will remind you that the mission of the rich visited the zaporizhia nuclear power plant. raphael grosi left, but left five members of the mission at the gas station . will constantly represent the organization in the territory still occupied by the gas station, and conveyed to the mission trip the massive shelling of the energy supplier and the tales of russian propagandists about the ukrainian river landing, in any case, the full report of the mission will have to wait a bit, but so far the money reports on the obvious integrity of the military forces have been violated several times and this cannot continue and looks

at the mission report with skepticism. magat mykola shteinberg hex, head of the state committee on nuclear safety and ex-chief engineer of the emergency situations. he believes that the mission will see what wanted to see or what the occupiers allowed her to see, let's slightly increase the optimism of the mission, looks at mark zheleznyak, a scientist at the institute of environmental radioactivity of focus university. he is also the former chernobyl liquidator . with spent fuel that can be used to create dirty bombs in the focus of attention well, whether that attention was on those storage facilities is still an open question, we add it to our the conversations of hryhoriy plachkov, the ex-head of the state inspection of nuclear regulation mr. hryhoriy, we congratulate you glory to ukraine i congratulate you as a hero glory well, tell me, mr. hryhoriv, ​​what is your opinion ? we can talk about the effectiveness of this

mission and what it can really change in the situation . really difficult. and first of all, there are positive things that the mission did reach the zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant, so the money plan was two hours at the station and i have the opportunity to see what is happening there. yes, there is ispanochteinberg is really right in some questions and i agree with him, because at the last press conference mr. money showed all the factors and with two, for example, i have the first question - it is about the moral and psychological state of the personnel who are at the nuclear power station and secondly, regarding a-a hmm our control over nuclear

and radiation safety at gas stations e-e and i just really didn’t really understand in general e-e the conclusions of the mission, obviously they will be systematized into some kind of full-fledged large report, nevertheless i e -e not to at the end, i realize that i could see specifically the money of crimea, how to communicate with the russian representatives, on some of whom, let me remind you , ukraine has imposed e-e sanctions, but less so, the fact that representatives of the mission remain there at least until september 3, in the number of five people and may remain further one of them tentatively said to grigory. is it important from which countries these representatives are from, because we understand that russia insisted that the british , for example, were not there and the chinese were serbs? well , there were more offers and they were

accepted by the international agency for atomic energy , and specialists in the united states were removed from participation in the inspection, so the most important thing that the mission at the zaporizhia nuclear power plant should do is to check the development of nuclear material, because there is a lot of nuclear material at the nuclear power plant and in different forms, this is fresh nuclear fuel, this is spent nuclear fuel; secondly , the mission must verify the resource capacity of the zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant. will there be enough resources to it is safe to operate the zaporizhzhya nuclear power plant and we have seen footage that the physical protection at the gas station is equipment with the letters z, there are military equipment that would be present, there are heavy

equipment, therefore the risks of impenetrable situations at the zaporizhzhya nuclear power plant increase with each disconnected line and with each non-standard situation that is violated is happening at the zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant, tell me that. when did you see these russian specialists who convinced the experts directly on the cameras of god that i'm sorry there are no russian military here, there is no such thing here, there is complete security there, magic happens that projectiles at 180° somehow ballistically and there, in accordance with the law of physics, unfold uh in their own there in their own well there are a lot of questions well and the military well, i even look at these shots well , a military man with a st. george ribbon is standing on

the ground in the first or second mazashli behind him, there is no power station. well, this is a violation of everything that we, what was possible was violated, well, right here, the question of the nation is not only in the ground, by its very presence of the military, it seems to me that the most important thing is how real the danger of such an accident is, that is, not even artificially organized, but due to negligence and everything else, and today the scenario is like this, well, there are many experts who say that the scenario there is more like the chernobyl scenario of 1986 and others say the scenario that took place in 2011 at the japanese focusima station, but look at it even from an economic point of view, even these events led

to such consequences that and and and that it is then to compensate, it is even more consequences, so, well, this is this is the situation that is happening at the zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant, it is terrible and that is why there is a reaction, but my advice is to wait for the final report and then we will criticize it there or agree with it . this year, in general, so and uh, how do you feel? in general , i agree with you about this idea in the expert environment, there is such a discussion

regarding a safer state in operation m-m of the zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant, we know that there is a statement by the state department of the united states that it is safer for nuclear power units to be in a cold shutdown and in a column state . that the nuclear power plant should be transferred to a state where there is more time for the operating personnel to react to those non-project events that may happen at the zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant, well, this is my personal opinion and

the dispute is all well, no, there is no discussion of this issue , it is, after all, in the expert environment. okay , the cold reserve ukraine can of course do this, but does this mean that the russian federation will not be able to start the reactors again, and actually not increase the degree of danger around after all, again, the cold reserve - these are the same risks, and actively working reactors is a completely different story. to admit an operator for important technical changes at a nuclear power unit, these people have been

preparing for 8 to 10 years, and even if mr. noted the money - these are very high professional people, and as an example, take from the rostov nuclear power plant or another nuclear power plant from the russian federation, bring operational personnel to put him on block control board and everything will work so it doesn't work that's why the staff really arrives does heroic actions and he is very high professional and therefore start or switch the nuclear power plant to e or to crimea or to the united power grid of the russian federation, it is currently very difficult from a technical point of view, from the actions of our military and special services of ukraine, it seems

five if i am not mistaken about the last one from the last press conference of mr. grosius he said that he left six inspectors at the zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant and it is planned that two inspectors will remain on a permanent basis and this is really important opinion, this is important, but still there is a statement from 42 countries after the conference on the non-proliferation of nuclear weapons, which requires the russian federation

to return the zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant to the technical and legal control of ukraine, and it is also important, in my opinion, that the mgt mission is one of the first steps will give an opportunity will give an opportunity to other international states and other powerful states to influence the russian federation powerfully to influence the russian federation regarding the de-occupation and demilitarization of the zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant what are we going to thank mr. hryhoriy hryhoriy plachkov oleg the head of the state inspection of nuclear regulation was in touch with us about the results of the megate mission at the zaporizhia nuclear power plant p vitaliy well, there are still some representatives there, a lot, well, it is at least somehow to protect zs from of direct shelling of the russians for the near future, while they are there, they will run the risk of rummaging through the gas station, it is completely different that

they will of course er and exist in er such realities and try to make these inspectors agate look at some facts, you know the ukrainian shelling of ukrainians, some destabilizing actions , why do the inspectors megate the russians at the radio station at the nuclear power plant, which they occupy, to legitimize their testimony about the fact that it is ukraine that is undermining the stability of the zs, but they say this all the time and no one he does not believe them. and if many representatives say this, it will be a completely different situation. well, you see. this is how we understand that russia is buying ukrainian territories, occupying the zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant, but ukrainians they should also be more careful. maybe they

will try to use it to create some provocations, falsify some information, some military data. oh, you don't want to come and walk here on the territory, oh, you see the ukrainian shelling, you see this, this is the shelling, and this is the blue-yellow flag, well, on the other hand, look at the money so careful with the wording, so careful will any representatives of megathes have the courage to speak in advance, but where did this or that projectile come from, they are there purely for security reasons of an atomic nuclear facility, is it true, can they make any conclusions about the military component of this situation that someone is shelling the station, it affects its security they have to say who shelled it. we have such a problem, who is cutting the hair , i don't know. well, if the inspector is there at least he can already see with his own eyes who is firing, he must see this question where it is already good

but it is interesting that what does it really look like inspector magadan, he is no longer just looking at the object he says that as a result of such and such actions, the object is damaged. well, then the question arises as to what kind of what it was, i honestly don't know how far it is possible to talk about the fact that the inspector cannot share his conclusions about what affected the safety of the zaporizhzhia phone, i would say no what was affected. and on whose side it is so so, that is, i can't say about it, they can't say who exactly fired. well, because, excuse me, the range of the projectiles is not visible with the eye, and i think that the representative of the store cannot draw conclusions then but but from the other side, from which side did you fly, it is clear that there are russians here, ukrainians are absolutely there and they will draw conclusions, uh, we are moving on, and probably the most important thing this week is, i would

say, the scaling up of counteroffensive actions in the south of our country, because literally 29- on august 1st, the operational command of the south, then the general staff, informed us that the first line of enemy defense in the kherson region had been breached in several places, and the armed forces of ukraine were improving their positions. information vacuum, they asked for a minimum of analysis, a minimum of coverage of information, and please do not try to do something among your military acquaintances, the ukrainians ran to look for information , of course, to the russians, they have their own truth, in any case, we respect the topics that the military and political leadership of our country asks us to discuss but at the same time, we are aware of the risks involved. the counteroffensive is more large-scale, and the number of dead and a large number of wounded is greater. i would like to outline now in general

the situation in the south of our country and with roman kostenko, people's deputy, secretary of the verkhovna rada committee on national security and defense intelligence, colonel of the security service of ukraine, we congratulate roman, glory to ukraine, congratulations studio, glory to the heroes, we will not ask what exactly is happening, what is the situation in the south, the operational command, the south, let us be careful reports everything that can be reported, but the countless number of explosions at warehouses with ammunition of the enemy, logistics nodes under constant attack, headquarters personnel simply cannot be counted, but our american friends still uh well, let's say that they are cooling the ardor of ukrainian society in particular and say that this is a complex story and a multi-track story, don't expect instantaneous results and decisions , it is possible that what is happening now is still the stage of preparation for the counter offensive

please respond to this. well, i think that even those who take part in active actions would like it to be, uh, much faster to advance, yes , active actions are indeed taking place now, but the question is that uh the situation is quite difficult we understand who we are fighting against and even if we talk about this right-wing right-bank bridgehead i would say uh you know a bigger opportunity for russia politically for russia which has not received any victory well victory if it is uh for the country which started the war which encroached on our one of the largest countries in europe and, let's say, is now holding on to one de facto regional center that it can name yes . even donbass and luhansk donbass could not fully reach the borders. therefore, they need a specific victory, therefore, to keep this right-wing plan

is, from my point of view, a political decision of the leadership of the russian federation in order not to lose the authority that they believe they have left, at least in the middle of the country, because from a military point of view, for the russians, the situation here is difficult for it is difficult for us, but we know how to react to it, it is difficult for them from the point of view of logistics and they are constantly under the constant influence of artillery and missiles, therefore the situation is also difficult for them and if our american partners say that it won't be fast. i think it depends on many factors. if we do everything right, it won't be long enough . talking about the right bank tax, about the right bank, we are talking about the political importance of this bridgehead for russia. can we talk about that ? that in fact

it will be at least difficult for the russians to get out of there on a large scale, today they just talked to natalia humenyuk and she notes that if they start to get out, it is better to do it right now because it will be slow and subtle such a string process will not work otherwise, in fact, the withdrawal will also be organized, there is such a military uniform and methods. they can also organize themselves, and we saw how well they organized the withdrawal in the kyiv direction. when they needed cover units, there were units that directly withdrew with normal command, it is possible to do whether there will be anywhere to retreat, this is already a question for our armed forces for our khamerkhs for our for our e-e systems that can impress many people know he says, what is necessary to take kherson so that they will take care of the amulet, what i see on the maps

is not what i see, based on the position i am in now, it is necessary to approach, well, 10 well, a maximum of 15 km further into the depth of this bridgehead if it is shortened and taken under control already artillery, not rocket artillery, these are two directions plus well, there the entire riverbed is under the control of the dnieper and everything, then the enemy does not have the opportunity to build crossings and use what is left and they are already completely under 100% influence of this this is what needs to be taken, and when they talk about the battle for kherson, eh, they can really get stuck there, but with the loss of logistical routes, the battle for kherson may not take place, because they are simply eh, they will need to flee from there, so for us, it is profitable eh this is the operational situation. what is the current situation? many troops, but having done everything right, and i think that our uh, our command will do this very

hard . the enemy caught on the right the coast and for us it is like such a ghoul in the entire er almost er front line we need to knock them out in order to secure ourselves in the future our entire south for sure romane good part of the right bank definitely let's consider the best option for the development of events the enemy is not here anymore but together with that, what should the armed forces of ukraine do next? well , once again, theoretically, you understand how the map of hostilities now looks like, after all, the logistical routes, which are now located in the occupied territory and will already be damaged. are these necessary? ways for us for our offensive actions in the future is possible. i think that now if we talk about leaving

the bridges or not leaving now from the point of view that has developed more i would say that they need to be destroyed because they threaten this south because once again i will repeat the enemy the right bank no longer has its bridgeheads, and we have on the left bank groups and troops and directions in which we can develop our e-e well, if it is necessary to attack or hold the defense, then from the point of view of now, how are they happening to the enemy the enemy needs them more than us, that's why they really need to be destroyed now, and then you can use this direction as a secondary one with the help of pantons, what the enemy is doing, yes, again, we are doing therapy with you , i, as a military person, graduated from the military academy there, i'm just saying that it's not for us it is critical to lose these bridges and it will be critical to have them and to give the enemy the opportunity to advance further south, this is critical for us. and tell me

clearly in principle that if the ukrainian armed forces are entrenched on one bank of the dnieper, the russians are anchored on the opposite route and the lack of bridges by the way, this fact helps to anchor, especially since they are not cut off from crimea, and to crimea through other bridges weapons go, soldiers go, and it seems to me that control over this bank of the dnieper is very important for crimea, because nova kakhovka is there there is water for crimea, it seems to me that it is even more important for them than kherson, we are talking, you know , looking at strategic things, i understand what you are saying, but the issue needs to be resolved gradually , at the moment, this threat is a threat to liquidate yes to go ashore to consolidate and then already the positions there in zaporizhzhia, kyiv oblast, from the opposition,

the bridgehead on the left bank of the dnieper, it is necessary to prepare further liberation, now it is necessary to eliminate the threat of shelling of mykolaiv, liberate kherson and in general, their advancement in the south, because this is still strategically important well, from a strategic point of view, water is really important. i believe that only later we will be in the future, if we establish ourselves on the left bank on the right bank, we will completely take control and drive it out from this territory, we will be able to release part of the power of the means that are now here and are involved in those active actions, to build a defense and activate other directions, after all, when we talk about the fact that there is such a strategy of strikes, they say that in different places, they say that in different places, and it in one direction and on the second and on the third and on the fourth, this means, in principle, that such a strategy

ends with one big blow. can it be long? it is not a fact to continue like this . look, i think that this strategy is exactly what it is. an attack is, first of all, conducting reconnaissance with the aim of identifying weak points where it is possible to strike, plus this is a constant transfer of forces and resources in order to confuse the enemy in the number of the enemy and so that he does not know where the real blow will be, the real one, well, that er, military science is not straightforward there, yes. here you have to understand that er, there is a lot of er, what is going on. for example, what people do not understand, but er, we will say answering your question. it is not necessary that if there are small there will definitely be blows big, but well, i would like it to be, because small blows can lead to the understanding that we cannot hit us anywhere now, for example, we do not have the strength of the means and we need to stand on the defensive, but

the initiative must be taken, and i have already said for a long time that i now see this very it is correct when we impose on the enemy and what is happening in the south is exactly that and there are uh its uh how to conduct hostilities and they have to react to it because until this six months we practically reacted to them and it was not effective enough we just stood idly by it's happening now. i won't say that you won't be there, as they say, as you said, talk a lot about it, but i hope that we will develop what we started. you can say that on september 11, which referred to the accession of ukrainian regions to russia, will not happen. what do you think? well, in principle today is the second one. and what is it , or is it wrong, because you are not holding a referendum where there is fighting 15 km from you and in

fact it is not the donetsk and luhansk regions of the 13th year, you have people with whom you want to hold a referendum even if you i really wanted that there the times of the internet are waiting for liberation, they are not waiting there for you to hold a referendum, so i think it is unreal, but the russian federation is nothing unreal for her, we know how elections are held in russia, so they do not need voters for their elections. and this is a fact of her novel, she remains literally just a few more moments and i would still like to understand that when there is a war, in principle it is, as you know, the flap of a butterfly's wings and a chain reaction begins, we understand that the situation in the south should have correlated anyway in some way, the situation, for example, in the east, maybe the raisin direction, uh, in your opinion, have there been certain changes besides the initiative. as i understand from your statements, what

will happen, well, in the east, is on our side now. i think that the basis is the local means that we possess we cannot afford, for example, to carry out active actions in the direction there 2-3 or more, and well, these are the realities of the war that we have, so we will conduct them where they are simply, well, again, i do not say what the means are here, maybe they are bigger in the east and the main blow will be there, this is already a decision based on the decision of the military leadership. but i will say one thing, when you watch from a quadcopter when, not on the first of september, but on the second of september, he climbs out of the second floor of the liberated school, is afraid and waves the ukrainian flag, then i will say even tears well up in a colonel like me, that's why we support our armed forces and believe in them and everything will be fine thank you thank you for your work and

your service for this inclusion roman kostenko people's deputy of ukraine secretary of the committee of the verkhovna rada on matters of national security, defense and intelligence, a colonel of the security service of ukraine, a person who is currently dealing with the ukrainian rooster well, we will probably take a short break , true, and continue. literally in a few minutes, the goal will be in 25 20 20 15 i want to drive this scumbag out of our land 5 3 2 fire wild creatures hunt washing machines and we are from ukraine and insure our machines online at hotline-finance

hotline finance