friends of the woman, i am not worried about the children. i understand that ukrainian tv channels are not broadcasting in mariupol now. maybe someone from the local area sees this program on social networks, so i am asking. if anyone knows where they could have taken the children, or if anyone has seen sofia, dmytro and artem, or their father, serhiy vlasov , please let me know. delay and call us on the hotline of the magnolia child tracing service at the short number 116 000 000 calls from any mobile operator are free or write to us at the chatbot of the child tracing service in telegram i have another the story of the disappearance of a child also in mariupol, this is 14-year-old viktor khudoshyn, the last time the boy made contact was on the first of april, then he stayed in the city, the situation there was very tense since then . almost six months have passed, but there was no more news about the child. if suddenly has anyone seen victor khudoshin? does anyone know where he might be

now? urgently dial the short number of the magnolia children's search service from any mobile operator , 116,000,000. calls to the hotline are free, or write to the chat bot of the search service. children in the telegram, any information is important, see this week in the program of collaborators a list of miklunks "."

glory to ukraine is a program verdict my name is serhiy rudenko good day and good health to all today 217 days of heroic ukrainian resistance to the russian occupiers moscow is happy with the pseudo-referendum for the annexation of the occupied territories of ukraine to russia and is waiting for its legalization in the russian state duma zelensky says that these results of the pseudo-referendum were drawn in the kremlin and therefore the ukrainian state in case the kremlin will legalize these pseudoretats will not hold

talks with vladimir putin meanwhile british intelligence reports that ukraine is stepping up its offensive russia is strengthening its defense russians continue to lose manpower and equipment in ukraine as of the morning of september 28 russia has lost 58,150 people in ukraine since the start of the great russian war ukraine has already lost 2,312 tanks, 4,889 armored fighting vehicles, 1,381 artillery systems, 331 multiple rocket launchers, 175 air defense systems, 262 aircraft, 224 helicopters, 3,742 units of automobile equipment, 15 ships, boats, 241 cruise missiles, 989 drones, 131 units of special equipment, the enemy suffered the most losses in the directions of kramatorsk and donetsk. so, the referendum painted by moscow,

merkel asks not to annoy putin, and mobs from the russian federation are already at the front, we will talk about this in the next section hours with us in touch oleksandr musienko director of the center of military legal studies mr. oleksandr good day good health to you thank you for participating in i welcome you to our program, therefore, moscow announced that the pseudo-referendum on the occupied territories of the ukrainian state was successful, they drew up to 100% of those who want to join russia, the figure fluctuates, if i'm not mistaken, from 94 to 90 seven percent. well, what can they be? the percentages that can be a referendum during the war. well, under the barrel of a machine gun, and of course, what can be the calculations, taking into account the fact

that these numbers, as volodymyr zelenskyi correctly stated, were simply drawn by the kremlin, by the way, yesterday the un security council considered the issue of conducting these pseudo-referendums on ukrainian territory at the request of the ukrainian state, and let's hear who said zelensky speaking virtually at the organization of the united nations at the general assembly of russia's recognition of these pseudo-referendums as supposedly normal implementation of the so-called crimean scenario and another attempt to annex the ukrainian territory will mean that there is nothing to talk about with this president of russia. annexation is such a step that puts him alone against

all humanity. is needed from every country in the world, do i believe in your ability to act, do you, alexander, believe in the ability of the un security council to put putin in his place in the matter of the possible annexation of the occupied regions of donetsk and luhansk, kherson and zaporizhzhia regions, the security council of course no , as long as russia is there and as long as it has a legal right, then of course they cannot make any decisions , moreover, you know, i will tell you that even the council of ministers itself consulted with russia, even when they made some decisions, for example, regarding sanctions against iran i didn't guarantee that russia would comply with them, because it's an interesting thing, i'll just make a digression so that it's clear what's up with the security council. and i want to remind you that since the mid-2000s,

sanctions have been introduced against iran by a un security council resolution, which russia also voted for then but in principle , this did not interfere with anything, as later it turned out that russia was sending arms to iran in order to circumvent the same sanctions that she herself voted for from the highest platform of the security council, and it remained practically irresponsible even then, as we see perhaps if russia had already been brought to justice and harshly brought to justice, there would not have been the consequences of the catastrophic changes that fueled russia. what is important in general? here are a few messages that resonated in the context. the first is that at the general assembly meeting it was said that if russia cannot to be legitimate, especially for ukraine, which is participating in the war, this is an unequivocal position

from the head of the european council that russia should at least suspend its membership in the un security council, these are quite important things that were not previously i am convinced that russia must be excluded from betraying the un security council. there are ways to do this . i do not support the opinion of those experts who begin to say that it is impossible to do. perhaps only political will is needed. legal points can be observed, and the second point from the speech of the president of ukraine there in addition to all that, he said an important and relevant thing, how i think that russia will need to get rid of nuclear weapons, this is the first time at such a level on a high platform , this is the position and i understand that this position, it will acquire its development because in the context of russia's threats of nuclear weapons in the context of nuclear terrorism, of course we should

strive for this. it is not necessary well, of course, of course, putin is trying to somehow justify this pseudo-referendum. yesterday he held a meeting about the collection . pseudo-referendums are held, let's hear putin, of course , today, in the conditions of conducting a special military operation, not y-y, and referendums uh-uh in donbass for the salvation of people in all territories, namely the salvation of people in all territories where this referendum is held, all this uh- uh is in the corner of the corner it is the center of attention of our entire

society of the entire country, this is natural because it is connected with dramatic events, but it is a well -known simple and fundamental law that is contained in a very simple well-known phrase so , russia came to our territory, destroyed our cities and villages, killed people, now he is talking about the fact that we first think about people, but taking into account, alexander, that and this idea of ​​pseudo-referendums, which they carried out for a long time and then hesitated for a long time when will it be held there or on september 11 on the day of the single vote in the russian federation? or later and then suddenly in three days they just made these pseudo-referendums, drew these numbers and announced the mobilization at the same time, doesn’t it look like this ?

in such a way that now putin is us, and with the results of the pseudo-referendum, he will blackmail both ukraine and the whole world, and there will be no such a quick annexation of these territories or a vote for the annexation of these territories to the russian federation, in order to, in principle, keep them in limbo and entering ukraine, i will say literally two words about what putin said. well , first of all, he continues to talk about the so-called special military operation . fact even in general mobilization and not partly because there they lied in the next one because now they are taking a large number of people and there in russia well, to call it a special military operation well,

it doesn't stand up to anything at all, they can't even say that it's actually e- eh, the war and the second eh, but where are all the farmers who wanted so much to collect bread and help people, he says that everyone in russia is interested in this, especially those who ran to storm the borders to georgia, kazakhstan and finland, mongolia, other countries, it is quite obvious who is interested in this this is an indicator. by the way, now there are two scenarios regarding the so-called referendums. i think one of them is less likely, the second is more likely, i still think that the tendency to connect the probable that putin will try to complete the annexation of these territories as soon as possible, that is, everything - do you understand what the situation is, the situation is that the russian troops are now retreating mainly along the front line, especially in the east, we can see it. yes , where and this continues. accordingly, we

understand that and how to blackmail filkina with a letter some kind of fact that a pseudo-referendum was held there, which no one in the world recognizes, so i think that in order to consolidate his blackmail, in particular, he will certainly do everything to speed up the annexation of these territories through the relevant decisions of the meetings of the duma of the federal assembly and so on a-a for us this does not change anything in any way, it is clear that we and the entire civilized world do not recognize these consequences and the position is clear , it has been voiced that the de-occupation of ukrainian territories will continue regardless of any russian plans, but the fact that putin will use it with threats, in particular, of nuclear weapons, and to send these signals of the west to the europeans. i would even say not that there is a united state,

but that the eu countries are separate, first of all, so that they are more and more within their own countries raised the mood that it might be necessary to somehow sit down with putin and negotiate. i think so, but the scenario is that he will be in a state of limbo, keeping these territories until the moment there, threatening annexation. i think that he is still less here in this situation the alleged speaker of the state duma of the russian federation, volodan, said that voting in the so -called referendums saves people from genocide and that the tasks of a special military operation will be fulfilled .

we will reunite because of the dance justice that happened more than 30 years ago must be a correct task special military operations must be achieved we on our part must делать всё для еготов volodya said that the injustice that happened 30 years ago must be corrected, that is, he considers it unfair that ukraine gained independence, that the soviet union collapsed, well, if you follow his logic, then the injustice was there in the 45th year or so during the first world war and at any time when the structure of the world actually changed, but in this situation it is interesting what the reaction of the world in general will be, because everyone says that we will not recognize this, well, the world actually does not recognize and

the annexation of crimea, and it is clear that then it happened under different conditions, now vladimir putin, who has been faithfully pointed out, threatens nuclear weapons, although nuclear weapons from the very beginning were used as a weapon of deterrence , and not as a weapon that would need to be attacked there he concept of the kremlin is quite simple, they legalize these pseudo-referendums, the results of these territories join the russian federation, and then it is not a special military operation there , counter-terrorist, or how they conducted counter-terrorist operations there in chechnya, or in general, there is already a war in russia, ukraine, because ukraine wants to take away the russian territories in quotation marks, the russian territories have fled. look at this development of events, because this is not the constant reminders of the

same ridiculous deputy chairman of the security council of the russian federation, dmitry medvedev, about nuclear weapons, it just looks yes, it's funny that some half-alcoholic and half -politician is trying to say something, the former president of russia is trying to say something, but his mouth is expressing real plans that can be implemented by the same putin or will putin dare to use nuclear weapons after these occupied regions gain status in the russian state duma, first of all, yes, with irony, you know, half politician and half president, i agree here, i disagree, only half alcoholic, i think without half yes, but as for the situation in general, you you know, listening to volodin about this injustice, they would n't play with history so much, because they have

the impression that they read only those sections that are interesting to them and miss a lot of things, and that's actually you know, this leads them to fatal mistakes, to which they bring themselves putin and his entire regime, why do i? for example, if we are already talking about history, the situation with a large mobilization in russia gives way to the first world war and the consequences with which it ended for the russian empire at that time, the positions mobilized as a result came back and what they did. i think everyone remembers this from history from 1917-18 years ago. let them not yet talk about justice or injustice because they still may face quite devastating consequences for themselves as far as nuclear weapons are concerned, the situation is as follows, i think that in this context we should proceed not simply from whether putin can tactically use nuclear weapons, but

from the fact that how to act in the event that he will decide to do it and here it is necessary, here it is already further, the logic of events leads us to the next , first of all, as a rule, the strikes of tactical nuclear weapons, their strikes are preceded by training with the determination of the goals of the position of the carriers of these weapons, which can in the end, in the warhead itself , russia conducted such exercises in previous years exclusively in kaliningrad, or well, or together with belarus, but here is the peculiarity that in kaliningrad, the preliminary training in the use of nuclear weapons was done so long ago, in may of this year, they took place the authoritative german publication spiegel also wrote about this. there is another thing: where can russia not store tactical nuclear weapons, because we understand that you need a special

temperature storage regime, etc., and so on, the only object is in the occupied part of ukraine it is possible to do this, this is crimea, from where there were signals that there might be nuclear weapons, that on the eve of a full-scale invasion there is also a facility in feodosiya 13, which, according to information from various sources, russia began to restore in 2015, respectively, what does this mean for us and by the way, please note that general hodge previously said that it would be necessary to destroy the bases in the crimea, the russian black man , and general wesley clark is also a respectable person who, back in march-april, said that we should be are ready to destroy objects in crimea and the kaliningrad region, and even the ambassador of the united states to ukraine maria ivanovych e.e. this week in an interview with voice of america noted that ukraine should be given long-range

weapons that would make it possible to destroy objects the russian military, in particular in the occupied crimea, what does this mean, does this mean that ukraine must have the capabilities for prevention and preventive functions in order to prevent russia from using tactical nuclear weapons or to minimize any consequences of such use, in what way first this is what a weapon should be in order to be able to destroy the objects and military depots of the enemy, in particular in the occupied crimea. and about this and the second - these are anti-aircraft defenses that make it possible to hit these two directions tracks - this is the help of our partners introduced observations intelligence and constant information support regarding the movement of e-e russian nuclear weapons, potential carriers, how they can use all weapons, and so on. this is what

needs to be worked on and what needs to be strengthened, because you understand, i am not like that, i am not inclined to believe that putin is 100% blocking. i see this obsession with the neo-imperial idea of ​​war. and i think that only unity, consolidation of the west around the support of ukraine and the sending of clear signals to the kremlin that the consequences, as the president of the us presidential administration said, will be catastrophic, and this can be the best deterrent, because the risks of using such weapons can be rejected 100%. i think it is impossible . says that in the event that this nuclear balance in the world is disturbed when there are five states of the old states that have nuclear weapons, what

were these nuclear weapons as a deterrent weapon if suddenly russia releases this genie from the bottle, then such after that, there will be 20 countries in the world and there will be no transfers, including the russian federation , because it will also be under attack. what do you think , did washington give enough warnings in private conversations with moscow in order to prevent a nuclear strike? of the russian army the territory of ukraine well, you know, i admit that there were really a lot of such private conversations because the issue is serious and i think that through the relevant channels, which are non-public, information was also transmitted when the consequences were destroyed. well,

besides, in addition to such warnings and signals, enough it is important to demonstrate with your actions, with your actions , readiness for possible actions in response, this is one of the indicators, remember lukashenko complained about the fact that nato planes fly there around belarus, around kaliningrad and so on well, of course they will fly because they also demonstrate their readiness to take action in the event of something and also conduct intelligence because russia threatens with nuclear weapons or, for example, statements or with clear messages like this, even as general hodges did, where there are uh-e possible actions that could be applied they are also important well, you know, sometimes it is not even necessary to specify what can be done, but to do it in such a way that this signal is received by the enemy, so that he understands that it

can be done. that's what i mean, i i will make an analogy, remember in march, we all had a premonition of a terrible threat that russia could use another chemical weapon of mass destruction, and then there was a meeting of nato in brussels, and the president of the united states came there, and he made a clear message that if russia er uses such a weapon, she will face devastating consequences for herself well, we see that, in principle, this threat was averted, er, and this weapon was not used, there were some signals that it could have been used, that some remnants were found somewhere, but this did not lead to the death of the civilian population to serious consequences, and i think that even now it is sometimes possible to communicate in such a way that it is understandable

. here are similar statements from perhaps president biden or his administration, as he did regarding taiwan, or is there a clear and understandable statement that the united states will defend taiwan , or such a statement as made by the chinese head of the 7 ringing bells regarding kazakhstan that china will defend kazakhstan is roughly like this, it seems to me that it is also a clear message that gives a lot to understand, especially if earlier the usa or nato avoided any attempts there. they are now emerging to be called a party to the conflict. so what is the point of avoiding if putin has long ago called them a party to the conflict they are fighting for their version with a collective institution from nato. what is there to be afraid of in such a case?

can use western weapons in the regions where the russian federation held so-called referendums, the united states is not against ukraine using such weapons and hm what did he say we so many other states were already clear and many other states were already clear we do not recognize and not really we will never recognize the annexation of ukrainian territories by russia, ukraine has the absolute right to defend itself on its territory, in particular, to take back territory that was illegally seized by russia, including in a different way, and including thanks to those weapons what is now coming to ukraine is the united states , which is preparing another package of military financial aid for ukraine, or will it save the current situation, because it is clear that the mobilization of one

million russians is ahead. obviously, roughly speaking, dead bodies are lying in the kherson, donetsk, luhansk , and zaporizhzhia regions, they are just bodies there, and they will not make barricades or walls with them . in this situation, according to you, the tactics of the ukrainian state regarding reconquest territories, and i think that in principle the plans that were implemented by our command, i think that they will be implemented in the future, what we will get to understand is what else is the question, the question is that war is already the language of physical support and it is the language of resources for today ukrainian tel looks more reliable than the russian one , and it is obvious. well, why? well, because we have financial support, there is support for weapons. the russian military-industrial complex, with all its

efforts, does not cope with the tasks that in front of them, accordingly, our advantage with the help of our partners in the range of weapons in e, let's say not in range, but in technology, in its efficiency, in the destructiveness of strikes on enemy bases, in the ability to use effectively all of the western weapons that are supplied to us and continue to be supplied to us plus , to top it all, we can say that our actions, which were demonstrated and we all saw in such counteroffensive operations, which, as in the kharkiv region , testify to how effectively it is possible to approach the planning of the organization of the execution of these tasks, which concerns fundamentally how it should change, i do not think that it will establish any fundamental changes, it is of course more at the discretion of

our command, which makes the appropriate decisions , but what i think that in the end, just whatever they are covered with bodies by people and so on , it seems to me that this will only lead to greater demoralization of the russian troops and russian forces and to the disruption of the mobilization processes in russia. well, because if before this we saw cases when it seemed or fled under the pressure of the ukrainian troops, then the people who go to the prepared and it is obvious that they neglect their training there and literally a few days after the draft, they went to the mobilization, they are immediately abandoned. well, in the kharkiv region yesterday, a mobilized person was detained from near moscow, who said that he was mobilized on september 21 and he was already there in less than a week in kharkiv oblast. that is, this is evidence that the quality of the training of these people will be