tv [untitled] October 10, 2022 3:00am-3:31am EEST
3:00 am
with the example of those who pay $50 or more, a conversation with him on the phone. and if it is more than $99, then erazkevich will put this person's name on himself with a skeleton and a helmet at the meeting in prague. summer trainings of seven winter sports are held on such overpasses, as well as track and field athletes, you can polish your skills here. at a two-week meeting in prague, ours had time to practice to win the championship of the czech republic, rashkevich ukraine, and even to train refugees from ukraine, in addition, at a solemn concert for the independence day in prague, ukrainian immigrants were expecting a surprise, went on stage, say that
3:01 am
today vladyslav heraskevich, the first of the skeletons because of the allies, received an olympic license, the body we will fight for our freedom today, this is not entirely true, because we are fighting not only for our freedom , for the freedom of the whole world. konings trained at a beautiful mountain stadium, which looked like a picture. they lived in a small house where the perfect grandmother, kateryna yaka, met in our small house. of course, we went for a ride on the ice overpass, on which you can train even in the summer of this season. our team did not buy anything for ammunition, but bought
3:02 am
a lot of useful things for the ukrainian military on the last trip, they bought a drone for almost 2000 euros and sent it to mykolaiv oblast, because the main thing is that our warriors of light win. and the ukrainians will do everything for this, each in his place, it will be ukraine, i promise you that . latvia exactly in a month and a half , a new season begins in canada, more events of the sports resistance of ukraine in our next digest, we hold our fists for every ukrainian hero, this is everyone who brings our great victory closer stay active, take care of yourself and those close to the meeting, i feel like a hostage for
3:03 am
the last eight years, but i know i am in your favorite photos and i was and will remain our meeting, the question is whether we do n't even need their faces here, we will see their faces in the news, you will not find their names in the lists of awardees, they are unknown but extraordinary, they report on enemy positions, put up leaflets and blow up traitors, they bring victory closer, and because of them, the enemy has the earth burning under his feet, because this is our
3:04 am
land. glory to the ukrainian partisans, weapons, drinks medicines, equipment, to whom to transfer leave this choice, if you want to contribute to the defense of the state, but do not know how to invest in military bonds, support the cess now, buy a military bond worth 1,000 hryvnias, dollars or euros and return your funds with interest. let your money already work for our joint victory together from sums, the number of deposits is unlimited, details on the website bonzog.gov.ua , this car has turned from a family car into an evacuation, and we see how many people need this evacuation. otherwise, we could not get to shelling received concussions, they were already preparing for the capture of the caprice, pits are not born. my mother says that it is good for her
3:05 am
. i want to go there where it is difficult if zero, that is, he was an example in such nations, the work is being built that it is scary, it is difficult. to be honest, it is bratska mykola gave his life so that we could live heroes from monday to friday 21:15 in marathon the only news is that after putin a more radical person will not come to power who will believe that the ukrainian issue requires special operations and through a full-scale war using a cascade of nuclear weapons we have the only the opportunity to solve the ukrainian issue as we want to solve it is to expel the occupier from our territory to join nato p vitaliy i congratulate you on the
3:06 am
first channel of public broadcasting and congratulate you on the vasyl stus prize i think it is well deserved and i watched the award ceremony and listened to your speech and in particular in this speech you said the following words that we do not have a choice between victory and capitulation, we have a choice between victory and disappearance. so i wanted to ask you what ukraine needs for victory for victory ukraine needs, first of all, such military capabilities that will allow us to drive out the occupiers from our land and, first of all, to defend the very fact of the existence of ukrainian statehood, but for these seven months of a full-scale invasion, we are observing not only but we are also watching the evolution of ukrainian and russian military maneuvers, do you have an understanding of when
3:07 am
and how it will end, i am not a military expert, so i have no idea when and how it will end will end from the political point of view, if you ask me how a political analyst thinks, this is a conflict that can end in 8-9 months , relatively speaking, and can continue for up to 10 years. this is a typical conflict and war, and its continuation depends on the resources of the aggressor state but in the syrian version, the aggressor state had its own government, the basharas government, before it it turned out to have enough resources to fight against its own people. but the people turned out to have enough resources and external players to prevent the establishment of complete control over the territory in russia, this war continues. and today we see with different levels of escalation, now we also have to understand how much russia has enough resources to continue the escalation in one form or another, we do not know. but you say that you are not a military expert, of course, but you worked for a long time in the er, worked for the russian
3:08 am
audience and definitely know a lot about the russian leadership and pro-russian politics. and now there is a lot of talk about the fact that we may be observing some signs that russia is weakening, eh, are you that do you notice that this regime of vladimir putin is giving some snakes about the fact that the soviet regime is weak, they started talking about the year 1920 and all the white emigration said that he did not have long left, what about what he is doing with such levels of repression and such levels of struggle the bolsheviks should definitely fall, in principle, i believe that in the 1939s and 1940s, this regime exhausted itself in terms of military and economic capabilities, then there was simply the second world war, and in the 1945s, this regime was revived with such strength that it allowed it despite the economic and political inefficiency , there is still a lot to be done, and the thing is that when we say
3:09 am
that this regime is weak, we must realize that it can really weaken, it is obvious that what is happening in ukraine with the army of this regime and its political calculations is not the end, it is not better , and for it there is a way out but we don't know the pace of this weakening, they depend on many factors, and that's why his agony, as we say , can stretch for ten years, well, there are many versions that putin is sick, that putin can be removed surrounding yourself with conspiracy theory. it seems to me that conspiracy theory is the worst of the sciences. i remember the crime experts who had as much information about what was happening in the soviet leadership as we have information about what was happening in russia. they also invented various theories for years. this was their work . they received these are huge fees, they became doctors of science, wrote books, none of the predictions came true, but these people and now who among them
3:10 am
who left who survived the soviet union have an excellent reputation, they continue to invent various fables about russia that we will leave them in their conspiracy world, especially now this conspiracy world is also fueled by the telegram channels created by the russian special services, which also tell every day how putin dies and does not die. here he falls , here he crawls, here he walks and so on. to reality, we need to know reality, if we don't know it, all our conversations have no meaning. that is, you are a realist, you are not a pessimist, i am a realist. what would you say to our viewers, what should they prepare for? yes, you you say we should not hope for a disease, we should not hope for a coup of any kind but a mass one please tell me, but even if we hope for a disease, where is the guarantee that after putin a more radical person will not come to power who will believe that the ukrainian issue needs to be resolved on the way of the special operations service and on the way of a full-scale war with the use of a
3:11 am
cascade of nuclear weapons, why can’t we consider that this could be the case, why are we waiting for the death of putin, what is the way out of the situation, i don’t like it either it is clear that we proceed from stalin's or brezhnev's logic, then stalin died, khrushchev came, but it became easier, then brezhnev died, then andropov chernenko came, gorbachev came, it became easier, but not immediately, the same vasyl stus whom we mentioned just now died for gorbachev, that is, it does not immediately become and it may still be easier five five years after putin, the same tough policy until it becomes easier, but we remember that vladimir ilyich died lazily, after him it was stable it didn't get easier, it got worse, maybe if vladimir ilyich remained alive and healthy on the ground, there were no large number of crimes that occurred in stalin's time, people did not die in the tens of millions, no, that is, this question does not need to be looked for again for some strange options, which later you will have to be disappointed, you do not need to think about russia at all. about russia, if russia attacked
3:12 am
ukraine, then we have the only option to solve the ukrainian issue as we want to solve it, it is to expel the occupier from our territory , join nato, any other options securing our future, they exist. do you think that it is possible to expel the occupier from donbas and crimea, that is, to liberate all the territories of ukraine within the limits of 1991? there are now modern weapons. there is a will to win in any case. the very preservation of the ukrainian state on the political map of the world will already be our victory, because the main task of our enemy is to eliminate this state and join its regions to the russian the federation then planned to take kyiv in a few days and lost with it. why according to your observations
3:13 am
is it so disconnected from reality? it is obvious that it is disconnected from reality. it is absolutely clear to me what the operation to capture kyiv was based on. this is the arithmetic of politics based on false assumptions about the results of the 2019 vote in russia. they were sure, they did not hide it, it was discussed on all television shows that the party of peace and agreement with russia and this for the russian language, the party of capitulation defeated the party of war and look what a huge party of mir 73%. it was absolutely delusional because you and i know very well that the people who voted for volodymyr zelenskyi did not vote for surrender there , even if there was some surrender electorate that voted for pro-russian politicians who voted for zelenskyi as the lesser evil compared to poroshenko, he was small in the electorate of zelensky himself in the second round of the elections. it was definitely not the majority of his voters, but in russia, in the kremlin, it was considered quite differently
3:14 am
and when volodymyr zelensky first met with volodymyr putin in paris at the normandy summit and no capitulation took place, what did the brains say, do you remember and i don't remember that he betrayed his voters by betraying the voters, well, he was afraid of the nationalists, this is a very easy assumption for you. if we let's go to war, then first of all, the majority of ukrainians will greet us with flowers, bring us the sociology of how they voted, let's say in the kyiv, chernihiv, sumy regions, well, you see how our nuclear electorate is, that is, putin decided that zelenskyi's sector is putin's electorate, again, this is delusional, but i'm sure that this was in all the reports that were put on his table, and secondly, if zelenskyi was scared of the nationalists who gathered near his office and shouted to him that putin does not need zemnaya negotiate, then he will be
3:15 am
scared of the best russian tank. i will just run away and viktor fedorovich will come with me. viktor fedorovich definitely never betrays his voters. he is a very decent person. he will sign everything i tell him. here is all the very simple logic. lost, i have to tell you that the russian special services have always had a bad attitude for as long as i can remember, as long as i have been following what they advised, how they imagined the situation, it has always been so because they are used to writing about what is happening in reality since time immemorial stalin and what is liked in honor of russia eh in the quiet borders of which we now see the map of russia victory in this war eh is an existential question so it is the restoration of the so-called historical russia in the borders of the soviet union until the time until eh the russian federation will not exist within the borders of the ussr at about september 1991 without the baltic countries simply because of a nuclear conflict, and the russian political task will not be
3:16 am
fulfilled if russia dares to use nuclear weapons and does not receive an adequate response for it then of course, latvia, lithuania, and estonia will be included in the list of territories that should be returned to the russian state, so far they are not there, you are afraid of a nuclear attack, it would be completely inappropriate to be a living person and not be afraid of a nuclear attack the attack of the headquarters invasion that now putin's threats of nuclear weapons are no longer a bluff they must be taken seriously you said so at the end of february yes, i checked specifically because i was interested in what predictions you make specifically regarding a nuclear attack does the international community have fuses how to convey to putin what is available he does not need to do this, because sometimes it seems to me that the west does not have such arguments. i do not know whether the west has such
3:17 am
arguments, we do not know what the western leader tells russian officials in their consultations with him if they cannot to convince the russian leadership that the use of nuclear weapons will absolutely and also existentially change russia's relations with the world, of course nothing will stop putin here because he is generally okay with what he is doing, what will be the consequences . you continue to host the road to freedom program on the russian edition of radio svoboda. i actually discovered it because i didn’t know that it is also parallel to the youtube channel of the ukrainian youtube channel in russian. who are you trying to reach? more precisely, are there russians among those whom you are trying to reach? there are not many of them, i will tell you right away, and they have become fewer since the beginning of the full-scale war. if you are interested in the statistics of my own
3:18 am
channel, e-e, russians, that is, people living in the territory of the russian federation, there are never more than 10 -15%. but this in principle corresponds to the audience i could count on in russia and even in the uh-90s when i was a columnist for the 8th newspaper. was viktorogram on the echo of moskvych radio printed in some other liberal uh-uh if introduction because what i say and what my colleagues say, i do not think that it corresponds to the worldview of the vast majority of citizens of the russian federation. this is simply a fact. and when i make a russian-language product, i honestly do not count on the citizens of russia. i count on a global audience that just receives information by e-e through the russian language, i have a large audience, no wonder in kazakhstan, i value this
3:19 am
audience because i want people living in kazakhstan to receive some more information and on that offered to them by russian propaganda, i have a large audience in western countries, and i believe that these people who, say, watch my russian-language programs or blogs are, one way or another, also part of public opinion, which in turn contributes to our help, that's why when they say, here we are it is not necessary to speak this language. it is necessary because honest and clear information of this condition is possible - this is the vote of another congressman or member of parliament or the text of some journalist who writes in a different language but communicates with his audience, which may be bilingual, of course, that is, a person receives russian-language information, but does she write a letter in english to her congressman, to the house of representatives or to the senate? from the former
3:20 am
soviet republics, kazakhs, jews, anyone, i see these people and belarusians, i would, if i had my own time. you also know that most of the time and i don't see such a big game that is ready to use belarusian-speaking products, well, that is, there will be a youtube line in shorts . do you think we are during this war? i consider belarus an occupied country. i believe that in 2020, the occupation of belarus took place in approximately the same year as the occupation of the eastern and southern regions of ukraine. do i consider these people to be participants in the war? no, i do not consider them hostages the occupiers also does not apply to belarusians, that is,
3:21 am
to the criticism that often comes from ukrainians to belarusians that they actually contributed to the war by their passivity. do not support us enough, we can be treated with full understanding because it is not our heads, rockets are flying and we see how catastrophic life looks like, our fellow countrymen understand their emotions, this is our task as journalists. but at the same time, we remember what was the huge protest against the movement in belarus in 2020 and how was it in essence under the belarusian power apparatus lukashenko simply succeeded in what yanukovych failed in 2014 if we had a more effective power apparatus and also taking into account the level of ectoral support that yanukovych had in in the southern and eastern regions of our country, we could have a very similar regime, but the merit
3:22 am
of the ukrainian people is the merit of yanukovych's weakness as a ukrainian people, because we did not have such a power apparatus created the ukrainian people never gave an opportunity to an authoritarian regime to gain a foothold for a long time, and the belarusian people gave such an opportunity. when they actually agreed with the lukashenko dictatorship after 1694, our president kuchma also tried to build a strong state . but it literally crumbled in the hands of the president, although they were tragic. do you follow the events of ukraine without a coach? do you remember this action, all this struggle, and it naturally created uncertainty, i would say, even among the security forces, is it possible to put them in power? they themselves are responsible for their own actions and not the person who gives them criminal orders, and this has happened many times in the history of ukraine, and the maidan of 2004 has already proven that the people can win. this is a serious inoculation for the power structures, but in belarus
3:23 am
, the plums have always seen that the people always loses, and therefore it is necessary to put on the dictator this upbringing of such an oppressive i would still say ivan the terrible , it is effective, by the way, this is also what happens in russia, in russia during the protests on the swamp square , there were also very many people, very many it was in the time when ukraine was in such a certain political liturgy and we looked at moscow about but they are again like in 1991 and then it turned out that the power apparatus is not even from the point of view of repressions but from the point of view of the effectiveness of special operations quite effective in russia, you did not just overcome this kidney protest, they intimidated him, they destroyed the most active participants, they, uh, cemented the regime, and most importantly, they found an effective way to strengthen this state, this is absolutely a revelation of what to do if you don't want more repetition of such events, strengthen the power apparatus, fight, fight, not just strengthen your apparatus,
3:24 am
war is the way to preserve such regimes, in the end, i want to ask you and in your opinion, how should we coexist with the russians, this is the main question with the belarusians, this war will end. we hope that with our victory but neighboring russia and belarus will remain on the political map of the world, there will never be an independent democratic ukraine and putin's authoritarian russia, we will not sing about what will happen to us then instead of russia, there may be russia in the neighborhood, but it may be another state. or it would continue to destroy ready to destroy ukraine as long as it exists, we will repeat it , you are asking me about coexistence, i tell you that the coexistence of russians will not calm down until that day the troops will not go to the uzhhorod city hall and raise three flags there. i am not saying that this will happen. i am telling you what their goal is, and ukraine will calm down until it frees its
3:25 am
territory from the enemy. this is an existential conflict as you understand and it will continue as long as ukraine wants to be independent, democratic and sovereign and as long as russia wants to be a chauvinist one for and for which the actual development and conquest of the lands of the former empire are actually being developed and as long as these two organisms will exist side by side for a year two five ten so much confrontation will continue and not coexistence there will be no coexistence there is no need to even prepare for it russia will do everything to destroy ukraine putin at least its severity putin's russia and the ukrainians will do everything to fight back because, as i have already told you, during this conversation, ukrainians have the opportunity to either fight back or disappear as a nation, it is impossible to live next to the russians, even as a loyal and vassal people, because for the russians does not have a people, this is the time for the final solution of the ukrainian question, as
3:26 am
hitler once did the jewish question. so do not expect that the future of belarus will remain until belarus depends solely on what russia will be like if authoritarian russia falls in belarus there is an absolutely normal perspective of a democratic european state that may even become a part of the european family faster than ukraine due to the fact that the belarusian economy is not as destroyed and crippled as the ukrainian economy during the war if a democratic government comes to power in belarus and the ties between belarus and russia will be completely severed, it will be much easier for this government to carry out the necessary reforms for european integration than the government that will be in ukraine, but this does not mean that in an easy and simple road is easier for belarus, because russia may remain the way it is for a long time and we have every chance to overtake them so that we and the belarusians will one day meet in a united europe maybe we will even be the cause of their ideological occupation, but without our victory there will be no free belarus and with the russians, we
3:27 am
may simply not meet for this simple reason that russia, which completely loses in ukraine, may become part of a completely different civilizational world of authoritarianism and dictatorships, which will already be headed by the chinese regime and not russian and certainly this regime will give a final and decisive battle measures at some point if we are members not too much we will be part of this great battle and i would say the first line of this battle let's hope that then precisely the fear that it is a conflict between nuclear blocs will stop, uh, it is possible such a remote meeting between these states that this battle will be primarily economic and not military, but i do not give any guarantees here, because i think that
3:28 am
authoritarian market forces cannot exist on one planet regimes next to democracy with the same democracies, this is practical even from the point of view of economics, the laws of economics are not possible, therefore, a clash between them is for some, in principle , february 24 is the starting point of the starting gun, the war is just beginning, i was planning to draw a conclusion from your words that the only thing left to do in ukraine is to win, of course, only to win and join nato, this is the conclusion. such a war was a cold war during the confrontation between the soviet union and the west. yes, but the prospect of a global war would scare you a little, scare away from this conclusion correctly . but i repeat, a global war can be a global cold one. i just hope that if we are under a nuclear umbrella, we will in the center of this cold war, because we will be on the border of and europe, we always understand
3:29 am
. complexes, and this is also what i am telling you about. you asked about coexistence. i would like the russians and i to meet in europe. then for you, the center of europe was not the outskirts, you understand the non-frontier of europe, but simply one of the central european countries, behind which would be another european country, russia but if we do not meet with the russians, we will not always play the role of this vanguard, civilized education is a difficult role, even if from the war, because all these economic conflicts, all these provocations , all these troubles, everything will always begin with of the ukrainian lands and for centuries and i want us to prevent this and this is the question of coexistence with the russians. i do not see the prerequisites for such coexistence now. i would like to see them again, not for the sake of the russians, but for the sake of us and you, so that we find ourselves
3:30 am
in the center of a not by the way, but i don't see it, i can't just deceive you like this, that's why we win and strengthen nato, join the european union, become an organic part of a democratic civilization that will be able to defend itself. thank you, mr. vitaly , all this talk. thank you, tell me honestly. they think the day is covering the day. so i don't want to leave the house because of the force. i started running because i understand that i somehow need to let it go. it becomes easier. i will focus on my feet. feel how firmly they stand on the surface of the earth or the floor. if it is convenient, take off your shoes.
5 Views
IN COLLECTIONS
Espreso TV Television Archive Television Archive News Search ServiceUploaded by TV Archive on