so that before christ before the gospel it should encourage you to roll up your sleeves and take on the politics of moscow to influence it, and what do you think about the russian orthodox church itself, because here we are also witnessing an incredible thing in history when an entire church organization, a huge christian one, supports the war , blesses the war in essence, or were in history , let's say again in the second world war, the protestant church of germany, the lutheran church , it also clearly supported the war, for which it later officially expressed its remorse so there were precedents in the past, unfortunately, but precisely

because they were in the past precisely because we know how it ends. i am simply surprised that the moscow patriarchate is so dominated by obedience to a single principle. what is it? they don't look in history textbooks and they don't see the abyss they are facing. what do you think about the humanitarian situation with the russians, because there are serious discussions in europe right now about accepting russian refugees? not accepting those fleeing from mobilization. positions among different european countries of different politicians, let's say there the president of the czech republic, milos zemanyky, considers the president of russia putin a madman and a war criminal, believes that russians should be accepted, and other czech politicians say that they should not be sent here, in the baltic

countries they say that they should not be sent here, but in germany they say that deserters must be accepted, there is no common european opinion, and how should this be approached now? i don't have the feeling that i know the moment of truth. it seems to me that both are simple solutions, namely all accepting without examination and not accepting anyone are too simple in order to reflect the reality of life. i think there are different situations, there are situations of really desperate humanitarian need , er, um, to go meet er people, but there is a danger that this will replenish the ranks of er, those demonstrators, let's say in germany, who are protesting against the fact that

germany supports ukraine, that is, there is such a danger and such a danger, and i repeat that i do not know the wisest solution. how do you generally perceive the atmosphere in ukrainian society now? what in your opinion, it can be said that this is a consolidation, or maybe when the situation on the front is weakened, we again observe the same trends of misunderstanding among ukrainian citizens that existed in the pre-war period. i think that underneath they are always just modulations and uh, they correspond to our optimism about victories on the front or our pessimism or what is the misunderstanding between ukrainians, this is the

fate that still awaits us because during the war , fortunately, each of us has this the feeling that we are not dare to hatch it anyway, sometimes they hatch, but still many people watch over themselves after the war er this feeling er um there will be no danger and then we will have a serious problem, that is, our er sins remain with us and we will not run away from them, but i think that ukrainian society is still in its best state today, i honestly confess to you, i did not think that ukrainians would be able to resist so resolutely

, so monolithically, the supreme court is, despite all that, and it is impressive today uh the whole world because the whole world knows about these are our weaknesses, but ours is about our propensity for internal enmity. i am grateful to the ukrainians. i am grateful to every ukrainian for the fact that we try to be prudent and try to support each other in times of war and stand with one front . of the ukrainian catholic university on our tv broadcast. i will now go to the interactive , you can ask your questions before i

see them, but i want to talk, er, about the topic that i now hear literally from every social network that people are actively discussing and which we started discussing at the beginning of our conversation with you when we discussed this topic with the people's deputy of ukraine mykola knyazhytskyi, this is a question of whether or not the president of russia volodymyr putin, uh, can use nuclear weapons against ukraine, first of all, i want you and i to proceed from a fairly simple formulation , the use of nuclear weapons by vladimir putin can not have an obvious reason, that is, we all the time we are looking for some reasons, not reasons, let's say the country's accession to nato, it must be clearly understood that this was not the reason for russia's attack on ukraine, the situation with the issue of the occupied

donbas not being resolved. exclusively so that there was an opportunity to attack ukraine, so that the occupied territories would turn into a bridgehead for a further attack, and so here can we assume that the holding of pseudo-referendums on the territory luhansk, zaporizhzhia, kherson and donetsk regions with their further inclusion in the russian federation may be the reason for vladimir putin to use nuclear weapons, or even if vladimir putin will really be forced to defend what he considers the territory of the russian federation and then he can use nuclear weapons

against ukraine. here i am i would like you and i to correctly line up the consequences and causes of actions and how a decision is made in crimea, how a decision is made by the russian political by the leadership simply at least based on my own experience of monitoring the procedure for making these decisions, and this in general. by the way, it is related to almost all authoritarian regimes, how decisions are made in them , first the decision is made, let's say on the pasta, here we meet at a meeting of the security council of the russian federation or in a narrower circle of vladimir putin and his closest associates and we decide that the ukrainian issue should be finally resolved by military means and after we decide that

solution, we are looking for excuses to attack ukraine and these ghosts can be completely fanciful, you can invent an excuse in the case of the recognition of the so-called independence of the people's republics, which we did not consider to be any people 's republics in russia until that day how we did not recognize their independence and called them officially separate districts of the donetsk and luhansk regions of ukraine and emphasized that we stand for the territorial integrity of ukraine, so much so that we have found this reason and we are confidently following this path and even we already forget that just a few days before the announcement of the recognition of this independence, we continued to emphasize that it would not happen and that even the united russia faction in the state duma of the russian federation submitted a compromise draft resolution that was significantly different from the draft resolution that was submitted to the faction of the

communist party of russia and demanded from the president of the russian federation recognition of the independence of the dnr and the people's republic of china because we needed a reason to understand the reason and not the cause of this war, the same applies to the use of nuclear weapons or it can be assumed that the introduction of the status of russian territories for occupied russia and regions of ukraine, donetsk, luhansk, kherson, zaporozhye regions must necessarily lead to the use of nuclear weapons. nuclear weapons against ukraine, here we have made such a decision that we must drop a nuclear bomb on them for some reason to destroy the defense capability of their armed forces and

to increase the opportunities for our army to occupy the next ukrainian districts to intimidate them so that they capitulate to us to obtain some new concessions of a political nature from them to intimidate the west so that it does not help ukraine from a military point of view, there are many different reasons that can lead to the adoption of exactly such a decision in the office of vladimir putin, then we begin to look for a reason, what kind of reason should it be , is it suitable for us, let's say the declaration of independence of the dpr, the lpr, these of them are not included in the further incorporation the composition of the russian federation is suitable. is it suitable for us if we include , say, the kherson

zaporozhye region in the russian federation? everything is suitable. please tell me, but the shelling by ukrainian troops of the territory of the autonomous republic of crimea is suitable as an excuse to use nuclear weapons if we want to. belgorod or kursk region. and if not , the ukrainian armed forces will fire at the belgorod or kursk region, and the russians themselves will say that these are ukrainian troops. whether or not the excuse is appropriate is absolutely obvious, if, say, you go around the center of belgorod and say that these are ukrainian troops, then you can justify it for the use of nuclear weapons against the ukrainian state and against the ukrainian people, it depends solely on what excuse the president of the russian federation chooses for the use of nuclear weapons weapons is like

aggression, one should not confuse reasons and ghosts, therefore, in fact, to be absolutely precise from a mathematical point of view, it is precisely the proclamation of the russian statute of donetsk as the status of donetsk of the luhansk, kherson, zaporizhzhia regions can be the same reason for using nuclear weapons as any other reason chosen by the kremlin, this is a very important moment, and this moment, in my opinion, is the main one from the point of view of this whole discussion that we are having with you on this topic, do we know that vladimir putin has made a decision on the principled use of nuclear weapons in the situation with ukraine? no, we do not know this, and how absolutely correct my interlocutors are saying here on this broadcast, in fact, the approval such a decision will depend on a whole series of

reasons, one of these reasons is, of course, how the west will react to not adopting such a decision, how western politicians will be able to make it clear to the president of the russian federation, vladimir putin , and maybe not only to him, but to his entourage and the russian military that the use of the russian the use of nuclear weapons by the federation against ukraine can have catastrophic consequences for the russian federation. of the russian federation and the survival of the regime, not the state , because these people are absolutely not interested in the state, the state is interested in the regime, then of course there will be a rather serious story related to what the situation will look like in the future with the development

of events precisely from the point from the point of view of nuclear blackmail of ukraine and the civilized world, this is basically how everything looks, and i think that in this situation the moment of deterring aggression is also absolutely obvious, that is, it is not a matter of striking russia in the event that it develops nuclear weapons, viktor yaskiv asking whether the united states or great britain would dare to carry out a real nuclear attack on russia, first of all, i advise you to exclude great britain from this list in general , it should be viewed as a struggle between nato and russia, nuclear potential is not a separate potential of great britain or france. they have a rather small nuclear potential and they do not have a nuclear weapon, unlike the united states and russia and china, and this, too, must be realized, this is a very important point, and from the extent to which it will be clear that

such a blow can be inflicted, but i would like to remind you once again that from a technical point of view there are only two countries that have a sufficient number of nuclear reserves to fight each other, and in this situation we must realize that only these two countries also have a nuclear triad, a nuclear triad china still has, but china does not have a sufficient number of warheads, so that there are only two countries in the world today that are real nuclear states capable of destroying everything around, the united states and the russian federation, and of course, from this point of view, there is no great britain and no france will not act independently against russia, well, this is just a reality, will the united states build a nuclear attack on

russia in the event of its use of nuclear weapons? the number of bombings will disappear as a result of the exchange of strategic nuclear strikes , the largest cities of the world will begin a nuclear winter , millions of people will die, a million people will die in the coming years from e-e radiation diseases will completely change, the economic and social situation in the world will start serious diseases , that is, it will be the apocalypse, and i do not think that we should think about it, but we should think about how to stop the possibility of using nuclear weapons with the subsequent death of people, and at least tactically, nuclear weapons are still quite important the points that can stop the use of tactical nuclear weapons against ukraine may be the understanding by the russian political military leadership that this will not lead to a breakthrough at the front but may lead to serious consequences from the point of view of the military

and political situation. in russia itself, there is another rather important point that can keep the president of the russian federation until a certain point from using such means. this is a change in the position of his allies. we do not know how the people's republic of china will react. the people 's republic of china exists in the concept of non-application the first nuclear weapon, if russia uses nuclear weapons as the first non- nuclear state, it can spoil russian-chinese relations, at least for today, it looks like this, and we are fine with we can see how the whole situation in russia's relations with the countries of the global south is changing, and the question always arises whether russia in this situation of international isolation in which she found herself in the west will take risks even with these relations, this is a very important, very obvious

moment president zelensky will complain in his interview that israel does not provide any aid to ukraine. as far as i understand, we are talking about military aid. what can you say about the information that is spread in the israeli e-e media about the beginning of supplies of ukraine through poland of systems for combating israeli drones. i would like to have more accurate information. i believe that the supply of iranian drones to ukraine to russia so that it can more effectively fight ukraine is to some extent a turning point in this war. for israel it turns out that ukraine is a real common enemy of israel and real common interests because israel has always opposed the continuation of the so-called nuclear agreement

between iran and the western countries and russia bearing in mind that the implementation of this agreement will give the tyrant an opportunity to strengthen his own economy and thus accelerate not even the moment when iran prepares nuclear weapons. although this is also possible, but the moment for an attack and wound on israel and for the start of a new great middle eastern war in which hundreds of thousands of people may die again, and now it turns out that ukraine is not interested in restoring this nuclear agreement, as it was famously torn up by the president of the united states, donald trump, and the administration of president joseph biden is, in principle, interested in returning to of this agreement. and now two important allies of israel and the allied states of israel and ukraine , they can join forces to stop the biden administration from renewing this nuclear agreement early in exchange for

advising efforts to overthrow both the theocratic regime and the russian autocratic one regime to create conditions for the complete destabilization of both terrorist countries and to help the transition of power in these countries to those political forces that will be able to cooperate with measures and to debunk all these and these goals that the iranian yatole set for themselves after the so -called islamic revolution of 1979 and the russian revolution of 1979 and the russian chekist bandits after their complete seizure of power in the russian federation in 2000. i am absolutely sure that only the dismantling of the terrorist iranian regime and the terrorist russian regime and with the subsequent collapse of their leaders and legal proceedings over the national leader has a melting stone if he is alive and we see that he is in a very serious condition so and to the trials of the national leader vladimir putin, they are very similar, by the way,

if he is alive, because we understand that as a result of any russian revolution , only such determined people can physically destroy the entire russian leadership even at the time of his transportation to prison radical actions can save humanity otherwise, you know, we can discuss with you 100 times when putin will drop a nuclear bomb on ukraine or on ukraine, but the day when russia and iran will drop nuclear bombs will come, i am practically in it i'm sure it doesn't have to be in the war against ukraine, but i can already clearly sign out from this point of view as an analyst for a million people, the ticket is death if these regimes will exist here, ukraine and israel need to join forces, and i am surprised by the naivety of the israeli government, which believes that he can hide from these world -level challenges in his own region because it used to be possible

to hide when the whole conflict between israel and its neighbors was so jewish-arab conflict jewish-arab conflict ended we can say that in the 70s, when sadat, the president of the arab republic of egypt, tried to go to jerusalem and signed a peace agreement with israel, it also gave a start to all subsequent processes of israeli- arab reconciliation, which we see before our eyes , but another conflict appeared, much more serious, and this conflict between authoritarian democracy between the right of peoples to have their own states and the right of the sovereign to destroy peoples and states, and this question is very simple. will there be a jewish state in the middle east in the future in principle and will there be a ukrainian state in central europe in the future, and no one today will give you an exact answer to any of these questions , if both states win, they may disappear

from the political map of the world along with their population , and in order to survive, you need to join forces and i say once again that it is very surprising to me that the israeli political class was not up to the task of understanding these problems, while for decades the founding fathers of israel showed a clear intuition from the point of view of understanding the challenges that are facing the jewish state, i wrote about it in the non-russian-speaking israeli press, tried to explain it and will continue to work with it because i am simply surprised, surprised vitaliy risech writes, what do you say about the demand for weapons from western partners by the president and the president's office, even somewhat hamato rhetoric of these issues that this is not a deterrent factor in decision-making by israel and germany and others because we are not in the position to demand and

dictate to indicate i am in shock and here is this and also this is all pouring into the ears of our refugees who, being abroad, live in the ukrainian space and begin to demand something there and present something , the french are already joking among themselves that they should get a ukrainian passport, because then they will be able to have a member cruisers to get housing without financial aid or even to build a local government. let the french from france come to ukraine, dear mr. vitaly, live under rocket fire. let russian missiles fly into their houses, let them stand on corpses of their children and then go to france as refugees and get a land cruiser, you can use a wheelchair or maybe without eyes or maybe without ears when the french joke among themselves i remind you that they can live because they live in a peaceful world for now and if the ukrainians do not demand something then france may become one of the rns of a nuclear war between the russian

federation and nato. radiation sickness, they will not need a land cruiser and will just need to count how many members of their family are still alive and who have already died, they will not have money for a funeral either, believe me, the situation is not as bright as it seems to people who do not live in the state war. i am absolutely sure that ukraine should demand more weapons from the west. i am absolutely sure that the governments of israel and germany are not aware of this threat, which is secondary to them. the tonality is very important from the point of view of public opinion. we have seen that this public opinion forces politicians who were hiding from real challenges to change their situation, but i repeat all the trials for europeans are just beginning, the reality is that the european continent will not be a continent that can be satisfactory for life in the next 20-30 years, so that you will not have life at all, it is at the level there of

10-20% of the total, believe me and our task to avert this threat on february 24 is the starting shot of a gun that can destroy europe from lisbon to vladivostok, charles de gaulle dreams in about a united europe from lisbon vitali i can absolutely guarantee you that there will be no life in this space from lisbon to vladivostok only animals will run if we do not stop this situation above you will see what the consequences of neglecting the danger can be and you may not see because you will also die i didn’t see it because i died. well, we will exchange our impressions somewhere in another world , and then i will be able to answer all your questions in a calmer rhythm, because we will have eternity ahead of us, but i would like to dear sir

welcome to answer you in this world and i do not think that we are in the wrong position to demand and dictate when the nation, the state is on the verge of extinction, and ukraine is in exactly such a situation, we are on the verge of extinction, and ukraine as a state and the ukrainian people, believe me, is exactly the same the level of the danger of extinction, we can win or disappear and there will be nothing here, not even in the matter of nuclear danger. and the question is simply vladimir putin's desire to expel all the non -loyal population from here, so why can't we demand if we have nothing to lose, i apologize, there is simply nothing to lose until the moment when ukrainians do not realize the level of this danger, we will live with you in an extremely dangerous world, even in our own country they did not realize that on february 24, 20202 , the collective was exactly a suggestion . conclusions if

europeans live in some kind of collective self-consciousness and it means nothing. well, they will live and then die. i urge all of you to live in the real world, the real world is not comfortable, they shoot in it they kill, kneel, think about new people, hateful steps, but the real world is much more comfortable than the world of your amazing fictions , because the world of amazing fictions unfortunately, there is no material substance . of our fictions, and i believe that when we believe in reality, when we don't believe in paradise, we see reality, this is the only real way to victory. and by the way, when a person understands reality, that's when things happen to that person real miracles are connected with her ability to accurately

respond to a challenge, and when a person does not see reality, then no miracles happen to her, she just dies in this dizziness in which she is. all important questions in the news release prepared by our colleagues, the letter d is literally here in a few seconds, the letter, please , my greetings to everyone who is with us yana i