we had an election here between yushchenko and yanukovych, but then they wrote the same thing about the three types of ukrainians, all this nonsense . thank you to lviv who accepted our tv channel where we can work and where we go out with you here we talk and my colleagues who can be here also have the opportunity to work well and finally i will tell you one more thing here you see coffee we have everything we are fine so what let's give vietnamese balsam zirka, the first step in the treatment of colds is a proven medicine , not a cosmetic mixture, we will be healthy

. us anger and anger at the enemies and we are going in the battle of life , firm and strong unbreakable like granite because crying has not given freedom to anyone and whoever is a fighter wins the world does not want me glory no pay the pay for us this joy in the fight, let us die in battle, how to live in chains, like mini-slaves, ruins and disagreements are enough for us, we dare not. brother against brother, go in the game under the blue-yellow

flag of freedom. will be loyal to us who died ukraine is higher than everything leads us into battle fallen fighters glory for us the law is higher than the order the ukrainian cathedral state is free and strong from the sian to the caucasus in the cockpits of airplanes behind the monitors of radar stations at the points the management of anti-aircraft missile systems at thousands of combat positions throughout the territory of our country, they are bringing victory closer every day. kudos to the air force of the armed forces of ukraine.

i congratulate the voice of america ukrainian service program on the air. time and host ostap yarysh in the white house do not believe that the belarusian troops are preparing to join the russian offensive to ukraine the representative of the us national security council, john kirby, said this in an exclusive interview with the voice of america. they do not see such signs in washington, nor do they have evidence that putin has decided to use weapons of mass destruction, including tactical nuclear weapons, more about the latest assessments of russian full-scale war, let's talk with yulia yarmolenko, who is joining us now from the white house yulia i congratulate you i congratulate you you have been carefully following this topic yuliya what are the latest data announced in the us administration regarding the nuclear threat from russia ostap definitely takes the nuclear threat very seriously and is the first seriously because of this nuclear rhetoric of rattling

nuclear weapons, because in the united states they understand the weight of these words, but it is worth noting that this week president biden gave an interview to sean in which he said that he does not think that putin will go to use nuclear weapons in ukraine and the signs of this currently there is none, but he also emphasized that this nuclear rhetoric is completely irresponsible, it is also important to note in this context that in fact the president of baidu said that patagonia has a plan in case putin goes to the use of nuclear weapons, as we learned this week, european countries, nato countries, also have plans and will react immediately. if putin takes such actions, it is also important to note that today in the comments to our colleagues, the voice of america and representatives of the biden administration emphasized the fact that at the moment today there are no signs of preparations for a potential nuclear attack by russia, however, they emphasize that putin should immediately

stop nuclear rhetoric, because even rhetoric is dangerous, here are the exclusive comments representative of the state department and the national security council shag ford toua it is difficult to guess what putin is trying or what he will do so i cannot say for sure whether he will go for it what i can say is that he has a lot of bryantsev i am a stupid weapon that of course causes great concern all over the world and not only in the countries neighboring russia, therefore it is very important for us that russia stops rattling off nuclear weapons, that it does not threaten to use tactical nuclear weapons, that they recognize that this is in no one's interests, the weekend we let's say this as closely as we can, at the moment we do not see any, however, praising putin for the decision to use weapons of mass destruction or tactical or other nuclear weapons, we do not see any signs

that his armed forces are preparing for such use, and i would only add that we also at the moment , we do not see anything that would give us a reason to change our strategic position. the comments of the us administration are really important. yuli is talking about this. there is also an american expert and they mention that putin needs nuclear blackmail primarily in order to to intimidate the west and to achieve, perhaps, some kind of progress, what analysts' opinions have you paid attention to, many analysts say that in fact this is nuclear blackmail and nuclear rhetoric, it is a demonstration of weakness and not a demonstration of strength, because putin's other plans in ukraine are essentially failing and russian ones are succeeding there are not so many military personnel. moreover, in the past months, they have been talking about the fact that now, since there are no signs that russian russian troops are preparing for the potential use of nuclear weapons, then this putin's means of pressure is first of all on western countries to stop aid to ukraine, but also on

ukrainians in order to intimidate them, but he also says, they draw attention to the fact that for putin, any use of nuclear weapons or weapons of mass destruction will have catastrophic consequences, because it will entail a response from the west and this can turn out to be actually very terrible consequences, first of all for russia, here are the opinions of experts regarding potential e plans or potential opportunities a or threats, although western governments are wary and cautious about the possibility of using nuclear weapons by russia now there is no anxiety or panic because the russians have not yet taken any steps they should have taken to prepare for the use of nuclear weapons . to put pressure on ukraine to sit down at the negotiating table in the context of these

expert comments, is there a risk that the kremlin's tactics may work and that the western country is susceptible to nuclear threats of one degree or another ostap in the white house assures that nothing will change the position of the united states and its allies, that they will continue to help ukraine and help ukraine, in particular, with weapons as much as necessary, such statements were heard in particular and this week at the meeting of the contact group on the defense of ukraine in brussels, similar similar messages were heard after the meeting of the group of seven, which also took place this week, in particular, they emphasized that if any negotiations are to be held , they should be held on the terms of ukraine and that russia must withdraw its troops from ukraine without any preconditions. today our colleagues also asked john kirby red e-e from the representative of the us national security council again about what the escalation on the part of russia indicates and whether it can

intimidate ukraine or intimidate the west let's let's listen to what putin said. it is clearly not the actions of a confident leader, a leader who feels confident in how this war is being waged, it is brutal, it is bloody, it is ugly, and as the president said, it is in particular about war crimes and atrocities by putin deliberately pursues civilian targets and tries to kill ukrainian civilians not to mention their soldiers and he tries to instill fear in them but it has the opposite effect he helped unite nato he strengthened the resolve of the international community he absolutely did not instill fear in the hearts of the ukrainian people you could see how they sang on the subway after the terrorist attacks over the weekend, they took to the streets, they are brave, they are capable, they are determined, and the united states, with our allies and partners around the world, will continue provide security assistance to their armed forces so that

they can defend themselves and this week's meeting of the contact group in brussels was a great example of that we see nothing but the unity and determination of our allies in partners not only in europe but also in countries around the world to do everything they they can support ukraine and this continues. thank you very much for your information. we will really monitor how these events develop further. the world stood up for the protection of the un charter and for the protection of ukraine. this is how ukrainian post-presidency serhiy kislytsia commented on the adoption of the un resolution on the territorial integrity of ukraine, according to kislytsia, this resolution will help bring russia to justice in the future, but there

is still a lot of work to be done at the un level about the possibility of excluding russia and treason and also about the further steps of the united nations organization in support of ukraine, serhii kislytsia told in an exclusive interview with my colleague kateryna lisunova, see further let's start with the main basic information, what is the meaning of this resolution for ukraine, this resolution is of great importance for ukraine, because it is the only thing that exists in the world for countries like ours, which do not have nuclear weapons and do not have the economic power to defend themselves from the onslaught of the enemy on a scale that almost told the soviet union scale of the russian federation. and by the way, i want to remind you that the ukrainian diplomats in san francisco. let them be diplomats of

the ukrainian soviet socialist republic , but still they were from kyiv and headed the working the group that prepared the draft charter under the name of the principles and goals of the organization, therefore irony and fate and karma led to the fact that now the whole world stood up to defend the charter in defense of ukraine in defense of this part of the charter that was written under the leadership of the representative of ukraine in san francisco countries of the world from a practical point of view, the founding countries of the un could not explain to the audience why this resolution was needed, where, first of all, it debunked putin's myth that the world perceives negativity or perceives a narrative, let there be a little drills, but in the end the primarative that everything that the russian federation has done in the occupied

territories is in accordance with the principles of international law, you can see the explanations of debenzi 's quote. countries that have nothing to do with democracy , its international rules and respect for international law supported the narrative of the russian federation. it also becomes part of this resolution norms of the base let it even be a political isolation because in the theory of the united nations we must be and it is true that not all the decisions of the security council but nevertheless we have already seen examples in gaza and in strasbourg when the decisions of the general assemblies become part of the decision or

preparation of projects or the justification of the decisions of judicial international judicial bodies. i also assure you that at the national level, including in european courts, the decisions of the general assembly are taken into account, let's not to forget that one of the most important tracks of ukraine's work together with its partners is the track of antibiotide, i.e. prosecution, this resolution ticked all the boxes, and regarding the fact that the references of future lawyers of criminals who committed crimes on the territory of ukraine as part of this aggression will be null and void in relation to the next actions, what are the next ukraine's steps in the un and the europeans are starting right now and are already underway. the

third mineral committee has actually started its work. the third committee is a human right. to put it bluntly and for us, the main goal in the third committee every year since the illegal attempt to annex crimea is to pass a resolution on the situation with human rights in crimea. we will focus our efforts on this. in the near future, consultations with a group of partners will begin. we will introduce our resolution, this resolution is extremely important because that the crimean case is specific and even if and i have no doubts that it will happen we will expel the occupier from mainland ukraine, so the issue of crimea may still be with us for some time it is possible even after de-occupation, because the consequences are so deep and systemic that

overcoming the consequences that take place in crimea takes a certain amount of time, as well as the responsibility of the occupiers for what they did in crimea and not only in the field of human rights in the field of the same of the environment and other schools of thought, is there any progress towards removing russia from the security council or blocking its permanent membership , firstly, it is not a member of the pre-base according to the ukrainian side, it is present in the security council on in the place of the soviet union, this is a language that is not liked by other permanent members, who are really permanent members of the security council, because i said that i hear a request not to focus on this, so until the political position of the permanent members of the security council, in particular, the legal

blue, from their point of view, changes prospects for solving the issue of removing russia from the security council. i do not see that this can be a political decision, because it would then involve, among other things, the recognition of the fallacy of what they decided behind closed doors the decision in december 1991, when without holding any consultations of public meetings of the formal security council meetings of the general assembly without voting in the security council, which in the general assemblies of the beans of the soviet union closed the meeting of the villages of the soviet union and opened the next meeting of the cursor of russia no more systemic changes in security architectures 4 regional or global took place after regional or

world wars, so i think that given the extraordinary nature of the war of the russian federation against ukraine, and therefore against all civilized of the world as a result of the defeat of the military of the russian federation, the world will have no other way out but to take specific measures, including regarding the formulations related to the architecture of the global security architecture, otherwise it will be the defeat of the collective civilized world, otherwise it will be a repetition of those mistakes of a systemic nature that were made collective democratic world for 30 years and which led to the possibility of aggression of the russian federation against ukraine. this is how the interview with serhii kislytsia

in the meantime, five days have already passed since russia's massive missile attack on ukrainian cities , which killed 19 people, the strikes damaged 30% of the country's energy system, which led to significant interruptions and electricity supply, what is the current situation and what should ukrainians prepare for in winter, lesya bakalets explained russia fired 84 cruise missiles at ukrainian cities on october 10. because of one of them, the town of svitlany in the kyiv region would remain light , and the girl says that after the explosions, the power cut did not seem like a disaster, it really is absolutely well, not important things at the moment when you understand that it did not fly into your yard without light, it is possible, but the light was given on the same day. then for two more days, it turned off in an emergency for a couple of hours and the energy situation in the town stabilized . there are no more emergency shutdowns e- e in kyiv,

kyiv region and western ukraine, where they were applied, today most consumers can use the network in normal mode, preliminary repair of damage according to the forecasts of ukrainian energy experts they can finish it already within the next week , it was immediately visible more precisely the level of entry, yes well, i will tell you that this is the level of damage that allows for immediate repairs, that is, tuesday next wednesday, and in principle, these objects that have been damaged in this way must carry out immediate repairs and, accordingly , they ukraine was ready, experts say, all summer energo ukrenergo was preparing all summer ukrenergo was preparing 700 people worked only with ukrenergo and in in the regions, there are regional companies, the distributors also stocked up in order to quickly repair everything, this is

professionalism, this is the professionalism of repairmen, we have dead repairmen who went out to the object, which was flown again and at least two people were killed, several were injured, oleksandr kharchenko is sure that the russian federation planned missile attacks with the participation of its energy workers, since the strikes were mainly on nodal substations, and in the unification of the energy system that ukraine has, they play a critical role. those energy systems are conditionally speaking of nerve nodes, these are transformer substations , they play a fantastically important role because it is thanks to them, er, when part of this nervous system, part of these nerves, high-voltage electricity transmission lines are destroyed, or destroyed, or some er, substations are destroyed. this makes it possible to bypass destroyed areas and restore consumers due to others, on the day after the attacks,

ukraine suspended the export of electricity except for the damaged thermal power plants, one of the four ukrainian nuclear power plants , occupied zaporizhzhia, is now in a state of cold stoppages and its internal needs for electricity under such circumstances ukraine is closed until emergency energy for the functioning of ukrenergo is responsible for the functioning of the unified energy system, they have developed various scenarios for the production of consumption for the autumn-winter period and under the condition of operation of the power plant without it, even without it we we will extract exactly the remaining capacity if nothing additional will be destroyed now 9 power units in the territory under the control of ukraine out of nine units one is under repair and one is working on 50%."

of your products, if only separately, it should always be, we will winter over. it will be difficult for us, but we will definitely win in this, we know how and we know what to do ukrainians to save electricity, especially during the peak hours from five to nine in the evening, well, closer to the night, at least after ten o'clock for this we choose the night mode, which in itself is quite economical. when there is no light, i can not turn on the washing, but at these hours i can do it during the day and at night

. in order to improve the situation in the country only on the first day of savings, according to ukrenergo, residents of kyiv and the region voluntarily reduced their electricity consumption by 26.5%." estonia was one of the first countries to recognize russia's actions in ukraine as genocide. this week, in the parliament of this country, draft resolutions were introduced that recognize russia as a state sponsor of terrorism. in addition , the estonian authorities announced the transfer of winter equipment, equipment and ammunition to ukraine to support ukraine's nuclear blackmail of russia. and the future of ukraine in nato the journalist of the georgian voice of america service who

recently spoke with the estonian foreign minister urvas reisalo used nuclear threats now putin declares that he is not bluffing, he is ready to defend his own territories, what do you think these threats mean for ukraine, for russia, for the west, how do they change the situation, or can these threats i hope not. if some country and the western community decide to surrender because of these nuclear threats, we are faced with a big i think the problem is that putin will continue to escalate. regardless of whether it will be nuclear exercises, which we have already seen, there is also some news about the maneuvering of nuclear equipment or a statement to

stop trade, he is also trying to take the zaporizhia nuclear power plant hostage, demonstrating that he can resort to nuclear terror and also hit civilian nuclear targets located on ukrainian soil, so the main task of his bluff is to turn the war into at least a partially non-nuclear conflict on the part of russia, i think that the united states gave a strong and clear response. it is a deterrent to russia and a clear message that the price for putin will be deadly if he crosses the border into ukrainian lands of nuclear intimidation . ukraine has applied for nato membership. what do you think remains on the table ? putin is now losing the battle and this means that the west must deliver a clear message that we are going to increase the

price that the putin regime will pay. in my opinion , there are several options for this, the first is the strengthening of sanctions and we have seen that the european union has just adopted the eighth package of sanctions, and secondly, the further increase in the supply of heavy weapons to ukraine . should be delivered to ukraine by one of the countries that support ukraine's membership in nato. you also stated that it is not about whether ukraine will become a member of nato, but about when it will happen under what circumstances, in your opinion, this the process will develop bring ukraine today to family i hope that this will bring ukraine to nato i am the decision that was made 14.5 years ago when renato left in

bucharest they clearly stated that georgia and ukraine will become members of nato i hope that nato leaders will discuss and also give a green signal for further steps on this path, of course. everyone understands included with ukraine and all parties that, first of all, this is a path to improvement, and secondly, ukraine will not become a member of nato tomorrow, when ukraine submitted an application, the president the accession of finland and sweden has shown that it is not necessary to simply mechanically follow the plan for membership, the process can be made easier due to improvements. i think this is a strong argument for consideration. energy russia uses energy , disinformation and other hybrid resources that will influence our public opinion. in the west, will increased prices be able to the energy crisis and other problems affect public opinion and support for the west of ukraine we do not need to be afraid and do not be

deceived we must understand that there is no current alternatives from our point of view, from the point of view of the baltic countries and all freedom-loving countries, ukraine must win and russia must lose. it is also important to determine how russia will lose this war . of course, russia must abandon all territorial annexations and occupations they carried out against ukraine. this will also be the end. putin's regime, its fall, would europe dare to sleep peacefully in their beds if it was a frozen conflict or if putin won no, it is impossible, we would not be able to look into the future mirror because we will be ashamed that we were not able to protect the freedom of one country so i think there is no alternative to increasing support for everyone the beast

is now in a very easy situation let's remember how the soviet union collapsed very quickly as a very centralized organization it can happen very quickly there is a place on earth which is waiting for putin and his henchmen, this tribunal wants to officially recognize russia as a state to support terrorism , just diplomatically and on a practical level, i think that the fight against islam begins when there is courage truthfully and objectively assess what is happening at the beginning of april, the parliament of estonia was the first parliament in the world to recognize this war as genocide against the people and statehood of ukraine. what they are doing around the world funding proxy armies