this is how it turns out that in such a short period of time there are so many cases, they were already ready, they were waiting for signatures, that's why in this case nabu well, how do you say that nabu works institutionally? you understand the fact that they don't have a head. affairs a-a persons of top officials and even from the president's entourage everything is normal everything works a-a what was missing here was a prosecutor we got a prosecutor and now you see such a large volume of bodies a-a how do our people look at it a-a western partners, of course, this is exactly what they wanted, that is why they did not talk so often and so loudly about the election of a new prosecutor for the position of the head of sap, and we now see the results for them . it is now possible to trust some significant sums of money, because if someone steals, then these are the nabu and the sap, which , as we see, work quickly to slap people on the hands, and that is, it is a question of trust and uh, question

trust between us and our western partners, however , it is still necessary to understand that there is a large amount of work ahead of us, and no one is going to give us hundreds of billions of dollars without a clear understanding that this money will not be a conversation. the correct comment regarding this situation, everything is clearly balanced and understandable. marko savchuk, the head of the public control council, worked live on the espresso tv channel together with khrystyna yatskivva and is now in touch with us agia, a lawyer from zagreb, state commissioner of the antimonopoly committee of ukraine from 2015 to 2019. agia, we congratulate you. glory to ukraine. congratulations to the heroes. glory to the heroes. there are always so many topics that i can and would like to talk about with you, but somehow it seems to me that this week's topic has not been deservedly noticed. adoption of the new national security strategy of the

united states of ukraine this month, the white house published a new strategy that identified the main strategic threats to the united states and the main focus of this document is on ways countering the threats coming from the rivals of the usa in fact it is china and russia and iran and the dprk and other authoritarian regimes the document does not actually contain any hints that washington should be interested in transforming the regimes of other countries into e-democracies that will make you feel safer well, the text for now different are proposals that strong and stable democracies themselves show their effectiveness and america will contribute to this, so what did you see in this document if you already had time to familiarize yourself with them and how clearly there is between the lines the name of our state is read and i really liked how you said the united states of ukraine

yes yes gradually gradually yes i really liked saying so you know we have been waiting for this document for a long time and it just didn't come out because of russia's war against ukraine because of this invasion they postponed it because they were worried that the security environment could change significantly, accordingly, significant changes would have to be made to this document, and now they finally published it and we don't even have time to read it until the end of which we are already waiting for a new document on the national defense strategy of the united states, where more attention will be paid to the military component . and if we talk about this document, so much attention is paid to russia, journalists even counted how many times the word china, russia, iran and north korea are mentioned, and china is of course the leader in any case, because they believe that the

chinese are the biggest threat, this threat is a challenge that is developing, but in second place are russia and iran and north korea, journalists even wrote that they believe that they are unjust is so little mentioned, although there is also a significant threat from them, russia is mentioned as an urgent challenge, and it is also mentioned very often, second only to china, and this indicates how much attention is paid by the united states is the war waged by russia and the strategy is built on that on partnership, this is necessarily at the center of this strategy, the older united states must a-a develop partnerships and partnerships both within the country that concern partnerships between citizens, partnerships between the public and private sectors, as well as partnerships externally, that is, with e-e allies with partners on different continents, the commission understands that partners as such have different statuses, and here the

question is how powerful is the status of the partnership of the united states. well, they we would not have formulated it differently, even we would be something and not a partner, and here, accordingly, the question is what the united states is obliged to do in the event of an increase in the level of escalation, well, in particular, it is about providing us with the help well, because we understand the world of international capitalism, as the classics of marxism -leninism said at one time, it is quite so rigid, and the united states demonstrates that it is committed to the ideals of democracy, it actually supports it, but the status of our partnership and what prospects it can be strengthened as soon as possible in recent years 50 more than 50 years since the war in vietnam in vietnam, the united states has not provided such a volume and in monetary equivalent in kind equivalent of aid to any country as it is provided today

therefore, it seems to me that this quite clearly demonstrates the level of partnership that exists today between the united states and ukraine, and what's more, even at the briefing, there were questions about the fact that certain types of defense equipment will be provided to taiwan and delayed a little later due to the fact that this defense equipment is provided to ukraine, so in my opinion, this demonstrates, er, our significant partnership status that we have. regarding its development, you know, i think we should return to this issue after the united states passes elections, when we will see how the congress will be formed, because in any case, the development of partnership in such a democracy as the united states is impossible without the active participation of the congress in this matter, accordingly, it will have to be discussed with this ordinary administration, but including with the new composition of the congress, and at the same time,

i am running right up front, i will say that i do not think that in terms of support from the united states and ukraine after the november elections, there are any significant people who the republicans think otherwise. that is how the voices are heard we understand, for example, we are talking about the republican mccartney, who said that everything can change significantly in terms of money, whether americans can pass a similar test after the election . well, here we need to understand the circumstances in which mccartney said this as a minority leader and as a candidate for the position of speaker in congress in the event that the republicans get the majority of the votes and taking into account the fact that the republican party is divided into two parts in terms of support for ukraine, most of them can be called hawks - this is those who support ukraine, who vote for defense aid to ukraine, who even call on the

united states, the white house, the pentagon to give more weapons, more powerful weapons . like america first and a, who are the leaders of the idea that the united states should deal more with internal issues and less with external issues, and that's exactly how makart is the one who does not belong to the trembian wing. he i just voted for help to ukraine, but now he is making such an ambiguous statement for several reasons, firstly because he needs to get the position of speaker for him as a speaker, i understand that they will vote for republicans if they get a majority, of course, and for this he will need to gather votes as a trump wing so are the wings of hawks, and therefore in order to

somehow satisfy them at least. she was and remains and will be. that there should be reporting, and this is where he doesn't run away from the fact that it's a blank check, that there should still be proper reporting from the side of ukraine, and so on. well, they like it, so i don't think that's the problem and third, why are the republicans always on the hook? well, the democrats are actually talking about this today, and the minister of finance, janet, is there, but he is talking about it, and the pentagon is talking about it, and the other members of nato, other partners of the united states in canada, they should also help ukraine more because today we have a situation where the defense aid that comes from the united states is more than the defense aid that comes from all other countries taken together and of course individual congressmen - this is a little disturbing. why does the united

states bear such significant costs and other nato members, especially those that are on the european continent, for whom russia is the biggest threat. why don't they bear at least the approximate costs, so i think that this statement by mccartney was also aimed at motivating partners the united states should help ukraine more actively, well, in any case, it is interesting whether this topic and this alcohol will become a kind of cornerstone for e- americans and for europeans. well, for now, we note that precisely from the e-e member countries of the european union, there is reaction to iran's involvement in the example of the military component of the conflict on our continent if you can say so, the ambassadors of the european union member states on wednesday approved sanctions against iran for its supply of destruction to russia that is used in the war against ukraine

in general, the north atlantic alliance has no doubt that iran supplies drones to russia, they are monitoring the further development of events, in particular, the actions of tehran, janstoltenberg declares this. i never talk about specific intelligence, but i can say that there is everything that indicates that iran supplies russia drones, in any case, many have already said and are saying that the eu sanctions against iran are very specific, they are actually sanctions against individual companies involved in these drones, against individual individuals, and we see that some kind of consistent position of an already matured position regarding iran's subsaction in the future. there is still no idea what needs to happen in order for it to mature and whether it is in the interests of the world that is suffering from the energy crisis. oil is also a factor. i

think it should not be allowed into on wednesday or tuesday, i don't remember exactly when there was a closed meeting of the un security council, at which the united states of great britain and france were both members of the council and those who signed the nuclear agreement in the morning the question was raised about the early violation by iran of resolution e 22:31, if i am not mistaken, its number e-e of 2015 of the un security council, which just approved this nuclear agreement a-a and what is the violation in that this resolution 22-31 it obliges prohibits it is too early to supply certain types of weapons to any country without the permission of the un security council and considering that these drones have a range of more than 300 km, they just fall under this category, which is prohibited, and this is where it is developing, now interesting things will begin to develop

events why, because a violation of the resolution should trigger un security council sanctions on iran directly, and this is exactly what the sanctions will be much more severe. separate resolutions on russia, this is one story, but when iran supplies russia with weapons and there is evidence of this, then accordingly we should have seen from china a vote for and only one vote against russian and that's right. it seems to me that now these statements that we hear which are aimed at making it clear that this is iran, these are iranian drones, and we have evidence, and these are symbolic, as you say. in order to record that there is evidence and there are official documents that state

that because the closed meeting took place, they discussed it and they took a time-out in order to collect evidence, give more information and meet again, so i think that the main battle also with regard to sanctions, it will be deployed more in the un, plus today we know that it is not still these drones, that is, there is information about what other drones may be arash, there is information about short-range ballistic missiles and there is a problem in iran with by the fact that it does not have a land corridor. and it cannot move these short-range ballistic missiles in the sky, and it cannot move them by sea because it is too risky. there will be too much evidence that it is iran . there is a risk that certain ships may be damaged. and so on, and in order to transfer them by land, he needs to take them through the territory of

armenia, through the territory of azerbaijan, and all countries , as i understand it, do not give iran permission to do this. in the minsk language it is called within the framework of the european union regarding the reconciliation between azerbaijan and armenia and today we really see such significant pushes in the direction of reconciliation , so there is a high risk for iran that now azerbaijan and armenia will sign peace and what azerbaijan will have direct access to its nakhchivan region and through the armenian territory without the involvement of iran, and then iran will be completely isolated from russia by land, and this is where the most interesting thing will begin. we will see how iran a will live when it will not have a land corridor to russia at all. and to europe as well, that is, he will be surrounded on all sides by our partners, in any case, we understand that now gram still wants to get into the

armenia-azerbaijan conflict and i support it in every way now the armenian version has been shared. as they say, god is with him, the company. i would like to ask you more about the essence of the conversation, we understand that it is extremely difficult to interpret when there is a lack of information. the conversation took place in may, and even then, this conversation did not really bring anything, now if we open the pentagon website, they have already confirmed that this conversation took place because the first communication was i understand that it was from the russians and a friend already from the pentagon . the pentagon communicates quite dryly about the fact that a-a laziness a-a emphasized the need to keep communication channels open a-a therefore, it is possible that this is another conversation that is often

talked about by the united states the states that we believe that the military should talk to each other in order to avoid miscalculations, there were some data that russia is again rattling these nuclear weapons in the black sea. maybe they talked about this. yesterday was the statement of volodymyr zelensky before that, the publicists of the institute for the study of war about what russia is planning to do when it will make a gesture of goodwill in the south and blow up dam a at the kakhov hpp, turning it into a false flag operation. maybe they are the question, but i don’t think so. that this conversation will bring some results. that is, today we are definitely not at the stage a at which there may be some results on the part of the dsk of latsia, and therefore i would not expect so much from them. thank you, agia zagreb lawyer, state representative of the anti-monopoly committee of ukraine in 15-19 years,

which is extremely well-versed in international affairs and monitors daily what is happening outside the borders of our state, when it is a simple sin to ask our e-e tv viewers to subscribe to social networks in asia, always high-quality analytics well, and on our air also well, we are taking a step further and we are now carefully following the political life in great britain, where the name of the prime minister of lease-trans is due to change in the near future, for now it remains to fulfill these duties and with we are in touch with igor kharchenko, diplomat , extraordinary plenipotentiary ambassador of ukraine in great britain from 2005 to the 10th year, mr. igor, we congratulate you glory to ukraine glory to you i'm curious were you surprised by yesterday's statement by alistra about what constitutes the powers of the prime minister - minister, to be

honest, no, because if you follow the english political life, it is a good thing to follow the english political life, then in the history of britain , elections rarely happen, including elections important party leaders, well, in the last couple of weeks, britain has been shaking before everything for internal political, even internal economic reasons, we will not go into details, but uh, well, i will say yes, i expected these statements, it is only about the strength of the state institutions of great britain, because for those uh let's say, according to the canons and traditions that have developed in the political life of the british over the last 200 years, in principle, upon such a statement

, mr. ambassador, the prospect of returning to the post of former prime minister boris johnson. so, what do you think this competition from the decision-maker represents? that is, i don't have anything personal, as they say, but we remember that sunak was, so to speak, among those who supported the resignation of boris johnson, the least that i would now i deeply wanted to comment on the internal political clashes in the conservative party of great britain, because it seems to me that what interests us, even ukrainians here, is primarily the question of whether britain will maintain that absolutely clear course of all kinds of support for ukraine in this

the just war we are waging and the answer to this question. life and i e it seems to me that the common political sense of the british is enough to find in this situation a worthy candidate who could represent the conservative party e-e today e-e britain as the party of the ruling party, although for this is what we are the last poles of. as far as i understand, the conservatives are now, let's say, lagging behind

their traditional opponents in the liberal party quite significantly, therefore. there are a lot of domestic political issues. but we are interested in one thing, and on this issue it seems nobody can have any ships, but there are doubts about the embassy and i do not agree with you because i understand what is the role of a person in history, what is the role of the prime minister of great britain during on the eve of a possible third world war, we understand how much the position of great britain changed at the end of the 30s after the reshuffle, for example, after the resignation of the very same mr. chamberlain, and we also understand that the churchillian position, which was not nurtured over the years, but it appeared in glimpses, then disappeared the fact that certain pertubations took place also has an effect, and that is why i simply cannot assess what this

thing and sunak is, but we in ukraine know very well what johnson's borscht is, and it is simple the fear that due to some behind-the-scenes decisions , extremely powerful british aid may be curtailed, although at the level of rhetoric everything will remain very good and we will be slapped with a brush , so to speak i will be very brief, now the situation is radically different from the point of view of, let's say, the array of political, which has already been developed in britain today from 200, even i would say in the 14th year, especially after february 24 of the current year on the issues of ukraine compared to that what we had in 1939 in 1938 if you remember

berlin and so on. but your example is very eloquent because where was churchill in 1938-19, whom you mentioned, he painted pictures and wrote the history of the first world war, it seems the so -called famous velodors of the eu, that is, he expelled the political but why did i mention in my first comment that the common sense of the british political public, er, the british political public instantly understood then that um, when let's just say, the rooster pecked already in the uh, 40 that year you need exactly the one for such matters, exactly who churchill had more enemies than friends among politicians from all camps, but it was precisely this person that britain needed. at that time, and the british were not mistaken, the war ended, churchill was sent

after literally a few weeks. and today we have a situation when great britain and the united states of america are the two guarantors of the famous uh-uh budapest memorandum uh-uh, which ukraine together with him, i was in budapest on the day when this memorandum was signed, i was part of a small delegation, i remember it perfectly john wager, who was sitting, and also this clinton , american president yeltsin, boris mykolayovych , signed all this, the signature of the prime minister of great britain on even such a political document is still the signature of the prime minister of great britain, and the signature of... e head of the british government for the political history of great britain means the signature of the e-e british prime minister

and if there is at least some commitment and the commitment is even though they are political but this commitment will be the name of the new sonata or the name of the new prime minister there will be an era we do not yet know the conservative parties of britain quite well. i would say that the situation with the election of a new leader is diplomatically difficult. as i understand when i follow english events, i have a deep conviction that this issue, which is key for us from the issue of support to ukraine, is of cardinal importance. hmm, it won't happen, of course we know boris johnson as full of wolves, and of course, as soon as the news appeared that he interrupted his vacation and returned to the rotation in order to join the pre- election race, of course we have emotional such an element about ielbet, let's see, constantine's

party has a very long tradition, elections are not such a simple matter, of course, a political matter because britain is a traditional democracy, but for any results of this race, i think that i have such an opinion that we do not have to be let's say so very alarmed that the role of the individual in history in this particular situation will somehow turn badly on us, they think your opinion is shared by the americans, representatives of the state department, deputy spokesperson vidala patel stated what happened in political life of the united states in the near future, if the leadership of the country does not change. they will continue to support ukraine militarily and financially in the future. but at the same time, we understand the importance of such a position as the minister of defense of great britain, for example, ben volos, who

also just recently he was on the lists of those who can become the prime minister. well, it would seem that today he signaled that he will most likely stay where he is now, and he is more likely to gravitate towards the support of boris johnson. by the way, ben ah vulis was recently in the united states of america. and he told the parliament that there is no reason to worry about his urgent trip to meet with allies in the united states, and what do you think? that is , isn't ben voles reassuring us, and in fact, in this conversation, important things for ukraine could have come up of course, important things for ukraine were raised, it seems to me that of course we are concerned about everything that in one way or another is related to the issues of military support in this situation, especially from our main allies. they already have a big secret the british americans all points of view are our

main allies today it seems to me now uh there is no reason no reason to doubt uh that this support will continue because let's say the policies and actions of our last enemy the moscow regime during the last few weeks they are already in principle, er, these policies and actions led to the fact that er, from the so -called conflict between ukraine and russia, modern russian politics has already outgrown the framework of the conflict to two countries, it has even outgrown it already the framework of a purely conflict in europe is already a conflict of civilization, it may not be called so directly in official documents, but it seems to me that the leadership of those countries that are

supporting us today already understands this very well, and i owe it to the leadership of the countries of the group rammstein thank you, mr. ambassador, for this comprehensive analysis broadcast on the espresso tv channel. unfortunately , we now have khrystyna to pass the word to our colleagues. ihor kharchenko worked as a diplomat , extraordinary plenipotentiary ambassador of ukraine in britain in 5-10 years well, then the broadcast of the espresso tv channel, including our colleagues from radio svoboda, will bring to your attention their projects, we should be silent at this moment, we can talk.