i bet she committed acts of goodwill and to whom they leave the church. we are simply talking about the future , which turned out to be not only optimistic and so beneficial for us that it was really very difficult to predict for him. at first some because the troops are moving faster than it was possible to imagine in principle that's why everything turned out as it should have been and about the event in the kherson region, you know even if it looks like the specific weight of the scraps disposed of in this direction is not the same as big as in kharkiv. but there are qualitative losses for the gunners. well, for example, yesterday our artillery destroyed the h4 wedge-block large-caliber guns of the pion gunners, which have a caliber of 203 mm and can shoot at a distance of 40 km. this is simply an incredible success of our gunners. so how is it somehow too

early to talk about that in the kherson region nothing is happening there in the kherson region, positive changes are accumulating, which will also come after the goodwill campaign, let's just record it in full thus, see as far as i understand today it was confirmed, there is a lot of tension in donetsk region, to what extent will ukraine be able to contain kyiv there, or can we lose something there again, how do you imagine it ? so it's not that we can lose something there, but the russians and the prospects of a cascade collapse of defense. what about this front line. because the russians were russians, the russians needed kupyansk in order to deliver ammunition and other resources for the troops that were concentrated well, let's say so on the newly captured

territories of luhansk region and donetsk region, and the railway passes through cooking - it was such a single route to feed the troops concentrated on these areas, it turns out that the russians lost kupyansk from khm, in principle, they were generally forced to retreat from kharkiv region, respectively, the troops in the north of donetsk region and in principle, let's say in donetsk region itself, they were left without such a significant channel of logistics, that's why, for example, such an interesting linguistic case comes out that uh, there are two teachings of the institute. he does not says that on the one hand, the exit of the reshes from kharkiv region is a very important and strategically important step, but how important it is that even now it is difficult to assess, that is why the russians can now try to exert pressure by what they throw there, you know, in waves, their aromatic meat can try to finish off the stocks there, the remnants of their ammunition that they have in this direction , after all, god, the episode when the russians tried to get our convoys in the kharkiv region by shooting these

self-propelled flamethrowers, so one pinocchio there on it didn’t work out for the kharkiv voroshists, and i think that now, especially in the state of how badly the rashis have been defeated, our troops will be able to get on these borders, which mr. ivan is now. not since - until the evening there is already less left because the pace of the soup is simply incredible in this direction, of course i am worried about how after all the military experts said and you also need armored vehicles for counteroffensive aviation lied again. i'm telling you, they're lying constantly, they're giving us something, well, come on , they didn't give us anything. but we've already reached the border. the

operational and strategic skill of the general staff of the armed forces of ukraine, well, that is, the command was pushed . well, probably they themselves did not expect that their actions would have only a high result, so let's remember once again that you and i, mr. mykola, can make claims that we have reshaped society, but to be sure, hmm , commander-in-chief trilushny came along with general zaborotskyi literally in advance, that is, they published an article that we not only predicted that the war would continue and 2023 was chosen there, oh, i'm afraid they are lying again, so here is the money. in the izyum direction, the money makers agreed that in the next year they can also try to advance there in the izyum direction and it turns out

, that is, you know. mr. ivan, i'm sorry, mr. ivan, thank you." they close entry to their countries for russians for tourist, cultural, sports and business purposes , they will implement changes to counter direct threats

to public order and security, but i have the second the sentence is even very worrying. will it now be some kind of special responsibility for the russians who are there with their flags in europe? it will be very simple there. i think it is a ban. they were given a simplified visa regime . well, they didn't give a certain percentage, but now everything will be the other way around. that is, you have to be some kind of absolute hero to be given a visa, and right there it says business, that is, a businessman does not pass, but an artist is a business, an artist is a business, it is his business and work is his business, and when you read it carefully, you understand that just nobody. well,

navalny can escape from prison , that's why i don't see any good news for russians, in principle, because this is when they wrote a tourist cultural, sports, business, well, i think that everything is like that, now we can ask petras and ostreichus in more detail. but uh , i have a suspicion that i might be wrong, but i have a suspicion that this is basically a bow, the gate of the decision, which is from the 19th, that i was only explaining my point of view to my colleagues, that this was an exception before when they did not give

a visa in the main they gave and now there will be an exception that they will give a visa, in fact this is a ban and if your surname is , for example, navalny or koramurza, yes, there are some famous people, okay, we will give you a visa, but if you are just an athlete, such is the second, third , 10 and fifth, then we will give you a visa i will not give correctly i understand what the europeans are going to do, i have to explain that the baltic countries, specifically, lithuania has basically stopped issuing visas since spring . yes, i don't remember exactly what month it was, but i think it was april. minimum when in principle we have already stopped issuing visas because our consular office there and in russia has already decreased in number and there was no one to

work there and there was a political decision that, you know , we have to stop with visas because... a war is a war, and we must look at it seriously now er, the solution to which er, the ministers of foreign affairs of the european union said yes, er, the ministers of foreign affairs of the european union - this is the removal of the simplified visa regime with russia, this means, in principle, that er, the price increases from 35 € to 80, and more various documents are required for proof and why so you want to go to the schengen area, what kind of business do you have there? well, of course, the issuance process itself will be uh. well, i would say that if before, they probably issued it. быть и месяц yes and eh will be checked already eh seryoznoe are the same reasons. why is a citizen of

the russian federation wanting to go to the schengen zone? yes, there are probably countries that will apply very sensitive control. i will increase the number of such countries. bolshe but of course there will be countries that eh will look at this as tourist trips let's say south southern countries of the european union greece italy spain probably specifically they will probably issue eh exactly eh well try to issue as many visas as possible i don't know how much they will not listen to commissioner johansson, who i said, but such a thing can happen, which means that on the topic of those who will receive a schengen visa to greece, they can try to go through the baltic countries because i, if i

look like that -е geographically. so, in principle, it is possible to get into the european union by car only through the baltic countries and through poland, well, there is also through finland, but it is more expensive there , and further, and so on, and the finns, in my opinion, will also check more carefully, which means that those have, let's say, a greek or spanish visa by car, they want to drive around europe, and imagine they are coming to the belarusian-lithuanian border and there they will be told no because we are not only stopping the issue ourselves, the entire issue was issued how are you correct they said that there is someone named navalny karamurze and some other position holder or journalist. yes, these people will be let in, but those who eat with simple hungarian visas, we will try to do everything so that they do not enter lithuania, that is, into the zone

shrigena eh i have already heard that there are also eh voices of eh dissatisfaction khod well how do we apply such measurements here but we have explanations - it is in eh in the interests of national security i think that we have a very solid argument thank you very much, this is me. well, i was not always a bully in my childhood. when i was still in school, i thought that there was a lot of people in ukraine. could not live peacefully while killing of our fellow citizens and destroying our country, the savior of the european parliament from lithuania. sorry, the program must end. thank you. lithuania, yes. we

are going interactive. activities also on youtube and on our youtube channel espresso.tv in the live chat, so let's start and the first question, of course, concerns such a topic of the week in the international arena. what do you think, sir mykola how will the united kingdom change after the death of queen elizabeth ii, it will change for sure , absolutely, because i already saw it, i watched carefully how the new king charles greeted people and what i saw was usually before him in her majesty elizabeth, women always did knicks, no one i did

that step forward into the future yes, well, before it was the norm and where is the queen when she shakes hands, men are very like that and they also have some kind of song, well , according to tradition, women bow down, does this mean or does it mean that he is not respected no, it is not, it is not this not tradition and disrespect. it's just him. do you understand the essence of the problems that exist with the queen? they were that she kept a closed monarchy. if the princes of the wives of the ukrainians of sweden in denmark and spain behaved like that, well, everyone knows that. they live like an ordinary family . it could be treason, it could be it, it could be this, it could be that because the british were in anarchy, they came to the covenant, it was quite closed , so everything that came out of there, oh, i

wrote a lot about it in the 90s, and that was if i was interested and engaged in and and and in short everything and it was very well i like it i liked it there, i remember sarah ferguson - this is the wife of prince andrew, for the first time he introduced rog to him and it was such a scandal in britain that, well, all of charles. by the way, i sat at the same table with him among those i knew, well, they didn't they remember for sure, but it's charles and anna, tell me how it was. it's so interesting. in the 90s, there were days of britain in kyiv. in kyiv, it was the soviet union, so we decided that there would be some events in kyiv aimed at well, if they were widespread information about great britain then for the first time the bbc crossed the border into the soviet union because i

had already cooperated with them, they invited me to work here in kyiv, and she was visiting the exhibition, we were at the exhibition there at the vdnkh, our office was there, we were making radio programs there, and she came. they came in white shirts. yes, that’s because they really have these traditions, and i say, “why are you so pretentious ?” i say, “well, the bark will pass.” on the queen and the princess, and then, somewhere in the 90s, he was late, and he was late because he went to see bulgakov, he is absolutely a lover of bulgakov, and when the discussion began here that bulgakov is a bad writer, someone will ask me. i say well, maybe i have

bad taste, because i always liked to talk a lot. so, in general, the queen herself is a desperately big figure, we can't even imagine what's more, we can't imagine her role, we constantly think about these phrases, the kingdom is not ruling, you know what she still has, she has never used this right, and she may still not submit the prime minister it is true that i am the queen, well, now the king will be the balance between the parliament and the government, in fact, everything is written very clearly in the country, but she could just i'm against i don't like, i don't want to have a country prime minister bezprzyj explains that she won't be but she has powers, it's just a reduction

of powers, it's a voluntary kingdom in the king, they limited themselves, limited, limited , limited, and that's it. she just never did it herself. she had 15 examples. she always agreed with everyone, moreover, she is careful, she understands that there are republics there who don't like monarchs and so on and there is a big debate why should we spend on obtaining u then someone starts mentioning that we spend on its maintenance but it brings so much publicity every year such number of billions because people buy scarves with the image of a cup it's a huge number of businesses involved and we get more than we spend on keeping the royal family shorter there's a lot of debate but when you just start to understand who she saw who with yes from stalin to the

beatles from the astronauts who gagarin was the first to go into space before neil, who was the first to stand on the moon, she is everyone's foot, and the second is very important. they know how many days off the queen had, how many one a year. she did not work on christmas, december 24 once a year she does not work, she takes a vacation, she eats every morning of the premiere, a red suitcase and a red boat for the queen, and everything that happens there, including intelligence, is the most secret, she probably knows all the spies, and in short, the amount of knowledge is huge and she works all day she has her own documents , her advisors are her own, if they can, they are close to this now, there is a privy council there, this is all this, and she works, this is a unique person in general, and two

people in britain know absolutely everything, this is the prime minister and the same suitcase is lucky every morning and your majesty and she every day morning about review calls connect i will say that i have a personal grief well, it is not such a grief, i wanted to write her a letter for 12 years she answers to everyone well, not she, but she is, of course, people who, that is, anyone if if just no i didn't have an idea i wanted to somehow thank britain because my first job at the bbc is somehow related to britain and like no other i was not a journalist i did not graduate from the journalism faculty but then i became interested i would do it and i even asked my friends to take it i want to write why because i wanted to thank

i think i should thank thatcher because i started working for her when she was prime minister but then i worked successor thatcher successor successor thatcher in short that's all i think and to whom can i write a letter of thanks well then the option is to write go well, who is the queen? well, she's really good , she didn't die for a long time, she waited for my letter, she kept waiting. well, i can't, well, how much longer should i wait, and i had such a shock, it's an interesting life . the idea that this is such fun, fun comes to mind. and if you don't want to fly. and you have plans to go to africa, it's not a bad taxi. i drove 100 m and got out, but under the sights of the cameras, always be dressed. well, the main question is whether

her courage is safe. and power, everyone remembers, i don’t know here, they know about it in ukraine, they don’t know that a criminal once entered her bedroom and sat down, i think i would die there from fear, if i thought someone would cut the bedroom, she would sit down, absolutely nothing had changed, i went to talk to him understood minutes 15 while he was distracted what did we press on the button for the security guards to come she asked him to mean, well, there is no, not to do anything so bad with him there, then safely , some things are related to the prosecutor's office there, probably well, what about sneaking into the bedroom of the queen in the okhnikov palace i just went up there to the third floor somehow , i mean, i’m sitting on the bed straight and i’m talking to the king who is talking to the queen, but she ’s always everything, never wait, i’m there, never apologize, never ask, that’s one thing has faded

well, i was definitely worried. i wore such an ink or purple, well, such a color. i found it in myself. i was in kyiv when she died and went to the embassy to put flowers and these flowers . » of a certain transformation in 14 countries of the world where the head of government is changing there is a head of state the head of government they have one state yes the head of state they are queens now the king automatically this political

somehow affects i don't think practically not at all practically not at all i would i i i once knew the general of canada, and this is just the representative of the queen, the general-brador - he does not decide anything ceremonially and exclusively, and so on, but i think that charles will simply go even further in opening the monarchy in the normalization of the monarchy to the level of ordinary people , he understands this. i think he is very he is an intelligent person, judging by what i read and when we were there in the 90s , i listened to him just at the table alone, i think that he will open up little by little, he will be very careful, but he, how to say it, says that our friends in russia are kind, that is, there surprises can arise and it definitely won't be like elizabeth ii

it will be completely different he won't be as careful as she he won't be ever again the formula is very simple in england the palace thinks there they never pronounce the word elizabeth palace some kind of abstraction the palace said the palace commented the palace there is something there there is a palace i think that well i think that he learned well listen he waited for many years well i think that he did not wait he would like his mother to live and further but i think that there will be changes which i do not know, but there will be changes for sure because he he is really a more open person, he is not young anymore, he is 73-74 years old. he is married to his beloved wife, whom he loved even before diana, before diana, he is her goal. so, i think that we

will beat something, i do not include what he is in kyiv will come. i absolutely do not include him. he is just the kind of person who can come during the war. well, he was the first of the oppressed people to say that putin is like hitler back in the 14th, and this also seems to me to be a sign that not only the forest will come, it will also come for sure. sure, but it will be a bomb under putin's eye it's not matyuk, it's true, it's possible. well, slava, how is this the letter of les podervyansky, ask him, he knows all the literary ones, he's matyuk, but i don't know, so the next question, russia lost the war with chechnya, how will it cope with ukraine? no, i think that's not the question that losing the question is what does victory look like russia must be destroyed the ideal

option foreign troops in the capital of russia moscow i hope that it will be joint ukrainian-american troops and a parade on red square because if there remains ot such an embryo is in five years for 10 for 50 for 100 it will happen again, i'm telling you, it's such an absurdity , the 90s it's just an excuse to forget the country had nothing, just give money, give food, give bush's legs, give disposable syringes, give give it give it called i read it myself putin yeltsin calls clinton and asks clinton to ask the king of saudi arabia for a couple of three billion because western siberia will die there as soon as the oil prices rise, they all grabbed god by the beard

that's why we need to come up with something like that well, chechnya will be the civil war in chechnya for some time, i think because all contributions are against kadyrov, half or not because he killed their relatives, and according to chechen laws , if you demand birth, i will kill your relative, that is, the options are that it was without without without war, i will not even it is impossible to imagine this, and it will go on. the chain reaction will be shorter, despite the fact that they do not have a war, despite the fact that they do not have bombed-out houses, cities, towns, villages, ukraine's prospects are much better despite our sacrifice.

years, definitely from two countries, in russia or in ukraine , despite the fact that everything is fine there. i would say that it is definitely in ukraine, but when, for a minute, not soon, it’s not soon, it’s true that they spent the winter abroad before, but now they’ve already fled. no, it will be somewhere it will happen if, if the destruction of the fronts continues, then it can happen unexpectedly very quickly and a collapse is a collapse, what mr. avangar is a cascade of engagement at the front. so far, it is not there , but judging by everything, it can happen at any moment, and i am absolutely convinced that not only sober thinking, and even thinking stupidly, the russians at the top next to putin already understand this and need to save themselves from another option, just a moment, we will

uncork the champagne and let this moment soon be a little bit like a dream. thank you very much, mykola september. company, but during the week we will bore you with the next song and in a few moments iryna koval with news meet