every day they bring victory closer glory to the air forces of the armed forces of ukraine glory to ukraine this is a verdict program my name is serhiy rudenko good day and good health to all today is the 243rd day of the heroic resistance of the ukrainian people to the russian invaders russia accuses ukraine of trying to use a dirty bomb lavros kigli or does it lack evidence atrocities of russian troops in buch, and putin's army continues to flee from kherson region, meanwhile, the russian army continues to lose manpower and equipment in ukraine as of the morning of the 24 of october, russia has already lost 67,940 people in ukraine in the last day alone, the armed forces of ukraine destroyed 470 orks at the beginning of the great war, the russians have already lost in ukraine 2,590 tanks, 5,295

armored combat vehicles, 1,673 artillery systems, 375 rocket launchers, 189 anti-aircraft weapons, 270 aircraft, 245 helicopters, 4,044 units of automotive equipment 16 ships boats - 329 cruise missiles 1370 drones 149 units of special equipment so about the latest statements of the stable and about how he calls the ministers of defense member countries of nato and warns them about ukraine's use of the so-called dirty bomb, today we will talk for the next hour, we have lieutenant general retired deputy chief of the general staff of the armed forces of ukraine in 2006-2010 ihor romanenko mr. generals dobrogo have a good day. thank you for

joining our conversation. thank you to each other. well, we hope that the day will be better than in the conditions of air alarms and enemy actions. yes, sir, generals. so, during the last few days russian propaganda and then the representatives of the russian authorities pump up the topic of the possible use of a dirty bomb by ukraine, let's explain to our tv viewers what a dirty bomb means and why the russian federation has now begun to actively discuss the possibility of using such a weapon. -th substance with elements of radio-electro-radionuclides during detonation, which spread over a certain territory on an area radiates into these elements can be in the form of a

solution or in the form of a powder and according to which e-e then uh, that means uh, because they affect living organisms, plants, animals, humans, by their ionizing radiation, uh, that means they are destroyed, internal organs are affected, a person is infected, uh, he is not infected, and the disease will begin with radiation, the disease is caused by uh, such actions, uh, that's it all this is exactly dirty, a dirty bomb means a dirty bomb . there are also varieties of it, that is, during the detonation of a nuclear or thermonuclear bomb, one of the factors that affects is also

these elements that infect the surface, but it is called from english sold bombat, that is, from salty in this case, the bomb also forms elements of radioactive contamination. during the detonation of this nuclear or thermonuclear bomb, that is, now, taking into account that there is a difference, now there should be a conversation about the fact that this conversation is about a dirty bomb for the soviet union, it was developed from 53 to 58- and the corresponding exams were conducted last year, and the basis for ee elements ee means that some charge the surface with radioactive is ee nuclear plant

, that is, waste from the activities of nuclear plants can be used to produce such a mouth dirty bombs, they left their time in the russian federation, and therefore there is a possibility that they can apply it in this case, the question is being considered that they can do it under the guise of another flag, that is, they blame ukraine for this, and they do it in this way about this is what ours told me with er, that means kuleba in relation to the fact that if russia's great-great-grandfathers raise any slogans about the boot, as if er in relation to what ukraine is doing, it means that we must expect that, most likely, they have already prepared such an ugly provocation what is most likely happening right now

is the representative of the ministry of defense of the russian federation ihor kyrylov says that the ukrainians are preparing this dirty bomb, a low-power nuclear munition, the target seems to be accusing russia of using weapons of mass effect, let's hear the representative of the occupiers provocations connected with the detonation of the so-called mud bomb or low-power nuclear munition are provocations that will offend russia in that it used a weapon of mass destruction in the ukrainian theater of military action and will launch a powerful anti-russian company in the world on the virgin land for

detonation . warrior, the moments when these dirty bombs were used, did you mention that in the soviet union this concept was being developed? i remember the use, but i would like to draw attention to the fact that this general did so, so he falsified at least two facts. the first president zelenskyi did not talk about ukraine's intentions to create nuclear weapons, he said that if it goes like this, then it makes sense for ukraine to reject e. budapestskyi of the memorandum because he did not protect our state, the document was signed, but from the point of view of security, it did nothing, but there was also no conversation about the fact that we are on the path to obtaining nuclear weapons - this is the first and second, he

compares a dirty bomb that does not have no proof that we have it and it talks about a dirty bomb as well as a nuclear bomb of low power, we don't have nuclear weapons either, and he makes such a claim for his population, that is, that ukraine is a state that aspires or has some kind of nuclear weapon. and we started with this that if it is dirty and this is an element, if a nuclear bomb or a thermonuclear bomb is detonated, then there are other factors that affect, that is, the impulses of a shock war, and so on, and so on, which means that there will be very significant falsifications, well , in relation to the fact that somewhere e- i can't use it to say such things, to give examples, that is, during the

training, we americans conducted the relevant exams, and in soviet times, everything was done to the soviet union, but in relation to the application, i cannot give well -argued examples on this matter yesterday. and the day before yesterday, serhii sheygup held a telephone conversation with the foreign ministers of great britain, the united states of america, france, and he, er, i understand that in these conversations i was talking about the danger of using such a dirty bomb by the ukrainian state, well, at least i tried of course, the russian government will convince. moreover, the minister of defense, or rather, the minister of attack of the russian federation, lie and try to do everything in this way in order to use this dirty weapon under the flag of ukraine and then accuse the ukrainian government of volodymyr zelenskyi

for what in the evening address to the ukrainians spoke about this provocation that the russian federation is preparing. we will hear from volodymyr zelensky when today the russian minister of defense arranges a telephone carousel and calls foreign ministers with stories about the so-called dirty nuclear bomb , everyone understands everything well, they understand who is the source of everything dirty that can be imagined in this war , scattered it, blackmailed it with radiation. dam and aggregates of the kakhovka hpp and blackmail them to blow it up, russia uses phosphorous ammunition, prohibited anti-personnel mines

and the entire range of weapons against civil infrastructure ukraine is always about refusal always about life and if someone can use nuclear weapons in our part of europe, then it is only an object and this subject just ordered comrade sheik to call somewhere there if russia is calling he says that ukraine is allegedly preparing something, then this means one thing russia already all of this was prepared by mr. general according to your opinion. the russian federation is conducting negotiations with the defense ministers of the nato member countries. they are forcing the west to sit down at the negotiating table behind the russian federation. do they have the exact intention to use this dirty weapon on kherson oblast, that is why they are so actively leaving kherson and moving to the left bank. they have

such an opportunity, this does not mean that they are implementing dirty russian propaganda about ebelskaya. - a reception that would explain to them the situation in this case in the kherson region, where combat operations are being carried out correctly by groups of the armed forces of the russian federation, and he must first of all explain this to his citizens in российской федерации well, they are trying to reformat the approaches of our allies, first of all, thanks to such propaganda and thanks to the demonstration of the direction of activity and the palayet

that are in all countries, putin spends billions of dollars of oil on their support and gas dollars, and this was done during the entire 200-year term of mr. general’s ego, after all, if the russian federation succeeds in using such a dirty weapon, what danger does it pose not only for the region in which it will be used, but for the general of ukraine in general for europe and in general for russia, since the wind can, let’s say, change like this, and the situation can radically change for those who use these weapons and bring them to russia, the possibility of such a possibility is not excluded, but i think that before using it,

they will try to check there so that this happens precisely in the tirakhiv regions, that is why we are carrying out the appropriate counter and dialogic work on this matter, we are working with our allies and putting pressure on the leadership of the russian federation. they are trying to change the forms, that is a tactical nuclear weapon is the zaporizhzhia nuclear power plant, a dirty bomb is now an undermining of a hydroelectric power plant, that is, it changes shape in one way or another in order to divert the attention of the world community , the leaders of our allies, from what is happening on the front line in the occupied territory, in this case it is very important what is happening in the kherson direction where their a serious

defeat is expected, and therefore it is necessary to explain this situation to its citizens and try to explain the position in the international circle, therefore, the propaganda of the prime minister is directing all the time, changing the vector in order to to update the approaches in one way or another, to introduce from the fact that they do not know both their citizens and the world society, the leaders of our allies, the true state of affairs around er into the group of actions of the russian federation troops well, i mean, first of all, on the right bank, this group where er- from a military point of view, hmm, that means they will be defeated in the near future. generals, you have already mentioned the munich conference about

zelensky’s speech on february 19, 2022, when he spoke about the guarantees of eh in accordance with the budapest memorandum and when ukraine gave up its nuclear weapons, if we speak without reference to the current situation before russia's war against ukraine and perceive nuclear weapons as a deterrent weapon, then in your opinion, should ukraine still have nuclear weapons in the future? the answer can be to this is my opinion as a specialist. why. because i command the anti-aircraft missile regiment from the anti-aircraft missile brigade of the kievsky brigade armed with divisions and these structures. there were missiles with nuclear warheads. i understand their power. possibility and i definitely want to say that at least tactical nuclear weapons would be our protection for the

future, but um, our military and political leadership at that time did not cope with this situation, and we have to face the consequences of this now during the war and the nearest the time to return the weapons, in my opinion, is not appropriate, although we can clearly imagine that the possibilities of ukraine regarding the restoration of nuclear weapons are a matter of time in economic development and, most importantly, in political form, friends, we are working live on the espresso tv channel, as well as on our social networks on youtube, we are conducting a survey, today we ask you about the following: does ukraine need nuclear weapons, three options for answers: yes, no, and also your option. please write in the comments under the e-e video you are currently watching on youtube well and

please do not forget to like the video that you are currently seeing on facebook and youtube. finally, mr. general, i would like to hear your comment on the statement of the deputy head of the administration of the president of russia federation serhii kiriyenko, who says that russia will win the war, but for this it must become a people's war, let's hear kiriyenko and the hot and economic and that very psychological information war that is being waged against us, but for this we need it to be a people's war so that every person feels his sympathy so that every person has the opportunity to contribute to our common victory so, mr. general, russia wants to win this war in ukraine, there is no other way to win this war, otherwise the future

ukraine as an independent and free state can be called into question. it does not want russia to win the war and the whole civilized world against which russia is actually trying to fight your way. what can prevent russia from winning the war in ukraine ? first of all, this is a political figure. at a high level publicly declares that they are no longer conducting a special operation, what is all this about formally putting on themselves, er, these clothes are a special operation, but they are waging a war, and this is a lot to talk about, first of all, and secondly, they are such p-5 is still propagandistic, thanks to which it means that it is unfair that the war was not provoked by

ukraine, our people, which was started by the russian federation and is now being waged. anyone and anyone and as much as you want to turn it into a national one. that's why it's a struggle in the history of 1812, where they are, they called it patriotic yes and it means it's clear that the second war where svitova took part, the soviet union took part, and now izeta in order to explain that everything is not going as it should be, that uh, it 's about paraska, it's necessary to leave, so they uh, all the time find some kind of ancestral techniques to

explain and uh- to its people to its citizens and also tries to explain to the world community that they are waging a just war, and not so much with ukraine, again, from the submission of propaganda, but with all nato countries, which is not true, there is help from the side, but they the city does not fight, the sky does not close. well, and so on, so ukraine leads in the common interests, of course. thank you for the help of the allies, but this is still a war of ukraine with the aggressor country. thank you, mr. generals, for the conversation with participation in our program. this was a retired lieutenant general, deputy ihor romanenko, the chief of the general staff of the armed forces of ukraine in 2006-2010, talked with him about the threats of the russian federation,

about the statement that ukraine could use the so-called dirty bomb during the russian-ukrainian war, friends. i remind you that we we work live on the espresso tv channel as well as on our social networks. if you are watching us now on youtube, you can like this video and also become a sponsor of our youtube channel under this video you can see the sponsor button, you can join the sponsorship, we will be very grateful to you in addition we are conducting a survey today, we are asking you about whether ukraine needs nuclear weapons, so yes, no, and your option, please vote at the end of the program , we will sum up the results of this vote. well, what's next we are in touch with andriy ryzhenko, an expert at the center for defense strategies, captain of the first rank , deputy chief of staff of the navy of ukraine in 2004-2020. good day to andriy and good health to you. have a good day. thank you. today, mr.

andriy, is 8 months old in a large-scale russia's invasion of ukraine, let's briefly sum up these 8 months. in what way did these eight months pass for ukraine? what did ukraine gain, what did it lose? and what did the russian federation gain in this situation? the date is a little er, well, seriously, let's say that for us, it really is in the history of modern ukraine. this is probably the most disturbing and the most difficult in 8 months. well, first of all, i want to say that it began on february 24. they were attacked because actually on the borders of ukraine, er, russian troops were, well, practically the last year before that, with

a short break, and then starting from october 21 , they were constantly there, there were numerical operators, numerical training and, in principle, everything pointed to the fact that they will not be near the borders just like that, but we remember the discussions that took place around er, so er, there will be an attack or not. and indeed, many people said that there will not be an attack in principle i can say that the meaning of this was because, in principle, it is real a-a for those who know life in ukraine and know what threats uh-uh what threats exactly to russia, ukraine will inflict, it was absurd to fall on ukraine, but in um in the head putin had a different opinion, which was formed by a small number of people who wanted to...

practically, the first is to satisfy putin's ambitions, the leading soviet empire, and the second is to concentrate as much as possible all the resources that are in ukraine and earn profits . a small amount of time and days well, in principle, the russians were able to seize a rather serious territory of our ukraine on our state, especially this applies to the south and ukraine, in fact, in the south, on february 24, they were already at the border the dnipro was captured kakhovka, eh, but i want to say that this first

effect of the first blow did not come for them, but first, well, we began to put up a serious resistance, and thanks to the fact that, in principle, the military knew about this attack , the main, most capable part of it capable were withdrawn from the object of the strike, i mean, it is the bpo forces, it's our combat units, it's our aviation , and in principle, then, then, er, starting. military resistance we remember what they have there were losses in the first days, they actually lost thousands of soldiers per day, because their tactics were very wrong. they thought that they would be met here, but it didn't work out. this is the first stage, it basically lasted until the moment when the russians

realized that kyiv you they won't be able to take it, they have to change something, and after a month they were simply forced to select their troops from kiev, well, in those places where they were simply not nominated before that, they concentrated allegedly in the east and in the south of our country but there, first, second a stage that was supposed to begin somewhere in april and end before victory day with the taking full control of donetsk luhansk oblast at their borders . he did not succeed and in fact it all continued until the moment when er, well, in fact, you know, in this stage from 13 until ukraine left in the counteroffensive and in the month of march, it did not liberate the entire

captured kharkiv region and part of the kherson region, a total of 10,000 square kilometers, it was a serious blow to the russian federation, they moved to the next stage of the war, which i think it started somewhere on october 10, just as the appointment of a new commander of this and this bandit group and it started again with airstrikes well, now these strikes were directed well, not so much at military objects as at the people of ukraine at the energy infrastructure and objects of the economy and we know that in fact, for 10 days , such strikes were carried out daily , many cruise missiles were also lost and used, and again they began to use these kamikaze drones, again mostly excluded on civilian objects.

this is how it is now, and in principle putin was forced to start the mobilization partly, allegedly he and they had already conducted it, but they simply transferred such a hidden character to them, and now, well, they are actually not getting anything done, even they are already mobilizing more and more. and now they are chaotically asking this in these mobilized in some way to arm themselves and ask for weapons from their allies belarus and look for weapons on their satellites all over the world and it doesn't work very well, but further and further it becomes obvious that, in principle, they and they can't even gain a foothold in the territories that they have left, well, from those captured in ukraine and well, the next symptom is the right bank of the

dnieper . evacuation from the right bank to the left bank, and well, it’s already like that, well, it will be very serious, it would be very serious, such a blow to putin ’s self-esteem. before that, there were nuclear threats, and that means nuclear there there are some tactical weapons of limited influence and so on. well, for those who know what nuclear weapons are in general, it looks absolutely unacceptable, because that's why, in the end, i received it from the a line, precisely from the leaders of the countries of the world, those who possess it