somewhere in march and april, a month when there was a de facto very high probability that putin would use tactical nuclear weapons for which the united states of america, not only the united states of america and britain, gave an unequivocal signal that as soon as tactical nuclear weapons would be used and what not for defensive purposes, in the first place, it was probably not used by the aggressor country, the weapon was precisely for offensive purposes, so that it contradicts any of these words, and in principle, it contradicts even the doctrine written in russia, so if it will be done, then they will get putin even at a depth of 2 km in that famous bunker to which he can be evacuated and after that this rhetoric went to the spa look even at the

speeches of the same putin now it is a different story that is, it is a story that was involved even when the russians entered chernobyl, do you remember now it continues at the zaporizhzhya npp, that is, the de facto element of blackmail is present, but as the last days show, even this element of blackmail is no longer perceived by the world as real also because even this delegation that came to win back and that testified to some moments , uh, in public, means a rocket that flew from the wrong side and which, as explained by the russian, i don’t know who he is there, who showed that before the very fall, it turned 180° . well, in particular, this, but i think that there will be a lot more in the certificates that the city did not show, uh, after all, there are still two

observers who will go to the zaporizhzhia npp, and for some reason i think that in this case they will not be able to hide some radioactive cloud if they there they will provoke that er well, i can't fully guarantee now, but for 90%, or 95%, that zaporizhzhia sf will be fine, everything will be fine there and er, this will be exclusively the story of yet another collapse of such er blackmail what to what the train succeeds in him . by the way, there are very few real such elements left for blackmail. of course, he is now more involved in freezing europe, as they say in their publications, and i think that it is just the energy mm. so, what is this weapon for ? by the way,

the event has already ceased to be held and well, probably not on west and if we talk there in general and a lot of countries have stopped behaving there, some still allow themselves similar things but nevertheless i think that even this blackmail er winter blackmail it will not pass either and what elements of new blackmail do you have i mean, what do you need to prepare for? what i'm watching right now is russia in the movies, a lot of money, a lot of lobbyists are currently traveling around europe and, de facto, they are now working very hard in the information field. we need it in the country. now emphasize precisely on in the information field, because on the one hand , there is an understanding of what

is happening in ukraine at the state level, on the other hand, in society , it still feels like this, well, i won't say what it is, that it is fatigue, but you know that it leaves the front pages of newspapers or something uh, from the first news, ukraine, and this means that society is beginning to be less interested in what is happening in ukraine, now it is necessary to strengthen it, and i think that well, i really hope that the ukrainian authorities will try harder to do this now. that is, we need to throw in europe, as well as its own people, so that they tell the truth. of course, money is being thrown in crazy now, well, this even applies to the american changes, we now see that periodically even in respectable publications, there are articles that carry a frankly russian narrative and we are quite worried because, as i have already said, russian money works very hard, and in

this case, there is the visa issue, which is now starting to shift in order to prevent these lobbyists from entering europe they to me it seems that it will be a plus, because the fewer of them there will be mined, the better, but let's hope that as soon as possible we will do our work in europe, and there will be no such people there at all. victor, thank you for participating in the sweet program during the war . thank you for the fake ones. professional answers well, i will remind our viewers that i was in touch with the head of the board of the institute of world politics, viktor shlinchak. i was told that the second guest is also in touch with me. i am ready to introduce him - this is oleksandr khara, an expert on foreign affairs and of the security policy of the center of defense strategies . i greet you, mr. oleksandr. good day, mr. yury . thank you for joining. thank you, and it is always a pleasure

to communicate with you and all your guests, mr. oleksandr. but in the last week i have heard very often about the fact that it is almost doomed to go to war with russia, and how serious do you think all this is? well, i think that despite the madness that the kremlin is planning and they almost won in nazism was destroyed here in ukraine, and yet another thing is definitely that the military are definitely not idiots and understand that if ukraine could not be dealt with by conventional methods, then the conflict may involve the use of nuclear weapons like the europeans, and in europe there is also france and britain, which can respond. regardless of washington, by and large, there are five

countries that have american nuclear weapons on their territory, and that is why what is called neutral nuclear power in the program can be used in the event of a conflict with nato. i have already i am not talking about the united states. that is, this is the kind of madness that actually hardly even some hard-headed russian generals would like to see. it is another matter to frighten. it is another matter to frighten with nuclear weapons by placing them, for example, on the territory of belarus . in northern and western europe, by and large, it is also certainly possible to be intimidated by the fact that the continuation of the supply or some new types of weapons that our western partners can transfer to us will be such a red line that the bear alcoholic constantly writes about it in his

telegram, which means that he scares with the conflict directly with the sign, that is, you know all this, the moska teaches an elephant. you still don't consider the russians as idiots as the russian military leadership, even after what they did on february 24, when there were 20 on the 28th, they were already supposed to be at the parade in kyiv . those who say that of course that it was idiocy in general and even the hardliners are so soviet, i don't remember the general's last name. he said that it should not be done, but there are others who believed that they were not informed, that the plans were not developed, that there was an idea that ukraine does not exist, it is easy to do to take it and since all this was prepared there by the fifth service of the fsb, and that's why they simply say that all these failures of the military, what they are, are not

because the russian army is a dummy analogue of the netov weapon, it is not that powerful, but because it was not prepared, because from the very beginning they didn't go hard. i really don't know. after mariupol , volnovakha and kharkov, as we see every day, what does it mean to be tough? well, they are not capable of doing anything tough by a large margin, but in their minds , uh, they think that it could be different if they prepared, if they the top management did not make a mistake and did not rely on all these secret service agents . now let's talk about something else . territories of the member states of the european union, and only if the process of issuing these schengen visas to the russians is complicated, that is, now they will be a little more expensive, it seems that there were 40 euros, now it will be

80, there will be a much longer process of waiting for the result and something else how do you comment on such a decision, such a political decision, well, first of all , i agree with dmytro kuleb, who called it a half-step on a half-back, of course, they are like that for me. example the germans expressed some regrets there and said that he did not bring peace to europe, freedom to certain peoples, yes, and definitely something - to the non-germans, the unification of germany on fairly good terms, let's say yes and definitely that they have right, but unfortunately they ignore the experience of central and eastern europe of the former soviets, that is, the colonies of the soviet union, moscow, or rather

, the warsaw pact, and actually this is the key point, the baltics and the poles, well, above all, the baltics and even the fimi say that this is a threat russian tourists should not wander around europe when their troops are killing ukrainians, which means that western europe is old europe, the french and germans say no , we are not supporters of the transformational role of these troops, because russians come to europe, look at freedom, democracy and return, and try to implement it there and they actually ignore their own empirical experience that for 30 years the russian federation was welcomed in various formats, including by citizens who traveled to europe, but for some reason we actually see a fascist state where a small layer of russians actually stand up or do they even have the courage to somehow master this

fascist and genocidal war. and by and large, somewhere around 76% of russians support this so-called special military operation . the study of the lion to the center was made public just a couple of days ago, and more than half of russians are happy because it is a matter of pride, and the operation of the russian military in ukraine is evoked. what kind of transformational the role of which, let's say, the possibility that the russians will come to mif and bring democracy can be said if they are, in principle, unable to cope even with the fact that they are actually being tortured , killed and deprived of the remnants of freedom and rights, therefore, of course, these are polymers, of course let 's say the ball is now in the balkis' court, the estonians have already said that there are two possibilities for them to

completely block the exit of the russians, because i want to remind our viewers that after a large-scale attack by russia to ukraine and the european union closed its airspace and now the russians can reach the free world by land through finland and the baltic states. % of russians who traveled to leonidas in these territories, if the prices have already been reduced by 10% , russia can, in principle, go further , because they are also perceived as a threat to national security. if all these efforts of the germans and the french will take a step to soften or moderate this dust, it means the baltics, they will simply move and we will see that there

is no common understanding in europe of the threats from the russians a-a and that is exactly why every country will act at its own discretion, and this is bad, by the way, in fact, it would be much better if they beat a simple thing, which by the way, the baltics from the very beginning proposed a complete ban on tourist trips for russians. meanwhile, uh, simplify the procedure for humanitarian visas for those who are persecuted and health, freedom and whose lives are threatened by the fsb there or at all by putin's regime, journalists and students there , anyone can travel and go to europe . let's say a more simplified procedure, it seems to me that it would be more humane and more correct. i completely agree with you and in continuation of what you said about the baltic countries, and i suggest that we all listen now to a quote by the minister of foreign affairs of estonia, urmas rein salo, let's listen, let's see, listen, russia is committing

genocide in ukraine, so it is morally unacceptable that that there are no restrictions on entry into the eu for citizens of the aggressor country. we must give a clear signal that the responsibility for the war lies not only with russian soldiers, but also with russian society. the restraint of ordinary russians allows crimes to be committed on ukrainian soil. this is what he says in poland, unfortunately they continue to emphasize again and again that this is a war of difficult russians and putin's war in germany in france yesterday even the coordinator of strategic of communications of the national security council of the white house, john kerbet also said this in an interview with the russian tv channel dosh. well, i'm telling you honestly, i personally didn't think that in washington they follow this as well, despite the fact that they give us weapons , support us, help us. well, but we see that

as you said, we can see what they think about this in estonia, just as you said in latvia, lithuania , finland, poland, well, thank you, for their position, it helps us, yes, please tell me, mr. oleksandr, i am now asking our director to show i apologize for showing the graphics of this week's edition of politico, and it came out with an article called "russia can be a trojan horse." by the country of hungary, i mean petr siyar, considering the fact that at the funeral of gorbachev in moscow, western leaders were present, only prime minister

viktor orban was present. and taking into account the fact that they signed a new gas agreement with russia there for the supply of gas and gas and many, many other things, can this be true, well , of course it is, because on the one hand there is economic and, above all, energy dependence and we we remember that when the decision was made by the european union to reduce its dependence on russian energy sources, primarily oil, and because it is absolutely clear that this russian infrastructure was originally soviet, now it is russian, 90% of it is aimed at western europe and it is quite difficult for europeans to switch to alternative sources of energy supplies now, because lg terminals need to be built, interconnectors need to be built, for example, what should happen between bulgaria and greece on october 1, of course, this is all a complicated and long process, so hungary was excluded from the list of countries that have fast

to get rid of russian oil and gas, taking into account its geographical position, in fact, it is such an island on the continent that is extremely dependent on russia, and the second part is unconditionally political, since this regime that currently exists in hungary is authoritarian by all indications . and we see how at one time during the cold war, or rather at the beginning of the soviet union, there was this communist international that united these communists and the idea of ​​a world revolution so now there is, one might say, such a conservative, far-right or authoritarian international that unites russia, china, iran, which means that hungary definitely feels very good there. similarly, serbia is trying to play a small russia in the balkans. that's why it is. well, and of course, there are historical and political things that are exploited by all the politicians there in serbia, the

great serbia, i remember russia, the empire. well, hungary would also like to see parts of the territory of other states in their wet dreams. what is it? the destructive role of this state has been blocking our approach to nato for a long time. even before the war, a decision was made and they actually passed a law on, on the one hand , simplifying nato access to the territory of hungary. of course, hungary is not capable of repelling any external threats on its own, but on the other hand, in the same law, there was actually a ban on the transfer of any weapons to help ukraine and its territory , and that is why it is really such a trojan horse that must behave not very consolidated and he doesn't really look at the security concerns

of other eu members in a perebroshenata and actually in the eu if we are talking about energy and other security. and that 's actually why it can be considered such a trojan horse next to us. well, it's a pity because i i just looked and they said that next to us in the immediate vicinity we have a border with this trojan horse well, unfortunately well, but we hope that the leadership of this country will have the wisdom not to take any other such, well, bad steps uh-uh and can you please explain to mr. oleksandr the position of germany and with the supply of weapons to us, i am personally very interested in understanding it because it is in chronological order, first german chancellor olafsholtz says that germany almost woke up did not wake up from sleep everything is clear ukraine we will continue to support to give her weapons then the minister of defense of the country kristina lamberg said, but oh, we will not be able to help ukraine very much with weapons and we will not give much because the warehouses of the bundeswehr are almost

empty . to the military committee, he says that he doesn't talk about that, they talk about the fact that we have weapons, we should give them to ukrainians and ukrainians because the ukrainians protect us and the truth is, unfortunately, in ukraine, you can somehow do all this sum up and explain what berlin actually thinks and does. well, let's start with the fact that there was a radical change in germany's position, and the number of democrats, which chancellor is there now compared to the previous ones. well, i'm not talking about 30 years ago. i'm not in general, it should be said since the soviet times, since the cold war, because the socialists, of course, they were always like that about the moscow ones, they were very mild in criticizing any government in the administration there or, well, even more so in washington for their tough position in relation to moscow, so you can

to say a radical change was the second moment, i mean the condemnation of moscow and the support of ukraine and the provision of e-weapons to us plus the decision to allocate 100 billion euros in order to bring the bundeswehr to its senses. because in fact the largest economy in europe is one of the largest suppliers of weapons in the world in for sure, germany is included, they are not capable of fighting and cannot ensure their own security , but not taking advantage of the security of the baltic states, for which they feel some kind of responsibility, that is, there is such a moment, but on the other hand, of course, there are also old attitudes that russia is great. we have a fault with them because we did very badly there during the second world war and it is better not to be hostile to trade and all these, you know, such constructs and mental structures that block skazhem yes, the understanding that russia is completely different, that it is an exam threat not only to

ukraine, but in this free world, this is definitely a big problem, but for me, it was an explanation of why this is the position of the chancellor or, for example, the minister of foreign affairs from another party and she from the very beginning was quite pro-ukrainian, let's say, and pushed the government to give us weapons and powerful weapons, hmm, well, actually, she is trying to lobby this now, so now there is an adviser, one of the key advisers of the foreign flights, e.e., an ambassador who moved from i respect mr. steimayer, but about a month ago , his interview was quite extensive, and where he told the journalists, you are not asking me about why we provide ukraine with the weapons they are asking for, but about how we will build our relations with by the russian federation after the end of the war, in fact, this caution of trying to somehow keep to the middle line, and in this conflict between ukraine

and russia or the free world and russia, there cannot be a middle ground, this will mean, you know, not being the opposite of evil means being together, being an accomplice with this evil, germany is actually doing these mistakes and she will pay even within the framework of her senate for these mistakes. what am i talking about ? they definitely understand that germany is not a reliable partner in the event of a conflict with the russian federation, so they rely more and more on the united states. well, if we are talking about poland, recently poland signed an insanely large contract for the supply of weapons with south korea, although it seems that germany is close here and without the condition that german weapons are of very high quality, it is a matter of time, it is very important, of course, that it is necessary to strengthen the fighting capacity of poland, especially since they

transferred a large amount of weapons to us, and secondly, they do not want to be dependent from such partners who will say no, we will not supply you with ammunition there or any components because you are a belligerent state. by the way, the whole scandal with mr. macron's statements to french diplomats, where he said that france should not follow the ocimingers, that is, what -e are inciting to war and definitely meant poland and the baltic states, and therefore definitely that poland will simply try to ensure its security in a minimal way, involving germany in this, in fact, these are the results and the most powerful issues germany will be viewed more skeptically, it is definitely now losing its leadership position in the political sense, i also didn't want it to be like that, oleksandr, i have one more question for you, we only have one minute before the end of the broadcast, please, but i really want to put it, eh, the united states

the americans said that they would not issue an entry visa for sergey lavrov, the minister of defense, or the minister of foreign affairs of russia, and his associates, who were going to go to the meeting of the general assembly in new york. tell me. please, it seems to me because in russia everyone cries on the air, in russia everyone is hysterical, according to you, it was, well, it wasn’t a blow below the belt, but it was effective. well, i think so. although i didn’t see that they finally refused, they just don’t give it yet visas for a large delegation, but on the other hand, why would lavrov lean across the ocean so that he would tell the lighthouse that there are theses about the nazis there, or the security operation, something else, as if he had taken up, he can lie there, he is in new york, he is enjoying this foreign city , so why is lavrovke there at all, i don’t i understand he can't bring anyone constructive. so why are they all there? i agree with you , oleksandr. thank you very much for participating in the program "the world

during the war . " time is pushing us, this means that we are forced to say goodbye to you until next monday. but before saying goodbye for real, i want to remind you that those who are currently watching our program on youtube should like those who watch later, also like if you like the program, don't like it, don't like it, at least i would like to do the opposite well, comment because it's important for us and for the promotion of our program well , see you next monday, my name is yuriy fizer,

help me find 17 -year-old maksym yaitskyi, the boy disappeared in the city of rubizhne, luhansk region . currently, rubizhne is under occupation and is almost completely destroyed. it is known that maksym went missing at a time when heavy hostilities were taking place in the city the guy was last contacted on the fifth of april, and since that day nothing is known about his fate and where he is now, but it is possible that maxim is still in the border and there is simply no way to make himself known. it is clear that they do not broadcast in the occupied territories ukrainian television, but i still hope that, at least on the internet, this program will be seen in rubizhne, and first of all, i am appealing to the residents of the city of rubizhne with a request to help in the search. please look carefully at maksym's photo. he is 17 years old. he looks thin for his age, he has gray eyes, of course, the bright color of the boy's hair immediately attracts attention, so it will be difficult not to recognize him, but on the other hand, it may also be that he now

has a different hairstyle and the actual color of his hair, so once again, i very much ask you to look at maxim's face, if you know any information about him or where he might be now, please contact us immediately on the hotline at 116 000 000. calls to the child tracing service are free and you can call from any mobile operator as well write to the chatbot of the children's search service in telegram . by the way, it was recently possible to find danya the coachman and his work in the border station. for quite a long time , almost nothing was known about the children. they made themselves known and it turned out that there are very strong problems with mobile communication in the foreign station and it is usually impossible to make a call or access the internet at all, so it is really not excluded that maksym yaitsky is still in the foreign station and also cannot notify about himself due to problems with his mobile phone

contact however, of course, this is only a version and in fact maxim can be anywhere in ukraine or even abroad, so i hope for your attentiveness and concern and once again ask you to inform us of any information about maxim on our free hotline 116 000 000 or write to the chat bot of the child search service in telegram . also, the 16-year-old sisters yana and diana komarovskyi disappeared in the occupied territory of mariupol. their sister alina turned to us for help in the search. they are all always together in the city, girls. beautiful girls are very smart. on april 2, the russians began shelling and bombing the area where the girls lived , and it was on this day that they finally managed to get in touch with their sister. on the second of april, we got in touch with them.