i’m sure, but to me, including as a member, as a prisoner, they told in the canon that they came to them here and here, and that means they were invited there for some rather large money . videos with er man of monsters not similar to the prepositional phrase, it became clear that it is necessary to react to it react er and in the legal sense, because er, well, what is actually written about in our application is not all absolutely illegal, it does not have any relations with the russian legislation and the procedures provided for there, including the procedures for replacing the usual term of punishment with some kind of milder punishment, for example , the court must change the punishment, replace the unusual part with a milder punishment and again, for which he was appointed,

but not naturally, it cannot be connected with any business trip to any ukraine, eh, and obtaining military weapons and carrying out some military tasks, and that can be done by the president of the russian federation the federation applied a-a pardon but no pardon if you look at the presidential website of the kremlin, uh, there were five pardoned in the xxi year in the year 22, in my opinion, not even one, and mercenary, just in case, according to russian legislation, is a serious crime ah and what does a monster man does not look like a hallway, it’s actually something different, like uh, incitement, uh, recruiting , so to speak, in russian, of people.

another topic related to russia today entered into force: entry into latvia, lithuania, estonia, and poland for citizens of russia with schengen tourist visas has come into force, about the intention not to allow russians with schengen visas to pass through their border, these countries announced that at the beginning of september they will make exceptions for those who enters for family and humanitarian reasons journalists of the reuters agency on the border with estonia talked about the innovation with citizens of russia. here's what they think about it . who still have access through other countries, uh, i don't see this as a big problem, but it's a real one. of course, i've been traveling to estonia since the ninth and eighth years. here, i have friends here. uh, i spend a lot of time here. well , wait until it comes, the majority of russians noticed that if they were not allowed to turkey, even the minority and the

majority of emigrants, but this is a very insignificant part of the population, in fact, a very excruciating desire concerns ordinary ordinary people how are those that have nothing to do with it and it's just a pity that such sanctions apply to ordinary people, well, the only eu country bordering russia that has not introduced a ban on crossing its border for holders of schengen tourist visas is finland, in fact, as i said, it's the only one eu land crossing point for russian citizens this is how the prime minister of neighboring estonia commented on the decision of the finnish government of course there is a loophole - this is finland this is true it is not entirely effective if finland does not take participation is true, but it's still better than nothing and for our security. i think if we can

stop the flow of people at our borders, then it will be a better situation than if we can't do it. two thirds of russian tourists come to europe via finland and estonia, obviously when we put everything on ourselves, it creates pressure for trips to finland, and i really, really hope that they will join the city councils, the ban on russian citizens visiting the eu for tourist purposes, the influence on the kremlin regime, we will definitely talk now but i have one more event, or rather a statement that we cannot help but mention. it is about what pugacheva wrote on instagram. over the weekend, the singer turned to the russian ministry of justice and asked to be included in the avalanche agents. this happened after the russian authorities declared her an agent on friday . maksym galkina pugacheva stated that she is in solidarity with her husband, that she wishes her homeland prosperity, peace of freedom of speech and an end to the death of my guys, i quote our guys for an illusory purpose. and

although pugacheva's statement in support of galkin is not contained the words ukraine or war, most commentators perceived the singer's post as a criticism of putin's russian invasion of ukraine. despite this, they refused to prepare pugacheva's statement. putin's spokesman dmytro piskov, when asked whether the kremlin considers pugacheva's authoritative opinion, replied that he does not think that such questions are relevant at all kremlin well, as i already said, pugacheva's post gathered hundreds of thousands of reactions not only in russia, but also in ukraine. some say that pugacheva's uprising will lead to the fall of the regime putin, others are more reserved, they say that pugacheva simply supported her husband, no more and no less . artemiy troitsky, a journalist and music critic, joins the air. hello, what do you think about pugacheva's statement? a bold gesture, or she simply supported her husband, of course, no more, no less than her husband, this

is the same thing. but in this sense, great job, as far as i know, she was not going to make any loud anti-putin military statements, but idiots and from the russian, er, elites of the administration of the special services, they actually provoked her to this, that is, er, that's what her husband what's more, her favorite and we respect you have already been taken and recorded, that is, the same thing with the laurel, uh, foreign agents, here she was, she couldn't help but show solidarity with him, and she did it, and the melody is, i think that this is a very important event for

russia . if we say for ukraine and for the rest of the world the most important event is, for example, the counter-offensive of the ukrainian army and the fact that you won back, say , a significant part of the kharkiv region, they are advancing on kherson, and so on. here in russia, i think not everyone knows about it and they are not particularly worried about it. but hello pugacheva, this is a serious event that i think a lot of people will be made to think about what, uh, people from the number of those uh, i had never reflected on the war before, or even thought that uh, the goals of this war are not illusory and few, as it is written, m. pugacheva in general, this is for us

a very serious blow to putin's regime and a blow of course well, it's not a military strike, but pugacheva, it's not a heimersk missile, it's a very secondary impact, that is, it's a psychological impact, it 's an emotional impact . well, it affects tens of millions of russian citizens. if this is so, then the kremlin can't not notice it and not react, the kremlin naturally noticed it very well, it will be noticed, so i think that the reaction of the official kremlin will be grave silence, then there is peskov who has already said that he will not comment on the text of pugachyov, and i think that it is in the kremlin. and in the nearest neighborhoods, there will be

such a complete veil. uh, there are such well-known lockers of prostitutes there, like all these jelly nightingales and semenyans, mikhalkovs, tolstoy, and so on, who will worship everything. but this is how you consider that they express their opinion. ofiovetstvenoe kremlin people i think very much regret what happened to maxim galkin and what provoked alla pugacheva to this statement, i have no doubt that someone is responsible for this, if it is definitely not putin himself. the administration of the president or will correct it if the ministry of justice

, i have no doubt that the head of the government can do it, of course, it is very, very, very strong, where the kremlin lives in the eyes of putin . and on the agent they will say that here is her husband and on the agent that he is somewhere from ukraine, she turns out to be in the same spirit as a coward, she is just a fool of you to invite her husband, but she is not an agent for our man, therefore, of course, she will be recognized as an innocent there won't be, that would be just completely stupid, they would end it, that would end us with ethism. i would like to return very briefly to these visa restrictions. today, the ban on entry into estonia, lithuania, latvia, poland by citizens of russia with schengen visas came into force.

they say that the kremlin is only happy about this and others are not. what if russian citizens are not allowed to travel to europe, then they will somehow react to veronika and simply start demanding something from their regions. in your opinion, what effect will this have? it's wrong, it's not, it's not others. i don't think it's going to be revenge . it's a serious effect. in my opinion, this whole story is inflated to a significant degree, because there are 140 million people in russia, with more than 140 million people. - eh schengen visas if people want to go from russia and we don’t have to go to the european union, i can’t go anywhere, for any taste, for any climate, for any whore, but from india, thailand was assigned to argentina by redbox if there are so many beautiful countries with which russia has

visa-free regime so, if you want, run to putin's first whimper. well, let's go, please, go to the west, where you want, i think that this whole story is significant for political purposes. countries of the european union and russian cities in the same estonia, there are tens, if not hundreds, of 1,000 residents , and many of them have tons passports, or at least trust me for housing that openly supports putin, and they organize some demonstration actions for that reason which is written by all sorts of fives in the networks and so on, that's it , that's it for history, in fact, the problem is

that you won't let in some tourists from some tourists, eh, it's actually a trifle. thank you very much for joining our broadcast, artem and the troitsk journalist and music critic was on radio svoboda. the war in ukraine may last until 2030, and ukraine itself may lose a third or half of its territory. this statement was made by hungarian prime minister viktor orban not in public at a closed meeting with his political supporters in hungary. this information is from the journalists of the hungarian service of radio svoboda received their sources . zoryana stepanenko, a correspondent of radio svoboda in brussels, will tell us more about this story. she is with us in contact with zoryan. is zoryan with us? i hope we will see her now. yes, zoryana

has appeared. my congratulations. well, please tell me , first of all, we are waiting for details from you on orban 's statements. viktor urban once again distinguished himself by his own position, which is in sharp contrast and generally accepted in the european union, he did not voice it in general, this was said at a secret meeting in the hungarian hinterland, so to speak, where he usually meets with his colleagues at the beginning of the new of the political season and the details of what was said from the words of the participants of the meeting, our colleagues from the hungarian service of radio svoboda managed to obtain this time. the focus of his attention was the war in ukraine . news , and this time he took up specific geopolitical forecasts, how long it will last, he said eight years,

and as a result, ukraine will spend from a third to a half of its territory, these words i will note that they sounded on september 10, that is, when the ukrainian counteroffensive operation in the kharkiv region was already in full swing, which we know was crowned with success for the ukrainian armed forces. well, why did its results not affect orbán 's beliefs? scandalous statements, answer, listen, you will understand. i have information from diplomatic sources that mr. urban is still firmly convinced that even if russia does not win the war, somehow a solution will be found, maybe it will be a new frozen conflict, both in transnistria and in georgia , and he believes that for many years vladimir putin will remain in power and the european union will in a certain way get tired of sanctions and will start to restore business with russia in six months or a year, and orban

thinks that this is what the development of the situation, he will receive certain benefits from putin. and as of yesterday, urban believes that this war could have been a local conflict, but it became a global one, because they say the west intervened, and urban once again complained that by punishing russia with sanctions the european union is shooting itself in the foot by mentioning the energy crisis, so the hungarian prime minister is against extending the restrictions, complaining that he is the only leader in the eu who takes such a position, but they hope that soon this will change and he will find like-minded people, in particular in the italian authorities, where this is happening elections and these are all components of his closed speech, and these statements are heard against the background of a clear worsening of relations between brussels and budapest, well, in particular. last week, the european parliament recognized by a majority of votes that hungary is no longer a democracy but an autocracy with a hybrid electoral regime, and the

european commission the day before recommended freezing its issuance of one and a half billion euros from the eu budget due to comments on the fact that there is corruption in hungary, the rule of law, there are also comments in the european commission. funds were provided by the horba government for several months to correct the situation accordingly, and the hungarian government declares that they are ready to do so . well, the hungarian prime minister says our colleagues from of the hungarian service of radio svoboda is quite optimistic about this and believes that everything will be resolved and that money from the european union will come. well , it is unlikely that experts in international politics say that the internal misunderstanding will be a sufficient reason for urvan to change his external line. i am afraid that urban will continue to cause harm in international politics just as much as he believes that putin can win,

i think these calculations will change. when ukraine starts winning on the battlefield, this is the most effective argument what will force viktor orbán to shut up and change his position, orbán's statement that echoed behind closed doors was commented on in the office of the ukrainian president, hungary was called a trojan horse that, at the expense of european taxpayers, seeks the collapse of the european union in hungary. and the advisor to the head of the president's office, mykhailo podalyak, added that urban dreams of a european peace, this is a quote in europe, and asked a rhetorical question whether it is worth financing these diversions. property that the official reaction to this speech from the officials of the european union to what was said a-a we have not seen , but due to the anti-western international policy of the hungarian leader, hungary will not be deprived of eu funds,

i will also note that this is a parallel process launched due to claims to the rule of law in hungary and its own end it has not yet arrived and intrigue remains, and currents will arrive please, thank you , zoryana stepanenko was live from brussels on radio svoboda well, at this very moment, the funeral of queen elizabeth ii of great britain is ending in windsor the ceremony began this morning in london and with a memorial service in westminster abbey , to which more than a thousand people were invited, among them the prime minister of ukraine denys shmyhal and the wife of the ukrainian president olena zelenska zelenska is also on the list of five hundred heads of state distinguished guests invited to the memorial service and reception organized by king charles the day before . by the way, elena zelenska met with kate middleton in london. the princess of wales held this audience at buckingham palace. it is noticeable that

official representatives of russia were not invited to the farewell ceremony for elizabeth ii, as well as representatives of belarus, venezuela, syria , afghanistan, and myanmar. in response, the russian foreign ministry complained about the profound immorality of the organizers of the queen's burial ceremony because of the fact that russian representatives were not invited. on september 14, i will remind you that thousands of britons and citizens of other countries paid tribute to elizabeth ii. they were shocked to stand in multi-kilometer queues in which they had to stand for more than 12 hours today. tens of thousands of britons gathered on the streets of london to watch the farewell ceremony of queen elizabeth ii. i will remind you that she died on september 8 at the age of 96 and is with us live bohdan tsyupin correspondent of the voice of america in london bohdana my greetings, good afternoon, as i said before the ceremony to the vip reception organized by king

charles, among the 500 guests, elena zelenska was also invited. britain as one of the many delegations that were invited to this funeral, this funeral is not just a-a burial of a person, a queen, mother , and the current king, this is a state funeral, the head of state in great britain died, that is, who to invite, who not to invite it was decided by the government, it was decided by the official organizations of the country, the fact that russia was not invited, belarus was not invited to exchange syria, er, syria, for example , er, there are no diplomatic relations in britain, but they

invited, for example, iran, er, invitations, for example delegation of china, although there were certain frictions here in connection with china, in particular, because after china introduced sanctions against members of the british parliament here, a group of british legislators protested against this invitation and, by the way, the chinese delegation to the building of the parliament to westminster a part of the palace , which was a part of the master's holt, where the queen's house was, the chinese situation was not allowed there, that is, when it comes to a state funeral, it is obvious that it is about state policy, issues of diplomacy, and so on.

there are no unpleasant aspects of diplomacy, many unpleasant problems in relations with countries are put aside, as i said, even china eventually invited a chinese delegation, even iran was invited, and so on, and so on, but it is obvious that there are boundaries, which countries some cross over, and to me we already had to talk about it today that in the case of russia it is not only about the attack on ukraine and russia's initiation of the largest war during the second world war in europe after the second world war, it is also about the fact that russia is russian representatives did here in great britain and i think that many of our viewers and listeners remember what happened in salisbury with the nerve-paralytic poison

of newbies and remember what happened a long time ago with oleksandr lytvynenko poisoned with a terrible radioactive poison here in london such things are not forgotten, they leave a mark. russia has not yet put an end to it, has not asked for forgiveness, has not even recognized as its responsibility everything that has been done by it over all these years, both in relation to ukraine and in relation to great britain, and in relation to other countries in the world, i am here. i want this is what i read that it was not without a scandal, in particular, the defenders of the strong indignant even demand to protest because the ruler of saudi arabia was invited to this funeral, and i will remind him, in fact, american president joe biden and american intelligence also called the murderer of the journalist pam you

are following jamal khashoggi in turkey and he was invited to the funeral. this is how i see the scandal about this, he was invited, but i know that there were uh parts of uh in this in this today's ceremony in others the events surrounding the funeral, to which prince salman did not come. he could not attend them due to the negative reaction that we see here regarding him. that is you, again, i returned to the fact that it is about a state funeral, a state event, that is, in fact, this is a diplomatic event, an opportunity, in particular, for countries to show the level of their relations, to show respect for the now deceased head of state, etc. and when it's about

how you say scandals there was a state funeral in great britain so far, were there any problems, were there any scandals, as you say, maybe quite small , and considering the fact that we had about a million people, spectators, hundreds of thousands, in fact , guests, hundreds of hungry countries what did you manage to do? i think that many people will probably be praised in the near future. i don't know. maybe something else will come out that we haven't heard about yet, but in principle, the way everything was organized in london during this week has caused many people, at least so far fascination, for example, there was a queue that stretched for kilometers in london, in which people stood for 12 or more hours, but despite everything

everything happened eh coordinated eh without any obvious big problems i saw this eh big queue eh that stretched out in london and some people are surprised how it is possible to organize it calmly and let's say yesterday even from the evening i saw people who pitched tents along the future route back here in london pitched with sleeping bags for the night that is it is obvious that there are different ones people with different emotions, but for now, we managed to keep this burst of emotions, so to speak, everything happened in the channel. so far, everything is settled. i think that many organizers of this event, this funeral in london, hope that this day is calmly

settled . and it will be worthy and it will end that this page of history and of britain will be closed. we have a little more than a minute left, the last question, i see that the death of queen elizabeth has again raised the question of the expediency of the existence of the monarchy in the modern world . well, at least this is discussed or talked about now in london no today no today the main topic is the farewell to the queen time for the debates about the monarchy will be he will continue to watch how it will work and what he will do now king charles the third in this discussion there were they will be but today they have somewhat faded into the background. i am sure that we, as journalists and people, will talk a lot more about how interesting the combination of this archaic, undemocratic , very strange system of constitutional monarchy works in britain.

it is used with this dynamic democracy where the rule of law reigns, where, like a fixed clock, elections work, and so on. and so on. and this is a combination of history, a combination of archaism with modernity. don't forget the side. this country has always been ready for changes before reforms. and we will see how it will happen in the future. i think it will be very interesting. well, this is the great merit of queen elizabeth ii. thank you very much. thank you. very much bohdan tsyupin, correspondent of the voice of america in london, was on radio freedom, he was at the very end, i traditionally encourage you to subscribe to the pages of

radio freedom on social networks and on youtube, and freedom life will return to the air tomorrow, think even everything for a long time, throw these thoughts out of your head name, senses, tempo it works in 25 seconds and takes care of the mucous membrane of the nose in case of death. nazivin sensetev does not need to wait to breathe . how long will the exhumation of the body in izyum last? our country will give free wheat to ethiopia and somalia and to the mariupol drama theater again premiere my greetings to everyone who is with us