otsypalsya a little bit came to us for a rally and again went to work ukrainian citizens who live in istanbul go to rallies every day, they are joined by those who do not agree with the policy of the kremlin in relation to ukraine muslims ernest sargalielov news on the public so take care, tell me honestly how are you how to be honest , it was not the best period in my life at the beginning of the war. i became very anxious and i do not trust people . i checked 10 times and closed the door. i often wake up in the middle of the night and cry every day. tears just help and you don't need to be afraid of being

ashamed of it. next time, try again like this from the palms of your hands, hooking your thumbs so that you have a calf. until you feel that your breathing has evened out, add this technique to your self-help first aid kit, more here is my country, this is my country , it was different, so harsh, charming in winter, and you don’t smell of flowers and grow white, summer tastes with a center and a berinda from the landlord, but

my country is really bright and colorful in the autumn, the dawn in my countries is unique and wonderful, they give birth to safety, colors, my country is dragobrat in the spring , who covered himself with a soft blanket, where you have not been, you will always return home to your country, i will not give it away no one has the rules of a warm country. this winter, not a single house is safe from the edge. the state and cities are doing everything possible to provide cheerful warmth. it is our job to preserve it . unite with neighbors. insulate your house and

your apartment. check the electrical wiring. take care. about alternative means of heating, draw up an action plan in an extreme situation, help each other , we will overcome the winter together. the government does not steal from the budget, because 60% of it is formed by western machines. there is an understanding that if we start stealing here now, then we simply will not keep money from the west, and without this money, there is no why pay military salaries to anyone? that is, it is the money that allows us to live and fight, mr. vitaly. good afternoon. i welcome you to the first channel of public broadcasting in lviv. you started one of the recent programs with these words.

of my posts on the facebook page, and as one of the commenters of the posts noted, i want to protest with these words to start the post, it's our time, it's possible to bring people to a heart attack. oh, this is a quote from your comments, oh, so which lviv did it refer to, god, how are you in this regard, lviv as a city at all, you won't believe it, i didn't think at all, that is, people thought, lord, i sincerely apologize to the reader. it's true, only now i understood what he meant, not the city of lviv, but lviv - this is not a judge, the highest judge in the economic judiciary of ukraine - this is the head of the former head of the economic cassation of the supreme court. that is, he is the highest judge who deals with property disputes, especially business disputes, which means that the chairman of the supreme court dismissed him and excluded him from the court, the question is closed. he is obviously a citizen of

the russian federation and obviously, he cannot be a judge, there are directly the norms of the constitution, as soon as a judge receives the citizenship of another country, he automatically loses, well, ceases to be a judge, and his colleagues from the commercial cassation should be thrown out 18 of people voted against the trio simply did not come secret voting secret voting and we do not know the names of these 18 out of a good 22 i think i voted for his exclusion, but at the same time you and i understand that half of the economic highest judicial branch of power in the institution of the page of power is fine with the fact that a citizen the russian federation was their leader. i turned to the judges who voted for his dismissal. friends, write publicly that it was you. it will be easier for us to count the others. they

will also lie, but we will compare and let's find out this story and about the sbu, please, friends. this is your job - it should not be done. i don't think that your colleagues, journalists, made this information public about citizenship, not the sbu, and i have a question for the officers, friends. obviously, it's yours, so it's easier to say it, yours, yours . if you say it is not a finalization, then finalize the 21 who defended him, because there is no motivation to defend him except for the fact that 18 defended the roses of the earth, well, it is the same in fact, that is, i am interested. well, there is a discussion , why did they do it? i do i don't think so. because it would be beneficial for corrupt officials to drain him. you drained him and diverted attention away from yourself. you left the bread place, the head of the grater. who is i

with ? where? what should happen next? is it possible to bring bohdan lviv to justice? what kind of responsibility should this be? this is a great question. why am i happy with the final for the semifinal in history because he was dismissed by the head of the supreme court ? it is necessary to understand, but the head of the supreme court, well , he made the obvious leadership according to the law, but he fired him. because if the chairman of the supreme court did not do this, then the supreme court could be crucified . the constitution on the constitution on the law of profilita and simonorma, but thank god the problem with his judiciary was solved inside the supreme court, that's all the court could do. thank god, we are moving on. i think the president should take it away from him citizenship, if the president had not previously taken away

the citizenship of communities from other citizens of ukraine with other citizenships. okay, that would be an option. well, because this is the first precedent, it is incomprehensible to take away not to take away , since the president took away the citizenship of similar situations. there is already experience. well, that's why you can't take it there and leave it here. it seems to me that the president i would not be in his place, i would wait until the petition gathers votes, there is quite a bit left. yes, i think. well, it's a matter of two or three days and then i think it would be right take away citizenship for a long time, but punish for, well, in fact, for entering unreliable data in the declaration, this is another word combination of information. you are right, this is a parallel track that nabu is currently engaged in regarding the actual failure to enter information in the declaration, and this is simply a separate criminal story already in the criminal process, but let's summarize lviv everything, that is, it already affects the topic of

bohdan lviv's tears, er, two things are important to me right now, half of the economic cassation. well, we understand that this is an inadequate story and they are there. it's up to the judges why is the commercial cassation so important, because it is the most important for business, because everyone has new disputes. that's where all the raiding takes place. that's where a little bit of cassation happens. so what kind of investor will come here to do something? that's why we need to deal with this, we need to clean up these guys, and secondly, the sbu should figure it out . of the russian federation, it is not the only one there and not only the supreme court, that is, if there is a hole there, it

can be assumed that it is in many places , that is why the sbu should repair the process so that it does not happen again and conduct a check on other officials. another interesting epic has ended at the end of july, almost two years with the appointment of the head of the specialized anti-corruption prosecutor's office, and i remember in one of the interviews with one of the publications, you put the responsibility for delaying this process on the head of the competition commission with the election of the head of sap kateryna koval and then you even had a post on social networks about the fact that we in the cpc, that is, in the center of anti-corruption , we will not forget you, ladies, when we forgot, we forgot , we had a fair war for six months. i feel like looking at who the whole lawyer is you earn by ordering services from her, we had to hmm find a way to find out who continues to order services from a person who has buried the reputation of the whole

country for 2 years. now, with your permission, there was a discussion about who is behind it. hmmm, i will say that the story is finished, thank god. thank god that we have an active and capable body and we are not asking the ukrainian authorities, let's not repeat the story with the anti-corruption bureau. and what should be done in order to avoid a repetition i am an optimist about such delays with tenders. in particular, we need to change the procedure in the law and it will be done. it seems to me that by the end of this year it will be one of the demands of our european partners. so i foresee a friend the story with the anti-corruption bureau is calmer there, because there is a commission of six people, not 11 - 6 of them, three internationals, that is half of the commission with an impeccable reputation and they have the predominant voice

, that is, if three of the three from the ukrainian authorities somewhere behave inappropriately i think that this will not happen, but if suddenly they calmly hold a competition with their votes. however, the competition was held. the new head of the specialized anti-corruption prosecutor's office , oleksandr klymenko, was appointed as the newly appointed general prosecutor, mr. kostin. the work of the specialized anti-corruption prosecutor's office has changed, this is the time of the appointment of klimenti, if you would evaluate the results of these few months of his work, it seems to me a month and a half, i will tell you, see rotterdam plus, one of the largest corruption schemes in the history of ukraine, 40 billion, in short , what is rotterdam plus, you and i overpaid for communal services because they entered a formula according to which the delivery of energy carriers was calculated as if it was from rotterdam and it was from the

occupied territories. in short, this is the case four times they closed it four times four times they fought back in the courts in a different way the former prosecutor general defended the prosecutor who closed the case in one word a new head garden came the case went to court full stop the investigation is over and now in court we will figure out who is right and wrong in public hearings, first of all in front of the whole country but the epic is over with the closing of the case, the trial will be resolved, let's move on in the first story, for the first time in the country, the residence of the oligarch, where he lives, kolomoiskyi in bukovel, was searched for the first time in history ukraine did not leak, by the way, he was not warned, that is, everything took place, a real

full -fledged search. the court will not roll you over to me, it has already gone to court, or the case will not go exclusively on saturday. what happened next, uh, kolomoisky rotterdam plus trukhin, there was something else in addition to the current cases in the energy center , centerenergo, suspicions of expanding the circle of suspects, that is, this is only the beginning. why, because in we are the 10 best prosecutors out of 40 10 out of 35 i'm sorry they are fighting and they need to be returned to work now because that's a third of the prosecutors and this is the best prosecutor and now that's a separate story imagine they will return 10 of the best prosecutors the dynamics will be completely different believe me completely different even better well, the position of chairman of nabu director of nabu is important, after all, this is a law enforcement agency and in such organizations, leadership is important, procedures are corporate culture, this is a strong structure, a strong institution, but leadership is important

, that is, can we conclude that these two months that mr. klymenko has been in office. and you characterize as positive the dynamics of his work by the specialized anti-corruption prosecutor's office , extremely effective. now it is obvious to everyone. why was his appointment blocked for so long, and this is only the beginning, and we have already seen several attacks on the powers of anti-corruption institutions. i think they will not be the last, and they will continue what else are you waiting for? well, apart from what has already happened. in these two months, how loud can the investigations be? i like the new anti-corruption prosecutor's office, they don't talk until the moment of implementation, that is, about their investigation, we will only know the moment when the suspect is served. i believe that this is correct. there are many abuses around the topic of corruption, and this is often abused by the authorities of the

dbr. you think it is your right to suspect communication and this is the right strategy of law enforcement agencies. i simply urge everyone else to go through this practice until there is no suspicion. here it is. open your mouths. if there is suspicion, it is normal because there why can we talk about the suspicion in public because there is a preventive measure and it will still be a court, so this is already a public part of the case. before that, dear law enforcement officers, i'm sorry, shut your mouths, because you have n't collected anything yet, and someone's reputation has already been destroyed . in your opinion, corruption authorities are slowing down, i have more expectations not for cases, but for powers, for example, now the anti-corruption prosecutor klymenko cannot expose himself to start the extradition of the suspects involved, they suspect

because it is done through the prosecutor general. and i am still not sure about the prosecutor general's ukrainian, we are still wondering why what worries you, i don't have any markers in it. when he did things and that went against the will of the political elite, i am not saying that he is bad if i don't know, we have several marker things, events for which we will evaluate the prosecutor general, so far we have not reached them. i remember one of the markers that alarmed you, it was also that a deputy from the ruling faction of the ruling party was appointed to the position of prosecutor general, this marker it remained wrong in principle. that is, it is a marker that at the start gave a person a minus in the reputation of

trust , even if everyone is cool. such a beginning this is the beginning of the content and we need now a plus to the prosecutor general not even in the history of corruption in the history of crimes reprimanding russia for war crimes therefore it is bad in principle a bad story when the prosecutor general is political the appointment should be a competition, the best one does not win and then he won the competition and he starts with a plus, he is the winner, he does not owe anything to anyone, he is a professional, the position itself needs such logic , everything is not about the last name, it is about the logic of the position , that is why in the anti-corruption strategy, which is a law in ukraine it seems to me that there is a clause on the amendment of the law on the prosecutor's office, which will provide for a competition. is one of the requirements of the european union in

order for us to retain the status of a candidate for membership of the european union, and there is another requirement , which is the introduction of the reform of the constitutional court of ukraine and the provision of a transparent process for the selection of judges. in your opinion, is everything smooth now we have these two issues with the nabu contest and the xusu members contest, uh, there is some kind of such a commission, we know all the names, it is moving somewhere, in the next week or two, the beginning of the collection of documents from candidates will be announced, that is, honestly from nabu i so far, calm, there was one attempt by the authorities to make the contest controlled by the authorities, not by the authorities. it seems to me, from what i see in the field, that the president hit his head and this story lay there. international partners got involved. the media got involved. the president got involved. he was forced to. ksu is more difficult because there is a law about which seems to regulate this

procedure for electing judges, the draft law, i apologize in the store, what is the problem with this draft law a-a he is not bad, you are not bad, that is, it is better than now 100%. simply the european union will assess whether we have fulfilled this point based on whether the adopted law will comply with the recommendations of the nazi commission, the conclusion of the committee on the integration of ukraine into the european union regarding this draft law, the draft law does not contradict international legal obligations in the field of european integration, i am sincerely from our committee to the european neighbors, our committee, i'm sorry, our committee is much less important than the venice commission, the venice commission directly said that the conclusion must involve civil society. it's simple. there was a tool of er, public integrity involved in the competition commission should be or it was recommended because i looked at the conclusion of the nazi commission and they use such phrases, i could

also include and you can also use the experience, well, look at me, it would be better to include this recommendation in one form or another so as not to open a discussion, because when you open a discussion, a field is created for opponents. my advice would be not to create, in principle, a forum for discussions against our european integration. the parliament is obliged to literally fulfill this rhetoric, because there is no herd, that is, the authority of this family is over. well, i would consider some forms and we gave several options for the president's office for the parliament. months have passed since the adoption of the law allowing the confiscation of the property of russian oligarchs located in ukraine, however

, we heard about the first such decision at the beginning of september, when the higher anti-corruption court passed the decision to confiscate the assets of yeftushinkov, one of the richest people in russia, why do we continue to dwell on high-profile cases regarding the confiscation of assets, in what month is the full-scale war between russia and ukraine look, i'm an optimist, i already remember this because we haven't heard haven't heard media society society media western apartments have begun, society is waiting for these cases, it is waiting for this, when the relevant decisions will be made, they began to ask the authorities. and where are the friends, and her friday passed well, eh, the national security council adopted the first, well, adopted a large package of such sanctions tells us about 1,300 subjects, among whom there are russian oligarchs, in which there are a lot of me, fridbenderibaska, there are many, not all, but the majority, if it is true, well, if the sources tell me

it is really true, then we are waiting for a presidential decree that will introduce a decision the nsdc is in effect, this decree will be. well, maybe the end of this week, maybe the beginning of the next. well, here it will be after that . the ministry of justice and where are they and the corruption court will take property. and there is property, if you include it, when the nsdc includes everything, then it is about 2.5 -2 billion dollars, that is, this process has begun, we will see which one is the president, because there will be clear names. well, they confirm to us from all sides that the most interesting under sanctions is the first step , because 2 billion is a lot, there are 300 billion in the united states that we have to fight for, but we are with these 300 billion and two billion, because it is 300 billion , it is the sovereign money of russia, it will be difficult to deal with it, it is necessary, it will be really difficult to take it, between them there is the property of russian oligarchs in the west, private property that

god himself ordered to take away, and it is one of the main obstacles in our advocacy, there were friends at the event to take away this property. well, you take it from yourself. so you take it from yourself first. and then tell us about it. thank god, this takeover has begun. if everything goes well , we expect that lawsuits will be filed in the anti-corruption court in a month. accordingly, there are still 20 days of development, 30 is two months, we will have a whole lot of confiscated property, and having these information devices, we returned to the discussion with our western friends in the eighth month of the war, whether there will be anything to confiscate, considering the fact that quite the russian oligarchs had a lot of time about what to do with the assets that are in ukraine, this is a great question, and with this question, we forced the authorities to move in this

process, because i also don't understand why the law that allows to do diety took so long the fifth month during this time, neither the subjects of the submission, the sbu, the national bank, the president's office, the verkhovna rada, the cabinet of ministers, did not hurry with this story, because who to submit had already been done, the analysis was conducted legally, they did not submit, did they submit at the end, or during this time, the assets could murayev's assets could change owners, they changed a few more, we can already see what was compared , but here it will be difficult to catch up, but we are optimistic , we will take a lot.

in general, how much time do we have to pass from the moment, let's say, when the decision was made by the court and the court, not the court itself, and before these resources, these assets get to the ukrainian treasury, an excellent question , what is the logic of the court saying that we take it away after that the cabinet of ministers determines who deals with assets, it can be non-specialized, there is an agency , we have an agency for the management of seized property , which is a lot of problems, a lot of problems. i would not give them the property . the property headed by pierre and for which i have great respect and the results of which show that he seems to me to be able to manage effectively what with this property depends on the property, on the asset, for example the huge ocean plaza in kyiv where the lease has already been bought where the permanent profit is already dripping it is

opening just the other day literally if we are supposed to sell it is a longer story well because it is necessary well it is preparation for sale sold it drips into the budget we don’t want to sell it was frozen you gave it to the army for warehouses well i miss you logistical needs were saved on this, the war was won, the manager's wisdom was already sold here, and i would not give the army 100%. and it will be a separate communication with the cabinet of ministers, don't give the army , give it to the army fund - this is this agency with management of seized property is so because it is simply convenient arma army and it will be the same as from lviv, you are my science since the beginning of the full-scale invasion on february 24, as of the beginning of september, ukraine has already received international aid for 17 and a half billion billion dollars, and we understand that that this is not the end, in your opinion, how effective is the

control over the use of this aid now? a good question: historically, as an organization, we have difficult relations with any government; it is normal for us to talk about the bad and not about the good. the institutional function, from what we see now, i will be as frank as possible. the government does not steal from the budget, because it is 60% formed by western money , there is an understanding that if we start stealing here now, then we simply will not keep western money, and without this money, there is nothing for to pay military salaries to anyone. that is, it is money that allows us to live and fight. does this mean that they do not steal? no, it does not mean that he is trying to form parallel financial flows so that they can be dispersed in something. but the most important thing is the large schemes of theft from the budget which

a producer that is filled with western donors is not at the highest level at the highest level we are not talking now about the milkists, there will always be many of them and this is good news, this means that the political elite, at least the key people, have nothing to do . what is the problem? parallel streams tend to be systemic, i would say so, they have not yet become systemic, but they tend in that direction. i have a request for political ethics, friends. stop here, i’m not even talking about any valuable stories, you can’t to explain to the congressmen that this money was stolen, well, not exactly from the budget, of course, it is a kashflow generated by a state-owned enterprise, part of which is owned by a non-state enterprise, you are stealing from yourself, that's why, friends, i'm

begging you directly, don't do this, you don't need to. but i'll emphasize once again that these stories are not systemic now. this is a good signal, in your opinion, and what means of control can be used here? well, i mean, strengthen parliamentary control, it is possible to strengthen public control, and give more powers specifically to civil society for control over this money is possible western control , let's understand together what kind of control we have , for example, in civil society, in the media and in the law enforcement system, we see a crime committed, civil society sees what is happening on the ground, and i don't mind that when we already if we see a crime, that's all a problem because we saw it, we have to talk about it and not implement it, and it affects the country, what can be done in order to use these

powers to prevent all crimes