that is, uh, well, people understand that the lukashenko regime unleashed this war against ukraine, uh, together with putin, and constantly provokes the ukrainian authorities to respond, that is, this is the understanding of the people. thank you for participating in today's one program. thank you for your frankness honest answers that helped us ukrainians understand certain issues, and i wish you and us all the best. thank you, it was nataliya radina, a belarusian journalist. i want to remind everyone who is watching us now on youtube, please like it if you like it don't like it if you don't like it though i really hope you like it and vote for us today voting ah why did russia accuse ukraine of creating a dirty atomic bomb and three options for answers russia is preparing a provocation to convince the west to stop giving weapons well and your

option vote join now i will try to find at least how do you vote 84 so the percentages tell me that russia is preparing a provocation on the second question to convince the west to stop giving 10% voted for weapons in ukraine. well, the rest of us all voted, obviously, and you can read your options on our youtube page. so, let’s move on to another topic . iranian drones are doing a lot of damage to ukrainian cities , ukrainian civil infrastructure in many regions of ukraine, electricity supply has not been fully restored. and even fan shutdowns were introduced and all because of these iranian death birds about it why iran gives it well and how can we

still before can we convince iran not to do this, i will talk to my next guest , this is igor semegolovets, director of the center for middle eastern studies. congratulations, mr. igor. congratulations. drones, and even more so missiles about which information has appeared, the fact is that the iranians claim that they do not transfer them, and this is the first problem we face because but one thing is when we work from a country that transmits admits this fact and accordingly it is possible to negotiate with this country on what conditions it will do this, it will not be a different thing when we know that

it is transferred drones actively instructors participate directly in the war against ukraine nato places the country is asserted panorama so, although the behavior shows that in fact there are no legitimate ways of pressure or persuasion of this country not to do so. the way to solve this problem is the destruction of drones, that is, the provision of a sufficient number of effective anti-aircraft weapons, the development and system of early warning of the approach of those ships and frantic

air defense. the special services are countering directly either in iran or abroad by structures to people who are involved in the development of the use and application of weapons, i.e. mr. ihor, you mean that sanctions will not affect iran in any way now. and this is to stop the to stop the supply of weapons to it, and of course sanctions, in any case, sanctions have a limited term, and that is, if sanctions are applied now in relation to specific drones of specific weapons, then the effect may be noticeable only there. that is, we perfectly understand that those sitting there are not stupid either, they are also stocking up, in addition, we have some uh possibilities plus uh

maximum diversification plus i understand that this is uh cooperation of several countries and we have already understood that here we already have at least the second cooperation of china, russia, and together, that is, in this sense . well, it's so simple. you can't do it, they're a game, but there was information that israel bombed the factory at which these weapons and other iranian weapons were manufactured with a pinpoint strike. territory of syria. i understand correctly that this is not their main factory. it is just one of the factories. is it still the main one? i assume that it was just in the barn where they assembled a few drones. that is, in principle, this is all absolutely not, it is not the main enterprises. it's just some kind of very, very limited assembly shop, that is, you shouldn't be happy after receiving this information. well, unfortunately, i would still like it to be a large factory

that was hit so well, but, unfortunately, now let's talk about the iranian instructors who were on the territory. well, they are on the territory of ukraine, but some of them were already there because our army sent them to the other world, so the killing of the iranian instructors will change something , so iran will say no. sorry we will stop sending our instructors because you do not provide them with adequate security is a good question . as far as i understand now, the iranians have already thought about it and they want to transfer part of their designers to belarus because you think that they will be safe in belarus and from there belarus will not welcome ukrainian missiles that will kill them, that is, so far, so far, the destruction of several dozens of

iranian instructors has such an effect so far, that is, they are reworded, but obviously it is not affects the very fact of their presence and willingness to help the russians to influence the ukrainians. the secretary of state of the united states of america, anthony blinken , said on friday that tehran, according to the data of american and not only intelligence, intends to transfer to the russian army even more drones of these shaheds, which then russia redraws the names and calls them geraniums, and even these missiles seem to have a medium range that fly kilometers, so look for cooperation with russia for tehran. at this stage, it’s simple business or something, geopolitics is no longer business, it is no

longer business, yes, of course, business had a place here, yes, and i think that for a certain time, maybe he occupied the lion's share of the space in conversations with the russians, yes , because hmm, i think that the first before moving on to geopolitics, it was necessary if they were to be involved, that is, that they should find themselves in certain circumstances in which it was very difficult to get out, and i think there were two moments - the first, to be more precise , their politics was immediately present in addition to money i think it's raw because as of now basically russia handed over sicily to iran, practically all of this control. yes, that is, we have er, that the iranians control almost completely the series and er, so when there was a conversation about er, well, there was definitely no

talk about the formation of the axis, about the formation of the alliance, but now in those in the circumstances, we see what it is. yes , they are already creating an alliance, and this is already the next step , that is, the calculation of the russians was correct, first let them bury the money, relatively speaking, and increase the influence in the patch, and then go to the level of the strategic alliance, and as a result, the iranians fell into such a strategic trap from which well, so far, in our situation, i do not see iran, at the same time, wants to become well, a driving force, one of the key players in the region, so they do not want to be, and they dreamed of it and they had all the chances for this and i think that uh, let's be honest, in the 15th year of the agreement, the agreement gave them uh, tubes , tools to achieve this very goal, money and resources that they used, including for the

production of missile coffins and for expansion in the region and it sounded most powerfully and suddenly just after in the 15th year after the signing of the nuclear agreement, and since then, it seems to me that the iranians have over-extended their efforts and overestimated their capabilities. and the first riots began early. and now they are already taking the form of large riots and, in essence, the anti-shiite anti-islamic movement, the anti-yetov movement, the anti-regime movement, that is, what is happening now in iran is a consequence of those tensions and that the overstrain that iran went through on the way to

expansion in the far east, you already started talking about these riots, i just wanted to ask you about them, but there is some kind of future in them, because there were riots in iran in the history of modern iran in the modern and early there were many and all they suppressed uh-uh regime when we talk about um when we are dealing with such a country as iran where do these nkvd troops exist? well, i mean the sports corps of the men's revolution 10 million of all the hundreds that are there basij and many other things yes that is, those that are the support of the regime is quite powerful and it seems that in those conditions there is no point in even dreaming about a possible success, on the other hand, we perfectly understand that iran is a country of 80 million people and it cannot be changed from the outside, yes, or changes are possible if they

can they can come only from the inside, based on this, it is elementary, yes , there was logic, it is clear that hmm, there were many riots in the toilets, but i will try to list the differences, which ones did not exist before, the first difference is that the riots took place within the framework of the so-called islamic islamic political system, that is, the people protested, but they proceeded from the fact that it is not possible to touch the framework. well, if only to make it clear to ukrainians that conditionally you cannot touch communism, communism can be good, but executive communism is a lot there would have been a time when anti-communist movements appeared and which

demanded the destruction of the framework, then it began to rain, the same thing is happening now, the first is the first riots, where the actual questioning is the frame itself, and the second point is that not only urban riots are involved in all riots, there are also strata that are easy to rise and that traditionally participate in such riots, and national minorities and the national outskirts join those rioters. and this is very important from the point of view of a further further the development of this uprising, and here i can say the uprising, because in the direction of the state of the silent stable, we are no longer dealing with six on filial actions, but already with an uprising, and the third point is that in those uprisings, in these disturbances, the working class is involved, it is also not often it happens in iran and recently the strikes

that we see are becoming wider and workers are joining them, and this is well, the strike movement is becoming powerful in principle, and the women's movement has never before been such a women's movement as we have now, and this is essentially it destroys all the bonds of the regime . that is, it is everything in the middle of this regime. the last thing i can say is that it is also new. it is the bazaar . that is, it is the people of the bazaar, it is the small traders who were usually the basis of the regime, and if you can remember the islamic revolution, it is exactly markets were those who actively supported the islamic regime and they were often used as a countermeasure to any students there, and therefore now the bazaars i

also actively support, well, it is significant or i will not claim about all of them, but a significant number of bazaars support the protesters, economic troubles, drought, uh, the results of covid expansion is an unpopular war and war is not popular. so, all of this, in general, of course, creates a completely new situation that has never existed before, well, it is really a new situation and i still want something in them something came out this time. thank you, mr. igor, for joining my program and for giving professional answers to my questions and clarifying the sections that are difficult for me and my viewers to understand. i will remind you that ihor simogolov was with me - the director of the institute for native studies well , i'm ready to introduce my new guest. but before that, i'll remind you once again that e, please

put your likes if you like the program and dislike if you don't like the program, although i really hope that like and write something, it is important for us and for the promotion of the program. well, vote in our vote today. why did russia accuse ukraine of creating a dirty atomic bomb? at the moment , 341 people have already voted. 83% believe that russia is preparing a provocation. vote for ukraine 12% and your option five percent you still have about 15 minutes, we will tally up the results at the end of the program. mr. igor, thank you very much for joining. good health. i congratulate you. i am always glad. igor well, you served as ambassador to great britain. you know this country very well. please tell me today,

rather, yesterday evening there was information that boris johnson will take part in the premier race penny mordan most likely today by 4:00 p.m. kyiv will not get enough votes from conservative members of parliament and there will be only one candidate rishi sunak former head of the british ministry of finance and since he will one, today after 2:00 p.m. it is quite likely that he will become the new prime minister of great britain p ihor tell me, please, something will change for ukraine p ihor you heard me, the connection was interrupted, then i repeat my question again . you know great britain because you served there as an ambassador and here, er, about the elections

, er, at the moment, johnson said that he is withdrawing his candidacy, penny mordan says that she is moving on, but it is unlikely that she will receive enough votes today by 16:00 kyiv time support conservative parliamentarians and there will only be one thing left, and sunak is the former head of the british ministry of finance. please tell me with a high probability that he will become the next prime minister of great britain. for us, for ukraine, something will change. i don't think that anything will change for us. in the general strategic approach of great britain, because today the question of ukraine's support for britain's independence is a matter of conservatives, liberals or liberal democrats , it is a matter of political consensus, and elections party members in the same conservative party that is currently in power, or in the

liberal-democratic party or in some other party, there are a lot of them left in the party of active and represented parliaments of britain, so internal party problems britain has built a sufficiently viable political system for many years which is able to cope with any domestic political challenges. and the issue of ukraine is not an internal political challenge, it is a foreign political challenge surrounding foreign political challenges, the history of britain shows that the british the public always unites, it seems to me that the case of the country is exactly the same case. that is, you mean because in our country you understand when boris johnson resigned from the post of prime minister. everyone said boris, who are you throwing us at? to the post of prime minister who said thank god that this is a forest trust and not a rascal, but it should not be said correctly, the support of britain will remain,

of course, the support of britain will remain, but we are used to saying everything that we think, do you understand that we have such a psychotype in ukraine closer to well, let's say so the mediterranean team of the civilization of the british is a little different, they say less but do more and that is why, once again, i sign the election of the leader of the conservative party of britain. he knows better about financial problems because of his portfolio, which he held in the same conservative government, so it's the same with us again the connection with mr. igor kharchenko has been lost. now

we will try to connect with him again. well, he will obviously agree, he should have agreed on what he said about the decision of sunak, who, as i said, is the ex-head of the ministry of finance of great britain and, as mr. igor said, he he is well-versed in british money, perhaps more than anyone. and i personally fear that, knowing how much of this money there is in great britain, he would not say at some point that people are good, and maybe it is enough to spend this money on ukraine, well at least not as much as we spend , maybe it's worth it, why, for example, the prime minister, the backstage highway, why the minister, the prime minister, canister resigned because she could not overcome the severe economic crisis that is currently in great britain, i am very i'm afraid that sunak just said that in order to overcome this strong, very

big economic crisis in great britain, we will use the money we have in our country primarily for the citizens of great britain, and, of course, then we will give this money for ukraine, mr. ihor, they told me that they have already restored contact with you, you can continue what they said, i also say that uh, it's all started. let 's leave the british internal political issues to the british where the issue concerns universal human values, and the issue of ukraine's struggle against russian aggression from the british point of view, i believe it is a universal human value with which there is a consensus in british society and in the society mainly and in most civilized countries of the world, then we have nothing to fear from the point of view of what is possible from the change of the leader the politics of the party or the government will change. no, i don't think it will happen. then let

's talk about another country, about the united states of america, and in particular about whether we should be afraid of what is happening there, and there is such a kind of split in the republican party. some representatives of this party say that everything after all, we need to review aid to ukraine so that we give too much to ukraine and spend too little on solving our own problems. in early november, there will be mid-term elections to the congress and there with a high degree of probability, the majority can be obtained, the majority can be obtained by the republicans. is this, uh, hmm, should we be alarmed in any way, i don't think that we should be alarmed, the american political system is, let's say, not as traditionally old as the british one, but it is also uh, persistent despite the fact that a few years ago, we had very serious internal political

events in the united states of america related to the activities of the previous president. but it seems to me that there are always questions that somehow find a response from the voters, and today ukraine definitely finds a response from the voters, whether it is the united states or britain or france or germany, we see it all over the world. that is, this is a sensitive issue. ukraine is a sensitive issue, and of course ukraine is on the agenda, including domestic political races which happen from time to time in democratic countries of the world, because democracy is, well , according to the english expression, it is when people choose their own government, and the government must like the one who wants to become the government, and of course he must say that what do the voters want to hear in a certain way, and in the

american, er, these, er, mid-term races, ukraine will now be a topic, it is among the priority questions to which the candidates must give answers, it is a big secret that er, in any society, there is er those who say no , we should continue, and others say no, we should not continue, well, this is of course democracy, different points of view, of course, the candidate from the republican party should respond to such challenges, which i think, among many other issues of pre-election issues, they usually comment in such and such a way this topic is a help to ukraine. thank you, mr. ihor. thank you for your answers to the question i asked. i will remind our viewers

. but i want to remind you that today we are conducting a survey and we asked you to give answers to such a question as to why russia accused ukraine of creating a dirty atomic bomb . 423 people took part in the vote, for which i am very grateful to you thank you, and here are the answers i offered, let's not summarize them by the way. here are the questions and answers i offered. russia is preparing a provocation. that is, it is inviting another ukraine, but it will do it itself. 83% think so. 13% think that russia is doing it in order to convince the west to stop . to give us weapons well, five percent, uh, wrote your version in the comments, what exactly you wrote, you can

read by going to the espresso youtube page. thank you for participating in this vote. thank you to everyone who watched us on the espresso tv channel thank you to everyone who watched the power on social networks, and in particular on youtube, i want to remind you once again that if you liked this program, please like it, if you didn't like it, dislike it . youtube well, that's all i have to end today's program. my name is yuri fizer . see you soon. we have great news about a 16-year-old tigran boy from ghana who was abducted by the russians in berdyansk and kept. he was released as a prisoner already in svobod and he is with his parents now everything is fine with him at the same time the child had to go through a really real horror imagine at 5 in the morning the

russians broke into the house where the guy lived with his grandmother right in front of an elderly woman, her minor grandson was brutally beaten, twisted and taken from the house where they took the boy and why, in principle, he was detained , the russian military did not explain for some time the relatives of the 16-year-old tigran did not know anything at all about the fate of the boy, where he is and where to look for him. and even after his release, they have some details in their lyudmila denisova, the former human rights commissioner of the verkhovna rada, told facebook that at first he was held in the notorious berdyansk correctional colony number 77, there they were interrogated accusing him of being a fire adjuster, then they were transferred to the police temporary detention center where they were kept in solitary confinement berdyansk correctional colony number 77 where they were held boy, it's really a very infamous place called a fugitive torture chamber, now the russians illegally receive there mostly residents of the occupied territories

men, women, as it turned out, even children, so imagine what terrible conditions 16-year-old tigran found himself in and what horror he experienced. during his captivity at the moment, we cannot tell all the details of the boy's release to everyone, in the end, the russians did release those grans. and what is very important, this happened in particular thanks to widely publicized in the mass media and social networks, the very story of the abduction of a minor boy is indisputably another proof of the crimes of the russian military repression against their illegal detention and placement in places of freedom is a gross violation of the un convention on the rights of the child, the universal declaration of human rights and the geneva convention on the protection of the civilian population in time of war, and unfortunately, gran became far from the only child kidnapped by the russians , only in our programs we have told you about similar stories more than once so that in april, the russian military kidnapped and held

16-year-old vlad in captivity for 90 days. there were bandages there, well, there were cotton balls with blood, i still remember this picture, when i look at the examination room, on the left, a completely beaten man is hanging from the wires. it happened and you know the smell of a wet cloth soaked in blood. i can still feel it. we also told you about the story