these, well, it’s just in an ordinary hardware store, well, it’s customary to say goodbye to a former manager, if you even look at how i look there on facebook, the records of my old, er, acquaintances who held high positions in soviet ukraine, when one of them dies, they write even now, such an official obituary that they used to write for the newspaper radyanska ukrainy and everyone subscribes to it and publishes it on facebook. why is this only well, because the ethics are the same, the person died, we worked with her, there could have been different relationships, but she was in the central committee, we were in the central committee, it was different offices. we went there, made acquaintances, knew each other from the wives . because of this ethics , i say don't go there, because volodymyr volodymyrovych won't come and they all don't go, that's the only one who came - this is dmitry medvedev, why?

because he is putin's favorite, he can afford it . nothing will happen to him, he can leave i can’t even go to a funeral for money, to the american embassy, ​​but i can go to a funeral, but to medvedev, the list of people who can afford to do something, well, it ends, no one in the russian leadership can afford an independent act, is it similar to north korea that's why when they say that putin will make a decision on the use of nuclear weapons, for example, with someone, it's funny to hear it's a formal procedure, these people will fear putin more than their own death, and that's how they build authoritarian regime in russia, elections are already underway, three-day voting, and by the way, it's not just 3d for voting, it's the 11th, tomorrow is the only voting day, that's when they were going to hold a referendum in our country, it's on our territory,

we have to talk about this vote as a significant one they were seriously going to hold elections for the election of the kherson zaporozhye luhansk donetsk regions to join russia instead of elections. they are going to explain this to the voters inside the country for referendums. they said that they are not preparing, we know that it was the only vote of the federal government . when i think about these referendums, well, really, i think all the time that this is also an element of blackmail. well , in transnistria, i don't remember how many referendums there were on joining russia, they didn't join it as they were going to join kherson zaporizhzhia oblast still no one

knows why they held referendums there, because kherson zaporizhzhia oblast is not an independent state, there is no clause in the legislation of russia that would have allowed annexing the territories of other countries. there is simply no need to change the legislation . there were proposals. this did not happen, that is, even if some referendums are held in the kherson region in zaporizhzhia, relatively speaking, there are 90% in favor of joining russia, it is legally impossible to issue it, it must be done first it is logical to create a people's republic, it is first to create a people's republic and then hold a referendum or join this territory, then the already existing pseudo-republics should unite with the luhansk and donetsk service, but this must also happen, that is, there should still be two referendums, and i will show you that you can create a republic without one of any referendum. do you remember any referendum in the dpr chinner on the creation of republics, or

do you know about the referendum on the creation of an independent state of crimea no, it is being done by some people's assemblies that meet in an unknown place and say that we now have kherson oblast and kherson people's republic, or that kherson oblast joins luhansk people's republic as an autonomous region and joins the russian federation together with it. we didn't even know that you would enter, but they came out. what a strange coincidence of our desires, well, that is, but still, something has to happen, nothing like that is happening, and i think that firstly, they could be unsure of their military success, and secondly they could also regard it as an element of blackmail, here we will take over the kherson region and then we will trade, we will hold a referendum there, and you do not want them to join well, so crimea is water for crimea . of these plans in this case i know only one most important thing that in order to somehow gain control over the possibilities of joining

the territory it must be made an independent state in other options the legislation of the russian federation i don't foresee, well, when we talk about elections, yes , it would be good to come to other changes in the field, well , changes in the policies of other countries, for example, great britain, there is generally a very interesting period, now a new era is happening . the king and the new premier-lis trassr in my life there will still be new premiers of great britain, but there will never be a queen, practically how she will be remembered in the whole world to me, just a queen as such can only be a king all all the next three

the heirs to the british throne are men and i have no physical chance of surviving even two of them and not four of them, because the prince of venezuela is the youngest of the land, even if you imagine that he will become an instant king in 20 years, you can see what kind of genes king charles iii has in vince can live as long as his match, but still prince william. i won't survive anymore and i will only think that maybe prince george will have a daughter and she will become a queen someday. in this case, you can calculate the future for a long time . consider that we are lucky that we gave birth in the era of the british queen. few people lived in the era of british kings. so, in general, men were on the

british throne, as a rule, for the most part, and this tradition is what has now been restored by queen elizabeth ii for 70 years. the problem is that stalin was practically alive in the soviet union. the united states of america was coming to the end of the era of harry truman, the era was beginning, let's go zinhaur, it's very old, churchill was the prime minister of great britain, the first prime minister of the queen, this is a very old era. and by the way, it seems to me that many people underestimate the importance of the institution here i see that when people wonder why the british say goodbye to a dwarf, because she did not rule the state at all, she never made any political statements, no statements , because the son will not develop his

character, you know, he really wants to take everything participation, we know this, listen to the person who was the first to compare putin to the light, do you remember that no politician has ever said such words, he said in 2014, putin is doing the same thing as hitler, this means that king charles the third has political consciousness and principles, and this is a lot about what does it say , and don't forget one more important thing, that the father was accepted by the king through the third, the late duke of hamburg was generally a greek prince, he was orthodox, believe the story, and you can say that he brought his eldest son to this parts of culture prince chas restores monasteries in the background meets with non

-russian orthodox priests interested in orthodox culture at his wedding there were orthodox icons he always said that he wanted to visit sophia of the kyiv pechergov lavra it seems he was even there once very briefly when he visited kyiv at the invitation of president kuchma that is, elizabeth did not have any of this. it was her husband with king charles the third - it is, but i will not answer about it, i am talking about something that is very important, the british are proud of the royal family precisely as an institution why because there is an institution of moral authority, each country builds this institution differently in the united states, we say it is not the president of the united states, the president of the united states manages the administration, but the moral institution of the country is the supreme court of the united states, why the election of each president

perceived precisely as a chance to change the composition of the supreme court because the judge is actually acquired for life and from whoever will be the president, a democrat through a publican, taking into account the age of the members of the supreme court it depends on how the civilization of the united states will develop in the next not five but 25 years ago, the republican victory before trump was so important because she knew that there would be a renewal of the court and if there is now a democrat president for them, it will be very big problems for them from the point of view of their principles, it was important to them that the president is a republican, whoever appointed the members of the supreme court is america's moral authority for such countries as, say, germany, as ireland, i don't know there, iceland to a certain extent, poland is possible even speak "."

but you have to be impeccable in this position, because

if the pressure was met by some putin and was friends with lavrov and did some wrong political actions, what kind of moral authority are you in the nation? and apologies, but for such countries as britain, belgium , norway, or sweden, this role of moral authority is played by the monarch, and the extent to which the monarch is able to play this role depends on this, the strength of state institutions, not the electoral role it is given to a person by the right of birth. but at the same time, a person by the right to give birth is not given the right to influence politics, and that is why this traditional mission is related to the fact that a person should symbolize the

stability of state institutions of all, the state is stable despite any political crises, therefore that even if there is a crazy political economic crisis, the monarch remains like this, they said, as the rock on which britain is built, britain is a complex country, it has serious problems, energy, economic, political relations are complex between england and scotland in northern ireland, this is the way it is , and everyone who is interested in british political and social life understands how complicated it all is, how serious ambitions there are, even in every party . under the pressure of associates, boris johnson overthrew terezumey, then associates overthrew boris johnson, he managed to get elected, but it is not known what will happen next, this is a fierce struggle, if you see how

the debates are taking place in the public palace it's simple, they just fight wall to wall, this can be called real democracy, the question is what is needed so that there is no anarchy in the location, moral authority is needed, you are fighting so much and where is this whole process, but at any moment when you reach an agreement, the prime minister leaves to the queen or now to the king and gets the right to appoint, everything will happen as it has always happened, the tradition of the institution will be preserved with full observance of all the rules, which means that the law will work without reprimand, because it follows from all this if you want the stability of the law, then why is british law respected all over the world and why are russian oligarchs tried in british courts?

well, because they trust, but this trust must be based on something, and i will say right away that i believe that it is based precisely on this power of state institutions or the british call it a tradition, i would prefer to call it precisely the stability of state institutions, traditions in britain were different, there were kings who, to put it mildly, did not want to share power with anyone, but the modern british bring the monarchy from the great charter of freedoms, too, the new world, i am honestly trying to explain that in the 19th century, the great charter of freedoms was not talked about so often, they talked about some other things about the monarch as an emperor. victoria was an empress, not just a queen, and the british were very it is important that the great empire and when britain became a small european country, this opinion appeared on the islands, and what does the monarch symbolize the great charter of freedoms, because

since a thousand years ago, milk has been said, the monk said that he will be equal to his subjects, that he will be respected to respect his subjects at a time when his birthright seems to give him the right to disrespect, to the possibility of not reckoning with them, and it must be said that from this point of view, queen elizabeth ii, why do they treat this e- she was british, she was an ordinary person, closed enough, cold enough, calm enough, you didn't know that, and they started calling her grandma when simply because a person is already 96 years old, but she never gave the impression of a grandmother who bakes some cakes there just a respectable right, barely, but she treated people with respect, this respect was felt. yes, it is distance, but distance is also respect to a certain extent. i always believed that when a person who is endowed with

power starts addressing someone as you, this already shows disrespect for people and for oneself by the way, i have to tell you that you are from their own life experience, that mikhail gorbachev, he told everyone. you told people who were in their 80s. you are there for me, a boy who i have boyfriends who were in their 20s or russians who behaved much more, i would say in a royal way than mikhail gorbachev, he simply behaves like him because he is a russian cameraman. he has never been anyone in his life. whom were you talking about? it was a distance. i met him. where did he say you sit down ? and never in my life have i heard even a hint of you, and it seems to me that no one ever you don't know anything at all with whom he was talking to you, but at this distance at the same time there was respect, you understood that you usually communicate with the president of russia, but this president of russia does not consider you a slave, he does not poke you go and bring it to the cha, it is obvious that there is something inside him it was one thing to treat people, but this was the attitude that i

remembered. i don't think that many politicians in russia behave like that here, too. it's just that it's related to etiquette and manners . in the medieval sense of the word, and i would say the contemporaries of the monarch, the people with whom the monarch speaks in a very human way, this was worked out, by the way, everything in the elizabethan era happened when the tongue went to the miners in the place suffered from the disaster when she communicated with this simple people, for her, as a person, i was brought up in an aristocratic environment, all this was. believe me, you know very well how it is not easy to communicate in another environment, although we do not have such small uh, let's say failure in environments like the queen of great britain, for her it is it's just another world, people just speak in english

, which she could not understand very well. and how can you develop like that? do you hear what the royal english language is? everyone is confused when they hear elizaveta chechenze's address, how is it possible to do so? to speak in english, well, only they are the only ones. it seems to me that they speak like that in the whole world, but this is also very important. you see how you stand. i think that the best example of how a person relates to his duties is not each of us has such courage. to be honest, here's to you 96 years old, it is difficult to imagine what a person will become, you die, you lie under some kind of drip, a class when a person has a temperature of 37.3, she no longer understands why she has to go somewhere, well, it is logical, a person is simple, but here it is a state of a completely different nature, it is a state when life bets are more important because this is your job, you can't not do it, no one will do

it for you, and this is a huge respect for the ceremony and the law. do you understand that if the queen could n't do it, she didn't decide that she couldn't, well, the person feels bad everyone understands let's postpone this church and then the queen died now there is no government what well remains the previous prime minister it's all dragging on and it's not working effectively anyway i don't even think the queen thought she would die in 48 hours she just knew that she had to get up and fulfill her duty and how bad she was. it is clear from the fact that the meeting of the privy council, which was supposed to be the final of the appointment of prime ministers, was rarely canceled here already in the evening, she could not physically do anything, she had enough for this meeting on these few photos are , well, and then the news actually started to appear

that the queen is not feeling well, that her relatives are coming to her, er, the next day, well, practically yes . archive from politics a politician can feel bad, can resign, can do anything for a monarch from the sentence this is treason in the city, that is, many monarchs abdicate in europe when power is handed over to children , this is also widespread, but until the moment you believe that you have to fulfill your duties, you you perform in any weather in great britain, it is not often sunny. we saw how under what rain all these arrivals of the queen 's children and grandchildren took place at bolmaral. and by the way, i thought that i thought that for the first time in the history of great britain, the country is governed two elizabeths, but it continued for 48 hours, it also

turns out to be very symbolic, and now there is a forest of tracks, too, they probably never thought that she would become the last premiere of elizabeth of the tracks and the first premiere of chelsea, that is also a role in history, you know how they say now that from churchill to tracks, this is the era of elizabeth ii and now a new era is starting from tracks and so they will subconsciously compare churchill with others and you know that because of this is the only person , in fact, during all these times after the death of the father of elizabeth ii, king herg, who was worthy ceremonies of the state march of the state guard no one else has such prominent political figures of great britain, mangartich, this is how others are known there as lorn batman, a close relative

of the queen who was killed in northern and southern ireland, they were never buried using the procedure of a state march, the queen's father was the lion king and there was winston churchill, now there will be the third such ceremony since 1952, by the way, you mentioned margaret thatcher, and now listraz is often compared to her, or is it appropriate to say so well, the forest really wants to be like margaret thatcher there is absolutely logic in this margaret thatcher is an example of leadership and this is an example of such leadership when you stop thinking what is usually absolutely i think it is inappropriate to think about women politicians oh she is a woman she has achieved this this is a different type of leadership because i i saw a photo recently when on margaret thatcher's 70th birthday, she and the queen are walking side by side

, talking about something, these two, you know, in such beautiful hairstyles, smiling, confident as elizabeth can be confident and as can be margarita is sure that such a moment is a triumph, i'm 70 years old, i'm a lady, let's come, queen of queens, this is also a truffle moment, i can go to whoever i want, that's why she came, although it's clear that she has a lot of things in herself. she's thinking about herself . denis thatcher of duchessburg men are usually in such photos men are always in the foreground here they are obviously in the second but it does not even raise questions why are they in the second as why because this is margaret the realization flows and the friend where all the others do not matter men, aren't they men and should be in the background because this is such a duo? well, of course, i really want to be a part of this approach of such continuity, i myself would be, uh, i would like to be like vargar tech. if i were the prime minister

of great britain, but to what extent it will be possible . you understand that this is already a question of historical rolling in great britain now, there are exactly the same economic problems as in great britain during the times of margaret thatcher and the first period, if the rhinestone forest somehow manages to cope with these problems, i and sincerely i wish this because i love great britain, it is just a beautiful country and for me it is an example of freedom, these people are free in their perception of the world and because i like the forest as a politician i think she is an interesting politician and i just wish that great britain, despite the fact that i am not a supporter of brexit, but illustras was not a supporter of brexit, as you know, they coped with those problems and took their place. these problems are economic, and if she succeeds

, well, then she will succeed in winning the next parliamentary elections, she will become the second margaret thatcher. if she does not succeed, she will become the second teresa of miy, because there is still land needed, besides, you know, everyone wants to be like margaret thatcher, but as a result, it turns out that you similar to a trident and reins, also a serious politician, a person with a brilliant career, but it was not possible to cope with it, a very difficult period is now in the history of great britain, no one is able to cope with the problem of ani terezimei ani boris johnson and everyone warned that the period after brexit will be so turbulent, this is a turbulent period, the great british politicians will be the one who can quell this turbulence, but it is clear that uh, you see a forest of tracks, this is a determined person, how did she talk to lavrov in moscow in you in general, how does she speak about russia, she does not choose expressions , she is the same there, for example,

they said to the president of france that it is not clear to us, our friend, maniel macron , whether they like it or not, bory johnson is a person who is more likely to use such pathos, maybe it is because he is like you and i are a journalist. he likes the image of the word forest. taras is completely different from herself. she behaves exactly like a politician. she speaks harshly . there is no room for metaphors. either you are with us or you didn’t know, and that’s all. by the way, it can reduce opportunities for maneuver, but in principle, it gives an opportunity to say who is who, then can it be assumed that passion has risen, for example, support for ukraine will be even more radical, in any case, it will be no less, in any case, the forest together will be able to organize a dialogue with it. to understand that biden and johnson are people from completely different worlds and this could certainly affect communication, i think that support for ukraine will

increase, of course, because you understand that the forest once can see in this as well as the swamp johnson a political place for bolis johnson, the war in ukraine - it was a war of values ​​because he understood it perfectly for the forest once, and here it must be said right away that both politicians are responsible for what we need british society . in principle, i think that the forest once will behave more rigidly because, unlike boris johnson, she is guided by historical parallels, and reality is reality. she sometimes precedes historical parallels because it is also very important and this is now the moment of such a specific concrete policy. well, plus we have to remember that god johnson i really wanted the chandelier to win the election, i'll tell you more, if god johnson didn't want it so much, the rotation could now be a completely different prime minister, johnson's support this was one of the decisive moments of the victory of the forest do you already remember that when the british

parliamentarians voted, strasne was the first, she was not the winner of the struggle in her faction, but when the ordinary members of the conservative party interfered in the affairs, well, why would you vote for whom did they push the decision, or at all stress, well , it is obvious that outside the city and so many people, if you understand, we looked at this whole story, there were interesting candidates, ms. mcdown, who now heads the privy council, but if we were given a vote, we understand perfectly well the people who voted for her, we really understand their intentions and pains, johnson played on this to prevent those people who were the reason for his resignation from the post of prime minister from coming to power, this is also a very important point. well, in principle, we have come to such a logical conclusion to our discussion this week because in fact, less than a minute remains, all we have to do is pass the baton to our news team, yes, the

information service of the espresso tv channel is ready to present the big final news release, we have prepared a lot of interesting things for you, and vitaly and i portnikov panasyuk, we will say goodbye to you until next week, let's hope that next week will be no less. i would say that there are more names of liberated ukrainian cities than this one, and this is what we sincerely wish you, friends, this saturday evening, thank you, thank you, ulyana, discussions