the universal way is an application. thank you to the entire ukrainian team that did it. thank you to our partners who gave us this opportunity. of course, we have a great ambition to fulfill all seven conditions set for us by the end of this year as the fulfillment of the advance payment of a person with candidate status. of course, we have already fulfilled more than 65% , e.e., the requirements of the association agreement we also have the ambition to fulfill almost all the conditions by the end of this year, we have the ambition to enter the negotiation procedure and of course we will move at a very fast pace we we watched and analyzed how other countries traveled this path, it took five, seven, eight years, we have the ambition to complete this path in two years at most and realize our this great idea, this great ambition to be members of the european union family will be

a full-fledged european country in the european union, this is very important we are a european country, we are on the european continent, and we have european values, democratic and civilized, we fight for them, we defend them. and of course, at the beginning of my speech, before going further, i want to thank our soldiers, our armed forces, all our military groups, who today enable us to be here and talk about our future , about our truly european, good, quality future in relation to the economy and the economy of wartime definitely consists of several parts, it involves economic and financial stability as the basis of which we are working on with this and it is very important to maintain uh actually macro-financial stability we do it with the help of our partners we do it with the help of our team and definitely without

this cannot be defeated we have to finance the army we have to fulfill our social obligations to the people and this is expensive of course we spend almost a trillion this year we have planned one trillion hryvnias for the next year to maintain our armed forces we spend quite a lot of money on social obligations this is pensions, this is also new types of activities - this is internally 7 million internally displaced persons, this is demining activity, we have costs that did not exist in peacetime, and of course about 40% the budget is supplemented by our partners, for which we are also grateful to them, as well as the supply of weapons and the support of macro-financial stability - this is very important for us, it is very important to understand that having macroeconomic self-sufficiency, having a budget that we fill by a third, we supplement it by a third

at the expense of internal of the reserve is actually a moderate mission of funds in order not to go into a spiral of hyperinflation, and it is very important that our partners give us this opportunity by financing their part of almost 40% of our military budget. it is critically important. of course, we started discussing with our partners how we will live in the next year, because i already started. three stages of today's recovery and subsequent development, modernization , the economy of the future, it is important that today we are at the stage of recovery and recovery for survival yesterday, the president was right on this stage of this

of the event, he said that the winter will be the hardest for all of us, for europe, for the world, for ukraine. we are preparing for this, moreover, we are ready for this together with our european partners. can fly into any facility can take away from us part of our power system capacity gas system for this we are preparing e-e various diversified approaches mobile equipment sufficient amount of e-e energy resources and of course we are moving to ensure a stable difficult but stable passage of this winter as the whole of europe will do. we are on the same page here. it is important to understand how we will move financially. we have today political political promises from our

european partners. we have political prospects today. from the united states, we work with the imf, here i want to note that the united states of europe today took a leadership position, literally at the beginning of the week we spoke with chancellor scholz and also source von der leyen regarding the prospects for the end of this year and the work in the next year, in particular, financial ones, and we understand what the budget deficit is, what the budget reduction is, what other measures we have to live by so that our deficit is about three billion dollars every month, now the war budget is monthly because each month is a separate budget, we have an annual budget, but by and large, living each month, we form a deficit, we close it, and we live this month again and again, these are the conditions

the war economy, the conditions of wartime, and having leadership political positions from the united states and europe, we have a rather passive relationship with the imf, of course, we work with the imf, uh, all this time, we had good relations and a good relationship with the imf in 2014-2015 when this war started, the imf really supported the leadership supported ukraine. we received 17 billion dollars of support from the imf today, cooperation with the imf is completely passive. unfortunately, but we are making every effort, we gave them all absolutely documents and

of course. now to the next stage of the development of our economy from the military problems and needs of today to our development here are several frameworks this is digitalization this is of course the reduction of the role of the state in the economy is investment in human capital is very important that these frameworks give us an understanding of how to move and digitization today has permeated ukraine through and through, we all understand the benefits, we all understand how it enables us to fight corruption by removing the human factor from many areas, we understand that investments in human capital gives us the opportunity to develop and create quality next generations that will develop a modern economy, we will move on to this and discuss it also in the future, i am very optimistic about

this is from the point of view of ukraine, and of course this is the reduction of the role of the state and the economy - this is corporatization, this is privatization - these are the things that the government is working on today, and together with our partners, these reforms have been started, and despite the war, we continue to implement them and will continue to implement them. improving institutionally all all directions in our economy, all directions in relations between the state and the economy, of course, security will be a key issue after this war, we definitely understand that we have to provide security infrastructure from bomb shelters to anti-aircraft defense means, we have to qualitatively reform our army, which today reformed on the battlefield and switched to nato standards in the shortest possible time in history, but we still have a lot of work to do, and the security

trend today is the main framework for our state. of course, even before digitization before reducing the role of the state in the economy, so here are these things from construction standards to mobo storage standards for schools to air defense equipment and e.e. reforming the army according to standards nato all these things are the potential for our country , the reformation of the military-industrial complex , which we have today and is also developing extremely actively in the conditions of war, these are also the things that will give, on which we will rely in the future, priority projects for our economy for of course, we have several dozen of them, the key one is the support of the agricultural sector. this is, of course, the support of the military-industrial complex today. we pay great attention to the development of energy, especially green energy, in relation to the digitalization of development

it infrastructure support for small and medium-sized businesses program 579 today we started a grant support program for small and medium-sized micro-businesses which is quite successful and together with partners we will develop it because the economy after this war the infrastructure of the ukrainian economy will change a large number of significant enterprises have been destroyed in the east of ukraine and e.e. with seven million internally displaced persons and five million e.e. refludsk refugees who are in europe. we need to quickly create a large number of jobs, it is possible only in small and medium-sized businesses we will move in this direction, we as a state create all the necessary conditions for this. and of course, buying ukrainian and supporting each other today is also the moment that will help our business to survive. this cannot be a program, but it can

be ours . philosophy, our idea is to support ukrainian manufacturers from small to large, so that they can withstand and survive today in this war, regarding the view of the future, i want to return to yesterday's phrase of the president of ukraine which he said here, ukraine is an asset for the european union and i 100% support this phrase. because in all spheres, in the sphere of energy, in the sphere of security, in the sphere of human capital, in all other spheres, we are truly an asset for europe, we are truly an equal and important partner and after this war, we will be a really good basis for business development here in our territories. that is why these are such important points that must be understood today, to which we must be optimistic, our big recovery plan will give huge

opportunities for our development and i have no doubt that we are very quickly catching up with what was omitted, of course we can still discuss how it will be carried out on this site on others, we have already started this discussion ukraine has, in principle, set the framework for the conference in lugano. now we are preparing next such meetings with our partners, how to implement this plan, in what terms, and in what way. that is, these are also important, and possible challenges, and what i am sure we will overcome, and here it is important to understand how the sanctions policy confiscation of the funds of the russian federation in order for it to be the basis for the future restoration of ukraine. of course, all these issues must be discussed in all the platforms of civilized countries and in all international civilized platforms. i will stop there and want to repeat once again that i am optimistic.

victory in this war will have to go through a difficult path, we have optimism ukraine has happened ukraine has happened the country as a state as a nation and of course we will have a very powerful positive prospective development in the future, one of the guests of this year's 17th yalta european strategy was egells levits, president of latvia. and by the way, he became the first head of state who not only personally came to kyiv, the capital of a warring country, but also spent the night in kyiv instead of going back in the evening and under during his speech, everyone paid attention to the fact that mr. levitz noted ukraine as one of the leaders of future europe, let's listen to his speech first of all. i would say that we have to

realistically calibrate our expectations from of international justice because it is not as perfect as, say, national systems, a lot has been done with the participation of those countries that have established the rule of law and we expect that it will work like this in the international aspect, but international law is not perfect, especially for victims, it can cause disappointment nevertheless international law is absolutely necessary in order to keep the beast in the pen in order to preserve the principles of the un charter and i would say

the un constitution and these efforts regardless of the fact that international law is not perfect, we must do everything possible to comply with the law and make the law work and i would say that first of all there are two international courts that are already considering the issue of russian aggression against ukraine, well at least some aspects of this aggression, the international court is there ukraine's lawsuit against russia not for a war crime, not for a crime of aggressive war but for a misinterpretation of the genocide convention well,

it sounds quite strange, somewhat strange, but this is an example of how to work with an international court latvia joined the ukrainian lawsuit and recently, a few days ago, the united states joined it. can you explain something to me? because it seems to me that this is quite a technological issue, and the misinterpretation of the convention on genetics does this mean that they blame russia here, it is really a conditional thing and it is about a really strong interpretation, but this is a way in which ukraine can get the international court to start considering these different aspects of the war . if there was time, i would better explain it, but it is already there

certain aspects are being considered and the international criminal court is also already considering something. they are investigating this issue. the issue is being investigated. latvia is providing assistance in order to attract witnesses. but as i said, the main crime is the crime of aggression. there is still no international court that could consider it . this is a major international crime, some aspects are considered by the courts i mentioned, but there is, in principle, an opportunity for ukraine to form a special tribunal, we have certain precedents , for example, the un special tribunal regarding yugoslavia regarding ireland, cambodia, regarding the assassination of the previous

lebanese prime minister, sir leone, liberia, and so on, and there are international tribunals that can be established by the un not by the security council for obvious reasons, but in principle by the general assembly, but it is not very easy and there is such a realistic way to establish such a tribunal is an international agreement of states that have the same attitude, five - 20 50 such states is one of the ways, and the second way is the formation of a similar one with another international organization, and i would say that the council of europe a candidate to do such a thing, and the majority of

votes there are 47 member states, which means that 24 votes will be enough for this. so, if such a candidate is nominated, it is absolutely necessary, because if the un charter says that non-aggression, the absence of aggression, is the basis of international peace, then of course there should be an international court which, from a legal point of view, should make a judgment in this matter and this will only strengthen international law, this does not mean that we are putting up with the violation, but to a certain extent. by the way, what we accept, if we accept this aggression, then

this leads to the destruction of the system of international law, and international law is the basis of international peace, and article 45 of the charter speaks of this, and therefore i very much support the idea of ​​establishing an international special tribunal that would consider russian aggression against ukraine, a special tribunal at least by those states that treat each other equally to this or they have a similar attitude to this, well, the number of such states is difficult to calculate because it depends on politics, but we have to start all over. i think that there are enough states that are ready to join such an initiative to establish a special tribunal. this is my proposal to practice the proposal. and one more remark regarding what you

said about the leaders of russia. i think that at nuremberg, the nuremberg tribunal was such a special tribunal for international legal proceedings that was organized by only four states, but it was of great importance even there had its own chain of command and the responsibility of e-e was placed on all nazi members of the chain of command from the greatest leader to the last the executor of these and here i would say that the european court of human rights, the regime there,

two figures from germany, the last president of the german democratic republic, the economist and one soldier who shot, and this means that the entire target of this command was found, were accused determined to be responsible from the most important leader to the last executor. and this means that in terms of responsibility, everyone who participated in the implementation of such e-e in the implementation of such orders can be held responsible. this is the purpose of the establishment of such an international tribunal, but mr. president, with all due respect, in the case of nuremberg and in other a-a cases, for example, in relation to the tribunal over the former east german a-a government, that’s all that happened after the

regimes collapsed and there was a change of power, but even then it was possible to show this chain subjugation, but how, apart from some such legal theater, can we do while president putin remains in power and the russian state remains as we see it, and so history makes me somewhat skeptical about the power of international law as to do this while putin is in power, so i think that the main reason, the main justification for this tribunal and the sending of international law is not to put someone in prison, this is of course one of the reasons, but the first justification , the first need, is to restore the law and it still needs to be

done with based on our system, the rule of law and this can be done in absentia in the absence of the accused and it is still possible to do it in court. i think that your examples show that until now in such cases justice has really been done after the events, but there is no such principle that would prohibit us from serving justice while these events are taking place, even as long as these people remain in power, on the contrary, the principles of international law are justified and deserve it, i

would say that law-abiding states and societies should do everything possible to to maintain the standards of international law. if we do not do this, then we lower the standards of international law by our practice, and i think that this would be a very good sign of the application of the law and certain decisions are a big argument in politics, and there are of course not only legal justifications, but also political justifications. i would support it for three reasons: the first reason is to be honest about our principles, the second reason is to support the standards of international law and not allow these practice lowered standards and the third reason is very

important political argument is not the only one by the way but among other arguments is the development and popularization of strengthening international standards for the international ladus, what would be the biggest problem or the biggest obstacle or the biggest difficulty in bringing the perpetrators of aggression to justice, to responsibility, first of all, this is a special tribunal, i don't think there will be a problem in its creation, that there are some very important obstacles, and i saw this decision against er, about the last president of the german democratic republic and the last soldier who shot at

defectors, and it happened 20 years ago, and there is a warning to all the dictators for the future, i can only imagine to what extent it is relevant in 20 years, but the first step is less, that is, it proves to us that it is possible, we need political will in order for such a thing to be created, then i cannot say that in order to imprison someone, we have all to work for it. this, as i said, is not our main goal, the main goal is to ensure the supremacy of international law, because impunity also means an invitation to create and commit crimes

in the future and in order to maintain peace. we can not allow this and it is not the only tool which we have in our hands, before the war i was a photographer and now i am a combat medic, all my relatives were surprised that i became a soldier, because i look fragile and weak. officers in the world, 15% of the ukrainian army are women, with their work,

courage, honor and courage, they proved that they are no different from the other 85%." we will prevail we will win we will win the news together we are strong more than 100 talented athletes and sportsmen more than 100 glorious ukrainian men and women took their lives russia will not forgive we honor everyone and we win everyone for the sake of your memory angels

of sports angels of ukraine our method is to act in advance our task is to disrupt the plans of the enemy our slogan wise will rule on the mirrors our battlefield conveys deep you in the enemy, our goal is victory. glory to the military intelligence of ukraine , we will convince the paragame , we will win that you are not news. windows i congratulate you, the occupiers exist because of defeats on the battlefield. in the evening, they fired 12 cruise missiles over the east of ukraine - six calibers from ships in the black sea and six