poland will not let in russians who until now supported putin's regime but decided to leave due to mobilization, but the border will remain open for those citizens who suffered repression due to political beliefs and the struggle for human rights in russia. held a meeting regarding the admission of russians fleeing from mobilization to europe, they agreed to instruct the european commission to update the principles of visa policy for russia yes yes yes european politics in particular and what will happen today at the un security council pseudo-referendums in the occupied territories of ukraine should be discussed at the request of ukraine let us remind you that it was our country that initiated the extraordinary emergency meeting of the united nations security council we really hope that there will be a reaction of the participating countries and the international community in general does ukraine on the territory of russia on

the territory of ukraine well, the european union under no circumstances recognizes pseudo-referendums in the occupied territories russia is trying to repeat the events of the 14 year and the scenario in crimea and holds fake referendums even though its troops do not control the entire territory, the deputy director of the european external action service for eastern europe u pier stated this, where at the same time russia is again threatening ukraine with nuclear weapons and even used the platform for this e-e of the un general assembly last week, it is obvious that all those involved in holding referendums will be brought to justice, this will be a reason for additional restrictive measures measures and further sanctions against russia will include new restrictions on export-import operations, cover new sectors of the economy, and extend the validity of sectoral

restrictions. minister for european and euro-atlantic integration 16-19 years old ms. ivanna, congratulations, congratulations. today, there will be a council meeting where the actions of russia, in particular its pseudo-referendums, will be considered, but we understand that russia has blocking the right of veto, and on the other hand, we can roughly guess how neutral china will behave during the vote. your predictions are that it will use it as a platform for itself and for its propaganda and for the lies that it spreads around the world, and i believe that without that you deprive russia of membership in the un security council in general , and not only the right of veto. hmm, this is this conflict

cannot be resolved within the framework of international law , and therefore absolutely supports what charm-michel spoke about as the president of the european council, who believes that russia should be stripped of its membership in the un security council, moreover, and you and i understand that , in fact, russia is very tentative. ivanno , can you hear us? the prime minister for european and euro-atlantic integration in 16-19 well, let's hope that the connection will now be restored. it is an extremely important story. please show the connection. russia, russia is such a pseudo-member.

in your opinion, there are prospects for applying the mechanisms of the un general assembly. well, because the radbes in the current situation will most likely be really blocked by the vetoing vote of russia. er, there is a resolution accordingly adopted at the beginning of this full-scale invasion. well, actually at the beginning of the war, which russia started back in the 14th year. but at the same time, let 's talk about er, about using this mechanism. i have not heard that our diplomats have initiated

such an additional opportunity. it is quite likely that by using the platform of the un security council, they may resort to turning to the general assembly in order to pass a resolution condemning russia in these additional crimes that it is committing . what it is doing to the territory of the occupying er-e ukrainian, you know, i generally think that ah, well, any actions taken by the occupying russian authorities in the occupied territories of ukraine are simply crimes and they er cannot be discussed at all from the point of view of common sense as somehow legitimizing er its presence because it is an aggressor country and most of the organizations of the united nations agree with this ms. ivanu putin and medvedev er babble about the possible the use

of nuclear weapons by russia. so we understand that fake procedures of so-called pseudo-referendums are currently underway, which in fact do not mean anything to the entire international community, but for russia it may be a pretext . medvedev is safe today, we still have such a document called the budapest memorandum, and guarantees and so on were written in black and white. are there any prospects for using this mechanism now, because the difficult intervention of the russian federation is already underway, not a simple conventional one the war is the largest in the history of europe since the end of the second world war . it is about the possible use of nuclear weapons against a country that voluntarily transferred its existing

arsenal under the guarantees of the international community. well, you you know, you and i have already made sure that the budapest memorandum turned out to be such a fig leaf, in fact, the consultation mechanism provided for by it was applied back in early march 2014, but it did not have any serious consequences as part of this mechanism and of those countries that were signatories of the budapest memorandum. russia then simply did not appear at this consultation. well, accordingly, we and you have no reason to believe that russia will now decide to participate in any consultations. within the framework of the budapest memorandum, what's more, we see that these kremlin leaders and pseudo -gochilniks are also eh they are trying not only to threaten

the use of nuclear weapons, but also to threaten the impossibility of eh again for ukraine to defend itself in all possible ways and we have to how can i take these statements seriously enough? i believe that we should insist in our dialogue with countries that have nuclear weapons with nuclear countries that, after all, their reaction is not limited exclusively to threats there there will be some colossal serious consequences for the russian federation, and it would be much more clear to declare their position a-a that could restrain er-e russia er-e not only from the threat of using tactical nuclear weapons because we see a-e they say ot medvedev for what they said or if someone attacks us well, we

understand that no one is attacking them and they themselves fell on our land and then they will say that we are attacking them on our land or as the second reason he says he calls this one the reason for saying that if something threatens the existence of the russian federation itself, you and i understand that our victory will definitely threaten the existence of the russian federation, therefore, these statements must be treated seriously and responsibly and work hard to work with all our sovereigns for that and for that to stop these madmen. and according to your information , are the countries serious? well, we in general, the international community treats this, these statements now, have the negotiations of the search working groups intensified options for the reaction to the use of weapons, well , it is precisely about the discussion of the next package of

sanctions against the russian federation, and it is already happening. i hope that such a reaction will be very quick. but again, look, russia is counting on what will be found. this is such a weak link among the countries of the european union or the countries of the g20, g7 through which they will be able to act, and here we are. it is important that these weak links do not appear and that no one is scared and didn't start forcing er us to a peace that will definitely not become peace and will become a respite for the russian federation for the next attack, the complete annexation of the temporarily occupied territories , for which the kremlin is preparing, what it can mean in the context of, in particular, the use of tactical nuclear

weapons, it is not for nothing that the enemy is in such a hurry on the one hand on the other hand, what are the reasons for their haste? that is, we understand that the fighting is going on, but the ground is just burning under their feet and they are carrying out all these lying procedures. i think that we must understand with you that moscow dared to type precisely because she feels that she is losing in this war, that she is suffering military defeats after defeats, and in this way she is trying not only to physically mobilize more and more of her citizens for the war against ukraine, but and somewhere to mobilize as she thinks, uh, well , patriotic mood, although it receives completely opposite um opposite moods and will receive moods that are not commensurate with the effect that

moscow got in the 14th year when it illegally annexed uh to our uh the crimean peninsula and therefore it rush but i think this is a serious miscalculation by moscow in order to legitimize its presence to help use the mobilized russians to uh in the war yes because uh for well according to their doctrine although they do not pay much attention to their uh laws, but according to their doctrine, they cannot use those mobilized abroad, well, this is how it will be discussed in particular about what is happening now in russia, it is partial, what is called mobilization, and how exactly it happens in our country, there is a plot, let's watch together dying like this

with music, russia stands on their ears, the first mobilization since the second world war is in progress, the main participants of the magic act take the man to the war, the military commissars, strict older men, often with alcohol addiction, tell unconscious recruits what , where, and how do i say my family name, family name, you go to the bus and behind the bus no one is coming out tomorrow morning, these should be carpets, it is not clear to anyone. where in dagestan, although there were some difficulties , the local hot guys did not find out why they are mobilizing while in neighboring chechnya kadyrov seems to have canceled the mobilization of ukraine!

they hit the conscripts, the weakest are weeded out in a natural way, then they are loaded on buses and go to war, that’s all. let’s understand where everything is going, and here at all, the soldiers of islam, one here, one here, as if everything is normal, bus, bus, we’re moving , ukraine, fucking, it’s already quite clear, mobilization, no, no, partial rowing of everyone who served and did not serve, who is not yet 35 and who is already far behind putin lied to dear russians but is this the first time and call for nikuf no, uh, that’s who is called for the gathering, we don’t use anyone and we

’re not going to use them when conducting this military operation, they will be held, and additional reservists and reserves will be mobilized. save lives 55,000 russian soldiers died in this war in six months tens of thousands wounded and crippled you want more no then protest fight run away or surrender ukrainian captivity is an option for you to survive , according to military experts, the first mobilized should appear on the front lines in a month, in 3-4 months, the russian army may be significantly replenished, it will not save russia from defeat, analysts are confident, however, it may

delay the end of the war so that you can thank our colleagues for this extremely informative and meaningful story on a hot topic on a hot topic on the espresso tv channel, an informational and analytical marathon continues for 16 hours and 47 minutes, and we invite taras zoftenko to the conversation. an expert on national security issues is already with us mr. taras good evening good health with us a little bit of the story or not a little bit what are your impressions of how the mobilization process is going on in russia and accordingly what should we expect from it ah well actually from the very beginning from the content of the decree that was made public after the announcement of the russian president's decision about this so-called partial mobilization, it became clear that even uh, well, if it was unmetalized as much as possible so that it could be carried out uh, correct correct systems, yes, the russian state has once again shown that, well

, it and the russian government as a whole are actually very good at doing only three things, that is, kill , lie, and steal. formalized, and from that how certain boundaries were delineated, more precisely , they were not delineated, because well, if the number of e-e mobilized and, accordingly, which categories of citizens of the russian federation were subject to this mobilization, they were not clearly written out from here, it started to slip and, accordingly, this organizational chaos began, even though the minister of defense shogu, when he announced from his side, yes, he commented on this decision about partial mobilization. he also boasted back then, do you remember that every hour there are strategic exercises, and that's why everything has to go well . well, actually, this is also very typical for russia when , uh, on paper, everything is very good for them, but in practice, if only everything was so bad. and actually, we

we can also see organizational dark problems with this mobilization in russia, we see internal political aggravation of certain problems, and on the other hand, we see the kamian quality of those who are mobilized, and those who still manage to be caught, and those who, so to speak , do not stand in the queues, and we pulled them out there is also a report on the border. and actually, we can conclude that , in fact, qualitatively, this mobilization will definitely not save the russian army and will not change the situation at the front regarding the number of e-e, too. you must remember that these 300,000 will not appear on at the front all at once and they will be packed there in waves, and accordingly these will be waves again of different quality and different quantity, well, accordingly, it is necessary to understand that these people are needed in addition to the fact that they should be clothed in at least something yes, they need to be armed somehow, and there will be certain problems here too, so a-a well it is clear that the first thing, of course, we need to prepare is that the number of the russian

army can grow at certain stages, but again the question of quality arises, the question arises of how wisely this demobilized resource can be used and one more big question, will the russian state be able to collect about 300,000, taking into account the outflow of citizens abroad, the number of demobilized people, mr. taras, well, the news, what enemy is doing to the minds of our citizens, that is, putin’s statements due to medvedev’s hyphenation regarding the possible the use of tactical or some other strategic nuclear weapons, of course, they allude to this, but we understand that the risk remains serious, especially considering that in the west, something about this matter alarmed well, all the more so we saw what the russian interventionists resorted to, but the key issue is to use all possible mechanisms of

deterrence and retribution for such. today , the radbezoon is to take place. yes, you are absolutely right, because russia, even using its conventional army, has already crossed all possible red lines. it has violated all possible norms of international law. all possible norms of the functioning of modern international security systems, whatever they may be, but at the global and regional levels, and the only thing that the russians have not yet used is this, actually, this is this, this is nuclear, nuclear weapons. yes, but the weapon itself is such a tool for us which well, it can only benefit another major nuclear power , especially one that claims the status of a superpower, and if it uses the presence of nuclear weapons much more competently, i don't need to remind you about this every week. yes, and in this way well, as they say to be ashamed of the whole world

, and what do they do regularly, with the stubbornness of an idiot, they repeat every month, hint, say that they are not fooling around, but they are done regularly, it can be reminded , yes, here. they have not used and they perfectly understand the consequences of the practical use of this tool , that is, well, to them, and they perfectly understand the consequences of the practical use of this tool, that is, well, to them, and through official channels, and especially unofficially, it is even more effective, and they were shown all the possible consequences of what will happen to russia with the russian regime and with the russian arsenal after the decision to use even tactical nuclear weapons is made and implemented, and these signals are the last sometimes quite harsh , that is, even the security adviser to the president of the united states, jake sullivan, yes, and well, he comments more or less mildly on the issue of russia, yes, and the situation with the

war against ukraine, but even here he is recently reacted rather harshly to all this and it is obvious that the russian leadership was informed of all possible consequences for russia, starting from the fact that russia, well, let's say the means by which they nuclear weapons they will use the plane from which it will be launched, or the mobile missile launcher, yes , or the rocket mine, it was definitely this means of launch , it will be destroyed. the weapon will use the consequences can be further er very different er to the point that russia can in principle get rid of this nuclear arsenal because no country in the world is interested in opening this pandora's box, yes, that is, first we need to get our paws on the russian nuclear cube, so to speak in order to talk about specific effective mechanisms, maybe we should insist on specific solutions

, maybe we should ask the guarantors of the budapest memorandum that they are obliged to apply specific unprecedented steps because it's no longer a joke here. the question is that, ah, actually, the budapest memorandum is, er, in its essence, if you look at the new year as a practical mechanism, it is a little overestimated, because ah, if we talk about the practical steps that are prescribed there there are actually only two of these steps, and the country is the guarantor if there is a threat, including the threat of a nuclear attack on the territory of ukraine . this problem to a certain extent remove or guarantee that this will not happen and the second mechanism that is written there is that the guarantor country promises to bear this problem if it is not possible to solve it at

the level of consultation, so to speak, you actually take this problem to the level of the un the level of the mineral assembly and at the level of the un security council is as paradoxical as it sounds, but from this point of view the budapest memorandum is actually implemented because individual countries guarantee several consultations among themselves and these issues are also thanks to to grant countries, they sound at the highest level in the organization of united emigration, but the problem with these moral ones is that no other practical steps are prescribed there. washington treaty yes, which is the basis for nato, it does not provide for it, there are no clearly prescribed mechanisms and steps that the countries that signed this document must take. well, that is, a different format and a completely different mechanism, but the question is that we see, in principle, collectively, the position of the key countries of the west, the united states, great britain, germany, even

at the level of individual military officials , for example, the command of the rural air force of germany also appears very clearly in the city, the day before, i spoke about this the whole story with nuclear weapons is blackmail. he said that russia will definitely know a strike response to a nuclear one, but the consequences for russia after the possible use of nuclear weapons should be very clear , unambiguous and not reversible, because this is again opens our pandoras for everyone else, and if we do not punish states, uh, not just for violating all possible norms of international law and international security . we perfectly understand that there are other states that have nuclear arsenals that also have the desire and reasons to use them. thank you, mr. taras, for this brilliant analysis on the air of the espresso tv channel. taras zoftenko, an expert on issues of national security worked live on

the espresso tv channel together with anna valevska and antin borkovskii eh, we have news further along the course in a minute, it is a sin not to use it like this, the occupiers are closing mariupol for the forced mobilization of men this is reported by the mayor of mariupol, vadym boychenko literally , we can see from the statistics that if you alone traveled to ukraine somewhere between 80-120 people per day, eight people left mariupol last day, this indicates that mariupol is being closed to the public of the mayor of mariupol, the occupation authorities close the city to a forced police mob of men after the announcement of the results of the fake referendum, he called on men of conscription age to leave mariupol as soon as possible in order not to join the russian army, meanwhile, russia captures more than 600 ukrainian women, including pregnant women and not only more

information will be added by anna eva melnyk and the entire espresso news team, not eva. congratulations, what's in the news? hello, thank you, colleagues, for your continued work the news editor will work, i will tell in particular about the fact that our air forces shot down enemy stormtrooper su-25s, about this not only, stay with us, i will start with the fact that a fatal accident in the mykolaiv region, in the pervomaisky district, a car and a motorcycle collided, the 75-year-old driver of a two-wheeled vehicle died from his injuries on the spot this was reported to the police of the accident area