on wednesday, she plans to continue her studies and explore ukrainian culture yuliya kyzyk from sweden for the espresso tv channel france has transferred more than a thousand tons of aid to ukraine. this was reported in the office of the president of kyiv. pontoon bridges with a length of more than 200 m, this will allow to restore the civil infrastructure, ensure communication and transportation, in particular, in the de-occupied territories, this is what i had today in espresso editor's report read more about important things on our website espresso tv subscribe to our channels in social networks be close and see you tomorrow vietnamese balm star

the first step in the treatment of colds a proven medicine and not a cosmetic mixture we will be healthy ask at pharmacies in trust ethnic medicine only proven medicines events the most important events events that are happening right now and affect our lives of course the news feed reports about them, but little is known that what is happening must be understood antin borkovskyi and invitations experts soberly evaluate events analyze them modeling our near future every saturday at 1 pm and 0:0 with a repeat at 10 pm studio event with anton borkovsky naispresso join the

community with a ukrainian view of the world become a sponsor of the youtube channel espresso a is access to exclusive content personal thanks pinned comments special icons and the possibility of personal communication with the espresso team click sponsor and become part of the community with with a ukrainian point of view in the offensive and in the defense, day and night, they desperately and confidently swim the way to our victory, the tank troops, the pride of the armed forces of ukraine

, congratulations, friends on the air, the saturday polyclub program, angelica, the season, greetings to friends. so, today is enough of such a day for us. even the vast majority of colleagues are in white today, because the mood is really good , of course, because the crimean bridge is damaged, and today we will probably focus on what is the cause of this damage, why did it happen fire, what happened there? what mood prevails there among the residents of the peninsula occupied by russia? well, we will not only focus on this, of course we will talk about the resignation of the head of the national bank against the background of the war and about the new head of the financial structure of ukraine, and of course we have many topics of international topics . concern ukraine - these are the sanctions, the eighth package of sanctions introduced against the

russian federation. well, we can't help but mention the nobel peace prize, and of course we here think that we will study for a long time what happened on to the crimean bridge, what was this real? because you can see now there are just many versions, a huge number, what really caused all this to explode, how quickly they will be able to restore the infrastructure, because they are already the russians are reporting that railway traffic will be restored literally in a few hours, car traffic will also be restored in reverse mode, and then the question naturally arises as to how serious the infrastructural damage is and how much the destruction of this part of the crimean bridge can really be reduced the ability to transport military cargo is the most important thing. however, the precedent is no less important, that is, how could this even happen to the most regimented of the military facilities of the russian

federation. that is, this is such a carefully prepared operation, but again, if the ukrainian special services can do such operations are a matter for the russian special services in kyiv. you know they are talking about the fact that it really could be a struggle between the security forces. in russia itself, i also allow it. by the way, because these people are fighting each other as much as i am i remember the military or cysts or cysts for the spartaparats, a parade with the military. well, now that there is no parta-parade on the stage, the oligarchs have taken its place, and there is also a constant struggle between them, this is the second moment, the third moment, i can still hide it they don't want to tell you that you can fall into a situation related to some kind of falling into the crimea. well, in principle, we find ourselves again in this trap that vladimir putin somehow prepared for himself,

that on the one hand he annexed ukrainian territories to the russian federation, on the other hand, to lose these territories means to demonstrate all the incompetence of the russian occupation machine, to leave these territories is to allow the possibility of military action on mine, that is, us, on them, that is, on the territory of the russian federation itself. to be honest, i do not see a way out of this situation for putin, you named several versions, among which the involvement of the armed forces of ukraine directly in the damage to the sbu, another version is an internal showdown, because we now see how e.e. the head of e.e. the private city company of wagner prigozhin argues together with kadyrov and other elites, yes, russians, they protest against the ministry of defense, and the russian one. maybe they created something there. such dangers are strange. yes , prigozhin actually admits that he created a private

military company. in the russian army, there is a criminal punishment for participating in the creation in private military companies, i.e. if they really acted in russia, justice will come on the day when he created this private military company. well, no one has ever recognized at least the investigative committee the russian federation should have started an investigation. is there really a military company, what does it do for what money does it exist, what goals does it pursue, this actually means that there is a beautiful private army in russia. well, today he is a friend of putin and tomorrow there will be no road, the most important thing is that anyway, well, that is, you just come to some audience and say, yes, i killed these three people. and why did i want to, or did i steal the companies there because i decided that i needed it, and everyone says, well, okay, well, they killed, they killed. thank you sincerely, you can kill a patriot, and you can kill me too, well, in general, in this russian, i told the justice, there is something like that,

not even a healthy schizophrenic, but logically. and another version about the crimean bridge, which is not quite popular, but the defonian expression, which we respect very much, and they voiced that, in principle, seriously, here is this truck that was driving and that blew up, it could simply be with russian ammunition that was being transported to the south. and because of that, the expiration date has ended or because of some violation of the rules of transportation, they could simply explode and that's all, and they made such trouble for themselves. well, that's also a possible option, but i read that in principle, no truck can cause such damage when two piers of the bridge fall into the sea and that in order for the piers of the bridge to fall into the sea the explosive truck is not enough, the explosion of the fuel tanks of the railway is not enough, the canvas from this from the train that was going there, that in terms of the laws of elementary physics, the explosive must be laid all has a body of the bridge and then it can detonate, say

if she met that there are not enough of these missiles that could cause such damage, supposedly officially in ukraine there are none, but even if we had attacks and we tried to cause damage to the bridge, there is not enough, let's say, the volume of explosives, the volume of ignition from e -e rockets from being hit in order to create such damage is very interesting how did it happen, well on the other hand we can say that there will be many more interesting things in this story. i think that by the end we will find out about what is happening only uh when the war will end, the truth, that is, accurate information. i think that no one is interested in it. i am not interested in kyiv. because, well, why

do we, uh, we are not beautiful enough to go around showing off something, and moscow is not interested. how strange. well, what about moscow you yes. well, you really know the ukrainian troops. they blame the ukrainians, but somehow they can calmly destroy our crimean bridge and tomorrow the kremlin will blow them up. and what can i say? no, you know it’s beautiful, fighting him, that’s why he decided to blow up the crimean maskutin. well, it’s also very strange but what exactly are they saying that this truck was rigged with explosives, they say that it is ukrainian, some spies there did it and what about this person, who can’t explain, they say that someone died there people who were in a car next to the water of the truck well, really, why a person she sacrificed herself so that the bridge continued to work literally in a few hours, it is also very important that they do not want to ask questions, and at the same time the means of controlling the invasion of the occupied headquarters were strengthened more than they let a truck with

it didn't pass an x-ray with explosives. and why, well , that is, if this car didn't pass an x-ray today, it 's strange that it was blown up before that, it means some kind of agreement on the ground, possibly corrupt , let's say, you know. because then everyone else will be left without the substances he needs, and they are happy ot and zet gdanov, a crimean activist, performing the duties of permanent representative of the president of ukraine in crimea in 2018-2019 let's ask pdanova what he thinks will be the consequences of this undermining of greetings. so, the consequences, yes, so let's talk. so, we talked with angelica about the consequences, and we want to ask you, well, what will happen next? well,

first of all, i want to say that today was a very powerful gift for the house of an international terrorist for the international society of putin and i believe that this is the destruction of the myth about er such majesty of russia itself about the myths about the alleged annexation of crimea to russia, the first was a myth when it was sunk the flagship of the russian fleet is now uh- huh, the big structure is already unfit for use. and this is very good. everyone understands that crimea will definitely be de-occupied and we need to prepare for this, including our citizens in crimea . in principle, the fact that it was restored so quickly can be said in general that it is not a restoration and it is impossible to restore it so quickly

there are some canvases left on which you can move this is of course dangerous but they are capable of this in order to show that they are so fast and that's all everything will be normal and they will survive, as the commander in crimea said today. but it's good that they are on the ground and let them wait for us . kilometer-long queues from the very morning and for gasoline , first, then to the exit via land corridors, but on the other hand, the other part in social networks, you know, the heroes write but everything will be fine, nothing like this happened, the bridge will be restored and so on what do you know, i know that there is panic in crimea really long queues at gas stations , very long queues in stores, people are buying everything they can, and in fact, whoever wrote there that everything is

fine and everything will be restored, er, in fact, they also understand very well that er, de-occupation will soon be really there. how are you? in principle, what do you think is happening with the crimean tatar community in crimea? we heard that the crimean tatar community was killing the festive coffee this morning. fast they are waiting for us they are waiting for ukraine and they have been held hostage in the kremlin by the kremlin for more than 8 years and they are citizens of ukraine, they are holding on and protecting ukraine in the crimea and they will see the president's team in full when our armed forces of ukraine will pass e- half of the alleged so-called summonses were handed

to the crimean tatars. although if you look at the number of citizens in crimea and the relative number of crimean tatars in percentage terms, these are instrumental things, but really half of the summonses were was handed over by the crimean tatars in order to involve them in the war, but we clearly understand that there are almost no such crimean tatars who will really fight there. if there are, you can count it on the fingers, and others will also take all possible measures to ensure that they have mobilization. if it happens er, it will turn out that you mobilize them, they will come , they will surrender or they will go over, and of course they will surrender and go over to the side of ukraine as citizens of ukraine and also please tell me what you think about the reasons for this cotton on to the kerch bridge this morning, mr. vitaly and i listed several persons involved in this. but maybe you have your own versions. i

think it is inappropriate to comment now, and i think that the very fact of what happened is very beautiful and in accordance with international law. such an object as the crimean bridge, illegally built by the occupying country, is an object to be destroyed in accordance with the norms of international law, at least crimea is ukraine, it is our territory, what we want and do on our territory, well, it is obvious and what you see is that after the so -called annexation of these four ukrainian regions to russia, the issue of the sanctity of crimea has been removed from the agenda. it turns out that putin is not guided by sanctity, he takes everything that is bad, that is where he occupied, so they will not try to annex to annex, but i will return to the zsu and everything will be ukraine unequivocally kyiv activist

questions at the end of this topic, but still, what do you think about these threats? skabeeva started writing now. we will answer and all the other propagandists of the kremlin. well, what do we have to be afraid of, is there anything about these nuclear weapons? well, wait. i say it clearly all the time, listen. we cannot live in this paradigm, to which we are being pushed all the time, and they have been pushing us for a long time, what if we offend putin he will definitely respond with some kind of action. yes, i tell you for sure. angelica putin does not respond to anything. if he wants to use nuclear weapons, you can say that even if we sit under this table and do not get out, he will still strike if he does not agree decision on the use of nuclear weapons, we can come to moscow and there will be no nuclear weapons, and this is generally the soviet and now russian

decision-making system, it is different from the decision-making system of a democratic country, a democratic country responds to challenges, authoritarian countries create them, that is, first i am at a meeting if i putin makes the decision that i will attack ukraine, so it decided that we will attack it, then we instruct our referent and advisers so it was in the central committee of the cpsu so it was in the administration of the president of russia always find an excuse in order to justify our decision, well, let's say that the ghiter sent provocateurs disguised in polish uniforms to the german radio station. this was an excuse to attack poland. poland could have done nothing at all, she did nothing. they killed the germans in uniform, and that's exactly the case here. can we if we don't hit the crimean bridge? maybe he won't use, say, nuclear weapons there or not hit ukrainian structural

objects, then i'm asking you, he'll change his clothes himself russian soldiers in ukrainian uniforms, they will come to sell crimean vozz and blow it up under the cameras of the first channel, skabeeva will be standing there with a microphone, who will ask the russian soldier in ukrainian, you came here to kill ours, and he will say so. there is absolutely no need for putin because he only understands the language of power, but if we start living in a world where we cannot insult him or something else, we will drive wet code from ourselves because we cannot respond to it is more true, that is, when we are sitting under the sto crowbar and treasure because what can keep him from any decisions is the possibility of our reaction, so i can hit an infrastructure object, i will make such a decision, but i need to understand if there is putin, what will the consequences be the consequences

can allow me to look at the solution if you say it is reliable in what consequences, but they are sitting under the table, they are afraid, but they are afraid, well, logically. in you are there all the time to take money and so on and all the time you have to think about how to get around the gopnik somehow. do you take a brass knuckles with you or do you sign up for a course on answering various gopniks? i'm just an object. yes, he goes to at least another yard. well, he doesn't cling to you anymore, he appears in your yard like this. and here, too, we must realize that this is not political logic. we all time and this is the problem all the time, angelika, we try to think about putin from the point of view of political logic, and in politics, it really is, if you do not annoy your neighbor in a

democratic state, he will not do anything, at least he will try to come to an agreement with you it's like you said democratically look democratic leader even democratic leaders are conditional like orban they will still react and i'm not the first to provoke you and you in most cases because they think about the voters about their reaction she in any case they live in electoral states. and this is not an electoral state. the state is an autocrat. well, now we will talk about the internal ukrainian aspects of the situation. by the way, the long-awaited event was talked about even before the war, since the spring of 21st year, in fact, since the spring of 21st year, absolutely exactly why it was discussed for so long and only now happened, what at all what was happening was the last straw. well, i think

the appointment of an anti-corruption prosecutor took place, who finally stimulated a lot of cases. nabu, well , that is, nabu used to be certain, but they did not pass it on to the prosecutor's office. in the nabu and he is ready to promote the matter and that is why mr. shevchenko was suspected of things that became a reality even before he came to the national bank. that is, it is for his previous and since this suspicion is for the maidanchiva the chairman of the national bank of ukraine decided to file a bid to get rid of his health, but because of the destruction of his reputation, well, that is, it is not about his personal quality and not about conflicts with the president's office, about the fact that he was at the head, there should be a person who should inspire confidence in society correctly, i understand, well, there even by law it is written that there cannot be a person with an impure reputation, not a clear conscience, conditionally speaking, there

should be an impeccable reputation. and in fact, he had conflicts with the office even before the war, there were efforts put some pressure on the national bank. we read about these news all the way there. the national bank has been working for the past few years as an independent institution, but the only changes that have taken place are in the anti-corruption prosecutor's office, mr. serhiy. let's then summarize the pros and cons of his activity, because he had such a direct conflict with the ministry of finance constantly and they saw in different ways how to conduct monetary policy there, how to save ukraine during the war, and so on, and allegedly at first after february 24 a certain stabilization of their joint activities was contemplated, but in the end it resulted in his resignation. how do you analyze and summarize his activities? in no way did it turn out to be a resignation as a result of a conflict with the ministry of finance. the conflict of the national bank of the ministry of finance is quite

natural and it is embedded in the functionality of these institutions. therefore, it is normal when the national bank and the ministry of finance have different positions because they have different natures and this conflict should have existed , exists and will always exist in relation to how the work was performed by the national bank after the beginning war is a job for five of the pluses, we all now for the first time saw a very high-quality regulation of the banking system, the situation in the financial sector is much better than we could even dream at the beginning of the war, and now we saw a very correct reaction of the national bank to challenges and the result of those reforms that were carried out in the banking system after the maidan, the cleaning of the banking system, the creation of the same regulator, the result of gontareva's reforms, in fact, now we can see the quality of the financial system, so the national bank from 24 in february, he did an absolutely flawless job , in fact, it was a five with a plus, and here he can only be put down before the start of the war, the negative

was probably after the release from mali, although the release from smoli in itself was a time bomb that laid certain personnel conflicts because of these conflicts a lot quality people left the national bank, i can only hope that maybe some of them will now return and this was, of course, a negative element of his activity, yes, it was the result of his appointment, but after the war, the work of the national bank deserves only sheep, you said that it is normal between the ministry of finance and the national bank, and then whose side was the truth because they tried to pursue a somewhat different policy? well, first i started with regard to the emission of the hryvnia, there is no one here. the truth is that they have different tasks, that is why each of them is transport and when each of them is doing its job since it has to do, there will be a conflict, it is embedded in the very construction of the national bank, its main purpose is to fight the broadcast, the ministry of finance has to fill the budget

, and all wishes sometimes completely contradict each other because the higher the inflation, the easier it is for the ministry of finance to fill the budget. therefore, this is a very natural conflict, he does not demonstrate any personal relations, this is an institutionally natural conflict. they heard andriy pishny, who is now appointed head of the nbu, was considered a member of the team of the first post- maidan prime minister arseniy yatsenyuk, he was then the head of oschadbank of the country, he was considered one of such famous politicians of this generation, as far as we can now say that the appointment of the magnate will change the policy of the national bank, perhaps in the direction of more transparency, if you want politically. i hope that especially the policy of the national bank will not be changed, because the main risk is actually the same as always. it is the independence of the national bank. the only thing we can fear now is that as a result of certain appointments , this independence may decrease, and the influence of politicians

on the work of the national bank will increase. for example, we can see this on the example of turkey, where yardagan took control of the turkish central bank, as a result , he is conducting the wrong policy as he should conduct independent institute and the exact opposite and as a result inflation in turkey is already 83%. in ukraine during the war, it is now 22%. therefore, the main challenge is the challenge of independence and the main task for the magnificent is to defend this independence of the regulator as the resignation of the head of the nbu, in principle, we see that it did not particularly affect the cash market correctly, but they were still able to stabilize the future and in relation to international partners, for example, a predecessor shevchenko always tried very hard to show himself as a person who cooperates with the international monetary fund and can knock out for ukraine there is more help from bigger tranches, what can we say about the lush, see the national poppy can not knock out a tranche from the mv, this is a national bank,

really one of the main communicators, ah, shevchenko was also the person who was appointed, well, let's go, the release of smoliya violated our cooperation with the million currency fund for a very long time, and that is why he may have tried to communicate more. because it was his policy that depended on whether the imf would return to cooperation with ukraine or not in the future, ukraine, one way or another, is the best years of cooperation with the international monetary fund. i do not think that now the national bank will be its institution that will create problems in this cooperation. and i also think that mr. pishny perfectly understands the importance of this cooperation and will be its to defend at any levels and please tell me, sir, how do you imagine the hryvnia exchange rate and inflation in the near future, well, look at the inflation this year, we expect it to be somewhere at the level of 30% and next year, too, somewhere at the level of 30%. this is actually the main main the economic challenge is the rise in prices, which

can really be stopped. we cannot do anything about the exchange rate as long as the war continues, the pressure on national currencies will remain, and then everything depends on many factors, first of all, on the level of support from our western partners, if they will fully finance our needs which are in the money, relatively speaking, of the central bank did not fall to fully finance the budget deficit, and the national bank did not turn on the printing press at full capacity, so there will be some gradual slowdown of the game, however, again, there are no fundamental reasons for the fall of the hryvnia right now, but the pressure on the national currency will remain until the end of the person thank you thank you mr. andriy mr. sergey i apologize thank you mr. sergey for participating in our program serhiy fursy investment banker we talked with him about the resignation of the chairman of the national bank of ukraine. well, by the way, an interesting observation is that the resignation of the head of the nbu was called in connection with the appearance of an

anti-corruption prosecutor who started working by the way, this is something that many people feared . why did they delay this for so long? what if an anti-corruption prosecutor is appointed, in any case, the entire personnel policy will be changed because such a question arises. i am not even talking about the personality of mr. shevchenko and about the probability of the accusation against him must be proved by the court, but the question always arises. if such an accusation is not in mind, could he embrace the facade of the head of the nbu at the time because there was no anti-corruption prosecutor and they believed that he could it won’t be there in the coming years, so they wanted to hide something, they thought they could do without all these thermal and anti-corruption cases, or appoint whoever we want as corruptors. and you know how they once said in