time, they function using russian fuel, and there is an additional technological point of how technologically it is possible quickly, for example , to try to convert one or another nuclear plant. stengal restarted the production of fuel for small vvr 440 reactors. we have two of these for the first and second rozhensky blocks. there is fuel and that's what the president of energoatom okhotyn said in the spring that we will not buy fuel from russia, but for starters, at least we need to terminate the contract with due to force majeure, i have not heard about it yet, the inter-governmental agreements between

ukraine and the russian federation on cooperation in the scientific and technical economic sphere of nuclear energy остановлены только в августе этого года пролось what additional contracts are possible? well, we just don't know very well all this legislative commercial corpus in our variators vr-440 это тоже i don't know in which the state of confidentiality contracts and nothing, sometimes it’s not the same if the fuel was destroyed. i think they would be the first message about it, but i haven’t seen such reports in the media yet. well, if, for example, the rest of the nuclear power plants are transferred , you said 50 to 50, that is well, the technological point for installing american fuel there

is well, there is a quick thing in the fact that the blocks when the use of fuel and stengas are started, they are mixed zones, so-called where russian fuel and american fuel are gradually after every year of reboots, american assemblies are added, so you won't do it in one moment. let's hope that it will be done as soon as possible, because we understand that our paths with the russian federation have parted forever. thank you very much for this brilliant, honest analysis on the air of the tv channel espresso olga kosharna nuclear energy expert worked on our live broadcast and we

are walking in austria from the 14th to the 21st year mr. oleksandr, we congratulate you glory to ukraine if there connection, he is like a hero, glory, i hear you. ok , let's start with the topic of what reuters has been telling us about since september 5. during a press conference, american president joseph biden said that russia should not be identified as a state sponsor of terrorism . that in the white house, biden was asked whether russia should be considered a state sponsor of terrorism, to which he briefly answered no, and ukraine has been insisting and lobbying for several months, so to speak, for the united states to recognize russia, which launched a full-scale invasion it is such a country and some american officials really support kyiv in this matter. it didn’t stick here, you can recall mr. antony blinken a-a hmm, actually we understand that there are supporters of this

opinion and this decision in the united states, nevertheless, uh-uh, in the end, the president of america decides do n't do this don't resort to such recognition what is the reason mr. oleksandr and why is it important please see the recognition of russia as a state sponsor of terrorism is essentially transferring russia to the same category as iran and north korea is a very, very, such a step, which in fact takes russia out of a stable, uh, for years, if not decades, in the brackets of the political, diplomatic, economic process in the world, uh, and we see that biden, as a cautious person, somehow drags it along. i don't think that this possibility

is completely rejected, but so far they are not ready for this step, we will see how it goes . reported that the usa is no longer afraid that at least military aid to ukraine will provoke the russian federation, that is, here we see a tectonic break has happened, and in the end they will support us in all available ways, but for some reason , in the context of recognizing the country as a sponsor of terrorism , there is still no reason for such a gap between a military component and there a diplomatic sanction as a result of the fact that this is, in fact, like the antonov bridge, you will destroy it and if

there is no way back, there is no longer even er. this is a very decisive step, it is a very large-scale step, that is, to supply arms to ukraine is already, well, it’s one thing to talk there, you use tough er rhetoric is one thing, but in fact, not to leave a chance for er diplomatic contacts er from moscow with russia is already a completely different level of courage er unfortunately, we see, we see that the west is studying in ukraine all these six months, and he is learning simple

things of courage. there, reach out a hand, er, introduce another reboot, er, and solve all the problems, now , i understand, realized that with russia, er, it doesn’t work, it doesn’t work, and maybe the next step is practical implementation, after all, sanctions are permissible , er, russia, the country is a sponsor terrorism , russia's economic ties with india and china are closer now than with the rest of the world, so to speak if they continue economic relations with the russian federation. and we understand that the united states and china, although rhetorically, they

are in a confrontation. i would like to believe that they are not trying to escalate and transfer these conflicts to other planes. the truth is, you see, in biden , he really is a person who came to the white house as the vice president as obama's deputy, the deputy of the president, who ends wars and does not start them, and probably somewhere inside, this is the mindset of a peacemaker, the mindset of a person who, with all his efforts, avoids escalation, it remained somewhere in him and in including, you are correct in saying that if russia is recognized as a sponsor of terrorism, this basically means mandatory sanctions not only against russia, but also against those who closely cooperate

with russia, but again, it is my belief that this is an economic component in this the issue is not the key right now. it seems to me that biden and the united states white house feel that, uh, now, uh, ukraine is moving into a counteroffensive now until the end of the year. it may be. another will remain path than to finally start seriously er consider a diplomatic solution to this i never want to call the conflict diplomatic let’s say so the way out of that part of the time mr. ambassadors show signs of diplomatic life we ​​do not seriously consider, so to speak, the proposals or hints voiced by them, so it is

about their readiness or pseudo readiness for negotiations, but in any case, what corridors do you see in this aspect, it is about when, for example, their military teeth will finally be knocked out, when they will realize the inevitability of their military defeat, then they will logically come to this. and what would be the possibilities of solving the current extremely difficult dilemma. so we understand that for putin it is not just a defeat in the war, it is possible for him. the question of life and death, of course, we do not wish him anything good, but his the instinct will gather itself, something else will be the answer. well, you are right, he says that to his mother until now. in that war, it was just a game. at first, it was the sending of the medinsk e-e slutsky and company. at

this alleged negotiation about ukraine, it was just a game to calm the world markets and prevent the collapse of the russian economy there, now it is to avoid the danger, now you see diplomacy is mentioned, diplomacy is mentioned by them only in one context to discuss the implementation of our demands and their demands are in essence , the capitulation of ukraine, that is, what kind of diplomacy is this? what kind of compromise is this, and so on. this is absolutely another game and diplomacy will cease to be for them, however, and you say. i say only when he finally understands that he has lost kherson. and tomorrow he will lose even more and then maybe

something will start in what form they can be considered to wrap in what diplomatic paper they can wrap the fact that they will be forced to withdraw their occupying troops after they suffer a series of god willing of course powerful defeats oh in what mechanisms what they can't connect the whole thing to this. well, you know. well, it would be a very, very sharp change in rhetoric. if she really agreed to , for example, leading the un peacekeeping contingent, it was a very sharp change and but in principle, of course, he completely controls the political discourse of his country, he can do whatever he wants to try to sell it as a victory, or how he will succeed

. in fact, the interaction of two big players is me. if you believe sorkov, i think that sorkov is right in this regard, he is the supreme leader, as he says. they start eh lead to some kind of this inter -realistic ecstasy, hmm, which allows you to enjoy an absolutely barbaric war, how can a un peacekeeping mission fit into this tandem, for example, it will be, it would be very strong , of course, such a feint with a tail, and this is a discussion. and if to take the tactical local history of the zaporizhzhia

nuclear plant, is there any chance, somehow, i don’t know , to involve the general assembly and so on. well, because the radbes will be blocked by russia, so in order to resolve this issue and send there normal british or german or british-german spanish peacekeepers in the number of several battalions so that they, so to speak, ensured control over that potentially dangerous nuclear facility . there is nothing left in it except the weak sides, well, this is my personal opinion, that is, this war showed the weakness of the modern diplomatic system, the modern system of international

organizations, and it deepened this crisis to absolutely absolutely in-depth, and therefore, in principle , by and large, you can say that uh, multilateral diplomacy is dead today and uh, the solution is through multilateral platforms, uh, uh, of this zaporizhzhia crisis, oh, i don't know, that is, the mitigations have been decided, no, thank you for your frankness n ambassador oleksandr shcherba diplomat extraordinary plenipotentiary envoy of the first class extraordinary plenipotentiary ambassador of ukraine in austria at 2:21 p.m. worked live on the espresso tv channel at 15-12 we are with khrestyna yatskiv now we will attract new guests. oh, we will attract. moreover, it is not a pity that we have a topic that we need to talk about and it is not a pleasant one. so,

let's talk about the verkhovna rada of ukraine and what it can vote for in the near future. a draft law has been passed through the committee. 7654 which calls into question the competition for the director of the nabu and simplifies the procedure for his dismissal, in addition to the negative changes that are laid as landmines for the competition, the deputies also directly on the committee are talking about the servant of the people, pushed into the draft norm which narrows down the requirement regarding the political independence of the future director i will get it because it is with us yuliya klymenko people's deputy of ukraine we congratulate ms. yulia good day and pavlo bakunets people's deputy we also congratulate pavly glory to ukraine thank you for the word i wish everyone good health oh obviously if the story is fair to us too this is exactly what the ambassadors of the big seven say, who yesterday openly er-er worried they

turned to the ukrainian authorities and on this matter, so 76:54 er-er we understand we understand that we need certain legislative changes in order to in the end, we have become more and more clear with the anti-corruption system. at the same time, it is quite difficult to call what is being proposed constructive, ms. yulia, if it comes to a vote directly in the council, where will your vote be, uh, our vote will be in the council, uh, that's why that we have a party , a faction, a vote, but my colleagues and i clearly have a clear position that we are categorically against this law , we will not only vote against it, but we will make sure that it does not reach the second reading , because at a time when we are at war it is necessary to ask the world for additional funding for heavy weapons and to win the war against putin, we are starting political games rather, and our

colleagues are starting political games in order to push one of their candidates into office, this will not happen, we will do everything to this law did not reach the second reading. i believe that you will lose the support of international partners. especially since all the international partners of the g7 yesterday did not unequivocally say what they think about this law, to put it mildly, it is not timely. please this signal from the ambassadors j7 that is they wrote so simply because they had time and inspiration can this really have any serious consequences i think it will have serious consequences because if you see that in 6 months of war whatever the situation didn't happen in our verkhovna rada and in the country, they didn't allow themselves to give us our advice. and , actually, they supported us quite constructively. despite the fact that there were some laws , there were bills too. let's say so

are ambiguous, but this is a clear message that was given yesterday by the ambassadors of the united nations. i think it indicates that the international community is closely following these changes under this draft law and will state its clear position, which will be reflected later in support for ukraine on the international arena. we have to play with fire when i'm sorry we have such a situation e that we need more international support and more you see how putin is now rocking europe with rallies against the provision of arms to ukraine and er against against ukraine in general now is definitely not the time fan an additional e-e additional bonfire , we agree with you, sir, the story with the mobilization of the nabu law, clearly see that on the 195th day of the war, when our international partners

help us, and without their help, it would be difficult for us to fight the occupier, look for any distortions in the situation regarding the leaders of anti-corruption bodies, the dbr specialized anti-corruption prosecutor's office is absolutely abnormal , and that is why this draft law, authored by a deputy from monomajority and after this heated discussion, in which all groups and factions, except for the majority , expressed their opposition to narrowing the possibility of electing the heads of the nabu sap or other anti-corruption bodies, respectively, already today there is talk that this draft law will be removed

from consideration of the agenda, so i believe that our internal civil society, the international community, and the above- mentioned appeal by my colleague ms. yulia from j7 about the fact that this is a shameful bill was especially influential, so we believe that it will not be on the agenda this week well, what might be interesting on the agenda of the verkhovna rada this week, something small on the agenda this week will be, for example, clearly the situation regarding the coverage of the work and activities of the verkhovna rada during the next session. this is a special period, the period of war, there will be a resolution to the appeal to the countries of the european union and the governments, however, to cancel visas for russians and not to grant them to russians again, because the russians have

been killing european citizens of ukrainians since in 2014, especially since february of this year, the russians are simply raping them, shooting rockets in european ukrainian cities, that's why, of course, the road to the civilized world is closed to them, because they are occupiers, destroyers, rapists, after all, the rest and they want to settle there with money, they are so covered in the blood of ukrainians, that's why we appeal for that that they should be canceled and no more 2 maybe, mr. paly , well, according to the question to ms. klymenko, yes, literally yesterday, there was an extremely powerful battle between the deputy minister of defense of ukraine, ms. malarya accordingly, people's deputy mrs. bezugla, who works in the specialized committee on national security issues and so on. well, accordingly, this concerns, so to speak, the novelization or clarification of certain aspects

of the law on mobilization, which of course concerns women. it's all a matter well, not in some single formula that is understandable for everyone, yes, because the ministry of defense has voiced its clear position. i believe that the expansion of the actual number of professions for conscript women should be clearly regulated and reduced, you understand. if we need not only our million-strong army now, if we still mobilize women, then we will have no one to work. in the rear . actually, the number of professions should be

narrowed down, but the number of professions that are narrowed are doctors and those who are conscripted into the military and at the moment should clearly know what they have to do, and, actually, what rights and obligations they have joints e therefore, i think that it will be supported by the majority of the parliament and legislative changes will be introduced , the only thing is that it is unlikely in this session, because i do not see this bill on the agenda, and it will most likely happen a little later , but there is still time until 1 on october, when should the order come into effect, the ministry of defense and the ministry of defense made it clear that it will postpone this order, that is, from october 1, the number of professions and the number of women conscripts will not increase. i hope this consensus is also in it seems to the verkhovna rada and to me, among all ukrainians, because we need

two fronts with you, one front, which we have and where we have a million-strong army of women and men, and the second front is no less important is the economic one, where everyone works in their place, pays taxes, and in this way we also defeat putin, that's why this is the position. i hope it will be reflected in the draft law for which we will vote, maybe in a week or two. please share additional information good, it is specifically about the mobilization of women. well, according to the restrictions on their departure . no, i also support this opinion. they are important in times of war. it is clear that putting all ukrainian women on the military register is not a good idea. that is why this bill exists. actually submitted to it is not on the agenda of this week, it

will definitely be considered for three weeks, i think that there will be a consensus in the hall to reduce the number of professions to a few, which women who have these professions will have to register with on october 1, everyone else is definitely theirs and very briefly, dear, it will be a debatable issue in the context of the final destination of the money that we receive from excise taxes on fuel in the event that they will normally return, yaroslav zheleznyak writes that according to his information today until 23:59 when the deadline for submitting peacocks to the relevant draft law is coming up. there may be several hundred of them. in the ninth, a review committee was appointed regarding the return of excise taxes to be brought quickly and then to the hall for the next meeting. well, just a little twitches mr. zheleznyak says that super mario would envy the level of desire to build roads again,

what to do with excise taxes and is it really so bad to return them in order to somehow resuscitate those really affected by the war let's be honest ukrainian roads ms. julia well, i am the author of the edit that says that from the e-e excise tax will have to be directed exclusively to roads that were destroyed as a result of e-e military actions no other roads will be built, this means that the roads where e-e are either not affected or those roads that at the moment, the front-line areas will not be rebuilt , only those that have really suffered as a result of hostilities will be rebuilt, but those that can already be exploited where there are safe areas are the author of this amendment, i will insist on this and for the money that you received from excise taxes, they really went to roads that needed them, and not just paid off by contractors , whose debts, actually, were accumulated even before the war

, thank you and mr. pavlo, please give me a minute. well, of course, it is always more difficult to introduce taxes than them cancel what was canceled in principle, the excise tax was until february of this year, it is being restored in a smaller amount, i think that this is the right and far from popular decision. of course, it is unacceptable to use these funds to make new autobahns, and these funds will not be enough to make them , first of all, we are talking about e- however, to restore the road infrastructure, for example, in chernihiv, in the sumy region around kyiv, where people are already returning, where there is no longer a threat there, well, there will be an invasion tomorrow and there are bridges destroyed, for example, people from buchi from nearby forces around the capitals drive to detour the destroyed bridges to them this adds 1.5-2 hours to the drive that's why this infrastructure

needs to be restored thank you, dear people 's deputies we wish you success in the upcoming plenary session i would really like to see your work online but i'm not sure that we will have such pleasure yuliya klymenko and pavlo bakunets, people's deputies of ukraine were in touch with us thank you antin borkovsky about the work, stay tuned to espresso tv channels, now a little pause after which you get a dose fresh important information to quickly help with back pain you need a powerful action against pain dolaren gel comes to the rescue and relieves pain tolerance gel strength against pain good evening we are from ukraine vasyl zimi's big broadcast my name is

actually winter two hours of airtime until 9:00 p.m. two hours of your time, we will talk about the most important thing, two hours to learn about the war, it turns out that our broadcast serhiy zhoretska military summaries of the day and what is the world, what is there in the world , yuri the physicist will tell two hours to be in oleksandr borschyvsia at the economic news course of radio operators. he talks about the economy during the war and new sports. evgeny pastukhov is ready to talk about sports for 2 hours in the company of his favorite hosts about culture during the war . he is ready to talk about culture during the war. of optimism , mrs. natalka didenko is ready to tell us, as well as distinguished guests of the studio, we will have volodymyr ogrysko today, if everything goes well, the events of the day in two hours, the big broadcast of vasyl zimi, a project for smart and caring people in the evening nayspresso good evening we are from ukraine