therefore the problem is i think we will need to bring them back to their senses a few weeks ago, mr. colonel, you were in washington and had a conversation with representatives of the american administration during this period, for two to four weeks, the words and also the warnings of the russian authorities regarding the possibility the use of nuclear weapons, they are talking about a certain poseidon, they are talking about a nuclear train, which is like some kind of cloud, moving somewhere, it is not clear where, in what steppes, what do you think? the possibility of using putin's tactical nuclear weapons in the territories that he has now declared to be russian well, in general, i think that we should consider putin's use of nuclear weapons as a reality, under what conditions will it be, what will he be told about it,

who will do it, whether we can do it uh, let's say prepayment or not, that's another matter, but what they think about it, and now it depends on where, how we advance, what consequences will there be from the fact that we will vacate the territory, what they are discussing, is it going to fall? that's what they say and let's say our special services and we and the western special services, therefore, we must understand that it can be and our task is to prevent it, but as a reality we must perceive that it can be or will be in the territories that we are liberating eh, well, more likely, yes , what will be the solution adopted well, few people know. i am sure that even putin does not know this, but the fact that it is on the scales when making a decision of those who is this fact again about putin today,

as i said, he talked to the press and representatives of the public and talked about how he loves ukrainians, the ukrainian language, ukrainian culture, and how polite he is to the culture of the neighboring country, let's hear putin , we are all going, and despite the tragedy of today, and today, we have great respect for the ukrainian people, ukrainian culture, the ukrainian language, literature, and so on further, but er, and we have never allowed anything that is allowed in ukraine in relation to russian culture and the russian language, but we, on our part, will go our own way, we will treat everything with respect ukrainians, we have 3 russians of ukrainian origin and we don't make any difference, never did i never do, we don't collect seryoh any difference between russian ukrainians and this person, on the eve of the great war, the

large-scale invasion of russia into ukraine, talked about the fact that there are no ukrainians in ukraine made up lenin ukrainians played pototsky why mr. colonel in your opinion over the past seven months putin's rhetoric has changed very significantly sounds like the type do you know who he is horseman we will destroy you as a people sincerely yes ah, it has changed, it has changed very seriously, because before that it was destroyed without respect. and we forced them to respect us. will change even more, and in the end, they will already be thinking not about how to destroy us, about how to come to an agreement with us and get us out of the water dry with less losses than they will have because, well, and once again

i say we have what for fight and we do it with pride because we understand what is ahead of us and they are fighting without knowing what is ahead of them, they are fighting for some kind of unknown, realizing that every day they are climbing such a hole that more than one generation will need to get out of because our and this is victory will be ours and this is our future, there is even some small victories in them. every day they are just sinking deeper into the pit. thank you , colonel, for your participation in the program . at the front, friends, we work live on the espresso tv channel and also work simultaneously on social platforms on youtube and facebook. if you are watching us now on youtube, please like this video so that it can be promoted on youtube trends, subscribe to our

channel and you can also help our youtube channel has a small button under this video to sponsor, you can support us financially and support our channel and the development of the youtube channel, we can contact oleksandr hara, an expert in foreign affairs and security policy of the center of defense strategies . greetings, oleksandr. good day to you. good health. thank you for joining our broadcast, mr. oleksandr . you can hear us. on october 10, russian president putin approved the ratification of the so-called treaties that provide for the annexation of the occupied territories of ukraine in the donetsk, luhansk, kherson and zaporizhzhia

regions, based on these laws changes to the constitution of russia on september 30, there was a great reaction to the whole aunt about these treaties and the so-called accession, in your opinion , was the world's reaction to the annexation of ukrainian territories by the russians sufficient? well, considering the fact that they still occupied, the fact that our war continues - the liberation of our territories can certainly indicate that the insufficient reaction from the other side, we must understand that we are fighting with the largest nuclear power in the world and the largest military power in the world, so our armed forces are inferior to it, but after all, the iron human potential that they have definitely gives them the opportunity to continue this war actually. therefore, we have to look at everything realistically. and we have unconditional

successes and definitely that is what you can be proud of. from the russians, for example, from the fact that they do not know which borders they are in, and these pseudo-formations have been accepted into their ranks, because of course, since the annexation was announced, and our armed forces liberated a number of populated areas, i hope that while their so-called constitutional the court will consider something there, and then in fact there will be nothing to consider, these territories will be freed, the most important thing, of course, is that this illegal annexation was condemned, this farce, you know , in fact, sometimes we play on the side, well, let’s say it’s water in the russian mill when we say a pseudo -referendum is such a falsified referendum, what happened in our occupied territories, in principle, cannot be called that way, because this word

implies something, something else. which is partially possible, but there should be some opposition. that is, this is one part, but in any case, the whole civilized world threw an encroachment on our territory. unfortunately, thanks to the russian veto, the un security council did not pass a condemning resolution. unfortunately, among those who abstained and did not supported the territorial integrity of ukraine were such countries as india and china, and this, by the way, is an extremely important fact, because these states say that they are supporters of international law and sovereignty-territorial integrity for them it is especially important for china, because it considers taiwan to be an integral part of itself and an internal matter, and the return of taiwan to its native harbor. it is a pity that the chinese did so-so, the world reacted by imposing sanctions on officials and the company, and well, the united states took ramzam included almost all the so-called

deputies in their list, and also that before there were not, well, in fact, the families of the wives and children of the most high-ranking officials of the largest in the russian federation. only in order to record this moment. but the most important thing is that later we used this , including in the courts, because since there are facts of non-recognition , it will be easier for us to do it. well, of course , our situation is much better than in the baltic countries states that were annexed in the 1940s and were actually held captive by the soviet union until the end of the 1980s, we have a chance to liberate these territories and we see the readiness of our partners, first of all, of course, the united states, the last announcement of 625 billion dollars, i apologize help a before that, literally a week ago, one and one

billion dollars for armaments, the desire to help us gain territory, and there is a political agreement for this well , thank god that the europeans are in the same row , and in particular about the germans, because the germans do not recognize the these encroachments on ukrainian territory and we are ready to support ukraine, i like this formula very much, i like this formula as much as it takes , the world reacted as it did, but we have all the tools to correct this, let's say, historical injustice, volodymyr zelenskyi spoke with the president of the united states of america, joseph biden, they discussed military and financial assistance, we will hear from zelenskyi and in the evening, he spoke with the president of the united states, biden, first of all, he thanked him for the next package of defense support for our country, in particular, for the new heimers, of course, they also

discussed with president biden the key aspects of our interaction outside the defense sphere , in particular, financial support, in particular, for a support package in the amount of more than 12 billion dollars, they discussed political steps, international cooperation organizations were especially pleased to hear the words of president biden that our military inspires the whole world, our people inspire the whole world , and this is true. our victory in this war will show how much ukraine can give global strength, freedom, global strength of democracy. zelenskyy , they are and they are coming to ukraine and they allow the ukrainian military to hit targets, in particular in crimea, the deputy assistant secretary of defense of the united states informed about this at a pentagon briefing. of the united states of america for the affairs of russia, ukraine and eurasia, laura cooper, she reminded that crimea is ukrainian

territory and the pentagon also stated that the united states of america considers it expedient to transfer soviet and not western tanks to ukraine , that is what the pentagon says that we do not mind if these systems hit the territories of the targets in the territory of crimea, which belongs to ukraine, piskov immediately reacted to this phrase. he said that uh, this means that washington is somehow involved in what is happening in ukraine and they say this is a war between the russian federation and the united states of america. how do you interpret the fact that ukraine can use american weapons, in particular hymers, in order to return crimea home? well, first of all, article 51 of the un charter says that every country has

the right to self-defense. of international law first of all, but of course there is also the constitution, the law on the defense of ukraine and internal law, we can do it, this is the first moment, the second moment, this is what is true. there are certain conditions for the use of the american weapons er in relation to russian goals er russian and first of all it means goals on the territory of the russian federation because crimea is not the russian federation only 10 friends and friends such as armenia er hmm belarus there north korea recognized crimea as russian therefore of course that from from the point of view of washington's approaches. but in principle europeans, and this is our territory, we have the full right to use any weapon, the fact that the russians say that they are fighting here with nato, with the united states, that they are definitely part of the conflict here this is a delusion, but there are several aspects to it. well, first of all, the russians must admit that a country that does not

exist , with a nation that does not exist and an army that does not exist. it is difficult to accept and definitely. they are trying to show that they are fighting with more in their understanding to the opponents. the second point is internal mobilization. as you can see, if we had not started this war , the nato bases would be in ukraine and then we would have already bombed the crows, which roughly speaking means that it is important the third and most important from the point of view of real politics is the attempt to restrain our western partners from providing us with weapons in general and new types of weapons, well, first of all, of course, we are talking about tanks, aviation, operational-tactical, unfortunately, unlike the pentagon, the head of the national council security of the united states adheres to the opinion that it is not necessary to provoke russia, therefore it is

necessary to provide those weapons that will not give ukraine the opportunity to attack or there are targets in the depths of russian territory, this is actually a deterrent factor, but regarding crimea is absolutely normal, i am not saying from the point of view of legitimacy and moral, let's say so, the expediency of doing it, oleksandr, on september 30, when a coven was held in the st. george's hall of the kremlin with the participation of putin and his party , what we all expected, volodymyr zelenskyi , actually happened signed, together with the chairman of the verkhovna rada of ukraine and the prime minister of ukraine, an application or submitted an application for accelerated membership in the north atlantic alliance for today nine countries of the eastern and central europe has declared that they support

ukraine's entry into nato plus canada. why are other countries silent or very cautious about this now? well, of course, here again is the question of the russian federation being a nuclear power and we are in a state of conflict with this state and are occupied. territories to all arguments we have counterarguments because, for example, when germany became a member of nato in 1955, part of its territory was actually occupied by the dpr of that time, this is the first, second point, if you tell us. when we are told about some that we are not so democratic and other things, let's look at some countries that exist now and they have questions about democracy. i'm not talking about the actual 50s and 60s, well, imagine when they accepted the same greece and turkey in what condition democracies they were there because you remember those black colonels or things about incompatibility or incomplete

compatibility i think that what our armed forces have shown is the ability to destroy uh well let 's say someone who was perceived by potential adversaries as extremely powerful i think that's a good assessment of our ability to actually be contributors to european security, and by the way, we have to say that by and large it is true that we reduce the possibility of russia to introduce aggression against other nato member states on the european continent because what is there to swallow from well, this is actually a defeat for russia. he wants to be too optimistic, but in a strategic perspective, this is how it is, and of course there are those countries that cannot overcome their spells on psychological barriers. because they have already taken a big step forward. they began to supply the social democrats decided to supply lethal offensive weapons to ukraine before

that. well, hmm, actually the christian democrats who were more so, let's say, militant. if you can say that about the germans, they did not supply us with a single cartridge. progress is crazy progress 100 billion dollars that germany is going to spend on the modernization of its armed forces but there are certain nuances well, for example, you are the ones who will say i don't like the way they treat russia with such that they have such a right and belarus, in relation to which they have committed the greatest crimes, and with regard to the russians , this must definitely change further. all these nuclear weapons of putin are actually aimed at them, whether it is posidon or there is some kind of train of the 12th directorate of the

ministry of defense, that is, all these things are actually messages primarily to the germans, but for now everything is going more or less normally. we have hungary, a difficult partner, a neighbor who deserves to be told so let's say so, let them teach, to put it bluntly, or teach these people a lesson, of course, that they behave very badly in relation to ukraine. so, actually, for other nato members, well, the most important thing is that there are sympathizers of ukraine there is an understanding that ukraine is an important factor of european security and i think i have understood that in the concept of a europe in peace and freedom and flourishing it cannot be realized if ukraine is not part of this space of freedom, democracy and of security i would say that belarus , moldova and georgia should also be there, but let's just say that for now it is less relevant, that's why there is time, i don't believe in the quick

entry of ukraine into nato, but it will be much faster than they think, uh, in berlin or in other capitals. by the way, the russian ambassador to the united states of america stated that there is a danger of a direct conflict between russia and the west. the decision of the united states of america to send more military aid to ukraine increases the danger of a direct military conflict between russia and announced antonov at the same time that you mentioned about these weapons that russia constantly announces and that this message is directed at the germans, because the germans themselves once talked about this mega weapon, not in 1943, in the underworld, what kind of mega weapon is there that can save hitler from defeat when we talk about 1943 - 2022, is it correct to compare

the situation in which hitler found himself then, who was already being beaten and putin, who was also being beaten in the east and south of ukraine? well, you know these historical analogies, of course they are very convenient, but so would we we can talk about putin as about hitler, or he actually committed the entire list of those crimes that were included in the nuremberg trial and later in international conventions. of course, in this sense there is, but i would say from the russian point of view that for him it means the collapse of the soviet union union was the biggest political disaster, as he says and in his opinion, this is the weakness of the political elites of the soviets and the same kdb in which he lived . and this was the most important thing, that is, they must be powerful and tough. the screwing of these nuts in the russian federation, especially after the 14th, even more so after february 24

of this year, that is, it is preparing for the scenario, well , in fact, in the year 91, although in fact the 14th year is more suitable for modern russia, that is, in fact , the way in which the russian federation lost e- e world war i and then began to mean, well, revolutions. yes, and then the government changed, and even more demons came, and before that, in fact, it seems to me that it plays into our hands, because they are simply preparing and trying to treat a certain a disease that does not exist, but actually they will get something else , unlike in 17th year there or 905th in 17th year, there are no powerful forces in the russian federation that could lead this protest movement and propose some agenda. well, if not some new ideology, communism, or , i don’t know, capitalism, or at least something that could organize, that is, an organizational minority, and

roughly speaking, there are no bolsheviks in russia, and therefore, most likely, it will be in the seams, first of all, regional ones, as well as kadyrov’s most important the tic-toker of the russian federation was handed the epaulettes of a colonel-general. imagine how the hero girkin himself perceives this. by the way, he is also an interesting personality . -e means this person, actually, such and such things will happen, most likely it will be conflicts in the regions on a regional basis, and of course there is already a certain dissatisfaction on the ethnic principle. we saw that in the same how do dagestanis perceive this so-called partial mobilization? because there are white people who do not fight

. mobilization, it will complete the russian economy, and most importantly, it will touch this layer of the population, you don't call it otherwise, because they are not citizens, which was ready to rejoice in all these victories of the annexation of crimea, support for the pseudo-formation of donetsk luhansk, and now they need blood for this to pay for this show and of course that these are different terms of the contract if you are on the sofa if you are in the okopia of course what does it accelerate means the collapse of this system and most importantly i think that these are 1-2 successful operations in the ukrainian armed forces well, i think that certain ones are very unemployed there is news from our southern front. if it is possible to neutralize

, destroy or grind and surrender a large group of russian troops, but they will have to withdraw from us or at all, well, leaving at least crimea behind, yes. that is, this is a sacred thing, so what actually, i think that we are seeing. we live in a very interesting historical time. we have to finish this chimera of the russian world. well, you mentioned the chimera of the russian world of ramzan kadyrov, whom we today awarded the rank of colonel general. the following commercials appeared in the mass media about heroic of kadyrov's sons, who is ready to go to war , and at the end of this video it even goes as if kadyrov would like to become a sheikh . fuck himself and even send his children to protect the motherland so akhmat eli and adam taydrovy will show

himself in battle the one who sent his sons to the war can’t have peskov rogozin no patrushev only such people as ramzan akhmatovychka dyr should revive the russian army only so we will win for the victory akhmat sila , that is, mr. oleksandr. as far as i understand , putin is already betting on kadyrov's hawk, and already shoigu, and he has faltered like those hawks who started this great war in february in 2022 have actually already expired correctly, i understand, well, i don't i think that he is making a special bet on someone, he is playing, and we have seen it. by the way, on our example, remember how lenin danilovich also played with favorites, but in reality he tested them and used them. of course, putin is such a political monster who is cynical and it will be so in

order to to stay in power to combine, because all the shvyns are to blame for what went wrong, not him, that he actually perceived ukraine as a non-existent state and actually planned such an absolutely senseless adventurous military operation and in by the way, the head of the foreign intelligence service. by the way, there was probably such a person who understood what kind of trouble russia is getting into - do you remember this meeting of the national security council of the russian federation, so i don't think that he acts as such a figure, he is an unacceptable figure for a large number of russians, and i think that even in the north caucasus, he is not an acceptable figure, he is just now the favorite, he has these cutthroats, but in fact, all of them are actually cannon fodder , they are not, they do not have heavy weapons. not i'm talking about missile things. you called that in this

sense the russian federation and the armed forces, and which are definitely not controlled by the special services, they can destroy all this very quickly . life to mr. putin i think that it is already clear that there is er hmmm they are headed for defeat, it is clear that they are, let's say, a laughing stock for the whole world and not only for ukrainians, and that is exactly why inside these er so-called hawks it is already possible such thoughts are heard and the other question is that it is difficult to organize other questions. what is certain that is inherent to all russians and in particular to those who sit in the kremlin, this is a total horizontal distrust. by the way, this is our strong point here. there may be such a mirror wide scale, but the hawks who are there

around putin, they understand that he is leading the russian federation to disaster. maybe, i hope, definitely. we cannot consider it part of the strategy, but these seem so small that this chance has increased, especially against the background of these threats of the use of nuclear weapons, which will not be in favor of the russian federation, there are a large number of explanations for this, such as moral ones, although they are not guided by morality, but the most important ones are those that are called in the plane of real politics. thank you , oleksandr, for conversation this was oleksandr khara, an expert on foreign and security policy of the center for defense strategies, friends, if you are watching us now on youtube, please like it, you can become our sponsor we will be very grateful to you on the youtube channel. i will say goodbye to you until tomorrow. tomorrow we will be visiting major general of the armed forces of ukraine serhiy kryvonos. we will talk about the situation on the front line of the

threat, the reaction of the liver to putin's threats, and in a word it will be interesting not to sleep at 5 p.m. :00 i wish you good health bye bye guest of explosions overnight russia struck bila tserkva in kyiv region using iranian kamikaze drones where else can iranian drones fly and how will kyiv respond the price ceiling for russian oil and there is a blow to the defense sphere of the ambassador