in the center and on wednesday, quite a noticeable cooling is expected, but not final. but, nevertheless, for now, the anti - cyclonic nature of the weather will prevail. just now for your attention, i offer a news release from my colleagues from the ukrainian editorial office of bbc news. good evening. we are from ukraine. welcome to bbc news from ukraine . olga palamaryuk is working from the london studio and today we are talking about the following the ukrainian authorities require the red cross to visit the colony in the occupied deer park where prisoners of war are kept, they saved children with blood cancer in the kyiv region, said goodbye to oksana leontieva, who died as a result of shelling in

belarus . yarmak made a demand without an alternative to the international committee of the red cross by october 17 to send a mission to the colony in the occupied deer park where hold ukrainian prisoners of war at the end of july, an explosion occurred in the volyn colony , more than 50 ukrainian prisoners of war were killed, dozens were injured, the russian side claimed that the armed forces of ukraine shelled the colony with

himers salvo rocket systems, kyiv claimed that the russian military carried out a targeted artillery attack on the colony in order to accuse ukraine of committing war crimes and also to hide the torture of prisoners and the murders that were committed there in the red cross have already responded to the request of the president's office, they say they are ready to go to the colony. however, they cannot forcefully enter a place where they are not allowed, and we are talking more about this with the director of the yevgeny institute of world politics, magda. congratulations. thank you for joining our broadcast. it is not acceptable to use rhetoric good evening i think this is the reaction of the president's office to the attitude of ukrainian society to the international committee of the red cross the realities of the russian-ukrainian war to a certain extent

became hostage to the ukrainians' ideas about his omnipotence, and let's say during the siege of azovstalia and the withdrawal of the defenders from there, words were heard about the guarantees of the red cross, which did not appear, then the death of ukrainian prisoners of war in volynivka only worsened this attitude. about the fact that the international committee of the red cross is supposedly ceasing cooperation with ukraine, but this is not so, that is why the president's office reacted in such a strange, in my opinion, way in red they declared that they cannot get into olenivka. we know that zaporizhzhia npp is not allowed. how can international organizations work in this case? the thing is that olenivka is the occupied territory of the donetsk region, that is, the occupied

territory of ukraine, well, the territory to which in international law is actually a de facto gray area. zone and indeed it is difficult for the international committee of the red cross to get there but i think that the organizations of the un system and the international committee of the red cross would have won if they made a joint statement that their possibilities are far they are not limitless, they need to better communicate the situation and explain their capabilities in the conditions of the largest war in the 21st century, otherwise they will simply rapidly lose their authority. well, besides that, what else can international humanitarian organizations do in order to get to the territory occupied by russia, it is obvious er, the international committee of the red cross should at least try to

delegate its powers to some er, informal mission. i am now offering options because the fate of thousands of ukrainian prisoners is that hurts the ukrainian society and we need to look for different opportunities, otherwise, not only the international committee of the red cross, but other humanitarian organizations, they will bear such great reputational losses that it will be difficult for them to regain their influence later, not only in ukraine , but also in the world as a whole thank you for the conversation it was the director of the institute of world politics yevhen magde thank you earlier this week russia launched massive shelling on ukrainian cities in the center of kyiv among the dead as a result of the shelling oksana leontyeva was a doctor at the okhmatdit children's specialized hospital. her

five-year-old son, a hematologist, was left an orphan. she worked in the bone marrow transplant department for 11 years. today, they said goodbye to her in the kyiv region . today , five people were killed in arms at this intersection in the center of kyiv. leontieva, one of the leading pediatric oncologists and hematologists of ukraine, she hurried to work in okhmatdyt before taking her 5-year-old son to kindergarten, the life of a 36-year-old doctor was cut short a russian rocket, she herself saved the lives of dozens of children with blood cancer in her native village of gnidin, parents, native colleagues said goodbye to oksana in the morning of october 10 in the

bone marrow transplantation department and did not wait for the patient, we came for the first time. this is what we sat waiting for her, we waited a long time, no one knew what it was, she shared her experience with her colleagues during her career, a doctor of the same level as oksana leontyeva managed to train about a dozen younger colleagues over this time for me, oksana was a certain kind of guide to this world, yes, to the education of children's homeology, bone marrow transplantation, precisely because she always said how best to do it, how it would be faster. and it also seemed to me at the beginning that all i had to do this if we were to treat our hematological part, but her attitude towards patients showed me that we are not only interested in the quality of the patient's disease,

his status, we should be interested in his life in general, the quality of life. in addition, she was a person who was always ready to help, who could support the most difficult day, the most difficult moment, when something was not working out for you, she could give some advice or just talk to you, it was easier for you. oleksandr dragomiretskyi was one of the first rescuers at the scene of oksana's death, rocket weapons were used, and combat weapons the part that fell right from here was vyrva somewhere er-e with a diameter of five meters and a collector passed under it, this is the center of the city, an educational institution of the shevchenko university of the ministry of our of education, e.e. military. as you can see, there are no facilities here, that's why the net was used. i

think that this is an act of terrorism . i think that even people could n't understand what happened because they were all burned alive and it was, well, literally a second was counted. oksana leontieva's workplace remains untouched. medical tests, pictures of small children . patients and recent records. she has always been an open person and this openness. she felt with all her heart that's why for us this is a loss not

only colleagues. well, it’s just that now it will be clear that it’s not true, that maybe she’s in the hospital, that maybe it’s not her car, maybe she went somewhere, but unfortunately , russia kills our best people and continues to do it with impunity, it’s the price for our freedom that everyone we pay and she shares in her life » kyiv i will remind you from the shelling on october 10, six people died in kyiv, dozens were injured, 35 people are

still in hospitals. the mayor of kyiv reported that in general , 19 people were killed by shelling all over ukraine that day, and how many in russia there are still weapons reserves, the minister of defense of ukraine, oleksiy ryaznikov, said that according to his data, russia has about 300 kamikaze drones that moscow bought in iran. it is these drones that the russian military uses to defeat ukrainian cities and objects of critical infrastructure, according to him, ukraine is doing everything possible to effectively counter them. in addition, reznikov made public his version of russia's missile reserves, according to the information of the ministry of defense of ukraine, before the start of a full-scale war, russia had 900 missiles for the iskanders , 124 remained, and russia's arsenal had 500 missiles type of sea-based caliber and 444 cruise missiles of the has101 and kha-55 types, there are

272 and 213, respectively. and as for ukraine. this week, nato countries promised kyiv more military aid, but what about the stockpiles of weapons of the alliance countries to what extent they can help ukraine is analyzed by the former deputy assistant secretary general of nato jamie shay ukraine ukrainian war is rather similar to the extraordinary european conflict of the 20th century when thousands of projectiles are released per day and hundreds of missiles are launched, so the reserves are quickly depleted, moreover, there are many large defense contractors after the cold war believed that they would no longer need to produce certain weapons. because there would no longer be a large conventional war, they allowed a simple no attracted qualified personnel. therefore, all this must now be restored, independent ukraine and russia put in place , nato solves many security problems, so i think the obligations to ukraine will also be respected since

russia and crimea in 2014 nato must return to the collective defense of its borders with international forces with the shipment of equipment and supplies to the territory of eastern nato member countries, but this also means that defense budgets must increase . great britain, for example, is currently talking about what to spend 3% of their gross domestic product on defense i believe that despite the economic crisis nato member countries almost all support the obligation to spend two percent of their russian federation during the war in ukraine is about to be fulfilled he said about this during visit to astana, according to him, and the planned three hundred thousand fighters have already been mobilized, 223,000 additional conscriptions are not planned, besides, putin said that there is no need for massed strikes on ukraine, at the same time, mobilization is secretly being prepared in this was reported to belarus by the local edition of our

niva in ukraine, they introduced a regime of terrorist operations, this is being done against the background of reports of preparation of provocations by neighboring states end of quote and what this could mean for ukraine, we will ask the former ambassador of ukraine to belarus , roman bessmertny, mr. roman, i welcome you on the air of dobro in the evening, the first of belarus, russia is creating a joint regional grouping of troops now here is this statement about the regime of the counter-terrorist operation in your opinion lukashenko is thus preparing for attack on ukraine, or is it rather a psychological trick to intimidate it in accordance with the agreement on the creation of a union state of the republic of belarus and the russian federation, in fact, all management of the security sector is carried out from the kremlin, and in this case, all steps related to mobilization with the so-called counter-terrorist operation - this is what the kremlin orders to do, and in

fact, white is now carrying out, including the mobilization program of the kremlin, including the creation of a so-called joint grouping of troops , including the location on its territory units of the armed forces of the russian federation, i have no doubt that in this way the belarusian army and lukashenko are preparing to participate in aggression against ukraine, and the question of when these aggressive actions will begin is already a question of yesterday, from my point of view, on the 10th after the massive missile artillery a-a preparation of rocket-artillery offensive was to begin , including from the northern front of the front line with the republic of belarus and due to the fact that this is a rocket-artillery attack gave very low the results from the point of view of the evaluation and the assignment that

was given to it, all this hung, and the current steps only deepen the mobilization of the belarusians and the creation of joint military groups on the territory of belarus, and it must be understood that hmm, within one or two months, the resolution will come in what way the outcome will depend not only on the actual ideas of the kremlin and its satellite lukashenka, but also on how the offensive in the east and south of ukraine will develop, so this nervousness on the part of lukashenka is explained by two things, on the one hand, putin's pressure regarding the mobilization to accelerate the entry of belarus into the war, and on the other hand, lukashenko is simply afraid because he perfectly understands that the

belarusian army does not have the russian strength to resist the onslaught of the ukrainian armed forces. he declared that belarus is starting. in your opinion, how much belarus can mobilize its uh, about what kind of uh, statements that putin makes, don't believe no because he said no because he is speaking now not because he will speak mobilization in russia was going before the announcement during the announcement and will go after the announcement this figure of e 300,000 is taken from the ceiling it is completely virtual the potential of belarus is minimal because there is a conscript army in belarus its level of training for conducting modern hostilities none and it is obvious that we are talking about the entry into the territory of belarus of russian troops , including the newly formed units, but they are

not prepared in essence to date, looking at the map, you can say absolutely clearly ukraine is surrounded by meat that is pushing the kremlin fuhrer together with his minsk satellite fuhrer to ukraine. it is obvious that the level of training is not adequate for the weapons to equip these units. what can be gathered in belarus when 88% of belarusians are against the participation of belarus and belarusians in this war, but what is the civilized world to do when we know that international sanctions have been introduced against minsk, which levers of influence are possible, the first thing is to do it

regardless of the maneuvers that are taking place now in the kremlin and in belarus, the armed forces of ukraine must be provided with the necessary weapons, the second thing is that we must take care of ourselves and improve the security system, and the third thing, i have no doubt that it is time for the world to unite including on the battlefields in ukraine against the aggressor because only in this way can the victory over the kremlin and minsk fuhrers be accelerated if the solution is positive to the question yes will be stretched accordingly and the war will be stretched in time, is he considering using nuclear weapons, with which the bbc correspondent threatens the muscovites , rosenberg is trying to find answers to these

questions, let's see how putin will act in ukraine, what does he think his military special operation did not go according to plan, but retreat is not his styles vladimir vladimirovich putin here he is, classic putin at a meeting in moscow, the leader of the kremlin portrays russia as a victim and the authorities in kyiv as terrorists, but note that it was russia that invaded ukraine konstantin remchukov's publications criticized the russian government for its bluster and nuclear weapons. he himself says that putin wants to establish a new world order and wait for him. there is no need for escalation in the near future. he is a dictator with nuclear power in this country. he is an undisputed leader. he is fixated on some of his beliefs. and ideas began to believe that they are the most important. will

putin really use nuclear weapons in ukraine? he already made clear hints a few days before the russian invasion. putin visited large-scale nuclear exercises since then he warns the west that the nuclear option is not a bluff putin believes that defeat is unacceptable for him if you ruled the country for 22 years like putin and if you silenced all your critics and crushed the opposition as putin did, you would probably also feel that you will always be to accept the probability of any other outcome as a winner would be to face the unpleasant fact that you are not almighty and in a country without checks or balances where leaders do not feel responsible to society there are only a few things that limit the creams in the decisions made, the problem is that the system that has been rebuilt for these

30 years has not created a society in russia. there are many good people. i think you have met them, but there is no civil society. that is why russia can not resist. well, so far only ukraine is resisting the kremlin and the event battle for africa minister of foreign affairs dmytro kuleba last week he went to african countries, but already this week he had to interrupt his tour due to russian missile attacks on ukrainian cities, if he had time to visit four other countries, the special representative of ukraine in the middle east and africa maksym sup visited instead of him, and my colleague georgiy erman and i are talking about the ukrainian diplomatic struggle for the support of african countries. he is an africanist.

war with russia, while some african states prefer to maintain neutrality and not to annoy russia, well, first of all, we can already say that this tour is africa and it was successful, or rather it is still continues since maksim sup is still in africa and continues to visit the countries of south africa, and dmytro kuleba, despite the fact that he was able to visit only four countries, he managed to hold many negotiations, meetings with three presidents and one vice president in these four countries where he was this is also, by the way, an indicator of success, because usually african presidents meet only with their equals, that is, with presidents and heads of governments, but not with ministers, that is, this was also an indicator, by the way interest in ukraine to its such revival of its presence in africa and the second factor of success can be said that it is first of all, of course

, the vote in the un general assembly that took place on october 12 for the resolution recognizing the territorial integrity of ukraine against the pseudo referenda proposed by russia, that is, if we recall a similar the resolution in the un general assembly that was voted in march when uh-uh when called on ukraine to vote against the intervention against the invasion of russia uh into ukraine and then there was there are much fewer african states that voted to support the territorial integrity of ukraine, of course, still half of the states abstaining and or absent during the voting for such a resolution - this is exactly the country of africa, this shows that work needs to be done on this continent further, but there are already certain indicators of success i.e., during this time what has passed since the first intervention, and president zelenskyi held 17 conversations with african

leaders, and this tour of dmytro kuleba took place, the result is that there are regional, subregional the leaders of africa did not vote either, and morocco, which in march simply abstained or abstained during the vote for the resolution on the territorial unity of ukraine, now they supported ukraine, and all this happened just after zelenskyi’s telephone conversation with the president of angola and after the visit of kuleba de senegal, that is, this practice shows that such a strategy works , it should be continued in this way, and it is possible that even more african countries will be involved on the side of ukraine, in general, there are many friends among of african countries in ukraine yes, you listed maybe someone else and well, we can say that the fact that senegal, angola and morocco have now voted for the territorial integrity of ukraine is a great

success because this is a country that is trying to become leaders in its regions. it is one of the most powerful economies in africa, in total, approximately 3,000 african countries supported the territorial integrity of ukraine, ours, and four either abstained or, if they were absent during the vote, there are different countries, there are countries that maintained ties from the ussr and if they imagine that russia is the legal successor of the ussr, although this is absolute nonsense, and in terms of ideology, there are countries where military dictatorships rule, like maliburkas of the spirit, pro-russian military juntas, there are countries that are, in principle, assessed as authoritarian dictatorship regimes, for example, eritrea, by the way, regarding eritrea, it was the only country that actually voted against the territorial unity of ukraine in march. this time it abstained, which shows that africa is noticing certain changes that are happening now on the

ukrainian front and in eastern europe in general. as far as russia is concerned, the kremlin is now preparing itself with african countries in st. petersburg. so, african leaders can also try to be persuaded to approve the annexation of ukrainian territories . what can ukraine do to prevent this? ukraine announced back in july that it would really do everything to prevent the of this summit precisely so that african leaders would be present. at this summit, i expect that there will be again president zelenskyi's conversations with african letters, some conversations at the level it is really quite easy to convince the ministry of foreign affairs, because if you take the previous russia-africa summit in 2019, there were, for example, the heads of governments of countries such as mali brukinofasu, where are these people now? that is, the pro-russian military junta established there, these people have lost

power and there is such a thing question does russia hold summits in order to then simply deprive the africans who participate in the same of their power if they do not agree with them, that is, literally two weeks ago, there was a coup in burkina faso and one general, who was the head of the junta for 8 months, was removed, they said that he was not patriotic enough, and another was appointed . is happening, that is, it should be reminded that ah russia brings such instability to africa because mercenaries, russian mercenaries who are already present in four countries . they are not really interested in conflict resolution because they are the beneficiaries of these conflicts. they will receive money from these conflicts in those

ukrainian countries. this is either gold, diamonds , the opportunity to access natural resources for their use, and if these conflicts end, then of course they will have nothing to earn in these countries, that is, this is the effectiveness of involvement but the junta junta of mali and burkina faso are just now trying to attract russian mercenaries to solve the problem of jihadists in those countries , read on our website bbc.ua and that's all on today, look for more stories on our website bbc.ua and on our pages in social networks, and you can turn on our program already on monday rivne at 9:00 pm take care of yourself

samsky balsam zirka the first step in the treatment of colds a proven medicine and not a cosmetic mixture we will be healthy ask at trust vietnamese pharmacies only with proven medicinal products, we were born in the great hour