will they be for russia, because we understand that usually these structures make somewhat decorative statements and this can be understood, this is their authority, you know , i’m not so enthusiastic about voting, a genetic feature of the u.n. to be honest, well, first of all, this is a kind of referendum on the attitude towards ukraine the whole world is black and white, the world is cut in halftones, that's why we see that there are countries that voted directly to support the territories of ukraine, there are countries that abstained, it's unclear how you can abstain, do you agree or not the territory on whose borders it is located, having a diplomatic representation of this country, there are those who voted against it, the situation is clear, there are those who did not vote, did not vote at all, and the number 35 surprised me. in 2018, 141 countries condemned and

supported ukraine, now there are 143 countries, so for almost 8 months, the number of countries that actually directly support ukraine has not increased, and we call this category of countries five countries that are against and where are we doing iran? well, it is clear to those who received exactly that that this country openly indulges the territorial integrity and is an opponent of the state that does not recognize the territorial integrity of ukraine. where to put it ? the former soviet union, which putin allegedly wants to restore to the 100th anniversary of his maniacal idea, which he pursued there for a certain period of time, that's clear. we are taking the baltic countries. we are taking two countries that they are obviously heading to moldova, which supported us, and georgia, which somewhat unexpectedly supported us , despite certain reservations about the leadership, but the position of azerbaijan, which did not vote at all in this resolution

of the assembly. kept it, what should be done with those countries, what should be our position? in other words, in 8 months, we have really not moved forward in terms of supporting the world globally according to the decision of gen of the un assembly, more than that. to blame our diplomacy, uh, diplomats are better s- former or no former, they will say it better for me, but it seems to me that here we still need to understand that we are globally, globally, in those 8 months, we have not made any significant progress in relation to russia, of course, there is no such thing the european human rights community here, it is obvious that here we are planning to stand in this position of all the members of the couple and in general the eyes of this institution that condemned and recognized russia for terrorism, there are no other opinions here, but this plebiscite of the un generals says that we did not acquire, did not build up allies today and this bipolar world that is now

being formed on the one side of the united states of america and the european union on the other side of china under which russia falls more and more looms and threatens more and more let's put it this way our territorial values ​​and prospective the end of this war, if you go back to the graph where there were countries that won, well, in my opinion, what is this about the fact that the panther was burned , there will be a qualitative change when china will not be among the withheld and china will vote for the resolution p muzychko, your thoughts on the geopolitical processes of this week, because, on the one hand, we see this vote, which really has not changed much in the countries at the beginning of the full-scale invasion of the russian federation, but now there are definitely no discussions about the transfer of weapons about the transfer of anti-aircraft defense of everything necessary for ukraine, because the measures are now there is no doubt that this is anti-aircraft defense, uh, these means against air defense can somehow later fall into the hands of the russians, well, first of all, the composition of the

it is impossible to agree or disagree with mr. thyreos regarding the number of countries that would support our country in the fight against russian aggression, but the world is really very diverse and ambiguous in black and white, so each group of those countries had its own interests which are connected in one way or another directly or indirectly with our aggressor, so perhaps they either abstained or simply did not vote, but we must agree that our diplomacy must work with those countries in order to get more support, for example, african countries, e.e. angola, congo, south africa, south africa, there is an extremely large potential and we need to work with these countries, we have a wonderful ambassador there. by the way, he is in south africa as of now regarding the parliamentary assembly of the council of europe. well, i remember him a few years ago, the aggressor of the russian

federation was returned to the membership of this very respectable european organization, almost to applause, but i have a question about why russia should stop paying membership fees contributions and that's why she was unanimously condemned and recognized as a terrorist by the state. that's why trolling is so easy. and in general, in the last week and a half, there have been really heart-breaking events that have extremely accelerated the entire movement that is happening now on planet earth, only in the last few days, such events as the resolution of the united nations organization of the general assembly rammstein and the meeting of the great seven countries preceded them and all these resolutions clearly show us that now the attitude of the western world towards russia is radically changing, and the western world is losing certain barriers and its easy

-to-quote fear of this great monster that scared the last, for sure, more than 50-70 years in europe, the european world ended after the end during the second world war, how long was it a nuclear state and it is, in the end, the western world was somehow convinced that it was really an extremely great power, and this, as it turned out, was proved by the ukrainian armed forces and our heroic brave people, a colossus on clay feet, without a doubt he will fall but all the same, problems remain and here, in my opinion, there are two big questions for the world community: first, what to do with these nuclear weapons, this is the question that arose in 1991 after the collapse of the soviet union, and the second question is how to equip this great, powerful the monster that exists today so that this state becomes er or smaller or

more democratic er more pragmatic and could integrate into the civilized world and to these questions i understand that there is no answer so far, but what er has now been decided decision about the active increase and build-up of various types of weapons, including anti-missile defense against air defense, this is a huge plus, in the end the west stopped being afraid, and this is indicated by the statements of even the diplomat of european diplomacy, jose po borel, who said today that nato will respond to nuclear threats or nuclear attacks by physical force, as in diplomatic language, this means that you guys are on the hook, if that’s the case. if it’s so simplified that he said that there won’t be a nuclear response, but there will be a response hard enough, we can now see exactly this comment, we have just a quote, but it is also

important that literally a few minutes before the start of our broadcast, the press conference of lloyd austin, yes, the head of the defense sector of the united states of america, ended, and we have an excerpt. this is what he said, we even you haven't heard it yet, let's listen to it and then we 'll listen to our guests in our studio because we have diplomats , so it's interesting to hear politicians and diplomats. in the decisions that you are making today in nato are you changing your policy on the use of nuclear weapons or not and what are you planning in this regard as far as what we are planning uh regarding any potential uh you potential event that could happen i i never want to speculate on what could happen or could happen,

so i don't want to talk about it, this is a hypothetical question, but it's nato's business to make sure that we have the capabilities to protect nato countries, and that's all we we always discuss we always try to make sure that we have the appropriate capabilities and they stand in their places in order not only to protect nato, but also to continue our efforts to remain unchanged . that our leadership says that it is somehow responsible on the part of russia to use this kind of rhetoric, irresponsible rhetoric regarding the so- called free rattling of nuclear nuclear weapons. i think it is quite dangerous and again nato again does not threaten russia with anything. it was

russia's war of choice and when we look at what are the indicators or any warning about what is happening and we think what changes we need to make, but if we look at what happened yesterday and we look to what happens er every 24 hours every seven days a week we then accordingly take appropriate steps one of the decisions we can make today is that russia can choose by choice er to end this war and lead to escalation and because this is their war of their choice , of course they have a choice and they can stop this aggressive behavior and withdraw all their troops and the sovereign territory of ukraine the next question mark is let's see what the consequences of this rammstein but that's all - do you know the one in may

, if i'm not mistaken, rammstein when the same island said that the usa would turn heaven and earth in order for ukraine to achieve its victory well, it was like that, you know, this speech let's say it's more threatening than now because here now, well, it's not my view maybe i'm not a diplomat yet, i might be wrong here, anyway, the door is being followed somewhere for certain negotiations in the event that, well, if the russians can go back, mr. sebalyuk promised you a word, then a reply, antonyshchak well, in fact, colleagues have already said that this week was definitely not easy for the ukrainians which er began to get used to. unfortunately, before the war, it was a reminder that you still have to take care of your safety. it was a test of our armed forces, which, in my opinion, coped with their main task, and the whole world saw that

the armed forces of ukraine and other power structures that today are fighting for the independence of ukraine, they are in their place, and compared with p. antonyshka, he said, and february and the present time, the training of our and air defense and other forces is still significantly higher at the highest level for the ukrainian government, it was also a test of how we are preparing for the winter, which will definitely be difficult. e-e experts say that the russians have been preparing such an attack for several weeks because of this, it is not true that after

the crimean bridge there was already a response right away. about the international community well, let me say that, first of all, we are grateful to our international partners, because no one owes us anything, and in fact it is a challenge for ukrainians, first of all, but if we talk about europe, then we finally do not see the promised 5 billion euros, which have been talked about for several weeks. so far, there are no economic challenges facing not only the government, but the entire state

. number for the russian federation and after that, sian deciphered for those in the kremlin who cannot hear clearly specifically what the answer would be in the event of the use of nuclear weapons, and he answered the journalist's question whether he would meet her in the middle or in the 20s or november biden and putin he said no, i have no desire to meet with him except on the condition that putin comes and says that he is ready to return those american citizens who, according to the united states, are illegally imprisoned in russia today, everything else i am not going to i will quote almost verbatim to talk to putin, this is also the position of the united states, it is an extremely important statement

, and there were also serious ones in brussels, i also agree that this is a strong position on the vote of the un security council from those five countries that are against. are fighting against ukraine, russia, belarus, iran - this is also something that must be said frankly, that here our international partners should think about sanctions pressure on these states, not only on russia, and i want to conclude that the statements are really harsh, but they must be followed by concrete actions concrete actions are partially already in place and this is confirmed by the armed forces of ukraine literally er-er several hours and days but er-er this is not enough, after all, er-er understand that international structures here are diplomats i think more

about this they will also say whether they need international the structure of certain reforms, because the minister of foreign affairs of hungary, for the second time since february 24, went to russia yesterday to an international forum where russia and hungary are supposedly discussing energy security, how can we be when more than ten european states sharply condemned such energy terror on ukraine and where else, that is, there are issues not only of the united nations and the security council, but also of the european union and nato countries, that is, one of the states of this respectable one or the other structure cannot have the right to veto and dictate to everyone else, how should the community live, the challenges continue.

every citizen of ukraine must understand that air warning signals apply to everyone, and the authorities must draw conclusions about what to say publicly and what to simply draw conclusions and prepare for challenges, not only uh, preparation is booming, there are other more serious things, i do i wanted to give my daughter a word, but today i remember. we are working in this studio system today, it is not just to create some kind of picture there, the electricity consumption of our studio during the live broadcast is about 50 kw this is very, very much, now we have reduced it to less than 20 and well, we will try to use as little electricity as

possible during this broadcast evening time. there may simply be shelling of the energy structure, they will happen and there is no doubt that russia will continue these shellings because what happened in the end continued today, but what happened yesterday and the day before yesterday is a clear reality all of putin's plan is that it took place in this missile attack on this very day. first of all, it's a coincidence, because putin always wants to destroy ukraine and ukrainians, he wanted to do it in 2014, he wanted to do it in february 22 year, this is what he wants to do. and now in october of the 22nd year, and as long as putin exists, until then his desire to destroy our country and destroy ukrainians will exist, but i am convinced that he is

pursuing another goal, because he 100% understands that even such massive strikes he is not capable to completely destroy the energy structure and infrastructure of ukraine, he wants to incite panic in people, let's be honest, it was not a very pleasant sight for ukrainians, although it is understandable when not even thousands, but tens of thousands of ukrainians moved towards the western border of ukraine after february 24 and sought their refuge outside ukraine. putin is convinced that he wants to see such a picture again, because he probably achieved that the people who were planning to return to ukraine after these massive rocket attacks probably thought about whether do we have to wait? it is very important that we definitely do not panic, but that we instill faith in

our people that here in ukraine we have to build a safe life and we can do everything in ukraine, and the fact that these shellings have taken place since monday. i am convinced that putin pursued his own plan. well, it is certainly not a small but sufficiently mercantile plan. i am convinced that those in russia who planned the terrorist attack on the crimean bridge those who in russia carried out the terrorist attack on the crimean bridge definitely wanted a monopoly on putin's power and putin responded for the account of ukraine and returned the muscovite, perhaps this is their wish to count how they live like this. and as for the bourgeois, i understand that you mean the statement of the mayor of lviv. yes, this applies not only to the mayor of lviv, the question is here today . and where were you guys for six months when the rockets arrived in in february, you didn't understand that we would be bombed further, isn't it clear to any

basic professional that it is necessary to have a double supply of transformers, compressors, that the entire infrastructure must be located today additionally in warehouses of course you don't need to send money to it's not clear why here, none of the people's deputies present voted for the state budget for the draft state budget in the first reading and why? expenses, what are we going to vote for infrastructure, give money for infrastructure and security, it is enough to have the appropriate means in the warehouse, and then there will be no need for bourgeois, but i would like to return to global things, today we discussed the resolution of the organization of the united nations, you know and we are ukrainians. we must be ukrainian-centric, that is, ukraine above all should be in the heart, in the head, in the

mind of every ukrainian. if it is different, then we simply will not be ukrainians, but we must also understand that the world does not revolve around ukraine, the world today is much more complicated and today it is very important for ukraine to preserve our state, the issue of the security of our state is on the agenda from this world, because we will fight for ukraine and only we we will win because we will then fight together with us and support the whole world. maybe someone did not pay attention, but before the meeting before the vote at the general assembly of the united nations and the head of the state department of the united states of america convened a meeting for some discussion on the issue of voting because first they failed the desire of the muscovites to have it be a secret vote, and then there was a separate meeting and there was the question of not even ukraine anymore or not

only ukraine is this a vote for ukraine was more than the issue of voting for ukraine and for me several countries are significant, so i am very sorry that azerbaijan did not take part in the vote or turkmenistan did not take part in the vote, but i saw that such countries as brazil and saudi arabia voted for the territorial integrity of ukraine arab emirates, do you remember the problem that arose with the audit, when they again made a decision to reduce oil production and put oil on the world market? that is, this vote was a vote on ukraine, but not only on ukraine it was a global vote on how the world players are distributed and if someone wants to see or delve more seriously, i would recommend reading the speech, it has already been published in ukrainian, by the high commissioner

for foreign policy, jose po borel, before the diplomats of the european union, a globally serious and strategic vision and what will happen next in the world , that is why it was a vote about ukraine, but we must understand that the world does not live only through ukraine, but we must force the world to live, experience and fight for ukraine and this is our task and this task , including those in this hall who are working today or are they finalizing, you know, i was very impressed by the vote that was on the discussion uh-uh on the agenda of the issue of respecting human rights in china, how did ukraine vote ukraine did not support the resolution proposed by the united states of america. i do not understand who in ukraine makes such decisions. and how, after such decisions, we have communication with our

global partner, the united states of america, well, they will never be on the same page in the united states the united states and china are like this today's world and if ukraine wants to stand in a tightrope well, this tightrope will end badly today we are supported globally by the western world and globally we have to be the western world otherwise we will simply lose when we hold an otaku event we really tried to be non-aligned well we tried to be on one foot it is not known where. therefore, we must be ukrainian-centric, but we must force the world to stand on the side of ukraine, and the last thing the ukrainian government should do. it should do at least what the leader of the european solidarity security forum in sweden's speech, poroshenko's congress of conservatives in great britain, poroshenko's speech, why weren't there representatives of the ukrainian government, who will

speak for the ukrainian government about ukraine? should act together and not only we today should do what the ukrainian government is not doing in our country like markiyan lopachak, junior lieutenant of the armed forces of ukraine, secretary of the lviv city council, we congratulate you glory to ukraine mr. markiyan, i just want to ask you about what else we can expect during these next days, tomorrow we will celebrate the day of the defender of ukraine, the day of the creation of the ukrainian insurgent army, and there are such fears that a massive attack by the russian federation of our enemy russia may be the end of this terror of theirs, well, in your opinion, what can we expect again in fact, he is probably a judge of lviv and other cities that have been in such relative calm for the past few months, because

if you pay attention to how other regional cities live, how kharkiv lives, how zaporizhia mykolaiv lives, in fact from a full-scale invasion there, the shelling just doesn't stop every day. of course, for some it was a surprise in a certain way , because everyone hopes that the city will be safe and somehow it will pass, but unfortunately we have a situation in which this enemy will not stop at nothing and for sure we need to prepare for further ones. and let's hope that our pto forces, together with this help, which we have been hearing for literally two days now, will be strengthened and new systems will be provided to us, which of course improves situation, but unfortunately, as the experts say and the intelligence says that our enemy has a sufficient number of e-e missiles, that's why, of course, it's too early to talk about security. i

wanted to talk to you. you know what to talk about. on the fronts, but you still keep your hand on the pulse of the life of the city of lviv, you and i spoke on the day when these shellings took place, and well, it was quite difficult to perceive in the city in the city of lviv, but in the end, it seems to me that these few days when the people of lviv really didn't run did not start to leave the city en masse and there literally already on wednesday, despite all the troubles, there are traffic lights and still not working everywhere, the city is recovering to life, how do you look at this situation in general, and what do we need to prepare for in lviv in winter, a few basic sentences well, how to prepare of course that you need to prepare and you need to take all the actions that the city government and people in general can do for themselves, that is, you need to understand that the situation with water and electricity and with gas and so on can be critical

, that is, there must be a certain necessary amount the most necessary things in the house should be warm clothes, there should be candles, i don't know, the possibility to brew tea or heat food there, there should definitely be some kind of supply of batteries or power banks so that at least you can charge a mobile phone there or a flashlight there, well, anything, that is, there are banal things that unfortunately, we must now keep the deed in our homes , which again applies to what you said that the people of lviv. to threaten, and this is the arab psychology of the majority of the russian leadership, who think that it is possible to intimidate the ukrainians now with some number of missiles, no matter how critical the strikes on our infrastructure are, they are deeply mistaken, because each strike, and it unites us even more, unites us even more motivates us, we

become even clearer, more embittered and more confident in what we are doing because, well, we are afraid, well, they are afraid there, is anyone afraid of where to go , what do we have to go somewhere and leave? no, we must stand and shoulder to shoulder to help our country, sir marcian, i asked you for a reason about this limit of their actions by our enemy, or, after all, they repeatedly said about a nuclear strike there and said that it was not a bluff, in the end, what should be the reaction of the world in your opinion, because we heard, well, different opinions of the american president he said one thing is that the head of eu diplomacy, jose borelli, said that there will be no nuclear response, but the response will be military . the statement of mr. macron , the president of france, was also strong enough. well, there will be no nuclear response. and what should it be, how should the world react? well, here hard to give recommendations or there