a positive answer is absolutely necessary, will there be such an answer tomorrow or by tomorrow? i am a supporter of the fact that one should be calm about this, first of all, no one owes us anything . which you say today, taras batenko , then recently, in the context of the counter-navigation of our troops in the kharkiv direction, they said the phrase, i definitely can, i won’t quote it, but it’s roughly that ukraine will stop where its troops remain interests, if possible. comment on this phrase and in the context of this. please tell me what factors in your opinion, eh, could now affect the submission, the demoralization of the russian army, that it is possible that it would even partially go without countersuppets, eh, and so on, although i think so it's obvious. we ca

n't hope for it for sure, but let's say the events in the dkb on the border, the events within the dkb on the border between armenia and azerbaijan, there are shipments between kyrgyzstan and e-e dagestan, we are a potential exit from the dkb of the cis military treaty of kazakhstan, i.e. putin remains alone. all these things. they can in some way affect the presence of the russian armed forces on our territory. thank you . i literally said that our armed forces will stop where the interests of our country will stop until the time when our interests do not suit us to stop. the armed forces of our country do not have any rights, but we must not repeat the mistakes that were made in our time. for example, our history is that everything must be done on time and now it is us who are those people who now live in our territory to carry out this historical let's say this historical mission

again i justice to protect our independence the rest of the rest our country lived free and independent and so that no one here was a king for us on our territory what concerns part of your question is really there there are so many difficult questions happening now, mr. how do they think that if they have a fifth article there, then in their documents there is a fourth article that they have to protect anyone if there is any of course, there will be no such attack, and everything is happening. confirmation that there are no yanams at all. we have to deal with people who are related. what concerns this process is directly related to the kazakhs. it is a big country . i once said about what it has today a dangerous situation because the russians dried up if the parishioners fulfilled the questions not in our country the next one is a must because kazakhstan here he is very important for the russians today this is already an

exceptional situation because if you if you are you following up on these uh-uh questions, uh-uh, did you follow up on what the leader of china did before going to the place where this meeting is today, he was directly in kazakhstan, he had a meeting with such a person there where you made a statement and what about territorial values ​​from kazakhstan is a matter of principle for them and they will insist that, in any case, this question should not be considered, this is a fundamental thing and this is the first and certain challenge to the russians so that they do not gossip about information, mr. oleksiy. i really liked your answer, natalia moseychuk eh, regarding how we should come to an understanding with those people who now live in donbas and crimea after the liberation of these territories, and this is in the context of this. even as a people's deputy, i said that in ukraine it is necessary to carry out re-passportization of the population,

what is meant if you want to be ukrainian if you want to get a new sample ukrainian passport, you have to pass a short exam on knowledge of the ukrainian language, knowledge of ukrainian history and personality, and especially say on camera that russia is the aggressor. if you pass the exam, you get a passport to ukraine should not have dealt with the issues that you did not emphasize when they directly went to the elections, such as, unfortunately, many and in themselves. it's interesting, but you have to understand that anyone is a rat who currently has a passport, so they can tell you anything in any language, but they will remain closed eyes. had uh interview at the invitation of colleagues who are currently present

and in the studio. i told him a very simple thing: we have to obey the laws regarding language. we have laws on language already adopted. they are exceptional. we just need to start abusing them. failure to comply with laws, failure to comply with our constitution . - this is the same disease that we are suffering from. let's say this is a certain time of our uh , young uh, development of modern conditions, uh, of our country, this is a year-and-a-half, and absolutely unacceptable, if today everyone would obey the laws of the constitution of our country, believe me i said that there was no need to raise the issue of language, it should simply be carried out, and those who do not carry it out should have an understanding of what it is for, it should be cleaned up, it should be calm and balanced, so why is it that in democratic countries there, everything is much calmer and there is no such thing. let's say so there, even journalists couldn't imagine that such a question should be asked. there we are with them, they are with us there, it's completely ridiculous, the laws of the country's territory must be obeyed, all films without exception, if someone is not satisfied, please once again

i emphasize, the world is big, pack your things, go, live anywhere. according to the countries of the world, the laws of the countries that you perceive for yourself are acceptable to you. well, how is it? if you have any details regarding the nighttime events of the road accident in kyiv with the presidential car , it would be interesting to hear uh, and then the second question. it is related to the general kyiv security agreement, which we are currently working on. we should be afraid of some additional threats to ukraine in the distant future or to our friendly neighboring countries in this connection. well, in continuation of the jokes that are going around today regarding the maps of 1918 and mr. zaluzhny, do you see prospects in

the distant future when the processes of disintegration of the russian federation begin possible annexation of ancient ukrainian territories to ukraine road accident, this is the president of our country, i cannot comment on the word, not as in ot this is not for the general public, this whole situation, the first question is what concerns the security forum which you just mentioned, i want to say that in the constitution we have a firm norm - nato is the only institution that i know of today in the world that provides protection to the members of the participants of this process, of course we can now move along the way and grope conditionally speaking, these or other alliances, which or other things are true for the next defense. there is a project called

synoji, we transferred it directly to the president's office, we transferred it to the ministry of foreign affairs, we are talking about the creation of alliances in timi countries that are really our partners, that would be, in our opinion, extremely, extremely important for our security at the current stage of development . uh, even on the territory we have in 191, we can put things in order in this, what concerns our country, and then life will show the opal oleksia, we see how now thanks to the help of our partners, we can bear blows on the bodies thanks to

uh, hee mars and other such long-range e-e artillery and the success that was also in the kharkiv direction, which is in the south, in this we see that we are indebted. now it will be now the preparation of the budget for 2023 is starting, and in particular, there is the question of financing the programs of the state defense order . an appeal to you so that you support and, on your part, lobby, raise issues on all possible platforms for you, or before one or other officials , that the missile program that the last few years ago, it was weak for us, and we had adequate funding so that we did not apply for chimarka or and so we to our e-e international colleagues and that we had our own ukrainian such a program,

in particular its neptune thunder two - this is what would be right now it would be very appropriate to strike at the far-off lands of these occupiers. thank you for convening . this is a question of defense orders in general, and there was a situation when non-military orders what they need, and the deputies in the committee decide by this time, this is a waste of practice it remains for the deputies to decide what they should dig into and what programs they should conduct. this is unacceptable. it started with mr. pashinsky, known to all. say yes and who is following the politician. i once again taught that it is necessary to take care of the interests of the state in a timely manner and not about some other things. today, for today, this is what often makes us when we make a decision, so let's make someone calm down today. let 's give him this or that tender.

from our budget, well, god would have money with it, but in our uh pocket money sometimes make political decisions. i want to remind you that on december 8, 2004, during the presidential elections, when russia tried to uh on the conditions of making changes to our constitution one more thing you could say was that the deputies swam and then they made such a completely unconstitutional decision when they took away the full powers of the president who was elected at the time and in such cases there were four on the road. and now we have the consequences of all these things, they are as follows you know things that are very unpleasant to mention, because i say once again if a person is a public official, if he is a politician with a capital letter, he should take care of the future generation of people who will feed on this territory and not solve

some of their petty issues there today so this is a big problem today, i think that after the events that are happening today, we are adults, we will have responsible decisions on all issues, not only on budget issues. we have a lot of questions about which we need to approach the issue from a statesman's point of view , the question was an interview with mr. danilov not so long ago on the youtube channel, a good long interview, i recommend that our audience also watch it about thanking mr. danilov for that interview a while ago, you really said what for in order for ukraine to come, it is enough to simply implement all the legislation, which is in a large percentage strong enough. just for the establishment of ukraine, there would be a desire to implement it. actually, i have no questions about this. to what extent do you understand, well, not you specifically, that

ukraine itself should enter the de-occupied territory after the ukrainian soldier with its values, and there is no repeat of the 14th year, when we just as victoriously liberated cities, liberated entire towns, later two years did not pass because we left everything as it was later, shariy licked and licked and all those whom we now declared state traitors and were forced to ban in this case already now that before the occupation actually happened, how firm is the political position not to leave everything as it was and yet establish a completely ukrainian agenda in the de-occupied territories without consideration. does anyone like it, don't they like it, do they want it, do you remember our conversation ? we look back at kyiv that someone must have the political

will, this people of ours must have the will, all our nations, it is crystallized today, it is undergoing such a test of strength and, believe me, i am no longer i'm sure that those guys and girls who today are lambasting our country, they are not economical, they will allow us to spoil our country , to impose some pro-russian conditions, pro-russian rules on the territory that is covered with the blood of our heroes, these are not just unacceptable things, if someone has any desire to flirt with russia wants to continue some negotiations , let's say courtship or something else. believe me, i'm aware of what they will all end up with, and it's not my opinion, it's the opinion of the whole society, but they recently ended. er, this is a study, and we, based on these decisions, i

can say clearly understand that our society is already absolutely healthy, it is absolutely strong, and it will not allow anyone to slander themselves and slander. let's say the freedom for which today we pay a very, very high price for what we talked about, the supreme court finally today banned the party's activities, the opposition platform for life, they refused to satisfy the appeal, we hope that this is the final straw for them, mr. danilov, more returning to such operatives and to that. and what should we expect from the russian federation now , because of course, when we see this video of how they are recruiting prisoners to their army and urging them to go and fight for ukraine, this also causes absolute understanding. how far they have everything with processes it's just terrible. yes, but still, these

missile strikes that we are currently observing in kryvyi rih, er, it is clear that they are hitting one point there in order to make trouble for us, so to speak, what else can we expect from them now, that is, in what way they will regroup hmm put pressure on us further as we see it, what should people be ready for i would like to return to the court decision regarding psg, but in a healthy society such parties had no right to exist at all in the head, no matter who was imposed on so that these people would gather under some kind of party roof or party umbrella, they would advance to the parliament . in other bodies of the oblast councils of other councils. i want to remind you that when it comes to the so-called collaborators of traitors it is the workers of all sides of the party, who are they today, what did

they shout about the actions of the russian federation, do you remember when putin came to power, they blew up their own population, today we have a clear idea that in order to society in what way to incite even more against our country in the near future, here is a common call and can resort to tourist acts on the territory of their country, they have now returned to the agenda for the third day that we are following the issue dugina, they will now try to stabilize their societies. the fact is that with the research we have, we clearly see that the influence of putin has flowed to the present day of the russian leadership on the territory of the russian federation, it is falling, falling and falling. as for the attack on our critical infrastructure objects

on our country, we can expect anything from them, they will stop at nothing, because their task is quite simple, we all know it, it is the destruction of us as a nation, the destruction of us as countries, but if we didn't exist, this is their task. we are aware of this issue, and therefore we must be ready for all without any questions. the only thing i want to say is that i , er, would like to congratulate the rich, which the rest of the rest, as of today, there accepted 26 votes, two against the decision that the russian federation should liberate the zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant. so, in the end , international institutions begin to call things by their names. the fact that they attack objects that have nothing to do with the military is once again confirmation that for them the rules of civilized there are no rules, you said and the last question is probably the final question of our conversations and it is quite

difficult. they saw what the russians are ready for themselves, they are ready to fire at civilian infrastructure, they are even ready to take pleasure in their propaganda , saying that there is a part of ukraine without electricity and, er, we well, we all understand that president putin has disarmament at his fingertips, which can theoretically change the agenda in the whole world. how do you think the use of tactical nuclear weapons is likely? how is ukraine preparing for this? in general, it is possible to prepare from the other side, and what safeguards do putin have left in order not to use nuclear weapons, because on the battlefield he cannot compete with the armed forces of ukraine. this is a difficult question and the answer to it . tactical use of nuclear weapons is

impossible . tomorrow, the day after tomorrow, i once again want us not to stir up our societies, this is a very, very dangerous thing, this is what the russians have been betting on for quite a long time, and they continue to ask this question so that we have a patient here, the house file, so that we have here sown let's put it this way, processes that are not amenable to regulation, but considering the fact that a person is a person, in such situations, he can behave in himself, er, not according to the norms and rules by which he lives, i can say chaos and panic - this is a very dangerous thing for any processes for any things, i would advise our mass media to provide the pictures that you are currently providing, this is a very dangerous thing of influence, let's say so, on the psyche of people who are watching our television today, watching

you, i treat you with great respect. look what they did, we have one simple thing. victory will be ours because the light never seemed to be dark. these are simply exceptional things. you are right, mr. danilov, we took these shots and it is true because we are working live and we are all... and and these events that are taking place are completely new to us, as they are to the ukrainian army, as well as to us journalists, that is why we have to respond to everything promptly in order to bring benefit and in no way harm. we thank you for your interview so that we can talk with our guests in the studio, they found time for our audience, including oleksiy danilov, the secretary of the national security and defense council of ukraine, was with us via skype .

advanced 110 km with battles, liberated almost 400 settlements, almost the entire kharkiv region is occupied. this was reported by president volodymyr zelenskyi, let's briefly listen to his comments in the years and to our audience, it is obvious that during this time and during this time of the counteroffensive that is taking place, what are your thoughts do you have everything about it, what is happening or is it still happening, do you understand it, this is us, we also say that there was an uplift and last thursdays there was a lot of talk about it, but it is such an uplift when even talking about it a lot is not i wanted to. i wanted to keep quiet like that because it was scary that something would go wrong, as you think about it now, what else is russia capable of? it shows enough that russia is capable of everything. therefore, even from a nuclear strike, i think the only thing is that they are not capable of surrendering . so far, putin does not have such thoughts

well, i would not even say about cautious optimism, i would even say that one should really be afraid to turn, but from the other side of the internal, you understand when the world and the ukrainians, by the way, especially the ukrainians in the rear , because those who are at the front, they well they directly they see what they are capable of, what they can surrender the enemy to, when you are sitting in the rear, you don't understand it, and these victories, they give this and that, that effort that well, it is, in principle, possible and this is a useful story on the other hand, war is war and we absolutely understand that we have talented talented generals, i just read the candles yesterday, there was such a general who wrote a book on strategy in the 27th year, everything impressed me, this is good news, we were impressed because

the russian general staff is just a textbook on how to fight, when i read this textbook on how to fight and i saw that where it is necessary to do such modernity, the russian military machine does differently where it is necessary to do so, i did so, i applauded in dolonsky, what a good fellow they are, after all, they are, you understand, when we discussed there death, well, people in the world discussed the death of gorbacheva and said that he i made mistakes, i said. well, he didn't have a textbook on how to do perestroika. he didn't know, well, there is no such lunch, but here is one. i found out that in 1927 they wrote a textbook on how to fight, but everywhere it is written plus, they do minus, and everything is written minus they they do plus, i ask myself, i said, well, with such training, you can fight with them for a very long time and win, but despite the fact that i see that they are doing the

exact opposite, it is necessary because i am still afraid and afraid to even say the words that i think i am wrong when i am afraid because that we continue to think that they are strong, they can, they are like that, they are so, they are strong, insidious, and so on and so on, but maybe it is worth cultivating some other emotions, emotions, strength, confidence, understanding, ah, well , i apologize to such and such jewish-american stories because the americans are strong, they say everywhere no, we will not joke here, the jews say that the state of israel will hold on, no matter how many enemies are around, and it seems to me that it is very important to somehow educate ukrainians that this is secondary to it remained yesterday

, but it is also important not to foresee, because war is such a fragile thing that every day can change something, and so on. i will tell you good news. i studied the enemy's life and strength for three days, and before its studied i was afraid of general mobilization, and now i pray that russia finally announces general mobilization because it will ultimately undermine not only russia's military capabilities, but also its industrial, economic , and transport capabilities. and not a single non-redundant, or we can say redundant projectile, will simply not reach the russian front because there will be no one to prove it. yes, there are very,

very big problems. they do not have mobilization military training. yes, they are in the ninth year it was closed, and that's why they are now very simplified. well, you have to have, for example, 5 thousand people arrived and they have to be put on the railway first. went to the toilet. well, simple things, we need water, we need it, we need some sandwiches, and that’s it, that’s a whole chain , they can’t, they can’t, and this is what they tell me, it’s only me. well, i got it all out, and the experts from russia, the more sober military experts say

guys, in the ninth year, this mobilization story was finished, it was simply not possible, that's it, the personnel division was deployed, look, there were a lot of such names, and now it just won't work, and i think oh and the same ones . somehow, i am so happy that they are taking the army for me, well, let's do it more , more, a russian expert says, well, i would n't turn my back. if i were an officer, there were prisoners with weapons behind my back. well, as i told them, it's a dream to run away. a bullet in the back if i officer and they say the spirit is khokhly it is not we it is they that is, there is such a number of such dangers inside russia that i am