cruiser moscow large amphibious assault ship saratov other ships they were well and rescue tug beh other boats were small, mainly these are raptors they were damaged near the island of the snake well and one in the sea of ​​azov other ships are supposedly ready to perform the task the biggest threat is nine missile ships that shoot with calibers, but now the problem is with the missiles themselves, there are not many of them, and they shoot. well, if before it was daily, now it is once a week or two, but secondly, it means landing ships. 12 units are completed, they are based in sevastopol and in novorossiysk, but now the reality of the amphibious landing is very unlikely , because the northwestern part of the black sea is being fired at by our missile systems, and there are still ships with soviet-made missile weapons

, and nine more yes, they can also be used to blockade shipping and they are used for this a-a there are anti- draft ships and there are support vessels a-a well there is an anti- mine please tell me how strong the occupying power in crimea is now they control everything there, and in connection with the successes of the armed forces, has the pressure on pro-ukrainian crimeans increased in response to the change in the mood of the crimean people? there they do not reveal the details of the russian fsb's report on the occupied crimea that they allegedly prejudged a series of what they call me terrorist

acts of sabotage that were prepared by the sbu of ukraine with the involvement of nationalists, well, of course, nationalists it's the crimean tatars, let's see. today during the day. what will it cost? i think that today we will know the data on the large-scale arrests, how it happened in september in the dzhankoy district , when many crimean tatars were arrested, that is, they use it to suppress the will of the people their sentiments are a common tool for them, this is repression. refatogs understand that a meeting between president retepe tayyip erdoğan and vladimir putin is possible. by french president macron and putin, and macron again called on russia, so to speak, to withdraw the

occupying forces from our territory, this may mean in passing that, in particular, our successes in the same kharkiv region may mean that the russian military situation may deteriorate rapidly and they will look for those or other forms of diplomatic negotiations how do you see this situation ? to initiate negotiations, dialogues with putin, in addition to the issues of what russia is doing to ukraine and its partners, there simply shouldn't be any other negotiations, because any negotiations with initiatives that the western leaders, or the president of

turkey, jordan, are trying to get here there was no search together with these kremlin people for the mechanisms of rescuing russia when it is already clearly going to the abyss and that is why we need to be very vigilant about these negotiations. but at the same time, we gave signals to those who will uh to meet with putin the other day and talk to putin about what to discuss with him then about the implementation of your position, in particular, the president of turkey during the crimean platform very clearly expressed turkey's very clear positions, which are that the occupation of occupied crimea is illegal and russia must withdraw from crimea and other occupied territories of ukraine. so, if

these meetings did not occur, if they do take place, they should be based on the interests of the countries that these leaders represent. if they are going to talk about ukraine, then let them talk only about one thing about the liberation of our territories by the russian troops that president erdogan brought to the final meeting with president zelensky in lviv is already understood. i think that this question should be put before the president of ukraine in such a capacity, but based on the fact that the events that happened later, well, such positive for ukraine, including regarding the e-e passage of ships to odesa port. i think that at the highest level between the leadership of ukraine and turkey there is a frank e-e consultation, a frank discussion of all these issues and are

such decisions are primarily in the interests of the ukrainian state, which is in a state of war with russia. thank you, referee chubarov, the heads of the crimean-tatar people, and andriy ryzhenko, captain of the first rank of the reserve of the naval forces of ukraine, expert of the center of defense strategies of the 11th hour 35 minute now we will also analyze extremely important things igor kozlovsky religion from skills candidate of historical sciences political prisoner of the kremlin p igor we congratulate you greetings good health and oleksandr drabynko should also join metropolitan of pereyaslavskyi and vyshnevskyi orthodox church of ukraine pad oleksandr we welcome you, we are waiting for oleksandr ladder e p igor , let's start with you about saboteurs and

collaborators in religious ranks, in particular, in the liberated territories, what is known now in connection with the counter offensive of the armed forces of the forces of ukraine, well, you understand , yes, for russia, what kind of empire is it, the diversity of the ukrainian religious landscape is frightening, and the diversity of it is not clear to them. on the one hand, on the other hand, they are amazed that our believers, they are active citizens and a part of such a subject civil space in general, and from the very beginning they are conducting the same experiment that they conducted on the territory of the occupied regions of donetsk, luhansk region in crimea, for 8-8 years, they

spread this experiment practically the entire territory of the occupied regions of ukraine, and their task is to destroy these various people on the one hand. that is, they are afraid of any freedom, including religious freedom. ukraine is not fighting for there are many such values. i always single out three main ones - this is freedom - this is dignity, this is identity , and for russia, the main thing now is to create uniformity in the occupied territories, what does this mean , it means that it is necessary to destroy not just any conscious on the contrary, even at the level of opinions for representatives of various religious communities, they saw it, for example, on the example of the

heroic mariupol, when representatives of various religious organizations showed not exactly such examples of filth, they took away our citizens where they helped aries and that is why they immediately began to destroy as they only came to destroy any manifestations of any other religiosity with the exception of representatives of the moscow patriarchate who are considered as actually theirs in quotes and this leads to the fact that a-a with different methods from one on the other hand, there are those who actively collaborate and become conscious collaborators, conscious assistants of the occupation authorities, and of course, while remaining in our vacated places, they continue to actually carry out this or that destructive work that

they were assigned precisely by the russians and with others, and i understood those who refuse, then they would conduct the so -called prophylactic prophylactic here no, and as a result, someone breaks into someone, someone just goes to such a forced, not a silent state, there are some who, uh, left these territories, for example, on there are some priests of the moscow patriarchate in the kherson region who have left about the ukrainian position, but there are not those who have really become with those who did not simply support statistics regarding collaborators, that is, people representing our clergy who are average cooperation with the enemy, in particular, i don’t know about the gunners, about the coordinators of their agent networks, is there already an approximate number of which

denominations, so to speak, of the church participate in this kind of thing? it is a fact, but what are the statistics? do you understand this? it is necessary for law enforcement structures, which, unfortunately, do not have the time to carry out such work in their own time, meaning that in the 14th year, they do not create exactly that. necessary for the work that does not need not only to record these facts of collaboration, to really bring them to justice, and all we have are, on the one hand, seemingly insignificant numbers, but the fact is that the facts that civil society has are

much more, and this is a question for law enforcement agencies which should really be on the basis of financial issues, for example, representatives of the inter valuable army of the army of occupiers, it falls under the article collaboration, well, or is it some kind of, so to speak, there should only be a moral assessment and deprivation of e parish service and in general, have there been any reactions, for example, from the central authorities of the church, such that those who bequeath and position themselves there sign some declarations and so on, i.e., whether priests who collaborate with russian enemies are generally removed from service, unfortunately, no, and that the time when they held councils is also a problem. we remember at the end of may, i expected that there would still be some such messages that do not just talk

about aggression for, but condemn the ideology itself patriarch kirill is also condemned in the russian world, and in that regard, i have not heard any messages related to collaboration, that is, there is no solution, and the facts are known. the ukrainian orthodox church knows about it , but unfortunately, it is episcopal and not as separate ones there. not the bishops, but also the council as a whole, they do not make any judgments on this matter and this really can not help but worry. this is really a problem because there is no ecclesiastical assessment, they do not have a moral assessment. and it is only civil society that does not raise its voice as for the consecration of the consecration of the weapons

of the consecration of these occupying troops, their equipment, these are also these facts, again, we have an act of legislation, these nuances are not prescribed in such detail, and we can face the fact that they will avoid a just punishment for his position, he will continue his service, and this happens not only at the level of ordinary priests, it happens at the level of those or bishops . actually supported the occupiers and we do not know what will happen next, how will he feel? well, so far the facts where he

is unknown now that he has been released are yes . donetsk , luhansk region and these well-known facts, but the church itself is of no consequence, and we will not add this matter to the conversation of the metropolitan of the pereyaslavsky and vyshnevsky orthodox church of ukraine oleksandr drabinka, we congratulate you, mr. oleksandr, most sincerely greetings glory to jesus christ, your blessedness, here we are, you wanted to include you in our passionate discussion , it is in particular about the participation of representatives of various church denominations, although we understand that it is about the moscow patriarchate, yes, in collaboration with the

enemy, is there any priest from moscow on the video and he blessed he is known to the collaborators there. and what about him, olexander, the last thing i heard was that he is now in belgorod, already there in the churches of the moscow patriarchate. churches located in the moscow patriarchate are located in the moscow patriarchate, but paradoxes continue to exist on ukrainian land now, after six months of full-scale armed aggression by russia in the heart of the capital, the moscow patriarchate of mr. oleksandr somehow correlates the transition of churches to the ukrainian orthodox church there with the presence the enemy. perhaps in the de-occupied territories more communities are freed and want to

move. you see and understand this every day. they say that everything is not on time, uh, i don’t understand when it will be on time, ugh, and what needs to be on time, because we also don’t understand, maybe you have some tools from the middle that are more visible decisions, when it will be said that in the end, why can the moscow patriarchate be banned in the baltic states, but not in ukraine, but it is not clear to me, well, accordingly, bishop, i would like to clarify with you. and what are the current dynamics of the transition of priests other hierarchs are from moscow of the patriarchate to the ukrainian orthodox church, well,

actually, there is absolutely no dynamic, since all the parishes that join the orthodox church of ukraine today, they join without priests. i would very much like these parishes to join with their leading priests who know them. but unfortunately, we we haven't seen such a trend. we don't know anything. we know a priest . join the parish. photo. there is a community there. yes, it is a real community. it is called a parish community . where is he going? i think that he will come like uh a year and a half ago i had the same situation when the priest came and said i somehow gave up the parish in the 14th year and

came today please give me a new uh sorry na there will be a new parish with a new priest. and how is it happening? and what is the situation now with property that is used by representatives, so to speak, as state property, community property, as it is used, for example, by representatives of the moscow patriarchate in ukraine? the ministry of culture, because they are in charge of those objects that are in state ownership today, and i would answer this question as uh, i would answer but as the minister will answer i don't know either. i've already heard his answer. it's clear that all state-

owned objects should be handed over to the orthodox church of ukraine. well, actually, we're asking you, maybe the situation has changed now, something positive has appeared. dynamics and discussions or consultations with you, well, in particular, not with you, only specifically, but with the orthodox church of ukraine, with the ukrainian greek-catholic church, and so on, the point is that there are clear and specific legal regulations, and only in their context, we have to solve these issues, mr. igor, you see some mechanisms of influencing the community of people on this issue , what to do with this story, i agree with bishop oleksandr, we really are in such a situation that, on the one hand, we are building a legal state, and our

legal state must have certain legislation that can react precisely to these problems, uh, what arguments does the authorities put forward, why don't they intervene in this process? well, first of all, the orthodox ukrainian orthodox church in unity with the moscow patriarchate, uh, 12,000 parishes is a large number of people for the people of priests, there are about 10,000 priests. and that this can lead to certain such negative changes. and from the point of view of both the internal situation in ukraine and the external one, because our european partners are following me in general, these issues of freedom conscience in ukraine is regulated, on the other hand, i understood that this should be done, but we just

started with you with the problem of collaboration and the fact that the silence of the bishop and the ukrainian orthodox church regarding these issues, these questions should be asked, responsibility should be emphasized, that is it is necessary to start with a fair, truly fair punishment and show the public that there is a certain tendency, and it is they who give the most representatives, it is precisely these collaborators, the least bright of their representatives, we already they talked about blessings and so on. and this is already the task of the state, and this in general, and our partners will also understand it, and it is not a border, and they are interested in ukraine being valid, on the one hand, legal and democratic, and on the other hand, that it

is a truly fair democratic state, it is necessary to introduce certain points in the legislation and ask the question why are the decisions that were already taken at the level of the verkhovna rada regarding the inclusion in the name of the affiliation to the moscow patriarchate not implemented? why isn't it being implemented, why aren't these questions being asked, again, quite hesitantly, they say that there is a war going on in our country, and again, i did n't understand this at the time because, again, we record these cases, illegal cases with related precisely during the war, and if the necessary m-mechanisms of influence on this situation were valid, it could one way or another again change

this, these, these, problems related to collaboration, people would no longer understand their responsibility for that that they enter into such an active collaboration with enemy and this would possibly become a factor that would reduce the risks that we face and will face in the de-occupied territories, yes dear mr. igor, we completely agree with you. this is an extremely delicate matter. there are religious confrontations in order to open another intra-ukrainian front, so to speak, but we see that our people are wise, but still the situation should be normalized, the christ-loving vladyka oleksandr thought what a step that our government would have taken as soon as possible. in the dialogue with various church

structures in ukraine, because such a feeling continues, it cannot continue inertially. in my opinion, such steps should have been taken in 14-18 , when it was formed the ecclesiastical structure of the local ukrainian orthodox church, i don't know how, today, it is possible to do something, well, apparently, the power structures should take some measures of their own. i don't know what can be done today. i thought and i think that the state should accept there are some legislative regulations why the baltic states can , but we cannot, mr. oleksandr. and how do you evaluate these initiatives? there were a couple of local communities in konotop after that, on the territory of the

city council, the activities of the moscow patriarchate were banned. to be honest, i absolutely do not consider them because they cannot do anything is there any significance? we have some results. i know at least 25 such decisions. the decision has been brought to an end. they say that it is more psychological. such a decision is at the community level so that people understand. political if you want a solution well, at least some kind of solution when there are no decisions from the authorities, why make decisions that have no consequences well , if the community decides that it does not want the moscow patriarchate to be on its territory, while there in kyiv, they will think about it so there is no

answer to your questions that they are more political, these decisions do not have such legislative force, on the one hand, on the other hand, we understand that yes, we can prohibit something. to change consciousness just like that, in order to change the situation, it is necessary to work at different levels, including working with the consciousness of people, that is, there must be a de-occupation of consciousness, and here we must demand from the episcopate a more assertive position regarding its ukrainian wall, precisely about the ukrainian position and from the bishop of that of the moscow patriarchate if they really want to live in ukraine and be citizens of ukraine and defend the ukrainian position, and this will also affect the

consciousness of believers and so on the civil society of ukraine is diverse and it requires and requires the authorities to work on these issues and it is clear that these political decisions in certain regions of ukraine are under the influence of civil society itself, this is the voice of civil society, and they are especially important from a political point of view vision, but working on consciousness is not a general problem and a general task of both active civil society and the state together, kozlovsky, religious scholar, candidate of historical sciences and oleksandra drabynko - metropolitan pereyaslavskyi and vyshnevskyi of the orthodox church of ukraine were our guests, we are finishing the analytical part today antin borkovskyi anna valevska continues anna valevska will continue literally in a couple of hours the analysis of current events angelika

season right now with news angelika word to you if you have an allergy the drug cetrin will help you breathe and get rid of itchy eyes and watery eyes - cetrin specifically blocks histamine receptors and usually starts to protect against allergies in 20 minutes, tsetrin acted in the allergy center in ukraine and volunteers, all possible death to the enemies of ukraine! they will find everyone they will feed everyone their tails will be saved they will be given on airplanes they will be supported by doctors they will help lullabies they will sing foresters they will equip everyone they will hug everyone glory

to ukraine to the whole world ukraine is glorified for the volunteer kind there is no translation all of ukraine thanks you how to get housing assistance for internally displaced persons you have moved from the territory of are located in the venue area hostilities or are under temporary occupation, receive accommodation assistance in the amount of uah 2,000 or uah 3,000 for persons with disabilities and children , assistance can also be received by people whose housing is destroyed or unfit for living due to damage.