late at night it was broadcast and they watched and they didn't understand because you know how it was said first who posthumously and then immediately switched to who so uh and then they didn't understand the gist and started calling and crying what is that what what what happened to dimoy, that he was posthumously awarded? i said that it was not true, that he is alive and well, that he is seriously injured and is in the hospital. dmytro does not consider himself a hero, instead, he is proud of his older brother, who is also a military man, and as his brothers, i would like to remember the dead serhii kosenkov and serhii tymkova servicemen of my unit who died on the 24th and i would also like to express my

condolences to the families of those who died who gave their lives in this difficult war and thanks to their sacrifices we can now walk freely on our land and we will certainly win a great victory in this, senior lieutenant dmytro chabalakh does not doubt for a second, you understand, this war has been going on for too long, it has not been going on since february 24, and not since the 14th, it has been going on for hundreds of years, this time we have to give them e- is like that that is, they are just in the future, in 50 years, i stopped just because of the phrase of ukraine, they started to

shake them and take out their teeth. on this country of ours, which will be fast and i hope will not force itself to wait, faithful to ukraine gavrylyuk details tv channel inter only news unconquered cities of ukraine our ship capital is famous for its moorings bridges and happy brides the lands at the confluence of the ingula and the buska estuary have long been closely connected with the zaporizhzhya cossacks and for centuries formed a free ukrainian spirit to fight. the city named after

saint nicholas, the patron saint of sailors, has always courageously fought against enslavement, just as hitler's troops shamefully fled from mykolaiv during the second world war. fate awaits the other invaders who are now encroaching on the glorious ship shrine despite the constant shelling of mykolaiv, kordu is setting sails for the victory of ukraine unconquered my country this is my country, it was different, so harsh, charming in winter, and you don’t smell of flowers and growth and cheese from the landlord, but really bright and colorful, my country is

unique and wonderful in my countries, they give birth to a rainbow of colors, this is my dragobrat in the spring, pip ivan, who covered himself with a blanket m "where have you not been, always on the internet, home, my ukraine, i will not give it to anyone , even if there are ruins here, we will not leave here, this is our earthmoving machines with plates, children with white flags shot at our houses, a lot of water, families died, wild people, proudly liberated from everything, planes flew in and began to bomb, well , you are a plane, a documentary film, a lost home, on

wednesday at 21:30 in marathon, the only news, congratulations, you are watching the marathon, the only news on the air, the intera information service, my name is oleksiy fadeev , october 7th was the anniversary of a person whom most ukrainians would hardly call a person his birthday was celebrated by vladimir putin, the president of russia, a tyrant , a war criminal, an instigator of war, and well, i will not say this word, i have been forbidden to use it for the time being, and from all ukrainians from here to him the ill health of a quick defeat and a long painful death or, even better, life imprisonment as they say in odesa for 120 years, today we say a clear thing about the dictators of the dictatorship and about how and

with what any dictatorship ends, although this is already known from culture, history, our guests today are political scientist mykola davydyuk and good day good evening and expert valentin klapkikh good evening p mykola p valentin i congratulate you so whether putin is a tyrant or not and why, if so, a person is even a question that is not subject to discussion, the question when this is a sign of when this taran will take responsibility and responsibility. as far as i know, one of the secret red lines that putin asked in the west not to call him hitler, not to compare him with hitler, and the second is not to call russia a state. terrorist that is, this is what he is really afraid of and this is exactly what we as a state must put pressure on, and it seems to me that the fear of any tyrant is clearly that it is to fall, to fly down, that is why he has this whole environment

. after all, they are old people what are these dreamers they are definitely not capable of anything there, he specially selects them because he is afraid that for all these crimes that he has committed in 22 years, well, first of all, the most important thing is that he will have to answer for war crimes in ukraine. reminds me that presidents do not bear any responsibility for their activities, and that is why he does not want to go anywhere because of this, and he travels very little. he does not go anywhere . some politicians are saying what happened to muammar gaddafi, what happened to sadim hussein, what happened to all of bin laden and many others, that is, by and large , this is the 70th anniversary. - not the prehistoric characters i just talked about. and why do you think he insists so much that he not be called a battering ram dictator and so on and russia and ukraine a terrorist - this is the same

mechanism through which you know alcoholics they force me to say good evening, my name is that and i mean an alcoholic, it's the same thing. i think it's an inner fear to finish, just like gaddafi, like bin laden, to finish like other dictators, so he's afraid of it very much, he started on this path, but i think he will be an exception but in fact putin was never excluded. so, for example, in his position he will clearly be like nikolaev ii, he will definitely be like a hillock, he will collapse russia in the same way, and he will end it just like these uh, after leaving the house of the dictator, who just later caught up with death or the guillotine or the protesters who were shot on the street or there, uh, the shooting, that is, in the grand scheme of things, there is nothing that distinguishes him from mykolai chauchevskiy, the only question is whether the international international court will do it . yes, which a-a died under the blows of the crowd by the natural force of which he always as he wrote his own means where he is there in the green book or

where a is always in the constitution p valentin and how will they finish putin in your opinion well, he will die no for sure, we will all die, some sooner, some later, by a sudden death or, er, in life imprisonment in a cell, and i'm afraid that it doesn't matter by and large, because he now basically has two options. well, option number 1, which he is currently trying to realize efforts to avoid punishment well, that is, roughly speaking, like a criminal who once did not commit a crime and then hides all his life because he is afraid of being exposed and brought to justice

there is no statute of limitations for crimes and you crimes against humanity well, that is why he will try in every way to simply avoid punishment and prosecution , although as a matter of fact, we perfectly understand that he has already been prosecuted and everything and the totality of steps taken by the international community, the civilized world in relation to him, this is also can be considered a certain disciplinary act, this is one moment, and his second option is to be arrested and punished. well, there is already a space of options , and yes, he is punished in what way. well, he can the prisoner may be executed, maybe he will die somewhere there, maybe the subject will be there, i don't know, there will be international bodies of justice, maybe the subject will be some people from his own environment, maybe some there, i don't know, eh, really, it's not predictable , spontaneous eh events will take place well, but in principle , that is, there is no turning back, as it were, in the past

well, that is, he will never regain even that ghostly, it is illusory, status of a person who in the world, if not approved there, at least accepted yes, with whom at least they talked, well with him there is nothing to talk about. what happened when zelenskyi said that we are ready to talk with russia, but not with putin, because putin's regime, well, for us, it is not accepted there, not only because we like it or not, but because he it's just that he's the one with whom you can't agree on anything, just like this guy said that well, if there's a hungry crocodile that wants to eat you, what do you want to negotiate with him? well, he has manifesto interests and all these conversations of theirs give us something to talk about which are now being heard more and more often, they are absolutely nowhere well, therefore, it is not only zelenskyi's opposition, we understand that in fact

the same position is supported by a large number of others. look who congratulated putin today. well , there is not one, i would say. on the political board, which would be a figure and not a pawn, i don't want to humiliate those states no heads that are there, but we must understand perfectly well that we still understand that they are dependent to one degree or another from the position of well this character or them was simply ideologically close, that is, it looks like a crow, a crow, as they say, a fool, a fool, move away from afar , they are basically tyrants and tyrants, they are also inclined to unite that's why the future is already clear in principle, and you know, i don't even have the sense to discuss it well, how right mykola said, well, this is the destination, in principle , they understood it so absolutely, and places in history, by the way . history will one day have a place in history next to

hitler. no, it will be even worse. you know, hitler is stronger than putin. decision, he removed the responsibility of the judges from the officers who should have done it, and then he is afraid of it. similarly, why is germany the loser, germany is stronger than the loser russia, germany came out honestly and said how much we should pay in reparations to remove this shame from ourselves for hundreds of years and tell them they tell us it takes 30 years, 50 years, but we will pay, pay. yes , russia is afraid, you understand, there are losers, strong ones, and there are geographical ones, in addition, germany has, as far as i know, what social programs are specifically for jews and this resettlement program and immigration support program so and so and so and so, this is just the difference between russia and germany between putin and hitler putin is no different in his string of war crimes no different at all no different from hitler similar people hate crimes

are just similar only he is did in the 21st century and we see it all, we see it, we see it, we see it in the cities of the zaporizhzhia region, the kharkiv region, the kherson region, people with golden crowns are just dumbfounded, i'm just a demonstration putinism as a philosophy, ideology, and putin as the leader of all this, british intelligence says that he himself gives orders to the generals, which means he himself is an accomplice and leader of precisely these crimes , so it is clear that he must answer for it unequivocally well, but there are intelligent dictators yes, for example, franco, who remained when in power, he switched to the side of the west and started to cooperate, then he returned the constitutional monarchy and died. putin will not think about it, did he have a chance, but all nuclear threats every day must lose every time another city another village the threat of nuclear weapons the threat of nuclear weapons therefore the world will no longer have the right to allow it to survive and this is very important but the world must be convinced and reminded because you

understand two or three statements of ilona mask and everyone is already thinking about something else and here it is very much in the time of the media manipulations to remind the truth who is a criminal who is a criminal who is a murderer who has shed the most blood in this century - it is putin and this list is not possible, it is not possible now, for example, there will be g20 in november, he cannot be allowed there, russia must be thrown out very interesting things to ukraine. he will go to the ball. as far as i understand, that's how he appears at it. the most he can go is just to burn himself there or go surfing. let him choose . 20 should be thrown out as their place in j8 and there are likely that i will just take it there, well, look, i think that there are no court decisions and sentences yet. that is, it is unlikely, again, uh, for now, they started talking about it. but i'm afraid, i'm afraid that not yet but throw it away with this one institution or 20 from the institution, we can and should

do it, or can we take their place, we can, again , this is not a purely economic block, where economies are measured, this is a political block, this is a political one, we can there should be 100%, how to apply, i absolutely support such a question, all the same after all, we are not only talking about the jubilee, but in general about the idea of ​​a tyrant, but it is interesting that you know 100% that not every dictator comes. like a dictator, lukashenko came in his time as a democratic young leader. he laid in the basement of the economic growth of this economic miracle what moment did putin become a dictator ? officials. i think that putin was a dictator. here

is this phrase. if you read the literature, here are all these oligarchs. yes, they chose him as a weak loser. and he still played there. oh, i don't want to. i don't know. it wasn't a game back then. he wanted to. to be, for example, i looked at old photos, he was already near gorbachev, he was hanging out there, he was wearing an umbrella , he was carrying a bag there, he had wanted it for a long time, he had been planning it for a long time, he had been planning it for a long time. here is this aggressiveness , it is in his blood, first of all, secondly, if you take his psychological a portrait, that's just a complex dictator, we're covering it, for example, in what did he want then, that is, in the axis, now they were called the soviet union, everyone was offended there, the humiliation of him in germany, that's it, that's all. he was gathering people who hate ukraine because of the freedom-loving ukrainians, this was all already then, so when he came in, he had to pretend to be such a weak kgbshn who could go there and be ruled by the oligarchs, but how

quickly he started killing them and taking away their property tv channels, this indicates that back. it was already then and again how many people disappeared out of several people killed , for example, uh, all these things. for example, there is a pelitkovskaya in the caucasus, a purely putin scenario after the politkovskaya, there is no information and but this was all planned for this as an example, and again, everyone had their own politkovska, they just don't talk about it, that's why i'm more than sure that he came in as a dictator, he was just playing the role of such a weak puppet in the hands of the oligarchs, but he definitely had a bloody dream about it my question is, of course, my paranoia now makes me ask, do you think, gentlemen, that putin is really so cunning and intelligent, that he maneuvered between all these figures and climbed the mountain through such cunning schemes, or was he just a protégé who got off the hook

and began to settle accounts with those who set him up, what do you think, which theory is more to your heart's content, what is it called here, it's not about theory, first of all, there is a lot of literature, yes, no i will answer for those who want to understand it easily and pleasantly for themselves, there is a cool series, well , a documentary back, it’s how to become a dictator or how to become a tyrant, everyone put it there, it’s just shorter and consider, er, some methodologies and methods, by the way , it doesn’t talk about putin well, when it was filmed it's just something different, if you actually compare north korea and russia, then there is a gap between them after that, even as of today. well, if you compare gaddafi and russia, there is also a gap between them, we may not like them. well, there is scientific honesty , just like that, and a gap of some kind fish - it's cultural, i don't know, civilizational, football, as a

conceptual well, because in russian, we can also describe the political regime as hybrid, yes, that is, authoritarian, i say yes, today it tends to be personalistic, according to which direction yes, today they are drifting in the direction of totalitarianism, that is, they are drifting, but at the moment we can not say that the russian political regime has become totalitarian, i think that the war and the declared mobilization have turned it into a totalitarian regime. well, again, returning to the film. well, okay, no, not the film, now our debts. but i think that these are precisely the elements of a totalitarian regime and, again, international war crimes , he is an international criminal. well, i think that even it's not important for us now it's important for us his punishment is whether he was a puppet or he was a puppet and then he became a bloody dictator i think that now it's not even fundamentally fundamentally responsibility for the 22nd year for the 14th year for the eighth year again, it is clear

that medvedev has a typical puppet of his puppets. in his hands, in whose years he started the annexation of georgia, it is also a story, but i think that after all he played a role. that's right, he wasn't there, he wasn't super strong, that is but he wanted it 100%, it can be seen from him that these plans are negative in relation to ukraine, they have always been, they have always been hatched in his head, and this hatred simply began to sprout when he realized that his time had come. he has such a fixation on ukraine, isn't it his personal fixation, it's a fixation, i don't know russian there at all, but the whole community is like that in ukraine well, simply, ukraine is ukraine, it's bad, that means nationalism is bad and so on and so on and ukrainians are not good here well, that is, we are talking about ukraine. this is a bad question, but who is good for russia? well, the georgians are

bad, that is, the baltic countries are bad, cuba is good. by the way, it is not bad, that is, in fact , it is necessary to understand that today the russian federation is supported by a lot of people. those political regimes that oppose the existing world order. well, that is why they are on the margins of this world order. moreover, they supported him to dictate it, but it is not about the architects of the current world order. yes, they are much stronger. therefore, this order is still maintained. because those who are in favor today are much stronger than those who are against. because those who are in favor today have created conditions that are acceptable and desirable for the lion's share of the population. i'm sorry , they are talking about a wild, uh, some kind of west, but for some reason money is kept in the west, for some reason they practice the western way of life, well, i mean, you

understand why it's something, patriarch kirill doesn't wear some kind of sundial, uh, to drive or how do we make him drive there, listen he to me everything let's talk like this, that is, the joke is that the classics of the genre are much easier to declare some principles of value than to implement them. well, this license, do they have these principles of inspection? in short, there is the search for pleasure, the cult of consumerism, that is, we are not, we are spiritual we have something there, but in reality, there is no meaning behind this rhetoric. this is a lie, that is, no more, no less. this is a lie. i understand the libs, at least there. i understand what was going on, that is, relatively speaking. there is power for certain reasons there is a certain type of consciousness and they try to implement it, but when you

say one thing to the other, namely, you live completely differently , well, this is absolutely conformative-contradiction, and what is this er-er called scientific language, so er-er, this regime well he er he is a stranger, you understand the point is that those er whose achievements he uses well he clearly opposes himself to them by his behavior and they do not perceive him because they understand that it is nothing more than mimicry and at the same time those to whom he appeals, and this is anti-western rhetoric, listen to his speech. it seems that putin is the leader of some vassal state that was extorted by white colonizers for 1,000 years, and he wants to do so, and he allegedly became real, that is, to fight against imperialism, but this clearly shows. yes, what kind of audience is he targeting? america is an empire, that the west is an

empire, insults on the market, they are justice, non-profit companies with their billion members , that is, everything else, that is, it is clear that i, this is a very important point, i want us to pay attention to it, that this rhetoric actually finds a response among certain people who do not understand very well what russia is, what france is, what england is, they understand because they had contact with them 150 years ago, yes, and 200 years ago there, 60 years ago, only there, the war in algeria ended not so long ago they still have a historical memory about it. and what russia did, they are not aware of , yes, that is, it is not clear to them, so they really remember these sentiments, in general, yes. that is , it is an anti-persian discourse and a worshipful study. they will grow up from marxism in in principle, so are we let's forget about it and let's not forget that a significant part of these african states gave their leaders where the processes of decolonization took place, they studied in moscow, well, moscow helped them fight against colonial enslavement, so it is clear

that they also have some historical memory, but they are simply confusing about the fact that the current moscow has nothing to do with that moscow. well, what exactly is the position of moscow? yes, it was an export position, that is, freeing the peoples of africa from colonial enslavement, they are not in a hurry to free their own peoples who live in this prison of peoples from colonial enslavement and there is one more nuance in contrast to european nations and imperial ones that have realized their future and this is all post-colonial studies. it is a product of western culture of western intellectual life , that is, when you you arrive in captivity in the united states of america, when there will be a so-called yes, and they increasingly tone it down, if not very much, because well, they realize what is the opening of america, that is, the leadership, that it is not an opening, so for some - it is one thing and for others there is a story now about the positions of different subjects, yes.

that is, this is a very important moment. of course not. look at the roots of the people's states and the indigenous peoples in russia, it's a chasm, so why am i doing all this? yes, these peoples also feel hypocrisy. do you think that when the taliban come to moscow, they really they believe that for them russia is their leader, their guide, or an institution, because it is as if they also remember that they had. well, in afghans, this is a long history of relations with russia, not only with the soviet union, but also before the soviet union and at dawn of the soviet union are also national, there are also enough studies, so it turns out that today russia has appeared in the corner film characteristic of strangers and strangers among their own, that is, on the one hand, you did not fit in here either, because you threw yourself out of here, roughly speaking

no one let you here. i'll tell you that they have a third way that exists. although i personally don't understand what the problem is, it can be categories and two words, in fact, two words, model, yes, yes , what's important is that it's really valentin hello. that the russians do not correspond to the values ​​declared by them. putin went to liberate ukraine from the fascists and was the first to start bombing russian cities and now continues zaporizhzhia kharkiv that is, where is the liberation of russian speakers even though kharkiv was a russian-speaking city and today we see millions of people who at one time they spoke in russian, they are switching to ukrainian and they say we want to be like the french, yes, maybe the first days we will speak not so well in ukrainian, if we wanted to, but we will do it, and i will do it with many people who have there are mixed national roots, there are belarusians, kazakhs and armenians, but they all speak ukrainian, the russian language has become the language of hatred of murderers and torturers, this

is the first thing, the second thing, why is your question why is ukraine so important to putin, and then he believes in the eyes old philosophical dogmas written out, he sleeps and sees that there is no russian empire from kyiv, they built this myth of the russian empire, which does not actually exist. i am just a colonialist machine that attacked other countries during the donkey weakening of other empires, for example, all the muslim countries that russia conquered after the fall of the ottoman empire, they went and said we are liberating you from muslims, but some countries say the book muslims are well, we are seriously catching you. so you and the same and that's it after all, it is a demonstration that russia does not want to let ukraine go because everything is built around kyiv. kyiv is where we started, then we have 1,000 years, yes, you don't have thousands of years. take a calculator and count, but if they think that the beginning is from kyiv , then it should not be the root for them. we say we don't want to be like this, you're not worse, our startup

wait, it's you, it's an invention, er, i forgot the name, er, look, these are the royal philosophers who drew up all the strategies of russian statehood, and here they are written, and putin believes it, plus these western eyes mesed that russia without ukraine is not a european state. putin is afraid to go to asia. putin is afraid because he understands that he will be torn to pieces there by dictators just as obsessed as he is. he wants to be a dictator in the european or western space, where the law is respected, and he wants to be the only brutal speaker's doormat, all because he understands that between tajikistan, china and pakistan, he will sweep the yard and he understands that, and that's why where there are no laws, he wants to be allowed this manifesto literally this there was a phrase manifesto and i absolutely and for a very long time consider panov to be simply zero at first, what do you remember, brother two, the movie so what was it