in your opinion, what should happen next, is it possible to bring bohdan lviv to justice, what kind of responsibility should this be, this is a great question why am i happy with the final from the semi-final in history, because he was fired by the head of the supreme court, yes, the economic cassation, i'm sorry, messed up and with that it is necessary to understand, but the head of the supreme court, well , he instilled the obvious leadership, he did it according to the law, but he fired him. because if the chairman of the supreme court did not do this, well, then at the supreme court it would be possible to put a cross. well, because they are illegal it would be a sneeze if they hadn't fired well, they didn't understand the constitution on the constitution on the law profiles there and simonov, but thank god the problem with his judiciary was solved inside the supreme court, that's all the court could do thank god we're moving on i think the president should take away his citizenship if the president had not previously taken away the citizenship of citizens of other citizens

of ukraine with other citizenships, there would be an option. well, this is the first precedent. citizenship in similar situations already has experience well, that's why you can't take it there and leave it here, that's why it seems to me that the president i wouldn't look for his place while the petition gathers votes there is very little time left so i think that well, it's a matter of two or three days and then it seems to me that it would be correct to take away citizenships at home further, but to punish for, well, in fact, for entering inaccurate data in the declaration, this is another word combination of information . in the declaration and it's just a separate criminal story already in the criminal process, but let's sum up lviv everything, that is, it already affects the subject of bohdan lviv er, two things are important to me right now,

half of the economic cassation well, we understand that this is an inadequate story and they are there it's up to the judges why is economic beauty so important, because it is the most important for business, because everyone has disputes. that's where all the raiding takes place. that's where a little bit of cassation happens. but mostly , that's the last resort. and this is about business, if there is half of the court to sneeze directly at the norm of the constitution, then what kind of investor will come here to do something. that is why we need to deal with this, we need to clean up these guys, and secondly, the sbu should deal with itself. how did it happen that they let a russian citizen head the whole court the federation is not the only one there and not only in the supreme court, that is, if there is a hole, it can be assumed that it is in many places , so the sbu should repair the process so that it

does not happen again and check other top officials, another interesting epic ended at the end of july, almost biennial with the appointment of the head of the specialized anti-corruption prosecutor's office, and i remember in one of the interviews with one of the publications, you put the responsibility for delaying this process on the head of the competition commission for the election of the head of the sap, kateryna koval. and then you there was even a post on social networks about the fact that we in the cpc, that is, in the anti-corruption center, will not forget you, ladies, when we forgot, we forgot, we had a fair war for six months. i feel like looking at who all your lawyer earns money by ordering services from her, we had to find a way to find out who continues to order services from a person who buried the reputation of the entire country for 2 years. thank you for reminding

me honestly because of the war, because of the service, we forgot. because who is behind it hmm, i will say that the story is finished, thank god thank god that you have an active body and we are not a request to the ukrainian authorities, let's not repeat the story with the anti-corruption bureau and what to do in order to avoid the repetition of such delays with tenders, i am an optimist, specifically everything and the procedure must be changed in the law and it will be done. i think by the end of this year it will be one of the demands of our european partners. so i predict the second story with the anti-corruption bureau is calmer there because there is a commission of six people, not 11 - 6 of them are three internationals - this is half of the commission with an impeccable reputation and they have a leading vote, that is, if three of the three from the

ukrainian authorities will be somewhere, well, it will be inadequate news i think that this will not happen, but if suddenly they calmly hold a competition with their votes. however, the competition was held. the new head of the specialized anti-corruption prosecutor's office appointed oleksandr klymenko and the newly appointed general prosecutor, mr. kostin, and what has changed in the work of the specialized anti-corruption prosecutor's office . of the time of klymenko's appointment, if you would evaluate the results of these few months of his work, it seems to me one and a half months, i will tell you, see rotterdam plus one of of the largest corruption schemes in the history of ukraine, 40 billion, in short, what is rotterdam plus? in short , you and i overpaid for communal services, because a formula was written into them, according to which the delivery of energy carriers was calculated as if it was from rotterdam, and it was from the occupied territories. in short, yes this case was closed

four times four times four times we defended ourselves in the courts in a different way the former prosecutor general defended the prosecutor who closed the case in one word a new manager came garden the case went to court full stop the investigation is over and now we will find out in court who ruled wrongly in public hearings, first of all, a cry in front of the whole country, but the epic is over with the closure of the case, the trial will be sorted out, we will move on in the first story in the country, for the first time the residence of the oligarch, where he lives, kolomoiskyi in bukovel, was searched for the first time in the history of ukraine , and there was no leak by the way, he was not warned, i.e. everything took place, a full-fledged search was carried out. the deputy, among other things, he received a suspicion and if i am not mistaken, the case has already gone to court, i will not roll you over to me, it has already gone to court, or it will not take more

time for the case to proceed here, what was next, er, kolomoisky, rotterdam, plus trukhin, there was something else in addition to the current cases in центренерго центренерго suspicions, the expansion of the circle of suspects, that is, this is only the beginning why because we have 10 of the best prosecutors out of 40 10 out of 35 i'm sorry, they are fighting and they need to be returned to work now, because that's a third of the prosecutors and this is the best prosecutor even now this is a separate story, imagine they will go back somewhere he has the best prosecutors, the dynamics will be completely different, believe me, it is completely different, even better. well, the position of the head of the nabu director is important, after all, this is a law enforcement agency, and in such organizations , leadership is important, there are procedures, corporate culture, this is a strong structure, a strong institution but leadership is important, that is, is it possible to

conclude that these two months that mr. klymenko has been in the position of a-and you characterize as positive dynamics in his work in general in the work of a specialized by the anti-corruption prosecutor's office extremely effectively , it is now obvious to everyone why his appointments were blocked for so long and this is only the beginning and we have already seen several attacks on authorities and corrupt institutions. i think they will not be the last. what are you waiting for ? how noisy the investigation is possible and i like all of the new anti-corruption prosecutors, they do not speak until the moment of implementation, that is, we will learn about their investigation only when the suspicion is investigated. i believe that that's right, there are many abuses around the topic of corruption and everyone is abused often, the authorities in the dbrets abuse the baby, everyone abuses what they have not yet suspected , and you have already appointed multibillion-dollar schemes, that one is

guilty, that one, friends. well, let's go, if someone is guilty or you think so, it is your right to suspect communication and that the correct strategy of law enforcement agencies. i simply call on everyone else to stop this practice until there is no suspicion. here it is, open the doors, there is suspicion, it is normal, because there why can you talk about suspicion publicly, because there is a preventive measure and that's all there will be a court, that is, this is already a public part of the case . before that, dear law enforcement officers, i'm sorry, shut your mouth, because you haven't collected anything yet, and someone 's reputation has already been destroyed. let's go without this, are there any cases of investigation on which, in your opinion , the corruption authorities are slowing down, i have more expectations not on matters, but on powers, for example , now the anti-corruption prosecutor klymenko cannot start the extradition of the suspects involved in the suspects because it is done through the prosecutor general. and i am not sure yet

to the prosecutor general of ukraine, we are still looking into why what worries you, i don't have any markers in him. when he did things that went against the will of the political elite. i'm not saying he's bad if i do n't know. to evaluate the prosecutor general, they have not reached them yet. i remember one of the markers that alarmed you, it was also that a deputy from the ruling faction of the ruling party was appointed to the position of prosecutor general, so this marker remained incorrect in principle, that is, this is the marker that was given to the person at the start a minus in the reputation of trust, even if kostin is cool, i hope he is cool, we assume that for his colleagues in the west, he is perceived as a political protege, even if he is not, he is like that about a powerful party, he starts, well , such a beginning. this is the beginning of the content, and we need

a plus to of the prosecutor general is not even in the history of corruption in the history of crimes of reprimanding russia for war crimes therefore it is bad in principle a bad story when the prosecutor general is a political appointment it should be a competition the best does not win and then he he won the competition and he starts with a plus, he is the winner, he owes nothing to anyone, he is a professional, the position itself needs such logic, it is not about the last name, it is about the logic of the position, therefore, in the anti-corruption strategy, which is a law in ukraine , it seems to me that there is a clause on changing the law on prosecutors, which will provide for competition i will honestly tell you about competitions, i understand that you have already started talking about the competition for the appointment of a new director of the national anti-corruption bureau, and this is one of the requirements of the european union for

that we retain the status of a candidate for membership of the european union, and there is still one of the requirements - the introduction of the reform of the constitutional court of ukraine and the provision of a transparent process for the selection of judges. in your opinion, is everything smooth with us now with these two issues with the nabu competition and the competition a member of susu, uh, there is some kind of commission, we know all the names, it is moving. somewhere in the next week or two, the beginning of the collection of documents from candidates will be announced, that is, to be honest with you, i am calm so far, there was one attempt by the authorities and to make the contest controlled not by the authorities but by a part of the ruling team. it seems to me from what i see in the field that the president hit the nail on the head and this story was laid there. international partners and the media got involved. the president got involved. i was forced to get involved. the law about which they seem to regulate this procedure for the election of judges, the draft law, i apologize in the store, what is the problem with this

draft law, ah, it is not bad, well, it is not bad, that is, it is 100% better than now. simply the european union will assess whether we have fulfilled this point based on whether the adopted law will meet the recommendations of the nazi commission, the conclusion of the committee on the integration of ukraine into the european union regarding this draft law, the draft law does not contradict international legal obligations in the field of european integration, i sincerely from our committee to the european union judges, our committee, i'm sorry, our committee is much less important than the venice commission, the venice commission directly said that the conclusion should be involved, uh, civil society. it's just there was a tool of er-e grd of public integrity involved in the competition commission should be if it was recommended because i looked at the conclusion of the nazi commission and they use such phrases could also include and also you can also use the

experience well, look at me it would be better to include this recommendation in one form or another so as not to open a discussion, because when you open a discussion, a field is created for opponents. my advice would be not to create, in principle, a forum for discussions against our european integration. the parliament is obliged to implement this recommendation of bograd to the letter, that is, the authority of these people is over. well, i would take into account some forms and we gave several options for the president's office for the parliament. how can it be done? my advice is to take it into account in one way or another. it has been since the adoption of a law allowing the confiscation of the property of russian oligarchs located in ukraine, however , we heard about the first such decision at the beginning of september, when the higher e-e anti-corruption court passed

the decision to confiscate the assets of yeftushinkov, one of the richest people in russia, why do we continue to stay awake at night about high-profile cases regarding the confiscation of assets, in what month is the full-scale war between russia and ukraine ? see, i am an optimist. society , society, media, western apartments began to be written, waiting for these cases. not waiting for the appropriate decisions to be made, they began to ask the authorities. and where are the friends, and since last friday, the national security council adopted the first, well, adopted a large package of such sanctions tells us about 1,300 subjects, among whom are russian oligarchs, who own a lot of property, fridbenderibaska, the forests are many, not all of them, but the majority, eh, what is the truth, well, sources tell me that it is really true, then we are waiting

for a presidential decree that will introduce a decision the nsdc will be in effect , it will be just then. well, maybe the end of this week, maybe the beginning of the next. well, here it will be after that. the ministry of justice. let's go. and the corruption court takes away property. and there is property if i turned it on, when i turned it on, everything is turned on. that's about 2.5- 2 billion dollars, that is, this process has begun, we will see which one is the president, because the names will be clear. well, we are confirmed by all parties that the most interesting under sanctions is the first step , because 2 billion is a lot in the usa, there are 300 billion for which we have to fight, but between these 300 billion and two billion, because it is 300 billion, it is the sovereign money of russia, it will be difficult to deal with it, we need it, it will be really difficult to take it, among them is the property of russian oligarchs in the west, private property that god himself ordered to take away, and one of the main beliefs

in our advocacy, there were friends at the event to take away this property. well, you take it from yourself. so you take it from yourself first. and then tell us about it. thank god, this takeover has begun. if everything goes well , we expect that the lawsuits in the anti-corruption court will be filed in a month, in a month. there are still 20 days of development, 30 is two months, we will have a shaft of confiscated property, and having these information devices, we returned to the discussion with our western friends in the eighth month of the war, whether there will be anything to confiscate, considering the fact that quite a lot russian oligarchs had time to decide what to do with the assets that are in ukraine, this is a great question, and with this question, we forced the authorities to move further in this process, because i also don't understand why it took so long for the law that is

allowed to be done is the fifth the fifth month during this time, the subjects of the sbu national bank, the president's office, the verkhovna rada, the cabinet of ministers did not rush with this story, because who to submit had already been done, the analysis was conducted legally, they did not submit, did they submit at the end, or during this time, the assets could murayev's assets could change owners, they changed a few more, we already see them changing, but here it will be difficult to catch up, but the optimist will take a lot. well, we wrote down which assets we found, which changed the owner, and we will ask these four subjects about what happened and in general, how much time do we have to pass from the

moment, let's say, when the decision was made by the court, and the court was not the court before these resources, these collectives, will get to the ukrainian question tanya, what is the logic of the court saying we take it away after this cabinet of ministers determines who deals with the assets, it may not be a specialized agency, we have an agency for the management of seized property, yes. what a lot of problems, a lot of problems. i would n't give them the property. state property, which was headed by a panomer and for which i have great respect and whose results say that it seems to me that we can effectively manage what with this property depends on the property, on the asset, for example the huge ocean plaza in kyiv, where the lease has already been bought, where the constant profit is already dripping, it is opening something the other day, literally, if they will sell me a longer story. well, because it is necessary

. missed logistical needs saved on the seventh won the war sold the manager's wisdom here and i would not give the army 100%. it will be a separate communication with the cabinet, don't give the army, give the army to the foundation. this is this management agency seized property, because it is just an army. and it will be the same as from lviv. it is science to me since the beginning of the full-scale invasion on february 24. as of the beginning of september, ukraine has already received international aid for 17 and a half billion billion dollars, and we understand that this is not the end, in your opinion, how effective is the control over the use of this aid now? a good

question: historically, as an organization, we have difficult relations with any government. the institutional function, from what we see now, i will be as frank as possible. the government does not steal from the budget, because 60% of it is formed by western money . there is an understanding that if they started stealing here now, then we simply will not keep western money, and without this money, there is nothing for it. to pay military salaries to anyone. that is, it is money that allows us to live and fight. does this mean that they do not steal? no, it does not mean that he is trying to form parallel financial flows so that they can be dispersed in some way. but the most important thing is the large schemes of theft from the budget which the form that is filled with western dollars does not exist

at the highest level at the highest level we are talking now about shallow ones there will always be a lot of them and this is good news this means that in the political elite at least in key people i understand what cannot be done parallel streams make delivery systemic, i say so, they have not yet become systemic, but they tend in that direction, i have a request for a political friend, stop here, i’m not even talking about some valuable stories, you can’t explain the congressman who gave this money was stolen well, not exactly from the budget, this is a cough generated by a state enterprise, part of which is not owned by the state, you are stealing from yourself, that is why, friends, i am begging you directly, do not do this, it is not necessary but i will emphasize

once again that these stories are not systemic now and this is a good signal, in your opinion, and what means of control can be used here? well, i mean that parliamentary control can be strengthened, it is possible to strengthen public control, and give more powers specifically to civil society for control over this money is possible western control, let's talk together about what control civil society knows in the media and in the law enforcement system, we see a crime committed, civil society sees in any case what is happening on the ground and i don't mind what when we already see crime is a problem because we saw it, we should talk about it and not implement it, and it affects the country, what can be done in order to use these powers to prevent this crime as much as possible

frankly, this is our long-standing discussion about the format of the security service of ukraine, why in its current format the service is not effective because it combines two functions with different worldviews, they are law enforcement officers and special services, and there is a worldview difference between them. in our situation, it is already too late, because the crimes have become a scandal for the whole world, the special service works to prevent crime, they are at the level of having planned the crime, but this work is not being done, but it should be reform of the sbu was needed two years before the war, when he talked about it, they quarreled with the authorities. this is how they should have been, how about me, it will probably be like this. especially in a country that is at war with italy, forgive me for calling you that, but you are, in a certain way, like that for me

horseman of the apocalypse in the fight against corruption riding on the anti-corruption center and how did you get to the point that you are fighting corruption, what prompted you to do it? it's been a long time, i didn't plan such a value and discussion. in short, no one planned anything, i didn't plan be i worked as a tv presenter for a long time in ukrainian politics as a consultant, and while working, we bring down deputies, helping them actually in how to convert political influence into real changes in that work, i saw that in ukraine there is corruption in all countries, this is true even in the usa, it is simply somewhere, it is an exception in ukraine it was not just a rule , but a goal with the means of politics. politics was for the sake of corruption and a way of corruption in such a history of the country, it did not survive, well, effectively and it will not be exactly. well,

it so happened that i understood that part of the implementation my vocation, why i am here, why i live, is to work in this field. in short, i did not plan. i well understood how difficult a task it would be, because i was inside the process. i saw how it was all built . in the 13th year, at the beginning of the 13th year, cases were initiated against the peckish people against the peckish people at that time in austria. i understand that in our country they did not kill the only one that they did not understand . revolution of dignity and i flashed everything i understand that you are not going to leave this battlefield yet. good evening. we are from ukraine. vasyl zima's big broadcast. my name is zima. two hours

of airtime and my colleagues will talk with you until 21:00 for two hours of your time. we will talk about the most important thing for two hours to find out about the war , our broadcast serhiy zgoretska military summaries of the day and what is the world like? what in the world will yury the physicist tell about two more hours to be aware of the economic news of the radio operators oleksandr frowns he talks about the economy during the war and new sports yevgen pastukhov is ready talk about sports for 2 hours in the company of your favorite presenters about culture during the war, lina is ready to talk or something else that many people have become like, maybe the weather will give us some optimism, nice natalka didenko is ready to tell us, and we will also have distinguished guests of the studio today , volodymyr ogrysko, if everything it will be good, the events of the day in two hours, vasyl's big broadcast, winter, a project for intelligent and caring people, in the evening, nayspresso, good evening, we are from ukraine, politics, economy, culture

, sports, technologies, this is what the news looked like until february 24 in 2022, today one topic is relevant: the war for the sake of information security and comprehensive coverage of the situation in the country. watch our espresso news channel and the espresso euro program for ukrainian refugees in europe. a joint broadcast with the atf channel. television news broadcasts bbc news ukraine and franz 24 as well as the broadcast of the information marathon the only news together we are the strength glory to ukraine oh in ukraine and volunteers everything is possible everything

they will find everyone they will feed everyone their tails they will save the house they will give to the airplanes they will collect for the doctors they will help the lullaby they will sing the foresters they will equip everyone they will hug them glory to ukraine to the whole world ukraine is glorified for the volunteer kind there is no translation all of ukraine thanks you this is my country my country it is different so harsh and magical and springs smell of flowers and grew her summer tastes the earth and brandy from the landlord but really bright and colorful my country in

my country unique and wonderful they give birth to colorful rainbows and you who covered yourself with a soft blanket dear child, you will always return your country home, i will not give it to anyone. greetings, dear tv viewers in ukraine, it is seven o'clock in the morning and the news editor is ready to tell about the most important thing. i will start with the situation in kharkiv