it still comes out war war and our victory seven days a week from monday monday seven different spheres of human activity sports culture politics eight presenters of express journalists experts opinion leaders in real time about the most current events through the prism of war every day author's projects on espresso after two tours carpathians in the leaders of the tournament table during this time, the lviv team did not concede a single goal, will the carpathians be able to keep their goal impregnable in the match against chernivtsi bukovyna, or will they be able to win bukovyna and stay at the top of the standings, we will find out already this sunday, september 11. watch football together with the title sponsor of the karpaty football club and the sponsor is the pumb bank. live broadcast of the match karpaty lviv

bukovyna chernivtsi on the youtube channel espresso. the pre-match studio starts at 16:30. the match starts at 17:00 00 how to register as an internally displaced person if you left your home but did not cross the state border of ukraine register as an internally displaced person at your new place of residence contact the social welfare authority public protection or to an authorized person in the executive committee of the local council or to the center for providing administrative services of the central administrative service, you can also submit an application online through the application action prepare a document certifying identity and confirming citizenship of ukraine or a special status in the absence of a passport, you can register for registration on the

basis of a digital document or certificates from the state migration service of ukraine. you can get a certificate from the state migration service even in the case of moving within one settlement of the district of the oblast i have influence i welcome you on the expresso channel, the ukrainian army is conducting active counteroffensive actions in the kherson region and in the south of the country, liberating points occupied by the enemy population, what tactics, equipment and weapons are used by our military in these ground operations, what are the armed forces, and what is still lacking despite foreign aid? can we move in the combat operations of our land units to a qualitatively different level. and what is needed for this , how will the decisions that were adopted at the meeting of the rammstein defense ministers help in this

5 find answers to these questions project manager in one of the domestic defense industry companies p mykola i congratulate you good day and also vyacheslav kiss military analyst and now a serviceman of the special operations forces vyacheslav greets you good day thank you for including from the front line in our program if the situation will change, then you will really act at your own discretion and i will start with the fact that the ukrainian army in the kharkiv region liberated more than 20 settlements and the ukrainian forces penetrated the enemy's defense to a depth of 20 km this was reported yesterday by the deputy head of the main operational department of the general staff of ukraine, oleksiy gromov, the offensive continues. by the way, we can see the map and see that the advance is taking place in the kharkiv region and further according to the classics and in practice, because many of our viewers do not even

realize what the order of battle is, what forces must be exerted to advance deep into the enemy's territory tell us a little bit about the general things that the audience had an understanding of how difficult it is to organize such combat operations and what kind of order of battle can be on the battlefield the classics are the combat statutes, regardless of whether the armed forces of ukraine or the armed forces of the russian federation are all the same, the roots are the combat statutes of the armed forces of the soviet army and, in principle , the combat statutes of the armed forces of ukraine and the armed forces of the russian army are different . where reconnaissance is target identification and artillery training - this is the accumulation

of troops that cross certain lines along the deployment storming the front edge of the enemy , this is an imaginary area of ​​defense, this is a classic uh, for movies, but in life everything is much more complicated why because as soon as we move to real combat operations, all those plans that were made they are carried out somewhere from 40% to 40 to a maximum of 60, but life makes significant adjustments , this is a classic in this situation probably not working why because in the mountains it was perfectly clear again and perfectly understood that the accumulation of reserves by the armed forces of ukraine was going on and about this the enemy public quite often heard that

our 25th brigade and the 80th airborne assault brigade were accumulating in this direction there were 92 the brigade at the same time, when they moved on to the next, that is, to the destruction of the enemy directly, the armed forces of ukraine will be able to carry out a fairly successful offensive, we will return to this topic, and vyacheslav, i would like to ask you, i am not asking about the section of the front, where are you now how do we manage to carry out active and successful counter-offensive actions without having an advantage in heavy armored vehicles and not having an advantage in personnel helps us to advance or some nuances about which we do not know, well, first of all, this is planning. it seems to me that an offensive operation in the kharkiv region this is the first operation where in certain moments it develops even better than it prevailed, which

helps quality planning, quality communication, er, modern weapons for this topic, for example, the same haimars, er, self-propelled artillery installations well , first of all, this is the heroism of our armed forces of our the infantry of some famous troops, that is, these factors allow us to inflict heavy losses on the enemy and actually develop this offensive operation. in less than a week, this is a significant rate of advance based on the combat statutes. is this a normal rate? how to evaluate these indicators of the depth of penetration into the enemy’s defenses from the point of view of the existing requirements of the statutes, it means that it is quite difficult to manage there, in what way are the statutes designed for the mass

use of troops, that is, for the mass use of modern means of destruction, i.e. aviation and artillery, concentration on breakthrough areas, up to a hundred rounds per kilometer of the offensive , and so on. concentration in the areas of offensives of e-e shock e-e fists, that is, battalion tactical groups that are assigned specific tasks and if we take into account that in 4.5 days e-e about 50 km, that is, in modern conditions, where the pace of the offensive is really very successful . in the future, we will come back to

this when more information appears, to study all these things in order to train the next generations of our officers and our soldiers. vyacheslav would like to ask you. uh the donetsk direction and the south, do these theaters put forward any requirements for the tactics of our units and the requirements for the weapons that we are given. the main attention for solving tasks on this or that tvd well, the terrain is actually somewhat different, it is primarily the vegetation er-er the density of populated areas er- these are beams, water obstacles and so on, but it should be noted that if we take the donetsk direction, there is a higher density of our forces and russian forces in kharkiv. it is smaller in

kherson, maybe less than in kharkiv. maybe the same one, that is, in such conditions due to the fact that the length of the front of the ukrainian-russian war is quite significant , it is important, the role is, first of all, it is communication, it is intelligence, and as we have already done in previous programs they said in terms of aerial reconnaissance, ukraine despite the presence of other unmanned vehicles there by the russians. now we can already see the advantage of the ukrainian side that even small groups of russians cannot effectively hide from fire damage . accompanying satellites, for example, the same old ones and means of remote destruction, we are again returning to the heimers to modern

self-propelled artillery systems. the armor of the hoods are crabs . er, due to the use of bardetank and mechanized units, mykola, when we talk about this concept announced by vyacheslav, which is actually a classic, we will still manage what we really lack enough power of armored vehicles and heavy armored vehicles is what ensures a breakthrough, are there any asymmetric approaches to neutralize the enemy's advantage in the number of armored vehicles and use some non-standard solutions that can relatively speaking push into the enemy's defenses, asymmetric approaches

are examples of possibilities for the ukrainian war, er, vyacheslav correctly emphasized that timely intelligence and detection of enemy resistance nodes allows er to concentrate and concentrate the the available armored vehicles that we have, we have some in order to bypass these resistance nodes, and not in vain, when it came to the fact that balaklia is surrounded, well, this is the enemy's resistance node, eh, they did not bypass it, and for three days, eh after all, we achieved that balaklia was liberated, it was liberated primarily not due to frontal attacks, but due to the fact that the enemy lost contact with the main e-e with the main masses of his troops, that is, the paths were cut delivery of ammunition. these are the methods

when the timely concentration of the shock villages is the same tank battalions of the brigades, again there are also those reinforced units that are used from other brigades, but so far you do not announce it, is it bringing its results, or is it possible? as i understand it, we are talking about the fact that any war can be said to be a war for the flanks and it is for cutting the enemy's wet native support, that is, these two components that remain important in any military operation, but when we talk about the experience of other militaries companies therefore they say what when we are talking about the south there, and i sometimes mention the fact that sometimes it resembles an echo of such an operation in desert storm, which was carried out by the allies

, decided under the leadership of the united states, where it can be said that there were 39 days of strikes on attrition and four days were spent there for operation sword in the desert, where in four days already at the expense of the ground units, they ensured the advance through the exhausted areas of the enemy or such a concept. it corresponds to the fact that we will now do it in the south, a question for you vyacheslav i i'm sorry, i'm driving a bit here, so i can't hear very well in general terms, yes, the company in the south is developing quite slowly there, in fact, the armed forces of ukraine are persuading the russian army, maybe we see that the company's offensive in the south has begun earlier than in the

kharkiv region, this could lead to the fact that the russian automobile reserves were transferred then and then, when it was already possible to pull the enemy back, the armed forces of ukraine began their offensive in the kharkiv region, plus we understand that on in the kherson region, well, the russians are quite heavy there, they are cut off from support, so it is very easy and possible to grind them down there. such a tactic was chosen in that direction. and in the kharkiv region, we see more rapid offensive companies . he is forced to abandon fortified positions because he is cut off from supplies, abandons equipment, abandons weapons, abandons a huge pile of ammunition, we have never seen so much as trophies, that is, the company on

it is somewhat different in kherson oblast and, er, in kharkiv oblast, and the analogies to world military history are somewhat different. thank you, mr. mykola, you mentioned that we were surrounded by balaclava. but a significant number of tank units seems to be the largest number of tank btg precisely in the raisin zone. why could they not use this accumulated military power? what has hindered them until now ? by the command of the armed forces of ukraine in the izyum direction, it does not give the opportunity to use the existing armored forces, why? because the density of anti-tank weapons in the infantry is what it

takes . - here these are the presence of high-tech anti-tank means, these are javelin anti-tank guided complexes , eh, groan-p eh-e t n-lau, this is the same, the same panzerfausts and the rest of the disposable anti-tank grenade launchers, eh, it begins to cause in russian tankers of anti-tank weapons. so it is very difficult to force now to go on the attack even against infantry units. because in order to look at the modern defense, it is necessary to use a lot of artillery shells and mortar mines

. the consumption of ammunition, and with ammunition, in the last few weeks , the russians are starting to have problems with their delivery, and the presence of actually , a large number of tanks, this is not a guarantee that these tanks will be able to be to use so, it is necessary to take into account, again, under the raisin, the terrain is quite complex, so , uh, forested area, there are a lot of beams, yarik yariv . actually, in order to use tanks there, you have to approach it very skillfully. so, uh, when there are no modern intelligence tools when they use maps that were created

a dozen, a half, two dozen, three dozen years ago and were not updated in a timely manner, this creates a lot of problems vyacheslav, how do you assess the risks of the russian contrast in the kharkiv direction the body of the alternator that we understand that part of the russian btg is outside our territory in reserve, can we expect that they will try to repel us from the positions occupied by ukrainian units during this week? yes, of course, every offensive operation is constantly under risk of counteroffensive actions, i agree with you that the russians have reserves on the territory of the russian federation, they probably have them now and the btg that you were assigned to restore combat capability now they will be quickly loaded

on railway carriages and enter in order to first restrain us, i.e. the armed forces of ukraine, and secondly to go into a counteroffensive. when the ukrainian army has not yet established itself sufficiently for new problems, but what we see is our excellent infantry, it immediately takes the front line, is strengthened, and here it really is anti-tank weapons and the density of which are now really, well, probably the most out there in the world, they allow even our infantry units, which do not have armored vehicles, to pose a serious threat to the russians, therefore, they are more likely to meet the resistance to their counteroffensive actions may look for alternative routes, and here we again return to the advantages of ukraine in means of intelligence, that is, those btgs that will be unloaded

, they will be detected and remote means of impression again, we return to the high-barts, which are armored more than once today they said, they will simply try to destroy them at unloading points, concentration points, and so on , that is, the russians will most likely try to go into a counteroffensive. but will they succeed in this before what losses on their part will this lead to? well, let's see, let's work. i want us to watch one video and you comment on it. now let's try to find a recipe for it. this is where the ukrainian and marine corps demonstrated an assault on russian positions in one of the occupied villages, using both tanks and i mean, it 's about the use of turkish machines, it's porcupines, where they just move right behind the tanks. it's just a wonderful and interesting video, but i have

certain questions, usually when we talk about us that is, we understand that the tanks go, then the bmp go, and then everything actually. does this mean that we use some other suitable, and is there a place, relatively speaking, for these machines to rap in battle order, as demonstrated by the marines e p mykola first, tell us your ot ratings of this video on ramps were created absolutely for other purposes, a slave is mine resistant a-a andrusher-protect e-e that is, it is e-e when in iraq the united states of america met with such a phenomenon that more than 60% of personnel losses are losses from fire rifle weapons from ambushes, as well as from the use of improvised explosive devices, the

pentagon set a task for weapons manufacturers to develop and manufacture in mass quantities vehicles that are resistant to the detonation of anti-tank mines, as well as for improvised explosive devices. well there, the mass of improvised explosive devices sometimes reached even 200 kg, respectively, 200 kg does not withstand, but 1.5-2 explosives, which are not formed in a single warhead. well, he still protects the personnel, but we are not from good life, we use raps as about non-transporters eh because even armored personnel carriers they should not be used in combat formations. moreover, not in armored combat formations at one time for armored

combat formations. infantry fighting vehicles or mp1 bmp-2 bmp 3 were created in the west those the same bradleys are the same british combat vehicles but now in the west these vehicles are firstly they have too powerful armor protection life forced them to armor and now a modern combat vehicle is suitable this weight is 3 40 t, the weight of a modern light tank or soviet e-e standards, this is the weight of a medium battle tank, and then even a main battle tank, so the marines are heroic e-e people who use, as a matter of fact, for delivery to the collision, anti-vehicle and anti-vehicle vehicles that

must carry out which are used during patrols during the transfer of troops, but by no means for storming the enemy's firing positions raps as the chosen transporters, even rather the quality of bmp, it’s really not. from a good life it’s much more than nothing, but here is another moment, i would like to note that now in kharkiv oblast and kherson oblast, for a long period of time, the front had a stable character and both sides set up anti-tank mini-fields and indeed anti-tank mines , they pose a serious enough threat when going on the offensive, and secondly, when moving primarily along dirt roads, that is, anti-tank mines are a serious problem for

armored vehicles and here is a car that well, let's say it directly , it is not designed to attack a stronghold of the opposition, but a car that reduces the risk of losses when hitting a mine, this is already a good enough option, that is, i saw what i saw and we are also advancing on non-armored auto mechanics and all the time er expecting not to go on an anti-tank mine and here having such a car as a brother it is much better than nothing so it really is not a good life to use these cars to storm strongholds but if the directors help us then we we will show a video not only about porcupines, but especially about the american max pro armored vehicles, which we

received in a fairly significant number from the united states. they are already used in the armed forces and there, er. by the way, just this video that shows the appearance of these machines e max pro, which we received from the united states, they were used in several military conflicts of the united states. but after that, i would ask that they show us a video where, relatively speaking, these machines try to overcome b-b- mud and they actually load it, that is, due to excessive weight, they cannot pass through the areas where we are conducting offensive actions, if this video is found, then we will watch it now, and in any case, as i understand it, it is precisely the lack of bmps and armored personnel carriers that we have to implement such non-standard approaches now that we are moving further towards the very needs of bmp and apc, we

have a significant number of samples of foreign-made armored vehicles, which we are beginning to receive for e-e in the form of foreign aid, which are mykola, samples from foreign bmps or battleships were singled out as the ones that are most optimally suited to our theater of military operations, if we also mention french vehicles there and, er, german tracked bmps, there is little that can be singled out that can really be useful to us so i am still a supporter of what would bring us the greatest benefit. these are the machines that were created in the soviet union and then the polytensies were produced in the countries of the former warsaw pact or were created on the chassis based on such machines. unfortunately, almost everywhere

world, we have already been able to use what we were able to use to the maximum, and now the question arises that we need to use what we will be given , well, in reality, only those countries that have a sufficiently large amount of it will be able to give us in real time of combat equipment, it is primarily the united states of america, it is primarily great britain and france. that is probably all because even germany