it is assumed that enterprises are in the state of wartime regime, both state-owned and private, in our country . preparations for this military mobilization of the economy have been ongoing for several months, and the insiders of the kgb of belarus, under the leadership of the secretary of this security site , have been admitted. both in the field of industry and processing of e in agriculture and food industry of transport enterprises of railways automotive companies and so on that may be involved in the event of the declaration of martial law or further support from the lukashenko regime in the war against ukraine, and such a list was compiled by the middle of which we have the secretary of the security council the leader, general volfovych, a russian speaking general, with the secretariat of the security council of belarus, actually become the chief

of staff for the entire country. he has the right to lead both regionally specific and specific enterprises, if we are talking about the mobilization of the already civil republic of belarus, i think that this question will be resolved here, including depending on whether lukashenko recognizes or does not recognize these fake referendums held on the territory of ukraine. subject to no discussion, we are in favor of the absolute territorial integrity of ukraine. protect the so-called territory of the russian federation, if he does not recognize the result of the referral, you understand that he is throwing down a gauntlet and a very serious challenge to his master in the kremlin, that is why lukashenko has recently started knocking everywhere where an attack is possible, including in the

direction of china to seek support in order to save your school, thank you, then, luchsevych, sign from lithuania, you wanted to close the borders from the russians, that's why we don't ask about the invasion. pseudo-referendums on the territory of ukraine and this mobilization of ours because we understand that lithuania will possibly be next. well, if putin announces a mobilization and carries it out, well, so to speak to god and not limit ourselves to us. of course. we understand very well that uh, this geese, this mobilization can also apply to us, there were also at the end. we have pelmeningrad, unfortunately, not for you, not for us, and our neighbor is not doing very well. that’s why we have an army now there. such an increased

e-e of increased readiness e but e there is no such thing somehow, mrs. what or something, this is definitely not the first time, that's why we calmly look at it, look at it, but we understand that russia is doing everything, russia is trying to intimidate, first of all, because when you lost, and i i believe and the plates believe that er russia has already lost in ukraine er and that's why now it's more of an attempt to scare and regarding the referendum that if i can call it that there won't be a referendum either, i will

show the results of the referendum only three armed forces and only this one we would recognize the referendum, but we will definitely not recognize any of the muscovites, and we will definitely not recognize anything that they are trying to do now, it is blackmail, so it is nothing more than simple blackmail . in connection with this, what other measures may be taken at the level of the country to adopt a fuse. now, if you knew, we do not issue tourist cards to russians. there is, in fact, a comment on the canopy, but they are not issued to me either. quickly and to everyone who wants uh and mobilization for sure

is not a reason to submit a humanitarian visa to the russians because, first of all, we have enormous pressure from society to ensure that nothing like this happens, as we know, and latvia, first of all, was the first to say that it will not accept people who who are trying to weave in from mobilization and then, from the very beginning, in lithuania, society also, uh, began to ask and what are we going to do, or uh, will the tiles somehow mean a humanitarian visa or something, because i have a man in china and quickly the level of ministers they explained that this is not a reason uh, to get a humanitarian visa, that is,

we will definitely not accept all those things, uh, what exactly they will be, all documents will be checked at the borders , uh, and there is no need for any tak or fly -in because, first of all, they wanted to uh, the war came to them, it came, uh, and secondly, we don’t know who uh, among those people it could be, it could be anyone uh, it automatically invites the security of lithuania and we absolutely need these people, mr. pavla mr. pavlo latushka is still with us mr. lukashenko banned the export of industrial goods from belarus what is it about, what is he afraid of, what does it mean, well, in general , you talked about some kind of throwing and

wavering about lukashenka who will flirt. there were restrictions on some goods from belarus, this is really connected with the restriction of imports, because everyone talks about the fall in exports from belarus, but very rarely remembers that imports mean a fall, including goods of general use. and that's why it was literally yesterday the so-called organization in the russian economic union has preserved for another six months the possibility of bringing goods up to 1000 € to individuals in order to fight the deficit of a-a goods if we are talking about throwing lukashenko it is definitely a picture here takes the canvas and draws this twine, about which i remembered the ukrainian tv channels on the twine, it is already so hard for him to hold that he really starts to throw his ego and it is in the direction of china, for example, he

is simply happy happily reports that he was invited by the head of the people's republic of china online with china, what are there billions of contacts, why is he doing this? he is already trying to get protection from china, and the possibility of his security, of course, no one in china considers the serious economic potential of belarus - it's not even crumbs on the table, it's actually dust from the point of view of china's economic interests, but china can play the situation in the role it can, let's say so, ensure the introduction of russian federation troops into the territory of belarus again and show its role in this serious the world and military-political crisis, and here lukashenko is knocking on the door of china, but again , if we are talking about the normalization of relations with europe, which also sends a certain signal, yesterday a large analytical analysis prepared by lukashenka's

strategic research service came out, then this analysis is all the same presupposes from eh let's say the release of political prisoners liberating to go from prisoners is similar to death for lukashenko after all this immediately provokes internal protests in in the country, the introduction of the army would again ask the russian federation, it is internal protests in the country not to introduce it, it is a threat from russia, from putin's side, the possible physical liquidation of lukashenko, that is, no matter where he rushes , the momentum that carries him nowhere in the situation does not guarantee his survival, so he is more likely to benefit from it they are wasting time playing foreign political tricks and trying to see what will happen to his main master putin, whether his political death will happen, but i think that lukashenko's fate has already been decided, no matter what it was not ukraine and ukrainians, not belarusians, who did not forgive him those who committed the crime. well, i don't think that europeans are ready to shake his hand

in the future. thank you, mr. pavlo, and i also wanted to ask ms. anna about this moment. since the 23rd year, latvia has been revoking residence permits in russia, jan, who do not know the latvian language, respectively, what is the situation in lithuania with regard to the fact that we do not have many people who do not know the lithuanian language and who communicate exclusively in russian, for example, because the russians who live in us are either citizens of lithuania uh, what are there somewhere around five percent 55% pe- i apologize uh or uh belarusians who uh after the 20th year uh came to us because of lukashenko's dictation or uh ukrainians who are now staying with us -e that is, these are categories absolutely no one - no one will

tell me anything, and regarding our er-er, it would be possible to arrange them for ukrainian lithuanian language courses, why not, by the way, there is er-er there is a compulsory line history course, but we, we, we are in ukraine we will not be offended, we will only be happy that at the expense of the republic of lithuania, so to speak, the linguistic a picture of our fellow citizens, i speak well, your business. i always tell you about this and where i set an example to our officials who say there. well, i haven't learned it yet, i say dana daushkevich is alive. thank you for beautiful ukrainian for all the time on our air. and on daushkevich, a lithuanian journalist from pavlo latushko was also with us, the deputy head of the united transitional cabinet of belarus was with us, we talked about

belarus, we talked about lithuania and we are moving on, we will remember a not very pleasant moment in our history called the kharkiv agreements so to speak, the signing, in particular, of the organizers of the so -called kharkiv agreements, the state council is suspected, well , some of the people, so to speak, we hope we will see real sentences, well, in any case, the court allowed the arrest of ex-ministers lavrynovych and hryshchenko for the kharkiv agreement, the document provided for a discount on gas in exchange on which the basing of the russian fleet in the temporarily occupied sevastopol year 2042 was the final date according to this document, the basing of the russian fleet in the crimea then took place in the verkhovna rada and for a very long time it's a pity it was not possible to stop these capitulating collaborators, let's look at the plot and proceed to the

analysis of similar scenarios. on april 27, 2010, under the cover of umbrellas, speaker volodymyr lytvyn puts to a vote the ratification of the so-called kharkiv agreements. 236 deputies vote, almost in full, regional communists and members of the lytvyn bloc the kharkiv agreements themselves were signed a week before that vote , viktor yanukovych and the then president of russia dmitry medvedev put their signatures under the document, we are at the very beginning with dmitry anatolych, they agreed that we will not talk about the bad and do better. the essence of the agreement was that the black sea fleet’s stay in sevastopol was extended for 25 years until 2042. in exchange, ukraine received a discount on russian gas after the annexation of crimea in 2014. russia

terminated the agreement in march 2021. the national security and defense council instructed the sbu to study the circumstances of the people's deputies' voting of the sixth convocation for the kharkiv agreements, and in case of confirmation of signs of treason, to initiate criminal proceedings against them. however, suspicions were announced not against the deputies but to the former ministers of foreign affairs, kostyantyn hryshchenko, justice oleksandr lavrynovych, defense mykhailo yezhel, as well as the then president viktor yanukovych and prime minister mykola azarov. we include in our analysis oleksandr doniya, people's deputy of ukraine, 6th and 7th convocations of the participant of the revolution on the granite and the rest of the ukrainian revolutions, as well as taras chornovol

people's deputy of ukraine of the third, fourth , fifth, and sixth convocations, as well as an extremely active advocate of ukrainian sovereignty since the 90s. glory to ukraine, gentlemen, i hear you say that compared to what the russian federation is doing now, the kharkiv agreements seem to be inferior in scale, but then a certain time bomb was planted on your opinion, why, what was this treacherous kremlin plan? the directions were olesya. thank you for your attention to this issue. i think that the bomb was planted even earlier in the early 90s. it was one of the biggest

mistakes of the ukrainian state officials there, and when it was agreed on the presence of the so-called russian black sea fleet on ukrainian territory, let me remind you that the first demands of the ukrainian state were the withdrawal of the black sea fleet and the russian, then initially the soviet fleet, after it failed to fully ukrainize it, because at first ukraine raised the question of that all the servicemen of the ussr who are on the territory of ukraine, including the americans and military captains, they are part of the ukrainian army, a photo of the russian - this was not agreed to. the second demand was to withdraw to novorossiysk and or other ports. but ukraine did not insist, did not achieve this , it was laid down then back in the early 90s, it worked during the so-called kharkiv agreements, because it was an act of not just high treason, in particular,

vote falsification. the only thing i can do to correct your story is that you are correct in your story 236 deputies were called to vote. this is not the person who suffered the most. then all the strong people were there because i was defending my job as a deputy. i will remind you that you were in the hospital with a severe concussion for two months. beatings in the session hall we remember those eloquent shots right now thank you dose there was an opportunity to talk again and p parking lot and it is worth promoting criminal

proceedings criminal case but the physical of these were brought before that to the hall so-called carcasses therefore the voting was with someone else's cards and accordingly this is a falsification of the vote and we defended our own workplaces what did the bandit deputies do then directly the bandits claim from the parties of the regions personally held me by five deputies , we hit them from behind from above, the so-called deputy is a typewriter, why is the so-called deputy god? it's normal. he was a deputy. and before that, he was in three on fur then there was renata akhmetova, and he directly hit me, and they held such moscow, for example, oliynyk, who now we do not get out of moscow , then in fact six bipods, but who made the decision, and those who implemented the falsification directly. they should be judged not only by these

two ministers, i claim that falsification, which means it is necessary to promote the case. everyone should be punished. this is an extremely important point, mr. taras, so accordingly, i would like to ask you about the specifics. who actually implemented this? the idea is to allow the russian federation and the occupation entities to gain a foothold, uh, all of you poplars, we understand that this story is not only about a few ministers who are currently being sought , and certainly not only them. this is much longer, the whole story here, you know, i can just it is easier to fully agree with everything that oles has just said in all the details. i absolutely agree with this. in fact, they can only supplement the entire period from the time of kravchuk, when in fact sevastopol was surrendered and the black sea fleet was surrendered, and many you asked for it, they also handed over nuclear weapons without real guarantees to budapest. it was profanation and everything else, they asked for the property of the former union, everything else

was very, very inadequate people came to power who, well, had not that much experience, well, kravchuk this was a person who was engaged in by ideology in the cpsu, you understand what an ideologue is. he is a person who only lies and nothing else, but unfortunately, since that time, a number of ruling elites have changed, even during the period of yushchenko's rule, even the bulk of those who will be slightly lower than him, he said there let's deal with the black sea fleet by the 17th year . will leave and we need to look for some options to somehow prevent this, so that people in ukraine are not so indignant and that russia calms down, if somehow to weaken their presence there, to weaken, and not to fulfill the agreement, the constitutional norm so that in the 17th year it has

to get out of there forever, and that is why the kharkiv agreements were prepared by several generations of ukrainian politicians who repeatedly repeated it. we can not drive russia out of sevastopol. it seems to me that they do not mention this moment, but those agreements and certain gas agreements and everything else were prepared all the previous years, that is, the prerequisites were created when as if it was coming out, yanukovych came and said and what and how could it be otherwise if everything was brought under this circumstance unfortunately, exactly such circumstances will be there, that's why there were quite a lot of people who contributed to this movement is now there is one point on which mr. oles also emphasized. i testified. no, i was not a deputy, but then, when only the revolution of dignity won, i

told the prosecutor general's office about all the circumstances that existed, and then i emphasize. now i will actually open criminal cases against the deputies for the fact that they you can't vote, because it directly violates the article of the constitution, but what was emphasized there was a falsification of the vote, and for this , people who were physically absent in the hall, what can be established? pressed on other people's cards, people who organized this vote, lytvyn, certain people from the apparatus of the council, certain people there, those of the counting commission that checked these data, then they should face criminal charges responsibility because it does not fall under the immunity of deputies responsible, this is a direct forgery, the deputy is not responsible for the votes that he himself makes, he himself, that is, those who

voted . and this accent is shifted as regards lavrynovych and hryshchenko well, yes, they are responsible, but then they were preparing, signing, coordinating with dozens of other people, and the worst, i think, criminal actions were in it is very important to the then administration of the president and there, god, it is very important to take a serious look at who conducted the document circulation on these issues, because the main decisions were laid there and there were people who directly carried it out . were these the first here or not the first but the next steps and why did crimea become difficult if there were no kharkiv agreements? the threat of invasion was bought or he was so stupid that he did not understand what he was doing. that is

why we will become taras . the ukrainian special services and among the ukrainian e-e deputies, and unfortunately the conditions for war were being laid even then, because i can say that due to a significant part of the russian elite, the desire and readiness for occupation or at least an attempt to split ukraine, and it seemed that then in 1991, he had the opportunity to be on one conference that was organized was in germany from ukraine, there were four people from russia, the whole world of theirs at that time was the liberal world , and i remember how upset, for example, karagan was still considered more or less liberal at the time. he was then the director of the institute of the usa and canada. this is an

intellectual and summer russia and how he shouted that your ukraine is 2-3 years old and we will destroy it in two or three years in 1991, and that is why the russian black sea fleet was considered by non-russians as one of the tools not just to stay but resistance against ukraine and in the future as one of the options for military action, that is, it was considered by at least part of the elites back in 1991, and then these elites, the so-called hawks, finally came. and if yeltsin put putin in power, that is, it is his continuation, in fact yanukovych was looking for a weakness, it was such a weakness when a bandit group came to power and they did not even think about the state interest, but rather they think more about our economic interests, so they gradually surrendered

because i don't think that yanukovych had an immediate intention to crush ukraine, nor did he gradually close this loophole, but putin used it, already understanding how he could, sorry, the tool of the russian black sea fleet as a military tool, what did they do with the rest when the occupation of crimea and eastern ukraine already in 2014, mr. taras, you know when we talk about yanukovych, he didn't think of anyone strategic, for certain periods he even did some things there, a person, third, fourth year, true. i hear that when he was prime minister, everything will be fine even some successful things in the economy, there is still something, but he did not have an understanding of the strategic, certain goal of the intention and development of ukraine, and therefore it was very easy to buy him with statements, a tarno, a find at aaa, $100 per thousand cubes, as far as i remember, and there, what was that price for ? for which he was ready to hand over

those things, he did not understand at all and what is changing well, what is stopping us is the black sea fleet? thought about what there will be something terrible in the future, i don't think about the war, but more than that, i remember that the rashists mainly wanted to destroy the country from the middle, destroy it, make it out of it, well, like what lukashenko did with belarus, they managed to change the situation in belarus back then in 1994 kardyna ruchna in 1991 was three heads ahead in terms of reforms in everything, they elected democracy, we elected the most zealous communists. but later they saw that everything in ukraine had somehow stalled. in 2004, when he told me, well, here we are all the time . we hope that there is someone of ours, here is our kuchma

. how to watch что с етим делать so that there were really ours and not our gloves, something like this was the conversation . people would say who could have produced those papers, and it is not only about former minister hryshchenko, do you remember such a well-known figure of ukrainian state-building, pandemchenko, who was recently discovered by the intelligence committee, yes? well, i don't know how his fate has turned out now. at that time he seems to have been deputy minister of foreign affairs hryshchenko, against whom a case was filed, he had just taken office at that time, but obviously he played his role, he was on one committee of the verkhovna rada, he reported on this, but i well

podyramchenko is a well-known story, the thing is that there are those who formally accompany and there are certain groups who, you know, lead the contractarians, unfortunately, it exists now, and then it was, well, just an absolute watcher in politics, an observer of international relations, and when they now mention hryshchenko, well, what he agreed to commit an act of banditry. he agreed to enter into an inadmissible agreement. he must answer for this. there is no question here , but he was not the initiator. i knew his position very well. at that time, he was far from buried in these agreements, but he was told that he executed because the people who carried out all those postings, which are written out, you know, written out there is a certain strategic plan to work with this, to work on this, to convince this, to press on this, there is such a certain mafia structure, you have to look at the action of the mafia, you can understand how the same kharkiv agreements were carried out under for introducing it into this circulation in order for it to work, and

a number of senior leaders of the presidential administration and a little lower representatives there sat on it, and according to them, in general, there was never a single time. testified about the circumstances of how it all happened in the verkhovna rada and everything else. i also mentioned then that i remembered the names of all the people in the administration of president yanukovych back then and reminded them why you don't open criminal cases against them. they had sex there directly that the new investigative cycle will bring interesting names and criminal cases will also be initiated against them for this, without a doubt, bandit act of treason against the ukrainian state. thank you, mr. oles . convocation yes, antinbarkovskyi, thank you for being there this morning from the espresso, i will continue, melnyk is already ready to tell about everything that did not work