different missiles, moreover, very expensive to manufacture, and the drones themselves, they did not live up to their actions, they did not live up to the hopes, why? because, well, they actually have the same destruction efficiency and percentage of destruction as the average russian missile before that during the use of these drones, it turned out that a large number of their tactical and technical characteristics are not real, they are unreal, and one of these quirks is that this drone can be used at a distance of 2,000 km 2,500 km no it is already known that the distance of their effective use is 150-170 km, and because they have an inertial guidance system, and it is not accurate, very inaccurate, the greater the distance, the more the accuracy decreases and the very control signal of that drone is lost, and therefore, by the way, they are accompanied from time to time there would

also be iranian ones such as muhajer 6, one of them. last week it was also shot down in the odesa area, and it is even being studied as a trophy by the armed forces of ukraine. it is muhajer 6 that can be used to provide added information to the shaka, well, to direct them all with the instruction to carry out for the paths to 136 that is, the number is actually the problem of these drones. and how many of them are there in russia? here is also a very interesting moment, and because when the first of these drones was disassembled who found out that this is not an old production, it is not some series of enterprises that can produce it serially, some kind of robots do it or something like that, and it was assembled by a-a human labor. this is a black matter er-e artificially a-a artisanal and talk

about that iran may have thousands of such drones no he can’t even have the rank of them, he can have, well, probably hundreds, several hundred. iran would not give all its drones to russia because iran itself is constantly in a state of some kind of confrontation and is frightened by the fact that the usa will attack israel, and in general, it is up to him with everything the world will have to fight, that is, it would not have given its drones to russia, so it can be said that they may have about a hundred of these ways 136 or maybe even less. well, hundreds, it is still a certain threat, okay, let's go now uh, let's talk a little about another such topic - it's actually influence mobilization, we all understand that it was done in russia not only there with some i don't know propaganda in english purpose, there is a real purpose there and here we have one video let's watch it now and then i will ask what i want to ask please show us this

mobilized person who tells us where he is going. hello everyone, on the number of the first tank regiment, they said that there will be no preparation before being sent to the combat zone. regimental commanders confirmed this information on the 29th. we will present the certificate to kherson. therefore, think for yourself, decide for yourself what is next, what to do with it in the future . the russian ipsona, for example, and they say that they are going to kherson, but the fact remains that some new

forces, perhaps not mobilized, perhaps prepared earlier, are already starting to come to the eastern front little by little, and they are pulling them to the south uh, victor, the influence of mobilization in principle, how , what goal can they achieve here, what can we expect , here we were in the last program with other experts, when they spoke, they gave enough, well, such a sober calculation that these people are newly mobilized or whatever they are called they will appear at the front not in 3-4 months, i will not be there, they are, and so then they said that there will be no serious training for a month and these people will already appear at our front in a month, how will this affect it, you can to understand the purpose of such an operation is clear here well, somewhere it seems that the tenth will survive, but yes, degrees and mobiles are actually overloading

their mysticism, which they already have, with their overloads. in principle, it seemed to me that this mobilization is a step, rather, to an administrative one - it is a step aimed at the first thing to issue some offensives, although theoretically, it can help to align one part in order to move and sell others somewhere . rather, it is in order, firstly, to hold their territory, and secondly, to demonstrate that they are ready for the last step and the rear of this retention so that we are not ready to fight to the last that we will no longer retreat and to somehow show the russians and the international community that they are ready on video to the last vets who will attach weapons eh i am not very sure that this will really have any positive military effect so theoretically it is possible it will be permissible to put them. well, it is said that at the front he is experienced, but we

have already seen it on the example of the map. the garrison troops of barsa and others ended in kharkiv oblast. we all know that's why it seems to me, to be honest, that this mobilization in purely military terms in ukraine can be for ukraine's welfare, and it greatly overloaded russian logistics, because it actually throws a large number of zero to the front just raw meat and, in parallel, it causes social tension and economic tension in the federation itself, that's why it's still here. well, it's clear here. they decided to implement it so quickly. maybe they believe the rest to the maximum that the quantity in itself is the quality. and i think that if they immediately go there in this luhansk region, there is a large amount of meat, which in life the automatic machine did not

hold for years, then this will help them. it seems that after all, my trip to mars is often further. it doesn't matter how many people were sitting there in one unfortunate description , whether it was 25 or 250, it's been a year or so here. well, you know , i have some doubts that we would shoot at the trenches with martians. that's all- after all, a little bit irrational to put it mildly, it's a waste, but how can the situation be when they will again try to reproduce this tactic of theirs, which they did before , when they first fired at our trenches and then simply threw in some people who were not even prepared, but some people in order to displace even the bad ones armed, it can still be effective. what do you think, viktor? well, to what extent. it will be very cheap, uh, in such an account, it

was possible to let the buttons to the low ones. i think that the effects this can be extremely negative, moreover, theoretically, i don’t understand where it is sometimes they can do it. yes, they did it there in the thickened mariupol, when mariupol was already surrounded, and only assault actions were needed. where will they do it here ? bakhmut in the zaporizhia region or even in kherson where our troops are now advancing, why not but again, there are a lot of us from mariupol, mariupol in poland is very simple about these surroundings, i could find him bakhmut on the line of the native movement again after all, it will be possible to express the same power structures there, the same actually, well, even inclusively

, it will be said that these people will be there, this is not the situation when it will be possible to simply surround a large city there, surround it there for 100 km along the entire radius because and throw sick meat at him well , anyway, bakhmut, the situation is a little different, although they can try, i just don't really believe that the activists of oleksandr, what do you think about these issues , what is your point of view? the use of this resource, well, it is not expedient exclusively as a support somewhere in the rear, but still in such a number, exactly such a number, partially mobilized in russia, it harms russia itself, because really, every one of these people, well, they are unprepared there, can point out exactly about -e the military aspect, some military elements, but it

is also social, it is also an economic, e-e moment, for example, well, each of these people is one - they are some employees of some enterprise, for example, some company e-e, how much did he earn, for example 50,000 a month on average, yes, he was a tax payer, and now he will no longer be a tax payer, but the country of russia should be, why pay 220,000 a month, that is, four times more. for signing a mobilization contract, this is something else. and this is also a one- time payment, depending on the response of the region, it is from 100,000 to 300,000, that is, to put it mildly, in just a month, i will order each such mobilized person to reserve in the budget from 300 to 500,000 rubles it is without bonuses it is without security it is

not to feed him, to clothe him, but to give him weapons, ammunition, to provide equipment, and all that, and other things that are not in the russian army, then we already see it all, that is, this and such a burden, and in the complex these economic problems, economic burden, social burden, as well as the absence of any the effect of that partial mobilization. and by effective i mean it not only, for example, some offensive actions, the seizure of the territory of ukraine and so on, at least to maintain the positions that they are currently occupying they will not be able to get them even for this resource partially mobilized, then it will simplify, well, what a hare there. for example, in russia itself, what will distract the center of the power structures, which are central not only to the problems of the war in ukraine, but also to internal problems, and that is why it is partially

mobilization yes it's possible for putin - it was his last step to save the situation, but what a lot of his steps, that 's how i liked to say mnogokhodovych in russia, they were mistakes. they were wrong as well, and even this one will not just be a mistake, it will be fatal. well, i have the impression that, in general, all the actions that putin is doing now, and he is doing them in order to uh, well , buy a little more time, well, that is, this is the mobilization to saturate the front at least by someone and er, holding these votes is strange er in the occupied territories er

by the way the whole story now it seems as if after this step the hostilities will somehow change. i’m not saying now, or rather now i’m not saying, then we’ll talk about the issue of nuclear weapons, let’s do it separately, but now they’re telling a little different aspect that after this, the americans will not provide the ukrainian army with satellites intelligence data about these newly occupied territories of russia, because they will now be russian territories, as the russians say. these are fantasies, and secondly, they will literally grab the hands of the ukrainian army and prevent it from advancing further not to let her attack in any way and not to give her weapons of a new attack in order not to cause something there ot victors eh fischak what do you think eh to what extent are these expectations of the russians regarding the change

of hostilities to what extent are they justified at all ? the city has already begun, i don’t know on the basis of what i’m just telling you, here are the legends about russia, russia, some kind of mysticism was taught again about the joining of the whole of ukraine to the russian federation, so that even then a certain united states, the offenders will absolutely say that we are now we help ukraine because it is part of the russian federation, we no longer want it with the russian federation, this reminds me of the appeals of some citizens who sometimes have marine social networks. hello , we just need to cancel the documents on the dissolution of the cadet union, and then legally from the soviet union will be updated, then all the actions actually there of all

independent states in the world there are measures that have become non-legislative very cool very helpful in some way has a measure but the problem is that we do not live in this marichka in the world and how should it affect i do not i know for me it's just a signal for our own russian society, it's just a legal basis for using mobs mobs in the occupied territories and then maybe also conscripts and nothing more. well, they had to throw something, they had to throw themselves a bone lepse would explain why it happened that the invincible second world army in kharkiv oblast was chased for a person with pennies, and this is their answer .

in the head, where they have already defeated everyone well, in principle , it's just uh, it's such a transition to defense already in the media field, let them be the driver over the battle, it will just eventually turn into north korea, which will win the world championship every year. well, despite the fact that the interest in four years ago, there were no problems, but we can expect something new from the russians in connection with their annexation of the occupied territories to russia. well, let's talk about nuclear weapons in the end. let's see how much they said, let's have more let's go to the project and actually, since february 24, i have also constantly heard this question: are nuclear weapons in use because they are a constant threat, they are constantly threatened

every day, someone from the russians threatens from the united states, threatens great britain, ukraine, all our international partners, even mars is threatened with these nuclear weapons but today they have not even , let's say, struck the objects of decision-making, as they can do it all the time. in the end, they can start bombing the territory not with nuclear weapons, but with conventional weapons. in ukraine, for example, they didn’t do this to themselves, no, i mean, somehow there are more guys. and they can generally start killing the territories of ukraine in larger volumes. to bomb, you need to use front-line bombers or strategic bomber planes, for this they need to enter the airspace of ukraine that's all, guests, the answer to the question, because and when even theirs is like that at the very beginning, by the way, we uh, we started with the fact that uh, in the combat zone, uh,

they taught how to destroy planes, uh, russian fighters and attack aircraft, and why is this happening because well, in fact, they are not destroyed due to, for example , air defense, it is destroyed on the line of contact in the combat zone due to manpads calculations a-a therefore, this is exactly the effect of manpads and if these planes entered the air fully air - the air defense of ukraine is fully operational, they were destroyed by dozens . in fact, this was at the very beginning of the full-scale invasion of ukraine, only then our air defense area was distracted by the number of other objects such as uavs and such as, in addition to aircraft, helicopters, missile weapons and so on, and in order to carry out a massive bombardment, it is necessary to find an

object that needs to be bombed. it may look like they can, for example, launch a hundred bombers at the same time, i don’t know, uav missiles at once and try, well, a dozen will fly to kyiv , that’s enough to drop, for example, against a bunker, bunker bombs, are hundreds big or not enough ? at the same time, they will launch a bomber, they do n't have such a resource, they don't have such a resource today to carry out such an operation, and they will say more in them today , uh, the situation is such that, in fact, even every bomber is worth its weight in gold a- for example, we can see how many su-34s were destroyed in ukraine, and a dozen of them for more than 10 years, almost 20 years, saturated the potential of the so-called air and space forces of the russian

federation, we are bombers, and in fact, more of them have already been destroyed in ukraine, it was in incomplete months at that time, it is already the seventh month, and therefore it is a big risk that they will not take because this is the last bomb they have left, this will be the last blow, listen, it will be the last blow let's sort of arrange something like the bombing of dresden there, they can be the task of london or they will be left without aviation. what is the point, they understand it themselves, the paradox of the situation is that today they even have aviation missiles such as the hp-59, which you cannot produce on their own, even they are in short supply because they cannot produce them in the quantity they need precisely on the scale of a full-scale war

so that they can launch a huge number of bars every day with these very rockets they produce piecemeal, on the other hand they have a large number really huge number of bombs of various nomenclature, but they will not be able to use them, they look at them in warehouses and storage centers and they look there and uh only regret that they do not they can use them because it is necessary to enter the airspace in ukraine, they are currently afraid of our airspace because our air defense is operating here viktor eh, we can expect that the west, in the face of threats and nuclear and non-nuclear bombing, will somehow react a little more than it reacted until this moment for everything else when there well let's deliver something there in five months it will arrive well because to get two

for a male or how much just now well it's funny yes after six months of bombing there to me it seems that you will be very much yours here, even playing in a neutral position. because when a country starts a nuclear war, you are almost always a person who can be not simply, but conventionally speaking, a chamberlain, but a person who, by his position, led to this nuclear war, so it seems to me that after after the transition to er tactics of terror to mass mobilizations to a war of demand er, well, it will be difficult to be pro-russian in europe, even for those parties in which russia er for a long time and effectively financed the work again sooner

on the internal audience more and the external and again actions from uh, well, or about it, it's just the last argument that remains if well, if and when the ukrainians will start to effectively beat these mobsters and go there and effectively drink and enter the territory of poland i has already voted hers, confirming the thesis that russia's borders end where russia gets scratched, which means that they can remain and in the moscow region , in this situation, only nuclear blackmail and threats of using tactical nuclear weapons will remain, and everyone understands what else putin's option is no longer there because his weakness is absolutely limited, it is already obvious to anyone outside of russia, it should be obvious to people inside the country. well, look, viktor. and if this is

so , isn't it just some kind of... a factor in order to provoke some kind of negotiations in which russia would try to secure these things in the capture of the territory now or how much of this you have literally one and a half minutes how much of this the script can be viewed as a progression in its liberation of the territory, i do not see that ukraine is going to, even if russia theoretically succeeds in convincing the west, because there well, let's not call ukrainian troops, for example, in the same luhansk

region . there will be no events if you ukrainian troops will go forward effectively, the west will help them because there will be no escalation anyway , oleksandr ave. what do you think, i will try to get something from the west to what extent can it work? and in general, what can it lead to, what will it not work? because our international partners, as well as we, understand very well that if putin even goes for something similar, then it will only be a complete destruction . of russia itself, and not so much in a military sense, but in a political, er, economic , even social sense, moreover, it may be the end of putin himself, besides, there are a large number of other aspects that say that this weapon will not be used, that's all - there were only this is really an attempt to somehow force ukraine to negotiate with its international partners. but we have already

seen, not for the first time, how putin is trying to imitate these threats, especially with nuclear weapons, in order to achieve some of his local or geopolitical goals, well, not once worked precisely in favor of moscow, so it will be and now thank you, it was viktor tregubov and oleksandr kovalenko, the main thing for us now is actually not putin's threats, but how quickly the world will understand that the ultimate goal is not to stop russia, but still defeat russia well, as soon as this opinion is firmly established, regardless of everything, then there will be a complete victory in the rest. thank you. see you in a week. see espresso. we are looking for

three missing children from the family of our own two brothers, dmytro and artem, and their sister, sofia, about the disappearance the children's aunt told me that she is the one in the photo with her children. olena has been living in spain for 10 years, but regularly keeps in touch with her brother and nephews. the woman said that her relatives lived in a nine-story building in the city of mariupol at 61 kurchatov street and the last time we got in touch was the day before the start of a full-scale war, we spoke for the last time on february 23 and i don't know what happened to them at all i'm looking for viber and telegram i don't know i don't know where to find them imagine already for about seven months, ms. olena has not known anything about the fate of her family, so she is asking for help to find her relatives. this is her brother serhiy vlasov

with his sons artem on dmytro. back in 2014, little sofia was only two years old then and she suffered the loss of her mother very hard because of this, she still has certain psychological disorders and problems with development, the girl speaks very poorly, moms, i think she cries, i can’t , sofia looks 10 years old now, and her brothers artem and dmytro, 12 and 14 years old, on the left in the photo in a green t-shirt - this is artem, and in the middle is dmytro in a gray sweater. let me remind you that the vlasov family lived in mariupol at 61 kurchatova street. the bombing, the father was hiding in the basement with the children, or somewhere in a bomb shelter, and now maybe he has moved somewhere, while in spain, mrs. olena

somehow miraculously found out and even managed to get in touch with her acquaintance in mariupol. this woman said that she saw the children intact and unharmed at the beginning of may and i am a friend, she worked with them, this is their teacher, when i talked to her and found yona, she says that we have no connection, don’t forget, they say nothing. their video in mine and all some bus and all. so, my friend elena from mariupol saw artem and dmytro and sofiyka. at the beginning of may, the children were put on some bus. but where he went is currently unknown and no, we do not know. my friend does not know for sure either. we don't know where he is, what he is, i don't know what can happen, tiny little ones, i'm not

worried about the children. i understand that ukrainian tv channels are not broadcasting in mariupol at the moment, and maybe someone from the local area sees this program on social networks , so i'm asking if anyone knows where they could be taken children, or has anyone seen sofia, dmytro and artem, or their father, serhiy vlasov, do not delay and call us on the hotline of the magnolia child tracing service at the short number 116,000,000. calls from any mobile operator are free of charge, or write to us in the chatbot of the tracing service children in telegram, i have another story of the disappearance of a child, also in mariupol, this is 14-year-old viktor hudozhev, the last time the boy contacted me was on the first of april, then he stayed in the city, the situation there has been very tense since then it has passed it's been almost six months, but there was no more news about the child. if suddenly someone saw viktor khudoshin, does he know where he can