it is getting better, that's why it's true. this is the factor that we constantly face, which we have to take into account, but again, this russian rap is not a panacea. people continue to work and give results, in principle. the number of our aero-development facilities is not decreasing, but increasing, despite the losses from the actions of the russian rap. well, we will return to the working topic. a vision of how we should choose priority directions for increasing the number of air defense systems, given a certain number of typical targets that threaten us, we

understand that a typical target is, in fact, our entire critical infrastructure, any thermal power plant, a thermal power plant - we will change it i am not saying anymore about the military facility in ukraine, there are thousands of them, and it is unfortunately impossible to cover everything. even last year, i took part in the development of a plan to protect the critical infrastructure of ukraine, unfortunately , then we already understood that it is almost impossible to save after all, before the start of the war, there was a call from the soldiers and the president of our country to the western partners to please close the sky for us, because we are unable to do it ourselves, therefore, except for today, pressing the issue of supplying us with as many anti-aircraft means as possible, and most importantly anti-missile defense is not one and the same thing, i ask you to understand, let the audience understand this issue, it is against missile defense, also when i speak,

threats have already appeared that have been tested, this is the so-called arbolistic well of course or even tactical nuclear warheads national as it is known markets dagger against it unfortunately we do not have protection yet and we need to work on this issue the nearest rammstein which will take place in the coming days i hope will answer this question and can we talk about any such palliative solutions that can strengthen our capacity to protect there and the air there and to fight against ground bodies when we talk there about the combination of our mig-29 platforms and american missiles harm that is not waiting for fighters, which option is more simplified from the point of view of implementation, can such approaches be implemented in other projects, the americans said that it is possible, in particular, to place cruise missiles on transport planes , providing them with er with er dropping from the air,

such a seemingly paradoxical idea or they are adaptive for our capabilities. can we go in such an asymmetric way? i would like to ask this question to mr. oleksandr and then to mr. vyacheslav, what could be asymmetric solutions with great efficiency with a quick result to your previous question i meant what should we do directly now of course when we consider the medium term perspective it will try to even start let it be medium term from two years of course such polyactive solutions as installation on any transport aircraft or even remember my islan he also was considered as a carrier of any air-to-ground missiles or jdm planing munitions and so on, what are they called by the americans? all this is possible and must be done what you asked about installing transport planes er and dropping

missiles from them such projects to antonov were called air condition air launch several from two to light ones really that genre 26th - this is a beautiful medium a beautiful platform in order to attach several missiles of different classes to him under the wing or under the fuselage, all this can and should be done only once again, i will return to the fact that everything must be systematic, everything must be thought out from the top to the bottom level, and i repeat from the top to the bottom, and not as usually happens with us, it still happens quite a bit, we are solving some lower problem about it, we are trying to create large chimeras, getting to the very top, your vision of whether there is such a spectrum of asymmetric approaches in our defense industrial capabilities to quickly increase

the capabilities for destruction enemy targets well, if we are talking about palliative solutions, for example , the use of air-to-air missiles as anti-aircraft missiles, that is, in principle, this is what was implemented only during the cold war in chaparelle complexes, when the winder site air missiles were used as anti-aircraft missiles, then the same nasans that we expect there are also air-air missiles used as anti-aircraft missiles, or, for example, the israeli spider, where air missiles are also used as anti-aircraft units. using the same missiles, for example r27 and their various modifications, could supplement the short and medium- range anti-aircraft missiles that we have and the number of which is limited and

at least for the protection of, for example, industrial objects, i.e. to fight there with cruise missiles with er-e barrage decorations by these iranian martyrs and to strengthen our air defense there in the nearby er-e field , that is, on the front. that is, it is one of his examples , that is, what theoretically can be implemented, well, in an acceptable time limit, mr. oleksandr, you just mentioned your project, do you know this es, is it such a multifunctional unmanned complex , is there a place for this development in the order of battle of the ukrainian army after a certain period of time ago that as we understand it, we will have to spend 2-3 years on a palliative solution, and then we will

have to come up with new system solutions that give maxim an effective return, so in this sense, if you outlined this robotic air future, would we we have the potential for this to realize such a future and what steps should be taken for this, you see, the war stopped the progress actually and mine directly in this direction, really already starting from the 25th year until 2030 such air foreign sea drones platforms, robotic platforms, they will be replaced more and more in the troops, well, first of all, it is in the western troops and, unfortunately, in the chinese troops, the so-called piloted directly preparation er, what concerns the asfantsev directly, this is a platform for raising any weapons into the air air air ground it's the same plane as let's say well, i won't

take the mig-29, it's heavier, but it's like something like the korean t-50, for example, it can be said that it's a comparable plane, but it already has signs first of all, it is an unmanned aircraft, it is already an aircraft of the sixth generation, having signs of reduced radio visibility, hidden storage of weapons. therefore, this aircraft is capable of penetrating through the protected protected airspace of the enemy and delivering strikes . simply will there be a place. and this place is already provided for by future doctrines and directly by the air forces of modern states. well, what i said, the same similar ideas of the concept are already used

naval and ground forces are already in use, they are already undergoing tests and as i say, 2030, we will find it with you, we will see that it is the mechanized component that will become more and more pilotless vyacheslav please tell me your evaluations of the robotic platforms in the air and on the ground due to the peculiarities of the conduct of hostilities precisely with the russian federation, why is there actually so little implementation of ground robotic platforms, why the limitation of options for drones in terms of range, is it possible to say that there are some significant systemic obstacles at the level of tactics that make such active progress impossible, or is the problem technological, technical, what is the problem here, uhu, that the russians had some experience, it is negative, and the use of robotic platforms in syria, where they are ground platforms, is the first the solution to

combat conditions is to use er, well, the problem is, in principle, obvious that it is difficult to make a really high-quality automated er ground platform that will search for targets and determine the necessary that is, it is a rather complex system, if we are talking about remote control, then the problem of ground platforms is to ensure constant communication between the operator and the platform, even for the use of repeaters, that is, in contrast to aviation platforms where, let's say, robotic systems acquire more and more more widespread and there, er, it is easier to implement it in ground platforms, well, let’s say, not so much, and this one is simple. rather, if we are talking

about ground platforms, it would be useful if it were some such remote-controlled vehicles that went ahead of the mechanized convoys in case of mining routes, because it is no secret that mining from both sides leads to significant losses in both people and equipment, and unfortunately there and in our unit, because you lost on the copper fields, including your own er, that's why this is such a ground platform, let's say so, er, demining , it would really be very useful in modern conditions, if we are talking about a combat platform equipped with weapons, then there are many how many questions? it will be effective. oleksandr, when you spoke from the perspective of the vision of the future and the third

pillar of our competitive advantages on the battlefield, there should be a mobile defense system. or maybe other components related to mobility. i would like to hear you outline this the third component or then understand how to implement it in practice very well. this question connects with what my colleague just said. of course, when we are talking about the ground component, you still cannot replace an armored personnel carrier or a tank, because manpower is needed somehow to transport, therefore, it will not be about the fact that there will be an unmanned armored personnel carrier, this is a ridiculous truth. when we talk about mobile systems, it should essentially be the same as in the air there is a so-called loyal introduced, that is, there is a prepared aircraft and next to it, they fly distributed with distributed functions, several unmanned aircraft, one of them performs the function of sara radar, the second performs

the function of transporting additional weapons for the preparation of the aircraft, and so on. and so on, the same concept of cluster cluster control system, it is used for ground and mobile and fire systems , that is, there are conventionally several mobile command points next to which from a short distance in order to enter protected radio communication, which is still difficult to suppress, there are unmanned combat vehicles, but of course, they are led by some commanders, people, so far we are not talking about what will be applied, as we went with you, quantum super hypercomputers were talking, which will perform exactly what i was talking about the search and destruction of targets directly without human intervention, this will happen someday but we still have to live before that vyacheslav about mobility, the need for tanks will not go anywhere, and the need for armored personnel carriers and the like will not go anywhere, but

they will be reinforced and supplemented by some aircraft an optionally piloted aircraft, i.e. a fighter from which you can detach the front part and place additional equipment instead of the pilot, etc. you can’t replace its application on the field of god yet, but when we talk about mobility on the battlefield or increasing mobile defense, that’s general volodymyr gavrilov, the deputy minister of defense for armaments, spoke literally last week at a conference in the united states, where he spoke about our needs and he told such an approach that now winter is approaching and it would be very good, relatively speaking, to have a significant number of hummers, which units are equipped with secure communications, a significant number of attack drones

the order is for such mobile groups and for these groups to actively operate in the winter period, relatively speaking, destroying enemy targets, that is, once again to switch to a fragmented format of using our capabilities, to the extent that such a concept is realistic , because from one point of view and there, the enemy has bt tanks small mobile groups, to what extent this direction can be effective and give results on the battlefield, of course, it can not only be effective, but also during the war, it showed its effectiveness, because mobile groups, for example, against tanks, they are actively used, they will introduce an active search for the whole and their destruction, or, for example, it is used to cover the e-e flanks e-e rear and so on, that is, mobile actions can definitely be effective and indeed now the problem of transport for us is well

one of the most urgent because what we see with our own eyes is the use of civilian non-wheel drive vehicles, that is, these cars with which the bulk of our infantry are equipped, primarily the territories, they simply can not leave the asphalt and if we are talking about at least there is some dirt, that is, the kharkiv offensive operation, infantry units on these tanks were used quite actively for the gazelka so on and so on and so on and they reached their goal only because there was no rain when we were returning from the russian border to the base and it started to rain a little then we are on four-wheel drive vehicles and let’s just say that we left with problems, and these civilian cars simply will not come out the second time, this is the use in our armed forces of a large number of unheard -of four-wheel drive vehicles

is located, let's say, in a not very good technical condition, mostly and this is what we also see all the time: someone skids someone, someone there, uh, broke down, is being repaired, and so on. there are 10-20 thousand new, i emphasize new civilian pickups from western partners, this is not what was desired, all that we need, because the mobility of our army has increased significantly, and as for mobile groups against tank groups with the same anti-aircraft means manpads are some sort of raiding groups and our infantry would be trivial, it would become much more mobile in modern weather conditions because, again, an example

from my own life, we arrive at two sections of the front and they tell me that you will not pass there because there are tanks and bmp broke a dirt road and you simply won't cross over moving faster than we can move behind it, that is, cameras, army four-wheel drive trucks and, er, civilian new pickups in commercial quantities - this is what we desperately need now in the weather conditions that will be autumn, winter, spring, that is, here you can completely agree with our drivers who say that the summers are. to stop a little in view of running out of time and i would like to literally give you 30 seconds each

mr. oleksandr that is extremely important for us in order to ensure victory on the battlefield in the medium term education and science and choosing the right partners, mr. vyacheslav, your brief summary of what we need to win. yes, i completely agree. if we are talking about the medium-term perspective, it is human potential and the development of industrial potential to produce the systems we need on our own. thank you for this, readers. i will remind you that the guests of the espresso studio were oleksandra los - he is the ex-head of the state enterprise antonov, a doctor of technical sciences, and now a captain of the armed forces, who takes care of promising directions of development weapons of the ukrainian army, as well as vyacheslav tseluyko military analyst and now a serviceman of the special operations forces of the armed forces of ukraine and then the espresso broadcast

continues olga leny with the program chronicles of the information war stay on our channel politics economy culture sports technology this is what the news looked like until february 24, 2022 today , one topic that is relevant is the war for the sake of information security and comprehensive coverage of the situation in the country. watch our espresso news channel and the euro espresso program for ukrainians. of refugees in europe joint airing with the atp channel radio freedom program chas time voice of america inclusion of public television journalists news broadcasts bbc news ukraine and france 24 as well as broadcast of the informational marathon the only news together we are strong glory to ukraine

there are no more contradictions there is one nation that defends its land there are no more countries of the first, second and third world, there is a civilization that repels the aggressor, there are no more foreign cities and foreign children, there is a homeland and parents for everyone, there are no more soldiers and civilians, we are hardened in the flame we are united for the sake of victory we believe in our struggle we believe in our victory we unbreakable questions to all fans of the sport of football with you traditional sunday war and sport and the team of the football format i am oleksandr vashchuk and andriy malinovsky hello andriy hello sashko good day to all our fans ah yes uh, the

week was quite full of football, so today we have a lot of topics and i think we will go dynamically, we have a lot of exclusives, we also worked in krakow, where there is a decisive football match for us we are working with the scottish team now during the fifth round of the ukrainian premier league, we start chronologically with our national team, after all, the result of the match and scotland depended very much on the further fate of our national team, first of all, we wanted to win the group for this it was necessary to win against the team of scotland. well, secondly, we immediately had a seed in the second basket already during the draw, which will take place in literally a week and we will find out our opponents for the european championship in the qualifying stage, here we come to the match 0:0 there are no goals, so you won't see the scorers, you will see such statistics that, after all, we didn't play there to win, but we could have scored at least one ball, two, and two. well, right now, let's go,

if we go into detail, in fact, we played better in this match by all accounts indicators, the main indicators of our advantage, there were three times more eh deserved a scored goal, the winning goal of this match, corner kicks, shots into the plane, the percentage of ball possession, eh, passes, their accuracy, eh, that is, almost all the main indicators were but not in our favor the main most important indicator was enough - this goal was scored, which would have brought us victory, three points and, accordingly, the first place in the league of nations in our division, and we were already preparing for the elite e-e of the league of nations for division a and were in the second search during the draw for the qualification of the championship well, what is there to say here that after all, the conclusion is that ukraine failed and in this league of nations too, that is, again, if you analyze the cycle , everything was going to the point that we had to win and even this decisive week we came out clear the favorites conceded to the donbar game against the scots , we failed to take the revenge in krakow, where

the nominal home matches were played, the only one we managed was from the armenian team, which took the last step a-a in our group, well, and accordingly, the results were not taken into account there, so we therefore, we will regret the third basket now, this is already in a strategic context, in the context of the draw in the european championship. which we had to a large extent during the entire cycle , but it so happened that we, the scots, did not manage to score the necessary points, i.e. ani at hamton did not hold on there at all. there was a fiasco and we did not manage to win in the field. well, here again we have to say as it is that this is a failure from the point from a mathematical point of view, the lack of progress of our team, and now, it has always been the case that it is the head coach who should be responsible for the result, and in fact, if you analyze the most important matches of oleksandr

petrakov, his national team, and our national team of ukraine, this is a great match and this match with scotland a great match for the world cup we lost the match to scotland for the first place in the league of nations we lost that is, all the other matches well that's fine somewhere you can even positively evaluate the results of the head coach and his staff, however strategically the most important matches we lost at the world cup we won't play and the same way in the league of nations we won't be relegated uh really so if i say scotland's draw with this scotland we should have won because we said that in scotland lost mcdonough and robertson, tierney, and patterson, well, you could have all of them. there, they lost four of the most expensive players, and out of the five, they lost four, because if it was true that they were all healthy, then i have a question. who is the stronger national team, ours or scotland ? what are these players saying correctly, they play in the top clubs of the epl, and against

this scotland, losses are not victories, i agree - this is a failure, very serious losses, because in scotland and by the scots, and once again we note that it is not france, not spain, not england, not italy, not germany. that is it not a top national team, so it was necessary not just to fight against this scotland on equal footing, but to win because that was one of the two matches that we and the scots had again, uh, the context, uh, after all , of the analysis of the general work of oleksandr petrakov's coaching staff, and here it is necessary to determine what exactly the coaches are because oleksandr petra kovtsia but there needs to be a headquarters where there needs to be flexible tactics where it is still necessary to have an influence on the football players because, well, again, we have now decided the fate, even small things like that there were objective reasons, there were none, but there were no questions about the goalkeeper at all. ani, uh, lunin, first of all, ani trubin was not led to this so

precisely, but still there was a loss, and this was not an objective reason. popova although he is not the main football player from the battle of the national team. nevertheless, there were losses, there was a lost chaperenko. however, now we are talking about football players who should also have been in the national team, who did not make it, why, for example, the same sable, because he plays, scores, messes up regularly , even when he was not called there, he anyway he played when he was called up, he played the same way because there is no influence, well, again, zinchenko arteta even before the week of the national teams, he smiled when they asked how serious zinchenko's injury was, he smiled in the match with tottenham, he was the best, that is, two days ago, he could not play for the a team now he is coming out and becoming the best at least in terms of the effectiveness of passes in the third part of the field. and this is a very serious indicator in the context of the victories of arsenal - not by tottenham. that is, the struggle for leadership in the english premier league was the same sable now he is coming out, he is scoring a goal, a beautiful goal, no less beautiful than leo messi scored. that is, we

are talking about the fact that there is no influence. zinchenko said that he was injured there, he did not go to the national team, and he and his family were preparing for the match of the english championship. why were there any issues? i understand that on the sidelines it is necessary to ask why mykhailochenko is called in the position of left defender, who plays only in the championship of ukraine and you are not with the top teams, but there are more well, that is, he is a spare left the defender of the miners and not calling the main defender of brugge, these are the questions that we can now calmly blame the coaching staff for why they were not resolved. what is really being said about the fact that the microclimate has definitely worsened because, as i call it, the spirit of rakitsky is returning to that that yaroslav always liked to talk like that at the national team matches in a friendly way, injury injury, and then at the shakhtar match, he spent 90 minutes and before the national team games, and after the same, you understand correctly, the sables are called metalochenka who doesn't play anymore and the sables don't call him , you can understand him i will meet because well, i

won't understand from the national team well, listen , he's not a young boy, he's not a young boy he wasn't called up he planned his business there and here he is, all the same he has dignity there, there is honor, why wasn't he called immediately, he is better than mykhailychenko, he is called. and now let's go . arrivals . there it is it is terrible that he will not come to the national team there or he has a very serious illness there and then he will go to the matches and tear tottenham apart. i think he will never get into the national team anymore. roman yaremchuk spoke calmly but clearly. so, let's listen, let's listen , it didn't work out a little bit, i think you

know that the national team knows how to play football, the question was sent and they showed how to do it, so you see, roman says that it is necessary to show how to play in they know how to play football. maybe we need to put roman rayonchuk as the main striker, he is such is his status, his form allows him to play in the start of nubyk, there were moments, but he did not use them when he came out in the start, when they were substituted, he did a minimum of effective actions, this indicates that again still, uh, uh, there are problems according to the decision of the coaching staff, and that information what was leaked to the media, that is, now almost all bloggers , now accountants there are telling how much someone will receive, how much they will receive and told that the coaching staff in general there is premium, it only works, this also speaks of the status of our staff, who can now argue with petrarkov, well , in fact, it is nomi - oleksandr shovkovsky is coming, it is unlikely that he will get into this