of course, she can't manage countries. it's clear, but now she at least represents belarus in the west and is trying to consolidate the west against lukashenka, that's why i asked you. why didn't you mention her, we'll be in two years. svitlana dyukanovska missed all the opportunities to change the situation in belarus. the country is popular in fact and the lawyers are catastrophically falling the regions of ukraine understand that. well, let's have one more question about ordinary belarusians. you already said that, for example, if there is a purely hypothetical attack by belarus on ukraine, there will of course be a response from ukraine. the people of belarus will not support the belarusian army and will rise up against lukashenka . now the attitude of ordinary belarusians, if you stop someone not in the city, not in

minsk, but somewhere in the district center, stop a belarusian and ask if he is afraid of war, because lukashenko has been constantly scaring him with this war lately, what am i i am doing everything so that the war does not come to belarus. if you ask such a very simple belarusian whether he is afraid of war, he will say. i think 80% 90% are against the traitor who will be russia just in ukraine. belorussian to me, i will buy the war categorically against his participation in this time. солидарной сегодня в большойстве свой спрой i did not write about that, i asked about whether ordinary belarusians are afraid of war as lukashenko is afraid of it, well, at least as he tries to show it in each of his last speeches about what is the war in ukraine? the war can start any day over coming to the territory of belarus. is he inciting this fear? are ordinary

belarusians afraid of it? of course, how are people like any country? how are people in ukraine ? military actions will be transferred to the territory of belarus, but the illusion is that they report that most likely it is not limited , and they understand that ukraine has the absolute right to retaliate against military objects. er, in belarus, that is, er, well, people understand that the lukashenko regime unleashed this war against ukraine, er, together with putin, and constantly provokes the ukrainian authorities to respond, that is, this is the understanding of the people. thank you for participating in to my program today. thank you for your frank and honest answers that helped us ukrainians to understand certain issues and i wish you and us all the best. thank you, it was nataliya radina, a belarusian journalist. i would like to remind

everyone who is watching us now on youtube like it if you like it don't like it if you don't like it though i really hope you like it and vote for us today voting ah why did russia accuse ukraine of creating a dirty atomic bomb and three options for answers russia is preparing a provocation to convince the west to stop giving weapons to ukraine well and your option, vote, join now, i will try to find at least how do you vote 84, so the percentages tell me that russia is preparing a provocation for the second question to convince the west to stop 10% voted to give weapons to ukraine. well, the rest all voted, obviously, your option , you can read the options on our youtube page.

so, let's move on to another topic . iranian drones are doing a lot of damage to ukrainian cities , ukrainian civil infrastructure in many regions of ukraine, electricity supply has not been fully restored, and even fan shutdowns were implemented and all because of these iranian death birds about it why iran gives it well and how can we still pere can we convince iran not to do this, i will talk to my next guest , this is igor semegolovets, director of the center for middle eastern studies. congratulations, mr. igor. congratulations. drones and even more missiles about which information has appeared, the fact is that the

iranians claim that they do not transfer them, yes. and this is the first problem we face, because it is one thing when we work from a country that transfers acknowledges this fact and accordingly, it is possible to negotiate with this country on what conditions it will do this, it will not be a different thing when we know that it is being transmitted by drones, the instructors are actively participating in the war against ukraine, nato places, the country claims that it is this year. so, although the behavior shows that in fact there are no legitimate ways to pressure or persuade this country not to do so. so if we look at it as a problem that needs to be solved, then how about me the only way

the solution to this problem is the destruction of drones, that is, the provision of a sufficient number of effective anti-aircraft weapons, the development of an early warning system of the approach of those armed forces, and frantic air defense. directly or in iran or abroad by structures to people who are involved in the development of the use and application of weapons, that is, mr. ihor, you mean that the sanctions will not affect iran in any way now. and this is to stop the stop the supply of weapons to it, and of course sanctions in any case sanctions have

a limited term and that is, if sanctions are applied now in relation to specific drones of specific weapons, then the effect can be er noticeable only there in a few months ato and er in a few years yes that is, we perfectly understand that people sitting there are not stupid either, they are also stocking up , in addition, we have some uh opportunities plus uh maximum diversification plus i understand that this is uh cooperation of several countries and it is already clear that here we already have, as a minimum, the cooperation of china, russia, and together, that is, in this sense, it is not so easy. you won't do it, yura, but this is what i said about the fact that israel bombed the factory where these weapons and other iranian weapons were manufactured with a pinpoint strike on the territory of syria. i understand correctly that this is not

their main factory. it is just one of the factories. is it the main one? i assume that it was just a shed in which a few drones were assembled. that is, in principle, this is absolutely not the case, it is not the main enterprises, it is simple some very, very a limited shop for collecting these fractions, that is, you shouldn’t be happy after receiving this information. well, unfortunately, i would still like it to be a large factory that was hit so well, but unfortunately, now let’s talk about the iranian instructors who were unfortunately well, they are on the territory of ukraine, but some of them were already there because our army sent them to the other world, so the killing of iranian instructors can change something , well, that is, iran will say no. sorry, we will stop sending our instructors because you do not do you provide them with adequate security? well

, as far as i understand, the iranians already thought about it in the winter and they want to transfer part of their constructors to belarus, because they believe that they will be safe in belarus, and from there, well, they will not welcome ukrainians to belarus missiles that will kill them , that is, so far, so far, the destruction of several dozen iranian instructors has such an effect so far, that is, they are being reworded, but, well, obviously, the fact of their presence and readiness to help the russians influence the ukrainians , united states secretary of state anthony blinken said on friday that tehran, according to american and not only intelligence data, intends to transfer to the russian

army even more drones of these shaheds, which russia then redraws the names and is already called geranium and even these missiles are medium- range missiles that fly 500-700 km, yes. look , for tehran, cooperation with russia is at this stage - is this just business or is it geopolitics? it's not business anymore, it's not business anymore. well, of course, business had a place here. yes, and i think that for a certain time, maybe it occupied the lion 's share of the space in conversations with the russians. geopolitics was necessary if they were to be involved, i.e. already for them to find themselves in certain er certain circumstances in which it was very difficult to get out and er, i think there were two

moments pe- the first er to be more precise, their politics was immediately present except for money, i think it is raw because that as of now, in essence, russia has transferred to iran in sicily is practically the entire management. yes, that is, we have a-a that the iranians control almost completely a series of eh and eh. yes, when there was a conversation about eh well , there was definitely no conversation about the formation of forests for the formation of the alliance, but now in those in the circumstances, we see what it is. yes, they are already creating an alliance, and this is already the next step, that is, the calculation of the russians was correct, first let them bury the money, so to speak, and increase the influence in the band-aid, and then go to the level of the strategic alliance, and as a result, the iranians got into such a trap strategic from which well, as of now, i don't

see iran, at the same time, wants to become well, a driving force, one of the key players in the region, yes, yes, they do not want to be, and they dreamed of it, and they had every chance on this and i think that uh, let's be honest, in the 15th year of the agreement , the uh tube gave them tools to achieve this very goal, the money and resources that they used, including for the production of triplets of missiles and for expansion in the region, and the most powerful and the raptor sounded exactly after the 15th year after the signing of the nuclear agreement agreements, and with this situation, it seems to me that the iranians are a little ahead, and let's say they overextended their efforts and overestimated their capabilities. and all this turned out to be the black swan that arrived a month ago, when

the first riots actually started early. now they are already taking the form of major riots and in essence , anti-shia, anti-islamic movement, anti-etov movement, anti -regime movement, that is, what is happening now in iran is clearly a consequence of those overstrains that iran went through precisely on the way to expansion in the middle east, you already started talking about these riots, i just wanted to ask you about them, but there is some kind of future in them, because there were riots in iran in the history of modern iran in the early days, and they were all by the islamic regime. the riots have a future they can have a future well predicting riots is very difficult you understand that person especially when we are talking about um when

we are dealing with such a country as iran where are these nkvd troops well i mean the corps guards of the papal revolution 10 million of all the cells that are basij and many other things, yes , that is, those that are the pillars of the regime are quite powerful , and it seems that in these conditions there is no point in even dreaming about a possible success, and on the other hand, we perfectly understand that the iranians are 80 million, and it is a country can not be changed from the outside, changes if they are capable , they can come only from the inside, based on this, it is elementary, so it was logical, it is clear that there were a lot of riots in the restrooms, but i will try to list the differences, which ones were not

before, the first difference is that all previous riots took place within the framework of the so- called islamic islamic political system, that is, the people protested, but they came from the fact that it is not possible to touch the framework. you can touch communism, communism can be good, but executive communism is bad, how would it have been once upon a time , when anti-communist movements appeared, which demanded the destruction of the framework, then it started to pour down, the same thing is happening now the first, the first riots, actually calls into question the framework itself, and the second point is that not only urban riots are involved in all riots, there are also strata that are easy to rise, who traditionally

participate in such riots, and those riots are joined by national minorities and national outskirts. and this is very important. from the point of view of a further further development of this uprising a-a how can i say an uprising because in the direction of the peaceful stables we are dealing not only with filial actions a already with the uprising a-a the third point is that before those uprisings the working class joins these riots, this also doesn't happen often in iran, and recently the strikes we see are becoming wider and workers are joining them, and this strike movement is becoming in principle, the women's movement is powerful, there has never been such a women's movement before which we have now and in fact it destroys all the scrips of the regime yes

that is it drinks the very average of this regime and the last thing i can say is also new these are the bazaars bazaars that is the people of the bazaar these are small traders who were usually the basis of the regime and if possible to mention the islamic revolution, it is just that bazaars were those who actively supported the islamic regime and they were often used as a countermeasure to any students there, and therefore now i also actively support bazaars, well, a significant number, or i will not say about all of them, but a significant number of bazaars support e- e protestors economic troubles drought e-e the results of the collision e-e expansion unpopular war and war is not popular

implementation so all of this in general, of course, creates a completely new situation that has never existed before well, this is really a new situation and i still want them to do something this time. thank you , mr. igor, for joining my program and for giving professional answers to my questions and clarifying those areas that are difficult for understanding of me and my viewers, i will remind you that ihor simovelos , the director of the institute of middle eastern studies, was with me. well, i am ready to introduce my new guest. you don't like the program, although i really hope you like it and write something, it's important for us and for the promotion of the program. well, vote in our voting today. why did russia accuse ukraine of creating a dirty atomic bomb? at the moment, 341 people have already voted. russia

is preparing a provocation . 83% believe that the cessation of arms supplies to ukraine is 12% and your option is five percent, vote. you still have about 15 minutes, we will summarize the results at the end of the program. ambassador extraordinary and plenipotentiary of ukraine i congratulate you mr. igor thank you very much for joining good health i greet you always happy p igor well, you served as ambassador in great britain you know this country very well please tell me today or rather yesterday evening the information appeared that boris johnson will not participate in the prime ministerial race penny mordon most likely today by 16:00 for kyiv will not get enough votes of conservative members of parliament and there will be only one candidate rishi sunak former

the head of the british ministry of finance, and since he will be alone, today after 2:00 p.m. it is quite likely that he will become the new prime minister of great britain p ihor tell me, please, something will change for ukraine p ihor you heard me, the connection was interrupted, then i repeat again once your question. look, you know great britain very well , because you served as ambassador there. and so, uh, about the elections , uh, at the moment, johnson said that he is withdrawing his candidacy. penny mordan says that she is moving on, but it is unlikely that today 16:00 for kyiv will receive sufficient support from conservative parliamentarians and the only thing that remains is the former head of the british ministry of finance

. something will change for us in the general strategic approach of great britain, because today the question of ukraine's support for britain's independence is conservatives, libertarians or liberal democrats , this is a matter of political consensus, and elections party members of the same conservative party that is currently in power, or in the liberal democratic party or in some other party, there is a lot left of the party of the activity of the represented parliaments of britain, the internal party problems, britain has built for many years a sufficiently lively political system that is able to cope with any

domestic political challenges and the issue of ukraine is not an internal political challenge, it is a foreign policy challenge around foreign policy challenges, the history of britain testifies to the british the public always unites, it seems to me that the case of the country is exactly the same case. that is , you mean because in our country you understand when boris johnson resigned from the post of prime minister. everyone said boris, who are you throwing us at? once in office, the prime minister who said thank god that this is a forest trust and not a rascal, but it should not be said correctly, the support of britain will remain, of course, the support of britain will remain, but we are used to saying everything that we think, do you understand that we have such a psychotype in ukraine is closer to let's put it this way the mediterranean team of the civilization of the british is a little different, they say less but

do more, and that is why, once again, i emphasize the election of the leader of the conservative party of britain. he knows better about financial problems because of his portfolio, which he held in the same conservative government, so it's the same with us again communication with mr. igor kharchenko has been lost. now we will try to connect with him again. well, he will obviously agree, he should have agreed on what he said about rishi sunaka, who, as i said, is the ex-head of the ministry of finance of great britain and, as mr. igor said, he he is well-versed in british money, probably more than

anyone else. and i personally fear that, knowing how much of this money there is in great britain, he would not say at some point that people are good and maybe it will be enough to spend this money on ukraine, well at least not in such an amount as we spend, maybe it is worth why, for example, the prime minister, the backstage highway, why the minister, the prime minister, canister resigned because she could not overcome the severe economic crisis that is currently in great britain, i am very afraid so that sunak did not just say that in order to overcome this strong and very big economic crisis in great britain, we will use the money we have in our country first of all for the citizens of great britain, and of course we will then give this money to ukraine, mr. ihor, i was told what happened to you have restored contact, you can continue what you were saying, i am also saying that uh, i just started. let

's leave the british internal political issues to the british where the issue concerns universal human values, and the issue of ukraine's struggle against russian aggression from the british point of view is a universal human value with what is the consensus in british society and in the society of most civilized countries of the world, then we have nothing to fear from the point of view of the fact that it is possible for a change of party or government leader to change politics. no to me it seems that they do not care. then let 's talk about another country, about the united states of america, and in particular about whether we should be afraid of what is happening there, and there is such a kind of split in the republican party . because we give too much to ukraine and spend too little on solving

our own problems, mid-term elections to the congress will be held in early november, and there, with a high degree of probability, the majority in got got got a majority republicans can get is this uh hm should somehow alarm us i don't think it should alarm us the american political system is not as traditionally old as the british one but it is also uh durable despite the fact that a few years ago we had domestic political very serious events in the united states of america are related to the activities of the previous president. but it seems to me that there are always issues that somehow find a response from the voters and today ukraine definitely finds a response from the voters,

whether it is the united states or britain or france or germany, we see it all over the world. that is, this is a sensitive issue. ukraine is a sensitive issue, and of course ukraine is on the agenda, including domestic political races which happen from time to time in the democratic countries of the world, because democracy is, well , according to the english expression, it is when people choose their government, and the government must like the one who wants to become the government, and of course he must say that what do the voters want to hear in a certain way, and in the american, er, these, er, mid-term races, ukraine will now be a topic, it is among the priority questions to which the candidates must give answers, it is a big secret that er, in any society, there is er those who say no

, we should continue, and others say no, we should not continue, well, this is of course democracy, different points of view, of course, and the candidate from the republican party should respond to such challenges, which i think, among other issues of pre-election issues, comment on, of course, such and such this is the topic of assistance to ukraine. thank you , mr. ihor. thank you for your answers to the question i asked. i will remind our viewers. to complete the program, but i want to remind you that today we are conducting a survey and we asked you to give answers to the following question: why did russia accuse ukraine of creating a dirty atomic bomb

? 423 people took part in the vote, for which i thank you very much, and this is what answers i proposed, let's not summarize them by the way. here are the questions and answers. i proposed that russia is preparing a provocation. that is, it is inviting another ukraine, but it will do it itself. 83% think so. 13% think that russia is doing it in order to convince the west to stop giving us weapons. well and five percent wrote their version in the comments . you can read exactly what you wrote by going to the espresso youtube page. thank you for participating in this vote. thank you to everyone who watched us on the espresso tv channel. thank you to everyone who watched the power of social networks, and in particular on youtube, i want to remind you once again that if you liked this program, please like it, if you didn't like it

, dislike it, although i really don't want it. well, write something, it's important for us and for the promotion of our program on youtube. i am therefore forced to end today's program . my name is yuri fizer. see you later. vietnamese balm zirka is the first step in the treatment of colds . it is a proven medicine, not a cosmetic mixture. we will be healthy. ask vietnamese pharmacies. trust only proven medicine , no matter what ukrainians think about, so that they don't talk about the first place, it's still a war, a war, and our victory, seven days a week from monday, monday, seven different spheres of human activity, sports, culture , politics