in the 8th year, when we expected, we will already cross after the victory because of it. we will actually fulfill it. well, in this situation, i can again refer to the statement of ms. stefanyshina, for example, who stated that, in principle, ukraine already does not need the pdch. she can already ask questions about membership in nato, and in principle, i see nothing so extraordinary here, although you know that now it may seem to us something so incredible, something so beyond our understanding. but i do not see anything extraordinary here, moreover, i think that after ukraine's victory, integration into nato can happen even faster than in the european union , because de facto, everything is already ready for this, that is, the ukrainian army is rapidly moving to the relevant aspects related to nato standards in all understandings of this word. relevant legal aspects, material and technical, where to go from them

well, of course, this russian langlist under the raisin, let’s say so, will add soviet-style equipment to us , but we will still refuse it, we will switch to the corresponding nato ones standards and the most important thing is that ukraine demonstrates to the whole world that it has an army really suitable for a real war, and for the military-political alliance, well, it is probably a serious enough factor , a weighty factor, yes, that is, not just to expand quantitatively, but to integrate into its community, let’s say, is very serious and powerful force therefore again but for this , the first and key factor must be implemented, which is the victory of ukraine, the liberation of all ukrainian territories, access to the constitutional state borders of ukraine. i think that when it is implemented, everything can happen very, very quickly. sergey. and what do you

think? look at it in the winter, that is, in early spring, the minister of reznikov made a decision, and the ministry of defense actually made a decision, and a proposal for the event. give us western weapons, we don't need to overwhelm us with exactly this soviet er-e large amount in order to build up only this large amount of soviet. the world is absolutely soviet and we need it, we need it so that we can maintain in the current state what we have, that is, so that we can replenish replenish units of equipment , parts for repair and so on. but the most important thing is that the ministry has taken a course for the total rearmament of our troops and this question was raised in the early spring and this question was raised at the first meetings in the rammstein format, and now we see the previous ones in madrid nato that it says

that all of ukraine is already part of the general general of the security e-e, so to speak, of nato's regional strategy. that is, they already see us as an integral component of the e-e in order to guarantee security in the region, and the rammstein format may in this case be the implementation of nato's fifth article because we have not seen it what about the fifth article on paper at all, yes, because uh, because it is simply not effective. well, what is two weeks to respond to any threat, in two weeks, the russians planned to seize the entire territory of ukraine within two weeks, no country will resist which is under a potential attack from russia, that is, neither the baltic countries, nor the countries in the balkans, poland is possible, unless, that is, in no country, it is difficult for you to understand this. we think that nato countries, nato countries are something like that, but all the countries of the east. none of these countries

has sufficient military power to cope with the russian invasion that was as of february 24 of this year, and only ukraine . despite everything that was being prepared for us, it is still true that it is a smaller army of a generation - three, and in russia supposedly generation three plus, that is, both there and there, the old army should have lost according to mathematics, but what is the difference, so it is true that we are already a nato country, that is, we have built such a system of armed forces, which today is simply not the russian army sees theirs, and their hierarchy is very, well, so clear. well, you are actually a dictate without initiative, and unlike them, we have when each unit has some autonomy, has creativity in decision-making, and this showed that their whole system, this whole machine is broken actually, under motivated ukrainian army. that is,

our army is much better than any army of nato countries. there is only one condition. we need a tool, that is, any army consists not only of fighters, not only soldiers, but also of weapons and equipment from logistics. that is, it is a tool to translate this motivation into victory. and here is this tool. today, we need from the western countries the broadcast of the tv channel rada within the framework of the single news marathon. support the armed forces. believe in our victory and stay with us 13 september was the day whose ukraine is not evil. after a month of service, i proved to my comrades that i am not

just a woman. i am a soldier. she was skilled lugy and i will be 15% of the ukrainian army - these are women with their work, courage, honor and courage, they proved that they are no different from the other 85%." a group of scouts with callsigns will travel more than two thousand kilometers along the front line every day

he risks his life and every day he says, i am not tired, i am not tired of defending ukraine, families grow, love grows in the family, warmth lives, support and thousands of prayers, the family protects and when it does not leave, the family is sacred and without the family there is no nation and people, the family is unbreakable, we are all relatives, the family is ukraine russian peace is

only capable of destroying hundreds of dilapidated houses, they are the infrastructure of the devastation of the city, but it cannot understand and overcome our faith and love for the motherland, every brick from the broken house will lay in the foundation of a new independent and happy ukraine with by you, tetyana goncharova and the entire team of the tv channel rada live on the air until six in the morning, a new day begins. good morning, we are working on the border of armenia and azerbaijan, the hostilities are not abating, there are dead and wounded, their number is being clarified , the prime minister of armenia nikol pashinyan called putin about that blinkedly asked for an international reaction, the interlocutors agreed to maintain operational communication , the us secretary of state called for an end to hostilities

after the prime minister of armenia urgently convened a council of in the end, he said that he would ask for help from russia and the organization of a collective security agreement. yerevan accused baku of shelling border cities. the armenian defense ministry says that the armed forces of azerbaijan are conducting intensive shelling in three directions. they use unmanned aerial vehicles in azerbaijan. they called it delusional and in their statement that armenia is the aggressor state and the occupier in the region and it is she or the copper of the provocations on the border the only aggressor and occupier in the region is the republic of armenia the presence of personnel and equipment of the armed forces of armenia in the karabakh economic zone of azerbaijan still continues in response to the large-scale provocation of armenia the azerbaijani army carries out local countermeasures and neutralizes the firing points of the statement

of the ministry of defense of azerbaijan that the shelling of the armenian party is an absolute lie; moreover, the military-political leadership prepared the information ground for this provocation, as evidenced by the daily misinformation about the alleged armenian shelling, as in all cases, this provocation was also resolved by the military-political leadership of azerbaijan, from the armenian side there are dead and wounded, traditionally for the armenian-azerbaijani confrontation in nagorno-karabakh, the parties accuse each other of armed provocations and call various settlements that suffered as a result of enemy shelling, in particular, armenia reports an attack on the city of horets sotk jerbuk , in turn, azerbaijan accuses armenia of shelling of the kalbezhan and lachyn districts of derzhkeskan,

oleksiy buryachenko, a political scientist, is in touch with us now. i congratulate you on the new day. i congratulate you on the new day. you are on the air, although it is important to focus on this, but let's spend the next 20 minutes talking about what it consisted of night and why exactly today was the escalation and mutual accusations directly of the attack by armenia and azerbaijan a p tetyana well you know to me eh still eh it seems why i say it seems because today the situation is different it is necessary to check very thoroughly and now we cannot clearly say which information corresponds to the truth on m- we can only analyze what was on the azerbaijani side says about the provocations of mining at positions on a and armenia says that it started er on as a result of

incomprehensible actions, as they say, and the shelling of populated areas, that is, as far as i'm concerned, the situation here requires, first of all, a major thorough investigation, but now it's already going on, and we know very well that this is a very long-lasting conflict around nagorno-karabakh, according to the results of the second nagorno-karabakh war, there were certain agreements, including on the lachyn corridor, because just recently, at the end of august, azerbaijan fully a-a occupied the city of lychyn, its historical but at the same time, armenia did not fulfill all its obligations in the conduct of its armed forces in the criminal corridor, this is an objective reality, and the parties have officially said about this several times at the official

international level, including in moscow, in the russian federation, which stands there like as peacekeepers, together with my father, we will directly remind you what duties to fulfill. because here again, azerbaijan says that they should have built a new road. azerbaijan completed its part of the new road much faster. armenia said that we still have time, the 23rd year inclusive, we will do it later directly russian peacekeepers who controlled this six-kilometer corridor that connects armenia and nagorno-karabakh. they said we will give you everything, although azerbaijan constantly reminded that the date is the fifth of august, then august 25. and these dates were directly violated. i understand to the russian peacekeepers who were supposed to hand over this corridor, that is, this date was constantly delayed, so what kind of obligations are you talking about, i am

actually talking about them myself and i am talking about right now, that corridor has not been completely handed over to the azerbaijani side on vot and there about the fate of azerbaijan continued constant fixation on the location of the armenian armed forces together with the russian peacekeepers, who are there for sure. for a very long time , these signals have already been going on for a long time. well, for more than one month, the official status of what is there or a contract, they are not there they have to free the territory so that azerbaijan can enter here. azerbaijan, in its turn , should have built and built, i will emphasize on the new road, a new alternative corridor from armenia to nagorno-karabakh, which it did not fully fulfill. about

such basic things, it is now possible to talk about midnight today , and you know how much we analyze the second karabakh war, let's say the tactics of the military of azerbaijan, it is very fast, it is very difficult to express it with the help of drones and artillery, and then they go to cross-border infantry forces, they very quickly occupy those other territories, yes, in principle, they liberated many settlements that historically belonged to azerbaijan, and there is no doubt why. by the way, the refusal was from the dkb military to intervene in this situation, the answer is very simple, because it is historically, well, legally, the territory of azerbaijan itself, or according to the normative

document of the dkb, they can only stand in defense of the state, i want this to be the case and now be laska does not refuse this help and is ready to call on belarus, russia directly, kyrgyzstan , tajikistan to help rescue, although again it is not about rescue, it is about a specific story with the repetition of the presence of the russian world, we can talk like that in groups and look well, what am i talking about if now after analysis of that war, if azerbaijan really wanted to break a new corridor there or to commit aggression against the armenians there, he would do it, that's what i'm leading to, and he would do it very quickly taking into account the difference in quality between azerbaijan's armed forces and, accordingly, the army, we also do not forget that now the russian contingent there has significantly decreased by the same amount, even according to official

information, part of it was transferred specifically to the ukrainian fronts, that's why. look. i am deeply convinced that some large-scale provocation took place there here and indeed here i completely share your point of view, but what is here without a russian trace , but it definitely did not work out, let's emphasize that you mean a large-scale provocation from armenia is correct, well, is there a sound in armenia or from the side of the russian federation? i say russia. which side is on the side of armenia, when we say azerbaijan, we mean turkey, although it is clear that the military is not present directly from the side of turkey, but turkey as a support as a strategic partner of azerbaijan in this case can combine these two countries and breed them in different camps just a little bit well, it seems so simple to me and there is no need to simplify again, but in the meantime at least globally to draw

in some way, our forces are located, i'm trying to simplify the morning, yes. well, globally, globally, yes, but if you go a little deeper, then it is not so, because i am deeply convinced that the increase in the presence of the russian federation on the territory of armenia, even more so, the introduction of ukrainian troops - this will definitely not work plus, neither armenia nor azerbaijan, nor the resolution of their long-standing conflict, it will only bring harm to their territory, peace to russia, and, accordingly, the full implementation of further provocations will suffer from this, in fact, we are great we understand the population of azerbaijan and the population of armenia, so it seems to me that there were some shady, perhaps, agreements between putin and pashayan. yes, that some kind of military provocation will be carried out. yes, to which it is

possible that azerbaijan will react, and perhaps they themselves it took place, you need to look at the fact that today's broadcast began, that everyone here needs to understand this situation very thoroughly. tell me, please . we will find out later. and it continues in 1987. let me remind our viewers what it is about. is this a confrontation, this ethnic conflict between armenia and azerbaijan from 1987 to the present during the first karabakh war ended in 1994, most of the territory of the former nagorno-karabakh autonomous region with a predominantly armenian population came under the control of the newly created and friendly nagorno-karabakh republic, namely yerevan, that is, armenia. and the armed conflict itself was frozen for a long time, the hot stage of the confrontation repeated in 2020, when, as a result of a month and a half war, azerbaijan, with the support of

turkey, took control of five places, four towns, 247, as well as the entire iranian border of azerbaijan, and in general, the number of victims of the conflict over the years is estimated at almost 50,000, when we take the second karabakh war, which ended in in november of the 20th year then and then six and a half thousand people died and in 2022 the current september escalation against the armenians on the azerbaijani border in the region of nagorno-karabakh is already 6 in a row the first mutual shelling took place as early as january 11. then three armenian servicemen were killed, shots rang out on the border almost a month later, on february 6, but the next incident took place already at the end of march, then the azerbaijani military was able to take the height and a settlement in the conflict zone, and then there were breaks until the third of august of the month of azerbaijan announced the capture of several heights

. in fact, the army of azerbaijan says that latsysh was forcibly settled by armenians. oleksiy, this is already a question for you , and now with that armenian in lashyn, there is a place, and here. where will they move to? but from azerbaijan, they say, is it our territory, do what you want, you have to leave, so participate directly . literally today reminded me of armenia's accusations of mining such conflict areas, and the day before america agreed to allocate 2 million dollars for the demining of the southern caucasus, that is,

here it seems that the facts are woven together and such armenia mined these territories that in fact belong to whom and it is interesting how this proposal to allocate two million ended for demining and today he already called koshenyan er blinke well, they already discussed the fact that this situation is not acceptable , please comment on these other calls and demining is possible, it seems to me that after all, there is a very thorough provocation on the part of the russian federation, and if we evaluate even the last, let's say, military actions, there, well, you mentioned the capture of several heights, often by the azerbaijani side . according to the consequences of the second karabakh war , the larvae had to pass, and accordingly the larvae, as you mentioned just now, were under the control of azerbaijan, and

here are the same heights that you mentioned there, there are three of them, and they are, let's say, key heights that are on let's say that they exercise real control over the lychyn corridor, i.e., the bus. their obligations, which they categorically refused to fulfill, here you know legally how this situation is not cool, but nagorno-karabakh is the territory of azerbaijan and there is no discussion at all, in fact, neither in the odkb nor in russia the federation is not in the united states of america, that is, well, in principle, nowhere, but the conflict is involved,

which you mentioned, yes. there, a lot of armenians were imported to the children of nagorno-karabakh. all the events are already unfolding around this. well, that is, who will support whom in this conflict with the united states of america. i think that they support the real integrity of course and they will oppose the occupation of mountain ships from the side of both armenia and the russian nation, but the whole world wants to agree, please, get your attention, and at one time, after the second karabakh war, russia offered its services,

let 's say so. peaceful, and russia was supposed to be the guarantor of these peaceful things, we can clearly see that russia is definitely not a peacemaker, but it will only incite possible wars wherever it is, through provocations or even through direct attacks. i myself i think that including this is literally another phrase of the delaying of the csto countries, including the conflict, you and i can now assume because in reality this is when this spark begins, of course we need to dig into the reasons, but here i really want to agree with you, but if you said that russia withdrew part of the contingent from nagorno-karabakh and transferred it to ukraine, why should it provoke the situation directly if it does not have enough forces, although we have 102 military bases there, and in general, all the bases and all positions as other experts say. i was there last

night just studying the situation. now the situation is extremely acute because everyone is standing opposite each other, that is, the military can literally see and hear what the other side is talking about. six months ago, there is no way, now, how many forces oppose each other, they are equal, they are unequal, tatiana’s answer here is very simple , in fact, the two key factors, the first one, on this on psychologically, they will be allowed to speak well, i have on attention of the russian federation about itself not only as an aggressor state, an occupying state, a state sponsor of terrorism and a terrorist state in itself. yes, and in this context it will change certain public attitudes and russia will already be perceived by a certain part of the population in a specific and in this conflict between armenia and

azerbaijan as a peacemaker, that's what it's all about and the involvement in this process of communication with the fact that there are really few russian forces left here, the absolute right of other countries of the csto and also this will contribute to this process, and we saw at the last summit of the ukrainian democratic party of ukraine many people will be surprised, but the same dog is the head of the odkb and that is, now the question arises about the viability of vodokan as such, yes, of course, there is still no proven fact of azerbaijan's attack on armenia, but there is already an appeal by the president of armenia to the odkb it is possible that the management of some peacekeepers is involved, we do not know the text or appeal of that

according to the law of ukraine, he has already said that he will also turn , that is, not only with help to russia, specifically 500, or will he include in the dcb and drag out the same council without the un, the same washington on the father excuse me for the slang kasha malasha da in which even there no one really can gather 100%. that's why i immediately said at the beginning of our broadcast that i see here the russian trace on her er, so to speak, the full involvement of the military in this conflict of the odkbrista and the federation and so on it will definitely not go to the advantage, not to armenia, not to the grain , all here, moreover, you can draw parallels to this russian trail, because nagorno- karabakh, no matter how they try to impose it on him, and maybe he perceives russia as a peacemaker, but actually in ukraine, russia proclaims them as peacekeepers, people are sitting without water, without gas, without electricity, the same thing now, the gas pipeline and gas remain the main problem of nagorny kravakh, and this is not the southern country

at all. banal things that provide them with life, that is, in essence, the situations are extremely similar, i deeply convince you that azerbaijan did not hold back the confederation as peacekeepers." in this by a million percent because, by the way, when they started their war in baku, at that time i flew out of ukraine on the 22nd, on the 23rd i flew to baku and then already there i got to ukraine at the invitation of the government of azerbaijan then i would not have been in those territories in principle, which is a consequence of the second karabakh war, to honestly forgive because colleagues from they are taking our marathon further. i am forced to stay. oleksiy buryachenko, a political scientist, was in touch with us . i want to share one more piece of news

. in the south, the ukrainian military is holding its position despite provocations by the russians. weapons and equipment by two control points and aimed at the radio electronic warfare station to dispel occupation myths about the restoration of bridges by fire control applied to the antonov bridge its unfitness for use by the enemy was confirmed once again, the loss of 59.6 tanks, five heads of 152 caliber, including self-propelled headquarters insta-s, a command penalty machine and a control machine, 12 units of other auto-counting machines »da now we pass the word to the first channel of public broadcasting, the only news together we are strong armed forces need drones do your part