and the chances of finding them now i will tell you a little more about the yurchenko family, maybe this information will help you recognize them in kharkiv well, they lived in izyum , they were my son oleksii and my daughter-in-law maria and with them my daughter-in-law larisa ivanovna, they were there in p' the yurchenkos live at the address izyum city, shota rustaveli street, 9. father oleksii, mother maria, their six-year-old son is called mark , and the older one is 17 years old hleb . now they see and understand that it is about this yurchenko bread, who can send his photo . does anyone know about the fate of the family, call us at the

child tracing service on the hotline 116,000,000 calls from any mobile operator are free, or send photos of the yurchenko family to the chat - bot services for searching for children in telegram. believe me , any information is important, because mr. oleksii, who has been searching for his relatives for more than six months , knows nothing about their fate. he was only from the left bank to the end. well, he was broken and they did not they were able to go anywhere, there is no electricity, there is no gas, there is no cover, they are broken, they can and are happy to contact us, they can't and we can't contact them. of course, the most important information for oleksiy is to find out that everything is fine with his family, but it is important get a photo of the yurchenko family, this will significantly speed up the search for missing people. i hope for feedback from

everyone who recognized the yurchenko family. i told you only a few stories about missing children in general since the beginning of the war. we received more than 2000 requests fortunately, most of the children have already been found, but the fate of many remains unknown and everyone can help find them. take a minute and go to the website of the magnolia children's search service, here to view all the photos of the missing, you may be the one to recognize someone and eventually help to find some beings are surprised by the toilet in the house and we from ukraine can insure cars even if you are in the

toilet hotline finance insurance of course online so that ukrainians don't think about so that they don't talk in the first place anyway war comes out war and ours victory seven days a week from monday to monday seven different spheres of human activity sports culture politics eight presenters of espresso journalists experts opinion leaders in real time about the most relevant events through the prism of war every day author's projects on espresso events the most important events events that are happening right now and affect our life, of course, the news feed reports about them, but we don’t know much about what is happening, we need to understand antin

borkovsky and the invitation experts soberly evaluate events, analyze them, modeling our the nearest future is that saturdays at 1:00 p.m. with a repeat at 10 p.m. studio event with anton borkovskyi naispresso 6,000 m² of territory since the beginning of september against the background of the advance of the ukrainian military in slobozhanshchyna and donbass, the russian army sent shelling of kharkov, there were massive strikes on the city center and energy infrastructure at the same time, the russian occupiers continue to lose manpower and equipment in ukraine, in general, as of the morning of september 13, russia lost 53,300 people in ukraine in the last day alone, the armed forces of ukraine were liquidated 350 occupiers since the beginning of the great war, the russians have already lost in ukraine 2175 tanks 4662

armored combat vehicles 1279 artillery systems 311 rocket salvo systems 165 air defense means 244 aircraft 213 helicopters 3469 units of automotive equipment 15 boats boats - 233 cruise missiles 9004 units of special equipment 117 the enemy suffered the greatest losses in the kharkiv and donetsk directions putin's defeat in ukraine lavrov visa-free to the united states of america eu does not want to see in russian tourists, we will talk about this during the next hour, contact us volodymyr yelchenko, ukrainian diplomat, permanent representative of ukraine to the united nations in 2015-2019 and ambassador extraordinary and plenipotentiary of ukraine to the united states of america in 2020-2021 mr. volodymyr dobrogo day good

health to you, i'm glad you joined our broadcast good day sergey glory to ukraine glory to the heroes let's start our conversation mr. volodymyr with the results 200 days have passed since the beginning of the great war in russia against ukraine on the air we quite often we talk about how these 200 days changed ukraine and all of us, and how the world has changed during this time and whether these changes that have already taken place in the world are enough to oppose those who are trying to fight against civilization. i think that the world has changed very much from one on the other hand, it seems to me that the system of collective security, which existed before the beginning of this year and was based on statutes, is no longer working properly. and secondly, you know

, sympathy for ukraine has grown radically in the world the world is considered strong during these six months, the world is convinced that ukraine is strong and it can overcome russia, we all remember how they gave two days, four days, two weeks and so on, everyone remembers it well and knows it, but we are not only they resisted, but they began to beat the russians very seriously, in fact, it was from the first day, but now we are already talking about a very serious counteroffensive, and this cannot be ignored in the world, and i think this is very important in the context of the new sanctions packages against russia and in the context of e-e new ones supply of weapons because, uh, you know, the number of skeptics has decreased a lot, we understand that there were many politicians in the west, uh, i won't name the countries, they are known to everyone who thought that russia

is better . putin was even able to say that ukraine should cede part of its territory, then it was rejected immediately and this is very good, today no one is talking about it, remember that six months ago i am not talking about a year ago, there was no one there 5 years ago uh, he didn't even uh, he mentioned that uh, well, let's say it's possible to free crimea from the military path, everyone is ready, uh, well, the classic way, that it will take some time, that you have to negotiate, that this issue is not timely, eh, they gave an example, eh it is related to the baltic countries, which were under occupation for more than 50 years, and they said, what about crimea? maybe something similar will happen there. we have to wait a few decades, and then, well, somehow, something there has been

destroyed, it's a change of power in russia, and so on , they are already saying today. absolutely frank about what crimea can be liberated by the armed forces of ukraine with the help of western weapons, er, well, it is clear that this is the first line of our armed forces, our command, president zelenskyi, er, hm, and it’s not for us to talk about it, but this confidence in the world is that ukraine can do it to do, it adds optimism to us and to our allies and friends, mr. volodymyr, do you agree with the statement that now there is a war between er-e democratic countries, not even between er-e ukraine and russia or russia and ukraine, but between two worlds, that is, one world that wants to develop democratic way, well, conventionally, the name is civilization between the authoritarian world, which can conventionally be called the

horde world, yes, i agree, i would only add to this that there is a third world. these are the countries that uh, well, they sit uh and watch what will happen next and that is why i emphasize the importance of our successes on the fronts, because in this third world, and among them there are such countries as the same china as india as brazil. that is, these are not open sympathizers of russia, but these are countries that would like so that it's all somehow so it ended without them in some kind of peace and well, by and large, everything is the same for them, will ukraine give in because of this? the main thing is for this to end as soon as possible. and there are still many countries in africa. during the last month, we especially saw how

e.e. the un or the un security council e.e. russia tried to use it in the situations surrounding the zaporizhzhia npp when they went there with heavy equipment, then there was a mission of the megatheque that came to the e.e. zaporizhia npp in energodar , we see how e.e. russia is methodically trying to use this high tribune the highest tribune in the world and was there or is there any certain way to avoid manipulation by the russians in the organization of the united nations and in what way to do it so that the highest tribune in the world does not turn into for the russians to use it for propaganda for their own interpretation of what is happening in ukraine in favor of the kremlin, unfortunately, russia will continue to

use these high voniv tribunes to promote its negativity the speech in the middle of the pensions is shown on russian television or there is a copy-show. well , it is presented as, well, everything that happened there, that is, the narratives that are heard by western delegations and even from non-western ones are not given, because, for example, if we talk about any discussion in the un security council, then if uh, well, at the beginning of this active phase of the war, some countries such as the same india as brazil, which, by the way, are members of the security council, mexico are still there, uh, in today's composition, they uh, well, yes so to speak, they refused to speak that is, they did not say anything, they used this phrase so traditionally that they also strengthened the territorial integrity of ukraine, hmm, but they

did not even name russia as the cause of these wars . well, if you don't blame russia yet, then you should already name this country as the cause and source of all the problems that have arisen, and first of all, this was manifested precisely during the discussion about the situation in zaporizhzhia nuclear plant no, but one more example is one of the last security meetings that russia called with such a strange name, such as the problem of the supply of western weapons in ukraine, or do they say it only fuels the conflict, prolongs it, and they used it, i think for two purposes, first , there was a thesis that by refusing these

arms supplies, they would lead to the spread of weapons around the world in africa, in the middle east, they would fall into the hands of terrorists, and this would create even more danger that is, it is so obvious the intention to pull on its side those countries that can , hypothetically, suffer from this, and the second is what they say, if it were not for the supply of weapons , the russians would have been there long ago. all of you sat at the negotiating table with the ukrainians and agreed on something, but it did not work once again, that is , it is not worth commenting on the speeches of the american delegation or the british group here, it is clear that they fully support and they destroyed all the russian arguments, but those countries that i named and others there , the same african countries, such as gabon or

ghana, which previously, as i said, refused. and now they simply said that, well, the question is clear, but the problem is not that, but the problem is that russia has started and the conflict, that is, so gently, gradually, they are already starting to call russia by their names but nevertheless in the modern form we need security of course they are completely impotent, well at least in the ukrainian issue and there is also syria where, let's say so, the successes are small afghanistan the middle east eh everything everything is standing everything everything is frozen and first of all 99% in russia there is a right to introduce which she either uses or constantly threatens that she will hang around there and block any resolution that will not meet her interests well, what are the interests of russia, we are already somewhere and these last six months of

tv channels are completely reforming the un as a whole and primarily to the dangers of the un, but this is a very difficult path and i do not think that we will see the result quickly, however, there are statements by the united states of america of this country in pan, except for the forces of ukraine, no one has recently told us that the american signa is ready to start a serious discussion by phone to submit a security statement. they did not say this before. it is clear that this will not lead to the cancellation of the right of veto, which is also held by the americans and four other countries besides russia in the so-called nuclear five. but that is not the case. less well, for example, the fact that the americans began to sing the resolution of the assembly, which was recently passed by the public teinstein, is the essence of this resolution is that if a country or more than one country applies the right to strike the security council.

then they must explain the reasons for such a vote in the un general assembly, it is clear that this non-cancellation is legal, but it complicates things , let's say yes, this mechanism, is it an institution? so they did not promise the reform of the security council, they have been talking about it for 30 years in the united nations and nothing special yet there were no cosmetic procedures, no, but they didn’t change much, but one way or another. well, even this war, in principle, is increasingly making sidekicks, and something needs to be done, otherwise ion will turn into finally, well, in such a type of league of nations, and we all know the fate of the league of nations. it simply died or was dispersed and due to its complete inability to solve any political problems, i wanted to remember the year 46, when the league of nations ceased to operate, and in 45- in the same year, the un was created as an

organization when the united states of america did not join the league of nations in principle. this organization existed there for 26 years, if i am not mistaken, and this is also how the un actually came into being. could it be that after this of the great russian-ukrainian war because it is the biggest the continental war has existed since the second world war with the largest victims and the most brazen violation of international law. will not a new organization emerge against this background, well, a prototype of the league of nations or the un, but in a different form, in which there will not be so much rights in the russian federation , which it inherited from the soviet union, this means membership in the soviet union, we

talked about this in the last program, about how they wrote a letter to the un in 1991 and said that they were the successors of the soviet union, and actually sat down place of the soviet union, although procedurally, russia still had to go through this path of joining the soviet security council, and well, all the procedural points of each new state, will there not be a third international organization that will emerge after this great war between russia and ukraine, because it is not only a war between russia and ukraine again let's return to the war of civilizations and hordes and it affects the interests of not only two countries literally a few months ago until today it is already becoming more more more well, if unreal, then much closer to reality, i once said such a phrase for which i was heavily criticized in ukraine , and outside of ukraine, that in order to

deform the united nations organization, the third world war is needed. well, they said where how is it? this is some kind of apocalypse. and when there is an apocalyptic such a forecast, there should be no such thing. maybe, but in fact , this war is already happening. it's just not like how we imagined it. we thought it would be something like the second world war, and god forbid it would be linked weapons, but uh, maybe it's a hybrid. maybe it really different, but in fact it is if it is not yet a world war, the fact that it is already a european or a civilizational war, as a matter of fact, they said it correctly. i completely agree, so let's look at the result . it will already be the notary of russia, which

we knew and know. even today and then, anything can happen, and it can really be either a reform of the security council or something will be done with the right at the top . it is not yet a hundred percent guarantee that everything will work, but it is better than having only russia's veto, which blocks everything and everything, there are other options for increasing the membership well, i am not in favor of this because, uh, imagine if the security council can't approve the decision eh, having 15 countries, so eh, will it be easier to sway their decision if there are 20 or 21 or 25 eh, i think it will be more difficult, on the other hand, there are countries

like germany, japan, the same india and beautiful in principle well, over the past 70 years, they have also become well over the states almost i would say they also have claims for permanent membership they were not such countries 70 years ago or more than 70 but today they are not. europe, but it also has its own problems, there are many of them, and someone needs to solve them for us. hmm, the main thing is ukraine, this is this war, but there are many other warriors in the world from whom we are as far away as those countries are far from our war, this is also necessary have in mind and so that it is possible to go by increasing

the membership and maybe by creating some other new organization, although you know some politicians like to repeat phrases that belong did we run and drive the un there? tomorrow we would have to create it again. well, it is possible to create it under a different name, you understand. well , the un charter begins with the fact that the security council must solve the problems of peace and security in the world. today, these security issues cannot be solved with all due respect to such problems as global warming, climate change, terrorism, economic decline, and many, many other things, but he cannot deal only with these problems , after all, there are still many specialized institutions

that deal with with this, how can you, with nuclear energy, with unesco, with issues of culture and education, and so on, and so on, and yet the un is the core of the un, it is the un security council, if it is unable to work effectively, then something is wrong in our house. we need to change something, let's see, by the way, uh, today just starts another session of the assembly data, it opens uh, and the session will start already, well, high- level discussions will begin in a week, and surely all these questions will be heard there. i think that the ukrainian delegation will too, whoever leads it she will also express her vision, including the issues that you are raising right now. it will be very interesting . listen to this, because in the end this will be the first big session of the gaming assembly, the next one after the start of a large-scale war.

what happened in september of last year. by the way, you already know that lavrov was not given an american visa in order to come to the un general assembly. what lavrov said, we will hear from you now, so i still have it, but i told my colleagues that they don't need to be reminded of the american the secretary general has an obligation to participate in the events, of course, he includes the general assembly, so let's see. well, for now, lavrov is waiting for a visa to the united states of america to fly to the un general assembly, uh, again, russia is saying uh, against the background of our counterattack in the kharkiv region, also in the south, in the kherson region, russia is again saying that we are not against sitting down at the

negotiating table with the ukrainian state, but these negotiations should be on our under the conditions that we should not do everything to now we have agreed on something because it will be much more difficult to agree on it in the future what did president zelenskyy say about this we can hear the feeling in my heart that we have relations with non-terrorists even terrorists can communicate because they know what they want they say i will release this plane. i need money, i will release people, give me money and a plane, there is no certainty that they will tell you that they will do it. i think that they will not, no one believes. as they say, it is not a handshake, comrades, this is what it is for. they did it and not even for that and in what format did he kill not according to the rules of war

and you were killed and he went to a peaceful person, raped, tortured and killed him, he is not a terrorist because if he did it for a stove, then who is he? what is he not even a terrorist, that is terrorist who do not know what they want and are ready to give an ultimatum, that's why they have to come and first become an enemy to another status so that we can open a diplomatic corridor with them to withdraw from our territories until the moment they become terrorists, they must withdraw, withdraw by this point, they must show the political will that they are ready to give back someone else's land, then we can talk about at least some corridors that open certain diplomatic steps, deputy head of the security council of the

russian federation medvedev says that this year's ultimatum is a children's warm-up before the demands of the future, he knows them, the total capitulation of the kyiv regime under the conditions of russia, and again we will hear from lavrov what he thinks about these negotiations as the president, that we are not against negotiations, we do not refuse to negotiate, for those who refuse, we must understand that the further they drag out this process, the more difficult it will be to negotiate. they are already telling me that negotiations can only be held after the victory of ukraine and then when russia withdraws from ukrainian lands, they will be for they are already talking to impose their conditions on us and in this they actively support them, even on takaya, there is london, washington, brussels, so if this is their choice, then we know a number of goals that were set by the president as part of a

special military operation, vladimir, i have a question for you, how an experienced diplomat, a person who represented ukraine at international tribunes, international organizations, do you see any prerequisites, how and when russia and ukraine can sit down at the negotiating table, and what can happen the subject of these negotiations. to be honest, i do not see such conditions at the moment. i carefully listened to what mr. lavrov said, and you know that i wanted to return for a moment to the issue of the american visa, and the other is going to tell this delusion from the podium and the assembly. and nothing else i can’t say. and whose word will it be, and by the way, to close the budget, uh, this topic in sections, uh, of

course, i don’t want to advise our american partner, they know perfectly well how to do it all themselves, but here it is