the bosphorus and dardanelles passed to the russians, and then the anglo-french positions in the mediterranean would be threatened, and with the help of technical superiority, it turned out to be more adequate than the concept of total war with mass recruitment and similar things. the actual technical superiority of the british and the french was clear . even in russian satirical works , at least the same liskova in the leftist a-ah na- actually, well, i would not want to belittle the achievements of our enemies, she drew the right conclusions in fact, after the defeat in the crimea, conscription was canceled and in the 60s, a major military

reform took place and russia switched to a conscript army, and this was completed successfully, the conquest of central asia was quite effectively waged against turkey in 1977 and 1978, when constantinople remained there literally one transition and well, that is, you cannot say that russia sings defeats . they just know how. then such a situation arose when england and france fought against russia directly into the current war, the current war russia hoped that this would not happen and as we can see they didn't get to this point, if you read the truth in russian telegram channels, it turns out that we have englishmen there , why? and here, black americans have been fighting for a long, long time, but in fact it is not

so far, and nato has not done anything, and then it took and inflicted and i think that that lesson was learned, the problem is that it has passed. it will soon be 200 years. well, it will not be soon. it will be 200 years, and during that time, the lessons of that war have actually ceased to be relevant for russia, especially for us. that is, we we will go now let's talk about three actual wars, and then we'll get to that, uh. and why is it that russia today, not only did not calculate its forces, but probably also made mistakes that could become fatal for it in the future, they are already becoming fatal on the battlefield, and we are suffering losses and of course, our infrastructure is being destroyed, civilians are dying, houses, and the economy, but we still hold our land, and in fact the enemy is retreating from the territories that he initially

occupied after this first unexpected sudden strike, so we let's talk about these lessons of the russians now. well, it is important here that after all it was not a war of such a scale or, er, so painful, not so painful, it was obviously a defeat for the russians, that after all, the russian empire resisted, not only that it resisted, it became stronger eh- i learned certain lessons, well, it is true that the war was started by nicholas i and ended by alexander ii, but the fact is that it was not the kind of war that would globally change anything in russia, well, just like how in the empire, on the contrary, on the contrary , even something went better. you think this is this the war in europe was simply not considered as something that could cause significant wounds to the formation of the russian empire. that is, i understand that there was a certain local goal of the states that fought with russia. well, russia itself is, in principle, visible in this war because it was necessary to get in front of the turks. as they say, there would have been no war. and there was no such goal to destroy and weaken russia

. as far as i understand, you have to think about such a goal, and actually, well, i don’t know, it’s actually an invention of the twentieth century . and theirs was about change er, of some regime, when the allies defeated napoleon, they restored the bourbon rule, but did not dismember france from france, the country was not threatened by anything, so the napoleonic conquests were taken from it, but it was absolutely normal , so i don’t think that it occurred to anyone at all that the russian empire was necessary to destroy as such and all the more so in the middle of the 19th century. it was technically impossible. actually, i would not agree with the fact that russia did not undergo any transformations. the russian empire before the lviv war was still nothing feudal

an unrestricted monarchy with slavery as the basis of the economy, on the other hand, after the crimean war, the russian empire is a modern, well, at least a plus-minus modernized empire in which slavery no longer exists and capitalism is beginning, the industrial revolution is again important for ukraine because it begins in the donbas , therefore certain changes after all, the consequences of this war took place eh, did europe consider this war seriously, the fighting took place on six fronts and in the balkans, in the crimea, in the caucasus, on the white sea, eh, not eh, and not far away st. petersburg itself, on the dutch islands in the baltic sea and on the sea of ​​okhotsk, in petropavlovsk, in kamchansk, not everywhere was successful for the british

and french, but the fact remains that 0.75% of the world war is about uh, small, small, and the fact that it ended the way it ended it's because the british and the french won the most important e-e that they wanted the complete destruction of the black sea fleet and the impossibility of russian aggression against the balkan possessions of turkey and the world e-e it was not fundamentally moment in the 19th century, we are now moving on to another battle, which was probably painful, and it's not that painful, you know it like a slap on the pizza, uh, pulled up with pride. i mean the battle of cesima, when the russian fleet well, he sailed there for a very long time in this sea, for six months

or how long they got there, but he was defeated by the japanese, and here we will talk again about the reasons. i understand that the reason is probably similar to the crimean defeat, but and the lessons are here and again, that's how much this one is the defeat in sushima was more painful and perhaps even higher for the russian empire . i wouldn’t say that sushima was much more painful than sevastopol. in the end, in the japanese war, i don’t know, maybe it was more humiliating. er, it has little to do with er history, or even more so the evolution of military technologies. as such, in the end of the japanese war, not a single japanese soldier was on russian territory, and in the crimean war, in the city of such sailors, they had to give up

the russian russian public everything responded to the mayor no less violently, the problem is that simply who is closer to us and what is left of it shows more evidence than sevastopol. therefore, one may get the impression that the whole thing was somehow even more humiliating, although the consequences were similar and there and there russia completely lost its fleet just completely closer uh, the reasons for the defeat are absolutely similar uh, japan turned out to be technically stronger than russia, and i just relatively recently, maybe for several months, wrote a tonal article in which i argued that it was precisely the japanese war against russia from the point of view of

from the point of view of the current balance of power, not afghanistan, not the finnish winter war, but rather the russo-japanese war , because uh, russia at that time outnumbered japan by about three times the number of people it does now, and russia outnumbers ukraine by three times, as well , uh, japan had a technical advantage thanks to the help of western allies in front of all the british, on the other hand, the russians did not receive, in principle, any help from their even imaginary allies, both countries went into debt as a result of the entire war, japan even more than russia and actually like ukraine today he spends more other people's money than his own, but the fact remains that the whole world cheered on japan, and those who, in fact, if the japanese war was

defeated in it ended with a revolution in russia, the same way and the current war will end at least with a coup d'état, there are already separate russian telegram channels well, from among those who are a little more intellectual than the average, it has long been known about the land defeats of the russians against the japanese , not only in the fleet, it was all possible, sooner or later the russian state will be shaken from the japanese didn't take russian russian cities, the japanese didn't reach moscow or st. petersburg, that's actually not necessary, and i don't really believe that the ukrainians will be able to reach moscow, well, at least

on their own without the help of the polish army or the american army there. and in the japanese war and again , er, both then and now, there were certain er changes, well, at least i hope they will be in russia absolutely. uh, the russians didn't hold the levers of governing the country and it slipped first into the first world war and then into the revolution. but that's another story, but now the story is working a little because now vladimir putin's uh, such voices are already being heard in moscow, you know some people have become bolder, because in russia only the central government is weak somewhere, the central government immediately appears boldly on the ground, and even the deputies of the st. petersburg municipal deputies and moscow deputies from the

lomonosov district are already demanding putin's resignation, that is, they dared to demand not i think that of their own free will. i understand that all these deputies in one way or another have curators and investors. that's why it's not. i don't think that it's just the opinion of individual deputies. they didn't think. they didn't think . to the second one to the last i believe that everything in the country is fine, almost to the point of denying his own in march of this year. so, in the same way, putin is told that well, he does not know . is approaching collapse, that's why he probably has to go, like nikolai, my friend, there are such comparisons, nikolai the second and um world war i. in fact, it's already a war. which, well, was the beginning of uh, a magnificent bloody funeral for the russian empire, which well, i don't think it's the empire disappeared. it simply began to disintegrate , which continues to this day in various forms . the soviet union also existed. and now it’s the russian federation again, but then it started according to your

opinion. that’s why the first world war became the last war of the russian empire . the land is still in it, or in the defeats, the reason or the defeats were the result of the fact that the russian empire was already dying, as they say, the russian empire was doomed because the most important issue was not resolved in it, namely, the lands today with you modern present modern a person does not even imagine how serious the agrarian problem was in all societies before industrialization , not only in russia and in germany, people in france. they were solved in the same way . there are several exceptions, for example in in the scandinavian countries, where the rulers actually had great land ownership hmmm, there

was no such thing as a magnate and the mammoths supported this small, large land ownership, and russia belonged to the ultras of such countries, and the problem was simply that land was needed to take the land, it had to be taken from the landowners, and the landowners were obviously opposed to this year did not solve this problem at all, that is, the peasants still had to pay for the land for 20 years to fulfill their obligations in favor of their lords , even after from the year 905 these redemption the payments were ska anyway, the people had to have enough of the actions of the earth, which was already in the village, stolypin came

up with the idea of ​​the great colonization of siberia and the far east if he had not been shot if his m. the son would somehow be able to come to all this through reforms or in a softer way, but the problem is the death of the empire. this is precisely the fact that the russian soldier was a peasant. he did not understand what kind of cholera he was fighting against the germans because his country does not give out land, and in the first years, when there was still a belief that we would now defeat the germans, that we would now receive reparations , that the good king, on the occasion of such a victory,

would start distributing land to all of us, well, the army received it by the end of the 15th year, even by the beginning of the 16th and in the 16th year there was a psychological breakthrough, it became clear that this name in and actually what happened in the 17th year, at the beginning of the 17th year, it was a conspiracy of generals against the inept leadership of the russian empire without even being headed by the chief of staff they believed oleksiv, they saw what they saw. they drew the wrong conclusion. they thought that if the tsar was overthrown and replaced by another tsar with his brother mikhail, then maybe something would change, and in general , even in the alternating republic, they did not achieve anything because the average russian soldier did not

want to fight the russian resourceful soldier wanted from the land and as soon as the bolsheviks said that such land and let's go to the rear let's divide the land to the rear as in the 17th 10 million of the russian army simply melted into it well there were attempts somehow this to settle and return to return the death penalty to ukraine, well, only ukrainianized muslim units there were also formed so that the compatriots could defend themselves better, side by side with their own people. the russian empire could not solve the issue with the land, and the first world war was simply a trigger we now have a trigger beacon with a hook so that the peasants themselves in the summer of the 17th year there was an agrarian revolution when half of the landowners' estates were divided. by the way, even

hetman skoropadskyi's land was divided like this and that's all and then why continue to fight and continue to fight for nothing and the bolsheviks were forced to simply hmm create their red army from scratch a-a well, the white guards then also er-er relied more on volunteers than er than on mobilized ones that's all somehow, all these reasons are superimposed on each other, if this war had not happened, there would have been some other one that would have led to the same result. well, that's why it fell apart and it seems to me that this is exactly what is happening with russia, the middle of the 8th year and what is happening now it's just russia's attempt to delay the end of the kremlin's attempt to drag out the end, if they had won this war, they

might have won there for another decade, but since it has already been lost for russia, now its collapse is simple. on youtube, uh, people also write uh, different opinions , they ask, are you published somewhere? sergey, here i am redrawing the question for you, because it is important, maybe people want to read it, well, they are interested in listening to you and they want to read you in addition to what they saw on the wind espresso, say whatever you want please, where do i publish so that you cannot read your works on facebook on serhiy romanenko, where i post links to my materials of such bozhecki on radio svoboda on gazeti.ua in local stories on the left bank e-e reprinted on obozrevatel and glavkomi search by surnames not can you not be able to pray so i answered this question

for our viewers and the first thing they ask is why there is so much about russia let's talk about us about us in principle these days we are talking about why i pay so much attention to russia in the worldview project i first of all, i understand very clearly that the problem with ukraine now is that we still have more than one war with russia, er, more than one war with russia . in the 17-21st year, these liberation wars. well, the same skoropadsky wanted an alliance with russia, so later it actually cost him the hetmanate and he fled from kyiv, er, and the socialists led by vynnychenko, well, that is, there were many problems. why did people not understand what is russia ? now we have seen this country. this is the depth of russia here we have in the territory of ukraine from eh, roughly speaking, eh chernobyl zone, ending with eh chongar, and from e there, zhytomyr oblast, when they were in zhytomyr oblast, ending with kharkiv oblast and donetsk oblast, well

, and we must study and defeat them now, that’s why i myself i set these tasks, of course we are talking about ukraine because it is now, but it is now our problem, but russia is our problem, it is the same as saying that a person is sick with oncology, you know, and why do you talk so much about oncology, are you interested in doctors , clinics, chemotherapy? well, why do you need it? go plays football drink coca-cola kiss girls well, because i have cancer no, yes, of course so what to talk about it well, let's talk about it because we need to heal we also have to heal from russia because to win and even on the battlefield it will be one problem you'll see, then it will be a completely different problem to heal from this russia, that 's why i answered the audience so simply so that you don't understand why we're talking about it, but i want us to now talk about another war, well, very briefly, because russia won this war, well, no russia soviet union because ukraine at that time gave millions of people to the war and millions of victims and resources were spent world war ii is meant but by and large the soviet union lost this war and only with the help of lisa it began to roll back the crow, well , huge human resources but also lend-lease because people don't win wars, wars are won by people with weapons, that's

why the soviet union, by and large, lost its first war before 1941, and then it was a different story. and now i would like you to listen to marshal zhukov, who speaking from the podium at red square after the victory parade said who won in this second world war putin will now say that russia itself would have defeated even the non-union republics let's listen to georgy zhukov and then continue to our sacred land and the other day the ball is against us by no means of our sword

in america, great britain well, plus other countries as well, er, professor germany is hanged in pairs, so that no one forgets who won the second world war, but i just wanted a cemetery for the world, that's exactly what we won't do and spend a lot of time in our country literally two minutes. i would like to ask you about ukraine in this war. and over these six months, how has ukraine changed, its army, what have i been taught, and what are our future prospects in the war with russia? listen, i am not a military expert, politically, morally , psychologically, because it is clear that the military is there, they are dealing with their weapons, who where, tactics, strategy, they are there, they are doing it cool,

let them do it, and we will talk about exactly what is in the head, what is in the heart, first of all, because by 2014 , it is obvious that some part of ukrainians well, i do not i would say that half. it would be too strong, but a third definitely asked the russian unionist partners and so on. in the end, someone in our country voted for the communists, for yanukovych for the upszh, and even when hostilities began in the 14th year, when crimea and donbas were occupied the number of pro-russian and pro-soviet ukrainians decreased, but by about 20 percent, supporters of this

eastern vector of integration, on the other hand, since february 4, 2022 , the pro-russian russian agenda simply ceased to be for ukraine forever relevant and i consider the most important of all possible consequences of this war, it will be impossible to rebuild later and it is even better. and the fact that we are sitting with a decent ass on two chairs, now russia will be connected with them, now the vector of ukraine's development is exclusively the west . i thank you very much, mr. serhiy thank you who joined with pleasure listened to you with interest and uh, for sure our viewers listened to you with pleasure with interest

i thank you very much serhii gromenko ukrainian historian publicist public activist candidate of historical sciences and he was an employee of the ukrainian institute of national memory in the years 14-16, and i want to say at the very end that you can propose your topics to our world program , it is more history, philosophy, er, cultures, we talk about it, that's why there is my telegram channel evening cotton go there write, you can search on facebook. and vasyl winter in latin. subscribe, write your wishes, i will consider them, take them into account, because we still have to work in the interests of the audience, but also offer the audience what we consider necessary right now, that's why, take care, write, and also , like, spread espresso in social networks, subscribe, comment, it's important now, there should be ukrainian content, and we should still look at this, uh, our world, i'll say goodbye until 7:15 p.m. we will meet on the big airwaves now stay with the press my colleagues will work after me and it will be interesting for sure you will be interesting

with us today take care goodbye thank you nine-year-old anastasia mihno about the fate of this girl for more than four months nothing unfortunately, the details of the route of the disappearance are also unknown. i am also lying. i only know that the child lived in the city of lysychansk in the luhansk region. it is likely that nastya was there with her mother and the connection with them was cut off at the end of april. in july, the city completely came under the control of the occupiers and have the family moved somewhere or are they still there? but they just can't tell me something about themselves, at least because of the lack of communication, i don't know, so i'm asking especially the residents of lysychansk that she has light blond hair and dark eyes, she looks like a girl maybe a little older than nine years old if anyone has seen her or knows where she might

be now don't delay call us on the magnolia child tracing service hotline at the short number 116 000 from any mobile operator free of charge or write to the chat bot of the tracing service children in the telegram, i have another story about missing children and every occupied territory , this time in the kharkiv region, it is about the city of izyum and two yurchenko brothers, 17-year-old hleb and six-year-old mark, were hiding from shelling in the winter and in there were and were hiding in the woods, the neighbors were being modeled and there were already basements hiding. hleba and mark yurchenko are looking for their grandfather. unfortunately, there are no photos of his grandchildren. he is an elderly man and does not know how to use a computer and social networks, so he cannot send us a link to the accounts of relatives, say on facebook,

but he knows that they are, therefore, i am appealing to everyone who recognized the yurchenko family from the city of izyum in the kharkiv region to respond. maybe someone has their photo or a link to their profiles on social networks. if so, call us on the tracing service hotline children at the short number 116,000 or write to the chat bot in telegram. if we have photos of the missing , this will significantly increase the chances of finding them. now i will tell you a little more about the yurchenko family, maybe this information will help you recognize them. they lived in izyum there they lived there for a year, they lived there this was my son oleksiy and my daughter-in-law maria and with them my daughter-in-law mother larisa ivanovna there were five of them there, the yurshink family lives at the address city of izyum 9 shota rustaveli street father oleksiy mother maria

their six-year-old son's name is mark, and the older one is 17-year-old hleb. i know that hlib studied at a local raisin school, so i am addressing in particular his classmates and friends who may see me now and understand that it is precisely about this hlib yurchenko. who can send his photo? knows about the fate of the family, call