for a dictator, whose time is simply numbered, dmytro, do you think that evaluations, well, let’s call them situational , non-restorative, but these alliances are obvious, at least there are meetings, you know, patting each other on the shoulders, shaking hands, like with the leader of india, recently in samarkand and others like that they demonstrate what in your opinion. well, you know, in my opinion. what is he doing now? he is patting the chinese not on the shoulders, but on putin's cheeks, because well, let's remember that the far eastern event of the russian federation that they announced as nothing more the economic event of the year, where china and other countries should have been invited at the highest level, the chinese did not send their leader there, but a certain official came there. well, an absolutely first-rate official and it was like that. clearly showed that he does not want to go to russia and does not want to world

leaders and those countries in which he is interested because these are the markets where china sells its products , he did not want to show them that he is ready to support putin in this way we call the highway where there really was a meeting with putin, it was not a large-scale meeting with such a serious high level. it was a meeting on the sidelines of this event, which shows that it is less important from the point of view of international relations and all these things this is emphasized by all the others and he very clearly declared that china will not agree to any concessions to the sovereignty of kazakhstan. and this was a direct insult to putin and the russian federation, because the russian federation has recently been very aggressive rhetoric regarding kazakhstan regarding its sovereignty and the possibility of even an aggressive attack on ukraine, because they advised kazakhstan to look at what is happening in ukraine, so you

know, on the one hand, russia is trying to show that china is a partner, but china has huge economic problems, china is using uh and oil , petroleum products and gas to the russian federation at a very minimal price and based on its own economic and national flaws and uh, well, let's see what kind of military weapons china does not provide even this information has not been confirmed by the russian federation, because there are already some e-photos and videos circulating on telegram channels, allegedly with chinese characters for some mines , that they are already there somewhere at the disposal of russian militants, there is such information, but it is again not confirmed either. things like drones from iran, that is, it has not been officially confirmed yet, and we will speed up the pace of communication a little, the only thing i will remind here is just your words, ah, regarding this. so, their forum, well, let’s call it that, yes and in samarkand, the united states also called on china, which means not to get closer to the

russian federation, because it will lead to certain consequences, sanctions, etc. well, actually hinting at what you want to be friends with, who do you want, with uzbekistan, with the czech republic, etc. but just not with the russian federation, because it will hurt. i just have a few more questions for you in continuation on the topic, which i would describe as the country of the exile ah and the security guaranteed by the kremlin is a fiction, let's talk about it now. so it seems that everything that concerns the russian federation and its participation, let's say, everything related to russia and the direct leadership is collapsing before our eyes, and there are no prospects. russia is dissatisfied with everything, the megate resolution on the soviet union, do you remember it there, it is considered anti-russian, such statements were made the other day by the russians. they perceive it because the hated european russians excluded betrayals of europe, i will remind you, and also excluded their discounts of worldwide

international organizations and creative and sports and other political economic betrayals of the un on human rights also earlier from the big eight because now she simka, the nato bloc is hostile and fighting in ukraine precisely with the unfortunate russians who invaded the territory of ukraine. putin accuses the european commission of economic selfishness. i literally made a statement the day before yesterday. for retirement, all normal people, diplomats ignore , in short, there are only enemies around, well, this is from the point of view of the russians, but it turns out that they are inexpensive, and among recent friends, what do you think of this at all positioning, after all, that russia itself is primarily for internal consumption. what are they trying to achieve with these actions, statements and such active foreign policy activities? well, yes, i think that the topic is

laurel. in order for them to go to the un general assembly and in this way, well , some kind of rosophobia in relation to russia is manifested, so listen to all the stories, there are already a lot of them, you know how to add snowballs and of course, the russian rhetoric is absolutely obvious for internal use, that is, they want to show their citizens that the whole world is against russia, and that is why their rhetoric is very simple, they came to ukraine and are doing their special military operation in order to preserve russia, because the whole world is against them , that is, this is an absolutely wild position that is incomprehensible to anyone, starting with the ukrainians, but for some reason they still continue to sell it to the russians. unfortunately, in 20 years, the russians have stopped thinking critically and accepts this chaff at face value. well, i think that when they will understand what actually happened to

their country of special operations, all this rhetoric and this madness that the russian federation is creating both in ukraine and in the world. i think that the russians will eventually recover and understand how right it is closer to choosing such a government and that they were generally apolitical because a lot of russians say that they are not interested in politics there, they live their own lives and as a result, this life is taken away from them by the same politicians who like it i hope that there will be fewer russians in the european union, in europe, in particular in germany like spain, where they paint architectural monuments with these letters, or in germany, where, by the way, they are holding an oktoberfest this year, and there will be no russians either. at least there will be units, there is such a report that the oktoberfest opened in munich after a two-year break due to the coronavirus pandemic, well, even though the germans will be fine, i will sum up simply in this part, but this whole story has been touched, you know, run away from of the russian federation, even their partners, about the cossacks in the kazakhs, you mentioned in social networks and

telegram channels the day before, a report of alleged information from the ministry of foreign affairs of kazakhstan regarding the exit from the dkb in 2023, however, later the mfa issued a refutation of this information that the dkb is responsible for the organization of collective security and answers to all their e-e means there is a desire to understand the protection of those other security, but smoke without fire. as they say, it does not happen. how did you perceive this information? by the way, they run not only from the russians, the russians are running away from their partners, let's remember the same otgb and when this escalation takes place and it continues, the escalation between armenia and azerbaijan continues to take place. armenia appealed to russia to send the csto troops and help armenia cope with this military situation. and the russians said that you decide on your own , the politician diplomatically understands that's why the russians are already showing that they run away from their partners

well, if they behave like that, then accordingly the partners will also behave extra kazakhs who heard there aggressive and statements in their direction from the russians. of course, they made an absolutely correct statement that they would. by the way, the kazakhs were also supported by the statements of china, which said that it would not allow any situations with the sovereignty of kazakhstan, and the kazakhs said that in the 23rd year they really will raise slander and the statement you just quoted that you are about to refute this previous statement. i think it is so as not to offend the diplomatic agencies of the russian federation. well, and in order to propagandists of russia could somehow tell the people of the russian federation some other story , but i am absolutely convinced that kazakhstan's intentions are absolutely clear, they will come out in this organization. i think that the 23rd year is an absolutely obvious reference point for the kazakhs, so thank you for the opportunity to communicate it's been going on for a long time,

we talked with you today and talked about many topics. dmytro vasilov, a political consultant, was just with us in this part of the broadcast. thank you. the next topic of our broadcast is the militarization of ukraine and a course on nato, the large-scale creation of russia in ukraine, in russia, in ukraine, in fact, our territory forced us to spend 50% of the budget on the needs of the army now . -minister iryna shmygal said that from the 23rd year exactly such a number will be, but such living conditions and such realities will continue to be like this for a long time, because a wild and, if you will, an aggressive neighbor will not go anywhere geographically, unfortunately, but the latest sociological surveys of the russian government center indicate that that that the brains of russians are ultimately extremely damaged, not only in the older generation, but also in the youth, among those who consider themselves patriots, 60% of young russians

respond favorably to the actions of putin's policy and the actions of the army in ukraine, so the strengthening of defense capabilities, spending on air defense and the ministry of defense have become the training of our military the border in poland, great britain, germany, and the relevance to the military affairs of all of them, without exception, are everyday matters. by the way, the concept of the system of international security guarantees for ukraine was presented in kyiv the other day. part of the office of the president published the final documents prepared by an international group under the leadership of the president of ukraine andriy yermak and former nato secretary general anders fogh rasmusna, we see that one of the best guarantees of ensuring that ukraine has a significant military force capable of resisting any attack is the kyiv security treaty will significantly differ from the budapest memorandum of 1994, it is not about the obligation to refrain from any actions, but on the contrary to provide everything that

ukraine needs to maintain its protection, we expect that the kyiv security treaty will unite the main group of allied countries and ukraine, this group of grant states may consist of the united states of great britain, canada, poland, italy, germany, france, australia, turkey, as well as the countries of northern europe and the baltic states, central and of eastern europe, and i will remind you that the guarantees, in particular , provide for a number of certain security issues there. but it is very important that we should receive help, in particular, financially, as well weapons for quite a long time. well, it also talks about e-e resources for our armed forces and its support of the armed forces of ukraine about their development, as well as security guarantees, which should determine a number of obligations to take groups of guarantees together with ukraine, well groups of guarantees are available on attention of certain specific countries there from the united states and the united kingdom of the countries of the

european union serhii djerzh candidate of political sciences chairman of the public league of ukraine nato senior lieutenant of the armed forces of ukraine joins i congratulate you. i congratulate you. can we talk? well, you probably heard about what we just announced about this security document, the declarations, if you want, of the intentions, at least which were supported by our partners. but can we talk about the fact that this presented document is such a step or even several steps towards integration into nato. are these parallel processes? well, to some extent, this is a step towards integration into nato. in any case, it is about the security of our state and the fact that there is attention to this. and we ourselves form uh, this agenda affects the text of this document is already very good, especially since most of the countries that have announced they are nato members and obviously these processes are parallel , we should not, they should not be

an alternative to each other, because there is a question in the end of nato - this is a developed structure that has its own mechanisms, how effective will this contract be, if it will work, we don't know yet, we believe in it, we want it to be so, but here mr. serhii just clarified immediately how effective it is, if with financial or there security, well, in relation to the armament of the training of our military is more or less clear, that is, they will probably support us for a long time, but regarding the guarantee, we remember this unsuccessful budapest format, which everyone criticizes, which turned out to be completely ineffective, and in this case, if we are not members of the north atlantic alliance , what guarantees can we even talk about, the russians have already reacted there, putin was asked a question, and after some kind of meeting in samarkand, he had a press conference and was asked what his the reaction to this, the security of the document, he said i don't know, they invented something there, i didn't read it, let them

invent it, that is, well, you know, somehow, and what type, whatever they guarantee, it's not that nato is not, it's not the fifth article and so on. well, he can criticize anything, you know, if ukraine became a member of nato, maybe he would also say the same thing. well, now, we are not threatened by anything, because ukraine , as a future member of nato, is threatened, but finland and sweden, which became members of russia, are not threatens to say so, well, these statements can be made as much as you can accept disbelief, but on the other hand, of course, we need such agreements , bilateral e formats, and in this case, this agreement implies that ukraine will conclude bilateral formats with those countries that can guarantee us this assistance and provide

them of course, all this is also formed in the event that after our victory there will be a period of peace and there will be a threat to you. that is, these are not preventive actions . to a certain extent, it usually works by itself, the structure of nato, the interaction of the member countries works a lot to ensure that a new war does not arise, and for the entire history of nato since 1949, we see that no one has tried to check the strength of how nato works. mechanisms of interaction, we have worked out plans and how it will be implemented, everything is clearly written and known, so there is such a positive thing in

this contract, but there is a small caveat so that we do not perceive it as the alternative is that we will write something down on paper in some document and you will be the guarantee, we will show ourselves before the new year, the autumn of the 21st year was very fruitful, and in principle the first months of the 22nd winter, when we remember , our leadership met ah, with the representatives of other european countries, various new formats were concluded, new alliances with the baltic countries, with poland, with great britain, we discussed this and these are parallel processes, which are in principle superfluous. we will never be final. by the way, returning to this issue means the security document of the final document in the future. it should be called the kyiv open compact, which has been roughly translated as the kyiv agreement on security . and whether the new agreement will be effective, time will tell . that this security agreement is a prologue

, well, a direct speech, yes, a prologue to the third world war, it’s enough that they reacted so critically, but a world war, to which it probably foresees the task of a nuclear strike, yes, tactically, the weapons are in a certain territories yes, er, in the united states, er, president zhurbyden gave an interview to himself from a tv channel, and yunio was asked what would happen if a nuclear strike was carried out on the territory of ukraine, he said no need, no need, no need, and what would the consequences be, he said eh roughly, the consequences will be more unheard of there, but i still can’t say exactly what they will be, whether it is possible to say in this part that any agreements today with countries that are not members of nato, they can, in principle, count on the security guarantees of third countries well, probably in in principle, the discussion itself is positive in this regard, and we see that russia itself is excluded from this discussion, because it does not comply with any agreements at all, there is no longer china there, we know that china is also the

guarantor of the security of ukraine according to the budapest memorandum, because i signed it great britain, the united states russia-ukraine, but then france and china joined the poems. that's why it's actually these countries that are helping today, the only thing you know, i noticed that there are no countries in the list that at one time blocked our action plan regarding nato membership, er, they have been since 2008, if they were talking about ukraine becoming a member of nato but much later and under the influence of russia, it was such gray diplomacy, black diplomacy

, and i would say russian pressure on these countries with the assurance that there will be business gas everything will be fine, just don't accept ukraine into nato and some european leaders were on that if they all are signing this kyiv security treaty, then what is the problem of accepting ukraine into the nation at all? that this is a big question, isn't it, or shouldn't it be worth starting with this? let's leave all these parallel processes behind. we invite you and what we ask for and that's it. we put an end to the aggression of our northern neighbor. thank you serhii zhershe. i am a candidate for political news. america's statement by biden, let's also remember the role of the congress, in particular, and the parliamentarians there,

because on the second attempt, russia can still become a state recognized as a state sponsor of terrorism . the us senate registered a bill recognizing russia as a state sponsor of terrorism. two american senators, democrats, richard blumentary, a republican, submitted for consideration this nato of the us congress in accordance with the party bill regarding the prospects and possible support of the initiative , we will ask our colleague from washington, dmytro anopchenko, welcome, welcome councils to join you dmytro , nothing is known yet about the likely date of the vote in the congress. maybe you can tell us something specific, but the legislative initiative has once again acquired an update due to the mass murder of ukrainians by the russians, and in particular, in the liberated territories of kharkiv region, the creation of a prerequisite for the recognition of the genocide of ukrainians, the destruction of civil infrastructure, and as it was in kryvyi for example, the creation of risks around the zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant, etc. well, before, such a proposal was not successful, i will remind you among the political elite the usa stated in the state department that this idea would deprive

the usa of its negotiating position, because in washington they do not hold discussions with terrorists, what can change from your point of view now, well, without a break, it is indisputable that what has now been found is what has now been invented by this friend bucha and how much i understand that it is much more terrible, it will have a very serious emotional impact on congressmen and american politicians, that is, there will be an impact . the position of the administration is now very clearly voiced by the state department, you know this honestly, even if they don't say that we will consider it and they put the brakes on there literally a few days ago, he will not go to the next one when he was asked a direct question. why is the administration not doing this? he says that there are two points , the first point that the state department is afraid that this status may disrupt the grain agreement with istanbul on the export of ukrainian grain

, and this is serious for the united states, on the other hand. he says that there are many appeals from international organizations that want to provide humanitarian aid and they are afraid that they will not be able to do it if russia has this status, we can talk in detail about those fears, however, this is what the department has voiced. well, we understand that at the administration level there is still no decision for them to agree to this on the other hand since the congress, which says that with all due respect to the position of the administration, they are ready to promote this bill, they are ready to pass it, that is, in the near future, the closer to the elections, the more active the congress will be on this topic in the near future, the number one topic, by the way, regarding the grain agreement, the russians are already there at the level of the highest political leadership declaring that they are already dissatisfied with this grain agreement, the fact that they supposedly know that they gave the green light for the export of ukrainian grain precisely because of that, not because they can to recognize the state of sponsorism there, and because of the fact that ukrainian grain is allegedly supplied

not to countries, but to a decrepit economy, which well, to whom was the grain intended, and to the european union ? opportunities to trade in grain, well, this is a separate topic, let's not touch it, let's talk about what happened, let's remember that there was a meeting at the level of the leaders of the countries in samarkand, and after putin's meeting with russia , is the leader of china, da junglebi expressed the clear position of the white house that china should not get close to a country that leaves death and destruction everywhere. do you think that the chinese leadership listens to such advice, because we know that the chinese , in principle, have always been pragmatic and obviously, the relations between the usa and the eu are many times more profitable than you know, and with stagnant russia, you know, this is the same reason why china is not so in half a year, what is called special operations in russia, what is a war , did not help russia at all. i do not know how

publicly known this is, but from the same john kirby from representatives of the state department, including not on camera, i keep hearing that for six months, and this was monitored by the american special services and the american ministry of finance, china did not help in any way to launder russian money, china did not help in supplies, china did not help in circumventing the american sanctions, well, this shows only one thing, on the one hand, they will increase this, you know, such belligerent rhetoric that they will get closer to moscow, that they are arguing against the west. well, on the other hand, they are really afraid of american sanctions and secondary sanctions there is an opportunity to lose the american market and the european market, that's why you know such a double position and what we hear publicly. i think we don't know half of what he really wants and what he's afraid of chinese well, by the way, with regard to sanctions, the state deposit clearly stated earlier that china will pay a very serious price if it helps to destroy what you just mentioned, it will help in circumventing the sanctions there in

some other things, especially this applies to weapons, so i would just like to remind you that during the time of trump, i already mentioned this there were economic wars, then many restrictions were introduced, logistics chains from china were blocked, trade and economic activity was limited not only between countries, but there in principle opinion anyway, what is the price now? maybe, well, in the event that biden is presented, everyone, look, there is a story that the united states, and this is such a principled position of the american administration, categorically does not comment on the sanctions that can be adopted before they are adopted, this is done for several reasons that they don't want to make empty threats from the other side, they don't want to warn about anything so that countries or entities or someone else doesn't prepare and doesn't change these sanctions, that is, by and large, there is a very clear message that china will face the consequences if he really goes to the extent of easing sanctions or military cooperation with russia, that is, it is clear to china. well, if,

for example, a military operation by china against the taiwanese happened does he quit helping to launder russian money to avoid sanctions and that sectional package that has already been implemented step by step e-e page by page that was implemented against russia it was also implemented against china they are wonderful understand and they, in principle, i think they even want to develop such immunity against sanctions now , looking at what is happening with russia, what price is it paying, but in the big picture, and i understand , this signal was not public. this question is a recent interview of the cbs tv channel, biden, where he mentioned, i will remind you before the current, let me remind you that when there were threats against the task, for example, there is a chemical attack or even a nuclear attack by the russians on territories ukraine at that time was still headed by boris johnson,

who was the prime minister of great britain. he declared that great britain would strike back immediately. it was such a clear statement to the question of what the united states would do in the event of what, god forbid. something like this will happen, joe biden answered that well, we will see what the consequences will be or what kind of blow it will be and then we will think about it, but there will be a harsh reaction. do you think this is a bit of a quagmire, uh, what a position, a cautious position towards the russian federation earlier, biden could call poo a murderer, for example, and the statements were more harsh, or maybe i'm wrong . and i'll tell you. this is a public position, because it 's absolutely reliable to me. it's known. not on camera, i was told this in a big house, er, by a person who deals with these issues, what er- in case of any reaction from russia, there are already concrete plans , we once feared a chemical attack in this case, the national security council and the pentagon

agreed on an action plan in case of any actions of russia, in case the situation worsens i absolutely specific prescribed plans, i.e. the biden administration will not meet, do not coordinate and think and come up with it. this is it, however, it is not disclosed for obvious reasons, again, so that moscow could not prepare, that is why i will tell you that it is possible that biden is soft and sounds but by and large, he has what is called on the table, that is, very serious decisions are on the table on the agenda, well, you see, what could be better is somehow such soothing rhetoric at this late hour . well, at least we have late ones, you don't the opportunity to chat was as always interesting and informative. dmytro onopchenko, a journalist, washington was just with us in this part of our conditionally , i have to finish it already, but of course our broadcast continues, it will last almost all night, so don’t leave it and be as informed as possible . good mood to everyone, act in advance our

task is to disrupt the plans of the enemy, our slogan is the wise will rule by example, our battlefield is to pass the deep rear of the enemy, our goal is victory. glory to the military intelligence of ukraine. a sports hall in which ukrainian athletes could train, but since russia started a full-scale war in ukraine, there is silence here , russian and belarusian athletes are silent, they pretend as if nothing happened and with their silence support the murder, destruction and this cruel war we must remain silent

, join the struggle, share your videos and publications calling for a boycott of russian and belarusian athletes, post them on social networks , support ukraine with the company's hashtags on on the sports front, silence kills with the support of the ministry of youth and sports of ukraine wherever you are , you can be with those who need it buy medicine for lyudmila petrivna help svetlana who ran away with one bag find them on the portal and nearby they are waiting for your help a-a ukraine