with those fire ramparts that they made at the beginning of this war, they mean the active phase, well , our war is not 200 days, our war is in the 14th year, but the active phase is really 200 days, so they no longer have such resources in order to win back the question now is to what extent they will be able to stop , turn around, prepare a defense, well, let's not say so, in the direction in which we have now shaken them in the kharkiv region, i have great doubts in the kherson region, there is a rather large grouping. i think that there we must use a shaft of fire ourselves because the russians are now static there, and we are moving , therefore, in this situation, we are in a slightly more favorable position with regard to the use of artillery, the achievement of artillery parity is still a long way off, but nevertheless we already have a fairly good amount of this , and the accuracy of these means compensates for their possible lack of any therefore, the kherson direction. i think we will have nightmares and let it be changed that

it will not be possible to escape and attract . in the context in which they would like, they didn't get it, i'm talking about the kherson direction, but as for the donetsk direction, well, let's talk frankly, there is a fairly powerful group. we will certainly give them a nightmare there. they go there again and so on, the question of the luhansk direction will also now be swayed due to the fact that, firstly, the ordinians will flee to russia, and the russian soldiers will be even more demoralized as a result the only thing that will hinder us quite a lot is the private military companies and the mercenaries who are on contracts, not the contractors of the russian armed forces, and it is the mercenaries who will give us, as they say , create problems for the next year. well, the most

important thing is that i think so after all, the issue of the split of the group in order to close mariupol, as they say there, but how is it in order to have the opportunity to take them into the operational environment, well, this issue is quite difficult. well, let's say it right here, we can analyze we need means for this, we need knowledge of m.m. materials, what kind of intelligence we have and so on, here i am already commenting a little, well, i will refrain because she can speak. and people in our country sometimes, when they listen, say that this will happen soon, and then they say and what it didn't happen, and then there will definitely be someone from the civilian who will say why the military is fighting so badly, why haven't they liberated mariupol yet, do we have december there or october there? ihor, the officer of the landslide, is specially appointed, this is the people's deputy of ukraine, 8th convocation, ihor lapin, we were on the phone, and we continue the discussion of this

military strategy and the consequences of our offensive against the russians with ihor romanenko, the former deputy chief of the general staff of the armed forces of ukraine. congratulations, mr. ihor, i congratulate you. let's just give you the results from this direction of our offensive in the kharkiv direction and let 's try to understand the prospects in the kherson region. i would say that first we need to return to how these conditions and to understand what started in the kherson direction. and now what is happening in the kharkiv direction is happening, that is, a few weeks ago, thanks to the first statement, and it was the leadership of the supreme command, that in relation to the liberation of kherson and around the e-e lands, a

corresponding group began to form on our side but it was also a turning point. if the moment of the son-in-law initiative was strategic, it was the armed forces of ukraine that russia would have to react. and they, for their part , began to form e-e groupings, but not for defense, but as for the organization of the offensive, and there accordingly, the troops were formed and transferred . and when this happened, i would like to draw attention to the fact that about 15,000 of the troops of the russian federation were removed from the donetsk region and 10,000 of the regional raisin were transferred to the kherson region and the zaporizhzhia region. that is, they were forced to react in some way and they reacted thus, after that,

our troops did not wait for any action on the part of the formations of the russian group, and on the 29th, as is known, they began an offensive, it was several days of the offensive of a significant release of the relevant inhabited by putin in the kherson direction and uh, but uh, our troops went on the defensive, but defensively. i agree with my colleague. it was a maneuver defense and the russians concentrated their forces right here, and at that time there was no price, but the direction of action of the armed forces was prepared in advance of ukraine in kharkiv and unexpected for the enemy, at first it was possible to assess that these were asynchronous actions, that is, they would not have additionally struck

at different places a in the kharkiv direction in order to repel part of the enemy's forces, but as it turned out later, when they advanced successfully and effective conduct of offensive actions that this direction is very important , units of part of the armed forces of ukraine advanced from 50 kilometers forward and were freed and de-occupied such places as upiansk, kupyansk and e vyshkoy on raisin. i am joining specialists here and they talked about the fact that the supply route of the logistics group at one time was the largest in the district raisin was precisely provided by this if the logisticians were russian crabs

around kupyansk there were railways there highways and the russians, e-e, without railways, effective logistical support. the sums are being destroyed, and they thus ensured the supply of weapons, equipment, personnel, e, in fact, the entire group in the eastern operational zone. now this is over for them, and for e-e, it is of great importance. they are trying to find some reserves in order to stop the advance of our e-e part of the units in the directions, and not only to vovchansk and martove, they released our and directions in the donetsk direction, this is the estuary and

to luhansk lisichansk, all this is very important, and that is why this line of actions, if asymmetric, became one of the main ones, although we must not forget that heavy battles are taking place in the eastern part of the operational zone , meaning kramatorsk-slovyansk bakhmut avdeevka, that is, heavy defensive battles are taking place here battles on the part of the armed forces of ukraine and the corresponding actions we have already talked about in the kherson direction, but at the current time the field situation is developing in this way, what is the strategic significance of these e-e achievements of the ukrainian armed forces in the near future because this is the question that foreign military experts are asking now, that these are of course huge achievements, but how can these achievements be transformed into further advancement of strategic

importance, the interception of the strategic optics initiative, we started the discussion with you from this, and when it started, when we were forced to mean forced russians to regroup from their forces, and some in that direction. we were preparing, that is, we shifted to the south and took the direction of kharkiv, you and uh, well, if possible, our now settled ones concentrated and energetic actions led to those achievements and effective actions that we are now seeing, that is, i consider it my point of view that at the present time er and this is the first and second that we are now forced to conduct various types of er military operations, that is, on the one hand, defensive

heavy fighting is taking place, it means in the eastern operational zone on the other side, it means that the offensive action of advancing to the border has begun effectively, and it means that paraska has been applied for the supply route of kupyansk izyum in kharkiv oblast, and the code of the offensive actions continue, but from everything, maneuver transitions, offensive defenses in the kherson direction, where we continue to strike at warehouses in the logistical way of supplying resident pontoons, crossings , we strike at the management structures of this group, it is quite difficult, the length of the front is about 1,000 km . what is important in these conditions is the reaction to a change in the

situation, and we see that our war, the political leadership, er, is doing it quite effectively , at the same time. and tell me, in principle, er, you do you feel at all who is in charge of the military operations ? is it the military? is it the chekists? because sometimes i get the impression that this is a special operation for the war plus a special operation is being discussed, as you know , by the russian side, but lately they have been talking about the fact that they went for the e- before the alarm is somehow explained as six months into the special operation , the date of the transition to the anti-terrorist operation, and well, until recent times when they say that it is during the grouping, all that is happening in the kharkiv direction, but the slow actions are explained by their big

with a humanitarian component in the name of preserving the lives of the ukrainian population well, here in general, we know the propagandistic approaches, how they are, how they are big in the quotes of humanitarianism, how they are implemented in the occupied part of our territory , and now this is confirmed already in the kharkiv direction for the liberation of the settlement, such actions russians, in principle, attempts by the russian military to divert the attention of the ukrainian army from those directions in which the return of our territory is currently taking place are possible. well, let's say try to strike from someone else, well, they are carrying out actions with this , that is, actions in the east of these areas, which we briefly talked

about ... on the other hand , they are gathering reserves in order to stop the advance of our troops in the kharkiv direction . but there are problems there, we need to ford the rivers eh, that means break the bridges, pontoons, crossings eh, our intelligence imagines them, the artery is striking, it is quite difficult eh, the execution of this kind of tasks but they are trying to do it now. in principle, how much do you expect the russians to admit their defeats in the war because we see it now? they try to pass each defeat off as some kind of good will or regrouping of troops, and even yesterday a salute was held in moscow, while everyone was talking about the situation that was connected with the

russians' loss of the occupied cities in the kharkiv region, do you generally believe that one day the russians will begin to honestly say that they will be defeated on ukrainian soil, this is possible only when it changes to my the view of this regime moreover, the regime with a red flag on the structure is more democratic in the western perception of this situation and this management structure that can and should be for the state, what should be expected now, er, this is nonsense, we can see from the way they behaved and are behaving now a- but it is necessary to make sure even in the action who is already konashenkove, well, by the way, which has nothing to do with this at all in the military case, but prapradiysky talks about what is happening and they were forced, er, in his face, to give

information about it, justify it as well as you they talked about regrouping eh well, maybe because the humanitarian actions have already exhausted themselves, at least something new is needed well, i think it is not better eh to evaluate the epithets of these actions that are taking place there and the truth is difficult and slow, but still it appears on the territory of the russian federation relatively how do our citizens perceive this situation? we understand this expectation. what is now satisfied with the release of victory in all directions . only offensive windows - offensive and heavy defenses

include which unfortunately, our soldiers are dying thank you mr. yuriy yuriy roma and where do i thank mr. igor i apologize igor romanenko deputy chief of the general staff of the armed forces of ukraine from 2006 to 2010 we had this broadcast and now just now yuriy rashkin a political and public figure of the united states, with whom we will continue to discuss the situation that developed in the russian-ukrainian war and how russia reacts to it. he welcomes a certain faith. on the informational thesis, what is actually used is propaganda for blinding the eyes of the russians themselves, this time the russian troops are running. and in russia, you are doing what they are not running. do you think this behavior of russian propaganda is interesting because

we always thought that in order for this not to happen, vladimir putin will still be able to explain himself to his population, the population of ukraine, russia, that ah, everything is good, we win. victory is behind us and we can repeat it. i don’t know who wants to do it. and you are sorry. as it was said in an old joke, when it means, eh , one spouse catches the other - he says, will you believe me or your lying eyes? and in this situation, i lied. these eyes show that the situation is not developing in favor of russia, but in no way from all sides, and the ukrainian army is driving back the russian invaders - it's wonderful, it 's better, how better than even expected. and now, questions that's why the fool can tell russian propaganda, how is it? it can sell this soup from the ax to the russian population

, because, well, how can you believe all of me , this tv, this tv, or with your own eyes , to what extent do you think this situation can change ? on the other hand, the main russian propagandist is an evangelist, they sigh there for all of the alliance of warriors, they clearly don’t like it, they can’t recognize that defeat is a victory, they can’t recognize it. a salary that does not allow him to admit what he should not admit, so they will admit what was sent to them according to the method a-a, but uh, russian television, as far as i understand, has long since turned into one thing, into simulated total propaganda. where can you watch it all the time ? - there is some other version, but you know . it is so effective, it is just sad because at some point i just have the feeling that i need to be beaten.

the main thing is the constant fueling of hatred around the world, and we see it here sitting on the sidelines when our russian emigrants turn out to be radicalized, no worse than some radical muslims, simply because they watch russian television, and this is a very big threat to us here in the united states and i think for sure in russia, but they will advertise somewhere while they have their salaries, how can you convince such a person, but on the other hand , you will agree that there would never be any bad of real influence, if she did not harmonize in one way or another. between the muscles, they were watching soviet television, the truth is, and nothing is happening with us, we have not

grown horns, their tails, or hooves, but there were people nearby who believed in this galebose that she carried, so i am afraid that there is another question harmony of the consumer with the manufacturer , there is a nut with a thread that somehow coincides with this screw. i don't want to underestimate the importance of the consumer, but in this situation, we are talking about russia, so ah, what people are not able to resist, uh, this does not mean that the propaganda is not strong, i agree but this speaks of the weakness of the population because they do not have enough strength, as it were, well, this is not true. but this is a complete lie. will threaten the rest of the world with his fist. and this is a simple expression, as if the population, on the contrary , takes instructions from the tv and says who we hate today. well, that's how we will be. i don't know.

i listened to the voice of america as a child. it was interesting because i wanted to somehow understand the world, how it actually exists. there are different points of view and developing critical thinking. and this is a very big problem in russia, so maybe in some sense people support it. but that’s already it. spiral but this is a spiral. it seems to me that propaganda is starting in russia. well, you know, they are required here. i would say that there is a certain level. i would say that there is no such level of moral responsibility. maybe when the beginnings of

moral responsibility were resisted in these people. well, how do we change that they are from the soviet union? that the idea needs to be developed in people , as if by itself, it also rarely appears, but in the west , people even with children go to a resurrection school, for example, and in order not to talk about the church as bad and how much of this opium for the people teaches people on equal values, it is necessary somewhere and if it’s in a school in russia, that’s where values ​​are taught to me, that’s what great russian culture and great russian scientists are, and all of this is like such a view from a very one-sided tower, and moral values ​​are taught not only there and when people say that they have read a lot of books, this also does not say much because different people draw different conclusions from books, but it is necessary. who did you say, you know , this is good, this is bad. you will go to heaven, but what if there are things that

are not good to do and you wouldn't want these things done to you if you don't want to be reported on you, you don't need to report on others as if this mindset needs to be developed and now in russia that's all only some kind of anti-christianity is developing point of view when we all 10 covenants seem to be negated simply by 180°, each of them is such an immoral country, it is possible that it comes from the authorities and when it is impossible to change it, it does not affect the situation writer and playwright hryhoriy kanoevich who he lives in israel, and the play of which, oh, paper, smile on us, lord, is going on in, oh, the moscow theater, or the vakhtang, do you know that this season of this theater was opened by the head of the russian investigative committee , who demanded that the actors be faithful the leader of the teacher turned to the management of the theater with an open letter in which he informed

that he learned that in the new season of the theater there is a continuing performance of the play smile there, lord, based on his novels, this song was staged by vakhtangov, a lithuanian director, or something in this article, he addresses the directors and actors of the theater with the following words: he writes that all his work is devoted to respect for man and the supremacy of good over evil. therefore, i categorically demand to remove from the repertoire of the theater named after evgeny vakhtangov the play ulyubnys there lord. who is far from russia

, who has been living for a long time in the state of israel, who may not pay much attention to all the events of theatrical life because grigory konovich is 93 years old you are approaching a respectable age for a writer and in general for a person at this moment, a person who is 93 years old and who lived a long life for 5 years in the soviet union has this moral tone, and young people who play in this play or participate in its production they don't have a disposable tuning fork, or they think that their creative realization is more important than morality, even if everything proved that theater begins with morality, not hangers-on, theater begins with acting какую ложную так какзать well, how would you lie, ah, this is the main, very important acting quality, and perhaps that is why

there is such a strong theater in russia. it is important and important especially because the state that says we will take it away from you is financed if you do not make such a statement, this is a person of his own free will, he says the right things, this is especially important, it seems to me for russians, it is necessary how to translate into russian in this sense and on the other hand, there are young actors but this is putin's generation in some sense, this is the moral in the quotes of the education that russia now receives when, as putin said in the early 90s, it seems to me very important quotes, where is the time to make grandmothers, and how is it? well, this is how people live, they live in fear and they live in attempts to make money, and here it is somewhere in this range. hide a-ah and this is generally russian history

when they are scoundrels, but at the same time they do not punish anyone for what is necessary, and on the other hand, is it possible to make money somewhere or there if i say something that then we will not disperse the theater and all of us will be able to make money in this kind of range of coordinates, there is a society - this is very sad , and again it says that the culture itself . uh, push through, protect this law, and here we see it by the way in the middle states, when politicians are always using different songs, rock songs for their own, choose companies for rallies, and then the same musicians say no, no, they gave you the right to use this song very often, this is done by republicans , which means that they had even even so that the statement of the singer from 3 said when i said that we won’t do it anymore, you are the tracker and the

morgue. oh, i just sang about you. so, stop using my song. you understand that you are what i struggled with. this is you, so there are different options for what artists can do and such statements in russia, where they still respect the art theater much more, in fact, than in the united states, we are somehow the opposite. i appreciate the authenticity of the reality ah well, that's the way it is in russia more than that, because in principle he can say things that ordinary citizens cannot afford to say precisely because i believe that the issue of moral responsibility of people who they use authority, this is a very important question. and in russia, we see that these people, for the most part, do not want to use their moral authority

. concessions or is silent when they can tell the truth, this is the same soviet style of behavior , but at least not not disgusting, yes, and all the other ideas of russian television art in general, gorbacheva is obliged to these theaters, these performances, these opportunities, these international theater festivals, and where were they, the cinema, the cinematographers , and the writers. it seems that there is still a part here that we live in a society where we see it today in the states now that society is divided, the authorities are the authorities for their own and that's why when an authority speaks to find authorities that are an authority for everyone, it is very difficult, it is possible that such a rocker or pugacheva is an authority

for many people, but from another country, look at gorbachev, he is even somehow. and to say my word, but in a democratic society, it is art and theater , and they began to play a completely different role, not a protest , therefore, in this sense, as if there was more freedom and less interest. in aesop's language to prove some thoughts that we are actually only guessing because he didn't say anything concrete but he hinted oh he hinted boldly, boldly thank you yurik i remind you that our guest was yuriy rashkin, a political and public figure of the united states and now i pass on the word of iryna koval, who will introduce you to the actual market, please. thank you vitaliy. in just a moment, i will tell you about how collaborators and traitors