and unfortunately, well, in our context, i would not really like the attention to be refocused on this part. please tell me if there are reports that uavs are used in particular. if we are talking about mykolai about drones, i did not say that they are equally powerful, and yet the bazhan army is considered to be more modernized and has more potential than the armenian army and is clearly less dependent even on supplies from turkey in the air this is the azerbaijani army because, well, again, they had financial opportunities in order to first buy airplanes, and especially drones. and we know that this is turkey, which is, in principle, one of the leading countries in the production of

drones, because of azerbaijan. there are definitely enough of them, mr. bohdan i am not letting you go yet, i want you to inform me as well. you said that azerbaijan has become a weakness of russia and that full assistance will not be provided as armenia had hoped . in what other areas do we periodically say that conflicts can arise in what other areas can a similar situation arise, that is, the empire is disintegrating before our eyes in the 21st century. it is clear not yet in the 22nd year, but there will be future years where these conflict points can be. the eastern partnership, as our european colleagues call it, is very conflict-prone, and those frozen conflicts that date back to the 90s have

the ability to quickly intensify under certain circumstances conditions in principle all countries territorial problems if we mention moldova, then transnistria is there, if armenia is azerbaijan, nagorno-karabakh is there, if georgia is there, the territories are also occupied by russia. and if belarus, well, we understand. also, there is a conditionality of the answer - regarding certain independence and sovereignty, that is, now it is completely under the control of russia that is why our region is super vulnerable in the context of the clash of geopolitical centers of influence with western russia, partly with china, and internal conflict-causing factors, as well as the balkan region, historically and traditionally, everything is there ethnicities are mixed there, interests are there, but this region is already closer to the european union, some

member states are already within the european community, so it is a little easier to moderate and, so to speak, regulate the situation, although there are also incidents now directly between kursk and serbia such conflict stages, plus there is the middle east, plus we saw that taiwan, that is, the world is becoming even more electrified, and every point is sometimes like that. protracted wars and conflicts. that is, it is electrification, which also has a cause and effect relationship. that is, these are not the situations that have just arisen, the same as in the relations between russia and ukraine, that is, ukraine will finally put an end to these protracted battles directly, so the questions are the question you know what, you know the world order. it is

also being formed right there. we say after the post-war period, after the second world war, that is, different centers of influence have come to some understanding that it is necessary to sort it out. yes, there was a period of the cold war, the intensity, let's say, decreased a little, the conflict potential, although there were again such outbreaks at various points, but we see that now the phase is, we are entering the phase of more intensification , i said so, and i still don't feel it. no assumes that it is somehow possible to balance, that is, it used to be that there is one hegemon, the united states of america, and in principle they plus or minus influence and moderate the situation in different parts of the world, now russia and china want to undermine this the world order and claim that there are

different centers and poles of influence, and in regional directions we see exactly this intensity provoked in part by these ambitions and this desire. this is how you can actually explain in which world we live in a really restless and security context. unfortunately so we need to prepare for such challenges, just as military experts separately said that a second fund from russia is brewing, but in fact we have this night and this front was opened by azerbaijan, that is, we have such a story. next we will discuss this bohdan ferins an expert on international issues to you mr. bohdan thank you, we let you go, we continue our live broadcast unconquered cities of ukraine, this is a cozy and comfortable kharkiv

, a city of students of science and industry, a city that has been repeatedly attacked by tatars since ancient times, passed both into the hands of bolshevik invaders and would have given the german fascists but kharkiv to lead and kept ukraine in his heart then and now kharkiv the unconquered russian peace is only capable of destroying hundreds of ruined houses they the infrastructure of the devastation of the city, but he cannot understand and overcome our faith and love for the homeland, every brick from the questioning house will lay in the foundation of a new independent and happy ukraine,

more than 100 talented sportsmen and sportswomen, more than 100 glorious ukrainian men and women, no life was taken by russia, we will not forgive, we honor everyone and we win everyone for the sake of your memory angels of sports angels of ukraine our agronomists examine every piece of land to choose the best places for crops our bankers find funds for crops

works on a thousand hectares, drivers of gasoline trucks deliver fuel daily throughout the country so that brave combine harvesters and tractor drivers on mined fields do their daily feat, and railway workers deliver the fruits of joint labor to every corner of ukraine, agrarians, we work tomorrow, victory, the theme of the famine of 32-33 years, apparently overgrown 32-33 years, apparently overgrown with the largest number of myths of soviet propaganda, it was repeatedly heard that the famine caused a crop failure or that the famine was not only on the territory of ukraine but also in other countries of the ussr or ukrainians themselves went on hunger strike as a sign of protest against

the regime of that time, so olesya nitsevich refutes the most common myths about genocide in ukraine, five myths about the holodomor, the russian government was not involved in the holodomor, and vladimir putin himself often argues that the holodomor was not a policy of the soviet government aimed at destruction and taming of the ukrainians according to their rhetoric, mass hunger was influenced by sabotage of ukrainian peasants and weather conditions and the need to get the economy of the state afloat, but still in the russian archives there are documents that prove the facts of the genocide of ukrainians, but no one opens access to them. and why did the famine cause a crop failure? another widely known thesis is that the cause of the famine was allegedly the weather conditions, so indeed the weather affected the yield indicators, but it is worth adding here stalin's decision on grain procurement in the villages, there was a lack of grain for sowing because it was ordered to be taken out of the ukrainian ssr, so there was almost nothing left for sowing. thus

, the peasants did not have access to the harvest and could not feed themselves from their families, there was hunger in the disobedience of ukrainians to the entire soviet union to russify and renounce their nationality and history has always been a pressing issue for the soviet authorities, and it was the unsustainable plans for grain procurement at that time that became the main tool for the destruction of people, the so-called black boards also appeared, where entire districts, settlements and collective farms were swept away this meant blocking by special forces and troops and banning travel outside these territories and trade, as well as seizing food products, ukrainians did not do one more plus to the soviet myths that ukraine is supposed to take over itself because it did not resist the regime of that time. well, in fact , it happened precisely because of the disagreement of the ukrainians. only in 1930 did 30% of the peasant uprisings against the soviet government take place in ukraine in order to quell the insurgent mood of the soviets at that time . more than 70,000

farms were depopulated, more than 30,000 families were deported, but even in this case, people did not give up and went to the last, tried to hide crops, fled from collective farms or to save themselves. the soviet union and local officials, such a thesis is explained by the fact that people from moscow did not come specially to arrange an artificial voice at that time, the corresponding orders were released on the spot by their own ukrainian officials, and this story does not deny , but these people were members of the communist party of the bolsheviks of ukraine, that is, part of the soviet government but there are also opposite cases when such party cadres specially delayed and damaged plans for grain procurement or refused to carry them out or left the party already in independent ukraine in 2006, the verkhovna rada passed a law qualifying the holodomor as genocide of the ukrainian people, and in may 2009, the sbu opened proceedings on the fact of committing genocide 32-33 years ago, then the investigation proved that the leadership of the soviet union

had intentions to destroy a part of the ukrainian nation, and a year later the city's court of appeal kyiv recognized as proven that the action was carried out in the holodomor with the aim of suppressing the ukrainian national liberation movement and preventing the establishment of an independent ukrainian state on september 13 buchi's day ukraine is not bad after a month of service, i proved to my brothers that i am not just a woman. i am a soldier. i carry equipment and weapons on a level. lugi was skilled and i will be 15%

of the ukrainian army, these are women, with their work, courage , honor and courage, they proved that they are no different from the other 85%." and disobedience, a symbol of revenge and memory of ancestors , a kind heart, and motherhood, a symbol of the family hostilities, the symbol of despair and the main

symbol of fantastic people, our agronomists examine every piece of land to choose the best places for crops, our bankers find funds for sowing work on a thousand hectares, drivers of gasoline trucks deliver fuel daily throughout the country so that courageous combine harvesters and tractor drivers of unmined fields do their daily feat, and railway workers delivered the fruits of joint labor to every corner of ukraine, agrarians, we work tomorrow , victory for you, and in defense, day and night,

desperate, confident, they swim the way with armor to our victory, the tank troops are the pride of the armed forces of the armed forces of ukraine on the border of armenia and azerbaijan, hostilities have begun at this time among the personnel of the armenian army, this was announced in the ministry of defense of azerbaijan, which was quoted by the media, there accused armenia of sabotage and large-scale military provocations, at the same time, the ministry of defense of armenia was accused azerbaijan carried out artillery strikes on the border cities of armenia, the confrontation in nagorno-karabakh, the ethnic conflict between armenia and azerbaijan which arose in 1987 and is still ongoing during the first arabat war, which ended in 1994

, most of the territory of the former nagorno-karabakh autonomous region with a predominantly armenian population came under the control of the newly created nagorno-karabakh republic, friendly to yerevan. and the armed conflict itself was frozen for a long time the hot stage of confrontation was repeated in the 20th year when, as a result of the one and a half month war, azerbaijan with the support of turkey took control of five cities, four towns 247 and also the whole of azerbaijan the iranian border in general. the number of victims of the conflict over the years is estimated at almost 50,000, and it is also important to add that this 44-day karavay war, the second war, which is called there in the area, ended on november 10, 2020, and then precisely such a place of conflict remained lachin - it is specifically 6 km the road that connects armenia and nagorno-karabakh and in fact, conflicts continued there constantly, and these conflicts, as we can see tonight, turned into

an aggravation again dmytro gormakov, a military expert will now explain this situation p dmytro i congratulate you good night, i wanted to understand that you would explain to us directly. azerbaijan kept saying let's build a new road and appealed to armenia to bypass this gap. azerbaijan claimed this village, in which 80 people remained and they are armenians. azerbaijan said starting from this november 20, let's move out. from here , because this is our territory, and in particular they gave the armenians time until august 25 this year, but the armenians said that according to the contract, they have three years, in fact , here is a situation that needs clarification, that is, ani azerbaijanis and not armenians, despite the fact that there was such a

frozen conflict, they were not going to retreat from this situation. of the war, and it was clearly written there that the liberation of the orna karabakh region should be resolved in a diplomatic way, and that the parties should somehow get closer to the press, and this conflict is currently becoming a failure of russian diplomacy on

in the caucasian direction, because the russians, if the azerbaijanis stop us now and armenia loses nagorno-karabakh, this district, well, in fact , there will be some problems with the closing of the russian base, and er, that is, and with jesus, the history of this conflict and the russian diplomatic presence in the caucasus and on this border, on the one hand, and we clearly understand that turkey stands behind azerbaijan, just as it

stands behind armenia, and on the third side, literally a month ago, representatives of armenia were there the united states, which also offered something to the armenian side for its support and for armenia's non-participation in the conflict between russia and ukraine, which means also a person, which means that the americans also offered something for not participating in the conflict. what exactly could it be as support the current government, which came to power thanks to the help of the united

states, that is, as a result of the revolution, and which was forced to compromise with the russians and azerbaijanis, and during the 41st war, that is, this entire war - it was such a tsarist day yes, russia in order to return your influence to armenia, you can see already from the contract, you can see that just a few days ago, the prime minister of armenia, never pashinyan, he expressed fears that the concentration of the international community's attention on the directly ukrainian issue could lead to destabilization of the situation in the south caucasus , that is, he spoke about this to the speaking vladivostok and actually these fears were fully justified on

now we have information that koshenian held a telephone conversation i am now reading public directly there, the armenians, what we have from azerbaijan, held a conversation with putin due to the escalation of this situation and actually criticized pashinyan for this, that is, he felt that there was not enough support, although we talk about the fact that armenia is supported by russia. he says that there is not enough support from russia, but in fact he is calling, well, we can still understand from this mass media, he is calling putin about what armenia can ask for now and what help russia can provide now, which threw all its forces into ukraine, first of all, without protecting this and that village and the last roads from armenia and nagorno-karabakh are the gateway to

russian peacekeepers and forces and logistics. can russia transfer part of its forces for the sake of a village of 80 people for the sake of a six-kilometer road directly from this, the most controversial in this confrontation, azerbaijan at the moment, since 1987, the situation has changed. russia to overturn that is how do you miss how can you predict russia the potential everything is the potential to solve this issue by military means and the peacekeepers who are they even there and they stand to solve such issues, but the problem is whether they have enough strength and means to restrain the azerbaijani army today, because it

is you who, according to some versions, say that kardogan exchanged the stronghold of karabakh for the opportunity to negotiate with kyiv on the resolution of the ukrainian conflict, this issue was discussed at a meeting with putin in the summer, and that is why, recently, one of the last statements was made that the peacekeepers are withdrawing from this issue this corridor and take control of another section of the road that allows connecting armenia and the main karabakh, but the

central highway. this road was transferred to the control of azerbaijan, and that's why it was in vladivostok - it's a kitten and talks about the lack of attention of the international community , that's all i understand, dmytro, now how many peacekeepers can there be, well, meanwhile, when i hear what you say, russia can do everything, russia can't do everything, and the situation in ukraine shows that it is everything more powerless, that is, now we will not analyze the defeat of russia directly here in ukraine, but in the meantime, how many peacekeepers are there today? armenia mined the areas between the positions of the units of the azerbaijani army. perhaps because they

believed that there is not enough peacekeeping contingent there, there is not enough russian support there and the armenians understood that they were given a date in order to leave the larvae until august 25, and today is already september, and in fact they understood that the situation and those statements of pishnianova will escalate. that is, it will not just escalate , it will turn into directly, this is what is happening tonight to shots and death right away the question is what azerbaijan and france are capable of in order to renew their sovereignty over the territory that we consider ours and what is their history based on their military potential potential, so how much today we already have

a very difficult question that there are a lot of influencing factors that can, and above all, even this one, we can, er, in this situation, there are also some advantages on the russian side, that is, now, the attack on azerbaijan as er, well, let me introduce in the lobby of the russian peacekeepers , they can lead to the same thing that the situation in transnistria led to and with the attack on the peacekeepers when the russians generally introduced a very large contingent there. therefore, now russia can become a part of this international well

of the problematic question, how does it relate to official peacekeepers and how does the world support russia in its operation to protect there and fulfill the mandate, let's add information, i will ask you one more question, armenia accused azerbaijan of shelling, prime minister nikol pashinyan said this during a telephone conversation conversations with the president of russia, vladimir putin, about which i have already said , but now it was reported on the website of the head of the government. that is, this is already official information of the pashyanka, which claims about the provocative aggressive actions of the armed forces of the forces of azerbaijan, which were accompanied by shelling from artillery and large-caliber firearms , the interlocutors agreed to maintain operational communication, you see. we have no information that russia is ready to support with all its might and is ready to provide large forces to support armenia, and who else can actually support armenia or only ptashenyan can

talk to russia and to putin in the bunker. well, there, in fact, it is turkey, which is part of the winning process, i don't remember there, but france, which also appears mediator in this conflict. that is, all these trees should somehow not get involved and start solving this issue, but i will repeat that now the alarm has already been raised. the base that is located on every karabas and the russian right. the meeting of the aggressor is clear. you can not say how many contingents are there how many soldiers are there, what forces and potential are there, that is, i understand yes, mr.

dmitry, i will ask you the last question, why, in principle, armenia refused to build a new road, which, in fact, they were supposed to build and she was supposed to be built literally in a year, when this three-year term expired after the end of the second karabakh war of 44 days, why was armenia delaying this process, that is, they did not want to leave this section of the road at all, it can be assumed that they really did not want to go. really thought that they believed that this conflict and these negotiations will continue in the future according to the scenario as they went from 1994 to 2020, that is, here