west and ending with the east, and against the background of this introduction of regular troops on the territory of ukraine, what did he count on, that the ukrainians would be frightened, start to fear and start to run away? well, i think the best thing is that he counted on the fact that the ukrainians would simply surrender to him and meet him there with bread and salt. i think that when today the conversation is about a nuclear attack, it is also a calculation that the ukrainians should be psychologically destabilized and react in a completely different way than we are reacting now, because what stopped putin in ukraine the armed forces of ukraine. the unity of society and the support of the western world. it is very important for us today not to scare ourselves and not to start fearing when there is no need to do anything about it,

because can putin use tactical nuclear weapons? prescribed as one of the options , it is clear that he will not do it tonight, tomorrow, or the day after tomorrow, why, because he also has to justify the logic in steps, the first thing he will do is complete this fake on south-eastern ukrainian lands and joining them to the russian federation. after that, what he will do is, of course, he will use the offensive of his additional forces, this cannon fodder that he collected throughout the territory of muscovy, which he will release again into the territory of ukraine. because he needs to explain why a nuclear attack in including to explain for brainiacs that it is not the usual weapon that he is flaunting today, but after that, of course, he has a developed plan for the use of tactical nuclear weapons, that is why in this story i think that we really need to listen to our

foreign partners, because in fact, on the eve of february 24, we already had the opportunity today to compare who said what, who assured what, and who proposed what steps to take, so if today the western world says in this regard that we must prepare and be ready, then we must prepare and be ready or should be afraid definitely no do you need to panic 100% no but be ready and understand what to do in such a situation because what do people want now people want answers to two questions first the question of who to listen to because there are now plenty of experts around every corner and secondly after that who to listen to what to do and every person should know exactly what to do just as every person should know what to do when there is a threat of a missile attack as well every person should to know what to do when there is a threat

of using tactical nuclear weapons, these are two things that are important today and that the government should do, because this is guessing now and bringing the conversation to a level, but belarus will attack, they will not to attack, and it seems that lukashenko gave a very clear answer, he did putin a favor, he went to the occupied territories of georgia, which allegedly legitimized this occupation by russia. i think that this favor of lukashenko will definitely be enough to start again for a month or two. that 's how you know his wavering position so that and to please putin . well, the hague does not deserve more than he has today, because what we have to do today is give an answer to this fake action that the muscovites call a referendum, the first thing is the counteroffensive of the armed forces of ukraine, the further and

deeper we go into our territory already today , the easier it will be for us tomorrow, and we must do it with all our might, so we and other people's deputies from european solidarity were this weekend in kharkiv and in the kharkiv region up to the moscow border in cossack lopan is literally a kilometer from our border with the muscovites. in fact, a very, very important action took place there . first, some of the collaborators escaped with the moscow troops, and those people who left without gas, without electricity, very often without telephone connection, you know that the first thing they say is that everyone who betrayed ukraine has no right to be in ukraine, and law enforcement agencies and the state should definitely deal with this, but the second thing they know is that they will never agree to a repeated moscow occupation because they felt that it really is such, what atrocities are these, what dangers they are, and therefore we should be

calm that this territory is definitely already 100% pro-ukrainian and the further the armed forces of ukraine go, the more such pro-ukrainian territory there is there will be a second what needs to be done well, let's do more and more in order to connect with the western world, i did not ask the secretary of the national security and defense council about nato for nothing . actions and when we start these attempts in the parliament to bury nabu or some other things, this is not to the benefit of our cooperation with western partners, and from them we have more sanctions and more help, and when today poroshenko went to sweden in order to choose to participate in the non-peak conference is in order for us to receive more help from the west, the third thing that needs to be done is to raise questions in the international

world community about the isolation of russia at the level of the general assembly of the united nations and the deprivation of its right of veto because there is china , and it is definitely a nuclear player that russia is paying attention to, and today this nuclear player must be neutralized, that is, it is clear what needs to be done . first of all, we must tell people the truth, prepare people to different circumstances and different turns of events and secondly, act, act, not talk. i am convinced that victory will be ours. but this is important, and mykhailo tsimbalyuk also mentioned this to oleksiy of the secretariat of the nsdc, actually about the fact that we need this instruction for people what to do in the event of a nuclear threat, i still want this instruction to come from the nsdc and not just from the media, because the media really write a lot about it, they are looking for different experts, we ourselves

always think about who to invite to talk about this is to talk in order to explain something to people, i have to say that we are now watched online on youtube by almost 11,000 people, these are big numbers for our youtube channel, the great lviv speaks. we thank you for being with us, this means that everything we say in this studios, this dynamic that is here suits our audience. they listen to you, so pay attention to this, and we ask the audience to like who hasn't liked them yet, and this broadcast will become even more popular on youtube materials. he very clearly said that if there is a tactical nuclear strike, it means that the diameter of the lesion is 1.5 km, 3 km and there is nothing 10 km from the epicenter, throw everything here and go somewhere, the road is on it. i am interested in another, you understand , the minister of defense asked himself a different question today. and what is the state of the nuclear arsenal of the russian federation when it is the last it was

tested once. there are many missiles that need to be disposed of a long time ago, because he allegedly had a conversation there with the second president of ukraine, kuchma, who said why we gave out, explaining why we gave out nuclear weapons, because even so the service life this adrenalin weapon is produced in 97 onwards. it had to be disposed of. i will give you an example of what happened to the most one of the biggest disasters with rockets in the soviet union was in the 60th year at boikonur. a missile at boikonur broke during the tests of r16 this was the biggest tragedy for the generals and many died more than 100%, led by the commander-in-chief of the missile forces of the soviet union, marshall, who was burned alive on sunday. the question is when they will try to press the button where this missile will fly or take off and pure, wouldn’t it be a tragedy first of all for russia itself to launch a small tactical nuclear weapon . but it seems to me that the minister of defense of ukraine

is more concerned with the approach. will fly out, then the minister of defense must ensure the state defense order and not tell what is happening in russia he is the minister of defense of ukraine mykola knyazhytskyi, the minister of defense must react faster to the defense order because then it will be too late to produce anything, i am so very interested in listening to everything that we are going up to him today, i will try to say a few of my theses, again, my personal opinion does not claim to be any kind of expertise , but yes, lukashenko, er, in my opinion, he is trying to take pugacheva's position as a tourer i am sure that he receives some additional fees for this, now there are meetings on these things, which someone

perceives as a serious authority who came to abkhazia and everything. now all countries have recognized this republic. yes, no, no one is serious about this he absolutely does not understand whether he still has any serious business, he has already given everything, he sold everything, he sold the country, he sold his people, he does not value his people at all, and the only hope is, in fact, for a faster, well-qualified, healthy military leadership of belarus. what is it? it seems to me that all the time he is being held back from even bigger stupid things that he has already done regarding belarus and the possibility of an attack. i think that this is again not the opinion of a military expert. but we are all talking about the fact that all moments, in fact, winter can freeze these swamps, this can be an additional opportunity for passage, but i want to believe that in fact our forces

are very large there. i do not believe that in fact the belarusian troops, as a contingent made of belarusians, will go to the volyn region of polissia, and the russian troops will easily and actually they are preparing there right now , this is evidenced by intelligence data on the number of people who are ready to feed already on the territory of belarus, an important point, a second short thing, ah, about the south, ah, to someone, probably, it is not much like it in my opinion now for all this time and listening to the goals expressed by various military experts during the last few years on the moon. it seems to me that putin has practically achieved his goal at the moment in relation to ukraine. he now holds the southern part, he cut us off from the sea, he did not cut us off from fortunately for odesa, our troops coped with this, but if he

had done it, he would have connected it with transnistria. he would probably have dared to go a little further somewhere in moldova and then try to make a big ring in ukraine, this is my personal opinion . - and far from large-caliber firearms that can destroy russian troops far from the front line, this is what we need, first of all, even more aviation. threats that may suddenly fly in our direction, i still agree with the opinion of experts mr. danilov and others that a may not take off, may not

arrive and you may fail on the territory of russia itself, that is why it seems to me that the russians understand the high unpreparedness of the russian highly unqualified troops are fleeing the territory of russia because they understand that they will not win and because they understand that the production of black bags is now flourishing and therefore for them this is the only way and a few more things at the end of the referendum well, it seems to me globally , nothing will change for us after the invasion of crimea in 14th year, even if they recognize the day after tomorrow, vote and say that they will not change anything for us, we will still clean it up on our territory, i agree that this is a job for the internal russian electorate and not more, not less, therefore, we will continue to defend it, but there are two more things i would like to

say about, uh, we are here about the nuclear threat, and it is worth mentioning the landing, which is a thing of winter in liberated cities where people have nothing to warm themselves and now we have to take care of them, resettle them in those places where there are heating systems where they can live in calm and safe places where children can study when you go to school in kindergarten and so on and maybe even they provide some kind of work, but about children finally, i would like to touch on one more topic, i don't see why, and for some reason they are not actively discussing something. i want to draw the attention of the prime minister of ukraine. i want to draw the attention of the minister of defense, the minister of

education, everyone on whom it depends. we cannot take them to fight. we cannot train them here. they spent a lot of their time. maybe even money if they paid for this training. did they receive a grant? and we can now in the long term lose the war of brains by not giving them the opportunity to study abroad and travel to work here in ukraine ukrainian students, there may be up to three thousand maximum who can study abroad we should let them go there so that they can study and come further to rebuild and build the ukrainian economy, we include mykola knyazhytskyi in our conversation today, many opinions were expressed well, we heard military experts, we heard danilov, and we understand that on the one hand, the possibility of using

tactical nuclear weapons in the russian federation exists, on the other hand, there are serious there is no hope of hope in this regard, but one way or another, there is a clear understanding that this possibility must be considered and prepared for, so what do you make of it what do you think about the reason and how ukrainians in different regions should prepare for the fact that putin can use nuclear weapons by god's will and such, well, look, he's a maniac, he's not crazy, we always have a question: if he wants to, when did he start this war this year, they told him about it on the air 100 years in the soviet union just at the end of the year, and now he wants to restore this soviet union, you mentioned it here, i connected already in the middle of the conversation, i didn't hear everyone's er replicas of thoughts, but i heard that they mentioned lukashenka, who seems to have arrived, he knows that it is about lukashenka, they were talking about abkhazia

, so lukashenko was in abkhazia, and he was in abkhazia for a reason hmmm, it is obvious that the soviet union in putin's eyes is russia, belarus, possibly the occupied territories of georgia and the occupied territories of ukraine, which he wants to call it ukraine, that is, it is important for him to say that ukraine joined this in one form or another, by becoming part of russia or in some other way, and in fact for this they need to blackmail us, he raises the stakes, he wants to admit these territories in order to later, well, so to speak , establish his rule there for a certain time, so that from those territories he can continue to attack us , and after a certain respite, for this he needs to stimulate us and the whole world to victory. what way can he stimulate us to use nuclear weapons - this is just a stimulus for negotiations, but obviously when we talk about tactical nuclear weapons, we must understand that they are certainly powerful , but not too powerful, and when we were told that they

can be used to strike at ukrainian troops at the front and in the so-called decision-making centers. i think that this is similar to the truth, so it is really possible to use it in order to allegedly go to further negotiations or to force ukraine to further negotiations, so even the use of tactical nuclear weapons, from my point of view, is all the same, there is an element of blackmail, including its use, which will bring many victims, but it is not a strategic nuclear weapon . it is obvious that uh, i read analytics on cnn where they say that tactical nuclear weapons have a flight range of uh, 500 km and that they are located in russia, never on the border, if the russians will move it to the border, then u.s. special services and others on the special services of our allies - it will be noticed and we will at least know about it in advance. if it is true or not

, it is difficult for me to judge, this is a war and we usually believe the markings of the western countries of our allies. conversations lukashenka, who you remember, said all the time that allegedly in order to protect them from the poles, he was ready to deploy nuclear weapons on his territory, but he raised this issue several times. and this was just part of the negotiations with the russians so that the victims of the territory of belarus could was implemented in kyiv or in lviv or some other ukrainian city that is further from the russian border and you can’t get there 500 km away. therefore, it is obvious that the use of nuclear weapons is possible, just as it is obvious that the west is now doing everything for that to stop putin and that their response will be proportional, so to speak, although not necessarily nuclear, they openly talk about it and that they will do everything possible in order to prevent this from happening

, but so far it looks like putin actually wants to create two ukraines, one one , one, one, one, one, one, one, one, one, one, one, one, one, one, one, one, one, one, one, one, one, one, one, one, one, one, one, one, one, one, one, one, one will be right, ukraine is in the soviet union, and here it will be wrong, which someone occupied and in the future he will have to continue to occupy. it seems to me that he has such a plan. we really understand that by and large the entire territory of ukraine can be under attack now literally there in 5-7 minutes we will have pavlo latushko, deputy chairman of the united transitional cabinet of belarus, and with him let's talk. what does he know? until then, the musician, mr. yaroslav. well, let's hear, of course, we want to

hear your opinion about everything we talked about here, and i would like to ask about georgia. here, in this context, i would like to ask, you know, we very often see these shots that georgia is one of of the few countries that are ready to accept russians and if you listen to their well, so -called liberals, they say, well, what to do in our country , people don't want to serve, they don't want to go kill ukrainians, so they need to flee somewhere from the other side, the position is that if you don't want to kill ukrainians, then change the regime as we are used to in ukraine. if we don't like the government, we are always ready to change it, and there is a third aspect of the story with georgia , and some experts are already talking about it now, that it could be the so-called quiet annexation, and then when a huge number of russians will be on the territory of georgia, er, putin will say well, what about us? there are almost equal numbers of russian refugees on the territory of georgia, we will now come, er, in order to take them there to join the army or mobilize them, or just

georgia. look how many russians live there, they are ours land, what scenarios could there be, first of all, i would like to return to this topic, which has been announced, whether the russian federation will decide on a nuclear war, because for the past seven months, i still have a strange feeling of bifurcation, as if reality exists, and this is the impression. i think that almost everyone here in the studio, they are watching us at night, too, somewhere, uh, they feel something similar. it’s like we’re watching some american thriller movie, that is, it’s unbelievable to the end, we are now talking and discussing really scary topics, is it possible a nuclear war or no. do you live or not, the world will not survive, and that is why i would like to bring such a small positive on september 26, maybe this event has passed by, but it happened, it has already happened, and it is truly a

global event of a planetary scale. so, on september 26, the american umbrella that was launched nasa it crashed into an asteroid that flew by at a distance of 10 million km e-e long with a diameter of 160 m collided with this asteroid and shifted its trajectory to what extent it is currently unknown nasa scientists are studying it, hence the conclusion that our partners the united states the americans have extremely powerful means of destruction, if an asteroid could be reached for 10,000 e-e, 10 million kilometers away, then i think that the kremlin and the bunker, wherever it is located, can also be reached, which, after all, there is a desire and it is already e-e purely specifically about what was articulated by our western partners, in particular, biden repeated the word don't don't three times after him, pennsylvanian jason

ivan, the national security adviser to the president of the united states, together with secretary of state blinkin, although they represented earlier in the cabinet of president biden, if the two wings, the pacifist and the moderate wing, and the sufficiently militant wing , spoke together at the press conference and said that extraordinary measures will be applied to russia, if it only dares, that is, it will not apply, but will dare to warn our arch -enemy. i think that it was so clearly understood that it is unlikely that the president of this nedo-empire, putin, will use and decide to use weapons, although, again, as previous colleagues talked about a monkey with a grenade, everything can be because using chess terminology, putin essentially has four moves left: the first move is how we now

see blackmail with tactical nuclear weapons; the second move is the use of tactical nuclear weapons; the third move is blackmail with strategic nuclear weapons ; and the fourth move is the end of the world with his last appeal and she said, uh, uh, vice chancellor mrs. merkel recently, yes, today or yesterday , it seems she said this is not a bluff, putin does not block him, we must take it seriously and what he expressed is political wisdom, i'm sorry, i don't know i simply lack comments, but then where was the political wisdom of the ex-chancellor when she was in 2007 at the budapest nato summit allowed putin to blackmail almost the entire west without providing the pdp, where was the wisdom of the chancellor when she signed the agreement about the first stream of the northern stream and the second stream goes the wisdom

of the great helmsman of all times and peoples who wants to be higher than lenin and stalin. he has the same last name, for some reason, a strange coincidence of circumstances ends. so, where is his wisdom when he started this absolutely senseless unprovoked and in advance of the progressive war, there are so many questions for some of our so-called non-partners in the west, although fortunately there are fewer and fewer of those putin fair-tails, now returning to the issue of georgia in the last 10 days, e-e, the migration and border service of georgia e- summing up the results , she noted that over the past 10 days, i emphasize, 57,000 russians crossed the georgian border and 62,000 left the territory of georgia with something, that is, in fact, there remained about 12,5,13,000 people who entered georgia from russia

but here we also need to carry out a certain analysis in order to understand the structure of the people who enter georgia. of course, there are some russians, but there are 157 thousand georgians living on the territory of russia, 2.5-2.5 million hryvnias, we know that in armenia from there is no common border with russia, they have to cross the georgian border and the territory of georgia in transit in order to get to the motherland . were georgians and armenians, and those who passed through the transit were russians who went to turkey or other countries of the middle east. there is an opinion that georgians happily welcome russian citizens because money is coming to ukraine. this is a false opinion. i am talking to my friends from georgia. and georgians

and ukrainians who live there, this is not true. if you look on facebook, i have this check on my phone right now, which was published in one of the restaurants , yes, well, it is interesting in its text. today , there were demonstrations on the border of the georgian in russian, where are the georgian citizens with banners from the photo, we will try to show that they are not waiting for you here, that's why there is some speculation in the press about the position of georgia, it 's not as clear as it might seem at first glance, the georgian people remember very well and 1991 and 2008 and the annexation of abkhazia and ossetia, 20% of the territory of georgia is captured by russia, and still 40 km from the capital of georgia, tbilisi, there is a russian base and

tanks with their cannons pointed in the direction of tbilisi , so the situation is where three and a half million the population of a fairly poor country must balance between peace and war, between annexation and seizure, is quite difficult, and i do not think that it is possible to unequivocally condemn georgia for what it did or did not do in relation to ukraine, because there are hundreds of information about how much humanitarian aid was provided to georgia tons , yes, nowhere. not in the press. if necessary, i will send you a release, and then, if you agree, publish it in order to have a balance of information. do not condemn anyone here. of course, the state which decides to act like this. isn’t it so? what’s more, from these russian so-called liberals, you can now hear that they should be grateful to georgia and other countries that accept their

population, hmm, germany has practically opened its borders. we also have to accept refugees who avoid this check, it's great, we have to accept refugees from russia who avoid mobilization. well, for some reason, no one has problems and complaints about germany. and for some reason, little georgia has problems and complaints from the restaurant and writes to the check that the plans for the wide field and the dnipro and the steeps have become yours in moscow, further on the air sheep from ukraine live from london and for 30 minutes we talk about the main events on this day, the 218th day of russia's war against ukraine, russia is preparing to annex the captured territories after the pseudo-referendums, zelensky urgently convenes the national security council, the event prepares sanctions

, the fourth breakthrough on the northern stream that