the ministry of internal affairs does not have a complete register, that is, in order for this register to work, some data must be entered there, and the ministry of internal affairs actually does not have a list of who they issued weapons to in general in this country, because the procedures by which weapons are issued are quite different, they are quite chaotic, because there are reward weapons available by e- in connection with the occupation of a certain position, weapons are issued, there are weapons issued for a certain service, there are simply citizens, weapons are issued, and there is no order in this today, because in my opinion, this register is a little rushed, because for this it must be first of all, the law was adopted in order to have a clear system in general, to clearly understand what is allowed and what is prohibited in our country and, accordingly, so that it corresponds to the real picture that exists today, because today people have much more weapons, of course, than is allowed

according to the instructions of the ministry of internal affairs but its sign is the order of the registrar, it will not be able to work so quickly because it is impossible to enter information very quickly in this register, how then to bring order so that we understand where and who has which weapons because on the one hand we understand what is there is a certain amount of circulation of illegal weapons and here, well, there is a fact, but how to bring order to at least understand what we have with legal weapons of course, we need to create such a register, this is definitely and it is obvious because it is real it is immediately clear whether this person has the right to carry weapons what kind of weapons are these, there are no doubts about this, only i suspect that in fact this register will be created much longer, it will not start immediately in october, or for this it is simply necessary automatically, the ministry of internal affairs will not be able to enter all the data that they have today

it will be created and filled gradually a-a, but clearly we, the ministry of internal affairs, need to immediately sell another system in parallel, we need to liberalize today's legislation on the carrying of infinite weapons, of course, all weapons cannot be allowed, but obviously we need to expand the circle of people who have the right to weapons and, accordingly, increase the volume of legal weapons which can have a population because we simply because of and control mechanisms that will be strengthened, we risk with risk to the fact that a lot of e.g. soldiers or people who are in a trio or many other people. they, in principle, without doing anything so socially dangerous, will formally break the law and the police will have a claim against them, that is, they can be arrested for

possessing weapons, although in fact in civilized countries carrying or possession of such weapons is not socially dangerous and, in principle, they are not risky for, well, for the country in terms of public order, what kind of minister he said that what is important here is this public threat from a person from the fact that she has this weapon, and our legislation is actually very strict, it is such that, in principle , a person will not be able to carry a weapon just like that, that is, one must be connected to the law enforcement agencies there, as well as to some certain certain positions or specialists . this is not quite the right approach, it is not european approach in europe, a much larger number of people should be another topic, let's just go, now we still wanted to focus on because i just , then, uh, we want to focus specifically on the registry, if i understood correctly. so you say that a little well, we are in a hurry, but if we don't do anything, because we still don't have a law, that is, won't it be even

worse, we may have to start gradually, it won't be significant - it's worse. of course, this will facilitate checks at checkpoints and so on, but in principle, it will only strengthen the control function of the ministry of internal affairs and to strengthen the control function now of the ministry of internal affairs - it simply does not correspond to what is happening among the people because, well, how can it be compared, well, it is even difficult to say if... in their hands, illegal weapons in their hands and uh, well, we will now strengthen the control over these weapons, the ministry of internal affairs will start to really put pressure on people. we will receive hundreds of criminal cases against these people, but if we look at the essence of these cases, then there is no criminality because it is ordinary people who live,

for example, in remote areas or are just going to defend the country. they have nothing wrong, they don't have to harm the camera holding this weapon, so it's just control mechanisms like me, they are ahead of what should be done first, it would be worthwhile to make a certain liberalization and then introduce a stricter control mechanism, your opinion volodymyr yavorskyi human rights defender - expert center for civil liberties , because it should be noted that i am told here that the deputy minister of internal affairs, ihor bondarenko, who joined us, disagrees with you , but he also has the right to one's position and i am grateful that we heard two sides and now we will look at this whole story from the point of view of the users of weapons which weapons are already in hand, which are official, which are the people do they use it legally or do they have it legally uh, let's add to the conversation from sagittarius, the instructor

of the krav-mage federation of ukraine, yury minkin. i hope that i said the name of the boyan federation correctly, and it is not directly related to practice. i will tell you honestly. tell me, please. we will focus now on the register and i immediately want to emphasize this, how is the process of registration of weapons registration going on from the practical point of view of you as a person who is involved in this and whether you think it will get better or worse or nothing will change when will this register appear, as of today, citizens of ukraine are allowed to purchase hunting weapons separately, categories are allowed to purchase special means. well, what is another name for injury to god's arrow, short-barreled firearms in civilian circulation are practically absent, how will this affect the register, i cannot answer to this question because the question is not to count something for today. the question is to first

adopt a law to legislatively regulate the weapons facility in ukraine, finally in 30 years, the state of this i didn't succeed and uh, how can i allow citizens to defend themselves by owning short-barreled firearms? that is, it's not a matter of the register, it's a matter of the law, well, again, you see, we're getting into this topic, we must definitely raise it, i'll say that public this has already been mentioned more than once, and we wanted to focus on the registry, but anyway, one way or another, we have to touch on this topic again. if we talk about registration, i read that now in order to register a weapon, you need to collect a bunch of documents a pile of papers and a pile of everything, and in particular, one of the positions of the ministry of internal affairs is that such a register will simplify registration for users. do you think it

will happen? it's not crazy, but i'll give you an example if i submitted documents for the purchase of one weapon, i have a permit and i want to purchase another weapon, and i can refer to a copy of the documents that i previously submitted, register b in this regard, it should really simplify the purchase of weapons , because instead of a permit for the purchase of a unit of weapons, the law specifically plans to introduce a permit for weapons a-and the issue of possession is already regulated by obtaining a separate piece of paper e-e on the way to the store, then the permit system, and the registration of weapons already directly during purchase, i.e. you have permission for a certain category of weapons, you will purchase a unit, the next unit of this weapon is faster, but the first purchase of a weapon is still the need to collect a certain amount documents, as well as during its registration, as

it is now, the number of weapons and people who have them in their hands and to really prevent illegal circulation well, first of all, it is necessary to give the opportunity to citizens who have illegal weapons, including to the topic of a short-barreled weapon that was purchased for self-defense, not with the purpose of using it criminally, but to provide an opportunity to legalize such a weapon, first of all, so that we can immediately separate citizens who seek to protect themselves and are forced to break the law to the state and it did not provide such an opportunity to criminals who seek to use these weapons as charging tools for committing a crime, this is the first thing that must be

done in the future. the position is correct, but you know i have the impression that the ministry of internal affairs is trying to put wax in front of the horse, well, we also heard your opinion, i am grateful to you for it so, yuriy minkin is an instructor of the krav maga federation of ukraine they talked about the weapons register, we also heard the position of our guests, the position of the ministry of internal affairs ministry of internal affairs i have to remind you that the ministry of internal affairs insists that this register should already be operational and that it will help keep track of weapons in ukraine, we were told about this by ihor bondarenko deputy minister of internal affairs of ukraine we have heard two or even three points of view , but here everyone has to draw their own

conclusions. this is precisely why we are discussing this topic so that everyone can, because it is such a difficult topic and i know that here in everyone can have their own opinion, some are for, some are against , but that's why we're here to discuss different points of view and hear them, analyze them, and decide how we feel about it . which we wrote about prince charles, who became a member of the king before becoming a monarch actually charles the third already charles the third , he was a record expert on the british throne or was preparing for this role, well , in fact, 70 years between monarchs, he is such that does not ascend the throne at the oldest age, but hm, which king did britain get after the reign of elizabeth ii and will the change of monarch affect the support of ukraine from the united kingdom , mikolah ihor shevropa talked about it with the

head of the department of international relations , director of the school of political analysis of the kyiv-mohyla academy, maxim how we look, we listen to the democracy of the west, from the change of the monarch, the life of the average citizen will change significantly, then it will be possible to drink from the packages of this state from whoever comes to power there in according to this understanding, the normal system and the democrats are functioning. so everyone should live better, better. maxima . good day. greetings on the first public broadcasting channel. on september 8, the whole world was shocked by the news of the death of the british queen elizabeth ii, and although everyone perfectly understood that sooner or later it had to happen because she already was 96, however, the vast majority of the world's population cannot imagine themselves without the british queen how did you perceive the news of the death of

elizabeth the second quite ambiguously, not in the sense that i do not sympathize with people who sympathize definitely these events and those who you rightly emphasize , considering how yes, she was always here, she was always like that, i see these cool guys, there was communication with students from the youth always gives the opportunity to be familiar with the new humorous culture, but which i liked something like when god created the earth, and then he is asked what day the catalyst of the movement was created, then god says that it was always there, that is, before the big explosion . in terms of politics, to which we still understand in normal countries, the leaders, which are hereditary, they are not connected, although they have in many ways mastered the political culture of their country, so this is true. i support those who say that an entire era has stopped, this is a stop and what should be done for it everyone was waiting and it seems to me that the era for the british monarchy on the one hand has stopped, but has not yet restarted, so because really, as a rule, it is

not that the coronation takes place the next day. well, i will remind you that of all the monarchies of europe in fact coronation as such has long since been abandoned, it is considered to be a relic, you know, not even yesterday, the day before yesterday, this is rituals, there are stones under the throne, these are all the british monarchy - this is what most european countries like. they swear how it was as we saw in the case of the netherlands when the parliament swears in the king and even has options for those who are not religious to take this oath that way well that's why i say that it has ended up because the relaunch of the british monarchy, well, it really has been around for a long enough time, and it is an integral part of the british political culture in general, that is why it is currently on pause, this event put it on pause, and now there is such a transition to charles the third, and we will see how it will develop about karl. we will talk about charles again . i don’t know where these videos are. and i would like to talk about the reign of elizabeth, what

is the name of this era of her reign? and how would you rate it? she was successful, successful in terms of the actions of the queen herself, or what happened during those times, yes, after all, 15 prime ministers is enough, there is a long period purely based on political conditions. yes, but if it was the queen of italy, there would be even more. correct, because there, the political stability of the government is significantly lower than in great britain, and here it depends as much on the king or queen as on the political culture of the country, once and for all, the changes that took place in and during this time are incredible, they are just happening headlong, they are difficult here that is why the changes that took place during this period are clearly a sign of change in the royal court itself. well, it is not such a banal thing that everyone talks about, who you can marry. you know, they never allowed themselves to do this before. in this regard, the monarchy has become a

little softer, so here it is a question of evaluating the queen by her actions, by her behavior, her speech, and possibly some centricity. especially in the work there with photographers, artists, as a rule, they comment on this, and on the other hand, yes, the era was a sign because this period, a lot of things happened back in the elizabethan era, coincided with the beginning of the full-scale aggression of russia against ukraine and the full-scale aggression since the 14th year, if you estimate support of the british monarchy of ukraine in this war well, at least from what i heard that it was one, well, there was an anti-russian position, you know the british and the monarchs of all the rest, they have no choice, because for the russians, the nasaks are just a parable messes around as the main enemy. so there was no choice and one more point. by the way, a very good preliminary question to him can be said that for britain these are the lessons of imperialism, colonialism and so on. it seems to me that there is some kind of envy hidden somewhere in the kremlin under the influence of these ideologues, and maybe even

russian is the depth of the people, yes, you know, somewhere in the states, there are dibsty, yes, in russia, how to call it correctly, eh, britain has this commonwealth, and it functions in canada, we understand there, although in canada the question of what can be cleaned the british monarch with money, yes, but you worked the most in the history of mankind, the empire you worked there with different calculations occupied either a quarter of the globe or a quarter of the population. well, here how to measure is still a question, but they have developed a manner in which you can work with those who would like to stay well, at least somehow in contact with the british monarchy, while conducting its own internal affairs, which britain does not particularly interfere with lack of understanding of how the empire itself can develop, in this regard, it is precisely the view of britain, the support of the british monarchy, including freedom in the broad sense of democracy, the truth in the nation, and so on, it is indisputable, that is, some authoritarian statements of some representatives of the royal court,

well, there are some out there, you have read such strange ones, research them comments are possible, but in general this is a pro-ukrainian and, accordingly, a pro-government british position, we understand that the british monarch is there separately in some way political, but at least i did not come across such statements well, in principle, the british monarchies should be neutral in politics, they do not get involved in politics, and even elizabeth ii, well , they never directly expressed themselves about ukraine, or about russia, instead, she made certain hints , for example, she wore a yellow-blue something, there was blue acid and on yellow you can see the hats in the procolori in russian. it is unlikely that it was so. the most discussed is the true history of brexi there, when all the simple british scoreboards and for serious politicians wrote like this, what do i think, uh our elizaveta yes, and what were the alleged leaks, well, go and check. of course, we don’t hold a candle to what is going on in the palace. yes, but you were like that, and from what i heard from the moments of condemnation of russia ’s actions.

expressions of support there are some by the way humanitarian initiatives you p- spending funds yes, when they say that they are helping more than you, where do the funds come from, although here, too, it is a very delicate game because many of the benefactors are very widespread in britain, in particular, the culture of not testifying, not showing. who gave the funds, it is also necessary to demand that in fact trace the sources of many private sponsors. well, the skills of sponsors are accepted directly by people, and those who give money cannot always be traced directly, this is also one of such directional methods show support, let's go back to the question of charles or karl, after all, it doesn't leave the pages of social networks, it's true. i couldn't even sleep, honestly, i thought because it's not necessary, they even open facebook, oh, it's just not necessary, i'm a father seriously, in fact, there is nothing more to be accepted for work than what to call, well, it is also important, but the authorized representative of the protection of the state language, taras kremin, suggests using king charles the third , but prince charles, referring to traditions, translation , it is one camp that he dominates. my colleague oleksandr

zinchenko, a historian and a journalist, calling the transformation charles karl, i will try to put a german owl on the russian globe, but there is another position from mrs. merlin de simons, the ambassador of great britain, she says that she will call it ukrainian of the new king charles, however, notes that linguists still have to figure out how to correctly call the new head of the british throne ukrainian, so which camp is closer to you, karl, i’m here, well , look, i also wrote about this on facebook , i received either mute comments or those who receive me. the impression is that we into the ukrainian language, we thought about how we transfer names only because of this event, yes. no one said elizabeth is a friend , she was ukrainianized under elizavet, regardless of how she speaks russian, how they say in german, the fact that he is karls rex in latin is true , yes, just like all the kings, and unlike the muscovites, latin in our lands was much better friends, and it was used as the main

written language of the language of education, and kings were not written there, no used by charles or james and so on , every king civilized by a european country had a latin name, this is a tradition yes and i really agree with you that the german tradition, which we can also rely on through the austro-hungarian empire, i don't care what who are the muscovites when the flag is there, but since there were these parts and it must be admitted that they are the closest to us, yes , that is, there is a name that is understood in ukraine and is used much more often than charles. how to wear latin shoes, yes , how to get around ani james? well, let's also be realistic, by the way, this is a normal practice in the majority of slavs, our closest neighbors in slovakia, in the czech republic, there is no question, yes, they use latin, respectively, well, from carlos e build their own on and it's quite normal. even i know that i wrote it incorrectly when i said that it's onomatopoeia, but at least listen to how it sounds and then transmit it in ukrainian. well

, to me, it's a rejection of the first latin e-e language tradition. let me be snoop in this. yes because it is really an age-old tradition that every king has his own latin name and it has been a long time, yes, it is funny that the word king that we have comes from the name of king charlemagne, which is the same as some of you know. one word yes, not understanding what this word means yes charlemagne i think that if you asked me what are you for what should i say charles lyman or charlemagne i will say for charlemagne charles or charles the third well i will be for charles the third i am not i am silent about everyone andriy, yes, he is henry, it is clear that there is a german tradition here, the german language is closer to the transmission of latin counterparts, yes, what force should the globe be pulled on, well, it is clear that how scientists, what if there will be some kind of commission, what is the resolution that it is now correct to use exclusively yes, right then and there same what to do, but i don’t know, i don’t understand the jameses, henri there, charles, it really sounds like that in the original languages ​​yes, but i’ll repeat some established tradition

and by the way, this emphasizes the monarch 6 and heredity, yes , monarchies did not arise yesterday, the ukrainian-speaking foreign country arose, we wrote latin, they knew how it is the following nuances are written that historians and linguists should work with. i don't see a problem with the fact that charles is traditionally referred to as karl, that elizabeth we had elizabeth . i couldn't tell you, my god, what is it, what is it, in what way, what is it now, before we somehow did not reflect on how to name the kings, where are they from, and here we immediately have what is developing so russians. we have to name it. it seems to me that we are, well, we are in the broad sense, after all, the slavs of greece, where the latin academy was founded by the graduates of the kyiv-mohyla academy, yes. that is, we taught them latin and the culture of education. yes, and how to write the royal regalia in latin . once and for the second time, let's start with russia, if at all to refer to some empire, then the austro-hungarian empire, you’re even joking in the austrian empire, the german language what does it matter? yes, a little yes, and

plus german is really closer to the latin corresponding names in this sense, well, practically less, but prince charles inherited the throne and now he is king great britain and so on. and so on, i won’t be able to either. i am in the camp of emelida simons, who will call it ukrainian charles, but for now i will wait for the opinions of ukrainian linguists, what they will say. this will affect our ordinary life of the british, well, besides the fact that now coins and monetary units will print a different profile, if in some of the remaining democracies of the west, the change of the monarch significantly changes the life of the average citizen , then it will be possible to drink according to the package and the state and where in the fact that the monarch has changed and the average citizen somehow depends on whoever comes to power there in this sense, a normal system and

a functional democracy. so everyone should live better, better, this is ideal, yes, those who believe in progress, well, or if stable bad, stable bad yes. at the same time, queen elizabeth was at every step in the life of britain, currency units, well, postage stamps , er, seals, even on mailboxes . elizabeth was around. well, really, you see these realities there, attach the border, you see that everything belongs to passports, i you understand that all this is true, yes, well , you see, it now belongs to another monarch. yes, but i repeat, the system does not change from this, really symbolically. i wonder how it will look, because after all, the king has not been there for a long time. symbolically, it will be really significant and britain will make a lot of money from it, because you just have to make new souvenirs, tell stories, and here it is big, we will not forget that i once asked. well, i studied for a year at the zhivoxer university and communicated. and here are these details, who is the king to whom, who is important to whom, where, with whom he lives, and where you

speak, this is something that interests not only the population of the country itself, but also people abroad, and the danes and the british with whom i spoke at least said , listen, at the level of international relations , politics is beneficial for the country, or only once someone from the royal family goes, it's right away . let's say that you can be amenable to negotiation, and you can definitely make money on this, that is, it is beneficial for the countries from the fact that i heard that this is some kind of trick that a certain country has that can be promoted, so let's see how this function will be performed karl-treti, about whom there are also student jokes, i will hear such a sad face on his face, he says because it was necessary to live to such an age and understand that now you have to work, and there is a destiny in this, they are also talking about what now look what the person who stood in the queue looks like it took 70 years to start, yes. well, karl's fate has turned out. so we already understand, but look, you can't say that he

didn't work for the british monarchy, they perform a lot of all kinds of public functions there, they are headed by all kinds of worms and the whole thing, come on, british culture, you still know that doing charity work is simple and for us, yes, everyone does it in some way, that’s why i’m not saying that he is lazy here, he was doing it, will he continue to do it, in your opinion, will the british rally around charles karl the third thank you through a hyphen to whom if i too i see that some mass media are very much like this. i remember my first visit to great britain. believe me, there was a ukrainian businessman who taught english on the spot. so, this is a stupid experience, and there was one there, someone there, a colleague, an acquaintance, a businessman, he is of origin from well, in words there from india as a broad understanding that was born there for many years and lives there just from the quote community as i understood the communication with him and his colleagues who in principle have a negative attitude to the rotation even that is, no piety before the monarchs they say they are the ones who robbed the whole world and we were robbed by everyone, so we would still feed them, well, poor thing, we continue like this well, here it is possible, that is, there is definitely such a thing in

british society, the share of those who are not satisfied, popularity, the whole story with the princess the diagnosis is yes. this is really not because of anti- popularity, but professor crystal monarchy. anna whitelock interestingly said. vest or died, they violently discuss those times, how they treated diana unfairly, there is a lot of talk about the fact that now king charles the third, and at that time the principle of charles hm, was shown in an unfavorable light. it is because of this situation with diana or will public opinion change or will karl the third gain public support? it might be very tough. we need to meet next time on the topic of how it affects public opinion. this is very cool. will karl the third succeed in changing the public opinion of these young people who watched the same tv series, the crown, using the e method? do it in such a way that he doesn't have any forgiveness for it, yes. what is it to shoot a series

that manipulates public opinion in such a way, there is also nowhere to go from here, just like that, and here it seems to me that there is a struggle, well, this one is in this context or will be some new series is less, but still the best series of life and now it's just carla, you have no right to make a mistake, because it is probably negative to the young people who cited it, because it's such a manipulation of public opinion that works, well, let's see. let's give a person a chance, but i really don't i didn't hear, i didn't know that because of this series, someone doesn't understand, that's why i thank you . he was a prince uh, you know that information when i read about him, that's her uh first how did you understand this, we started our conversation uh, i always wonder at what stage a person says that i'm already too old and i need to pass something on to the young people since

i am 40 years old there, i regularly hear that we are too young for a university there, do you think so? and how old do you have to be to head the department? well, that’s kind of absurd in my opinion. how many years does it take for a person to finally tell me that i’m tired of reigning, i ’ll hand over the crown. well, i already said for example european monarchies that did it in 13-14 years, they handed over the crown, but here i don’t know if after all, after waiting 70 years yes, then he will say no, that’s all, now i am handing over the crown to my son, i don’t think he will do it, he will rather go the way of his mother and in relation to his eccentricity and harshness of statements well, i would also read about it that it was him, i am here convinced that it was he who was a prince, he was allowed to do so in principle well, as i said well, let her express her opinion loudly on various issues and various directions in life, etc. and however, will he be able to become prejudiced at the price of speaking like that ?