criminal special un a few weeks ago, he reminded me very much of the speech of the kaddas in 2009. two years later, gaddafi was simply torn apart and hanged, why the property of the countrymen of the steppe, not the un? -e mutiny about christ's march from the west against the russian federation, that is, if instead of not all of them say libya, then it will be a one-on-one candidate's speech, volodymyr, a very technical question. well, let's imagine cards, i just want to imagine this picture. because such a picture has not been created since 1945, we can imagine that they vote in the security council and in the general assembly and exclude russia, and the russian

representative comes to the building of the organization of different nations in new york, what's in this in this case, the security just receives an order from the general secretary not to let in and that's the end of the whole story, how will it be, well, i'd really like to see it. by the way, i'll be honest, mr. volodymyrenko, you know, although it looks quite fantastic, but technically it's quite it's easy to do, and for this we need to question the authority of the russian delegation , uh, today, eh. by the way, in this connection, i would highly recommend you and the audience to read an article that seems to me, eh, today or yesterday, appeared in the edition of kyiv ndp it was written by my good friend dmytro longopolyi, who worked for more than 40 years. it's five years.

now he's already retired . that it looks funny and strange but after putin signed that series of decrees, well, other than fooling around, i won’t call them about the annexation, about the zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant, the control of the russian federation, that is, if you read these decrees, it’s just abstract, purely from a legal point of view. it is about the fact that the russian federation as a country today has completely changed its borders, which, by the way, it does not control. i mean part of the seizure of ukraine, including crimea. by the way, a

question arises if you read the un charter, there are several articles it is said that what is from the legal personality of the state, that is, what is considered a state, there are borders, control over the territory. by the way, i have a metal question: which russian federation controls the entire territory of its state, which putin declared, including parts of the kherson and zaporizhzhia regions, as well as donetsk and luhansk regions, they clearly do not control, which means that way any lawyer will have a question, including lawyers who sit in the committee on authority issues, how business is going and whether the delegation of russia, which was 8 months ago and the powers of which were recognized during the last

session, even today this delegation already has powers on this issue. you can still go back to consider this issue and deprive the russian delegation of powers, and then it will be warm that you say that the un guard, gentlemen, retires to the house , the headquarters, the apartment of derbilization simply not let it be because he will have an instruction that there is a decision of the committee on powers that er, sorry, your delegation er has no powers, its powers are not recognized by the general secretariat. i say it again, it looks like quite yes, it's even fantastically difficult, but if this issue is to be dealt with in a very real way, it is possible to implement it. i think that our diplomats are no longer engaged in this. listen, i'm just glad that i had a conversation with you today, mr. volodymyr, and i

'm glad that people heard your think about your knowledge and people. now they understand that diplomacy is a super warehouse , history, what are all these roads, what algorithms, and we serve, looked into this diplomatic kitchen. volodymyr yelchenko, permanent representative of ukraine at the un for 15-19 years and extremely my plenipotentiary post of ukraine in communication for 20-21 years, who was with us and everyone can only say to continue writing questions if you have any other questions, why am i happy or because today i have something i found out that today is really a bad thing. liquidation of poverty. all the participants of today's program came out. first of all, it is vadym chernysh and andriy ryzhenko. and

now we see volodymyr yelchenko, who explained to us how it is possible to blow up bridges . to do with the crimea with the naval unit and what to do with russia in the organization of guilty nations it was such and such textbooks we had a meeting today on sunday and now i am gradually moving on to answering the questions i hope there will be enough time i promised 4:40 p.m. to start you see it starts at 4 p.m. :35 and 37 seconds, you may be lucky and if there are any questions, you can bring them right here, we won’t disturb anything, because you see, they brought me coffee, they brought tea , and they were afraid to go on the air, these are such atavisms of soviet television, i never saw a problem in order to bring a person tea or some new documents, new knowledge, something may happen in the

world now, and it is necessary to inform about it urgently, well, go to work, what future do you see, this is ivan stepanovich, the future of russia, the russians, when should we wait for the collapse of the empire, who will blow the final whistle, and in game because of the russian federation so i can here the answer is very simple the russians will do it no one else destroys the empire empire usually develops from the middle there may be external pressure there may be a victory of the ukrainian army may be the victory of some sanctions we just talked with the bad vladimir yelchenko there may be a victory at the diplomatic level but without haha ​​i apologize without it being some kind of elite or non-elite elite or non-elite mutiny revolution or some

superficial revolution without this nothing will happen someone has to defeat putin whether inside or in his surroundings and er start peace negotiations with the world not with ukraine, but with the world ukraine can play a very important role there. the world and little by little it will all change , and we don't know how we will do it, we don't know now, it's the first, the second, we, i don't have the conviction that the collapse of the empire is possible, i don't have such a conviction, i do n't like to pass off wishful thinking as reality in my programs and in our programs with angelika and vitalik, we discussed

that if you count the subjects of the federation and in russia, there are somewhere under 90, then only in ten of them do national groups prevail over russians, for example, in yakutia there are more corners than russian yes, there are many more chechens than russians in chechnya. and in the 1980s, there are about 80 more russians. where will they fall apart? economists tell me that they will fall apart not because of ethnic, but because of economic, financial and economic problems . here i can agree, but this it is a very difficult path , you understand, you have to break up inside, you are a russian, on the one hand, you are for a great russia, believe that the russians will be against a great russia , it is difficult for me to imagine, but you want to eat, and

the so-called national minorities can provide you with food who make up the national majority in this region somehow they can do it i don't know, well let's say conditionally that in tatarstan i don't remember i won't lie i don't know are there more wallachian tatars there or are there more russians but let's assume there is a big problem with the russian economy, the situation will change sooner or later, for example, such a country as turkey says that we will help our brothers, the turkic people, yes, or until then, ukraine will be liberated from russia, and the crimean tatars will rule in crimea, we will help our brothers, and then russians who sit in the kazania and want to eat say, oh damn, listen, we need to disconnect, then we will eat something. i am exaggerating, i say this is absolutely such a vulgarized picture of the world, that is, it is simplified,

but such and such, such and such an option is possible, not ethnic, but economic, what is the reason such inhuman cruelty of the russians, because it is not normal to do what they do. are they really the descendants of adgophages ? i don't know what that is. back into history, we will study it meticulously and study the history of russia, which has not been studied at all, it is all solid, absolutely many centuries-old lies, just lies on lies, no such desperately great victories, no such peace-making places. how is this voluntary joining

? voluntarily, everything was so nice to us, we wanted everything to us, and we never started aggressive wars. look at the moscow kingdom of the 17th century and look at the moscow kingdom now, even now i am not talking about the rain in 1917, it already included this russia and finland and poland and so on and so on and the like and the baltics, so somehow it was like that, it became like that . and they said we want to go to russia, we can't even live, we can't even eat, we can't drink, that's why it's all a lie, that's why it's hard to go there, it's hard to find literature, it's hard to find literature, literature is primarily soviet, and they reprinted

it, did they mean pre-revolutionary ? the revolution of the 17th year centuries ago, all this exists and must be studied, and i have the impression that somewhere there is a brake pedal so metaphysical and this pedal is constantly being pressed by someone in russia because the world is civilized yes, we too we were all barbarians and there was a middle ages and there was a post-medieval period, some processes took place from this barbarism to civilization, and many countries passed, some surprise us, some do not, but they went some way and, well, slavery, well, somehow they decided that it was ineffective, not even because it is not human. well not effective, when everyone had already forgotten about

slavery, russia suddenly said in 1861, "we are finally freeing the slaves, well, it's absurd, you know, that's what people did 100 years before that, 200 years before that, 300 years before that, you have to study this and that behavior just like that, you you say not human, well , read four as how people behaved in the 14th in the years 13-15, roughly like the russians today , humanity had to go through many sides to come to the point that it cannot behave like this. and the impression is that the russians remained in the 13 14-15 a century ago, there were no saints, for god's sake, life was like this, everyone worked, i often get angry with my friends who consider me a salesman when i say, listen, the cossacks behaved like average europeans, and average europeans did not

behave like modern average europeans . to the predictions of astrologers, some fortune-tellers predict the use of nuclear weapons. i have a double attitude towards the islands. i don't know how to treat them, you know, on the one hand, i will try very hard approach this carefully. well, you and i know. i think that we know for sure, but i still have questions. don't hide. it's all work . back then, when no one knew such a word in the soviet union. you see how the old man is. i remember it very well. one of my acquaintances

was talking about astrology and i said. well, it's somehow strange. and that is, the people of the theory of physicists, that is man is maximally material, maximally we are not metaphysically, he is not a humanitarian, where emotions often rule, and physics is not ruled by emotion, reason, and he tells me that everyone knows that there are tides and low tides, and the sea approaches due to the influence of cosmic bodies on the sea and on the water of the cosmic bodies , the cosmic bodies somehow rotate there, it arises some kind of gravitation and this is how these processes happen. by the way, they are very interesting, eloquent, they are aesthetic. i have been to one of the places in western europe a couple of times. i will tell you where exactly you

can see that all this is real there. dozens or even hundreds meters, now if we remember where people come from here, i have to be very careful not to enter the territory. and when i am accused, or worse , the tv channel of some incorrect statement, if someone has children near the screens of small children, then let me start the book in the process of the birth of a child at the very beginning of this process, the process you remember it lasts nine months, so at the very beginning of this process, some part of the liquid penetrates from one person to another. now let's imagine that this is very little liquid, this is not an ocean

with tides and ebbs, i explain it as i need. the physicist explained this whole story about astrologers who look at the sky and calculate some kind of influence of this sky on you and me, so that if we think about the appearance of man, then we will understand that there is a probability that if heavenly bodies affect such volumes of liquid as the pacific ocean, but such volumes of liquid that arise as a result of love do not affect them. well, it's somehow strange, so it can be, but on the other hand, i don't really believe it, because scientists somehow have n't proven it yet, and i'm somehow a scientist trust maybe because in i have a defect. my father will leave the kingdom of heaven. he was an academician. and these are such people and inhumanities, by the way,

these are people who rely on facts, so i am so used to relying on facts . i won't say lukashenka lukashenka is trying to maneuver. he has a very bad situation. i think he is more afraid than putin. although i apologize , putin is terribly afraid. but putin still has a huge country, nuclear weapons, some kind of economy. some oil, some gas, some gold, some diamonds , some agricultural opportunities, agricultural borders with different countries , relations with different countries. putin will give someone, if he stays, if

they allow, there will be supplies. and if his successors, then when they go there, by the way, there will be a lot of controversy, the first will be yanukovych lukashenko, i don't know, but it's hard for him, but he has to show putin that i'm your bourgeois, and on the other hand, congratulate ukraine on independence day. well, in short, this is the story of three books that influenced your worldview and i would advise those who want to understand it to start what is happening around it is impossible to understand what is happening around mr. andrii if you do not have such a trait that in russian sounds like люба знательная есть люба питтства these are two traits these traits show whether this person is whether or not he is a journalist is a journalist simply

by himself and no one is forcing him, vitaliy and i talked about it right here on this chair , he was sitting and i was also sitting and that this is a person who wakes up in the morning, no one is standing over him, no one is hitting him a stick on the head and there is no responsibility that oh, i have air i have to read something next if i don't have air i am something even if i am sick when i don't read i feel bad when i don't read i don't learn i do n't call i don't clarify i don't get new knowledge why today's program i am personally satisfied with that that i will get some new knowledge, yes, and the goal of journalism is, correctly, that you know less about any journalist before the program than after. but the scandals continued, you don’t get anything. and you know one thing before the program, and after

the program, something flew into you head ears eyes and so on and so on and so on and so on if and so journalism is to a certain extent a creative profession , only a person who carries this gene in himself, then in the cell and curiosity, she will be a journalist, moreover, not only a journalist, any lawyer for him it's interesting how to protect a person a doctor how to research a disease there an investigator how to find a criminal anyone listen to the cleaner how better to clean the premises or the street well that's all three books when i was little i loved athos in the three musketeers when i got a little older but

that's all i was still 15 years old. maybe i read the evening of byzantium, then in russian, then in ukrainian, there were almost no western books, such an irwin show, a brilliant biliterist, absolutely, he wrote such a book. well, he has a whole series of books there were novels. and i would really like byzantium in the evening, and i won’t name the third one, because it ’s a whole list. great knowledge about russia so that someone would ask why they are such beasts. then read dostoyevsky, then you will understand

why they are such beasts, analyze dostoyevsky, it’s just uh, it’s what shows a russian, it’s very important. i think so, why aren’t ukrainians in crimea they vote for 8 years, almost only crimean tatars are arrested, searched, they go to protests, ukrainians are silent, did they leave the peninsula or migrated under the occupiers, what part left the peninsula, and the majority, i think, ruled under the occupiers, and well, you know that when you have crimean people nearby the tatars have no one to imitate , they are on the verge of destroying the russians , it is much easier to shut up a ukrainian because there is a huge country nearby, with a population of forty million people, it

is called ukraine, and he can sit there for a while keep quiet and then the ukrainians will still return to the territory of the crimea or then the ukrainians will be able to leave the cream on the territory of a large country and that's all and there is no danger . exit and they therefore pose a greater threat to the russians. and therefore the fsb hunts them much more intensively. maybe there are some ukrainians there who also cast some votes there, but they are not paid attention to because we are not one nation. you forget the fsb shields putin and putin says one people and the crimean tatars are another people, oh ludmila, shouldn't we copy the experience of the israeli army, make it mandatory for women to serve in it and

give preferences to all who have served, like free education above yes, there is such a version that ukraine can to become something between switzerland and israel. i don't mind. i've been to switzerland and israel many times. i really like many things, but what i remember from that time is that there is no tracing paper. if they take everything from the jews and implement it here in ukraine, they will still make their own accents, their own moments, their own road maps. that is, it will still not be israeli or swiss. whether it is any, it will still be ukrainian, but we will then thank her with a swiss canton and to the state of israel, if they really become such an example for us, but if that happens, then this question

is not a question of jeans, it is not a question of jeans, the question is that every ukrainian, like every swiss, from a certain age goes to study once a year and where state-of-the-art training and weapons in hand in uniform, such people leave training grounds and go to some fields. they continue there, you know, for 10-12 days. everyone studies for 10-12 days. there is one of the versions. they say that because of money hitler did not attack switzerland. attacked switzerland not because of the money lying in swiss banks, they explained to him that the whole of switzerland stands up, takes up arms and fights, and the losses of the germans may even be that the germans won as a result, but they would face such

losses that they would not be able to continue the war the germans, and that is why putin is speaking according to freud, and that is why hitler did not go to war on switzerland sharahnymi pakeshiv bridge, but there is a suspicion that probably ukraine has projectiles with a range or some means of delivery up to 300 km. i think that they are and i could be wrong, this is pure speculation, but i do not rule out that they are, but i just have a request washington and we should not resort to some well, until some time x i don't know how the destruction of the crimean

bridge will affect communication and relations between the top russian leadership well, we talked about it today, i think not everything will be fine they have a problem there, how unhappy putin's childhood called for an imprint for the rest of his life. if you believe the women's investigation, he has nice parents, his own mother refused him . holland in general, according to documentaries, is a very important country there, the biggest budgets are there, and they just researched putin’s pedigree. and it turned out that the mother really refused. some say there that his hatred of georgians also plays a big role precisely because his adoptive father was a georgian, who then persuaded him to have a real mother . she refused and took this volodya to leningrad. well, i don't know

whether it's true or not, but it's not laziness. how is it not linear? you understand there are people who had a very difficult childhood and became normal people. and there are people who had very difficult childhood and became serial killers or serial rapists . let's wait literally two 19 seconds and pass it on to eva melnyk and say happy birthday and happy birthday thank you oksana mykola thank you for a few news in a few minutes news