give him the opportunity to run for president, for example, because he left the country for more than 21 days. well, you know the films. this is not a matter of national security, well, these are absurd things that you are doing, you are undermining the rule of law in the state. scoundrels who left the country in a difficult time, well, don’t miss the competition. show them to all the people and tell them how this person wants to be the director of nabu if she fled the country and somewhere there is not for a serious reason, but just somewhere there was she sitting on the beach or was she just hiding from the war, so everyone will understand you, no one will say no, no, appoint him, but if you write a law that limits millions of people in their rights, that is, the question arises, what do you think tomorrow, uh, about another one topic i wanted to ask you i am from the communique i don't know very well i will remind you that all our

officials who are officials are there in order to get the appropriate position and restrictions in fact based on age , etc. that is, the fact that millions of citizens can not get it is normal means, secondly, i twice during six months, i had to read, read, oleksiy , the legislation, you will learn a lot about lviv, transcarpathia, and other things. for humanitarian reasons, i needed to bring the appropriate trucks to fastov to kyiv oblast. to go to lviv for two days so that there would be no problems there. they were moving normally to fastov. there, fuel should be re-found in order to overload so many eu deputies in lviv, i am nowhere i didn't even accept it in the session. i didn't see them together at all. i understand when i talked with the lviv woman that they have been together for 6 months. i'm sorry.

look at yourself. well, i want to end this discussion. it's a very interesting discussion. in fact, the problem seems to be that mr. the president's personal belongings are a box ah well , first of all, i am talking with you about some principles that are important to a democratic country, and you are just insulting me with some insults, well, that's good, secondly, everyone is responsible for themselves. russians rolled away from kyiv, did not leave kyiv for a single minute, not that there for a day for a minute, and this is the second time, the third time, deputies from the eu are fighting for the state today and there are those who are at the front, i would simply ask with respect to all i look, you said 10 times in the eu. i never once said servant of the people, and when i said about transcarpathia, you

probably decided that it was about your people, you surely know more. i never once mentioned the name of the faction, why is this one doing something stupid to specific questions that i asked you are you just engaged in some kind of political struggle? and how is he not engaged in? i want you to give ukraine the upper hand. they did it there, tell me, please tell me, we will also restrict rights, the truth is, this is the next question: everyone in lviv, everyone, everyone, who is in lviv. we will also be able to keep them until lviv. this is your business, it is absurd, please, so far , it has not happened so, in principle, what, gentlemen, i thank you

you are very much in favor of any discussion, in fact there is so little discussion between the representatives of the government and the representatives of the opposition, because , unfortunately, there is so that there is both the government and the opposition, and the government does not let the opposition forget that it is the opposition, so to speak, but this is by the way a question for mr. oleg, there is almost enough censorship on television and let's give a little democracy. this is this, this is this, this seems to me to be an important moment. actually , there was no time to ask oleg dundon, and this is an important question. maybe one day we will talk about it, mr. oleg dunda voted for the onoproject law 76:54 in the committee against which the seven countries of the big seven spoke out right away and said that they were watching carefully, only depriving, well, actually undermining the capabilities of the nabu uhu, i actually wonder why oleg voted for it, what was it about him there were some arguments, and if he voted, then why

didn't he stand up on the second day and say what was going on. where is my bill, why is it not supported, a new male one appeared overnight? where did he start? why should he vote for it now? no i know, i don't know what happened and now we have an uncontrolled nabu again. how can we live on like this? who else will now initiate criminal cases against the authorities? well, there is no unity in this country and try to win this war here. well, let's continue. myroslava gongadze is already with us. head of the voice of america in eastern europe ms. miroslava congratulations, we are glad to see you. well, we are certainly glad to hear about the news regarding the additional aid package for 675 million dollars. additional details that are painted everywhere there and uh and armored cars and armored cars for protection and uh matsnuzi for for medical medical

armored cars there and uh missiles there and special uh special uh uh ammunition that is, these are actually all the details that are everywhere it is important that this assistance is provided and it is also important that they have started talking about the systematic nature of this assistance because so far, in fact, despite all these bright statements and announcements, assistance is provided, so to speak, according to the experts' assessment half was provided, but today, now, at the rammstein base, again at this meeting, which coordinates the provision of assistance to ukraine

. regarding blinkin's visit he was very sudden and what he really meant was it just a signal or was it also out of necessity some visit well i think that the united states never does that not ner- they don't make visits without signals and if the secretary of state was already in europe , then it was logical in connection with the fact that ukraine had started this full-scale operation to liberate its territories, it was important for the united states to demonstrate the visit at such an official high level, so really visit, because they knew very little about it, but i would perceive this visit as such a signal that the united states is ready to

continue this assistance and not to stop in supporting ukraine, and so to speak, a sign of distinction of these of ukraine's efforts, which are now quite successful, but so far the united states is not ready to recognize russia as a terrorist state sponsor of terrorism, could this change with the time of the united states congress, and both parties are actually pushing for russia to be recognized as a sponsor of terrorism and in principle, i suspect that the decision, if it is as it is today, is not final, because it all depends on the general situation on the front in ukraine and on the actions that russia will take, you see now in not only in international relations

, for example, at the un level, they started talking about the fact that russia should behave accordingly in the un security council, because they announced yet another discussion about the supply of weapons to the military in ukraine, so this discussion the question of participation and the issue of vive continue. and russia's membership in the un security council is also beginning to be discussed again, so to speak, so nothing. today, no decision can be called final. i am convinced, that is, in fact, from what will happen and the status of russia will also change, because i understand that this story with non-recognition and sponsoring terrorism is a story that stretches back to the soviet union, when the students of the united states, having this opportunity, did not use it, not wanting to close the channels of diplomatic relations, it will simply mean

that well, you know that in the white house until now, for some reason, they believe that there is a possibility of a discussion with russia , the window for us at pravda remains slightly ajar and they do not completely close it, well and i think that you probably also paid attention to the position of the ukrainian side, in particular, in particular, the commander of the armed forces of ukraine, where he stated that the possible use of tactical nuclear weapons by russia is not excluded, and that is also enough. well, so to speak, weighty the factor that the united states still thinks that this window should be left open now literally ended the discussion on such a hot note with two ukrainian comments, and the essence of it is that

uh, there was almost a draft law that was not passed, which would actually torpedo the effectiveness and independence of the main national anti-corruption bureau of ukraine, and suddenly there was a lightning-fast absolute reaction of ambassadors jason and the same close-minded, but without explanation, reaction of the faction of the servant of the people who just suddenly they didn't include it was it was introduced here a completely different conflict appears for me this whole story i wonder in what section whether the united states in particular closely monitors the process taking place in ukraine because we sometimes from the middle it seems that there is also an internal front and there are various temptations to depart from democratic principles during martial law or for example to return some corruption schemes during the war and so on. attention to the information about what is happening in the middle

of ukraine at the level of decision-making, who controls the decision-making processes, all this information is traceable, exists, and, for now, just in these conditions of war, there is a lot. internally, both in europe and in the united states, they decide that they do not speak publicly about the problems they see in the internal processes of ukraine, but all this is very clearly fixed and noted, and if it is necessary to make some very drastic statements or signals, they e- they are done under conditions when in fact there is no other way out and whether to avoid or otherwise encourage the ukrainian authorities to act in accordance with the democrats in principle do not exist ms. myroslava in conclusion i don't know have you seen such a

by the network, it's like on the talent show america from got tilland, one of the participants is heymers, and here we had a discussion with andrii is it real is it really, this is how they edited and put this talent on the air show did someone edit it to amuse the ukrainians, you know i'm sorry for this information , it's the first time i've seen this story on your air, but i 'll definitely double-check it, it's interesting but i can say that you know in the united states there is so much support for ukraine that well, i would n't be surprised if it was actually correct well, what can we expect from you? confirmation or refutation? thank you for the conversation. myroslava gongadze, the head of the voice of america in eastern europe, was with us. well, it's interesting and i'm interested to hear from a person who is closer

to where you 're from. there's that hummer. we're just waiting for some kind of statement from the mother-show, then what else is there? how do we have any interesting people? well, i would also ask him, well, less about that. well, dear friends and colleagues, we're moving on and uh then let's talk a little about such things as energy energy is important because we are not entering winter, and the muscovites even filmed a whole video in krasnoyarsk, they filmed it last year, and here i am already thinking that krasnoyarsk was filmed in krasnoyarsk , it is somewhere in siberia, siberia, where the winter is minus 40, and they filmed there, this is the city icicles and stuck flags of the european union everywhere and said that this is brussels well, maybe the residents of krasnoyarsk have never been to brussels and that's why they basically thought wow exactly in brussels yes yes what is that

brussels? yes, plus or minus, you know how much worse yes, they are now and it is more difficult for the deputy to get to brussels to see him live eh so what kind of winter will it really be like they painted in krasnoyarsk and what will it be like in our country oleksiy orzhel minister of energy and environmental protection of ukraine in 2019-2020 and gennadiy ryabtsev, expert on energy issues, director of special projects, entoce-psychia, we welcome you, good gentlemen, and actually all this time we are trying to understand what it means if in simple words this is an attempt to limit the maximum prices for russian energy carriers and how this strategy can work if it is effective at this moment oleksiy, maybe you can explain this technology literally like a former minister on your fingers well, in fact, it is the

right step, it is possible that we lost some time when i was talking about a full barge, but it is very difficult to organize a full barge and not to create pressure on the market, not to create shortage factors that pull the price up, and precisely the price limitation due to the instruments of insurance because of the fact that the main trainers buy the price of the urals brand no more than the price determined at the j7 level or at the a-a level of the state governments, which means that, accordingly, the rashistaya do not receive more than profits, they can not spend these profits to finance their terrorist army and, accordingly, in of them , the potential for military aggression decreases, and as a result, if all civilized countries and traders

take the urals brand at a price of $40. this means , for example, that india and china, realizing that there is such a price in the world, will not buy this e-e brand more expensive than this price was created by those players on the market, so it is absolutely the right approach to take the resource, that is, they still have to sell it. this is 35%. i'm sorry, i'll interrupt you literally for a second. and if the russians say that and we won't sell, for example, to the countries that i decided to implement this price policy, and we'll only sell there to india, north korea, and a couple of people from myanmar get our oil, well, you understand that the demand has decreased, which means that india can also say that give it to us for $50, or for $45 when you don’t sell to someone, he himself limits the leaflets

accordingly and the price is already determined by the buyer, this is the first point, and you don’t want to sell the second point. and how will you finance your budget in your country, which country does not create uh, additional very serious sources. and what are exported uh, hi- tech goods, there is none of this and more than that. now the big question is: is it possible to buy russian weapons ? the market is narrowing for the uranus brand and there will be less money even if they refuse to supply the country with their so-called, as they call unfriendly, well, again, there are no advantages for the russians. and how much will it hit the russian pocket, about 30-6%. it's only oil, 10-11% is natural gas, and it

's at the prices that were, well, in the fall of last year, if we look at it, the price there was more than a thousand dollars for natural gas, and the price was about 100 dollars, less than 100 dollars per brand brand as a reference brand ural was traded with at a discount somewhere 4-5 dollars, now the discount there is more than 30. forty dollars for the mark-urals, and this means that the funding of about 40% of the federal budget will lose, well, the order of the monetary potential, well , by 50-60%, at least, what is your assessment? europeans in particular will be able to come to an agreement now and

it is happening . give up well, and secondly, why then, in market conditions, now this price has soared, now russia will receive surplus profits from energy trade and oil is sold at prices that are twice as high as those foreseen by the federal budget of the russian federation. the period of sanctions is not in question at all russia will receive surplus profits from energy trade this year next year hmm rather even the whole of next year and if the federal budget 44.2 dollars per barrel of yurel is the average price. now, the discount is no longer 35-40 dollars per barrel, but $15-20

per barrel, that is, the surplus profits are large, and therefore it is quite understandable. why are the european union and jesoven now trying to somehow limit these profits, but in my opinion they have chosen the wrong tactics. they are trying to interfere in what has been built up for decades, and it is about the functioning of energy markets in the model of functional energy markets, while it is necessary to limit the appetites of non-energy markets companies and financial speculators that led actually to the fact that now gas quotations are 2,800 per 1,000 cubic meters, and oil hm is about 90

taken, although accordingly, if we proceed from the ratio of supply, demand, that is, to be guided by economic laws, then gas should cost somewhere at the level of 7 million dollars per thousand cubic meters if we talk about europe and oil is $4,510. that is, this is all the military premium, this is all the expectation of those who pour speculative capital into the market and then take this speculative capital from regarding them, the restrictions are going to be established regarding j7 oil, they did not make a decision on the introduction of restrictions, it only opened a discussion and is collecting proposals on possible mechanisms of e-e

price restrictions. the situation is very strange here , because the european e-e leaders, more precisely , representatives of the european commission of the european union, they declare that they are going to set a limited e-e m-m price cap, i.e. the highest prices for russian gas, but how will they determine it? after all, there are no contracts between states , there are contracts signed between business entities and e. the price and terms of supply are a commercial secret. if, in some way, these conditions are changed without the consent of the parties, gazprom will simply submit a lawsuit to the international arbitration and with a high probability will win this process, that is, in my opinion here, well, it is difficult for me to say what was invested in and

will be invested in the mechanism of price limitation, the beginning and mechanisms need to be developed for that in order to limit the very excess profits of the russian federation, the only sources were the flow of funds, a large part of which goes to finance the war in ukraine, we have literally three minutes left if, er, i would ask you, during this time, to try to assess the readiness of the ukrainian economy itself for the winter is everything done as effectively and optimally as possible so that ukraine can pass this winter? they were even called the heating season, because it sounds weak in the face of war. sir, go away well, i would say that, in principle, they are now talking about big numbers, and there are general figures for the

injection of natural gas, the number of storage facilities, the amount of coal is 2.7 14 + billion cubic meters of gas storage facilities, and in fact, based on the decrease in consumption, it is really possible to enter the the heating season is a problem in a local problem, in particular if we look at the cities of kropyvnytskyi, chernihiv and sumy oblast, where the heat supply systems were hit, where repairs really needed to be made and not much was done, no managed to put it into operation, and that's why it's precisely the decision of the mobile boiler house, the decision regarding the options, the finding of some, well, they say that it is potentially possible to evacuate the regions , not because of shelling, but because of the fact that it is not possible to ensure the passage of the heating season a we will come precisely in this mode, when there will be a reaction

to the local situation, er, when er, people can really be left under no systems of life, water supply , heating, archist, there are terrorists, they will be beat in front of these systems and it is necessary to talk about the fact that every ukrainian should understand for himself what his potential plan is if he loses well, if there is no electricity supply for one day a week , he has to find options, maybe a house in the village somewhere, maybe some kind of individual household as well - and it is possible to talk with friends and relatives so that everyone understands where you can stay and where you can find shelter just in case there are any critical situations .

to sum up, well, the cabinet of ministers, in my opinion, got carried away with the formation of reserves, forgetting about the communication component, now it is necessary to explain to all citizens of ukraine that the normal passage of the heating season depends on each of us, the center cannot provide everyone with fuel and energy, especially if we are talking about left bank ukraine, which was the most affected by shelling and areas some of which were under occupation. that is, where everything is destroyed, it will be very difficult to ensure the normal passage of the heating season with in view of this, the cabinet of ministers of ojsc should now intensify this very explanatory work and explain, including locally and to the united territorial communities, that now they have all the powers to provide their own citizens with energy sources to provide e-e

the fact that there is something that is present in this or that region, and it was not used before to wait to sit and wait for kyiv to transfer some funds, resources, mobile boiler houses or diesel generators - this is a bad tactic that must be taken take the initiative into your own hands and think about what we can provide ourselves during the heating season, and local sources of energy - this is what burjuyki are local sources of energy - this is peat - this is gas condensate, this is propane-butane - this is oil - this is coal, energy and this is biomass - it's biogas, well, i don't know what other sources of energy there are, because in the same poltava region, in dnipropetrovsk region, in kharkiv region, there are a huge number of conserved

temporarily conserved wells that were not used due to economic impracticability but they can now be used to produce the same gas condensate on which it is also easy enough to ensure that it is also easy enough to provide power to the same mobile boiler houses, this also applies to propane-butane plants and low-productivity plants that process petroleum raw materials and some of them briquettes and pellets and er, any chaff that used to be just straw or straw, like me, used to be thrown away, but now it can be used the same firewood that is also on it, on which there are few people, something happened to us with in connection, but very, very local fuel can be found

. however, there is currently no possibility of budgets on the ground and to finance these solutions, and this is also a problem in cities that are mega mega mega unprofitable. and gennadiy ryabtsev express energy issues, the director of special projects of the anti-tepsikey were with us and told us about what winter will be like in europe and here, and now iryna koval will tell about what happened in the last hour in the news release, she has already selected a selection. thank you , colleagues. in just a moment, i will tell you about the situation in different regions of our country.